CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2311 - STRUDWICKThis appeal has been take in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 9 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." Also on 9 February 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the Order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 15 February 1983. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge denying a temporary license. It is urged that the denial was erroneously based on a regulation existing in 1957 which no longer exists and a decision based on that regulation instead of on the current regulations.Appeal No. 2311Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/17/19835/17/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2312 - HITT IIIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 504 and 49 CFR Part 6. By order dated 21 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia denied Appellant's application for attorney's fees and expenses incurred as a result of defending himself against a charge of misconduct brought by the Coast Guard against his Operator's license. One specification supported the charge of misconduct. It was alleged that, while serving as Operator aboard tug LARK, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 0650 on 11 April 1982, while transiting the Nanticoke River Entrance, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties by leaving the tug bridge without proper relief. Appellant pled guilty to a concurrently filed negligence charge. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 11 May 1982. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an order in which he dismissed the misconduct charge and specification.Appeal No. 2312Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/22/19835/22/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2313 - STAPLESThis appeal has ben taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 3 December 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that, while serving as Second Pumpman on board the SS GULF OIL, O.N. 283424, under authority of the above captioned Merchant Mariner's Document, on or about 12 October 1981, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter by beating with fists, a member of the crew, the Chief Engineer, Richard J. Driscoll; and, that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did wrongfully assault the Third Assistant Engineer, David W. Thunell by brandishing a fire axe and a pocketknife in a threatening manner and offering to inflict bodily harm. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts on 3 December 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced two documents and the testimony of two witnesses into evidence. In defense, Appellant introduced seven documents and his own testimony into evidence.Appeal No. 2313Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/22/19835/22/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2314 - CREWSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 April 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's document, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. One specification found proved alleged that while serving as Bosun on board the SS SANTA LUCIA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 2 November 1980, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a fellow crewmember by striking him in the face with his fist. A second specification found proved alleged a simple assault on 3 November 1980 on another crewmember. Additionally found proved are four specifications of either wrongful absence or wrongful failure to perform duties, none of which exceeds one day in duration, between 23 October 1980 and 2 January 1981. The hearing, in four sessions, was held at New York, New York on 12 January and 16 January 1981 and at Jacksonville, Florida on 30 January and 15 April 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and to specifications one through five and of guilty to specification six alleging a wrongful failure to report for duty at 0800 and 1300, 2 January 1981 while the SS SANTA LUCIA was at anchor at Callao, Peru.Appeal No. 2314Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19835/23/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2315 - FIFERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 18 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." On 17 March 1983 Appellant file a Notice of Appeal from the Order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 24 March 1983. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge denying a temporary license. It is urged that Appellant's service on board a vessel is compatible with the requirements for safety of life and property at sea and Appellant's prior record justifies the issuance of a temporary license. I note that these are the criteria for issuing a temporary license set forth in 46 CFR 5.30-15 and that the Administrative Law Judge did not address them in his denial.Appeal No. 2315Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/6/19836/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2316 - MCNAUGHTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 January 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as master on board S.S. BAY STATE under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 29 July 1980, Appellant allowed said vessel to sail with insufficient metacentric height to meet the requirements set forth in the vessel's Trim and Stability Booklet. The Hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts on 21 October, 13 November, and 8 December 1980, and 6 January 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence 8 exhibits and the testimony of 2 witnesses including an expert on the calculation of metacentric height. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence 4 exhibits, his own testimony, and the testimony of one other witness.Appeal No. 2316Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/31/19838/31/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2317 - KONTOSThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 January 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked the seaman's document of Appellant, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an ordinary seaman aboard S/S LNG TAURUS under authority of his document above captioned, Appellant did on 20 November 1981 while S/S LNG TAURUS was in the port of Arun, Indonesia: (1) wrongfully fail to perform his duties by reason of intoxication; (2) assault and batter by beating with his fists a member of the crew, the Third Mate, Scott L. Ervin; (3) Assault and batter by biting on the lower leg a member of the crew, the Cargo Control Officer, William G. LANGELY; and (4) wrongfully damage the seawater temperature gauge and a light fixture with a chair in the Cargo Control Room. On 25 November 1981 the charges were served and the hearing was set for 13 January 1982. On 2 December 1981 Appellant telephoned the Administrative Law Judge requesting an earlier hearing sometime before Christmas. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request because the principal witnesses, were to be at sea between Indonesia and Japan until January 1982. Appellant was duly notified of this denial and the reasons for it by the Administrative Law Judge. The hearing was held in absentia at Boston, Massachusetts on 13 January 1982.Appeal No. 2317Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/31/19838/31/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2318 - STRUDWICKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 9 February 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." Also on 9 February 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 15 February 1983. Decision on Appeal 2311 (STRUDWICK) of 17 May 1983 VACATED the Administrative Law Judge's order of 15 February 1983 and REMANDED the request for a temporary license for a new decision. By his order of 24 May 1983 the Administrative Law Judge again denied Appellant's request for a temporary license. BASIS OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge of 24 May 1983 denying a temporary license. Appellant urges that the denial was based on an erroneous interpretation of 46 CFR 5.30-15(b) and 46 CFR 5.03-5(b) prohibiting the issuance of temporary licenses and documents in cases involving those offenses listed in 46 CFR 5.03-5(b) as being deemed to affect the safety of life and property at sea.Appeal No. 2318Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/31/19838/31/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2319 - PAVELECThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 21 January 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license for one month, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V CANDY STORE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 5 November 1981, Appellant failed to maintain a proper lookout which contributed to the collision between the M/V CANDY STORE and the F/V MISS LAVON. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas on 8 December 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by profesional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2319Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19839/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2320 - MINTZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 September 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's document for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that, while serving as Steward Utility on board the SS PRESIDENT POLK under authority of the above captioned document Appellant: (1) on or about 2 December 1979 failed to obey the order of the Chief Steward to mop and buff passenger deck passageways and to clean the passenger lounge and card room; (2) on or about 2 December 1979 created a disturbance in the Purser's foyer by using loud exclamations and profanity to the Chief Steward; (3) on 7 December 1979 failed to obey the order of the Chief Steward to clean the garbage room; and (4) on 8 December 1979 failed to obey the order of the Chief Steward to clean the garbage room. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 5 February, 14 and 17 April, 20 May, 10 and 12 June and 17 September.Appeal No. 2320Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/7/19839/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2321 - HARRISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. B239) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dates 8 February 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license for two months, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as master aboard SS COVE EXPLORER under authority of the above captioned license, between 21 November 1981 and 1 December 1981, Appellant, while responsible for the material condition of the vessel, operated the vessel in an unseaworthy condition, to wit, fractured and wasted frames, longitudinal and side plating in the bow section of the vessel. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts on 7 January 1982, January 1982 and 15 January 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant pled not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2321Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/7/19839/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2322 - SHAWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order rendered 16 February 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleged that, while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 17 August 1981, Appellant was convicted by the Twenty-Third Judicial District Court of St. James Parish, Louisiana, a court of record, for violation of Sections 967(A) and (C) of 40 Louisiana Revised Statutes, a narcotic drug law violation. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 8 December 1981, 12 January 1982 and 27 January 1982, At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits.Appeal No. 2322Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/7/19839/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2323 - PHILPOTTThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 January 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's document for six months, plus six months on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Wiper on board the SS KEYSTONER under authority of the captioned document, on or about 8 December 1982, Appellant, at the Port of Houston, Texas had approximately ten grams of marijuana in his possession. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas and Long Beach, California on 17 December 1982 and 13 January 1983. At the hearing in Houston, Appellant was not present, but a motion for change of venue to Long Beach, California was made on his behalf and granted. At the hearing in Long Beach, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2323Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/13/19839/13/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2324 - AMATAGAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 June 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as utilityman on board the SS SANTA MARIA under the authority of the captioned document, on 20 October 1981, Appellant wrongfully possessed marijuana. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California on 6 January, 29 January, 4 February, 24 March and 5 April 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four documents and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of one witness. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved and entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The Decision and Order was served on 12 July 1982. Appeal was timely filed on 28 July 1982 and perfected on 7 April 1983.Appeal No. 2324Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/16/19839/16/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2326 - MCDERMOTTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 May 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's license for two months on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as person in charge of oil transfer operations on board the United States SS SANTA MAGDALENA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 6 May 1981, Appellant negligently allowed oil to be transferred to number 4 deep tank, thereby allowing a discharge of approximately one gallon of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. At the hearing on 22 July 1981, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and three exhibits.Appeal No. 2326Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/28/19839/28/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2325 - PAYNEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Operator on board the M/V ISABEL A. McCALLISTER, under authority of the captioned license on 1 February 1982, Appellant did, at or near the City of Portsmouth in the Commonwealth of Virginia on the Elizabeth River, negligently fail to safely navigate said vessel in such a manner as to preclude it from alliding with the Elizabeth River Portsmouth Marine Terminal Bouy NR4 (LLP 332). The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 22 April and 14 July 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2325Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/29/19839/29/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2328 - MINTZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 21 July 1981, an administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months, plus three months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Officer's Bedroom Steward on board the SS PRESIDENT McKINLEY under authority of the above captioned document, on or about 4 May 1981, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties by absenting himself from his duty station without permission at 1300 hours. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 2 and 30 June 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced four documents into evidence.Appeal No. 2328Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/4/198310/4/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2329 - FIFER IIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 8 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." On 17 March 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 24 March 1983. Decision on Appeal 2315 (FIFER) of 6 June 1983 VACATED the Administrative Law Judge's order of 24 March 1983 and REMANDED the request for a temporary license for a new decision. By his order of 20 June 1983 the Administrative Law Judge again denied Appellant's request for a temporary license.Appeal No. 2329Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/7/198310/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2330 - STRUDWICKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that on or about 28 January 1980, Appellant was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in cannabis by the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County Florida. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida on 9 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2330Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/7/198310/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2331 - ELLIOTTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 1 June 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Able Bodied Seaman on board the SS BUTTON GWINNETT under authority of the captioned document on or about 5 March 1982, Appellant did, aboard said vessel while at sea in the vicinity of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, wrongfully assault and batter a fellow member of the crew, Dennis P. Carter, with a knife. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 12 May 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced three documents, a chair, a drawing and the testimony of two witnesses into evidence.Appeal No. 2331Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/25/198311/25/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2332 - LORENZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 April 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license for one month, on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Engineer on board the United States vessel SS AMERICAN HAWK under authority of the above captioned license, on or about 23 January 1982, Appellant did fail to maintain a proper quantity of fuel on board the vessel to complete the voyage which commenced on 12 January 1982 from Jacksonville, Florida. As a result the vessel lost all power adjacent to the Galveston Bay Entrance Channel Lighted Buoy 7A, hazarding navigation and the vessel. The hearing was held at Galveston, Texas on 23 March 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2332Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198312/5/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2333 - AYALAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1 By order dated 21 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman's document for four months, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS MORMACSAGA under authority of the document above captioned, on 11 October 1979, Appellant assaulted and battered Simon Flax, the Boatswain, by striking him with a "4x4" wooden board. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 27 November, 3 and 14 December 1979, 17 and 20 January and 13 February 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. After the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. The entire decision was served on 31 May 1980. Appeal was timely filed on 13 June 1980 and perfected on 8 October 1980.Appeal No. 2333Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198312/5/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2334 - HARTLAGE.PDFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 3 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, North Carolina suspended Appellant's license for one month upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States SS JACKSONVILLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 October 1982, Appellant wrongfully allowed the vessel to enter the port of Wilmington, North Carolina without propulsion power, which was a hazardous condition, without first notifying the Captain of the Port, Wilmington, North Carolina as is required by 33 CFR 161.15 The hearing was held at Wilmington, North Carolina on 3 and 4 November 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2334Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/6/198312/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2335 - PRIDGENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license and document for four months, upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. The specification of the negligence charge alleges that while serving as pilot of the M/V GREAT LAKES, under authority of the license and document above captioned, on or about 9 October 1979, Appellant navigated that vessel in a negligent manner by allowing it to allide with moored construction barges at the Brightman Street Bridge, Fall River, Massachusetts. The specification of the misconduct charge alleges that while Appellant was serving as pilot he did so without a proper endorsement on his license. The Master of the vessel, Egil K. Pedersen, was also charged with negligence and misconduct. The hearing was held in joinder with that of the Master at Providence, Rhode Island on 12 October 1979, 8 November 1979, 11 December 1979 and 4 January 1980.Appeal No. 2335Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/9/198312/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2336 - SAMPSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 April 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Tampa, Florida revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding him guilty of incompetence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant while serving as Operator on board the United States S/V LA GRINGA, O.N. 530918, under authority of the license above captioned, did during the year 1981, operate said vessel from St. Petersburg Municipal Marina Tampa Bay, Florida, while physically incompetent because of inadequate vision. The hearing was held at Tampa, Florida, on 12 February 1982 and on 13 April 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and single specification thereunder The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits, one of which, Exhibit 1, was a stipulation of fact signed by both the Investigating Officer and the Appellant.Appeal No. 2336Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/9/198312/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2337 - NYBORGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California admonished Appellant. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot on board the United States SS SAN MARCOS and directing the movements of said vessel under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 12 May 1981, Appellant failed to initiate adequate and timely evasive maneuvers to avoid collision with the F/V SANDRA LINN while overtaking said vessel in the vicinity of the Bay Bridge in San Francisco Bay. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 28 July, 11,21,26 and 31 August 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence several documents and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2337Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/6/19841/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2338 - FIFER IIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 March 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that on or about 1 March 1982, Appellant was convicted of possession of cannabis (over 100 pounds) by the Circuit Court, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida on 9 December 1982 and on 20 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits. At the end of the hearing on 9 December 1982 the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. The hearing was then continued to 20 January 1983. On that day Appellant testified, called three witnesses and introduced into evidence two exhibits all directed toward mitigation and extenuation. The Administrative Law Judge's decision and order revoking all licenses and documents issued to Appellant, dated 8 March 1983, was served on 14 March 1983. Appeal was timely filed on 17 March 1983 and perfected on 4 May 1983.Appeal No. 2338Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/6/19841/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2348 - MANLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at HOUSTON, TEXAS revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the document above captioned, on or about 5 June 1981, Appellant was convicted of possession of marijuana by the County Court of Harris County, Texas. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 12 November 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the record of Appellant's conviction. In defense, Appellant made several motions related to the admissibility of the court records, the legal effect of the Texas conviction, and the legal adequacy of the Coast Guard proceeding.Appeal No. 2348Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/12/19841/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2339 - HOOTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.25-15. By order dated 11 December 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license for six months, on twelve months probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as a Licensed Operator aboard the P/C SEA HOOK, under the authority of the license above captioned on or about 19 July 1980, and 8, 19, 21, 23, 27 and 28 September 1981, Appellant transported passengers for hire onboard a foreign-built vessel, between Auke Bay, Alaska, and the vicinity of Point Retreat, Alaska. The hearing was held at Juneau, Alaska, on 17 November 1981. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and presented his evidence which consisted of his oral testimony. He offered neither documentary evidence, not evidence by deposition. He called no witnesses. The Investigating Officer presented the testimony of two witnesses as well as six documents.Appeal No. 2339Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/18/19841/18/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2340 - JAFFEEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 January 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Almeda, California suspended Appellant's license for six months, plus six months on twelve month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the United States motor vessel PILLAR POINT 3 under authority of the license above captioned, on 7 November 1982, Appellant knowingly carried passengers for hire on the PILLAR POINT 3 on a sport fishing voyage off the coast of California from Pillar Point Harbor and back to Pillar Point Harbor with the starboard engine inoperative, the starboard engine-driven bilge pump inoperative, and the starboard shaft disconnected from the reduction gear in an unsafe manner. The hearing was held at Alameda, California on 1 December 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2340Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/20/19841/20/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2341 - SCHUILINGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, N.C. admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Chief Engineer on board the United States vessel SS JACKSONVILLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 October 1982, Appellant failed to notify the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, Baltimore, Maryland, that the main propulsion motor of the vessel was flooded, that on 8 October 1982 he allowed repairs to be made to the main motor without the cognizance of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, and that on or about 13 October 1982, Appellant failed to immediately notify the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, Wilmington, N.C., of the failure at sea of the vessel's main motor. The hearing was held at Wilmington, N.C., on 4 November 1982.Appeal No. 2341Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/6/19842/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2342 - MAKRINOSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 August 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for one month, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved, alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States S/S OASIS HAWAII, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 11 March 1981, Appellant allowed his vessel to depart the port of Texas City, Texas with its load line submerged. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts, on 2 and 30 April, 28 and 29 May, 4 June, and 16 July 1981. At the hearing, appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence 14 exhibits and called four witnesses.Appeal No. 2342Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19843/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2343 - WILLIAMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 21 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's mariners document upon finding proved the charge of "possession of marijuana aboard the SS INGER." On 31 August 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from then Order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary document. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order dated 16 November 1983. Appellant's delay in filing the notice of appeal was caused by Hurricane Alicia. It will therefore be considered timely. BASIS OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge of 16 November 1983 denying a temporary document. Appellant advances no grounds for his appeal. OPINION The Administrative Law Judge's interpretation of the regulations and my Decisions on Appeal is not correct insofar as he concludes that temporary licenses or documents may not be issued following a finding that one of the offenses listed in 46 CFR 5.03-5(b) has been proved.Appeal No. 2343Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19843/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2345 - CRAWFORDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 November 1982, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y.suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 12 months, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Third Assistant Engineer on board the S.S. SANTA BARBARA under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 29 August 1982, Appellant assaulted and battered a fellow crewmember, James W. PARRISH, with a dangerous weapon, a wheel wrench. The hearing was held at New York, N.Y. on 27 October 1982. At the hearing, Appellant neither appeared nor was he represented by counsel. The Investigating Officer testified to jurisdictional facts concerning service of charges on Appellant and notice to Appellant of the date of the hearing. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf by the Administrative Law Judge and the hearing proceeded in absentia.Appeal No. 2345Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/27/19843/27/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2344 - KOHAJDAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By Order dated October 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved that while serving as ordinary seaman on board the SS PENNY under the authority of the above captioned document, while the vessel was at the Port of Tamatave, Madagascar, Appellant did: (1) On or about 0500 on 11 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty of opening cargo hatches; (2) On or about 0500 on 16 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty of opening cargo hatches; (4) On or about 1300 and 1330 on 18 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty as gangway watch, and was discovered aft of the liverpool house out of sight of the gangway; (5) On or about 0000 to 0050 on 25 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty as gangway watch; (6) On or about 0230 and 0430 on 25 Dec 1981, fail to perform his duty as gangway watch in that he was found asleep in the crew's messroom; (8) On or about 30 Dec 1981, assault and batter with his fists the vessel's Master, and threaten to kill said Master; (9) On or about 30 Dec 1981, assault the Chief Mate by threatening to kill him.Appeal No. 2344Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/28/19843/28/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2346 - WILLIAMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 May 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 12 February 1982, Appellant wrongfully and fraudulently presented to the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office, Portland, Oregon, his Merchant Mariner's Document wrongfully altered in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2197 by the addition of a "Demac" endorsement, in an attempt to obtain a duplicate document with an endorsement to which he was not entitled. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington on 11 May 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and eleven documentary exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and the specification has been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2346Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/30/19843/30/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2347 - WILLIAMS, A. DThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 January 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, NY suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Qualified Member of the Engine Department (QMED) on board the SS CHESTNUT HILL under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 9 December 1982, Appellant uttered abusive language toward the Third Assistant Engineer and on or about 29 November 1982 failed to stand his assigned watch. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, PA on 12 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification alleging failure to stand his watch and not guilty to uttering abusive language to the Third Assistant Engineer. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and three exhibits. Appellant offered no evidence in defense.Appeal No. 2347Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19844/11/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2350 - HINCHCLIFFEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 April 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of “conviction for a narcotic drug law violation.” The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while holder of the above captioned license, was convicted on 11 January 1983 by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland of conspiracy to import marijuana. The hearing was held at Key West, Florida, on 28 April 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence a certified copy of the Judgment of the Court, a copy of the Indictment, and an Affidavit of Service of the charge sheet. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, the testimony of two additional witnesses, and several documents. At the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. The Decision and Order revoking Appellant's license was served on 14 May 1983. Notice of Appeal was timely filed on 24 May 1983 and perfected on 1 August 1983.Appeal No. 2350Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19845/9/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2349 - CANADAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 June 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas, suspended Appellant's Ocean Operator's license and Merchant Mariner's document for one month on three months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Operator on board the M/V WANDA LOUISE under authority of the above captioned licenses and document on or about 3 April 1981, Appellant failed to properly supervise the transfer of oil within the vessel which failure resulted in the discharge of about 1,000 gallons of oil into the Calcasieu River, a navigable waterway of the United States. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas on 12 May 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced four exhibits and the testimony of one witness into evidence. In defense, Appellant offered his own testimony, the testimony of one witness and four exhibits.Appeal No. 2349Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/11/19845/11/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2351 - EINSMANNBy order dated 27 June 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida dismissed without prejudice a charge of negligence supported by two specifications and a charge of misconduct supported by one specification which had been served on Appellant. ISSUE The appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge. Appellant asks that the charges and specifications be dismissed with prejudice. APPEARANCE: Corlett, Killian, Hardeman, McIntosh, & Levi, P.A. by David McIntosh OPINION The first question which must be answered is whether an event has occurred which is subject to appeal. As set forth in detail below, I conclude that it has not.Appeal No. 2351Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/15/19845/15/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2352 - IAUKEAThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 August 1982, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's seaman's license for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of "inattention to duty". The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Mate on board the United States M/V CATHLAMET under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did on or about 0545, 21 April 1982 while said vessel was at the Mukilteo Ferry Terminal, Mukilteo, Washington, wrongfully fail to perform assigned duties on the vessel's car deck during unloading operations. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington on 22 June 23, June, 29, June, 30 June, 1 July and 2 July 1982. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2352Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/22/19845/22/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2353 - EDGELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana suspended Appellant's seaman's document for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Qualified Member of the Engine Department (QMED) on board the SS DELTA NORTE, under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 27 December 1982, Appellant did wrongfully engage in mutual combat with a fellow crewmember. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana on 25 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence two exhibits and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2353Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19846/4/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2354 - DITMARSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) 46 CFR 5.30-1 and 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 26 May 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Miami, Florida, revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding proved the charge of convict ion for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the license above captioned, on or about 23 December 1982 Appellant was convicted of knowingly, intentionally, and unlawfully possessing a controlled substance, to wit, marijuana. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida on 26 May 1983. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigation Officer introduced in evidence five documents including a copy of the judgement of conviction of the New Jersey Superior Court, Mercer County, in the case State of New Jersey v. Gary Neal Ditmars, and a true copy of the indictment filed in the same ease.Appeal No. 2354Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2355 - RHULEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 March 1982, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while holder of the captioned license, was convicted on 10 August 1981 of possession of narcotics, to wit, cannabis, by the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit for Broward County, Florida. The hearing was held in Miami, Florida on 12 March 1982. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence two documents. In defense, Appellant introduced various items of documentary evidence and made an unsworn statement in mitigation.Appeal No. 2355Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2356 - FOSTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V CHARGER, under the authority of the above captioned license, on or about 24 and 25 April 1981 Appellant wrongfully: operated the vessel while under the influence of intoxicating beverages while carrying passengers; molested one or more female passengers by using improper an suggestive language and placing his hands on their private parts in a lewd and lascivious manner against the female passengers' will; and used a narcotic drug by smoking a marijuana cigarette. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii on 14 May 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and to each specification.Appeal No. 2356Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2357 - GEESEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for a period of six months, remitted on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. Three specifications were found proved. The first alleges that on 7 February 1982, Appellant, while serving as second mate on board the SS PRESIDENT MADISON under authority of the above captioned documents, failed to perform his duties due to intoxication. The second and third specifications allege failure to obey direct orders of the Master to go below after being relieved of his bridge watch. The hearing was initially convened on board the SS PRESIDENT MADISON at San Francisco, California on 16 August 1982, and continued at Alameda, California on 9 November 1982, 7 February 1983, and 14 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses and several documents.Appeal No. 2357Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19846/8/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2358 - BUISSETThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C,. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 29 October 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specifications found proved under the charge of misconduct allege that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V SHARON B. under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 24 July, while said vessel was pushing the barge JEANNE MARIE in the Tangier Sound, Appellant wrongfully failed to maintain a proper lookout and wrongfully failed to take action to avoid a collision with the 19 foot motorboat, Registration No. MD-9267-P. The specification found proved under the charge of negligence alleges that while serving as aforementioned, on the same date, while said vessel was pushing the barge JEANNE MARIE in the Tangier Sound, Appellant failed to navigate the vessel with due caution, thereby causing a collision with the 19 foot motorboat, Registration No. MD-9267-P.Appeal No. 2358Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19846/8/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2362 - ARNOLDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 4l United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for ten months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able-bodied seaman on board the SS PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 12 December 1981 through 19 December 1981, Appellant wrongfully saved in the capacity noted his document was in the possession of the Coast Guard in Compliance with a Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge's order. The hearing was held in Seattle, Washington on 9 September, 20 October, and 17 December 1982. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Prior to arraignment, Appellant moved for dismissal. The motion was denied. After denial of the motion to dismiss and upon being arraigned, Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge an specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence sixteen documents. The Appellant offered no defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered and oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and single specification had been proved by plea. He then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issues to Appellant for a period of ten months. The entire decision was served on 12 January 1983. Appeal was timely filed on 22 December 1982, and perfected on 23 March 1983.Appeal No. 2362Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2363 - MANNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S. Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's Seaman's License for three months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the M/V CAPTAIN HORNBLOWER, under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did on 16 and 17 February 1981, while carrying 66 and 48 passengers respectively between the hours of 1900 and 2300 each day, wrongfully operate said vessel, a non-Coast Guard certificated vessel, in violation of the provisions of 46 U.S.C. 390c(a). The hearing was held at san Francisco, California, on 2 March, 2 April, 7 April, 1 May, 7 May, 24 June, and 7 July 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2363Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2359 - WAINEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order date 15 December 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for four months, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. The specifications found proved under the charge of negligence allege that while serving as Master on board the United States M/V AURIGA, Appellant on or about 10 August 1981, while navigating in conditions of fog and restricted visibility: (1) failed to obtain, or properly use, information available to him from radar observations to determine the course and speed of another vessel in his vicinity, thereby contributing to a collision with the SS NAUSHON; (2) failed to use the bridge-to-bridge radiotelephone to determine the course and speed of another vessel in his vicinity, thereby contributing to a collision; (3) failed to navigate with caution during fog, notwithstanding the fact that information of the proximity and approach of another vessel was available to him from radar observations.Appeal No. 2359Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Page 16 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.