| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2724 - EDENSTROM | The Coast Guard complaint charged Respondent with two allegations of misconduct. First, the complaint alleged that Respondent failed to disclose a number of medical conditions on the Form CG-719K he submitted to the Coast Guard, in support of an application for renewal of his credential. Second, the complaint alleged that Respondent committed misconduct by failing to appear for a mandated random drug test on October 8, 2015.
Respondent appeals.
FACTS
On April 2I,2015, Respondent submitted Form CG-719K, Merchant Mariner Medical Evaluation Report, dated March 27,2015, to the National Maritime Center (NMC), in support of his application for renewal of his merchant mariner credential. [CG Exs. 6 &,7; D&O at 3.] Section I of the Form CG-719K requires the applicant mariner to attest, subject to prosecution under 18 U.S.C. $ 1001, that the information provided is truthful and complete, without knowing omission. Respondent signed, and so attested. [CG Ex. 7 at3.]
Section IV of the Form CG-719K, Certification of Medical Conditions, lists 88 medical conditions. As the form states at the top of Section IV, it "must be completed by applicant, and
reviewed by verifying medical practitioner." The instructions to that section provide, "Applicants must report their relevant medical conditions to the best of their knowledge, and the verifying medical practitioner must verify the medical conditions, using the table below." Respondent's March 2015 Form CG-719K indicates that Respondent did not report any diagnosis or treatment of any of the 88 listed medical conditions. ICG Ex. 7 at 5; D&O at 3.]
The NMC issued Respondent's renewed credential, which is the credential at issue in this proceeding, on May 8,2015. [CG Ex. l; D&O at 3.] | Appeal No. 2724 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2/18/2020 | 2/18/2020 | | 4/30/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2725 - JORY | On December 5, 2008, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued a Decision and Order (D&O) revoking the Merchant Mariner credentials of Respondent Jack Anthony Jory upon finding that Respondent posed a security risk and a threat to the safety of a marine vessel, a basis for suspension or revocation of a credential under 46 U.S.C. $ 7703(5). The factual allegation supporting the Coast Guard's Complaint alleged that on November 3,2008, Respondent threatened the life of the Master of the MA/ SEA FOX (O.N 551454).
Respondent appealed the D&O. Respondent's appeal was rejected and the D&O was affirmed via Commandant Decision on Appeal dated December 22,2010 (Appeal Decision 2691 (JORY), 2010 WL s79033s).
On June 30,2015, Respondent mailed a "Petition to Reopen," which was received at the Docketing Center on July 9,2015. On July 16,2015, the ALJ issued an Order Denying Respondent's Motion to Reopen. On July 28,2015, Respondent filed a Motion to Reconsider. The ALJ denied this request via an Order dated July 31,2015. Respondent now appeals the denial of his petition to reopen. In brief, Respondent, while serving aboard M/V SEA FOX on November 3, 2008, told the Master of M/V SEA FOX, "I will kill you." In events leading up to the statement, Respondent lunged at the Master while trying to grab a paper out of the Master's hand and struck the Master's hand, knocking a pen to the floor. In his findings, the ALJ characterized that action as an assault. On appeal, Respondent contended that no assault occurred, and also that it was improper to find an assault since he was not charged with assault. The appeal decision rejected both contentions. Respondent also contended that the ALJ erred in failing to grant a subpoena at issue on appeal had been made more than
a month after the record was closed and the D&O was issued. Accordingly, the contention concerning the subpoena, too, was rejected. | Appeal No. 2725 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/8/2020 | 3/8/2020 | | 4/30/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2728 - DILLON | On September 6, 2018, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued findings and conclusions from the bench, finding the Coast Guard's Complaint against the Merchant Mariner Credential of Respondent Michael John Dillon proved, and ordering the revocation of Respondent's credential.
The Coast Guard complaint charged Respondent with use of a dangerous drug, based upon a positive result in a government-mandated periodic drug test.
Respondent appeals.
FACTS
At all times relevant to these proceedings, Respondent was the holder of a Merchant Mariner Credential issued to him by the United States Coast Guard. [CG Ex. 1].
On January 29,2018, Respondent submitted to a government -mandated periodic urine drug test, pursuant to an application for raise-in-grade of his credential. [Tr. Vol. II at 144.]
Pursuant to regulation, the sample provided by Respondent was a "split sample": the urine sample was divided by the collector into two separate specimen containers-the primary specimen and the split specimen. [Tr. Vol. I at34-35,86-90.] Respondent signed a Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form (DTCCF) for provision of his urine specimen. [Tr. Vol II at 144.1 Respondent's primary urine specimen was tested on January 30 by Alere Toxicology.
That test retuned a positive result for marijuana metabolites. [Tr. Vol. II at 144.) Results of the test were forwarded to a medical review officer (MRO). [id.] | Appeal No. 2728 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/8/2020 | 4/8/2020 | | 6/2/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2726 - BADUA | By an Order dated October 17,2A19, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard denied as untimely what he construed to be Respondent Mr. Jeffrey John Badua, Jr.'s request for a hearing on the Coast Guard's Notice of Failure to Complete Settlement Agreement (Respondent's request was captioned "Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement").
Respondent appeals.
At all relevant times, Respondent held a Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) issued by the United States Coast Guard. On February 27,2018, Respondent took a required preemployment drug test, pursuant to 46 CFR Part 16. The urine sample provided by Respondent tested positive for hydromorphone. Respondent maintains that the positive result was the result of a one-time, inadvertent use of another person's prescription medication.
The Coast Guard issued its Complaint against Respondent's MMC on April 13, 2018, for use of a dangerous drug, in violation of 46 USC § 7704(c). On April 30,2018, the Coast Guard and Respondent entered into a Settlement Agreement. By signing the Settlement Agreement, Respondent admitted the jurisdictional and factual allegations of the Coast Guard Complaint. The Settlement Agreement provided that Respondent's MMC was revoked, but that the revocation would be stayed in order to allow Respondent to complete the elements of "cure" from use or addiction to use of a dangerous drug. See 46 U.S.C. § 7704;33 CFR § 20.502;46 CFR § 5.901(d); Appeal Decision 2535 (SWEENEY), 1992 WL I 2008768. | Appeal No. 2726 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/27/2020 | 4/27/2020 | | 5/20/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2727 - BOUDREAUX II | On October 18, 2018, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued findings and conclusions from the bench, finding the Coast Guard's Complaint against the Merchant Mariner Credential of Respondent Robert Ryan Boudreaux proved, and ordering the suspension of Respondent's credential for 90 days, with a further suspension of six months suspended on nine months probation.
That Coast Guard Complaint alleged misconduct in that Respondent served aboard a vessel under the authority of his credential from October 25 to November 13 , 2017, in violation
of an ALJ order suspending that credential.
FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
At all times relevant to these proceedings, Respondent was the holder of a Merchant Mariner Credential issued by the United States Coast Guard (MMC).
On October 18,2016, the Coast Guard filed a Complaint against Respondent's MMC alleging that Respondent had committed an act of misconduct by failing to comply with his marine employer's drug and alcohol policy. See Appeal Decision 2723 (BOUDREAUX Ð (2019) at 3, 2019 WL 8137712 at 2. That Complaint was assigned Coast Guard ALJ docket number 2016-0332.
The hearing in that matter was convened by ALJ Bruce T. Smith on July 11,2017. At the conclusion of the hearing, the ALJ retuned Respondent's MMC to his possession, with the understanding that this allowed Respondent to continue working under the authority of his credential, pending decision in his case. [Respondent Ex. 3 (CG-ALJ 2016-0332Tr. Vol. II at 226-28).1 | Appeal No. 2727 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/28/2020 | 4/28/2020 | | 5/20/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2729 - COOK | The Coast Guard complaint charged Respondent with use of a dangerous drug, based upon a positive result in a government-mandated random drug test. The D&O found the charge proved and revocation appropriate, and directed Respondent to surrender his credential.
However, because Respondent had already made substantial progress toward cure, the D&O provided for a future hearing to evaluate Respondent's evidence of cure. Respondent filed a
notice of appeal from the D&O.
On April 17, 2019, the ALJ issued a Cure Order, finding Respondent had demonstrated cure from the use of a dangerous drug by completion of a drug rehabilitation program and demonstration of twelve months of non-association. The Cure Order directed the return of Respondent's credential, and converted the period of revocation served to a period of outright
suspension. The Coast Guard appealed.
Both Respondent's appeal from the D&O and the Coast Guard's appeal from the Cure Order are now ripe for decision.
The ALJ's findings and decision were lawful, based on correct interpretation of the law, and supported by the evidence. The Decision and Order's finding of proved as to a charge of
drug use against Respondent was consistent with applicable law and public policy, and the mandatory sanction of revocation was properly ordered. The Cure Order's finding of cure, and conversion of the order of revocation into one of outright suspension was justified. No further action against Respondent's credential is warranted in these circumstances. | Appeal No. 2729 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 7/6/2020 | 7/6/2020 | | 7/17/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2730 - BLAKE | Commandant Decision on Appeal, denying the Coast Guard's appeal, and affirming the ALJ's decision and order finding proved both charges, for violation of law and misconduct, for possession of a handgun onboard a documented vessel, with order of 12-month outright suspension | Appeal No. 2730 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 7/17/2020 | 7/17/2020 | | 8/7/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2731 - MCLIN | Commandant Decision on Appeal, denying the Coast Guard's appeal, and affirming the ALJ's decision and order finding proved charges of misconduct and dangerous drug use, and revoking Respondent's MMC. | Appeal No. 2731 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 7/23/2020 | 7/23/2020 | | 8/7/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2732 - CAMP | On April 16, 2019, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard dismissed the Coast Guard's complaint against Respondent Christopher Joseph Camp, in a bench ruling. The complaint alleged two counts of misconduct, for refusing to submit to a drug test required by 46 CFR Part 16 and required by company policy. The Coast Guard appeals.
On June 29, 2018, the Coast Guard filed a Complaint charging Respondent with two counts of misconduct. The first count charged
Respondent with refusing to submit to a drug test required by 46 CFR Part 16 by failing to remain at the collection site until the testing process was complete. The second count charged Respondent with violation of his employer's company policy, requiring compliance with drug testing procedures, by failing to remain at the collection site until the testing process was complete. Both charges were based on an April 24, 2018, random drug test in Morgan City, Louisiana. | Appeal No. 2732 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 11/10/2020 | 11/10/2020 | | 11/17/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2733 - SCHWIEMAN | On Septernber 13, 2019, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued a Decision & Order (D&O), finding proved against Respondent Daniel Walter Schwieman one charge of violation of regulation, for carriage of more than six passengers for hire on an uninspected vessel of less than 100 gross tons, in violation of 46 CFR $ 176.100(a). The ALJ ordered Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) suspended for one month outright, on six months probation. The Coast Guard appeals.
The vessel ALLORA is a vessel of 20 gross tons and is owned by Offshore,LLC ("Offshore"). [D&O at 5; CG Ex. 5, 6.] On June 16, 20T8, the vessel ALLORA did not have a Certificate of Inspection (COf. [D&O at5,Tr. at69.]
Ms. M. Nichols ("the charterer") entered into a charter agreement with Offshore, for use of the ALLORA on June 16,2018. [D&O at 5; CG Ex. 3 at 52-55; Tr. at 159-161.] The charter agreement required the charterer to only use a "qualified operator and crew," and included a "weather policy'' that reserved Offshore's right to cancel or delay the charter in the event of dangerous weather conditions, "even if you and the captain believe they are safe." [CG Ex. 5 at 52-53.1 The charterer paid $ 1,200 for use of the vessel. [D&O at 5; Tr. at 66, 16l.]
On June 16,2018, Respondent operated the ALLORA, as master, on the waters of Lake Michigan, with the charterer and eleven passengers on board. [D&O at 5; Tr. at65-69,160; CG Ex. 3 at 49-57.1 Lake Michigan is a navigable water of the United States. [D&O at 5.]
CONCLUSION
The ALJ's ultimate findings and conclusions were neither erroneous nor an abuse of discretion. His decision complies with 33 CFR $ 20902, and he exercised his lawful discretion in assessing the credibility of the evidence presented. | Appeal No. 2733 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 11/20/2020 | 11/20/2020 | | 11/24/2020 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2735 - ROBB | FACTS
At all times relevant to these proceedings, Respondent was the holder of a Merchant Mariner Credential issued to him by the United States Coast Guard. [D&O at 4, 24.]
On August 31, 2018, Respondent was a crewmember of the SLNC PAX, which had been selected for random drug testing. [D&O at 4.] On August 31, 2018, Respondent provided a urine sample to a certified specimen collector. [Id.] He signed the Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form (CCF), and initialed the seals that are intended to be placed on the specimen bottles while the seals were still attached to the CCF. [Id. at 5.] The collector poured
Respondent's sample into two specimen bottles and sealed the bottles in Respondent's presence. [Id.]
Respondent's specimen was tested by a laboratory accredited to perform drug testing comporting with Department of Transportation (DOT) standards. The laboratory determined that Respondent's sample was positive for amphetamines at a level of 552 ng/mL and for methamphetamines at a level of 9057 ng/mL, exceeding the cut-off levels for positive tests found in DOT regulations. [D&O at 6, 25.]
BASES OF APPEAL
Respondent raises the following issues on appeal:
I The ALJ's Ultimate Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Nos. 5 and 8 are not supported by substantial evidence.
II. The ALI abused his discretion by relying upon inherently incredible testimony. | Appeal No. 2735 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 8/17/2021 | 8/17/2021 | | 8/30/2021 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2736 FREMEN | On May 5, 2021, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued an Order of Default (OD) for Respondent Derrick Thomas Fremen's failure to attend prehearing conferences, finding proved the Coast Guard's Amended Complaint filed on February 18, 2021 (Amended Complaint) against the Merchant Mariner Credential of Respondent, and ordering the revocation of Respondent's credential.
CONCLUSION
The ALJ's decision to issue an Order of Default was not an abuse of discretion. The order imposed by the ALJ, revoking Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential, was not excessive. There is no reason to disturb the AU's Order. | Appeal No. 2736 | Appeal No. 2723 | 11/22/2021 | 11/22/2021 | | 12/1/2021 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2737 - STINZIANO | On April 20, 2022, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued a Decision and Order (D&O), finding proved three charges of misconduct against the Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) of Respondent Mark Steven Stinziano. The ALJ ordered Respondent's credential suspended for four months outright, with a further suspension of eight months suspended on twelve months probation.
CONCLUSION
Concerning Charges 1, 2, and 6 and the allegations in Charge 5 relating to the Second Mate, the ALJ' s findings and rulings were lawful and consistent with law and precedent. He exercised his lawful discretion in assessing the credibility of the evidence presented. In view of uncertainties with respect to the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 2246(3), the case will be remanded.
ORDER
The ALJ's Order dated April 20, 2022, is set aside and the case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion. | Appeal No. 2737 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/6/2023 | 1/6/2023 | | 3/14/2023 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2255 - BASIR | This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United
States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1.
By order dated October 10, 1979, an Administrative Law Judge
of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months, plus 4 months on 12
months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as Able
Seaman on board SS DELTA BOLIVIA under authority of the document
above captioned, on or about 2 December 1978, Appellant failed to
perform his duties because of intoxication; failed to obey direct
orders of the Third Mate and of the Chief Mate; wrongfully consumed
alcoholic beverages aboard DELTA BOLIVIA, and used foul and abusive
language toward the Third Mate.
The hearing was held on 15 February, 3 and 5 April, 11, 14,
and 29 May, and 11 and 28 June 1979.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specifications.
The Investigating Officer submitted three exhibits and the
sworn testimony of four witnesses.
In defense, Appellant submitted eight exhibits and his own
testimony. | Appeal No. 2255 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 6/10/1981 | 6/10/9181 | | 12/21/2017 |