CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2299 - BLACKWELL IIIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 20 February 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct, Four specifications under a charge of misconduct, Charge II, were found proved. They allege that while serving on board the M/V CAN'T MISS, O.N. 294101, under authority of the Ocean Operator's license above captioned, on or about 12 April 1980, Appellant wrongfully operated the vessel while carrying passengers: 1. By operating beyond the scope of the route authorized on the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, to wit: over 20 miles from shore, in violation of 46 U.S. Code 390(b); 2. By using a portable gasoline stove for cooking in violation of 46 U.S.Code 170 and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 184.05-1; 3. By operating with unserviceable life preservers in violation of 46 U.S. Code 390(b) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 180.25; and 4. By operating with improperly secured life saving equipment, to wit: water light attached to buoyant apparatus was tied to the vessel in such a manner as to preclude being readily launched, in violation of 46 U.S. Code 390(b) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 180.15-1 and 180.20-1.Appeal No. 2299Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/7/19834/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2308 - GRAYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 20 September 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's License for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Ocean Operator aboard the United States vessel C. DOMINATOR under authority of the license above captioned, on various dates between 12 May and 6 July 1982, Appellant wrongfully operated said vessel, a passenger vessel, without having on board an unexpired Certificate of Inspection. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 20 September 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2308Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/5/19835/5/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2319 - PAVELECThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 21 January 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license for one month, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V CANDY STORE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 5 November 1981, Appellant failed to maintain a proper lookout which contributed to the collision between the M/V CANDY STORE and the F/V MISS LAVON. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas on 8 December 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by profesional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2319Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19839/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2328 - MINTZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 21 July 1981, an administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months, plus three months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Officer's Bedroom Steward on board the SS PRESIDENT McKINLEY under authority of the above captioned document, on or about 4 May 1981, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties by absenting himself from his duty station without permission at 1300 hours. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 2 and 30 June 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced four documents into evidence.Appeal No. 2328Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/4/198310/4/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2341 - SCHUILINGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, N.C. admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Chief Engineer on board the United States vessel SS JACKSONVILLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 October 1982, Appellant failed to notify the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, Baltimore, Maryland, that the main propulsion motor of the vessel was flooded, that on 8 October 1982 he allowed repairs to be made to the main motor without the cognizance of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, and that on or about 13 October 1982, Appellant failed to immediately notify the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, Wilmington, N.C., of the failure at sea of the vessel's main motor. The hearing was held at Wilmington, N.C., on 4 November 1982.Appeal No. 2341Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/6/19842/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2307 - GABOURYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for one month, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States T/V ALLEGIANCE under authority of the license above captioned, on 19 December 1979, Appellant operated or allowed the said vessel to be operated in an unsafe condition in that the following hazardous conditions existed: 1. Excessive cargo product accumulation in the bilges of the amidships pumproom; 2. No. 10 cargo pump in aft pumproom leaking from both shafts; 3. No. 11 cargo pump in aft pumproom leaking excessively from packing gland; 4. No. 5 cargo pump suction line holed and leaking in amidships pumproom; 5. No. 5 cargo line riser valve in amidships pumproom leaking; 6. No. 12 cargo pump discharge riser in aft pumproom repaired with a cement patch; 7. Port bulkhead stop valve on suction line in aft pumproom leaking through packing gland. The hearing was held at Melville, Rhode Island and Boston, Massachusetts on 28 January, 11 and 26 February, 11 March, 16 April and 12 June 1980.Appeal No. 2307Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19835/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2292 - COLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida suspended Appellant's captioned license for two months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specifications of Charge 1 (misconduct), found proved, alleged that while serving as operator/person in charge on board the United States M/V GREEN COVE O.N. 587880, under authority of the license above captioned, from 16 March 1981 to 24 March 1981, Appellant wrongfully undertook a voyage in excess of 12 hours with one licensed operator and did wrongfully absent himself from the wheelhouse for a period of approximately 1-1/2 hours on 23 March 1981, leaving the responsibility of navigation of the vessel and tow to an unlicensed deckhand. The specification of Charge II (negligence), found proved, alleged that while serving as above on 23 March 1981, Appellant failed to post a proper watch in said vessel's pilot house thereby contributing to the collision between its tow and M/B FL 8158 BN, with loss of life.Appeal No. 2292Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/4/19833/4/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2294 - TITTONISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months, and awarded an additional suspension of twelve months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master on board SS LASH ATLANTICO under authority of the captioned license on or about 6 May 1981, Appellant negligently failed to navigate at a safe speed, negligently failed to use all available means to determine if a risk of collision existed or a close quarters situation was developing, and negligently made a succession of small course alterations thereby contributing to the collision of SS LASH ATLANTICO and M/V HELLENIC CARRIER. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 27, 28, and 29 May and 29 June 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses, two photographs, a chart, and two other documents. He also requested the Administrative Law Judge to take judicial notice of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, Title 33 U.S.C. foll.1602 (hereafter cited COLREGS, 1972, Rule ).Appeal No. 2294Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/29/19833/29/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2296 - SABOWSKIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 September 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license No. 500466 for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Master on board the United States SS EXXON CHESTER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 18 June 1979, Appellant wrongfully failed: (1) to navigate said vessel at a safe speed adapted to the prevailing conditions of visibility; (2) to take avoiding action in ample time to avoid collision; and, (3) to reduce the speed of said vessel to the minimum at which she would be kept on course, upon having heard the fog signal of another vessel apparently forward of the beam. The hearing was held at New York City on 19 March, and continued on 20 March, 10 April, and 15 April 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each pecification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence 25 exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2296Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/20/19833/20/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2314 - CREWSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 April 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's document, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. One specification found proved alleged that while serving as Bosun on board the SS SANTA LUCIA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 2 November 1980, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a fellow crewmember by striking him in the face with his fist. A second specification found proved alleged a simple assault on 3 November 1980 on another crewmember. Additionally found proved are four specifications of either wrongful absence or wrongful failure to perform duties, none of which exceeds one day in duration, between 23 October 1980 and 2 January 1981. The hearing, in four sessions, was held at New York, New York on 12 January and 16 January 1981 and at Jacksonville, Florida on 30 January and 15 April 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and to specifications one through five and of guilty to specification six alleging a wrongful failure to report for duty at 0800 and 1300, 2 January 1981 while the SS SANTA LUCIA was at anchor at Callao, Peru.Appeal No. 2314Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19835/23/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2289 - ROGERSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 September 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas revoked the seaman's document of Appellant, upon finding her guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that, while serving as a Steward/Utility on board USNS MAUMEE under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant (1) did on 18 January 1981 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully assault with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a pair of scissors, a member of the crew, John M. Wilson; and (2) did on 12, 13, 14, and 15 January 1981 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully refuse to perform her duties by "not turning to." Appellant did not appear at the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence nine documents including certified copies of official log entries of the USNS MAUMEE.Appeal No. 2289Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/27/19832/27/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2216 - SORENSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 April 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as pilot on board the SS CHANCELLORSVILLE under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 9 December 1978, Appellant failed to navigate with caution in the vicinity of Courthouse Point, Maryland, thereby resulting in said vessel running around. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 24, 25 January, and 8, 14 and 15 February 1979. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2216Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2332 - LORENZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 April 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license for one month, on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Engineer on board the United States vessel SS AMERICAN HAWK under authority of the above captioned license, on or about 23 January 1982, Appellant did fail to maintain a proper quantity of fuel on board the vessel to complete the voyage which commenced on 12 January 1982 from Jacksonville, Florida. As a result the vessel lost all power adjacent to the Galveston Bay Entrance Channel Lighted Buoy 7A, hazarding navigation and the vessel. The hearing was held at Galveston, Texas on 23 March 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2332Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198312/5/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2347 - WILLIAMS, A. DThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 January 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, NY suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Qualified Member of the Engine Department (QMED) on board the SS CHESTNUT HILL under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 9 December 1982, Appellant uttered abusive language toward the Third Assistant Engineer and on or about 29 November 1982 failed to stand his assigned watch. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, PA on 12 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification alleging failure to stand his watch and not guilty to uttering abusive language to the Third Assistant Engineer. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and three exhibits. Appellant offered no evidence in defense.Appeal No. 2347Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19844/11/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2197 - GAINESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 July 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, after a hearing at Baltimore, Maryland, on 12 April and 6 July 1978, suspended Appellant's license and document for a period of four months and further suspended them for a period of two months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The three specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant while serving as Radio Officer aboard SS JOHN B. WATERMAN, under authority of the captioned document, did, on or about 23 March 1977, while said vessel was in the port of Long Beach, California, wrongfully refuse to obey a lawful command of the master to produce the radio log for an official inspection by the Federal Communication Commission Inspector; (2) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did, on or about 23 March 1977, wrongfully fail to maintain the vessel's radio-telegraph log as required by the 1960 SOLAS Convention, Chapter 4, regulation 16, paragraphs (a) and (b); and (3) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did, on or about 23 March 1977, wrongfully refuse to make the vessel's radio-telegraph log available for inspection as required by the 1960 SOLAS Convention,Chapter 4, regulation 16, paragraph (c). (The third specification was merged with the first, and, as so merged, was found proved.)Appeal No. 2197Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/27/19803/27/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2295 - AMOURYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 March 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Engine Utilityman on board the SS TRAVELER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 3 March 1981 Appellant wrongfully possessed hashish while the vessel was in the port of Navlakhi, India. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 17 March 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a certification of the shipping articles and a certified copy of the official log of the vessel. In defense, Appellant offered the testimony of a shipmate and his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on Appellant on 30 March 1981. Appeal was timely filed on 6 April 1981 and perfected on 22 July 1981.Appeal No. 2295Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/30/19833/30/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2258 - HOPKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Second Mate on board SS MONTPELIER VICTORY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 January 1979, Appellant: -negligently navigated the said vessel by failing to ascertain the said vessel's position between approximately 1600 and 1650; -did negligently plot upon the chart the 1610 fix incorrectly; -did negligently alter the vessel's course from 287° gyro to 300° without first properly fixing the vessel's position, contributing to the grounding of the said vessel; and -did negligently turn over the deck watch to the Third Officer, Walter S. BENECKY, without properly advising him of the vessel's position, thereby contributing to the grounding of the said vessel. The Administrative Law Judge found that the latter two specifications were proved as matters in aggravation with respect to the first two specifications found proved, and not as independent offenses.Appeal No. 2258Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2281 - BROMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States M/V W.W. HOLLOWAY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 September 1979, Appellant departed the port of Milwaukee, WI, for Chicago, IL, and traversed Lake Michigan without the required licensed personnel aboard as required by the vessel's certificate of inspection, to wit: the vessel sailed without the second mate having the proper endorsement to be a first class pilot upon Lake Michigan. The hearing was held at Chicago, IL on 18 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and three documents. The Appellant did not testify, call witnesses or introduce any documents.Appeal No. 2281Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/16/19828/16/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2283 - FUEHRThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the United States M/V W.W. HOLLOWAY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 September 1979, Appellant wrongfully departed the port of Milwaukee, WI, for Chicago, IL, and traversed Lake Michigan without the required endorsement on his license to wit: first class pilot upon the waters of Lake Michigan. The hearing was held at Chicago, IL on 18 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and three documents.Appeal No. 2283Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/24/19828/24/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2334 - HARTLAGE.PDFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 3 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, North Carolina suspended Appellant's license for one month upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States SS JACKSONVILLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 October 1982, Appellant wrongfully allowed the vessel to enter the port of Wilmington, North Carolina without propulsion power, which was a hazardous condition, without first notifying the Captain of the Port, Wilmington, North Carolina as is required by 33 CFR 161.15 The hearing was held at Wilmington, North Carolina on 3 and 4 November 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2334Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/6/198312/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2249 - DURANDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 November 1979, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for three months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The amended specification found proved alleged that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V PILOT, O.N. 580326, under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 22 September 1977, Appellant operated said vessel in the Southwest lane, in contravention of the Strait of Dover Traffic Separation Scheme promulgated under authority of IMCO Resolution A. 284 (VIII), 20 November 1973. A second amended specification, that Appellant did ship and discharge seaman without filing a report as required by 46 U.S.C. 643(1), was found not proved. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 23 April, 23 July, 28 September, and 4 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence thirteen documentary exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2249Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19816/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2320 - MINTZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 September 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's document for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that, while serving as Steward Utility on board the SS PRESIDENT POLK under authority of the above captioned document Appellant: (1) on or about 2 December 1979 failed to obey the order of the Chief Steward to mop and buff passenger deck passageways and to clean the passenger lounge and card room; (2) on or about 2 December 1979 created a disturbance in the Purser's foyer by using loud exclamations and profanity to the Chief Steward; (3) on 7 December 1979 failed to obey the order of the Chief Steward to clean the garbage room; and (4) on 8 December 1979 failed to obey the order of the Chief Steward to clean the garbage room. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 5 February, 14 and 17 April, 20 May, 10 and 12 June and 17 September.Appeal No. 2320Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/7/19839/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2360 - WILKINS.PDFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 September 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board M/V FREEDOM under authority of the above captioned license on or about 28 January 1981, Appellant exceeded the scope of his license by navigating the enrolled, coastwise, seagoing barge OCEAN 193, while not on the high seas, without having on board a properly licensed pilot as required. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida on 7 July 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was not present but was represented by professional counsel. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf. A stipulation of facts was entered into between Appellant's counsel and the Investigating Officer. The Investigating Officer also introduced in evidence an additional document and stipulated to Appellant's negative prior record.Appeal No. 2360Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2342 - MAKRINOSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 August 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for one month, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved, alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States S/S OASIS HAWAII, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 11 March 1981, Appellant allowed his vessel to depart the port of Texas City, Texas with its load line submerged. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts, on 2 and 30 April, 28 and 29 May, 4 June, and 16 July 1981. At the hearing, appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence 14 exhibits and called four witnesses.Appeal No. 2342Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19843/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2340 - JAFFEEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 January 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Almeda, California suspended Appellant's license for six months, plus six months on twelve month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the United States motor vessel PILLAR POINT 3 under authority of the license above captioned, on 7 November 1982, Appellant knowingly carried passengers for hire on the PILLAR POINT 3 on a sport fishing voyage off the coast of California from Pillar Point Harbor and back to Pillar Point Harbor with the starboard engine inoperative, the starboard engine-driven bilge pump inoperative, and the starboard shaft disconnected from the reduction gear in an unsafe manner. The hearing was held at Alameda, California on 1 December 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2340Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/20/19841/20/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2251 - FADLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The one specification found proved alleges that while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 5 August 1970, Appellant was convicted by the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of New York, a court of record, for violation of Section 220.05 of the Penal Law of the State of New York, for criminal possession of a dangerous drug, to wit; Hashish. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 25 July 1980. Appellant did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, which was held in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documents.Appeal No. 2251Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2365 - EASTMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 August 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Maine suspended Appellant's license for two months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. The specification found proved under the charge of negligence alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V VIKING SUN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 21 June 1981, Appellant continued the voyage of the M/V VIKING SUN into hazardous waters after the starboard engine stalled. The specifications found proved under the charge of misconduct allege that Appellant wrongfully: (1) failed to provide the passengers with emergency procedures in accordance with 46 CFR 185.25-1 and (2) operated the M/V VIKING SUN while carrying passengers without a valid certificate of inspection. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine on 15, 16, and 17 June 1982.Appeal No. 2365Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/10/19847/10/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2371 - MCFATEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Assistant Engineer on board the M/V WARRIOR under authority of the above captioned documents did, on or about 16 September 1980, wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Engineer, Mr. Matthew P. Laving, with a deadly weapon, to wit, a knife, and inflicted severe bodily harm while the vessel was underway in San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 25 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced five documents and the testimony of two witnesses into evidence. In defense, Appellant introduced his own testimony into evidence.Appeal No. 2371Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/27/19849/27/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2254 - YOUNGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 6 March 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as fireman-watertender on board SS AFRICAN NEPTUNE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 October 1977, Appellant had in his possession 1909.2 grams of marijuana, a controlled substance. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on December 13, 1978 and continued through February 7, 1979. At the initial hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The counsel representing Appellant at the hearing before the Administrative Law Judge failed to appear on several occasions, despite agreed dates. On 8 January 1979, the hearing proceeded without the presence of Appellant's counsel. At a subsequent session counsel did appear, and was afforded the opportunity of recalling the principal witness presented by the Investigating Officer. Appellant is now represented by substitute counsel.Appeal No. 2254Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/22/19817/22/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2234 - REIMANNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 7 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for two months, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board SS AVILA under authority of the license above captioned, at or about 0830, 19 June 1979, Appellant negligently failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the overfilling of Number 3 starboard tank and subsequent spilling of a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. The hearing was held at Embarcadero Center, Suite 310, San Francisco, California, on 27 July, 16 August, 20 August, 5 September, and 14 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and, in Appellant's absence from the first session, a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf.Appeal No. 2234Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2291 - JOSEPHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 7 October 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard M/V LADY ALICE, under authority of the captioned document, on 19 July 1981, Appellant assaulted and battered by cutting with a broken coffee cup, a member of the crew, James Burnham, while said vessel was underway on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas on 10 September 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2291Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/1/19833/1/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2272 - PITTSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 March 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month, plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of one charge of negligence and one charge of misconduct. The respective supporting specifications found proved alleged: that while serving as Operator on board the M/V MORANIA #16 and Tow Barge MORANIA #400 under authority of the license above captioned on 19 February 1980, Appellant's flotilla collided with berth 2 of South Carolina State Ports Authority Columbia Street Terminal in Charleston, South Carolina; and that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, wrongfully exceeded the scope of his license by navigating from the high seas into inland waters to wit: Charleston Harbor, S.C., without having aboard a properly licensed pilot as required by 46 U.S.C. 364. A third charge, sounding in "Violation of Law," was found not proved. The hearing was held at Charleston, South Carolina on May 22, 1980.Appeal No. 2272Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/30/19823/30/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2279 - LEWISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated February 11, 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The amended specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Wiper on board the SS DELTA SUD under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 February 1981, Appellant wrongfully possessed a narcotic drug aboard the vessel, to wit: marijuana and did wrongfully engage in disorderly conduct by using foul and abusive language to both the officers of the DELTA SUD and Coast Guard marine inspectors. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 11 February 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five exhibits. In defense Appellant testified on his own behalf. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and both specifications had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2279Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/16/19827/16/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2322 - SHAWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order rendered 16 February 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleged that, while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 17 August 1981, Appellant was convicted by the Twenty-Third Judicial District Court of St. James Parish, Louisiana, a court of record, for violation of Sections 967(A) and (C) of 40 Louisiana Revised Statutes, a narcotic drug law violation. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 8 December 1981, 12 January 1982 and 27 January 1982, At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits.Appeal No. 2322Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/7/19839/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2200 - GARDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(G) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order rendered 2 March 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving that while serving as Tankerman on board the Tank Barge NMS-3103 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 21 August 1978, Appellant failed to adequately supervise cargo loading operations, causing an overflow and pollution of the navigable waters of the upper Mississippi River near Pine Bend, Minnesota. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on 2 January and 2 March 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered in his behalf by the Administrative Law Judge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence depositions of one witness, and three exhibits. Appellant offered no evidence in defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of one month on six months' probation. The entire decision was served on 19 April 1979. Appeal was timely filed on 19 March 1979 and perfected on the same day.Appeal No. 2200Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/8/19804/8/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2293 - RUBYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By orders dated 31 March and 8 April 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland admonished Appellants, Peter S. Smith and Alexander Ruby, Jr., who were Master and Chief Engineer of the SS JACKSONVILLE, respectively. The specification of the misconduct charge alleges that while serving as Master and Chief Engineer of the vessel under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 21 January 1981, Appellants did not fail to notify the nearest Coast Guard Marine Safety Office of repairs affecting the safety of the vessel, namely, boiler tube plugging repairs. The hearing was held in joinder at Baltimore, Maryland on 30 January 1981. At the hearing, Appellants were represented by the same counsel. Both Appellants entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of four witnesses and one document. In defense, the Appellants offered in evidence the testimony of one witness and three documents. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification against Appellants were proved. He then served written orders of admonition on Appellants.Appeal No. 2293Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/21/19833/21/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2393 - STEWARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-l. By order dated 3 August l982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for two months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as undocking master on board the M/V AL-TAHA, under authority of the captioned license on 19 January 1982, Appellant did navigate the M/V AL-TAHA aground on a charted shoal in Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. The hearing was conducted in Boston, Massachusetts, on 12 and 14 April and 3 May 1982. At the hearing Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and eighteen exhibits.Appeal No. 2393Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/5/19857/5/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2297 - FOEDISCHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.3-1. By order dated 13 July 1981, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Ordinary Seaman on board the SS JOHN LYKES, O.N. 282772 under authority of the captioned document, on or about 9 May 1980, Appellant wrongfully possessed approximately 12.5 grams of marijuana, a narcotic. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington on 8 December 1980, 5 February 1981 and 22 June 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six documents and a deposition. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf and offered eight documents in evidence. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months. The entire decision was served on 14 July 1981. Appeal was timely filed on 27 July 1981 and perfected on 26 October 1981.Appeal No. 2297Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/6/19834/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2246 - CONWAYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 March 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Tankerman on board the TANK BARGE E 21, under authority of the document above captioned, at or about 20 July 1979, while the barge was moored in Perth Amboy, New Jersey, Appellant wrongfully caused the opening of the manifold valve before the hose connections were complete, thus permitting a harmful quantity of oil to spill into the Raritan River, a navigable water of the United States. The hearing was held at New York at various time from 16 August 1979, to 14 March of 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence three written statements, two documents, his own testimony, and that of a witness.Appeal No. 2246Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19816/3/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2238 - MONTGOMERYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and Title 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 March 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Electrician on board SS MORMACARGO under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 29 October 1979, Appellant had in his possession a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 20 December 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and four documents.Appeal No. 2238Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/4/19813/4/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2298 - GRAVESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239b and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleged that while holding the document and license above captioned, on or about 12 December 1979, Appellant was convicted in the 180th District Court of Harris County, Texas, a court of record, for the possession of marijuana in a quantity of more than four ounces. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 15 July 1980. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty, which was later changed to not guilty, to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2298Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/6/19834/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2374 - JETERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 (b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as fleet chef aboard the SS EXXON SAN FRANCISCO, under the authority of the document above captioned, on or about 24 December 1981, while the vessel was at sea, Appellant did wrongfully rape a crew member of the vessel, namely, Robin Casson. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas 14 December 1982, 22 and 24 January 1983, 9 February 1983 and 13 and 15 April 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses, transcripts of depositions of six additional witnesses, and seven other exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, the testimony of two additional witnesses, transcripts of depositions of four witnesses, and three other exhibits.Appeal No. 2374Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/23/198411/23/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2392 - BUSINELLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 July 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license and document for one month plus an additional two months on six months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master aboard the M/V POINT CHALEUR, under authority of the captioned documents, Appellant did, on or about 4 May 1984, operate the M/V POINT CHALEUR without a licensed chief engineer on board as required by the vessel's Certificate of Inspection. The hearing was held at Corpus Christi, Texas, on 5 June 1984. At the hearing, Appellant elected to represent himself and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence his own testimony and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2392Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/13/19856/13/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2366 - MONAGHANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 December 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's mariner's license for two months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V STEEL PIONEER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 7 May 1983, Appellant navigated his flotilla in such a manner that the port lead barge allided with the guidewall at Markland Lock, Ohio River. The hearing was held at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on 18 August 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2366Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/16/19847/16/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2417 - YOUNGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 24 January 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct and upon finding him incompetent to serve on board merchant vessels of the United States. The misconduct charge is supported by six specifications which allege that Appellant, while serving as Able-Bodied Seaman aboard the TT BAY RIDGE under the authority of his document, on or about 1 January 1984, did wrongfully: (1) fail to perform his prescribed duties as lookout while the TT BAY RIDGE was underway in the Pacific Ocean; (2) fail to obey a lawful order of the Third Officer who was on the bridge and ordering [sic] him in the capacity of the Bridge Watch Officer to return to his lookout duty; (3) fail to obey the orders of the Master when told to accompany him to his office for logging at 2100 hours: (4) create a disturbance on the bridge of the TT BAY RIDGE by verbally confronting the Bosun while he was performing the duties of Helmsman on the 2000 to 2400 bridge watch;Appeal No. 2417Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19851/3/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2399 - LANCASTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's license upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V PAT BREEN, under authority of his license, Appellant did, on or about 5 March 1984, while down bound on the Ohio River at approximately mile 860 fail to safely navigate said vessel and its tow resulting in the tow grounding on the left descending bank of the river. The hearing was held at Evansville, Indiana on 24 April 1984. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge concluded that the Charge and specification had been proved and entered an order suspending Appellant's merchant mariner's license. The Decision and Order was served 28 February 1985. Appeal was timely filed and a copy of the transcript requested on 21 March 1985.Appeal No. 2399Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/31/19857/31/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2394 - ANTUNEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving aboard the SS LESLIE LYKES, under authority of his document, Appellant did, on or about 21 July 1983, while the ship was moored in Houston, Texas, wrongfully have in his possession marijuana. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas, on 27 July 1983. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge concluded that the charge and specification had been proved and entered an order revoking Appellant's merchant mariner's document. The Decision and Order was served 12 September 1983. Appeal was timely filed and a copy of the transcript requested on 25 August 1983.Appeal No. 2394Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/11/19857/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2383 - SWIEREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 August 1984 an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a dangerous drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the license and document above captioned, on or about 12 October 1979, Appellant was convicted by the U. S. District court for the Eastern District of Texas of Violating a dangerous drug law of the United States, to wit: marijuana possession. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 31 August 1984. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2383Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19852/22/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2407 - GONSALVESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 6 April 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Honolulu, Hawaii, suspended Appellant's license for six months plus an additional six months remitted on 12 months' probation, upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification originally alleged that Appellant while serving as Chief Engineer aboard the F/V OCEAN PEARL under authority of the captioned license did on or about 21 November 1983 while said vessel was at sea negligently allow oxygen and starting fluid (ether) to be used to start the vessel's main engine which resulted in an explosion which fatally burned the Master and seriously burned six other crewmembers. At sessions of the hearing convened in Honolulu, Hawaii, on 17 and 18 January 1984, Appellant was absent but was represented by professional counsel.Appeal No. 2407Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/17/19859/17/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2395 - LAMBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 November 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida suspended Appellant's license for six months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding prove a charge of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master on board the United State Army Dredge McFARLAND under authority of the license above captioned, on 1 May 1983, Appellant failed to ensure proper supervision of the removal of an electric hydraulic solenoid valve and failed to ensure that proper precautions were taken before allowing hotwork to be performed on the hydraulic system. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, florida, on 10 August 1983 and 23 September 1983. appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits and the testimony of six witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced his own testimony, that of another witness, and three exhibits.Appeal No. 2395Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/11/19857/11/198512/7/2017
Page 16 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.