CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2413 - KEYSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 December 1984, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as Able-bodied seaman aboard the SS SANTA ROSA, under the authority of the captioned document, on 8 July 1984: (1) failed to turn to for docking operations, and (2) had in his possession marijuana and valium. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on 21 November 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2413Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/18/198510/18/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2414 - HOLLOWELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 December 1984, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as Able-bodied seaman aboard the SS SANTA ROSA, under the authority of the captioned document, on 8 July 1984: (1) failed to turn to for docking operations, and (2) had in his possession marijuana and valium. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on 21 November 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2414Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/27/198511/27/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2415 - MARSHBURNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 13 February l984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for three months on six months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the Tug CHAUNCY [sic], under the authority of the captioned document, on 26 August 1983, while the vessel was navigating the Alligator River - Pungo River Canal, NC, Appellant maneuvered his flotilla - the towing vessel and two nonpropelled barges - resulting in an collision between the lead barge and the Fairfield Swing Bridge. The hearing was held at Wilmington, North Carolina, on 15 September 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2415Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/27/198511/27/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2416 - MOOREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CAR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 30 May 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V THERESA SELEY, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 1 September 1983, did fail to operate the vessel in safe and prudent manner in the area of miles 956-959, Ohio River, to wit, operating said vessel in the above river area when its draft exceeded the channel project depth, resulting in damage to and subsequent pollution from the vessel. The hearing was held at Paducah, Kentucky, on 1 November 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and supporting specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2416Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19861/3/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2418 - DOUGHERTYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 24 April 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for three months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Operator board the M/V JAMES E. NIVIN, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 8 February 1984, failed to operate his vessel so as to avoid alliding with the mooring cell on the Kentucky side of the Portland Canal in Louisville, Kentucky. The hearing was held at Louisville, Kentucky, on 25 April 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits.Appeal No. 2418Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/11/19862/11/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2419 - MURPHYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 17 May 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for two months outright plus an additional two months on eight months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant,while serving as Operator aboard the M/V JOE BOBZIEN, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 6 January 1985, navigated his tow in such a manner as to cause the tow to collide with the fleeted barges at Mile 808.5, Ohio River, left descending bank. The hearing was held at Evansville, Indiana, on 20 February 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2419Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/3/19863/3/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2420 - LENTZ.This appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 25 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license for twelve months outright plus an additional three months on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Operator aboard the M/V CAPT DARCE, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 25 August 1984, while the vessel was underway in San Pedro Bay with the barge SPARTAN 110 in tow, negligently failed to maintain a proper lookout. A second specification, alleging a failure to navigate the CAPT DARCE with due caution, thereby causing an allision between the barge SPARTAN 110 and the anchored P/C GOOD ID, was found not proved. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 22 October 1984, 20 November 1984 and 6 February 1985.Appeal No. 2420Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/18/19863/18/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2421 - RADERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 April 1985, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license for two months outright upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the TUG WESTERN COMET, under the authority of the captioned document, on 26 April 1984, Appellant failed to maintain a proper lookout, contributing to a collision with a pleasure vessel on the Willamette River at approximately river mile 3.5. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington, on 5 February 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence ten exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2421Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/25/19863/25/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2422 - GIBBONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 4 March 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's document for six months outright plus an additional six months' suspension on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The notice of hearing, charge and specifications set forth two charges of misconduct, each supported by one specification. At the outset of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge amended the charges by substituting in lieu thereof a single charge of misconduct supported by the two specifications. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as Boatswain aboard the M/V COVE SAILOR, under authority of the captioned document, (1) did on or about 27 January 1985, the said vessel being at sea, wrongfully assault and batter an Able Bodied Seaman by striking him in the throat and kicking him in the stomach, head and back, and (2) did on or about 25 January 1985, wrongfully assault the Chief Pumpman by making threatening remarks. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas, on 4 February 1985. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty on Appellant's behalf to the charge and each specification. The hearing was conducted in absentia.Appeal No. 2422Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/2/19866/2/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2423 - WESSELLSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 13 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license for one month on three months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Chief Engineer aboard USNS CONTENDER T-AGOS-2, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 22 September 1984, while said vessel was moored in Oakland, California, wrongfully fail to perform his duties due to intoxication. The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 9 October 1984 and 13 February 1985. On 9 October 1984, Appellant did not personally attend the hearing but he was represented by professional counsel. Counsel entered a plea of not guilty on Appellant's behalf to the charge and supporting specification. Appellant was present with counsel when the hearing reconvened on 13 February 1985.Appeal No. 2423Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19866/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2425 - BUTTNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 December 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Almadea, California, suspended Appellant's license for three months remitted on nine months' probation upon finding proved the charged of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot aboard the S.S. CORNUCOPIA, under the authority of the captioned document, on 1 June 1984, Appellant navigated the vessel in a negligent manner, resulting in an allision with and the dragging off-station of the San Francisco Bay, Blossom Rock Buoy (LLNR 592). The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 5 and 18 September 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2425Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19866/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2424 - CAVANAUGHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct and a charge of being a user of a dangerous drug. The specifications supporting these two charges allege that Appellant, while serving under authority of the captioned document on board the SS CONSTITUTION did, on or about 1900 24 February 1984 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully use cocaine and at the same time and place, being holder of the captioned document, was a user of and did use cocaine. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii, on 10, 23 and 24 March 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence two exhibits, his own testimony, and the testimony of four additional witnesses.Appeal No. 2424Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/6/19866/6/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2426 - FUTCHERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 24 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by four specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as Pilot/Mate on board the M/V CAPE MAY, on or about 31 July 1985 wrongfully fraternized with a 14-year-old female passenger, wrongfully engaged in undue familiarity with a 14-year-old female passenger, wrongfully engaged in sexual intercourse with a 14-year-old female passenger, and wrongfully failed to exclude a 14-year-old female passenger from the pilot hose and bridge of the vessel, as prohibited by 46 CFR 78.10-1. On 3 April 1986, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 7 April 1986. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the denial of a temporary document.Appellant urges that the administrative Law Judge erred in finding the specifications proved and in revoking Appellant's license and document. Appellant contends further that he should be issued a temporary license because he cannot be presumed to be a hazard to the navigation of any vessel.Appeal No. 2426Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/21/19867/21/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2430 - BARNHARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification supporting the charge alleges that Appellant, while serving as pumpman on board the SS LION OF CALIFORNIA, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 19 April 1985 at Berth 118, Los Angeles Harbor, wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics, to wit: marijuana. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 10 and 24 May 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2430Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/4/19868/4/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2429 - ROBERTSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot aboard the Greek flag M/V VERGO, under the authority of the captioned documents, on 4 September 1984, Appellant piloted the vessel on the Delaware River from Fairless Steel Works, Trenton, New Jersey, to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, an are beyond the scope of his license. Aa second charge, alleging negligence, was found not proved and was dismissed. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 28 March, 18 April, and 8 May 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2429Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/5/19868/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2428 - NEATThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 July 1958, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of "narcotics conviction." The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 12 June 1987, Appellant was convicted by the Twenty-fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana, a court of record, for knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: marijuana. A second charge, alleging misconduct, was found not proved. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 23 July 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits.Appeal No. 2428Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/7/19868/7/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2431 - HERNANDEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 28 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's document for one month outright plus an additional two months' suspension on ten months' probation upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and inattention to duty. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as person in charge aboard T/B NMS 1906, under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1655, 27 January 1985, (1) did fail to insure that the cargo tank butterworth covers were securely shut prior to cargo transfer resulting in an oil spill into the Calcasieu River (33 CFR 156.120(e)), and (2) did transfer oil from said barge without the required oil transfer procedures. The inattention to duty specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did fail to insure both of the required fire extinguishers were in serviceable condition prior to cargo oil transfer. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 19 February 1985. At the hearing, Appellant appeared without professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence two exhibits. The Administrative Law Judge rendered a written Decision and Order on 28 February 1985. He concluded that the charge and specifications of misconduct and the charge and specification of inattention to duty had been proved and suspended Appellant's document for one month outright plus an additional two months' suspension on ten months' probation.Appeal No. 2431Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/21/19868/21/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2432 - LEONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.SC. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 18 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by three specifications which alleged that appellant, while serving as A.B. on board the S.S. STONEWALL JACKSON, on or about 1 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by being asleep on watch; on or about 3 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by not timely relieving the watch; and on or about 19 February 1985 had in his possession marijuana. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 19 March, 2 April, 24 April, 15 May, and 21 May 1985. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified on his own behalf, and introduced in evidence one exhibit and the testimony of one additional witness.Appeal No. 2432Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/4/19869/4/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2433 - BARNABYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 3 February 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charges of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation" and "misconduct." The first specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 22 December 1978, Appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois for possession of cannabis, a dangerous drug with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: marijuana. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while making application to the U.S. Coast Guard Regional Examination Center, Toledo, Ohio for renewal of his license, misrepresented the particulars of his prior record by failing to reveal a prior conviction for possession of cannabis.Appeal No. 2433Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/22/19869/22/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2434 - CORVELEYNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 7 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license for six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of Violation of Regulation. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master aboard the S.S. AMERICAN SPITFIRE, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 17 December 1985, Appellant sailed from Midway Island in the Pacific Ocean with incompatible cargo stowage in hold no. 2. The specification further alleges that certain Class X-A explosives were incompatibly stowed with certain Class VII explosives, in that the two were separated by a structure made of wood boards that did not meet the minimum requirements for a partition bulkhead, in violation of 46 CFR 146.29-51(a) and (b), the chart accompanying 46 CFR 146.29-99 and 46 CFR 146.29-100, and the definition of a partition bulkhead at 46 CFR 146.29-11(c)(36). A second specification also alleging a violation of regulation was found not proved and was dismissed by the Administrative Law Judge.Appeal No. 2434Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/1/198610/1/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2435 - BABERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 22 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 12 August 1983, Appellant was convicted by the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida for possession of cocaine, in violation of F.S. 893.03(2)(a)(4) and F.S. 893.13(1)(e). The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 22 January 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits. Appellant introduced in evidence one exhibit and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2435Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198610/14/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2436 - STAFFNEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 1 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month, remitted on three months' probation, upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, between 22 and 27 January 1985, wrongfully operated the vessel ZENOVIA carrying passengers for hire while the vessel was documented exclusively for pleasure, in violation of 46 CFR 67.45-19. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, during the same time period, wrongfully operated the ZENOVIA carrying passengers for hire while liquified petroleum gas was used, in violation of 46 CFR 25.45-1(a), 46 CFR 147.03-11 and 46 CFR 147.05-100 Table S.Appeal No. 2436Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198610/14/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2438 - TURNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 19 July 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for six months upon finding proved the charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence specifications found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V GULF QUEEN, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 9 March 1985 fail to sound proper whistle signals, while said vessel was at anchor in an area of restricted visibility, at or near 28°55'N and 92°52'W in the Gulf of Mexico. The misconduct specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, on or about 8 March 1985, proceed on a voyage of greater than 12 hours, without the required number of licensed operators on board, at or near 28°55'N and 92°52'W in the Gulf of Mexico. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 15 April 1985. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications.Appeal No. 2438Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/24/198611/24/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2439 - FREDERICKSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 22 September 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V NATIVE SON, on or about 26 April 1986 negligently failed to keep clear while overtaking another vessel, and negligently crossed the bow of another vessel, thus endangering the life, limb and property of the passengers and crew aboard the two vessels. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while in preparation for a trip from St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands to Tortola, British Virgin Islands, on or about 10 May 1986, failed to give a safety orientation prior to getting underway or to have placards posted as required by 46 CFR 185.25-1(d), and while acting in the same capacity on the same date failed to have on board and available for inspection his license as required by 46 CFR 185.10-1.Appeal No. 2439Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198612/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2440 - LYONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 3 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for one year outright, plus an additional three months on eighteen months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Pilot on board the M/V FEDERAL CALUMET, on or about 25 November 1985, wrongfully directed the movement of the vessel while under the influence of an intoxicant. On 13 October 1986, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary license pending approval. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 22 October 1986.Appeal No. 2440Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/198612/10/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2441 - HESTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 September 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 15 December 1983, Appellant was convicted by the State of Mississippi, Circuit Court of Jackson County, of possession of marijuana. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 25 September 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel. The Administrative Law Judge entered on Appellant's behalf an answer of denial to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits.Appeal No. 2441Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/198612/10/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2442 - ALLBRITTENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 6 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month remitted on three months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE, under the authority of the captioned document, while the vessel was towing the barge GULF FLEET 263 and navigating in conditions of fog and restricted visibility on the St. Johns River, failed to navigate the vessel with caution causing the barge to strike the Buckman Bridge. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 2 August; 5, 13 and 20 September; and 2 October 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2442Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/16/198612/16/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2443 - BRUCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 28 April 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license outright for one month, plus an additional six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE, under the authority of the captioned document, failed to properly attain and/or use available weather information prior to proceeding to sea with the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE and the tow GULF FLEET 263, contributing to the failure of the towing connection and grounding of the barge GULF FLEET 263. A second specification under the charge of negligence, alleging a failure to properly examine towing gear, was found not proved and was dismissed. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 21 and 30 January 1986.Appeal No. 2443Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/5/19871/5/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2444 - RABATSKYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 11 July 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the united States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for three months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on or about June 26, 1985, Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V JOHN M. SELVICK, under the authority of the captioned document, operated the vessel and two on Lake Michigan during a period of darkness without ensuring that the tow was equipped with adequate navigational sidelights as required by Rules 22 and 24 of the Inland Navigational Rules. The hearing was held at Chicago, Illinois on 20 March 1986. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence ten exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2444Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/10/19872/10/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2445 - MATHISONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 16 January 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for two months, remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V BELCHER PENSACOLA, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 20 July 1984, after an underwater survey and the unauthorized repair of tank barge Belcher No. 35 at Key West, Florida, wrongfully failed to make known to officials designated to enforce inspection laws, at the earliest opportunity, a marine casualty producing serious injury to said tank barge in violation of 46 USC 3315. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida. on 13 March 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2445Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19873/6/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2446 - WATSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 11 July 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for four months outright plus an additional four months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on or about September 1, 1985, Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V ETTA KELCE, under the authority of the captioned document, failed to post a proper lookout, a violation of Rule 5 of the Inland Rules of the Road, at approximately Mile 44 on the Kanawha River, West Virginia. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri on 15 April 1986. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and denied the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2446Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/19/19873/19/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2447 - HODNETTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 16 January 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for two months, remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by two specifications. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V BELCHER PENSACOLA, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 18 July 1984, wrongfully failed to give notice as soon as possible to the nearest Coast Guard Marine Safety Office of the accidental grounding of tank barge Belcher No. 35, under tow of the BELCHER PENSACOLA, as required by 46 CFR 4.05-1. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while acting in the same capacity, on or about 19 July 1984, after an underwater survey and the unauthorized repair of tank barge Belcher No. 35 at Key West, Florida, wrongfully failed to make known to officials designated to enforce inspection laws, at the earliest opportunity, a marine casualty producing serious injury to said tank barge.Appeal No. 2447Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/10/19874/10/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2448 - POWERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 29 May 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month outright, plus and additional two months remitted on nine months' probation upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and negligence. The specification under the misconduct charge alleges that while serving as Docking Pilot aboard the M/V VERGO, under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1 September 1984, Appellant piloted the vessel in Newbold Channel, Delaware River, an area beyond the scope of his license. The specification under the negligence charge alleges that, while serving in the same capacity on the same date, Appellant caused the vessel to ground in the Delaware River. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 26 March and 16 April 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2448Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19876/8/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2449 - VANRIGHTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 June 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for six months outright, plus an additional six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported buy two specifications, both of which were found proved. The first specification alleged that on or about 17 January 1986, Appellant, while serving as second assistant engineer aboard the SS OVERSEAS ALASKA, under the authority of the captioned documents, while the vessel was at sea and Appellant was on watch, wrongfully failed to obey the direct order of the first assistant engineer in that Appellant failed to leave the engine room area and go to the operating platform. The second specification alleges that Appellant, on the same date and while serving in the same capacity, wrongfully assaulted the first assistant engineer with a hammer, and assaulted and battered the first assistant engineer with his fists, resulting in injury to the first assistant engineer.Appeal No. 2449Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19876/8/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2451 - PAULSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 21 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California revoked Appellant's document upon finding proved the charges of Misconduct and Use of Narcotics. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications. The first alleged that Appellant, while serving as Fireman/Watertender aboard SS Constitutional, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 22 February 1984 while the vessel was at sea enroute to Nawiliwili, Kauai, wrongfully use narcotics, to wit: Cocaine. The second misconduct specification alleged that while serving as in the same capacity at the same time and place Appellant wrongfully distributed cocaine to a member of the crew. The specification under the charge of Use of Narcotics alleged that Appellant, while serving as Fireman/Watertender aboard SS Constitution, being the holder of captioned document, was on or about 22 Feb 1984 while the vessel was en route to Nawiliwili, Kauai, a user of narcotics and did use certain narcotics, to wit: cocaine. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii, on 10, 22, 23, and 24 March 1984. The hearing in this case was consolidated with four other cases arising from incidents aboard the Constitution.Appeal No. 2451Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/11/19876/11/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2450 - FREDERICKSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 701. By order dated 22 September 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V NATIVE SON, on or about 26 April 1986 negligently failed to keep clear while overtaking another vessel, and negligently crossed the bow of another vessel, thus endangering the life, limb and property of the passengers and crew aboard the two vessels. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while in preparation for a trip from St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands to Tortola, British Virgin Islands, on or about 10 May 1986, failed to give a safety orientation prior to getting underway or to have placards posted as required by 46 CFR 185.25-1(d), and while acting in the same capacity on the same date failed to have on board and available for inspection his license as required by 46 CFR 185.10-1.Appeal No. 2450Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/11/19876/11/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2453 - WEDGEWORTHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order dated 3 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for four months remitted on twelve months probation upon finding proved a charge of negligence. The negligence charge was supported by a specification which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V TAMERA PICKETT, under authority of the captioned document, on or about 26 August 1985, failed to maintain adequate control of said vessel and tow resulting in an allision with the stationary DREDGE II at approximately Mile 283 on the Arkansas River. The hearing was held at Memphis, Tennessee, on 28 May 1986. Appellant was represented by professional counsel at the hearing, and denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence four exhibits, his own testimony,Appeal No. 2453Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/22/19876/22/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2452 - MORGANDEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 4 November 1986, as Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California suspended Appellant's document for a period of 18 months, plus an additional twelve months suspension on 24 months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge found proved was supported by six specifications. The first specification alleged that Appellant, while serving as Able Bodied Seaman aboard S/S Mason LYKES, under authority of the captioned document, did, on or about 1650, 6 June 1983 while the vessel was in Apra Harbor, Guam, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the Third Mate, in that he refused to go to the bow as directed. The second specification alleged that Appellant, while serving in the same capacity on or about 1230, 9 July 1983, while the vessel was at the Port of Oakland, California, wrongfully assaulted and battered the Chief Mate, by poking Appellant's finger into the Chief Mate's chest. The third specification alleged that Appellant, while serving in the same capacity, on or about 1230 9 July 1983, while the vessel was at the Port of Oakland, California, wrongfully assaulted and battered the Master by grabbing his arm. The fourth specification alleged that Appellant, while serving in the same capacity, on or about 9 July 1983, while the vessel was at the Port of Oakland, California, wrongfully interfered with the Master, in his official duty to protect a member of the crew, by refusing to obey the Master's order to leave the ship. The fifth specification alleged that Appellant, while serving as Able Bodied Seaman aboard S/S SANTA JUANA, under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1030, 17 August 1985 while the vessel was at sea, wrongfully assaulted and battered a member of the crew by striking him.Appeal No. 2452Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/24/19876/24/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2454 - LYONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order of 3 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document outright for one year, plus an additional three months remitted on eighteen months probation, upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved allege that Appellant did, under the authority of the captioned license, while serving as pilot aboard the M/V FEDERAL CALUMET, at or about 8:00 p.m. on 25 November 1985, wrongfully direct the movement of the vessel in St. Louis Bay, Superior, Wisconsin, while under the influence of an intoxicant. The hearing was held at Duluth, Minnesota, on 21 May 1986. Appellant was present at the hearing, and was represented by professional counsel. He denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses, and also introduced five exhibits.Appeal No. 2454Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/26/19876/26/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2455 - WARDELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part e, Subpart J. By order of 5 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license outright for three months upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, under the authority of the captioned license, while serving as pilot aboard the SS GREAT LAND, at or about 1:05 to 1:23 a.m. on 17 March 1985, during the vessel's approach on Cook Inlet and Knik Arm to Terminal 3. Port of Anchorage City Dock, wrongfully fail to properly navigate the vessel thereby causing an allision of the vessel with Terminal 3. Port of Anchorage City Dock. The hearing was held at Anchorage, Alaska, on 4,5,6, and 7 November 1985. Appellant was present at the hearing, and was represented by professional counsel. He denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of eight witnesses, and also introduced thirty-four exhibits.Appeal No. 2455Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/20/19877/20/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2456 - BURKEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR P art 5, Subpart J. By order of 7 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document outright for three months, plus six months remitted on probation for twelve months, upon fining proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, while acting under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 3 March 1986, at the Regional Examination Center, Boston, Massachusetts, wrongfully submit an application for a raise of grade, form CG-866, with invalid information on the sea service form, claiming ocean service onboard the SS LAKE CHARLES when the vessel was in a "lay-up " status. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 7 October 1986. Appellant was present at the hearing, and was represented by professional counsel. He denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of five witnesses, and also introduced three exhibits.Appeal No. 2456Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/23/19877/23/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2457 - YOUNGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order of 23 June 1986, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for four months, remitted on twelve months probation, upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MARJORIE B. MCALLISTER, on or about 15 November 1985, failed safely to navigate the M/V MARJORIE B. MCALLISTER, its tow, the T/B CIBRO SAVANNAH, and the assist tug M/V WALTON, within the Chelsea River, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, contributing to the allision of the T/B CIBRO SAVANNAH with the fending system of the Chelsea Street Bridge resulting in damage to the fending system. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as stated above, failed safely to navigate the M/V MAJORIE B. MCALLISTER, contributing to the allision of the T/B CIBRO SAVANNAH with the moored tug LEIGH ANN REINAUER. Three other specifications alleging negligence were found not proved. They alleged that Appellant failed safely to navigate the flotilla described, contributing to the allision with and damage to Chelsea River Lighted Buoy No. 2 by the tank barge and the assist tug, that Appellant failed safely to navigate the assist tug, and that Appellant failed safely to navigate the flotilla, contributing to theAppeal No. 2457Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/5/19878/5/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2472 - GARDNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. #7702 and 46 CFR #5.701. By order dated on 28 September 1987, an Administrarive Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended, on six months probation, Appellant's Merchant Mariner's License and Document for a period of one month upon finding proved a Charge of Misconduct, supported by one specification. The specification found proved under the Charge of Misconduct alleged that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard the ferry CONE JOHNSON, under the authority of the captioned license and document, did, at or about 2:49 PM local time on 21 June 1987. while overtaking a sailing vessel on Galveston Bay, a navigable waterway of the United States, fail to keep out of the way of the overtaken vessel as required by Rule 13 of the Inland Navigation Rules, to wit: the ferry CONE JOHNSON's passage did cause the operator of the sailing vessel to lose control of his vessel.Appeal No. 2472Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/6/19878/6/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2458 - GERMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 12 March 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Charleston, South Carolina, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by two specifications, both of which were found proved. The first specification alleged that at or about 1515 on December 6, 1986, while serving aborad the USNS SIRIUS, moored at the Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia, the Appellant, acting under the authority of the captioned document, wrongfully had in his possession a dangerous drug, namely marijuana. The second specification alleges that Appellant, at the same time and date and while serving in the same capacity, wrongfully had in his possession an alcoholic beverage, namely beer, in violation of a ship's standing order. The hearing was held at Charleston, South Carolina on 12 March 1987. At the hearing Appellant represented himself and answered admit to the first specification and no contest to the second specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and no witnesses were called to testify.Appeal No. 2458Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198710/14/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2459 - LORMANDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 13 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license and Merchant Mariner's Document upon finding proved the charge of conviction for narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned license and document, on or about 27 June 1983, Appellant was convicted by the 16th Judicial District Court of St. Martin's Parish, Louisiana for attempted possession of marijuana, barbiturates, and cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of the Revised Statutes of Louisiana. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 5 and 13 November 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and admitted that he had been convicted as set forth in the specification in issue.Appeal No. 2459Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/19/198710/19/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2460 - REEDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order of 24 November 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him incompetent to serve on board merchant vessels of the United States. the incompetence charge is supported by three specifications which allege that Appellant, while serving under the authority of his Merchant Mariner's document as an Able-bodied Seaman aboard the SS PRESIDENT FILLMORE, while the ship was at sea, did: (1) At or about 1300 hours, 8 June 1986, fail to obey an order, to wit: After specifically being told not to use water about any electrical equipment, he washed down the anchor windlass hydraulic unit and associated electrical equipment with salt water; (2) Between the hours of 0000 and 0400 on 19 March 1986, improperly disrupt engine room operations, to wit: he was observed to be talkingAppeal No. 2460Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/5/198711/5/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2437 - SMITHThis review has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart K. By order dated 25 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Respondent's license for three months on twelve months probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Respondent, while serving as Operator aboard the M/V STEEL CHALLENGER, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 15 January 1985, failed to maintain adequate control of his vessel and tow thereby allowing the tow to allide with the Greenville Highway Bridge at Mile 531.3, Lower Mississippi River. That order was appealed. On appeal, the Vice Commandant issued an order in which he set aside the finding of the Administrative Law Judge as to the charge of negligence, vacated the order suspending Respondent's license, and remanded the case to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings. Appeal Decision 2437 (SMITH). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge reopened the hearing. The reopened hearing was held at Memphis, Tennessee, on 3 March 1987.Appeal No. 2437Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/25/198711/25/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2461 - KITTRELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By order dated 22 January 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri admonished Appellant upon finding proved the charge of Violation of Regulation. The charge was initially supported by three specifications. However, the Administrative Law Judge found one specification involving 46 CRF SS35.35-1(c) not proved and dismissed this count. One specification found proved alleged that Appellant, serving as person-in-charge aboard Tank Barge T-7953, under the authority of his merchant mariner's document, on or about 25 April 1986, while transferring oil to Tank Barge T-7953 from Packer River Terminal at Mile 857.0, Upper Mississippi River, wrongfully absented himself from the barge in violation of 33 CFR 156.120(s). The remaining specification found proved alleged that Appellant, serving as person-in-charge aboard Tank Barge T-7953, under the authority of his merchant mariner's document, on or about 25 April 1986, while transferring oil to Tank Barge T-7953 from Packer River Terminal at Mile 857.0, Upper Mississippi River, wrongfully failed to provide a flame screen or proper supervision for the open No. One ullage hole in violation of 46 CFR 35.30-10.Appeal No. 2461Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/7/198712/7/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2478 - DUPREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By his order dated 30 September 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's Merchant Mariner's license and document for a period of one month upon finding proved the charges of negligence, misconduct, and violation of law. The specification supporting the charge of negligence alleged that Appellant, while serving under the authority of his above-captioned license and document, aboard the towing vessel ADMIRAL LEE, did, on 15 February 1987, tow the unmanned freight barge CMS-754 in an unsafe and hazardous manner, to wit: operating with a load in excess of the vessel's stability letter. The specification supporting the charge of misconduct alleged that Appellant, acting under the authority of his license and document aboard the ADMIRAL LEE, on 15 February 1987, failed to insure that the CMS-754 was loaded in compliance with the vessel's stability letter issued by the U.S. Coast Guard. The specification supporting the charge of violation of law alleged that Appellant, under the authority of his license and document, violated 46 U.S.C. SS2302, however, the Coast Guard withdrew this charge and its specification at the commencement of the hearing. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 5 August 1987. The Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered an answer of denial to the charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2478Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/4/19882/4/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2465 - O'CONNELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order of 11 February 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Tampa, Florida, suspended Appellant's license outright for four months, plus nine months remitted on twelve months probation, upon finding proved the charge of negligence. He also suspended Appellant's license outright for an additional two months for violating a previous order of suspension on probation. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, while serving as pilot aboard the M/V SEAFARER under the authority of the captioned license, on or about 19 August 1985, while the vessel was assisting the T/B OCEAN 255 inbound in Tampa Bay, fail to perform his duty to direct and control the vessel as required, in that he failed adequately or prudently to navigate the vessel resulting in the grounding of the tank barge OCEAN 255 in the vicinity of Buoy 11J, Tampa Bay, Florida.Appeal No. 2465Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/10/19885/10/198811/30/2017
Page 18 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.