CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2210 - HARRISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 February 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, on 10 January 1979, suspended the captioned documents for a period of one month on probation for a period of six months upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard BERING SEAL, under authority of the captioned documents, did, from on or about 1 December to 22 December 1978, wrongfully operate the vessel without the complement of crew required by the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, in that he did not have the required number of able seamen aboard. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and four documents. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of a witness and testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2210Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19805/20/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2211 - DUNCANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator on board the tug KATHRYNE E. MCALLISTER, under authority of the license above captioned, at or about 0100, 28 November 1978, Appellant failed to navigate said vessel and its tow, the tank barge CIBRO PHILADELPHIA, with due caution, resulting in the grounding of CIBRO PHILADELPHIA on Mill Rock, East River, N.Y., and the subsequent discharge of 942 barrels of #2 oil into the East River. The hearing was held at New York, New York, in four sessions during March and April, 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2211Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/22/19805/22/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2212 - LAWSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months outright, plus a further suspension for six months on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification alleged that while serving as Ordinary Seaman on board SS AMERICAN LIBERTY under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 29 March 1979, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter a member of the crew, Luis A. Lopez, Z-819 077. The lesser included offense of wrongfully engaging in mutual combat with a member of the crew was found proved. The hearing was held at New York, after a change of venue from Savannah, Georgia, on 4, 6, and 25 April 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2212Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19805/23/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2213 - RAINESThis appeal has ben taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 20 February 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after a hearing at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 12 February 1979, revoked Appellant's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as wiper aboard SS SAN ANTONIO, under authority of the captioned document, did, on 6 September 1977, while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully assault and batter with his fists a member of the crew, Harold C. Wolfe. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence two documents, including a copy of four pages of the official logbook of SS SAN ANTONIO. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence two certificates of discharge from vessels on which Appellant sailed subsequent to his discharge from SS SAN ANTONIO. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge entered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification as alleged had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation. The decision was served on 3 March 1979. Appeal was timely filed on 28 March 1979.Appeal No. 2213Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19805/23/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2214 - CHRISTENSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 March 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard after a hearing on 10 January 1978 at Portland, Maine, suspended Appellant's license for a period of one (1) month on probation for twelve (12) months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The first specification of negligence found proved alleged that while serving as operator aboard M/V BOBBIE under the authority of his license, Appellant did, on 14 December 1977 while said vessel was navigating Merchant Row, near Deer Island, Maine, in conditions of fog and restricted visibility, fail to obtain or properly use information available to determine the precise location of the vessel, causing the vessel to ground. The second specification of negligence found proved alleged that while serving as above Appellant failed to properly post a lookout, contributing to the vessel's grounding. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and two documents. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence his own testimony and one document.Appeal No. 2214Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2215 - RILEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 January 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, on 29 November 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of one month on probation for three months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard GULF FLEET NO. 22, under authority of the captioned documents, did, from 10 to 24 November 1978, fail to comply with the manning requirements as set forth in the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, to wit: sailing without a licensed engineer and one able seaman. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of one witness and four documents.Appeal No. 2215Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2216 - SORENSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 April 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as pilot on board the SS CHANCELLORSVILLE under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 9 December 1978, Appellant failed to navigate with caution in the vicinity of Courthouse Point, Maryland, thereby resulting in said vessel running around. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 24, 25 January, and 8, 14 and 15 February 1979. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2216Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2217 - QUINNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for 6 months on 12 month's probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specification of negligence found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the M/V PANTHER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 25 April 1979, Appellant did, while said vessel was navigating on the Intercoastal Waterway at Hillsboro Inlet, Florida, fail to safely navigate said vessel in such a manner as to preclude the barges she was pushing from colliding with the Helen S. Marina, the F/V HELEN S, and various other vessels moored at the Helen S. Marina. The specification of misconduct found proved alleges that while serving as operator of the M/V PANTHER, Appellant did, on or about 24 April 1979 wrongfully operate the M/V PANTHER as master of said vessel without having endorsed the vessel's Certificate of Registry as required by 46 U.S.C. 40. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 10 and 11 July 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and each specification.Appeal No. 2217Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2218 - LASKIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 April 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Master on board SS TRANSINDIANA under authority of the license above captioned, on 11 October 1978, Appellant wrongfully failed to navigate with due caution as the burdened vessel by failing to keep out of the way of SS ROBERT E. LEE in a crossing situation, in violation of Rules 15 and 16 of the International Rules of the Road. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 6 February 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2218Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19806/4/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2220 - LAMBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, after a hearing at Baltimore, Maryland, on 8, 24, and 25 May 1979, ordered Appellant admonished upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard tug NANTICOKE, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on 15 February 1979, while said vessel was under his command, knowingly transit the Nanticoke River with the barge DEBORAH from Seaford, Delaware, to Nanticoke River Buoy No. 4 (LLP 410), in violation of U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port of Baltimore order NR 05-79, during the hours of darkness, and without sufficient horsepower. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2220Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19806/12/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2221 - CERCYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 September 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator on board Motor Vessel TIGER STAR under authority of the license above captioned, on 4 August 1978, Appellant negligently fell asleep at the wheel, thereby contributing to a collision between TIGER STAR and a fixed platform. A second charge of misconduct was withdrawn at the outset of the proceeding. The hearing was held at New Orleans on 15, 22 and 29 August, and 8 September 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty of the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2221Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19806/12/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2219 - BUFORDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Galveston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months, plus three months on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Cook on board SS MERRIMAC under authority of the seaman's document above captioned, on or about 30 April 1978, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a member of the crew by throwing hot soup upon him, causing the crewmember to suffer an injury. The hearing was held at Galveston, Texas, on 2 June 1978. The hearing was held in absentia when the Appellant did not show up at the time and place of the hearing. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the following pieces of documentary evidence: (a) Affidavit of Service and Recitation of Rights, (b) Certification of Shipping Articles, (c) certified photocopy of page 39 of the Official Log of the SS MERRIMAC of April 30, 1978, (d) signed statement of Ricky Carter, (e) signed statement of Clinton Cleveland, (f) signed statement of Juan Oguendo, and (g) signed statement of Bert Winfield. The Investigating Officer did not introduce any live witnesses.Appeal No. 2219Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/16/19806/16/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2222 - FIOCCAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 October 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The six specifications of misconduct found proved allege that while serving as Boatswain on board SS MORMACWAVE under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) on or about 11 January 1979, failed to perform his duties; (2) on 12 January 1979, failed to perform his regularly assigned duties by being absent from the vessel from 0800 to 1200 and from 1300 to 1700 without sufficient cause; (3) on 22 January 1979, failed to perform his duties in that he was absent from the vessel 0830 to 1200 and from 1300 to 1700 without proper permission; (4) on 23 January 1979, failed to perform his regularly assigned duties from 0800 to 1200 and from 1300 to 1700 without proper permission; (5) on 24 January 1979, failed to obey a lawful order in that when asked by the Master if he would obey orders, he indicated to the master that he would not obey orders; and (6) on 24 January 1979, failed to obey a lawful order of the Chief Mate in that when ordered to appear before the Master to have a log entry read to him, he refused and sent the Chief Mate a note which said, "Drop Dead. the X Bosin."Appeal No. 2222Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/21/19807/21/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2223 - HEWITTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 4 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, suspended Appellant's documents for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while acting under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 May 1979, Appellant wrongfully and fraudulently executed a false application for a raise in grade of his licensed to Master by certifying that he had not made application for a license and been rejected within twelve months. A second specification concerning an unfair practice allegedly occurring on 26 April 1979 in New York was dismissed. The hearing was held at Baltimore on 12 June 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence three documents.Appeal No. 2223Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2224 - HUGHESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1 By order dated 14 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's documents outright for three months, plus three additional months for violation of probation imposed in a prior proceeding, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Pilot on board the M/V CHIGUSA MARU under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 6 July 1979, while said vessel was enroute from San Francisco Bay to Pittsburgh, California, Appellant: (1) failed to maintain control of said vessel, resulting in its grounding; and (2) failed to maintain control of said vessel, resulting in a collision with and destruction of an established U.S. aid to navigation. The hearing was held at San Francisco on 27 September and 3, 4, 5, and 31 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2224Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2225 - LAWRENCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 March 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida , after a hearing at Cleveland, Ohio, on 14 February 1979, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard M/V SAM LAUD, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on or about 14 January 1979, while said vessel was in the port of Cleveland, Ohio, wrongfully fail to give notice of a marine casualty involving his vessel to the nearest Marine Inspection Office of the Coast Guard, to wit, Marine Safety Office, Cleveland, Ohio. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The investigation Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2225Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2226 - DAVISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the SS DELTA NORTE under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 6 August 1979, Appellant wilfully disobeyed a lawful order given him by the Chief Mate; to wit, he failed to complete stripping the vessel's logbook before going ashore. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 3 October 1979, 7 November 1979, and 6 December 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of the Chief Mate of the SS DELTA NORTE and two pieces of documentary evidence: (a) certified extract from Shipping Articles of SS DELTA NORTE (10 ex 2), (b) a copy of logbook entry of SS DELTA NORTE (10 ex 4). In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and a letter from Baker-Lyman Co., Inc. dated 15 October 1979.Appeal No. 2226Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/29/19807/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2227 - MANDLYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United Stated Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for 3 months on 12 months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Chief Officer on board the SS AUSTRAL ENDURANCE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 June 1978, Appellant failed to properly supervise maintenance work being performed on the starboard lifeboat gear and that this failure to supervise led to an injury being suffered by Cadet Edward Coll. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 15 June and 16, 23 and 24 July 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2227Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/30/19807/30/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2228 - DAVISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after a hearing at Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 May and 2 August 1979, revoked the captioned document upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as able seaman aboard SS OVERSEAS ULLA, under authority of the above captioned document, did, on or about 15 May 1979, while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully assault and batter by beating with his fists a member of the crew, Lennie C. Jones; and (2) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did on or about 15 May 1979, wrongfully assault with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a pair of pliers, a member of the crew, Lennie C. Jones. Appellant did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, which was held in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence four documents and one deposition. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge entered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and both specifications as alleged had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation.Appeal No. 2228Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/13/19808/13/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2229 - KELLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 November 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for six months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved allege that while serving as master on board the United States M/V VINCENT TIBBETTS, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 August 1977, Appellant: (1) failed properly to navigate the vessel between Long Island and Portland Harbor, Maine, with a resultant grounding of the vessel on Cow Island; (2) did "fail to notify U.S. Coast Guard Personnel about the grounding on Cow Island on or about 10 August 1977", and (3) failed to maintain a proper-lookout. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine, on 17 August 1977.Appeal No. 2229Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/18/19808/18/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2230 - SOLLINEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Bach, California, suspended Appellant's documents for two months, on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that, while serving as First Assistant Engineer on board the SS KEYSTONE CANYOU under authority of the captioned documents on or about 23 August 1979, Appellant wrongfully engaged in mutual combat with crewmember Clarence Crocker by strikining him with his fists and shoving him, while the vessel was at sea. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 30 August and 13 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence three exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of five witnesses, including his own testimony.Appeal No. 2230Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/18/19808/18/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2231 - AUSTINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Day Maintenanceman aboard SS EXPORT BANNER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 August 1976, while said vessel was in the port of Brooklyn, New York, Appellant wrongfully had in his possession certain narcotics, to wit, marijuana and opium. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 24 July 1979, and in Boston on 14 August and 27-28 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigation Officer introduced in evidence nine documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and the testimony of seven other witnesses. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to him.Appeal No. 2231Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/16/19809/16/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2232 - MILLERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 November 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license outright for a period of six (6) months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The one specification of negligence found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Chief Engineer aboard SS LURLINE, under authority of his license, on or about 22 December 1977, failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the overfilling of fuel oil tanks and subsequent spilling of a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2232Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2233 - WALSHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 20 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Tankerman on board MORANIA 140 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 October 1979, Appellant, as person in charge of cargo loading, negligently allowed a cargo tank to overflow, spilling fuel oil on the deck of the barge and into Arthur Kill, a navigable water of the United States, by not monitoring the level in the tank after it had been secured. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 29 November 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documents, one of which comprised the stipulated testimony of an eyewitness to the event in question.Appeal No. 2233Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2234 - REIMANNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 7 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for two months, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board SS AVILA under authority of the license above captioned, at or about 0830, 19 June 1979, Appellant negligently failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the overfilling of Number 3 starboard tank and subsequent spilling of a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. The hearing was held at Embarcadero Center, Suite 310, San Francisco, California, on 27 July, 16 August, 20 August, 5 September, and 14 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and, in Appellant's absence from the first session, a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf.Appeal No. 2234Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2235 - RABRENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 November 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Pilot on board SS GULF TIGER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 August 1978, Appellant did, while inbound in Tampa Bay, Florida, wrongfully ground said vessel. A second specification, found not proved, alleged that while serving in the above capacity Appellant negligently piloted said vessel at excessive speed, thereby contributing to the grounding. The hearing was held at Tampa, Florida, on 22 November 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2235Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2236 - CLUFFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, suspended Appellant's United States Coast Guard First Class Pilot's License No. 457718 for 3 months on 12 month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot on board M/V MOSEL under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 2 March 1979, while the said vessel in the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, Appellant failed to navigate the vessel with due caution, thereby causing an allision between the raised heavy lift boom of the vessel and the Reedy Point Bridge. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 22 May 1979 and adjourned to 7 September 1979, on which date it was concluded. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2236Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/23/19812/23/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2237 - STRELICThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license number 388 977 and all other valid Coast Guard licenses issued to Appellant for three (3) months on twelve (12) month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board SS AMOCO CONNECTICUT, under authority of the license and document above captioned, on or about 20 December 1978, Appellant negligently failed to ensure that the vessel's position was fixed and plotted on a chart of the area, Narragansett Bay, which is a part of the navigable waters of the United States. The hearings were held at Providence, Rhode Island, on 16 January, 13 March, 22 May and 10 July 1979. At the hearings, Appellant was represented by counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence an Affidavit of Service of the Charge Sheet; Charts of Narragansett Bay (No. 13223), Martha's Vineyard (No. 13218), and Providence River (No. 13224); the testimony of LT William J. Morani; the deposition of Francis J. Smith, Second Mate; and log entries of the AMOCO CONNECTICUT for 19 and 20 December 1978.Appeal No. 2237Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/26/19812/26/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2238 - MONTGOMERYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and Title 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 March 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Electrician on board SS MORMACARGO under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 29 October 1979, Appellant had in his possession a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 20 December 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and four documents.Appeal No. 2238Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/4/19813/4/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2239 - VINCENTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g), and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 August 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months, plus six months on twelve month's probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Fireman/Watertender on board SS AFRICAN DAWN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 8 May 1978, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter with his hand the Third Assistant Engineer. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 22, 23 and 27 June 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of the Third Assistant Engineer and two pieces of documentary evidence: a certified abstract of line 31 of the shipping articles for SS AFRICAN DAWN, and a certified copy of pages 21 and 22 of the vessel's official logbook.Appeal No. 2239Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/23/19813/23/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2240 - PALMERThis review has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 April 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Able Seaman on board S.S. THOMAS JEFFERSON under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 21 February 1980, Appellant did, while the vessel was in the port of Rotterdam, wrongfully assault and batter with a bottle a shipmate, Erick H. Sorensen, AB, Z-[REDACTED]-DI. The hearing was held at San Francisco on 21 April 1980. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered in his behalf in accordance with 46 CFR 5.20-75, and the hearing proceeded in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2240Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/1/19814/1/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2241 - NIEDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 20 December 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, after a hearing at Long Beach, California, on 29 November 1978, suspended Appellant's documents for a period of three months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The single specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as pilot aboard M/T LION OF CALIFORNIA, under authority of his captioned documents, did on or about 19 September 1978, at 1759, navigate the vessel in a negligent manner so as to cause an allision between the vessel and M/V GLOMAR EXPLORER in Slip 240, Los Angeles Harbor. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer offered into evidence, without objection from Appellant, numerous copies of documents. It was stipulated between the parties that Appellant was serving as Pilot on board the LION OF CALIFORNIA at all times material and pertinent to the issue at hand, and that he had given all engine and rudder commands. The Investigating Officer introduced no further evidence.Appeal No. 2241Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/2/19814/2/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2242 - JACKSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 August 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellants' seaman's documents upon finding them guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved in each case alleges that while serving on board SS DELTA PARAGUAY under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 7 July 1978, Appellants, at or about the steering engine room on board DELTA PARAGUAY did wrongfully have in their possession certain narcotics, to wit, marijuana. The hearing was held in joinder at Houston, Texas, on 20 and 31 July 1978. At the hearing, Appellants elected to act as their own counsel and entered pleas of not guilty to the charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2242Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/2/19814/2/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2243 - TRIGGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of the charge of "inattention to duty." The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Assistant Engineer on board SS AMERICAN ARGOSY under authority of the document and license above described, on or about 24 May 1979, while the vessel was in Baltimore, Appellant negligently failed to adequately conduct oil transfer between No. 7 starboard fuel oil tank and No. 2 starboard settling tank, causing overflow of the settling tank into Baltimore Harbor and pollution of navigable waters of the United States (about 2 barrels). The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 20 June, 20 July, 16 August and 20 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer's evidence consisted of the testimony of one witness, the engine log, and documents concerning tank loading. In defense, Appellant offered his own testimony. Appellant also offered one document which was not admitted.Appeal No. 2243Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/2/19814/2/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2244 - JAHNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Pilot on board SS CORNUCOPIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 December 1979, while said vessel was enroute from San Francisco to Stockton, Appellant failed to properly maintain control of said vessel, resulting in CORNUCOPIA's colliding with and damaging Beacon #11 (LLNR891) an established U.S. aid to navigation; and that while serving as aforesaid, did fail to properly maintain control of said vessel resulting in its grounding. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 6 and 28 February and 7 and 14 March 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2244Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/28/19814/28/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2245 - ROBINSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 February 1980, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after hearings at New York, New York, on 29 November and 18 December 1978, and on 24 January, 14 February, 14 March, 9 May, 4 and 27 June, 9 and 16 July, 17 August, 19 September, and 7, 19 and 26 November 1979, revoked the captioned document upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct proved, alleges that Appellant, while serving as Fireman/Watertender aboard USNS ANDREW MILLER, under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document, did, at or about 2400, 12 March 1975, at Yokosuka, Japan, while said was in the port of Yokosuka, Japan, wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics to wit, heroin. Appellant appeared and was represented by counsel. No formal arraignment was held and no plea appears on the record of any of the hearings. It is clear that the proceedings were conducted as if a "not guilty" plea had been entered. Appellant was fully advised of the charges and specifications against him and of his rights. As in Decision on Appeal No. 867, there was no prejudice to Appellant because the hearing was conducted as though a plea of "not guilty" had been entered.Appeal No. 2245Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/29/19814/29/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2246 - CONWAYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 March 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Tankerman on board the TANK BARGE E 21, under authority of the document above captioned, at or about 20 July 1979, while the barge was moored in Perth Amboy, New Jersey, Appellant wrongfully caused the opening of the manifold valve before the hose connections were complete, thus permitting a harmful quantity of oil to spill into the Raritan River, a navigable water of the United States. The hearing was held at New York at various time from 16 August 1979, to 14 March of 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence three written statements, two documents, his own testimony, and that of a witness.Appeal No. 2246Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19816/3/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2247 - LUKOWSKIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 24 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Ship's Utilityman on board the United States SS B.T. SAN DIEGO under authority of the document above captioned, on or above 4 April 1979, while the vessel was moored in Port Angeles, Washington, Appellant assaulted Boatswain Theodore Levy. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 3 and 29 August and 24 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2247Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19816/3/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2248 - FREEMANThis review has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 19 June 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator/person-in-charge on board M/V IKE D and tow, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 January 1980, Appellant, while navigating the Mississippi River near New Orleans, La., above the Huey P. Long Bridge, in darkness between the hours of sunset and sunrise, wrongfully failed to show the required navigation lights on his towing vessel and the barge in tow. The hearing was held at New Orleans, La., on 21 February, 11 and 25 March, 1 and 29 April, 8 May, 16 June, and 2 July 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2248Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19816/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2249 - DURANDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 November 1979, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for three months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The amended specification found proved alleged that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V PILOT, O.N. 580326, under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 22 September 1977, Appellant operated said vessel in the Southwest lane, in contravention of the Strait of Dover Traffic Separation Scheme promulgated under authority of IMCO Resolution A. 284 (VIII), 20 November 1973. A second amended specification, that Appellant did ship and discharge seaman without filing a report as required by 46 U.S.C. 643(1), was found not proved. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 23 April, 23 July, 28 September, and 4 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence thirteen documentary exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2249Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19816/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2250 - HADWARIThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 April 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after a hearing on several dates between 21 March and 6 April 1978, suspended. Appellant's document for a period of three months on probation of twelve months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as ordinary seaman aboard SS AMERICAN AQUARIUS, under authority of the captioned document, did, on or about 22 January 1978, while said vessel was in the foreign port of Yokohoma, Japan, wrongfully fails to obey a lawful order of the Third Officer, to wit, go below; (2) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did, on or about 22 January 1978, while said vessel was leaving the foreign port of Yokohoma, Japan, wrongfully direct obscene and abusive language at the Chief Officer. At the hearings Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2250Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19816/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2251 - FADLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The one specification found proved alleges that while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 5 August 1970, Appellant was convicted by the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of New York, a court of record, for violation of Section 220.05 of the Penal Law of the State of New York, for criminal possession of a dangerous drug, to wit; Hashish. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 25 July 1980. Appellant did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, which was held in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documents.Appeal No. 2251Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2252 - BOYCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 October 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Able Bodied Seaman on board SS AMERICAN CHARGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 16 October 1978, Appellant, while said vessel was in the port of San Diego, California, wrongfully had in his possession narcotics. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 3 January and continued through 9 August 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness, a deposition, and three documentary exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered no evidence, but did submit a Memorandum of Law. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 15 October 1979. Appeal was timely filed on 9 November 1979 and perfected on 7 February 1980.Appeal No. 2252Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2253 - KIELYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 April 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve month's probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Mate on board SS WORTH under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 2 June 1978, at Texaco Eagle Point Westville, New Jersey, on the Delaware River, Appellant failed to adequately supervise a ballast loading operation on his vessel, causing pollution of the navigable waters of the United States. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 15 October and 7 December 1979, 17 and 29 January 1980, and 30 April 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to each charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence statements of the Second Mate, Mr. William T. Smith; an affidavit of service on Appellant of 5 October 1979 by the Investigating Officer; and a Master's Report of Seaman Shipped or Discharged (CG-735(T)) dated 17 October 1979 for SS WORTH.Appeal No. 2253Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2256 - MONTANEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.25-15. By order dated 25 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The three specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Ordinary Seaman on board SS BANNER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 10, 13 and 14 November 1979, Appellant failed to perform his duties as bow lookout. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts, on 29 November 1979 and 15 January 1980. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification on Appellant's behalf, and the hearing proceeded in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and four exhibits. No evidence was offered in defense.Appeal No. 2256Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2257 - MALANAPHYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on eight months' probation, upon finding him guilty of the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Mate on board the M/V WALLA WALLA, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 May 1980, Appellant failed to respond promptly to a passenger's timely summons for help, thereby being unavailable to avert an assault which subsequently occurred, resulting in injury to a crew member. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington, on 30 June and 1 July 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and nine documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of three person, including his own, and one document.Appeal No. 2257Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2258 - HOPKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Second Mate on board SS MONTPELIER VICTORY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 January 1979, Appellant: -negligently navigated the said vessel by failing to ascertain the said vessel's position between approximately 1600 and 1650; -did negligently plot upon the chart the 1610 fix incorrectly; -did negligently alter the vessel's course from 287° gyro to 300° without first properly fixing the vessel's position, contributing to the grounding of the said vessel; and -did negligently turn over the deck watch to the Third Officer, Walter S. BENECKY, without properly advising him of the vessel's position, thereby contributing to the grounding of the said vessel. The Administrative Law Judge found that the latter two specifications were proved as matters in aggravation with respect to the first two specifications found proved, and not as independent offenses.Appeal No. 2258Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2259 - ROGERSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 December 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for one month on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator on board M/V CITY OF PITTSBURGH under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 1 October 1980, Appellant failed to maintain a proper watch on river conditions, which contributed to the grounding of tank barge AO-98 due to falling river conditions. The hearing was held at Louisville, Kentucky, on 19 November 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and seven documents.Appeal No. 2259Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/29/19817/19/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2254 - YOUNGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 6 March 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as fireman-watertender on board SS AFRICAN NEPTUNE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 October 1977, Appellant had in his possession 1909.2 grams of marijuana, a controlled substance. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on December 13, 1978 and continued through February 7, 1979. At the initial hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The counsel representing Appellant at the hearing before the Administrative Law Judge failed to appear on several occasions, despite agreed dates. On 8 January 1979, the hearing proceeded without the presence of Appellant's counsel. At a subsequent session counsel did appear, and was afforded the opportunity of recalling the principal witness presented by the Investigating Officer. Appellant is now represented by substitute counsel.Appeal No. 2254Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/22/19817/22/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2260 - BOGGANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Mobile, Alabama, suspended Appellant's documents outright for two months, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as First Assistant Engineer on board SS INTREPID under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 11 September 1979, Appellant wrongfully deserted the vessel at a foreign port, to wit: Guam, Mariana Islands. The hearing was held at Mobile, Alabama, on 16 November 1979. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2260Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/30/19817/30/198112/21/2017
Page 14 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.