CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2128 - HOLLINGSWORTHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order rendered on 15 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a third pantryman on board the SS President Fillmore under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 May 1977, appellant did "wrongfully create a disturbance aboard said vessel by yelling and addressing foul and abusive language to a fellow crewmember, J. B. ALLEN." At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and no exhibits. At the end of the hearing, the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order of admonition on Appellant.Appeal No. 2128Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/27/19787/27/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2129 - RENFROThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months outright plus four months on eight months's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as operator of the towboat MISS SYLVIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 July 1976, Appellant: (1) failed to keep out of the way in a crossing situation of the downbound vessel SEA HARMONY at New Orleans in the Mississippi River; (2) negligently entered the Mississippi River with his tow without regard to "existing traffic," "causing a collision between the tow and SEA HARMONY;" and (3) negligently cause a medium "oil pollution spill" and damage to SEA HARMONY At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2129Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/27/19787/27/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2130 - BARTLOWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code Federal Regulation 5.30-1. By order dated 28 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, North Carolina, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a steward utility on board SS AMERICAN RANGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 June 1977, Appellant wrongfully used abusive and profane language toward the vessel's First Assistant Engineer, Joseph Czarnecki. A second specification that Appellant wrongfully assaulted the First Assistant Engineer by brandishing his fist in a threatening manner and offering to inflict bodily harm was found not proved. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence relevant extracts of the ship's log, and the testimony of Joseph Czarnecki and Lawrence J. Grembocki.Appeal No. 2130Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/28/19787/28/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2131 - NUNEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 August 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while acting under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant altered the license by changing the date of issue from 22 February 1972 to 22 February 22 1973. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and documents relative to the issuance of license no. 103934. In defense, Appellant offered an unsworn statement. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 22 August 1977. Appeal was timely filed.Appeal No. 2131Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/4/19788/4/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2132 - KEENANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 January 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct in a hearing held at Corpus Cristi, Texas, on 21 December 1970. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS OVERSEAS PROGRESS under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 18 December 1970, Appellant wrongfully engaged in acts of sexual perversion with two other (named) members of the crew of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and pleaded guilty to the charge and specification. The Administrative Law Judge warned Appellant of the seriousness of the misconduct charged but Appellant, with concurrence of counsel, persisted in the plea. The Investigating Officer made a statement as to the facts as to which evidence was available and Appellant, through counsel, pleaded for leniency on the grounds that he was intoxicated at the time of the occurrences.Appeal No. 2132Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/13/19789/13/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2133 - SANDLINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master of SS LASH ITALIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 March 1976, Appellant neglected and failed to navigate the vessel with due caution which resulted in grounding of said vessel in Fort Sumter Channel, Charleston, South Carolina. A specification of "Misconduct," alleging that Appellant had wrongfully failed to give notice of that grounding in timely fashion was dismissed as not proved. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2133Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/25/19789/25/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2134 - JOHNSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master on board the United States SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 March 1977, Appellant failed to post a proper watch to attend the stern towing line leading from SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON to the tug TONY ST. PHILLIP. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending Appellant's license for a period of three months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 2134Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2136 - DILLONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 2 September, 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master of SS COVE COMMUNICATOR under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 1 May 1977, Appellant "wrongfully departed a port of the United States, to wit: New Orleans, Louisiana, to sea with less than 65 per centrum of the deck crew, exclusive of licensed officers, of said vessel holding a rating of able seaman." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and several pertinent voyage records of COVE COMMUNICATOR. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of two months on six months' probation.Appeal No. 2136Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2137 - DESVAUXThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR. 5.30-1. By order dated 8 August 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New, York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for eight months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, after finding her guilty of a charge of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Messman on board SS AUSTRAL ENVOY under of the document above captioned, Appellant did: (1) on or about 11 January 1977 at approximately 0800 while the vessel was at sea wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Steward, William Yang, by spitting in his face; (2) on or about 21 March 1977 at approximately 0945 while the vessel was at the Port Newark, N.J. wrongfully assault and batter the Master, Hector Bravo, by striking him in the face with her hand; (3) on 21 March 1977, at approximately 1250, while the vessel was at Port Newark, N.J., wrongfully assault and batter the Master, Hector Bravo, by striking him in the face with her hands and by kicking him with her feet. Appellant appeared pro se at the hearing and, after an explanation (by the Administrative Law Judge) of her right to counsel and the possible consequences of her plea, waived her right to counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to each of the three specifications.Appeal No. 2137Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2138 - HARDSAWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 13 October 1977, as amended 17 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as OPERATOR on board the TUG COLUMBIA, O/N 516116 under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 15 September 1977, Appellant did negligently fail to correctly ascertain the height of his tow prior to attempting to pass under the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and as a result of that negligence collided with the Bridge causing damage to the Bridge and the tow. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the unsworn statements of the Appellant and one witness, and three items of documentary evidence.Appeal No. 2138Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/8/197811/8/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2139 - DANCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month on three months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board the United States tank barge BAYOU TECHE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 12 May 1977, Appellant did "transfer asphalt in said barge while not having sufficient capacity with the deck discharge containment." At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses. Appellant testified in his own behalf. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge reserved decision. He later concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of one month on three months' probation.Appeal No. 2139Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2140 - FOMICHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January, 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for ten months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS EAGLE VOYAGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 July 1976, Appellant assaulted another crewmember with a dangerous weapon; on 19 and 20 July 1976, failed to perform duties aboard the vessel; on 24 July 1976 failed to join the vessel at Iljichevsk, U.S.S.R. At the hearing, Appellant failed to appear, and a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification was entered by the Administrative Law Judge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of EAGLE VOYAGER, the testimony of one Abdulla A. Mohsin, and a deposition of one David H. Regester, Jr., taken pursuant to order. There was no defense.Appeal No. 2140Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2141 - WADDYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 239b, and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.20-1. By order dated 31 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct and of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specifications of misconduct found proved allege that while serving as a pantryman on board the United States SS PRESIDENT MONROE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 15 July 1977, Appellant assaulted and battered with his fists one Keichi Kakuda, a waiter aboard the vessel, and on 20 July 1978, disobeyed a lawful order of the chief steward by entering a passenger area of the vessel outside working hours. The specification under 46 U.S.C. 239b alleged that Appellant had been, on 9 July 1974, convicted in the Municipal Court of Los Angeles County, California, of violation of section 11357 of the Health and Safety Code, involving possession of marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to each charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2141Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2142 - MALCOLMThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after hearing held on 22 July 1977 at Detroit, Michigan, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board HANNAH 2902 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 18 July 1977, Appellant did, "while said barge was transferring Bunker C at Mistersky Power Plant, Detroit, Michigan, wrongfully absent himself from said barge while transferring." At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents and the testimony of three witnesses. There was no defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months plus three months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 2142Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2143 - FOSTERThese appeals have been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By orders dated 3 January 1978 (CAMERON) and 6 January 1978 (FOSTER), an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Savannah, Georgia, suspended Appellant CAMERON's and Appellant FOSTER's seaman's documents, respectively, for three months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding each guilty of misconduct. The four specifications found proved allege that CAMERON, while serving as radio Officer, and FOSTER, while serving as Chief Steward, onboard SS EXPORT CHAMPION under the authority of the respective documents above-captioned, did: (First) "on or about 1000, 15 October 1977, while said vessel was anchored at Balboa, Panama Canal Zone, awaiting canal transit, absent himself from said vessel proper authorization;" (Second) "on or about 1454, 15 October 1977, when said vessel departed anchorage area to transit the canal, failed to join said vessel upon its departure;" (Third) "on or about 0900, 20 October 1977, while said vessel was moored at Garden city, Georgia, did use abusive language towards and Investigating Officer, a United States Coast Guard Officer, CWO-4 William C HENDRY and did wrongfully impede him in the performance of his official duties;" and (Fourth) "on or about 1100, 21 October 1977, did use abusive language towards a United States Shipping commissioner and wrongfully impeded a United States coast Guard Officer, Ensign Bruce P. MORELLI in the performance of his official duties."Appeal No. 2143Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/24/197811/24/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2144 - WILHELMYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 15 November 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's License for a period of one month, on probation for one year, after finding him guilty of a charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Master aboard the United States M/V SAM LAUD, Appellant did, on 4 July 1976, fail to accurately ascertain the vessel's position with due care while approaching Buffalo South Entrance Channel, Lake Erie, resulting in the grounding of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The matter came on for hearing on 12 April 1977. The Investigating Officer presented as evidence the testimony of Wilfred J. Short, a mate on watch aboard M/V SAN LAUD at the time of the incident, as well as documentary evidence. After theAppeal No. 2144Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/1/19781/1/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2145 - WALKERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 December 1976, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months plus three months on three months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an AB seaman on board the United States SS SAM HOUSTON under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) on 5 September 1976 wrongfully had intoxicants in his possession aboard the vessel at sea, and failed to perform duties, (2) on 6 September 1976, wrongfully had intoxicants in his possession at sea, and failed to perform duties, and (3) on 1 October 1976, wrongfully failed to perform duties, at Savannah, Georgia. At the hearing, Appellant did not appear, although he had requested a change of venue for his own convenience and had received due notice of the change granted and of the scheduled hearing. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2145Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/8/19791/8/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2146 - AUNEThis decision is entered in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-3 (b). By order dated 12 August 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on nine months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master of the United States SS FRANCIS S. BUSHEY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 December 1976, Appellant did wrongfully sail the vessel from Yorktown, Virginia, to New York, N.Y., in violation of "your" Certificate of Inspection; to wit, sailing without the proper complement of officers and crew. (46 U.S.C. 222). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence several documents and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2146Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/8/19791/8/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2147 - ENNOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 3 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Tampa, Florida, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as First Class Pilot on board M/V ESTHER MORAN and tank barge NEW YORK under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 January 1977, during favorable weather, conditions, Appellant, while in charge of maneuvering said vessels, did (1) negligently allow NEW YORK to be maneuvered into the Tampa Electric Company pier, Tampa, Florida, thus causing a collision between the barge and the pier and damage both to the pier and to NEW YORK, and (2) negligently cause oil to be spilled into Sparkman Channel, Tampa, Florida, as a result of the aforementioned collision between NEW YORK and the Tampa Electric Company pier. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2147Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/8/19791/8/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2148 - LEVYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 December 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Boatswain on board the United States S.S. EAGLE LEADER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 10 October 1977, while said vessel was at sea, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter James McDuff, a member of the crew. The hearing was held at Corpus Christi, Texas, in two sessions: the first on 25 October 1977; and the second on 7 November 1977. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2148Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/30/19791/30/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2101 - KELLOGGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 April 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's licenses for 3 months outright plus 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master on board the United States SS EDGAR M. QUEENY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 31 January 1975, Appellant did not have "a competent person standing by in position to let the anchor go promptly as the vessel was maneuvering in congested waters," and that Appellant did "wrongfully fail to take positive action in sufficient time to prevent a collision with the SS CORINTHOS." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2101Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2102 - GABLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license and Merchant Marine documents for two months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of the charge of "negligence." The specification found proved alleges that while serving as First Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS EAGLE LEADER, under authority of the license and document above captioned, the Appellant "did on or about 18 March 1976 at approximately 1600 negligently energize the feedback circuit breaker on the generator switchboard thereby allowing 440 volts A.C. power from the emergency generator to flow to the main switchboard in the engine room creating a dangerous arc, all the while knowing that the main switchboard was disabled from an electrical casualty the day before and that engineering personnel were working in the vicinity of the main switchboard making a survey of the damage."Appeal No. 2102Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2103 - SNELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 27 October 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found alleges that Appellant, being the holder of the captioned document, was convicted on 8 May 1972 of a violation of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act of the State of Washington in King County Superior Court, a court of record, for possession and sale of a narcotic drug, to wit, heroin. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence various documentary evidence.Appeal No. 2103Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19775/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2104 - BENSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's license for 2 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while serving as a crewmember on board the M/V Thomas C.L. NUGENT while holding license above captioned, on or about 27 August 1976, Appellant wrongfully discharged oily bilge slops into the navigable waters of the United States, to wit, the Ohio River near Mile 572.0, causing a sheen upon the water's surface, a violation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public Law 92-500 (86 Stat. 816). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. No evidence was introduced.Appeal No. 2104Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19775/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2105 - BROWNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 21 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman document for 8 months outright plus 4 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Able Seaman/Quartermaster on board the United States SS GULFQUEEN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 6 March 1976, Appellant wrongfully committed assault and battery upon another member of the crew with his fists and a metal bucket. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by nonprofessional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.Appeal No. 2105Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/7/19776/7/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2106 - CARDWELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's license and other seaman's documents for two months subject to six months probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator and Person-in-Charge on board the M/V THOMAS C.L. NUGENT under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 August 1976, Appellant wrongfully permitted the discharge of oily bilge slops from that vessel in the navigable waters of the United States, to wit, the Ohio River near Mile 572.0, causing a sheen upon the water's surface, a violation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public Law 92-500 (86 Stat. 816). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2106Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/12/19779/12/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2107 - HARRISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Chicago admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS MORMACRIGEL under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 25 May 1976, Appellant "did... wrongfully fail to turn to, while said vessel was undocking from the port of Recife, Brazil." At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence exhibits consisting of a certified extract of the Shipping Articles from the MORMACRIGEL, a certified extract from the ship's official log, certified copy of the relevant page of the log, and the Investigating Officer's comments and conclusions regarding the exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony as to the accuracy of the log entries and as to the circumstances surrounding the incident reported in the log.Appeal No. 2107Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/27/19776/27/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2108 - ROYSEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's operator's license for two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, serving as operator on board the MULTNOMAH under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 4 September 1976, while said vessel was underway on the Columbia River, crossed the upstream sill of the Bonneville Lock and Dam, entering the navigation lock chamber against a red light and without authorization to enter, in violation of 33 CFR 207.718(d)(3) and 207.718(c). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of five witnesses and six exhibits consisting of documentary evidence.Appeal No. 2108Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/29/19776/29/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2111 - JENSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 January 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after hearing held at Port Arthur, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for two months plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as chief mate on board the United States SS TEXACO NORTH DAKOTA under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 2 and 3 October 1973, Appellant wrongfully failed to supervise the tank cleaning operations in progress which produced a combustible gas mixture accumulation in the after pumproom resulting in an explosion and fire while said vessel was underway in the Gulf of Mexico. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2111Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19779/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2112 - HOMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States Tug HUDSON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 23 August 1976, Appellant navigated his tow in a negligent manner such as to cause his tow to come in contact with the Long Island Bridge. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence CG Form 2692 Tug HUDSON, O.N. 249639, C.G. Form 2692 - Crane BARGE NO. 6, and a copy of U. S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey Chart No. 13270 39th Ed., 1 March 1975 of Boston Harbor. LT William MILLER, USCG, the casualty investigation officer, testified for the Investigating Officer.Appeal No. 2112Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/14/197711/14/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2113 - HINDSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's seaman's licenses for 1 month outright plus 2 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master/First Class Pilot on board the United States SS SPARTAN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 12 August 1976, Appellant: (1) wrongfully failed to obtain or properly use information available from radar observations, for the purpose of determining the safe course into Ludington Harbor, Michigan. (2) wrongfully failed to reduce the speed of his vessel during conditions of fog and restricted visibility.Appeal No. 2113Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/28/19782/28/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2114 - HULTZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 31 January 1977, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after hearing at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges in essence that while serving as operator of the tug H.C. JEFFERSON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 15 May 1976, Appellant endangered the lives of persons aboard a 16 foot pleasure craft in East Horseshoe Range, Delaware River, by proceeding at a speed excessive under the conditions, with a wake which caused the pleasure craft to be thrown against buoy #39. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and pleaded not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents and the testimony of two eyewitnesses who has been aboard the pleasure craft.Appeal No. 2114Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/1/19783/1/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2115 - CHRISTENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 August 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a messman on board the SS American Corsair under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 January 1971, Appellant: (1) wrongfully assaulted the saloon pantryman, Charles G. Pace, with intent to do harm by setting fire to his mattress while he was sleeping upon same; (2) wrongfully threatened to blow up the vessel, said vessel being the carrier of a cargo of military explosives; and (3) wrongfully lit matches on the main deck of said vessel with full knowledge that the vessel was carrying military explosives, and further, that said actions were deliberate. A fourth specification that Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties due to intoxication was found not proved. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2115Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/24/19783/24/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2116 - BAGGETTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a First Class Pilot on board the SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON under authority of the license captioned above, on or about 31 January 1976, Appellant failed to keep clear of overtaken vessels as required by the Inland Rules of the Road, thereby contributing to a collision between SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON, the tug D.T. SHERIDAN, and the barge SEA STAR. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and eighteen documentary exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, the testimony of seven witnesses and seven documentary exhibits.Appeal No. 2116Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19784/11/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2117 - AGUILARThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 March 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months outright plus twelve months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as AB seaman on board SS SANTA CLARA under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) at about 0315, 31 July 1976, at Cartagena, Colombia, wrongful fail to turn to for assigned undocking duties; (2) on 31 July 1976, at sea, wrongfully fail to performdutieson the 0400-0800 watch; (3) on 1 August 1976, at Cristobal, C.Z., wrongfully fail to turn to for undocking duties and to perform on the 1600-2000 watch. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of SANTA CLARA.Appeal No. 2117Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19784/11/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2118 - HEBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 22 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board the tank barge EXXON 267 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 July 1976, Appellant: wrongfully failed to properly supervise the transfer of bunker "C" oil to tank barge EXXON 267 at the Exxon facility at Chalmette, Louisiana, in that as person in charge he wrongfully failed to remain in the immediate vicinity of the transfer operation thereby contributing to the pollution of the Mississippi River, a navigable water of the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and one exhibit. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2118Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19784/11/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2119 - SMITHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 27 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a chief pumpman on board the United States SS AMERICAN EAGLE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 May 1977, Appellant wrongfully had in his possession marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the following documents: (1) Affidavit of Service of the Charges, (2) Copy of Form CG-735T, Master's Report of Seaman shipped or discharged, (3) Copy of Certificate of Discharge for Merchant Seaman to Ronald A. Smith, Sr., (4) Copy of Pay Voucher from American Eagle Tanker Corp., (5) Copies of Pages 37, 38, and 39 from the Official Logbook of the S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (not admitted) (6) Photo-copy of Page 42 of Official Logbook, S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (7) U.S. Customs Laboratory Report, (8) Chain of Custody for substance found on S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (9) Sworn Statement of Francis P. POWERS, Master, S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (10) Statement of Edward MALLON, Chief Officer, S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE. The chief engineer on board the SS AMERICAN EAGLE, Mr. James W. ECCLES, testified on behalf of the Investigating Officer.Appeal No. 2119Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/12/19784/12/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2184 - BAYLESSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The first specification found proved alleges that while serving as able bodied seaman on board SS GATEWAY CITY under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 25 February 1978, Appellant did wrongfully fail to join and desert said vessel, at Hong Kong, B.C.C. The second specification found proved alleges that while serving as able bodied seaman aboard SS MOBILE, under authority of the captioned documents, Appellant did on or about 2 june 1977 wrongfully fail to join said vessel at Hong Kong, B.C.C. The Hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 14 June 1978. Appellant did not appear at the hearing, and the hearing was held in absentia. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on behalf of Appellant.Appeal No. 2184Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19802/22/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2185 - JONESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 May 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, after a Hearing conducted at San Francisco, California, and New Orleans, Louisiana, on various dates between 17 January 1977 and 5 January 1978, suspended Appellant's document for a period of six months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The four specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as QMED aboard SS DELTA MAR, under authority of the captioned document did, on or about 26 October 1976, while said vessel was at sea: (1) wrongfully assault and batter by beating a member of the crew, Eugene Kyzar; (2) wrongfully assault and batter with a portable radio the vessel's Master, Peter J. Bourgeois; (3) wrongfully use foul and abusive language against the vessel's Master, Peter J.Bourgeois; and (4) wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the vessel's Master, Peter J. Bourgeois, in that Appellant failed to stop using obscene and profane language against said vessel's Master. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses, ten documents, three photographs, one item of physical evidence, and four depositions. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses, his own included, and two documents.Appeal No. 2185Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19802/22/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2189 - BEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 July 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, revoked Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving under the authority of his document aboard USNS MISPILLION on or about 4 September 1977, while on U.S. Naval Base, Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines, Appellant did have in his possession a narcotic drug, to wit: heroin. At the hearing, which comprised nine sessions, Appellant was at first represented by lay counsel but later retained professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence nineteen exhibits. Appellant submitted no defense.Appeal No. 2189Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/25/19803/25/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2201 - BROADNAXThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order rendered 12 January 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleged that while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 30 November 1972, Appellant was convicted by the Superior Court, State of California, In and for the County of Stanislaus, a court of record, for violation of Section 11500 of the California Health and Safety Code, a narcotic drug law violation. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on II January 1979. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence one composite exhibit. Appellant offered no evidence in defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 18 January 1979. Appeal was timely filed on 8 February 1979 and perfected on the same day.Appeal No. 2201Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/28/19804/28/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2135 - FOSSANIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 April 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him to be a user of a narcotic drug. The specification found proved alleges that on or about 8 October 1976, Appellant was, at or about [REDACTED] [REDACTED], New Jersey, wrongfully a user of a narcotic drug. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents and the testimony of several witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and that of his mother. At Appellant's request, the Administrative Law Judge arranged for examination of Appellant at U.S.P.H.S. Hospital, Staten Island, New York, and then himself called the examining physician as a witness. At the end of the hearing, the Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 20 May 1977. Appeal was timely filed, and perfected on 1 December 1977.Appeal No. 2135Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2109 - SMITHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of possession of a narcotic drug. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Third Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS PRESIDENT JEFFERSON under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 12 August 1976, Appellant was wrongfully in possession of heroin. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of four witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence one exhibit.Appeal No. 2109Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/18/19777/18/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2110 - WRETThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 27 January, 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months plus twelve months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a wiper on board the United States SS BALDBUTTE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 6 December 1976, Appellant assaulted and battered the chief engineer of the vessel with a crescent wrench, at Los Angeles, California. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents, photographs, and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and that of a witness.Appeal No. 2110Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19779/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2120 - MCLAUGHLINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code, Section 239b, and Title 46, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Tampa, Florida, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that, while being the holder of the above captioned document, on or about 7 June 1974, Appellant was convicted of a violation of Florida Statute 893.13(1)(e) in the Circuit Criminal Justice Court of Hillsborough County, Florida, for violation of a narcotic drug law. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel, and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence a certified copy of the Judgement of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation entered in Case No. 74-445 in the Circuit Criminal Justice Court of Hillsborough County, Florida, dated 7 June 1974. Following the introduction of the court records, Appellant made a statement on his own behalf under oath. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2120Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/19/19784/19/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2121 - GIBBLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as ordinary seaman on board the United States SS ARCO PRESTIGE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 March 1977, Appellant, while the vessel was at sea did wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics, to wit, marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and seven exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and the testimony of one witness. On 11 May 1977 the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and the specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision and order was served on 14 May 1977.Appeal No. 2121Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19775/23/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2122 - RODIECKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 24 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seamans's documents for 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct after hearing held at Tampa, Florida. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as operator on board M/T ADMIRAL LEFFLER under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 26 November 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully required [sic.] an unlicensed person to relieve him from his wheel watch and control the tug for approximately ten minutes while he left the bridge. (2) wrongfully failed to maintain a proper lookout, this failure contributing to the collision between the towed barge CECO 2501 and the motorboat FL-6138-BU with the loss of three lives. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2122Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/15/19786/15/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2123 - ARNOLDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's license for four months on ten months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the United States towing vessel TECUMSEH, O.N. 258 916 under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 5 August 1976, Appellant allowed the towing bridle between his vessel and the barge SKIPANON to go slack and drag on the bottom of the Coos River in a submarine cable area causing the submarine cable to be broken. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification found proved. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the sworn testimony of Mssrs. Don Dillon, Dennis Reynolds, Homer Blakeney, Steven Johnson, Orville Fuller, and Peter Busick, and the following documents: Affidavit of Service of the Charge; U.S. Army Engineer District, Portland; "Coos Bay, Oregon 35' Channel Modification General Plan"; U.S. Army Engineer District, Portland; "Coos Bay, Oregon 35' Channel Modification Coos Bay and Empire Ranges"; Statement of Steven Phillip Johnson of 28 January 1977.Appeal No. 2123Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/14/19786/14/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2077 - FARMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 January 1969 a Hearing Examiner, (now Administrative Law Judge) of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a fireman/watertender on board the United States SS YOUNG AMERICA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 11 August 1967, Appellant was wrongfully and unlawfully in possession of marijuana, a legally defined narcotic drug. Appellant did not enter an appearance at the hearing, after due notice of the time and place thereof. The Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification in Appellant's behalf. Appellant was not represented by counsel, but had been notified of his right to such representation.Appeal No. 2077Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/24/19769/24/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2078 - MCCOYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 31 March 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a third assistant engineer on board the United States SS DELTA MAR under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 20 January 1976, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties due to being under the influence of intoxicants. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduce in evidence entries from the.shipping articles and the official log as well as the testimony of the Chief Engineer. In defense, Appellant did not offer any evidence although he did testify concerning his sailing record.Appeal No. 2078Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/23/19769/23/197612/21/2017
Page 14 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.