CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2093 - BOOHERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 April 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Corpus Christi, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman documents. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a wiper on board the United States SS OVERSEAS ANCHORAGE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 December 1975, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a fellow crew member, Donald Gusis, with a deadly weapon, to wit, a pipe, while the vessel was at Novorossiysk, USSR. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of the SS OVERSEAS ANCHORAGE; an injury report concerning Mr. Gusis; sketches of the room occupied by Gusis and Booher; the weapon allegedly used; the testimony of the victim; and sworn statements of three crew members.Appeal No. 2093Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/28/19771/28/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2112 - HOMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States Tug HUDSON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 23 August 1976, Appellant navigated his tow in a negligent manner such as to cause his tow to come in contact with the Long Island Bridge. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence CG Form 2692 Tug HUDSON, O.N. 249639, C.G. Form 2692 - Crane BARGE NO. 6, and a copy of U. S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey Chart No. 13270 39th Ed., 1 March 1975 of Boston Harbor. LT William MILLER, USCG, the casualty investigation officer, testified for the Investigating Officer.Appeal No. 2112Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/14/197711/14/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2133 - SANDLINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master of SS LASH ITALIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 March 1976, Appellant neglected and failed to navigate the vessel with due caution which resulted in grounding of said vessel in Fort Sumter Channel, Charleston, South Carolina. A specification of "Misconduct," alleging that Appellant had wrongfully failed to give notice of that grounding in timely fashion was dismissed as not proved. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2133Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/25/19789/25/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2225 - LAWRENCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 March 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida , after a hearing at Cleveland, Ohio, on 14 February 1979, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard M/V SAM LAUD, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on or about 14 January 1979, while said vessel was in the port of Cleveland, Ohio, wrongfully fail to give notice of a marine casualty involving his vessel to the nearest Marine Inspection Office of the Coast Guard, to wit, Marine Safety Office, Cleveland, Ohio. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The investigation Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2225Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2041 - SISKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 May 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for the three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification as found proved alleges that while serving as operator of the towboat M/V JOSEPH M. JONES, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 26 February 1975, Appellant negligently overtook the M/V T.M. NORSWORTHY and tow and negligently attempted at Mile 636, Ohio River to pass it under circumstances involving risk of collision and without the assent or knowledge of the Pilot of the T.M. NORSWORTHY, which was then engaged in a difficult and dangerous flanking maneuver to round a bend under conditions of very high water and strong currents. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specificationAppeal No. 2041Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/29/197510/29/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2183 - FAIRALLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(G) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 April 1978, and administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of two specification of the charge of misconduct. The two specifications of misconduct found proved allege that Appellant, while serving aboard the SS MAYAGUEZ under authority of the above captioned document, (1) did, on 6 February 1977, wrongfully use foul and abusive language towards a superior officer, the Chief Mate, and (2) did, on 18 February 1977, while said vessel was in the Port of Keelung, Taiwan, wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Mate, by kicking him repeatedly. At the hearing, appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence eight document including the depositions of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered the testimony of three witnesses, including his own. Subsequent to the hearing the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in open hearing in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation.Appeal No. 2183Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/21/19802/21/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2102 - GABLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license and Merchant Marine documents for two months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of the charge of "negligence." The specification found proved alleges that while serving as First Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS EAGLE LEADER, under authority of the license and document above captioned, the Appellant "did on or about 18 March 1976 at approximately 1600 negligently energize the feedback circuit breaker on the generator switchboard thereby allowing 440 volts A.C. power from the emergency generator to flow to the main switchboard in the engine room creating a dangerous arc, all the while knowing that the main switchboard was disabled from an electrical casualty the day before and that engineering personnel were working in the vicinity of the main switchboard making a survey of the damage."Appeal No. 2102Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2212 - LAWSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months outright, plus a further suspension for six months on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification alleged that while serving as Ordinary Seaman on board SS AMERICAN LIBERTY under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 29 March 1979, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter a member of the crew, Luis A. Lopez, Z-819 077. The lesser included offense of wrongfully engaging in mutual combat with a member of the crew was found proved. The hearing was held at New York, after a change of venue from Savannah, Georgia, on 4, 6, and 25 April 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2212Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19805/23/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2215 - RILEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 January 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, on 29 November 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of one month on probation for three months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard GULF FLEET NO. 22, under authority of the captioned documents, did, from 10 to 24 November 1978, fail to comply with the manning requirements as set forth in the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, to wit: sailing without a licensed engineer and one able seaman. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of one witness and four documents.Appeal No. 2215Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2080 - FULTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 18 July 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the SS NOTRE DAME VICTORY under authority of the license and document above captioned, on 30 Jaunuary 1975, Appellant did hazard his vessel by proceeding up the Delaware River in an unsafe manner without assistance of tugboats when the vessel's ship's service generator was inoperable and the portable 500 kw generator was operating in an unreliable manner and there were no immediate backup ship's service generating capabilities. A second charge concerning an improper logging was dismissed. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2080Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/8/197610/8/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2175 - RIVERAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 18 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Juan, Puerto Rico, suspended Appellant's license for one month and for an additional two months on four months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant while serving as Pilot aboard SS PONCE DE LEON, under authority of his license and document, on 7 December 1976 negligently navigated SS PONCE DE LEON without the use of available tugboats while the vessel was attempting to negotiate the turn from Army Terminal Channel to Puerto Nuevo Channel, Bahia de San Juan, Puerto Rico, thereby contributing to a collision between the PONCE DE LEON and Puerto Nuevo Terminal Dock. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2175Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19801/3/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2115 - CHRISTENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 August 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a messman on board the SS American Corsair under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 January 1971, Appellant: (1) wrongfully assaulted the saloon pantryman, Charles G. Pace, with intent to do harm by setting fire to his mattress while he was sleeping upon same; (2) wrongfully threatened to blow up the vessel, said vessel being the carrier of a cargo of military explosives; and (3) wrongfully lit matches on the main deck of said vessel with full knowledge that the vessel was carrying military explosives, and further, that said actions were deliberate. A fourth specification that Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties due to intoxication was found not proved. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2115Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/24/19783/24/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2131 - NUNEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 August 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while acting under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant altered the license by changing the date of issue from 22 February 1972 to 22 February 22 1973. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and documents relative to the issuance of license no. 103934. In defense, Appellant offered an unsworn statement. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 22 August 1977. Appeal was timely filed.Appeal No. 2131Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/4/19788/4/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2052 - NELSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 December 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three (3) months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. Under the charge of negligence the specifications found proved allege that while serving as pilot aboard the M/V GEORGE PRINCE under the authority of the license above captioned, on 4 February 1974 Appellant wrongfully failed to (1) keep out of the way of a privileged vessel in a crossing situation, (2) timely slacken speed, stop, or reverse to avoid collision with a privileged vessel in a crossing situation, (3) keep a proper lookout, and (4) adequately utilize electronic navigational equipment available to him for the purpose of effecting a safe passage across the Mississippi River at about mile 120.7 above Head of Passes, all of which contributed to a collision between the M/V GEORGE PRINCE and the M/V F. R. BIGELOW and tow. Under the charge of misconduct the specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot aboard the M/V GEORGE PRINCE under the authority of the license above captioned, on 4 February 1974 Appellant wrongfully failed to sound a one whistle signal as required by 33 U.S.C. 344, while in a condition covered by that section. A second specification under the charge of misconduct, alleging that Appellant failed to sound the danger signal as required by 33 U.S.C. 344, was found not proved by the Administrative Law Judge.Appeal No. 2052Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/22/19763/22/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2207 - CLARKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 January 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleged that while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 23 June 1969, Appellant was convicted by the Criminal Court of the City of New York, a court of record, for the possession of a dangerous drug, to wit: heroin. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 4 January 1979. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three documents. Appellant offered no evidence in defense.Appeal No. 2207Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/19/19805/19/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2169 - FOSSANIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as "Operator on board MV SUPER CAT under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 5 January 1977, Appellant committed eight assaults or assaults and batteries on, or uttered threats to, four passengers aboard SUPER CAT. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of several witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of certain witnesses and certain documents.Appeal No. 2169Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/5/197911/5/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2064 - WOODThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 September 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a messman on board the United States SS PRESIDENT CLEVELAND under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 17 December 1972, Appellant did "wrongfully assault and batter a fellow crewmember, Ronald B. K. Lyman, to wit with a 'buck' knife and that it resulted in his death." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence portions of the ship's logbook, statements made before the U.S. Vice-Consul in Hong Kong by witnesses to the incident, and other documentary evidence, and also called two witnesses to testify. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence portions of the ship's log. He also testified on his own behalf and made several offers of proof.Appeal No. 2064Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/14/19767/14/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2159 - MILICIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.301. By order dated 2 February 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months outright plus four months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an able bodied seaman on board the United States SS TRANSINDIANA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 25 June 1976, Appellant assaulted and battered another member of the crew, one Horace Serrette, also an AB seaman. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records and the testimony of Horace Serrette. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. Later, the testimony of one Morales, taken by deposition on written interrogatories, was entered in evidence by the Investigating Officer. After the hearing, the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of two months outright plus four months on twelve months' probation. The entire decision was served on 14 February 1977. Appeal was timely filed and perfected on 7 November 1977.Appeal No. 2159Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/15/19798/15/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2082 - JOHNSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 2 June 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an able seaman on board the United States SS PRESIDENT MCKINLEY under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 23 December 1975, Appellant without provocation committed wrongful assault and battery with his fists upon the vessel's Boatswain. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and one specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and one specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision and order was served on 2 June 1676.Appeal No. 2082Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/28/197610/28/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2202 - VAILThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 2 November 1978, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Deck Maintenanceman on board SS PRESIDENT HARRISON under the authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 March 1978, Appellant wrongfully had in his possession hashish and marihuana; and on the same date wrongfully became under the influence of narcotics. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, in two sessions, on 21 July 1978 and 2 November 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and seven documentary exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and one exhibit. The exhibit was marked for identification but not admitted as competent evidence. Initially the specifications did not identify the specific narcotic substances involved. At the conclusion of the evidence the Administrative Law Judge, sua sponte amended the charge to identify hashish and marihuana. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and both specifications had been proved. He served a written order on Appellant on 14 December 1978 revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 15 December 1978. Appeal was timely filed and perfected.Appeal No. 2202Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/28/19804/28/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2136 - DILLONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 2 September, 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master of SS COVE COMMUNICATOR under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 1 May 1977, Appellant "wrongfully departed a port of the United States, to wit: New Orleans, Louisiana, to sea with less than 65 per centrum of the deck crew, exclusive of licensed officers, of said vessel holding a rating of able seaman." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and several pertinent voyage records of COVE COMMUNICATOR. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of two months on six months' probation.Appeal No. 2136Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2241 - NIEDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 20 December 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, after a hearing at Long Beach, California, on 29 November 1978, suspended Appellant's documents for a period of three months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The single specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as pilot aboard M/T LION OF CALIFORNIA, under authority of his captioned documents, did on or about 19 September 1978, at 1759, navigate the vessel in a negligent manner so as to cause an allision between the vessel and M/V GLOMAR EXPLORER in Slip 240, Los Angeles Harbor. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer offered into evidence, without objection from Appellant, numerous copies of documents. It was stipulated between the parties that Appellant was serving as Pilot on board the LION OF CALIFORNIA at all times material and pertinent to the issue at hand, and that he had given all engine and rudder commands. The Investigating Officer introduced no further evidence.Appeal No. 2241Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/2/19814/2/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2233 - WALSHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 20 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Tankerman on board MORANIA 140 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 October 1979, Appellant, as person in charge of cargo loading, negligently allowed a cargo tank to overflow, spilling fuel oil on the deck of the barge and into Arthur Kill, a navigable water of the United States, by not monitoring the level in the tank after it had been secured. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 29 November 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documents, one of which comprised the stipulated testimony of an eyewitness to the event in question.Appeal No. 2233Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2049 - OWENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 21 April 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 6 months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the M/V MAMA LERE under authority of the licenses above captioned, on or about 29 January 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully failed to maintain a proper lookout while navigating during a period of reduced visibility, thereby contributing to a collision between the M/V MAMA LERE and the SS AMERICAN WHEAT and (2) wrongfully failed to sound proper fog signals during a period of reduced visibility.Appeal No. 2049Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/8/19763/8/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2105 - BROWNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 21 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman document for 8 months outright plus 4 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Able Seaman/Quartermaster on board the United States SS GULFQUEEN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 6 March 1976, Appellant wrongfully committed assault and battery upon another member of the crew with his fists and a metal bucket. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by nonprofessional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.Appeal No. 2105Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/7/19776/7/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2066 - GILLMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 21 January 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for three months outright plus six months on fifteen months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the tug SACHEM, with the barge THE CLYDE in tow, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 26 July 1975, Appellant did, while said vessels were on Lake Erie, FIRST, wrongfully navigate the barge THE CLYDE without navigation lights displayed as required by the Great Lakes Rules of the Road, and SECOND, wrongfully navigate the tug SACHEM without keeping a proper lookout as required by the Great Lakes Rules of the Road. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2066Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/20/19767/20/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2081 - BAILEY.PDFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 21 June 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for six months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) While serving aboard the SEATRAIN MARYLAND as a Fireman/Watertender, (a) on 7 February 1969, wrongfully failed to join his vessel on its departure from Sattahip, Thailand. (2) While serving aboard the SS RAPHAEL SEMMES as a Fireman/Watertender, (a) on 9 April 1969, Appellant wrongfully failed to join his vessel on its departure from Qui Nhon, South Viet Nam; (b) on 9 May 1969, Appellant was wrongfully absent from his vessel and duties; and (c) on 20 June 1969, turned over the last hour of his 2000 to 2400 port watch to another crew member without authority and was thereafter absent from his vessel and duties. Appellant then failed to stand his 0800 to 1200 sea watch on 21 June 1969.Appeal No. 2081Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/27/197610/27/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2068 - REEDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 22 December 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a messman on board the United States SS DEL SOL under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant on or about, (1) 28 September 1975, did wrongfully fail to turn to while the SS DEL SOL was in the foreign port of Matadi, Zaire, Africa; (2) 8,9,10,11,12 and 13 October 1975, did wrongfully fail to turn to while the SS DEL SOL was in the foreign port of Port Harcourt, Nigeria, Africa; (3) 13 October 1975, did wrongfully fail to join the SS DEL SOL in the foreign port of Port Harcourt, Nigeria, Africa. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2068Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/2/19768/2/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2118 - HEBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 22 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board the tank barge EXXON 267 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 July 1976, Appellant: wrongfully failed to properly supervise the transfer of bunker "C" oil to tank barge EXXON 267 at the Exxon facility at Chalmette, Louisiana, in that as person in charge he wrongfully failed to remain in the immediate vicinity of the transfer operation thereby contributing to the pollution of the Mississippi River, a navigable water of the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and one exhibit. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2118Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19784/11/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2228 - DAVISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after a hearing at Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 May and 2 August 1979, revoked the captioned document upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as able seaman aboard SS OVERSEAS ULLA, under authority of the above captioned document, did, on or about 15 May 1979, while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully assault and batter by beating with his fists a member of the crew, Lennie C. Jones; and (2) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did on or about 15 May 1979, wrongfully assault with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a pair of pliers, a member of the crew, Lennie C. Jones. Appellant did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, which was held in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence four documents and one deposition. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge entered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and both specifications as alleged had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation.Appeal No. 2228Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/13/19808/13/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2153 - MCKINNEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 February 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Buffalo, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 9 months upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specifications upon which hearing was held were, after amendments made on the record: "FIRST: In that you, while serving as Master aboard EILEEN C - which was pushing the tank barge NEPCO 140, under authority of the captioned documents -- being the holder of the captioned documents, did -- on or about 23 June 1976 while said vessel was navigating the St. Lawrence River, fail to properly maintain, or to have maintained, the position of the tug, during conditions of reduced visibility due to fog, while approaching an anchorage area, resulting in the grounding of the NEPCO 140 on a shoal near LB - 217, off Mason Point, New York. "SECOND In that you, while serving as Master aboard EILEEN C, under authority of the captioned documents, being the holder of the captioned documents, did on or about 23 June 1976, while said vessel was navigating the St. Lawrence River, fail to post a person assigned the sole duty of lookout, for the purpose of keeping a proper lookout."Appeal No. 2153Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/30/19794/30/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2244 - JAHNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Pilot on board SS CORNUCOPIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 December 1979, while said vessel was enroute from San Francisco to Stockton, Appellant failed to properly maintain control of said vessel, resulting in CORNUCOPIA's colliding with and damaging Beacon #11 (LLNR891) an established U.S. aid to navigation; and that while serving as aforesaid, did fail to properly maintain control of said vessel resulting in its grounding. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 6 and 28 February and 7 and 14 March 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2244Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/28/19814/28/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2043 - FISHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 October 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for two months on twenty four months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board M/V GOODTIME under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 4 August 1974, Appellant negligently operated the vessel so as to endanger an eighteen foot glastron boat, owned and operated by Ray E. PARKER, while in the vicinity of Swett Point on the Sasanoa River, in that he passed in a meeting situation at such a speed as to cause an excessive wake. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2043Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/197512/10/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2070 - PAYNEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 24 February 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for one month outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the M/V MALASPINA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 21 June 1975, Appellant did violate 33 CFR 80.6 by attempting to overtake and pass the F/V FOREST in Olga Strait, Alaska, without proposing a means to safely do so and without obtaining a prior assent; thus, by failing to make his intentions known, did contribute to a collision with said vessel with resultant loss of life to the operator. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a number of exhibits and stipulations, and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2070Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/1/19769/1/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2091 - ERNSERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 24 May 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's license for one month outright plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot on board the United States SS GULFKNIGHT under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 May 1975, Appellant, while navigating said vessel in Carquinez Strait, negligently allowed said vessel to collide with the Ozol pier, a properly charted fixed structure, in Martinez California. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses, as well as fourteen exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2091Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/31/19771/31/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2122 - RODIECKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 24 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seamans's documents for 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct after hearing held at Tampa, Florida. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as operator on board M/T ADMIRAL LEFFLER under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 26 November 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully required [sic.] an unlicensed person to relieve him from his wheel watch and control the tug for approximately ten minutes while he left the bridge. (2) wrongfully failed to maintain a proper lookout, this failure contributing to the collision between the towed barge CECO 2501 and the motorboat FL-6138-BU with the loss of three lives. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2122Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/15/19786/15/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2247 - LUKOWSKIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 24 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Ship's Utilityman on board the United States SS B.T. SAN DIEGO under authority of the document above captioned, on or above 4 April 1979, while the vessel was moored in Port Angeles, Washington, Appellant assaulted Boatswain Theodore Levy. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 3 and 29 August and 24 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2247Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19816/3/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2236 - CLUFFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, suspended Appellant's United States Coast Guard First Class Pilot's License No. 457718 for 3 months on 12 month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot on board M/V MOSEL under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 2 March 1979, while the said vessel in the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, Appellant failed to navigate the vessel with due caution, thereby causing an allision between the raised heavy lift boom of the vessel and the Reedy Point Bridge. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 22 May 1979 and adjourned to 7 September 1979, on which date it was concluded. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2236Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/23/19812/23/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2156 - EDWARDSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 July 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after a hearing at Savannah, Georgia, on 3 May, 4 May, and 14 June 1978, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as third assistant engineer aboard the dredge M/V MANHATTAN ISLAND, under authority of the captioned documents, did at or about 1000, 18 April 1978, while the vessel was anchored in the Savannah River, Savannah, Georgia, use abusive and foul language toward the Master of the vessel, Captain Leroy A. PLATT; and(2) that Appellant, while serving as third assistant engineer aboard the dredge M/V MANHATTAN ISLAND, under authority of the captioned documents, did at or about 1210, 18 April 1978, while said vessel was moored in the Savannah River, Savannah, Georgia,wrongfully assault and batter by choking with his hands the Master of the vessel, Captain Leroy A. PLATT. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of six witnesses, three documents, and one photograph. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of five witnesses, his own included, and five documents.Appeal No. 2156Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/25/19797/25/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2134 - JOHNSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master on board the United States SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 March 1977, Appellant failed to post a proper watch to attend the stern towing line leading from SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON to the tug TONY ST. PHILLIP. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending Appellant's license for a period of three months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 2134Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2230 - SOLLINEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Bach, California, suspended Appellant's documents for two months, on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that, while serving as First Assistant Engineer on board the SS KEYSTONE CANYOU under authority of the captioned documents on or about 23 August 1979, Appellant wrongfully engaged in mutual combat with crewmember Clarence Crocker by strikining him with his fists and shoving him, while the vessel was at sea. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 30 August and 13 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence three exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of five witnesses, including his own testimony.Appeal No. 2230Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/18/19808/18/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2127 - CHAPMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 April 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master on board M/V VIRGINIA CLIPPER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 April 1977, Appellant wrongfully navigated the vessel from Baltimore, Maryland, to Norfolk, Virginia, without having on board one of the licensed engineers required by the certificate of inspection, in violation of 46 U.S.C. 222(R.S. 4436). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel, the president of the company which owns VIRGINIA CLIPPER, and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. Despite the plea of guilty, the Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a copy of the certificate of inspection of the vessel.Appeal No. 2127Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/18/19787/18/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2021 - BURKEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 August 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him incompetent. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a second mate on board SS MISSOURI under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 3 November 1973, Appellant was, and at the time of hearing was still, mentally incompetent to perform the duties for which he held the license and documents issued by the Coast Guard. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records, the testimony of witnesses, given both in person and by deposition, and certain medical records.Appeal No. 2021Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/7/19755/7/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2139 - DANCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month on three months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board the United States tank barge BAYOU TECHE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 12 May 1977, Appellant did "transfer asphalt in said barge while not having sufficient capacity with the deck discharge containment." At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses. Appellant testified in his own behalf. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge reserved decision. He later concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of one month on three months' probation.Appeal No. 2139Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2184 - BAYLESSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The first specification found proved alleges that while serving as able bodied seaman on board SS GATEWAY CITY under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 25 February 1978, Appellant did wrongfully fail to join and desert said vessel, at Hong Kong, B.C.C. The second specification found proved alleges that while serving as able bodied seaman aboard SS MOBILE, under authority of the captioned documents, Appellant did on or about 2 june 1977 wrongfully fail to join said vessel at Hong Kong, B.C.C. The Hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 14 June 1978. Appellant did not appear at the hearing, and the hearing was held in absentia. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on behalf of Appellant.Appeal No. 2184Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19802/22/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2110 - WRETThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 27 January, 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months plus twelve months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a wiper on board the United States SS BALDBUTTE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 6 December 1976, Appellant assaulted and battered the chief engineer of the vessel with a crescent wrench, at Los Angeles, California. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents, photographs, and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and that of a witness.Appeal No. 2110Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19779/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2119 - SMITHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 27 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a chief pumpman on board the United States SS AMERICAN EAGLE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 May 1977, Appellant wrongfully had in his possession marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the following documents: (1) Affidavit of Service of the Charges, (2) Copy of Form CG-735T, Master's Report of Seaman shipped or discharged, (3) Copy of Certificate of Discharge for Merchant Seaman to Ronald A. Smith, Sr., (4) Copy of Pay Voucher from American Eagle Tanker Corp., (5) Copies of Pages 37, 38, and 39 from the Official Logbook of the S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (not admitted) (6) Photo-copy of Page 42 of Official Logbook, S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (7) U.S. Customs Laboratory Report, (8) Chain of Custody for substance found on S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (9) Sworn Statement of Francis P. POWERS, Master, S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (10) Statement of Edward MALLON, Chief Officer, S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE. The chief engineer on board the SS AMERICAN EAGLE, Mr. James W. ECCLES, testified on behalf of the Investigating Officer.Appeal No. 2119Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/12/19784/12/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2062 - O'CALLAGHANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 August 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for six months and revoked the "Radar observer" endorsement thereon upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while acting under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 3 August 1973, Appellant wrongfully and knowingly obtained from the United States Coast Guard, at Coast Guard Marine Inspection Office, Baltimore, Maryland, a renewal of an existing radar endorsement on his Master's license No. 441480, through the presentation of a false document attesting to his satisfactory completion of the Radar Safety and Navigation Course at the Maritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies, which course he had in truth and in fact not satisfactorily completed, the false document concerned being: Maritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies Certificate of Advanced Training Collision Avoidance Radar, dated 26 January 1973, which document, if valid, would have lawfully entitled him to said endorsement under the authority of 46 CFR 10.02-9(b)(5).Appeal No. 2062Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/8/19767/8/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2074 - LOWENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 August 1975, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked the radar observer endorsement issued to Appellant and suspended his licenses for a period of six months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 August 1973, Appellant did wrongfully and knowingly obtain from the United States Coast Guard, at Coast Guard Marina Inspection Office, Baltimore, Maryland, a renewal of a radar endorsement to his Master's license No. 441494, through the presentation of a false document attesting to his satisfactory completion of the Radar Safety and Navigation Course at the Maritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies, which course he had in truth and in fact not satisfactorily completed; the false document concerned being, Maritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies' Certificate of Advanced Training Collision Avoidance Radar, dated 26 January 1973, which document, if valid, would have lawfully entitled him to said endorsement under the authority of 46 CFR 10.02-9(a) (5).Appeal No. 2074Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19769/20/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2209 - SIEGELMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, after a hearing at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 16 July 1979, suspended Appellant's document for a period of four months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as able seaman aboard SS AUSTRAL ENDURANCE, under authority of his Merchant Mariner's Document did, at or about 1210 on 1 July 1979, while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully commit an assault and battery without legal cause, provocation, or justification upon the person of one Phillip MOULIC, causing serious and severe bodily harm to him. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses, and two documents. In defense Appellant testified and introduced into evidence two documents.Appeal No. 2209Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19805/20/198012/21/2017
Page 18 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.