CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2140 - FOMICHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January, 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for ten months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS EAGLE VOYAGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 July 1976, Appellant assaulted another crewmember with a dangerous weapon; on 19 and 20 July 1976, failed to perform duties aboard the vessel; on 24 July 1976 failed to join the vessel at Iljichevsk, U.S.S.R. At the hearing, Appellant failed to appear, and a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification was entered by the Administrative Law Judge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of EAGLE VOYAGER, the testimony of one Abdulla A. Mohsin, and a deposition of one David H. Regester, Jr., taken pursuant to order. There was no defense.Appeal No. 2140Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2235 - RABRENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 November 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Pilot on board SS GULF TIGER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 August 1978, Appellant did, while inbound in Tampa Bay, Florida, wrongfully ground said vessel. A second specification, found not proved, alleged that while serving in the above capacity Appellant negligently piloted said vessel at excessive speed, thereby contributing to the grounding. The hearing was held at Tampa, Florida, on 22 November 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2235Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2242 - JACKSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 August 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellants' seaman's documents upon finding them guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved in each case alleges that while serving on board SS DELTA PARAGUAY under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 7 July 1978, Appellants, at or about the steering engine room on board DELTA PARAGUAY did wrongfully have in their possession certain narcotics, to wit, marijuana. The hearing was held in joinder at Houston, Texas, on 20 and 31 July 1978. At the hearing, Appellants elected to act as their own counsel and entered pleas of not guilty to the charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2242Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/2/19814/2/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2107 - HARRISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Chicago admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS MORMACRIGEL under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 25 May 1976, Appellant "did... wrongfully fail to turn to, while said vessel was undocking from the port of Recife, Brazil." At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence exhibits consisting of a certified extract of the Shipping Articles from the MORMACRIGEL, a certified extract from the ship's official log, certified copy of the relevant page of the log, and the Investigating Officer's comments and conclusions regarding the exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony as to the accuracy of the log entries and as to the circumstances surrounding the incident reported in the log.Appeal No. 2107Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/27/19776/27/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2173 - PIERCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 July 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot aboard the SS RICE QUEEN, under the authority of the above-captioned license, on or about 19 December 1977, Appellant, while the vessel was underway within Suisun Bay, negligently failed to take precautions necessary to prevent the collision of the SS RICE QUEEN with Suisun Bay Light 31 (LLNR 872.20). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence a stipulation of facts.Appeal No. 2173Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/28/197911/28/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2124 - BARROWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 3 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida suspended Appellant's license for 2 months outright plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Master on board the motor tug ESTHER MORAN made fast to the stern of the tank barge NEW YORK under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 January 1977, Appellant did negligently abdicate his position and negligently fail to perform his duties as master by placing himself in such a position that he was unable to take the necessary actions to avert the collision between the T/B NEW YORK and the Tampa Electric Company dock. A second specification alleging that Appellant did negligently cause oil to be spilled in Sparkman Channel, Tampa, Florida as a result of a collision between the T/B NEW YORK and the Tampa Electric Company dock was found not proved.Appeal No. 2124Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/15/19786/15/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2147 - ENNOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 3 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Tampa, Florida, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as First Class Pilot on board M/V ESTHER MORAN and tank barge NEW YORK under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 January 1977, during favorable weather, conditions, Appellant, while in charge of maneuvering said vessels, did (1) negligently allow NEW YORK to be maneuvered into the Tampa Electric Company pier, Tampa, Florida, thus causing a collision between the barge and the pier and damage both to the pier and to NEW YORK, and (2) negligently cause oil to be spilled into Sparkman Channel, Tampa, Florida, as a result of the aforementioned collision between NEW YORK and the Tampa Electric Company pier. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2147Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/8/19791/8/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2155 - HORNEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 3 March 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for 1 month on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as master aboard SS ACHILLES, under authority of his license and document, on or about 9 January 1978, wrongfully failed to plot the position of SS ACHILLES while navigating from naval anchorage "A", Narragansett Bay, East Passage, to Mount Hope Bay, Rhode Island; and (2) that Appellant while serving as master of SS ACHILLES, under authority of his license and document, "wrongfully navigated the vessel in violation of the vessel's certificate of inspection from 17 December 1977 to 9 January 1978; to wit; the vessel's tailshaft was due to be drawn no later than 31 October 1977." At the hearing, Appellant was initially represented by professional counsel, who was subsequently disqualified by the Administrative Law Judge on motion of the Coast Guard Investigating Officer. Appellant then entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2155Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/11/19795/11/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2047 - VALLADARESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 April 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for nine months outright plus three months on 15 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a fireman on board the United States SS SAN JUAN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 September 1973, at Port Elizabeth, New Jersey, Appellant: (1) assaulted and battered one Robert Hyer, a crewmember of the vessel; (2) assaulted and battered one James R. Wilson, a crewmember of the vessel; and (3) assaulted and battered one Stephen Bertrand, second officer of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Since Appellant himself did not appear, the Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2047Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/3/19762/3/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2253 - KIELYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 April 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve month's probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Mate on board SS WORTH under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 2 June 1978, at Texaco Eagle Point Westville, New Jersey, on the Delaware River, Appellant failed to adequately supervise a ballast loading operation on his vessel, causing pollution of the navigable waters of the United States. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 15 October and 7 December 1979, 17 and 29 January 1980, and 30 April 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to each charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence statements of the Second Mate, Mr. William T. Smith; an affidavit of service on Appellant of 5 October 1979 by the Investigating Officer; and a Master's Report of Seaman Shipped or Discharged (CG-735(T)) dated 17 October 1979 for SS WORTH.Appeal No. 2253Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2099 - HOLDERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 July 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months outright plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while serving as an "oiler" on board the United States SS MORMACPRIDE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 17-18 October 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully failed to perform his duties from 2000 to 2400 hours due to intoxication while the vessel was in the port of New York, (2) wrongfully failed to properly perform his duties from 0800 to 0830 hours by making false entries in the engine room oiler's log sheet while the vessel was at sea, and (3) wrongfully assaulted and battered a licensed officer, to wit, the Third Assistant Engineer, C. Ferneza, with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a clipboard, while the vessel was at sea. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2099Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2026 - CLARKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 March 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a bedroom utility (OBR) on board the United States SS PIONEER CONTRACTOR under authority of the document above captioned, between 7 December 1972 and 28 February 1973, Appellant was wrongfully a user of a narcotic drug. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing and after the Administrative Law Judge questioned the Investigating Officer concerning the circumstances surrounding service of charges and notice of the hearing a motion to proceed in absentia was granted. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to all charges and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and a certification of the applicable shipping articles.Appeal No. 2026Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19756/5/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2050 - WIJNGAARDEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 May 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Electrician on board the SS SHIRLEY LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant did FIRST, on or about 15 August 1974, wrongfully fail to perform his duties while in a foreign port; SECOND, on or about 29 August 1974, while in a foreign port, wrongfully assault with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a knife, a member of the crew, Luis Cortes; THIRD, on or about 29 August 1974, while in a foreign port, wrongfully assault a member of the crew, Willie Lewis.Appeal No. 2050Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/18/19763/18/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2109 - SMITHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of possession of a narcotic drug. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Third Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS PRESIDENT JEFFERSON under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 12 August 1976, Appellant was wrongfully in possession of heroin. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of four witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence one exhibit.Appeal No. 2109Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/18/19777/18/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2042 - KELLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 October 1974, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Chief Engineer on board the SS JOHN B. WATERMAN, while the vessel was at sea, under authority of the document and license above captioned, Appellant did: (1) on 10 February 1974, at about 0800, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the Master in that he failed to report to the Master's office to be logged, (2) on 10 February 1974, at about 0735, use abusive language toward the Master, (3) on 10 February 1974, at about 1300, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the master in that he failed to report to the master's office to be logged, (4) on 4 April 1974, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the master in that he failed to have the engine watchstander's quarters soogeed, and (5) on 4 April 1974, use abusive language toward the master.Appeal No. 2042Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/29/197511/29/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2078 - MCCOYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 31 March 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a third assistant engineer on board the United States SS DELTA MAR under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 20 January 1976, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties due to being under the influence of intoxicants. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduce in evidence entries from the.shipping articles and the official log as well as the testimony of the Chief Engineer. In defense, Appellant did not offer any evidence although he did testify concerning his sailing record.Appeal No. 2078Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/23/19769/23/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2142 - MALCOLMThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after hearing held on 22 July 1977 at Detroit, Michigan, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board HANNAH 2902 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 18 July 1977, Appellant did, "while said barge was transferring Bunker C at Mistersky Power Plant, Detroit, Michigan, wrongfully absent himself from said barge while transferring." At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents and the testimony of three witnesses. There was no defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months plus three months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 2142Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2223 - HEWITTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 4 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, suspended Appellant's documents for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while acting under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 May 1979, Appellant wrongfully and fraudulently executed a false application for a raise in grade of his licensed to Master by certifying that he had not made application for a license and been rejected within twelve months. A second specification concerning an unfair practice allegedly occurring on 26 April 1979 in New York was dismissed. The hearing was held at Baltimore on 12 June 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence three documents.Appeal No. 2223Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2086 - ERIKSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 April 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license and all other documents for 1 month outright plus 2 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the United States M/V PIONEER under authority of the license above described, on or about 27 January 1976, Appellant "did wrongfully lose control of (the) vessel's tow, the barge `BARGE 412', allowing it to collide with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' survey boat CARLSON moored at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Depot Dock, Hutchinson Island," Savannah, Georgia. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2086Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/3/197612/3/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2227 - MANDLYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United Stated Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for 3 months on 12 months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Chief Officer on board the SS AUSTRAL ENDURANCE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 June 1978, Appellant failed to properly supervise maintenance work being performed on the starboard lifeboat gear and that this failure to supervise led to an injury being suffered by Cadet Edward Coll. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 15 June and 16, 23 and 24 July 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2227Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/30/19807/30/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2204 - PIERCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, after a hearing on various dates between 11 July and 26 November 1979, suspended Appellant's license for a period of six months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The single specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as pilot aboard SS DEL ORO, under authority of the captioned document, did, on or about 13 June 1979, negligently fail to properly maneuver and control said vessel thus running it aground in the San Joaquin River between buoys numbers 49 and 51. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and six documents. In defense, Appellant presented no evidence. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge entered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification as alleged had been proved. He then entered an order of suspension for a period of six months. The decision was served on 6 December 1979. Appeal was timely filed on 7 December 1979, and perfected on 5 February 1980.Appeal No. 2204Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/12/19805/12/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2206 - CREWSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 February 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months, plus twelve months on twenty four months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as able seaman on board SS COVE LEADER under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) on or about 21 September 1978 failed to perform assigned duties at Odessa, U.S.S.R., (2) on or about 12 October 1978 failed to perform assigned duties by reason of intoxication, (3) on 12 October 1978 at Odessa, U.S.S.R., wrongfully brought intoxicants aboard the vessel, (4) on 12 October 1978 at Poti, U.S.S.R., failed to perform assigned duties, and (5) on 20 October 1978 at Poti, U.S.S.R., failed to perform assigned duties. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 15 November 1978 and, after a change of venue requested by Appellant, at Houston, Texas, on 27 November 1978. Appellant did not appear for hearing. The Administrative Law Judge at Houston entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and all specifications and properly proceeded in the absence of Appellant. The Investigating Officer introduced several documents into evidence. There was no defense. After the hearing, on 5 February 1979, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months plus twelve months on twenty four months' probation. The entire decision was served on 21 February 1979. Appeal was timely filed.Appeal No. 2206Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/12/19805/12/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2059 - LESKINENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 November 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after a hearing at Detroit, Michigan, on 25 February 1975, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The single specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master of M/V H. LEE WHITE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 11 December 1974, Appellant, while directing the navigation of that vessel upbound in restricted waters, wrongfully failed to navigate the vessel with caution; notwithstanding the fact that information of the proximity and approach of another vessel was available to him (from radar observations) thereby contributing to a collision between his vessel and M/V GEORGIOS A while that vessel was downbound in the St. Clair River. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2059Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/2/19766/2/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2211 - DUNCANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator on board the tug KATHRYNE E. MCALLISTER, under authority of the license above captioned, at or about 0100, 28 November 1978, Appellant failed to navigate said vessel and its tow, the tank barge CIBRO PHILADELPHIA, with due caution, resulting in the grounding of CIBRO PHILADELPHIA on Mill Rock, East River, N.Y., and the subsequent discharge of 942 barrels of #2 oil into the East River. The hearing was held at New York, New York, in four sessions during March and April, 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2211Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/22/19805/22/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2218 - LASKIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 April 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Master on board SS TRANSINDIANA under authority of the license above captioned, on 11 October 1978, Appellant wrongfully failed to navigate with due caution as the burdened vessel by failing to keep out of the way of SS ROBERT E. LEE in a crossing situation, in violation of Rules 15 and 16 of the International Rules of the Road. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 6 February 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2218Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19806/4/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2108 - ROYSEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's operator's license for two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, serving as operator on board the MULTNOMAH under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 4 September 1976, while said vessel was underway on the Columbia River, crossed the upstream sill of the Bonneville Lock and Dam, entering the navigation lock chamber against a red light and without authorization to enter, in violation of 33 CFR 207.718(d)(3) and 207.718(c). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of five witnesses and six exhibits consisting of documentary evidence.Appeal No. 2108Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/29/19776/29/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2226 - DAVISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the SS DELTA NORTE under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 6 August 1979, Appellant wilfully disobeyed a lawful order given him by the Chief Mate; to wit, he failed to complete stripping the vessel's logbook before going ashore. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 3 October 1979, 7 November 1979, and 6 December 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of the Chief Mate of the SS DELTA NORTE and two pieces of documentary evidence: (a) certified extract from Shipping Articles of SS DELTA NORTE (10 ex 2), (b) a copy of logbook entry of SS DELTA NORTE (10 ex 4). In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and a letter from Baker-Lyman Co., Inc. dated 15 October 1979.Appeal No. 2226Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/29/19807/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2210 - HARRISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 February 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, on 10 January 1979, suspended the captioned documents for a period of one month on probation for a period of six months upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard BERING SEAL, under authority of the captioned documents, did, from on or about 1 December to 22 December 1978, wrongfully operate the vessel without the complement of crew required by the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, in that he did not have the required number of able seamen aboard. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and four documents. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of a witness and testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2210Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19805/20/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2154 - MCKEEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 March 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, after hearing held at Valdez, Alaska, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master of the United States SS AMERICA SUN under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 8 December 1977, Appellant did, while the vessel "was departing the Port of Valdez, Alaska, wrongfully fail to obey an order regarding said vessel's speed issued by competent authority, to wit, the Captain of the Port, Prince William Sound, Alaska, which was issued by verbal direction of the Vessel Traffic Center." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. After hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 2154Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/11/19805/11/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2123 - ARNOLDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's license for four months on ten months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the United States towing vessel TECUMSEH, O.N. 258 916 under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 5 August 1976, Appellant allowed the towing bridle between his vessel and the barge SKIPANON to go slack and drag on the bottom of the Coos River in a submarine cable area causing the submarine cable to be broken. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification found proved. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the sworn testimony of Mssrs. Don Dillon, Dennis Reynolds, Homer Blakeney, Steven Johnson, Orville Fuller, and Peter Busick, and the following documents: Affidavit of Service of the Charge; U.S. Army Engineer District, Portland; "Coos Bay, Oregon 35' Channel Modification General Plan"; U.S. Army Engineer District, Portland; "Coos Bay, Oregon 35' Channel Modification Coos Bay and Empire Ranges"; Statement of Steven Phillip Johnson of 28 January 1977.Appeal No. 2123Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/14/19786/14/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2205 - ROBLESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 September 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's documents for two months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 5 June 1978, Appellant made a false statement of material fact, under oath, in his application for a raise in grade of his license, filed at Portland, Maine, when he stated he had not made application in any other port and been denied a raise in grade within the previous year when in fact he had applied and been denied a raise in grade at Jacksonville, Florida, on 1 June 1978. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine, from 6 July to 24 July 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and six exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of two months on twelve months' probation. The entire decision was served on 15 September 1978. Appeal was timely filed and perfected.Appeal No. 2205Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/12/19805/12/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2056 - JOHNSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 7 August 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Radio Officer on board the United States SS PACIFIC BEAR under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 22 November 1974, Appellant disobeyed a lawful order of the Master to check for radio traffic from Nagasaki, Japan. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of the ship's master and a consultant to the ship's owner, the ship's log and other documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony plus documentary and character evidence.Appeal No. 2056Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/1/19764/1/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2063 - CORNELIUSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 7 January 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 3 December 1975, Appellant (1) wrongfully failed to appear before the Investigating Officer at the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office, San Diego, California, pursuant to a subpoena issued on 26 November 1975 in the matter of license number 112 067 issued to Lewis F. Burk, and (2) wrongfully failed to appear before the Investigating Officer at the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Officer, San Diego, California, pursuant to a subpoena issued on 26 November 1975 in the matter of license number 111 246 issued to Ralph Madruga. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2063Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/14/19767/14/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2163 - WITTICHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 7 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, after a hearing at Jacksonville, Florida, on 30 May 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of 6 months on probation for a period of 12 months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as second assistant engineer aboard CAROLE G. INGRAM, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on or about 25 May 1978, while in the service of CAROLE G. INGRAM and while on board the INGRAM's tow, the barge IOS 3302, which was at anchor in the St. John's River, Jacksonville, Florida, wrongfully assault and batter by paushing down onto the sand locker of said barge, a member of the crew. to wit AB Armando RODRIGUEZ. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and seven documents. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence his own testimony.Appeal No. 2163Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19799/6/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2101 - KELLOGGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 April 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's licenses for 3 months outright plus 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master on board the United States SS EDGAR M. QUEENY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 31 January 1975, Appellant did not have "a competent person standing by in position to let the anchor go promptly as the vessel was maneuvering in congested waters," and that Appellant did "wrongfully fail to take positive action in sufficient time to prevent a collision with the SS CORINTHOS." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2101Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2088 - SORIANOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 July 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle Washington suspended Appellant's license no. 442 203 for six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of violation of a statute. The specification found proved alleges that as President of Swiftsure, Inc., owner of M/V MARLIN, O.N. 568 721, an uninspected vessel, on or about 24 January 1976, Appellant specifically directed the master of said vessel to get underway from Seattle, Washington, wrongfully carrying freight for hire in willful violation of 46 U.S.C. 367 and 404. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence with the approval of Appellant and his counsel a stipulation of fact (T-7). See CG Exhibit 1.Appeal No. 2088Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19771/3/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2094 - MILLERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 May, 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as pilot on board the Norwegian SS BAUNE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 18 January 1974, Appellant committed several faults which led to a collision at Mile 6 AHP, Mississippi River, with SS KEY TRADER. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. A voluminous record of testimony, statements and exhibits was complied by the parties.Appeal No. 2094Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/7/19772/7/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2232 - MILLERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 November 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license outright for a period of six (6) months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The one specification of negligence found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Chief Engineer aboard SS LURLINE, under authority of his license, on or about 22 December 1977, failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the overfilling of fuel oil tanks and subsequent spilling of a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2232Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2221 - CERCYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 September 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator on board Motor Vessel TIGER STAR under authority of the license above captioned, on 4 August 1978, Appellant negligently fell asleep at the wheel, thereby contributing to a collision between TIGER STAR and a fixed platform. A second charge of misconduct was withdrawn at the outset of the proceeding. The hearing was held at New Orleans on 15, 22 and 29 August, and 8 September 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty of the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2221Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19806/12/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2035 - KROHNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 April 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for two months outright plus three months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the SS MARINE FLORIDIAN under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 20 January 1973, did wrongfully fail to navigate said vessel in compliance with Rule 19 and Rule 22 of the International Rules of the Road, while serving as the officer in charge of navigating said vessel. At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on Appellant's behalf by the Administrative Law Judge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence his own testimony and documentary evidence consisting of sixteen exhibits.Appeal No. 2035Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/19/19759/19/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2084 - WARRENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 February 1976 an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 8 months outright plus 4 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Second Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS AMERICAN LEADER under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 21 July 1975, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a fellow crewmember. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence three exhibits and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2084Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197611/9/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2040 - RAMIREZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for six months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an oiler on board the SS HAWAIIAN LEGISLATOR under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 28 October 1974, Appellant did. FIRST, wrongfully Assault and Batter by beating a member of the crew, namely, 3rd Assistant Engineer Gilbert D. Quinn, and. SECOND, wrongfully fail to perform his assigned duties by reason of intoxication. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications.Appeal No. 2040Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/17/197510/17/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2054 - LEESEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 July 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for three months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Operator on board F/V AMERICA, under authority of the license aboved captioned, on or about 23 February 1975, Appellant, while the vessel was in Berkeley Marina, Berkeley, California, failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the spilling of a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. An additional charge of misconduct, specifying that Appellant violated section 311(b) (3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendment of 1972 in permitting a harmful quantity of oil to be discharged into the navigable waters of the United States, was dismissed as "duplicitous and unnecessary" by the Administrative Law Judge. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2054Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/22/19764/22/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2189 - BEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 July 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, revoked Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving under the authority of his document aboard USNS MISPILLION on or about 4 September 1977, while on U.S. Naval Base, Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines, Appellant did have in his possession a narcotic drug, to wit: heroin. At the hearing, which comprised nine sessions, Appellant was at first represented by lay counsel but later retained professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence nineteen exhibits. Appellant submitted no defense.Appeal No. 2189Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/25/19803/25/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2185 - JONESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 May 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, after a Hearing conducted at San Francisco, California, and New Orleans, Louisiana, on various dates between 17 January 1977 and 5 January 1978, suspended Appellant's document for a period of six months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The four specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as QMED aboard SS DELTA MAR, under authority of the captioned document did, on or about 26 October 1976, while said vessel was at sea: (1) wrongfully assault and batter by beating a member of the crew, Eugene Kyzar; (2) wrongfully assault and batter with a portable radio the vessel's Master, Peter J. Bourgeois; (3) wrongfully use foul and abusive language against the vessel's Master, Peter J.Bourgeois; and (4) wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the vessel's Master, Peter J. Bourgeois, in that Appellant failed to stop using obscene and profane language against said vessel's Master. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses, ten documents, three photographs, one item of physical evidence, and four depositions. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses, his own included, and two documents.Appeal No. 2185Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19802/22/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2106 - CARDWELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's license and other seaman's documents for two months subject to six months probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator and Person-in-Charge on board the M/V THOMAS C.L. NUGENT under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 August 1976, Appellant wrongfully permitted the discharge of oily bilge slops from that vessel in the navigable waters of the United States, to wit, the Ohio River near Mile 572.0, causing a sheen upon the water's surface, a violation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public Law 92-500 (86 Stat. 816). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2106Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/12/19779/12/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2222 - FIOCCAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 October 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The six specifications of misconduct found proved allege that while serving as Boatswain on board SS MORMACWAVE under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) on or about 11 January 1979, failed to perform his duties; (2) on 12 January 1979, failed to perform his regularly assigned duties by being absent from the vessel from 0800 to 1200 and from 1300 to 1700 without sufficient cause; (3) on 22 January 1979, failed to perform his duties in that he was absent from the vessel 0830 to 1200 and from 1300 to 1700 without proper permission; (4) on 23 January 1979, failed to perform his regularly assigned duties from 0800 to 1200 and from 1300 to 1700 without proper permission; (5) on 24 January 1979, failed to obey a lawful order in that when asked by the Master if he would obey orders, he indicated to the master that he would not obey orders; and (6) on 24 January 1979, failed to obey a lawful order of the Chief Mate in that when ordered to appear before the Master to have a log entry read to him, he refused and sent the Chief Mate a note which said, "Drop Dead. the X Bosin."Appeal No. 2222Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/21/19807/21/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2201 - BROADNAXThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order rendered 12 January 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleged that while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 30 November 1972, Appellant was convicted by the Superior Court, State of California, In and for the County of Stanislaus, a court of record, for violation of Section 11500 of the California Health and Safety Code, a narcotic drug law violation. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on II January 1979. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence one composite exhibit. Appellant offered no evidence in defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 18 January 1979. Appeal was timely filed on 8 February 1979 and perfected on the same day.Appeal No. 2201Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/28/19804/28/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2128 - HOLLINGSWORTHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order rendered on 15 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a third pantryman on board the SS President Fillmore under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 May 1977, appellant did "wrongfully create a disturbance aboard said vessel by yelling and addressing foul and abusive language to a fellow crewmember, J. B. ALLEN." At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and no exhibits. At the end of the hearing, the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order of admonition on Appellant.Appeal No. 2128Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/27/19787/27/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2023 - KOBERGERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1 (now 5.30-1). By order dated 11 January 1974, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman document for four months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Steward on board the United States SS AMERICAN CHIEFTAIN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 15 September 1973, Appellant did assault first Assistant Engineer Joseph Urei, Z-518662-D1, in the Officer' Pantry. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the vessel's log entry concerning the incident and the testimony of four witnesses.Appeal No. 2023Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19756/3/197512/21/2017
Page 19 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.