CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2009 - NORSWORTHYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 15 March 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Toledo, Ohio, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that while holding the document above captioned, on or about 6 December 1973, Appellant was convicted by the County Court, Door County Wisconsin, a court of record, for violation of narcotic drug laws of the State of Wisconsin. At the hearing Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. In mitigation, Appellant stated that he had been in a bar and had run out of cigarettes and that a woman gave him a pack of cigarettes containing two marijuana cigarettes. At the end of the hearing, the Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents, issued to Appellant. The entire decision and order was served on 6 April 1974. Appeal was timely filed on 15 April 1974.Appeal No. 2009Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19749/20/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2011 - GIMBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 25 September 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month outright plus two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board the McAllister Barge 100 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 22 August 1973, Appellant negligently failed to supervise cargo discharge operations while the barge was bunkering the M/V AEGEAN WAVE, thereby contributing to a spillage of cargo from said barge's discharge hose into the waters of Hampton Roads, Norfolk, Virginia. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a report of pollution violation and the testimony of a witness.Appeal No. 2011Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/30/19749/30/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2012 - HERRINGTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 23 January 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator aboard the M/V HARDHEAD under the authority of the license above captioned, on or about 20 September 1973, Appellant wrongfully failed to come to a timely passing agreement while said vessel was navigating the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at approximately Mile 14.5, west of Harvey Locks. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses, a deckhand on duty aboard the M/V HARDHEAD at the time of the incident and the master of the M/V SEA ISLANDER.Appeal No. 2012Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/8/197410/8/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2013 - BRITTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 13 November 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas suspended Appellant's license for three months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the United States SS GULFSEAL under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 2 July 1973, Appellant did, not at approximately 1320, permit two barrels of lube oil to overflow No. 5 port cargo tank and enter the Taylor's Bayou Turning Basin. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence testimony of two live witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.Appeal No. 2013Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/13/197412/13/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2014 - CANNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1973, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month outright plus four months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as chief Mate on board the SS VALLEY FORGE under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 11 August 1973, Appellant did wrongfully cause a spill of approximately one barrel of lube oil into the navigable waters of the United States, Houston Ship Channel, at Shell Oil Terminal, Deer Park, Texas. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence an affidavit of service, certification of shipping articles, the loading orders of the vessel and the testimony of five (5) witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.Appeal No. 2014Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/30/197412/30/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2015 - BARNESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 14 August 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Memphis, Tennessee revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that while holding the above captioned merchant mariner's document, on or about 28 September 1970, Appellant was convicted by the Court of Calcasieu Parish, Lake Charles, Louisiana, for violation of the narcotic drug laws of the state of Louisiana. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a Certificate of Service of the charge and specification, and a certified copy of the conviction by Calcasieu Parish Court. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of Paul N. Fanolis and his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specificationAppeal No. 2015Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/10/19752/10/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2016 - AGOSTINIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 2 April 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the MV CAPTAIN SAM under authority of the license above captioned, on 13 November 1972, Appellant wrongfully failed to keep his vessel on the right side of the channel in the East River, New York, near Hell Gate, thereby contributing to a collision between the MV CAPTAIN SAM and a scow in tow of the tug BRONX 4. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and certain documents.Appeal No. 2016Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/3/19753/3/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2018 - GOODWINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, (now 5.30-1). By order dated 17 July 1974, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's license for 3 months outright plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V PIONEER under authority of the license above captioned, did from 28 April 1974 through 26 June 1974 wrongfully operate said vessel on forty-one occasions without a valid Certificate of Inspection. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a copy of the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, an Amendment to the Certificate of Inspection and a Temporary Certificate of Inspection.Appeal No. 2018Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/10/19753/10/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2017 - TROCHEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved allege that while serving as an oiler on board the United States SS ELIZABETHPORT under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 18 May 1973, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a knife, a member of the crew, Pedreu C. Lewis, while said vessel was at sea. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence shipping articles, entries from the official logbook, and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2017Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/11/19753/11/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2019 - JONESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 8 February 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months outright plus three months on nine months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS HURRICANE under authority of the document above-captioned, on or about 24 January 1974, Appellant, while the vessel was underway in the Houston Ship Channel, did wrongfully assault and batter a member of the crew, Jimmy Garner. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and certain documentary evidence. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and that of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2019Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/11/19753/11/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2020 - JOYNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 22 July 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Tankerman on board the T/B OCEAN 80 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 25 October 1972, Appellant, while said vessel was moored in Carteret, New Jersey, was negligent in his duties in that, during cargo transfer operations, he left the said vessel unsupervised for a period in excess of 30 minutes. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the sworn testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2020Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/7/19754/7/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2021 - BURKEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 August 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him incompetent. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a second mate on board SS MISSOURI under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 3 November 1973, Appellant was, and at the time of hearing was still, mentally incompetent to perform the duties for which he held the license and documents issued by the Coast Guard. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records, the testimony of witnesses, given both in person and by deposition, and certain medical records.Appeal No. 2021Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/7/19755/7/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2022 - PALMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 6 May 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Third Mate on board the T/B IOS 3301 under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 19 February 1974, Appellant did wrongfully cause an oil spill into the navigable waters of the United States, the Houston Ship Channel, while said vessel was moored at Houston, Texas. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence a vessel inspection report and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2022Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/16/19755/16/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2023 - KOBERGERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1 (now 5.30-1). By order dated 11 January 1974, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman document for four months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Steward on board the United States SS AMERICAN CHIEFTAIN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 15 September 1973, Appellant did assault first Assistant Engineer Joseph Urei, Z-518662-D1, in the Officer' Pantry. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the vessel's log entry concerning the incident and the testimony of four witnesses.Appeal No. 2023Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19756/3/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2024 - KENNEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 8 October 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on 18 month's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the M/V VINEYARD QUEEN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 20 August 1974, Appellant did fail to determine the position of the vessel, thereby contributing to a grounding. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a chart, other documents, and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and affidavits concerning the operation of a foghorn.Appeal No. 2024Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19756/4/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2025 - ARMSTRONGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulation 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 12 September 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for one month on three months' probation and revoked his operator's license outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that, on or about 11 1973, Appellant wrongfully, knowingly, and fraudulently submitted and signed a false application for an original towboat operator's license at the USCG Marine Safety Office, Norfolk, Virginia, to wit: Appellant indicated on said application that he never had been convicted by any court including a military court, for any offense other than a minor traffic violation when in fact he had a past history of several major criminal convictions before different state courts. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2025Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19756/5/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2027 - WALKERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 13 November 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for three months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the M/V GLENDA S under authority of the license above described, on or about 13 August 1974, Appellant did wrongfully fail to navigate with due caution thus contributing to the collision between said vessel and tow and the Borden Chemical Docks at Geismar, Louisiana, Mile 184.8, Lower Mississippi River. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2027Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/26/19756/26/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2028 - CARTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 12 September 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license and seaman documents for 9 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a THIRD MATE on board the SS ST. LOUIS under authority of the document and license above captioned, Appellant did, FIRST on or about 7 November 1973 while said vessel was in the port of Singapore, wrongfully fail to perform his duties due to intoxication; SECOND, on or about 18 November 1973, while said vessel was in the port of Hong Kong, wrongfully fail to perform his duties due to intoxication. THIRD, on or about 19 November 1973, while said vessel was in the port of Hong Kong, wrongfully fail to obey an order of the Master by being under the influence of alcohol while on watch. FOURTH, on or about 19 November 1973, while said vessel was in the port of Hong Kong, wrongfully fail to perform his duties due to intoxication.Appeal No. 2028Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/27/19756/27/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2029 - CHAPMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 13 August 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an Operator on board the M/V ELLENA HICKS, under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did, on or about 30 December 1973, FIRST, wrongfully fail to post a proper lookout during low visibility, thereby contributing to a collision between his tow, the barge THELMA COLLINS, and the M/V NISSAN MARU, and SECOND, wrongfully fail to sound fog signals during low visibility, thereby contributing to a collision between his tow, the barge THELMA COLLINS, and the M/V NISSAN MARU.Appeal No. 2029Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/31/19757/31/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2030 - RIVERAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 30 December 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Pilot on board the SS DELAWARE GETTY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 29 August 1973, Appellant (1) Did imprudently navigate said vessel into Army Terminal Channel, Bahia de San Juan, Puerto Rico, under adverse conditions of trim and wind; and did fail to maintain control of said vessel which resulted in grounding; and (2) Did neglect and fail to navigate said vessel in a prudent manner which resulted in the sinking of Army Terminal Channel Light Buoy No. 6.Appeal No. 2030Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/21/19758/21/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2031 - CANNONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order 23 October 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for two months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the M/V ATCHISON, under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 20 August 1974, Appellant while said vessel was upbound on the Mississippi River in the vicinity of the Luling to Destrehan ferry crossing (1) did wrongfully fail to yield the right of way to the M/V GEORGE PRINCE which was crossing from his starboard side, thereby contributing to a collision with the M/V GEORGE PRINCE; and (2) did wrongfully fail to screen the sidelights on the lead barge of the tow as required by the applicable Rules of the Road. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the sworn testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2031Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/5/19759/5/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2032 - KAYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 31 October 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for two months outright plus four months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Chief Mate on board the United States SS TRANSHURON under authority of the license and document above captioned, on or about 3 February 1974, Appellant wrongfully deserted the said vessel at the port of Honolulu, Hawaii. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence various documents including the vessel's log entry concerning the incident, and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2032Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/15/19759/15/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2033 - NEVESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 19 December 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months outright plus six months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of the charge of violation of a statute (46 U.S.C. 224a). The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the Fishing Vessel CONSTITUTION under authority of the license above captioned, from on or about 29 October 1973, to on or about 4 December 1973, Appellant did willfully employ of engage to perform the duties of mate aboard CONSTITUTION, a fishing vessel of 465.92 gross tons, a person or persons not licensed to perform such duties, in violation of 46 U.S.C. 224a, for a fishing voyage on the high seas that began in Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico, and terminated in San Diego, California.Appeal No. 2033Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/16/19759/16/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2034 - BUFFINGTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 21 November 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as a Master on board the United States S/S SABINE under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 17 August 1973, Appellant: (i) departed Bridgeport, Connecticut, on a foreign voyage to Punta Cardon, Venezuela, without signing Shipping Articles before a U.S. Shipping Commissioner to ship in foreign trade. (ii) while serving as Master on this voyage, from 20-26 August, failed to maintain an official logbook.Appeal No. 2034Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/16/19759/16/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2035 - KROHNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 April 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for two months outright plus three months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the SS MARINE FLORIDIAN under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 20 January 1973, did wrongfully fail to navigate said vessel in compliance with Rule 19 and Rule 22 of the International Rules of the Road, while serving as the officer in charge of navigating said vessel. At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on Appellant's behalf by the Administrative Law Judge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence his own testimony and documentary evidence consisting of sixteen exhibits.Appeal No. 2035Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/19/19759/19/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2036 - SCHMIDTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1 and 3. By order dated 28 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Maine, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the captioned document on or about 16 January 1969, Appellant was convicted of a violation of Chapter 94 Section 205 of the General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the Third District Court of Eastern Middlesex, a Court of Record, for "violation of narcotic drug law (illegal possession of marijuana)."Appeal No. 2036Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/22/19759/22/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2037 - SABOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30, now 5.30. By order dated 8 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an A.B. on board the United States SS FREDERICK LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant; (1) did on or about 24 September 1974, while said vessel was in the port of Malili, Indonesia, wrongfully have intoxicating liquor in his possession; (2) did on or about 7 October 1974, while said vessel was in the Port of Bangkok, Thailand, wrongfully fail to perform his duties;Appeal No. 2037Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/23/19759/23/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2038 - METCALFEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 25 April 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS SAN ANTONIO under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 23 April 1975, Appellant did wrongfully commit assault and battery on a member of the crew, Joseph M. Kelly. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel, with some assistance from the Beaumont-Port Arthur National Maritime Union Port Agent, Joseph Patton, and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of one witness and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2038Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/30/19759/30/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2039 - DIETZEThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 15 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as pilot on board M/V ANCO PRINCESS being the holder of the license above captioned, on or about 24 September 1974, Appellant, while navigating said vessel upbound on the Misissippi River and meeting a downbound vessel and tow at approximately mile 4 AHP, (1) wrongfully failed to execute a port-to-port passing in accordance with Article 18, Inland Rules of the Road, thereby contributing to the collision between said vessel and the tow of the M/V LIBBY BLACK, and (2) wrongfully failed to sound whistle signals in accordance with Article 18, Inland Rules of the Road. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2039Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/8/197510/8/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2040 - RAMIREZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for six months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an oiler on board the SS HAWAIIAN LEGISLATOR under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 28 October 1974, Appellant did. FIRST, wrongfully Assault and Batter by beating a member of the crew, namely, 3rd Assistant Engineer Gilbert D. Quinn, and. SECOND, wrongfully fail to perform his assigned duties by reason of intoxication. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications.Appeal No. 2040Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/17/197510/17/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2041 - SISKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 May 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for the three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification as found proved alleges that while serving as operator of the towboat M/V JOSEPH M. JONES, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 26 February 1975, Appellant negligently overtook the M/V T.M. NORSWORTHY and tow and negligently attempted at Mile 636, Ohio River to pass it under circumstances involving risk of collision and without the assent or knowledge of the Pilot of the T.M. NORSWORTHY, which was then engaged in a difficult and dangerous flanking maneuver to round a bend under conditions of very high water and strong currents. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specificationAppeal No. 2041Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/29/197510/29/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2042 - KELLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 October 1974, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Chief Engineer on board the SS JOHN B. WATERMAN, while the vessel was at sea, under authority of the document and license above captioned, Appellant did: (1) on 10 February 1974, at about 0800, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the Master in that he failed to report to the Master's office to be logged, (2) on 10 February 1974, at about 0735, use abusive language toward the Master, (3) on 10 February 1974, at about 1300, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the master in that he failed to report to the master's office to be logged, (4) on 4 April 1974, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the master in that he failed to have the engine watchstander's quarters soogeed, and (5) on 4 April 1974, use abusive language toward the master.Appeal No. 2042Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/29/197511/29/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2043 - FISHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 October 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for two months on twenty four months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board M/V GOODTIME under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 4 August 1974, Appellant negligently operated the vessel so as to endanger an eighteen foot glastron boat, owned and operated by Ray E. PARKER, while in the vicinity of Swett Point on the Sasanoa River, in that he passed in a meeting situation at such a speed as to cause an excessive wake. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2043Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/197512/10/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2044 - ZOLEZZIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order and decision dated 27 June 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license and all other merchant mariner's documents for three months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of the charge of "violation of a statute." The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the F/V MARY ANTOINETTE, O/N 523763, a vessel of over 200 gross tons, under authority of the license above captioned, from 15 April 1975 to 16 May 1975, Appellant did willfully employ or engage to perform the duties of mate aboard that vessel, a person or persons not licensed to perform such duties in violation of 46 U.S.C. 224a, for a fishing voyage on the high seas which began in Acajutla, El Salvador on 15 April 1975 and terminated on 16 May 1975 in San Diego, California.Appeal No. 2044Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/22/197512/22/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2045 - ROWLANDBy order dated 5 September 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license for one (1) month outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleges that while serving as pilot on board the SS JAMES LYKES, being the holder of the license above captioned, on or about 23 December 1973, Appellant (1) negligently attempted to overtake and pass the privileged M/V MARY FREDEMAN and tow, tank barges GDM 50 and GDM 60, without assent of M/V MARY FREDEMAN, thereby causing a collision between SS JAMES LYKES and GDM 60 in the houston Ship Channel near Shell Oil Terminal and (2) neglected to take the necessary precaution required by the ordinary practice of seamen, thereby contributing to the cause of a collision. A third specification of negligence, alleging that Appellant contributed to the cause of an oil spill into the navigable waters of the United States, was found by the Administrative Law Judge to have merged with the first two specifications since "there was no additional act of negligence by Respondent."Appeal No. 2045Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/24/197512/24/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2046 - HARDENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United State Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 February 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator of the towboat M/V POLLIWOG under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 22 September 1974, Appellant failed to take proper precautions to avoid a collision while navigating at about mile 764.4, Upper Mississippi River. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of several witnesses and certain documents. In defense, Appellant submitted the case on the record made by the Investigating Officer and entered a pamphlet published by Commander, Second Coast Guard District, giving advise to recreational boat owners and operators.Appeal No. 2046Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/23/19761/23/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2047 - VALLADARESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 April 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for nine months outright plus three months on 15 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a fireman on board the United States SS SAN JUAN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 September 1973, at Port Elizabeth, New Jersey, Appellant: (1) assaulted and battered one Robert Hyer, a crewmember of the vessel; (2) assaulted and battered one James R. Wilson, a crewmember of the vessel; and (3) assaulted and battered one Stephen Bertrand, second officer of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Since Appellant himself did not appear, the Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2047Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/3/19762/3/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2048 - NORTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1 and 3. By order dated 4 June 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's document and license upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, being the holder of the above captioned document and license, was, on or about 4 March 1975, convicted by the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, a court of record, for possession of hashish in violation of narcotic drug laws of the United States, to wit: the Revised Code of Washington section 69.50.401 (d) and sections 7 and 13 of title 18 of the United States Code. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a copy of the record of Appellant's conviction. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence a statement in mitigation.Appeal No. 2048Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/1/19763/1/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2049 - OWENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 21 April 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 6 months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the M/V MAMA LERE under authority of the licenses above captioned, on or about 29 January 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully failed to maintain a proper lookout while navigating during a period of reduced visibility, thereby contributing to a collision between the M/V MAMA LERE and the SS AMERICAN WHEAT and (2) wrongfully failed to sound proper fog signals during a period of reduced visibility.Appeal No. 2049Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/8/19763/8/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2050 - WIJNGAARDEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 May 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Electrician on board the SS SHIRLEY LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant did FIRST, on or about 15 August 1974, wrongfully fail to perform his duties while in a foreign port; SECOND, on or about 29 August 1974, while in a foreign port, wrongfully assault with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a knife, a member of the crew, Luis Cortes; THIRD, on or about 29 August 1974, while in a foreign port, wrongfully assault a member of the crew, Willie Lewis.Appeal No. 2050Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/18/19763/18/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2051 - DESVAUXThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 February 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month outright plus four months on fifteen months' probation upon finding her guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as rooms messman and crew messman on board SS YOUNG AMERICA under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) and (2) on 27 July 1974 wrongfully showed disrespect to the Master of the vessel by means of letters addressed to him; (3) on 31 July 1974 wrongfully addressed the Chief Officer with profane and disrespectful language; (4) on 28 July 1974, acted in a disrespectful manner to the Radio Officer through words and gestures; and (5) on 31 July 1974, assaulted and battered the radio officer by striking him with her hands.Appeal No. 2051Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/19/19763/19/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2052 - NELSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 December 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three (3) months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. Under the charge of negligence the specifications found proved allege that while serving as pilot aboard the M/V GEORGE PRINCE under the authority of the license above captioned, on 4 February 1974 Appellant wrongfully failed to (1) keep out of the way of a privileged vessel in a crossing situation, (2) timely slacken speed, stop, or reverse to avoid collision with a privileged vessel in a crossing situation, (3) keep a proper lookout, and (4) adequately utilize electronic navigational equipment available to him for the purpose of effecting a safe passage across the Mississippi River at about mile 120.7 above Head of Passes, all of which contributed to a collision between the M/V GEORGE PRINCE and the M/V F. R. BIGELOW and tow. Under the charge of misconduct the specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot aboard the M/V GEORGE PRINCE under the authority of the license above captioned, on 4 February 1974 Appellant wrongfully failed to sound a one whistle signal as required by 33 U.S.C. 344, while in a condition covered by that section. A second specification under the charge of misconduct, alleging that Appellant failed to sound the danger signal as required by 33 U.S.C. 344, was found not proved by the Administrative Law Judge.Appeal No. 2052Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/22/19763/22/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2056 - JOHNSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 7 August 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Radio Officer on board the United States SS PACIFIC BEAR under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 22 November 1974, Appellant disobeyed a lawful order of the Master to check for radio traffic from Nagasaki, Japan. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of the ship's master and a consultant to the ship's owner, the ship's log and other documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony plus documentary and character evidence.Appeal No. 2056Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/1/19764/1/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2053 - STEPHENSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 October 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as able bodied seaman on board the M/V PRESQUE ISLE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 26 June 1975, Appellant was wrongfully absent from his vessel and duties, assaulted and battered the master on two separate occasions, and disobeyed a lawful order of the master on two separate occasions. As the hearing was held in absentia, the Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the oral testimony of two witnesses, and affidavit of service, and pertinent extracts form the vessel's logbook and articles of agreement.Appeal No. 2053Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/21/19764/21/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2054 - LEESEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 July 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for three months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Operator on board F/V AMERICA, under authority of the license aboved captioned, on or about 23 February 1975, Appellant, while the vessel was in Berkeley Marina, Berkeley, California, failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the spilling of a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. An additional charge of misconduct, specifying that Appellant violated section 311(b) (3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendment of 1972 in permitting a harmful quantity of oil to be discharged into the navigable waters of the United States, was dismissed as "duplicitous and unnecessary" by the Administrative Law Judge. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2054Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/22/19764/22/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2055 - MILLERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 October 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Diego, California, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specifications found proved alleges that on or about 21 July 1971, Appellant was convicted in Superior Court in the County of San Diego for a violation of California Health and Safety Code, section 11530.5 (possession of marijuana for sale). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the certified duly attested abstract of the court record, criminal minutes of the Superior Court of the State of California, probation order, and order remanding Appellant to the custody of the sheriff.Appeal No. 2055Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/23/19764/23/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2057 - SHIPPThis appeal had been taken is accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 October 1974, as amended by the supplemental order of 2 December 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for two months outright plus three months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an operator on board the United States M/V J.F. LAMB under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 July 1974, Appellant neglected to take the necessary precautions required by the practice of seamen (Article 29, Inland Rules of the Road), to wit: navigating the tug and its laden tow outside the navigable waters of the Bayport Channel, Galveston Bay, Texas, resulting in a collision with a submerged object and subsequent sinking of the tank barge TM-10, and that Appellant negligently caused a spill of No. 6 fuel oil into the navigable waters of the United States, Bayport Channel, Galveston Bay, Texas.Appeal No. 2057Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/3/19765/3/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2058 - SEARSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1 and 3 By order dated 21 October 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman documents for three months plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an operator on board the uninspected towing vessel MAUREEN MORAN under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 20 September 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully absented himself from the wheelhouse for a period of approximately 15 minutes, leaving the responsibilities of navigation of the vessel and its tow to an unlicensed deckhand, thereby contributing to a collision between the tow and a pier, and (2) failed to post a proper lookout, notwithstanding the fact that the vessel was being navigated from the lower wheelhouse and the light barge in tow alongside to port partially obstructed vision from the wheelhouse on the port side, thereby contributing to the collision. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification of misconduct and not guilty to the charge and specification of negligence.Appeal No. 2058Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/10/19765/10/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2059 - LESKINENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 November 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after a hearing at Detroit, Michigan, on 25 February 1975, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The single specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master of M/V H. LEE WHITE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 11 December 1974, Appellant, while directing the navigation of that vessel upbound in restricted waters, wrongfully failed to navigate the vessel with caution; notwithstanding the fact that information of the proximity and approach of another vessel was available to him (from radar observations) thereby contributing to a collision between his vessel and M/V GEORGIOS A while that vessel was downbound in the St. Clair River. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2059Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/2/19766/2/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2026 - CLARKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 March 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a bedroom utility (OBR) on board the United States SS PIONEER CONTRACTOR under authority of the document above captioned, between 7 December 1972 and 28 February 1973, Appellant was wrongfully a user of a narcotic drug. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing and after the Administrative Law Judge questioned the Investigating Officer concerning the circumstances surrounding service of charges and notice of the hearing a motion to proceed in absentia was granted. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to all charges and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and a certification of the applicable shipping articles.Appeal No. 2026Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19756/5/197612/21/2017
Page 10 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.