| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V OLEAN - 59 MJ 561 | UNITED STATES V OLEAN - 59 MJ 561
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 1107 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 2/8/2002 | 2/8/2002 | | 9/15/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V ONTIVEROS - 59 MJ 639 | Appellant was tried by general court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, he was found guilty of one specification of conspiracy to steal and wrongfully dispose of military property of the United States of a value greater than $100, in violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of wrongful disposition of military property of the United States of a value greater than $100, in violation of Article 108, UCMJ; and one specification of larceny of military property of the United States of a value greater than $100, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ. The judge sentenced Appellant to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for six months, and reduction to E-3. The Convening Authority approved the adjudged sentence, which was within the sentence limits of the pretrial agreement. | Docket No. 1178 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/25/2003 | 11/25/2003 | | 10/5/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V ORTEGA - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V ORTEGA - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 1395 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 1/20/2016 | 1/20/2016 | | 9/1/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V OSUNA - 56 MJ 620 | UNITED STATES V OSUNA - 56 MJ 620
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 1122 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/28/2001 | 10/28/2001 | | 8/31/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V OSUNA - 58 MJ 879 | The record in this case was first acted upon by this Court on 28 November 2001 in a decision which affirmed the findings of guilty, and returned the record for a new convening authority’s action on the sentence. That sentence action has been completed by the convening authority, and has resulted in his reducing the earlier approved dishonorable discharge to a bad conduct discharge, and approval again of the remaining adjudged sentence of confinement for three months and reduction to paygrade E-1. Before this Court, Appellant has reasserted an error assigned by him earlier, that the evidence of record is insufficient to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for two specifications alleging maltreatment of a Seaman Apprentice (SA) under his authority as an Honor Guard trainee.2 This assignment was rejected by two of the three judges on this panel during our first review of the case, with a determination that the findings of guilty were both legally and factually sufficient. As the third member of the panel, I dissented from this view, finding the two specifications of maltreatment not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Now, Appellant asks us to revisit the majority’s decision in this regard. In so doing, he notes that the question of what extent a service court is bound by its previous factual findings is presently pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in the case of United States v. Riley, 57 M.J. 157 (C.A.A.F. 2002). | Docket No. 1122 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 4/9/2003 | 4/9/2003 | | 10/5/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V OUIMETTE - 52 MJ 691 | UNITED STATES V OUIMETTE - 52 MJ 691 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeal Decision | Docket No. 1117 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 2/10/2000 | 2/10/2000 | | 8/30/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V OWENS - UNPUBLISHED | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of conspiracy to commit larceny, in violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and one specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for forty-five days, reduction to E-3, and a bad-conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged. The pretrial agreement did not affect the sentence. | Docket No. 1333 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 8/13/2010 | 8/13/2010 | | 10/30/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V PADGETT - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V PADGETT - UNPUBLISHED - CGCCA Opinion | Docket No. 1060 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 4/22/1999 | 4/22/1999 | | 8/29/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V PAJEAUD - 63 MJ 644 | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of failure to go by not reporting to PSU 308 in Gulfport, Mississippi, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of missing movement, in violation of Article 87, UCMJ; and one specification of making a false official statement, in violation of Article 107, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for six months, and reduction to E-1. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged but suspended all confinement in excess of 180 days for twelve months from the date of the Convening Authority’s action, pursuant to the terms of the pretrial agreement. | Docket No. 1227 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 6/29/2006 | 6/29/2006 | | 10/25/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V PARADA - 54 MJ 730 | UNITED STATES V PARADA - 54 MJ 730 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 1100 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 1/18/2001 | 1/18/2001 | | 8/31/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V PARMLEY - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V PARMLEY - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Opinion | Docket No. 1443 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 8/7/2017 | 8/7/2017 | | 9/1/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V PERRON - 53 MJ 774 | UNITED STATES V PERRON - 53 MJ 774 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeal Decision | Docket No. 1115 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 8/28/2000 | 8/28/2000 | | 8/30/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V PERRON - 56 MJ 582 | UNITED STATES V PERRON - 56 MJ 582
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 1115 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/1/2001 | 10/1/2001 | | 8/31/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | United States V PETERS (UNPUBLISHED) | United States V PETERS (UNPUBLISHED)
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Opinion | Docket No. 1369 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 6/4/2013 | 6/4/2013 | | 9/18/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V PETERSON PER CURIAM | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of the following offenses: six specifications of unauthorized absence, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of wrongful use of methamphetamine, a controlled substance, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ; and one specification of larceny of property of a value of about nine dollars, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for seventy-five days, and reduction to E-1. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged, but suspended confinement in excess of sixty days for the period of confinement plus twelve months from the date of Appellant’s release from confinement, which met the terms of the pretrial agreement. The Convening Authority noted that Appellant had spent forty-six days in pretrial confinement, and that his sentence would be credited accordingly. | Docket No. 1244 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/8/2005 | 11/8/2005 | | 10/24/2017 |