| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MERCIER - 75 MJ 643 | UNITED STATES V MERCIER - 75 MJ 643
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 001-62-16 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 3/18/2016 | 3/18/2016 | | 9/1/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MERRITT - PER CURIAM | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of
guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of the following
offenses: one specification of making a false official statement, in violation of Article 107,
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of wrongfully using marijuana in
violation of Article 112a, UCMJ; and one specification of committing indecent acts with a
person not his wife, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. Appellant was sentenced to a bad conduct
discharge, confinement for 120 days and reduction to pay grade E-1. | Docket No. 1214 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 9/30/2004 | 9/30/2004 | | 10/18/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MICHAELS RECONSIDERATION - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V MICHAELS RECONSIDERATION - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 1352 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 9/12/2012 | 9/12/2012 | | 9/18/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MIERES (84 M.J. 682) CORRECTED | A general court-martial of members with enlisted representation convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of failure to obey a lawful order and one specification of assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Articles 92 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Appellant was sentenced to reduction to E-3, restriction for 15 days, and a letter of reprimand. Judgment was entered accordingly.
Decision
We determine that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved. Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence, as approved below, are affirmed. | Docket No. 1491 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 6/10/2024 | 6/10/2024 | | 5/19/2025 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MILEY - PER CURIAM | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of the following offenses: one specification of failure to obey a lawful general order, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of making false official statements, in violation of Article 107, UCMJ; and one specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ. | Docket No. 1194 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 3/3/2004 | 3/3/2004 | | 10/18/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MILLER - 61 MJ 827 | Appellant was tried by special court-martial military judge alone on 21 November 2003. After conviction of various drug offenses pursuant to pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was sentenced by the judge to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-1, which the Convening Authority approved on 18 June 2004. | DOCKET NO. 005-69-01 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/19/2005 | 10/19/2005 | | 10/24/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MINYEN - 57 MJ 804 | UNITED STATES V MINYEN - 57 MJ 804
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals - Opinion | Docket No. 1172 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/23/2002 | 12/23/2002 | | 9/18/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MIZELLE - UNPUBLISHED | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of conspiracy to commit larceny, in violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of making a false official statement, in violation of Article 107, UCMJ; and one specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for five months, reduction to E-1, and a bad conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged. The pretrial agreement did not affect the sentence. | Docket No. 1337 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/28/2010 | 10/28/2010 | | 10/30/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MOHAMMAD PER CURIAM | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of twelve specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The military judge sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 120 days, and reduction to E-1. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged, but suspended confinement in excess of sixty days for a period of twelve months from the date the sentence was announced, which results in a shorter confinement period than required by the terms of the pretrial agreement. | Docket No. 1223 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/18/2005 | 11/18/2005 | | 10/24/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MOLINA - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V MOLINA - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Opinion | Docket No. 1393 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 9/18/2015 | 9/18/2015 | | 9/15/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MOLINA - 68 MJ 532 | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of wrongfully engaging in sexually intimate behavior aboard a Coast Guard vessel, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); two specifications of maltreating a person subject to his orders by making offensive comments or gestures of a sexual nature, in violation of Article 93, UCMJ; one specification of assault consummated by a battery in violation of article 128, and one specification each of indecent exposure, wrongfully providing alcoholic beverages to a person under twenty-one years of age, and adultery, all in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for 200 days, reduction to E-1, and a bad-conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged. The pretrial agreement did not affect the sentence. | Docket No. 1299 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 9/9/2009 | 9/9/2009 | | 10/30/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MOLINARI (MERITS) | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of conspiracy, in violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of making a false official statement, in violation of Article 107, UCMJ; and one specification each of an indecent act and obstructing justice, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for three months, reduction to E-1, and a bad-conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged, but suspended confinement in excess of forty-five days for six months, pursuant to the pretrial agreement. | Docket No. 1309 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 9/2/2009 | 9/2/2009 | | 10/30/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MOLINARY - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V MOLINARY - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Opinion | Docket No. 1440 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 7/12/2017 | 7/12/2017 | | 9/1/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MONGROO PER CURIAM | Appellant was tried by general court-martial, judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of the following offenses: one specification of making a false official statement, in violation of Article 107, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of assault with a dangerous weapon, a baseball bat, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ; and one specification of making a false distress call, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. | Docket No. 1204 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 1/31/2005 | 1/31/2005 | | 10/24/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MONTES - 60 MJ 759 | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of nineteen specifications of violating a general order by using Coast Guard office equipment to view sexually explicit material, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The military judge sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-3. The Convening Authority approved the sentence, which was not affected by the pretrial agreement. Before this Court, Appellant has assigned three errors. The Court heard oral argument on the assignments on 23 June 2004. We discuss them in turn, and affirm. | Docket No. 1202 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/19/2004 | 11/19/2004 | | 10/18/2017 |