CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MONTUORO - 68 MJ 565Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of conspiracy, in violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of failure to obey a general order, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ; one specification of false official statements, in violation of Article 107, UCMJ; and one specification each of obstruction of justice and wrongfully providing a minor with alcoholic beverages, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for nine months, reduction to E-1, and a bad-conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged.Docket No. 1307Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals11/12/200911/12/200910/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MOORE - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V MOORE - UNPUBLISHED - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1143Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals3/12/20013/12/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MORRIS - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V MORRIS - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsDocket No. 1354Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals5/21/20125/21/20129/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MORROW - UNPUBLISHEDAppellant was tried by general court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of failure to obey a lawful general order, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of making false official statements, in violation of Article 107, UCMJ; one specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ; and one specification each of mail fraud and of unauthorized selling of transit benefit tickets, both in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for four months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to E-3, and a bad-conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged, but suspended the bad-conduct discharge and confinement in excess of ninety days for six months.Docket No. 1300Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals4/8/20094/8/200910/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MURPHY - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V MURPHY - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals - OpinionDocket No. 1343Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 12/13/201112/13/20119/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V NAPUTIAppellant was tried by general court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), by wrongfully and knowingly possessing child pornography, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and of one specification of dereliction of duty, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to be discharged from the Coast Guard with a dishonorable discharge, reduction to E-1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for three years. Pursuant to the terms of the pretrial agreement, the Convening Authority reduced the dishonorable discharge to a bad-conduct discharge and suspended all confinement in excess of eighteen months for a period of twelve months from the date Appellant is released from confinement.Docket No. 1286Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals12/16/200812/16/200810/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V NAPUTI II - 68 MJ 538Appellant was tried by general court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of violating 18 U.S.C. 2252A(a)(5)(B) by knowingly and wrongfully possessing child pornography, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); and one specification of dereliction of duty, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for three years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to E-1, and a dishonorable discharge. Pursuant to the terms of the pretrial agreement, the Convening Authority reduced the dishonorable discharge to a bad-conduct discharge and suspended all confinement in excess of eighteen months for a period of twelve months from the date Appellant is released from confinement.Docket No. 1286Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals7/29/20097/29/200910/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V NEASE - PER CURIAMUNITED STATES V NEASE - PER CURIAM Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals - OpinionDocket No. 1166Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals11/6/200211/6/20029/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V NENNI (2024 WL 4454934)A general court-martial of members with enlisted representation convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of abusive sexual contact in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Appellant was sentenced to reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $1,278 per month for six months, and a bad-conduct discharge. Judgment was entered accordingly. Appellant raises two assignments of error: (1) His due process right to timely appellate review was violated; and (2) The convening authorities violated his equal protection right when they solicited, received, and presumptively considered panel members’ race and gender in selecting who would serve on appellant’s court-martial. We conclude there is no prejudicial error and affirm. Decision We determine that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved. Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence, as approved below, are affirmed.Docket No. 1494Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals10/10/202410/10/20245/19/2025
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V NEWBY - UNPUBLISHEDAppellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of dereliction of duty, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); two specifications of assault, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ; and one specification of making a false official statement, in violation of Article 107, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for sixty days, restriction for forty-five days, reduction to pay grade E-2, forfeiture of fifty dollars per month for twelve months, and a bad-conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged except for the restriction, but suspended the bad-conduct discharge for six months pursuant to the pretrial agreement.Docket No. 1316Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals7/14/20107/14/201010/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V NEWMANS - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V NEWMANS - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsDocket No. 1402Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals5/23/20165/23/20169/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V NICKEY (MERITS)Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification each of larceny of military property, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and of making a false official statement, in violation of Article 107, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for three months, reduction to E-3, and a bad-conduct discharge.Docket No. 1288Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals6/19/20086/19/200810/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V NYGREN - 53 MJ 716UNITED STATES V NYGREN - 53 MJ 716 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeal DecisionDocket No. 1127Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals7/13/20007/13/20008/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V ODONNELL - 65 MJ 795Appellant was tried by general court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The military judge sentenced Appellant to a dismissal, confinement for fifteen months, and a reprimand. The Convening Authority approved only so much of the sentence as includes a reprimand and confinement for fifteen months, but suspended confinement in excess of twelve months for a period of twelve months from the date of the Convening Authority’s action, pursuant to the terms of the pretrial agreement.Docket No. 1250Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals10/11/200710/11/200710/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V OLEAN - 56 MJ 594UNITED STATES V OLEAN - 56 MJ 594 Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1107Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals10/6/200110/6/20018/31/2017
Page 22 of 34

Oral Arguments


Pursuant to U.S. Department of Defense Standard carrying out Article 140a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [10 U.S.C. s. 940a] (revised, January 2025), an audio recording of an oral argument will typically be made publicly accessible. Audio recordings for oral arguments after the effective date of this new rule (January 2025) are below. As part of this requirement, a military service provides a mechanism by which a written transcript may be made available upon request. Contact HQS-DG-LST-CG-LMJ@uscg.mil with the reason for the request. 

 

Parties Docket Audio File Date
U.S. v. Ray 1498 MP3 2025/05/13
U.S. v. Kelley 1495 MP3 2025/03/26