| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1653 - WIRICK | By order dated 14 November 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New York, N. Y. suspended Appellant's seaman
documents for two months outright plus four months on twelve
months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that, while serving as an able
seaman on board the United States SS WOLVERINE STATE under
authority of the document above described, on or about 13 September
1966, while the ship was at Bremerhaven, Germany, Appellant
wrongfully failed to report aboard to shift the vessel; that on or
about 21 September 1966, while the ship was at Le Havre, France,
Appellant wrongfully failed to obey a lawful order of the Chief
Mate; that on or about the same date and while the vessel was at
the same place, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his assigned
duties and left the vessel without permission.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the second, third and fourth specification, but entered a plea of
guilty to the first specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a copy of the
ship's shipping articles and certified copies of entries from the
ship's Official Logbook.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved; the first specification by plea, and the others by
substantial evidence. The Examiner then entered an order
suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of two
months outright plus months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1653 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 8/4/1967 | 8/4/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1655 - MCGRUDER | By order dated 12 August 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for four months outright plus four months on
twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct.
The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an
oiler on board the United States SS AMERICAN PLANTER under
authority of the document above described, in May, June, and July
1966, Appellant failed to perform his duties on eleven dates.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and each
specification.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved by plea. The Examiner then served a written order
on Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of four months outright plus four months on twelve months' probation.
The entire decision was served on 9 September 1966. Appeal
was timely filed on 9 September 1966. | Appeal No. 1655 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 8/10/1967 | 8/10/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1656 - FONTANEZ | By order dated 22 November 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman
documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding
him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges
that while serving as a passenger utility on board the United
States SS SANTA PAULA under authority of the document above
described, on or about 14 September 1966, Appellant, while ashore
in the port of La Guaira, Venezuela, did wrongfully assault and
battered Leon Joseph Loiseau, a fellow crewmember.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence an entry from
the ship's Logbook and the testimony of three witnesses one of
which was the alleged victim.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence a statement of the
alleged victim made while aboard ship, and his own testimony and
that of another witness.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and one
specification had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order
suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of three
months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1656 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 8/28/1967 | 8/28/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1657 - SCOTT | By order dated 26 October 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended Appellant seaman
documents for six months outright upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as an ordinary seaman on board the United States SS SHIRLEY
LYKES under authority of the document above described, on or about
12 August 1966, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered with
his fist Mr. Finley Burch, a fellow crewmember, while the vessel
was at sea.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence entries from
the ship's shipping articles and from its Official Logbook, and the
testimony of four witnesses.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the written
statement of a fellow crewmember. It was admitted into the record
by stipulation of the parties.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months outright. | Appeal No. 1657 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 9/20/1967 | 9/20/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1658 - POULES | By order dated 25 August 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked
Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct.
The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an
ordinary seamen on board the United States SS LOYOLA VICTORY under
authority of the document above described, on or about 31 May 1966,
and 1 and 2 June 1966, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his
regular assigned duties due, on 1 and 2 June 1966, to his having
been in a state of intoxication.
Appellant failed to appear at the hearing after having been
served with notice thereof and of the charge and specifications.
It was, therefore, conducted in absentia and the Examiner entered
a plea of not guilty in Appellant's behalf to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence entries from the ship's Shipping Articles and Official Logbook.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order revoking all
documents, issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1658 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 9/20/1967 | 9/20/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1659 - WILSON | By order dated 14 December 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended Appellant's
seaman documents for 6 months outright plus 6 months on 12 months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as an able
seamen on board the United States SS SOLON TURMAN under authority
of the document above described. (1) on or about 9 November 1966,
while such vessel was at New Orleans, La., Appellant wrongfully
violated a Federal Statute by failing to declare dutiable
merchandise and attempted to take ashore such property without
fulfilling certain formalities required by the United States Bureau
of Customs; (2) on or about 9 November 1966, while such vessel was
at New Orleans, La., Appellant wrongfully violated a Federal
Statute by attempting to destroy evidence, which was in the process
of being seized; (3) on or about 2 November 1966, while such vessel
was at Houston, Texas, Appellant wrongfully had intoxicating liquor
aboard such vessel; and (4) on or about 9 November 1966, while suchvessel was at New Orleans, La., Appellant wrongfully had ships
cargo in his possession.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the first,
second and fourth specifications. He entered a plea of guilty to
the third specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of three witnesses and the following exhibits:
(A) Five bottles of scotch
(B) One bottle of wine
(C) Remains of cardboard carton
(D) Copy of a portion of a Manifest and Freight List
indicating consignment of 50 cartons of wine
(E) Copy of a portion of Manifest and Freight List indicating
consignment of 150 cartons of whiskey
(F) Two delivery receipts indicating delivery of 49 cases of
the wine described in (D) above and of 149 cases of the
whiskey described in (E) above | Appeal No. 1659 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 9/20/1967 | 9/20/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1660 - MCGRUDER | By order dated 19 January 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman
documents for 12 months outright plus 12 months on 18 months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege: (1) that while serving as an
oiler on board the United States SS CHARLES LYKES under authority
of the document above described, on or about 30 and 31 October
1966, and 1 November 1966, Appellant did wrongfully absent himself
from the vessel while it was in the port of Manila, Republic of the
Philippines; (2) that Appellant, while serving as indicated above,
on or about 2 through 9 November 1966, between the hours of 0000
and 0800, did wrongfully absent himself from the vessel while it
was in the port of Manila, Republic of the Philippines; (3) that
Appellant, while serving as indicated above, on or about 15
November 1966, between the hours of 0000 and 0400, did wrongfully
fail to perform his assigned duties due to intoxication while the
vessel was in the port of Manila, Republic of the Philippines; (4)that Appellant, while serving as indicated above, on or about 23
and 24 November 1966, between the hours of 0000 and 0800, did
wrongfully absent himself from the vessel while it was in the port
of Saigon, Viet Nam; (5) that Appellant, while serving as indicated
above, on or about 28 and 29 November 1966, between the hours of
0000 and 0800, did wrongfully absent himself from the vessel while
it was in the port of Saigon, Viet Nam; (6) that Appellant while
serving as indicated above, on or about 3 and 4 December 1966,
between the hours of 0000 and 0800, did wrongfully absent himself
from the vessel while it was in the port of Saigon, Viet Nam; and
(7) that Appellant, while serving as indicated above, on or about
9 December 1966, between the hours of 0000 and 0800, did wrongfully
absent himself from the vessel while it was in the port of Saigon,
Viet Nam. | Appeal No. 1660 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 9/20/1967 | 9/20/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1661 - TERREAULT | By order dated 18 February 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New York, N. Y. suspeneded Appellant's
liscense for three months upon finding him guilty of negligence.
The specifications found proved allege that while serving as master
on board the SS MORANIA MARLIN under authority of the license above
described, on or about 12 January 1966, Appellant failed to keep to
the right in a narrow channel (33 U.S.C. 210) and failed to keep
out of the way as burdened vessel in a crossing situation (33
U.S.C. 204), both faults contributing to collision with MV PATRICIA
MORAN.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain
documents and the testimony of the pilot of PATRICIA MORAN.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony,
but only as to the first specification.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and both
specifications had been proved. The Examiner entered an order
suspending Appellant's license for a period of three months. | Appeal No. 1661 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 10/5/1967 | 10/5/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1662 - TUCKER | By order dated 23 December 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman
documents for 12 months outright plus 6 months on 18 months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications allege that while serving as an able seaman on board
the United States SS U. S. BUILDER, under authority of the document
above described, (1) on or about 10 November 1966, Appellant
wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties between 1300 and
1700 hours by reason of being absent from the vessel while it was
in a foreign port; (2) on or about 15 November 1966, Appellant
wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties between 0800 and
1700 hours by reason of being absent from the vessel while it was
in a foreign port; (3) on or about 16 November 1966, Appellant
wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties between 0800 and
1700 hours by reason of being absent from the vessel while it was
in a foreign port; (4) on or about 17 November 1966, Appellant
wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties by reason of being absent from the vessel while it was in a foreign port; (5) on or
about 18 November 1966, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his
assigned duties between 0800 and 1600 hours while the vessel was in
a foreign port; and (6) on or about 19 November 1966, Appellant
wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties between 0000 and
0400 hours, due to being in a state of intoxication, while the
vessel was at sea. | Appeal No. 1662 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 10/5/1967 | 10/5/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1663 - GONZALEZ | By order dated 6 October 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman
documents for 2 months outright plus 4 months on 18 months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a general
utility on board the United States SS UNITED STATES under authority
of the document above described, on or about 5 August 1966, while
the vessel was at sea, Appellant (1) did wrongfully assault Jasper
L. Nichols, the assistant second steward, by shaking his fist at
Mr. Nichols; (2) did wrongfully assault and batter Mr. Nichols; and
(3) did wrongfully threaten to kill Mr. Nichols.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence entries from the ship's Shipping Articles and its Official Logbook and the
testimony of Mr. Nichols.
In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and three
specifications had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order
suspending all documents, issued to Appellant, for a period of 2
months outright plus 4 months on 18 months' probation. | Appeal No. 1663 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 10/5/1967 | 10/5/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1664 - TICER | By order dated 7 April 1966, an Examiner of the United
States
Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's
seaman's
documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct.
The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as
boatswain
on board the United States SS WHITEHALL under authority of
the
document above described,
Appellant:
(1) on 7 January 1966, wrongfully absented himself
from
the vessel at Qui Nanh, Viet Nam; and on 3 February 1966; at
Naha,
Okinawa,
(2) assaulted and battered the chief
mate,
(3) failed to obey an order of the chief
mate,
(4) assaulted and battered the
master,
(5) incited the deck crew to refuse to obey
orders,
(6) created a disturbance by reason of
intoxication,
(7) failed to perform duties by reason of
intoxication;
and
(8) on 5 February 1966, at sea, had liquor in hispossession without
authority.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by
professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge
and
each specification, except the eighth to which he pleaded
guilty. | Appeal No. 1664 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 10/10/1967 | 10/10/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1665 - PASCOE | By order dated 16 March 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended Appellant's seaman
documents for six months outright upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as an able seaman on board the United States SS DICK LYKES
under authority of the document above described, on or about 26
October 1966, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter a fellow
crewmember.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence entries from
the ship's shipping articles and its official Logbook; the
testimony of the ship's master; a deposition taken from a
crewmember; and, by stipulation with Appellant, the written statements of two other crewmembers.
Appellant offered no evidence in his defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then served a written order on
Appellant suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period
of six months outright. | Appeal No. 1665 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 10/23/1967 | 10/23/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1666 - WARD | By order dated 21 March 1967, and Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at San Francisco, Calif., suspended Appellant's
seaman documents for 6 months outright upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as Scullion on board the United States SS PRESIDENT
CLEVELAND under authority of the documents above described, on or
about 19 January 1967, Appellant wrongfully deserted the vessel
while it was in the port of Hong Kong.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved by plea. The Examiner then entered an order
suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of 6
months outright. | Appeal No. 1666 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 10/31/1967 | 10/31/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1667 - GAINES | By order dated 7 December 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended Appellant's
seaman documents for six months outright upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while
serving as a night cook and baker on board the United States SS
ALCOA VOYAGER under authority of the document above described, on
or about 3 October 1966, while the vessel was at Ceylon, Appellant
did wrongfully address the Chief Steward with foul and abusive
language; did wrongfully assault the Chief Steward by brandishing
his fist and a knife in the direction of the Chief Steward; and did
wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Steward by pushing him.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and each
specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence copies of entries from the ship's Shipping Articles and its Official Logbook
and the testimony of the Chief Steward, the Master, and the third
Cook.
Appellant offered no evidence in his defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months outright. | Appeal No. 1667 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 11/8/1967 | 11/8/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1668 - HESSE | By order dated 14 April 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, Calif., suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for one month outright plus three months on
twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct.
The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a
messman on board the United States SS FRONTENAC VICTORY under
authority of the document above described, on or about 17, 19, and
25 November 1966, at Sattahip, Thailand, and on or about 11
December 1966, at Manila, P.I., Appellant wrongfully failed to
perform his duties by reason of intoxication.
At the hearing, Appellant failed to appear. The Examiner
entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of FRONTENAC VICTORY.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a decision in
which he concluded that the charge and specifications had been
proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of one month outright
plus three months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1668 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 11/8/1967 | 11/8/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1669 - SHADE | By order dated 26 May 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's
seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of
"conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification
found proved alleges that while a holder of the document above
described, on or about 19 September 1963, Appellant was convicted
of a violation of Section 11715 of The Health and Safety Code, a
narcotic drug law of the State of California.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a copy of a
judgement of conviction.
In defense, Appellant offered matters in mitigation.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved by plea. The Examiner then entered an order
revoking all documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1669 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 11/8/1967 | 11/8/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1670 - MILLER | By order dated 29 November 1965, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y. suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for two months upon finding him guilty of negligence.
The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a
pilot on board the United States SS SEATRAIN GEORGIA under
authority of the license above described, on or about 11 March
1965, Appellant, while his vessel was in the position of a burdened
vessel as to SS CANDY in New York Harbor:
(1) failed to take action to keep out of the way
of CANDY;
(2) crossed ahead of the privileged CANDY without
reasonable cause;
(3) failed to slacken speed, stop, or reverse; and
(4) failed to sound a danger signal when the
intentions of the other vessel were in doubt;
all contributing to a collision with CANDY.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of the master of CANDY, the pilot of CANDY, and the pilot of
another vessel, and the stipulated testimony of the chief officer
of GEORGIA.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony,
that of two other Sandy Hook pilots who were witnesses aboard other
ships, and that of an expert.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
licenses issued to Appellant for a period of two months. | Appeal No. 1670 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 11/24/1967 | 11/24/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1671 - DURDEN | By order dated 26 July 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for one year upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as a wiper on board the United States SS TRANSONTARIO under
authority of the document above described, on or about 23 June
1967, Appellant assaulted and battered with a dangerous weapon, a
knife, Glen G. Gill, the ship's radio officer.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer and Counsel presented to the
Examiner a stipulated "Agreement on Facts". The agreement included
a recommendation for a suspension of one year.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved by the stipulation. The Examiner then entered an
order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of
one year. | Appeal No. 1671 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/20/1967 | 12/20/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1672 - GUTIERREZ | By order dated 25 May, 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's
documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for
a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved
alleges that while holder of the document above described, on or
about 29 August 1966, Appellant was convicted of violation of 18
U.S.C. 1407 in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence copies of the
indictment and of the judgment of conviction.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence matters in
mitigating.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved by plea. The Examiner then entered an order
revoking all documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1672 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/20/1967 | 12/20/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1673 - MATTE | By order dated 25 January 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas, revoked Appellant's
seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of
"conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification
found proved alleges that while holder of the document above
described, on or about 6 June 1963, Appellant was convicted of
possession of a narcotic drug in violation of a narcotic drug law
of the State of Texas, in the Criminal District Court of Jefferson
County, Texas.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certified
minutes of the conviction.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence matter in
mitigation.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved by plea. The Examiner then entered an order
revoking all documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1673 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/20/1967 | 12/20/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1674 - DOCKENDORF | By order dated 8 February 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for six months on twelve months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification
found proved alleges that while serving as radio officer on board
the United States SS SANTA INES under authority of the document and
license above described, on or about 11 January 1967, Appellant
deserted the vessel at Honolulu, Hawaii.
Appellant failed to appear for hearing.
The Examiner entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence
voyage records of SANTA INES.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months on twelve
months' probation. | Appeal No. 1674 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/27/1967 | 12/27/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1675 - SHELBY | By order dated 16 February 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at San Francisco., California, revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as a messman aboard the United States SS MONTEREY under
authority of the document above described, on or about 27 May 1967,
at Auckland, New Zealand, Appellant had in his possession a
dangerous drug, Indian Hemp.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence an
authenticated copy of an entry in the Criminal Record Book of the
Magistrate's Court of Auckland, New Zealand.
In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a decision in
which he concluded that the charge and specification had been
proved. The Examiner then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1675 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/27/1967 | 12/27/1967 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1676 - CALLAWAY | By order dated 31 January 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New York, N. Y., suspended Appellant's
license for 2 months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The
specifications found proved alleged that while serving as master of
the United States SS SEATRAIN GEORGIA under authority of the
license above described, on or about 11 March 1965, Appellant
allowed his vessel to be navigated contrary to law in circumstances
under which it was the burdened vessel in a crossing situation in
New York Harbor with respect to SS CANDY.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of several witnesses and several documents, including voyage
records.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony,
several documents, and transcripts of testimony of other witnesses
given in other proceedings.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending
Appellant's license for a period of two months. | Appeal No. 1676 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/4/1968 | 1/4/1968 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1677 - CANJAR | By order dated 1 June 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's
documents upon finding him mentally incompetent for duty on
merchant vessels.
Two charges were initially preferred against Appellant. One
was of MISCONDUCT, this had four specifications. The first two
specifications alleged that while Appellant was serving as third
mate aboard SS AMERICAN SHIPPER he twice assaulted and battered the
second mate of the vessel at Hamburg, Germany, once with his fist
and once with a club, both on 22 August 1966. The other two
specifications alleged that while Appellant was serving as third
mate aboard SS CITY OF ALMA he did, on many occasions between 27 December 1965 and 12 January 1966, cause course changes of the vessel to be made, deviating from the prescribed courses, without permission of or notification to the master of the ship.
The other charge, of INCOMPETENCE, alleged that Appellant was, at the time of his service aboard CITY OF ALMA, unfit for service aboard merchant vessel because of mental incompetence and so remained to time of hearing.
At the hearing Appellant, although he had been advised of his
right to counsel three days earlier, appeared at first without
counsel and expressed a desire to obtain counsel. Six days later
Appellant appeared with professional counsel. This counsel
attempted to withdraw from the case before the day's proceedings
were completed, but Appellant consented to his continued
representation by the counsel. Pleas of not guilty to all charges
and specifications were entered. Two days later, before the first
witness was called, Appellant formally, on the record, disavowed
his counsel and elected to proceed on his own. | Appeal No. 1677 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/18/1968 | 1/18/1968 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1678 - VANTESLAAR | By order dated 3 March 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New York, N. Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for two months on twelve months' probation upon finding
him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege
that while serving as a third assistant engineer on board the
United States SS PONCE under authority of the document and license
above described, on or about 7 January 1966, Appellant assaulted
and battered, and used abusive language to, the Chief Engineer of
the vessel, at Houston, Texas.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of two witnesses and a deposition of a third witness.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence several documents,
photograph, and his own testimony.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and two
specifications had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order
suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of two
months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1678 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/29/1968 | 1/29/1968 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1680 - BEALS | By order dated 29 August 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as a radio officer on board the United States SS WILLAMETTE
VICTORY under authority of the document and license above
described, on or about 2 June 1967, Appellant wrongfully had
marijuana in his possession while the vessel was at Qui Nhon,
Vietnam.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of several witnesses and an envelope containing a hand-folded packet which, in turn, contained a "brownish grassy looking
substance," identified on the record as marijuana. This real
evidence was delivered back to an employee of the Bureau of
Customs, and a written description was substituted in the record.
In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf. | Appeal No. 1680 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2/29/1968 | 2/29/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1679 - RODRIGUEZ | By order dated 28 April 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's
documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a bedroom
steward on board the United States SS UNITED STATES under authority
of the document above described, on or about 27 August 1966,
Appellant
(1) wrongfully molested an eleven year old female
passenger;
(2) wrongfully had in his possession a master key; and
(3) wrongfully, while off duty, entered a passenger area
without permission.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of certain witnesses and voyage records of SS UNITED STATES.
In defense, Appellant placed in evidence the testimony of five
witnesses, and testified in his own behalf.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order revoking all
documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1679 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2/29/1968 | 2/29/1968 | | 12/28/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1681 - HENDRICKS | By order dated 27 July 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for six months outright plus six months on 18
months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specification found proved alleges that while serving as a
fireman/watertender on board the United States SS MANDERSON VICTORY
under authority of the document above described, on or about 8 and
9 June 1967, Appellant failed to stand four sea watches because of
intoxication while the vessel was at Honolulu, Hawaii.
Appellant did not appear for hearing. The Examiner entered a
plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of MANDERSON VICTORY.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered written decision in which concluded that the charge and specification had
been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months outright
plus six months on 18 months' probation.
The entire decision was served on 2 August 1967. Appeal was
timely filed on 17 August 1967. Although Appellant was furnished
a transcript of proceedings at his request, on 28 August 1967, no
further perfection of his Appeal was made beyond the original
notice. | Appeal No. 1681 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/5/1968 | 3/5/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1682 - AGUEDA | By order dated 23 August 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for nine months outright upon finding him guilty
of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as a mess man on board the United States SS AMES VICTORY
under authority of the document above described, from 8 July 1967
through 19 July 1967, Appellant was absent from the vessel without
permission while the ship was at Sattatip, Thailand.
Appellant did not appear for hearing. The Examiner entered a
plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of AMES VICTORY.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification has been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of nine months. | Appeal No. 1682 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/14/1968 | 3/14/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1683 - SIPE | By order dated 3 February 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for 3 months outright plus 3 months on 12
months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a deck
maintenance man on board the United States SS HIGH POINT VICTORY
under authority of the document above described, on or about 22
December 1966, Appellant wrongfully destroyed a lock on a ship's
door with a fire axe, wrongfully failed to join, and deserted at
Yokohama, Japan.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and the
specifications alleging the breaking of the lock and the failure to
join, but not guilty to the desertion.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of HIGH POINT VICTORY and the testimony of six witnesses.
In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a decision in
which he concluded that the charge and three specifications had
been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months outright
plus three months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1683 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/14/1968 | 3/14/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1684 - KENNEDY | By order dated 22 June 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, Calif., suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for six months outright plus three months on 12
months' probation upon findings him guilty of misconduct. The
specification found proved alleges that while serving as a night
cook and baker on board the United States SS LYNN VICTORY under
authority of the document above described, on or about 22 May 1967,
Appellant assaulted and battered with his fists the vessel's second
assistant engineer at Qui Nhon, South Vietnam.
At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Examiner
entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of two witnesses and certain voyage records of LYNN VICTORY.
Since Appellant did not appear, no defense was offered.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months outright
plus three months on 12 months' probation | Appeal No. 1684 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/15/1968 | 3/15/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1685 - WIGREN | By order dated 5 April 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at Philadelphia, Pa., suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for six months outright plus six months on eighteen
months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as an oiler
on board the United States SS U. S. EXPLORER under authority of the
document above described, Appellant:
(1) on or about 19 February 1967, at Manila, R. P., wrongfully
had liquor in his possession aboard the vessel,
(2) on or about 26, 27 and 28 February and 1 March 1967, at
Saigon, South Vietnam, wrongfully absented himself from the vessel
and his duties, and
(3) on or about 15 March 1967, at Aden, Arabia, was unable to
perform duties because of intoxication.
At the hearing, Appellant failed to appear. The Examiner
entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of U. S. EXPLORER.
Since Appellant did not appear, there was no defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and all
specifications had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order
suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of six
months outright plus six months on eighteen months' probation. | Appeal No. 1685 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/15/1968 | 3/15/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1686 - ECHEVARRIA | By order dated 8 June 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for six months outright plus 4 months on 12 months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification
found proved alleges that while serving as a bedroom steward on
board the United States SS INDEPENDENCE under authority of the
document above described, on or about 11 March 1967, Appellant
assaulted and battered one Ira T. Lee by kicking and punching him
when the vessel was at Dakar, F.W.A.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain
voyage records of INDEPENDENCE, the testimony of two persons, and medical reports on Ira T. Lee. The Examiner refused to grant the
Investigating Officer a delay to obtain another witness. When the
Investigating Officer stated that he was not resting his case the
Examiner said, "I will deem that you have rested".
In defense, Appellant then offered in evidence his own
testimony and statements made about him by other persons. These
statement were obtained by an unidentified "private investigator".
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months outright
plus four months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1686 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/18/1968 | 3/18/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1687 - BAKER | By order dated 21 December 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's
license for 12 months outright plus 6 months on 18 months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. At the same time
the Examiner suspended Appellant's Merchant Mariner Document for 12
months. The specifications found proved allege that while serving
as firts assistant engineer on board the United States SS HANS
ISBRANDTSEN under authority of the document and license above
described, on or about 20, 21, 22, and 23 November 1966 Appellant
wrongfully failed to stand watches while the vessel was in a
foreign port, and that on 22 November 1966 at a foreign port
Appellant disobeyed an order of the Master, by going ashore.
At the hearing, Appellant failed to appear. The Examiner
entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of two witnesses and certain voyage records of HANS ISBRANDTSEN.
Since the proceeding was held in absentia, no defense was
offered.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a decision in
which he concluded that the charge and specifications had been
proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of 12 months outright,
plus an additional 6 months on 18 months' probation with respect to
Appellant's license only. | Appeal No. 1687 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/19/1968 | 3/19/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1688 - YOUNG | By order dated 2 August 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's
seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of
"conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification
found proved alleges that while a holder of the document above
described, on 28 November 1956, Appellant was convicted in
Municipal Court for the City and county of San Francisco of
violation of 11721 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of
California.
Appellant did not appear at the hearing. The Examiner entered
a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence documentary
proof that Appellant was in fact holder of the document in question
on the date alleged and that Appellant had been convicted as
alleged. Because of Appellant's absence, nothing was offered in
defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner entered an order revoking all
documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1688 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/19/1968 | 3/19/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1689 - PRIDGEN | By order dated 5 August 1966, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at Boston, Mass. suspended Appellant's license for two
months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications
found proved allege that while serving as master on board the
United States MV MAUMEE SUN under authority of the license above
described, on or about 23 November 1965, Appellant negligently
failed to maintain a proper lookout, and failed to navigate with
caution after hearing a danger signal from SS AMERICAN PILOT,
thereby contributing to a collision with that vessel.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence testimony
previously taken from the pilot of AMERICAN PILOT, from the chief
engineer, and the helmsman of MAUMEE SUN, and from the Corps of
Engineers marine observer from WING'S NECK.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own previously
taken testimony and that of certain live witnesses.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered decision in
which he concluded that the charge and two specifications had been
proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending Appellant's
license for a period of two months. | Appeal No. 1689 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/25/1968 | 3/25/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1690 - KOKINS | By order dated 30 March 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's
documents for five months upon finding him guilty of misconduct.
The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an AB
seaman on board the United States SS SANTA EMILIA under authority
of the document above described,Appellant:
(1) On 1 January 1967 wrongfully failed to join the
vessel at Subic Bay, P.I.;
(2) from 10 through 15 January 1967, at Sattahip,
Thailand, wrongfully failed to perform his duties; and
(3) from 16 through 18 January 1967, wrongfully failed
to perform duties aboard the vessel by reason of
intoxication.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigation Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of SANTA EMILIA.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of a
witness who missed the ship at the same time as he at Subic Bay,
and a certificate of discharge.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved as stated above. The Examiner then entered an
order suspending all documents, issued to Appellant, for a period
of five months. | Appeal No. 1690 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/27/1968 | 3/27/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1691 - GLOTZER | By order dated 29 March 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for six months. The specification found proved
alleges that while serving as an ordinary seaman on board the
United States SS RIDGEFIELD VICTORY under authority of the document
above described, on or about 12 January 1967, Appellant deserted
his vessel at Bangkok, Thailand.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence copies of
voyage records of RIDGEFIELD VICTORY.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. | Appeal No. 1691 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/27/1968 | 3/27/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1692 - SMITH | By order dated 8 June 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman
documents for one month outright plus two months on twelve months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification
found proved alleges that while serving as a deck utility on board
the United States SS CHARLES LYKES under authority of the document
above described, on or about 23 May 1967, Appellant pilfered ship's
cargo (two cases of beer), at San Juan Puerto Rico.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.
In defense, Appellant offered evidence in mitigation.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved by plea. The Examiner then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of
one month outright plus two months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1692 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/27/1968 | 3/27/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1694 - KUNTZ | By order dated 16 November 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, revoked Appellant's
seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Third
Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS CARROLL VICTORY
under authority of the license above described, Appellant
wrongfully failed to perform his duties on 3 December 1965, 5, 6,
8 and 16 January 1966; participated in a disturbance and wrongfully
had possession of intoxicants on 2 December 1965; wrongfully caused
ship's property to be destroyed on 5 January 1966; wrongfully
engaged in a fight on 8 January 1966; and wrongfully deserted the
vessel on 17 January 1966.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence log book
entries and other documentary evidence relating to the charge,
including deposition of the Chief Engineer, the Third Mate, and the
Master, and the testimony of the Master.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony,
the stipulated testimony of the Second Assistant Engineer, and
certain documents relating to the desertion specification. | Appeal No. 1694 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/1/1968 | 4/1/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1695 - NEMECEK | By order date 26 January 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for two months, upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while
serving as a fireman/watertender on board the United States SS WILD
RANGER under authority of the document above described, Appellant:
(1) on or about 27 October 1966, wrongfully failed to perform
duties at Saigon, Vietnam, because of intoxication;
(2) on or about 28 October 1966, wrongfully absented himself
from the vessel and his duties at Saigon; and
(3) from 4 through 8 November 1966, wrongfully failed to
perform duties at Qui Nhon, Vietnam.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence records of
WILD RANGER.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and all
specifications had been proved. The Examiner then served a written
order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for two
months. | Appeal No. 1695 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/1/1968 | 4/1/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1744 - POLACK | By order dated 3 April 1968, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New York, N. Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for two months outright plus four months on eight months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a first
class waiter on board SS UNITED STATES under authority of the
document above captioned on or about 18 February 1968, Appellant
wrongfully battered one Roque Mendez, another first class waiter,
and one Jerome Morris, the first class headwaiter and Appellant's
immediate superior.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of the UNITED STATES and the testimony of two witnesses, Mendez and Morris.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony
and that of two character witnesses who testified both for
Appellant and against Mendez.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of two months outright
plus four months on eight months' probation. | Appeal No. 1744 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/3/1968 | 4/3/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1696 - SCHANDL | By order dated 1 March 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for 6 months on 12 months' probation upon
finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved
alleges that while serving as boatswain on board the United States
SS PECOS under authority of the document above described, on or
about 8 February 1967, Appellant assaulted and battered by beating
with his fists a fellow crewmember, Gilbert RIEGEL, Ablebodied
seaman.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of the chief mate of the vessel.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of
three witnesses, and testified in his own behalf.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months on twelve
months' probation. | Appeal No. 1696 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/4/1968 | 4/4/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1698 - PETERS | By order dated 16 November 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked Appellant's
seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Second
Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS CARROLL VICTORY,
under authority of the license above described, on or about 2
December 1965, Appellant wrongfully had intoxicating liquor in his
possession, wrongfully participated in a disturbance, wrongfully
assaulted and battered another crewmember, and wrongfully failed to
perform his duties; on or about 16 January 1966 wrongfully failed
to perform his duties; and on or about 17 January 1966 wrongfully
deserted the vessel.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence logbook
entries relating to the specifications alleged, the depositions of
the Master and Third Mate, and the testimony of the Master.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony,
the testimony of the former Third Assistant Engineer, and certain
documents relating primarily to the desertion specification.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered an oral
decision in which he concluded that the charge and before mentioned
specifications had been proved. The Examiner then served a written
order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to him. | Appeal No. 1698 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/8/1968 | 4/8/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1697 - CAMENOS | By order dated 14 December 1966, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for six months upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while
serving as Master on board the United States SS ALDINA under
authority of the document and license above described Appellant:
1) on or about 7 November 1964 at Freeport, Bahamas,
wrongfully ordered third mate Woycke to make a false
entry of the draft on arrival in the deck log;
2) on the same date sailed the vessel from Freeport with the
applicable load line unlawfully submerged; and
3) between 31 December 1964 and 25 March 1965, wrongfully
operated the vessel with an expired certificate of
inspection.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records and inspection records of ALDINA, the vessel's load line
certificate, and the testimony of certain witnesses. | Appeal No. 1697 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/9/1968 | 4/9/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1699 - ODOM | By order dated 6 October 1967, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Mobile, Alabama, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for 6 months outright. The specification found
proved alleges that while serving as a Second Mate on board the
United States SS OCEANIC SPRAY, under authority of the license
above described, on or about 11 October 1966, Appellant assaulted
and battered a fellow crewmember.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence pertinent
entries from the Shipping Articles and the official logbook, the
testimony of the alleged victim and another eyewitness, and the
depositions of the Master, Chief Engineer, and Radio Operator.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony
and the testimony of the Third Mate.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered and oral
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then served a written order on
Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of 6
months outright. | Appeal No. 1699 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/15/1968 | 4/15/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1701 - SNIDER | By order dated 7 July 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, Calif., revoked Appellant's seaman's
documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for
a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved
alleges that, while the holder of a duly issued Merchant Mariner's
Document, Appellant was convicted of a violation of section 11500
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, a
narcotic drug law, on or about 13 February 1959, in Superior Court
for the County of Contra Costa, State of California.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant constructively entered a plea of not guilty to
the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a certified
copy of Appellant's parole status report and a certified copy of a
judgment, No. 6557, in the Superior Court for Contra Costa County, State of California, convicting Appellant of, among other things,
possession of narcotics in contravention of the California statute
described above.
Appellant offered no evidence in defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order revoking all
documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1701 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/16/1968 | 4/16/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1702 - MOROS | By order dated 8 August 1967 an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New Orleans, La. suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for four months upon finding him guilty of misconduct.
The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a
steward utility on board SS DEL SUD under authority of the document
above described, on or about 31 May 1967, Appellant wrongfully
failed to perform his assigned duties.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer offered no evidence with respect to
this specification.
In defense, Appellant offered no evidence
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered an oral
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved by plea. The Examiner then entered an order
suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of four
months. | Appeal No. 1702 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/16/1968 | 4/16/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1703 - GREENIDGE | By order dated 30 June 1967, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman
documents for two months on six months' probation upon finding him
guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that
while serving as oiler on board the United States SS ARGENTINA
under authority of the document above described, on or about 24
November 1966, Appellant twice disobeyed orders of the third
officer of the vessel, first, not to use a passenger gangway, and
second, not to use a passenger bus, at Bridgetown, Barbados.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of ARGENTINA.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony
and that of a witness.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered an oral
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of two months on six
months' probation. | Appeal No. 1703 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/19/1968 | 4/19/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1704 - BRYANT | By order dated 14 April 1967, and Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended Appellant's
seaman documents for six months outright plus six months on twelve
months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specification found proved alleges that while serving as Third Mate
on board the United States SS ANADARKO VICTORY under authority of
the document and license above described, on or about 4 April 1967,
Appellant assaulted and battered with his fists a fellow
crew-member, one Bartley M. Dyer.
At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Examiner
entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of the witness Bartley M. Dyer and voyage records of ANADARKO
VICTORY.
The Examiner introduced into evidence a letter relative to the
failure of Appellant to appear for hearing.
Since Appellant did not appear for hearing, there was no
defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months outright
plus six months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1704 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/25/1968 | 4/25/1968 | | 12/27/2017 |