CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2264 - MCKNIGHTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 December 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's Operator's License for two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Operator on board the Tug Holly under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 March 1980, Appellant negligently absented himself from the wheelhouse of the said vessel, leaving the responsibilities of navigation of the said vessel and its tow to an unlicensed deckhand, Woodard Willis, thereby contributing to the said vessel's collision with the N.C. Highway #58 Bridge across the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at approximately Mile 225.9. The hearing was held at Wilmington, North Carolina, on 28 August 1980. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2264Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/8/19819/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2265 - CAREYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 April 1980, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's document and all other valid Coast Guard documents for three (3) months on six (6) months' probation, upon finding him guilty of wrongful failure to join his vessel. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able bodied seaman aboard SS BEAVER STATE under authority of the document above captioned, on 24 November 1978, Appellant wrongfully failed to join his vessel off Labuan, Malaysia. The hearings were held at Long Beach, California, on 11 December 1979, and 8 January, 20 March and 11 April 1980. At the hearings on 11 December 1979 and 11 April 1980, Appellant appeared pro se, having been advised of his right to be represented by counsel of his choice and having waived this right at the hearing on 11 December 1979. At the hearing on 8 January 1980, the disposition of John Manning was taken on behalf of Appellant without Appellant or counsel present. At the brief hearing on 20 March 1980, the proceedings were continued, at Appellant's prior request, to 11 April 1980. At the hearing on 11 December 1979, Appellant had entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications.Appeal No. 2265Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/10/19819/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2266 - BRENNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 January 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's License for a period of one month and further suspended it for two months on probation for two months, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Operator aboard the Tug FORT McHENRY, under the authority of the captioned document, did at about 0625 on or about 5 December 1980, in the James River in the state of Virginia, at or near the city of Richmond, fail to safely navigate said vessel in such a manner as to preclude the barge she was pushing from grounding on the edge of the channel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of five witnesses and four documents, one being a video tape recording of the vessels during the period in question.Appeal No. 2266Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/13/198110/13/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2267 - ERVASTThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 June 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, revoked Appellant's captioned license upon finding him guilty of negligence and incompetence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Third Mate on board SS PIONEER COMMANDER under authority of the license above captioned Appellant was negligent: (1) on 11 January 1980, during his 0800 1200 watch, by failure to fix the vessel's position, while transiting the San Bernadina Straits, R.P.; (2) on 11 January 1980, during his 2000 to 2400 watch, by failure to fix the vessel's position while transiting the Sibuyan Sea, R.P.; (3) on 24 January 1980, during his 2000 to 2400 watch, by failure to locate the navigation light control panel in order to secure the anchor lights and energize the navigation lights; (4) on 31 January 1980, during his 0800 to 1200 watch, by failure to fix the vessel's position while navigating from Pusan to Chin Hae, Korea; (5) on 31 January 1980, during his 0800 tp 1200 watch, by failure to take anchor bearings to fix the vessel's position after anchoring at Chin Hae, Korea; (6) on 3 February 1980, during his 2000 to 2400 watch, by failure to accurately fix said vessel's position while transiting Osumi Kaykyo (Van Dieman Strait, Japan); (7) on 15 February 1980, by plotting said vessel's position at 1912 about 15 miles from its true position, while said vessel was in Pearl Harbor Channel, and (8) on 15 February 1980 by plotting an incorrect 2400 dead reckoning position for the vessel; and was incompetent by his acts and omissions, while standing deck watches on a foreign voyage, which demonstrated that he did not possess and exercise the professional skills of an ordinary, prudent, licensed third mate from 11 January to 15 February 1980.Appeal No. 2267Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/12/198111/12/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2209 - SIEGELMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, after a hearing at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 16 July 1979, suspended Appellant's document for a period of four months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as able seaman aboard SS AUSTRAL ENDURANCE, under authority of his Merchant Mariner's Document did, at or about 1210 on 1 July 1979, while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully commit an assault and battery without legal cause, provocation, or justification upon the person of one Phillip MOULIC, causing serious and severe bodily harm to him. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses, and two documents. In defense Appellant testified and introduced into evidence two documents.Appeal No. 2209Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19805/20/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2210 - HARRISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 February 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, on 10 January 1979, suspended the captioned documents for a period of one month on probation for a period of six months upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard BERING SEAL, under authority of the captioned documents, did, from on or about 1 December to 22 December 1978, wrongfully operate the vessel without the complement of crew required by the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, in that he did not have the required number of able seamen aboard. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and four documents. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of a witness and testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2210Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19805/20/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2211 - DUNCANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator on board the tug KATHRYNE E. MCALLISTER, under authority of the license above captioned, at or about 0100, 28 November 1978, Appellant failed to navigate said vessel and its tow, the tank barge CIBRO PHILADELPHIA, with due caution, resulting in the grounding of CIBRO PHILADELPHIA on Mill Rock, East River, N.Y., and the subsequent discharge of 942 barrels of #2 oil into the East River. The hearing was held at New York, New York, in four sessions during March and April, 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2211Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/22/19805/22/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2212 - LAWSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months outright, plus a further suspension for six months on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification alleged that while serving as Ordinary Seaman on board SS AMERICAN LIBERTY under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 29 March 1979, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter a member of the crew, Luis A. Lopez, Z-819 077. The lesser included offense of wrongfully engaging in mutual combat with a member of the crew was found proved. The hearing was held at New York, after a change of venue from Savannah, Georgia, on 4, 6, and 25 April 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2212Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19805/23/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2213 - RAINESThis appeal has ben taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 20 February 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after a hearing at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 12 February 1979, revoked Appellant's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as wiper aboard SS SAN ANTONIO, under authority of the captioned document, did, on 6 September 1977, while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully assault and batter with his fists a member of the crew, Harold C. Wolfe. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence two documents, including a copy of four pages of the official logbook of SS SAN ANTONIO. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence two certificates of discharge from vessels on which Appellant sailed subsequent to his discharge from SS SAN ANTONIO. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge entered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification as alleged had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation. The decision was served on 3 March 1979. Appeal was timely filed on 28 March 1979.Appeal No. 2213Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19805/23/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2214 - CHRISTENSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 March 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard after a hearing on 10 January 1978 at Portland, Maine, suspended Appellant's license for a period of one (1) month on probation for twelve (12) months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The first specification of negligence found proved alleged that while serving as operator aboard M/V BOBBIE under the authority of his license, Appellant did, on 14 December 1977 while said vessel was navigating Merchant Row, near Deer Island, Maine, in conditions of fog and restricted visibility, fail to obtain or properly use information available to determine the precise location of the vessel, causing the vessel to ground. The second specification of negligence found proved alleged that while serving as above Appellant failed to properly post a lookout, contributing to the vessel's grounding. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and two documents. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence his own testimony and one document.Appeal No. 2214Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2216 - SORENSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 April 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as pilot on board the SS CHANCELLORSVILLE under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 9 December 1978, Appellant failed to navigate with caution in the vicinity of Courthouse Point, Maryland, thereby resulting in said vessel running around. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 24, 25 January, and 8, 14 and 15 February 1979. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2216Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2217 - QUINNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for 6 months on 12 month's probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specification of negligence found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the M/V PANTHER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 25 April 1979, Appellant did, while said vessel was navigating on the Intercoastal Waterway at Hillsboro Inlet, Florida, fail to safely navigate said vessel in such a manner as to preclude the barges she was pushing from colliding with the Helen S. Marina, the F/V HELEN S, and various other vessels moored at the Helen S. Marina. The specification of misconduct found proved alleges that while serving as operator of the M/V PANTHER, Appellant did, on or about 24 April 1979 wrongfully operate the M/V PANTHER as master of said vessel without having endorsed the vessel's Certificate of Registry as required by 46 U.S.C. 40. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 10 and 11 July 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and each specification.Appeal No. 2217Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2218 - LASKIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 April 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Master on board SS TRANSINDIANA under authority of the license above captioned, on 11 October 1978, Appellant wrongfully failed to navigate with due caution as the burdened vessel by failing to keep out of the way of SS ROBERT E. LEE in a crossing situation, in violation of Rules 15 and 16 of the International Rules of the Road. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 6 February 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2218Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19806/4/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2219 - BUFORDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Galveston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months, plus three months on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Cook on board SS MERRIMAC under authority of the seaman's document above captioned, on or about 30 April 1978, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a member of the crew by throwing hot soup upon him, causing the crewmember to suffer an injury. The hearing was held at Galveston, Texas, on 2 June 1978. The hearing was held in absentia when the Appellant did not show up at the time and place of the hearing. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the following pieces of documentary evidence: (a) Affidavit of Service and Recitation of Rights, (b) Certification of Shipping Articles, (c) certified photocopy of page 39 of the Official Log of the SS MERRIMAC of April 30, 1978, (d) signed statement of Ricky Carter, (e) signed statement of Clinton Cleveland, (f) signed statement of Juan Oguendo, and (g) signed statement of Bert Winfield. The Investigating Officer did not introduce any live witnesses.Appeal No. 2219Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/16/19806/16/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2220 - LAMBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, after a hearing at Baltimore, Maryland, on 8, 24, and 25 May 1979, ordered Appellant admonished upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard tug NANTICOKE, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on 15 February 1979, while said vessel was under his command, knowingly transit the Nanticoke River with the barge DEBORAH from Seaford, Delaware, to Nanticoke River Buoy No. 4 (LLP 410), in violation of U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port of Baltimore order NR 05-79, during the hours of darkness, and without sufficient horsepower. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2220Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19806/12/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2221 - CERCYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 September 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator on board Motor Vessel TIGER STAR under authority of the license above captioned, on 4 August 1978, Appellant negligently fell asleep at the wheel, thereby contributing to a collision between TIGER STAR and a fixed platform. A second charge of misconduct was withdrawn at the outset of the proceeding. The hearing was held at New Orleans on 15, 22 and 29 August, and 8 September 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty of the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2221Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19806/12/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2222 - FIOCCAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 October 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The six specifications of misconduct found proved allege that while serving as Boatswain on board SS MORMACWAVE under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) on or about 11 January 1979, failed to perform his duties; (2) on 12 January 1979, failed to perform his regularly assigned duties by being absent from the vessel from 0800 to 1200 and from 1300 to 1700 without sufficient cause; (3) on 22 January 1979, failed to perform his duties in that he was absent from the vessel 0830 to 1200 and from 1300 to 1700 without proper permission; (4) on 23 January 1979, failed to perform his regularly assigned duties from 0800 to 1200 and from 1300 to 1700 without proper permission; (5) on 24 January 1979, failed to obey a lawful order in that when asked by the Master if he would obey orders, he indicated to the master that he would not obey orders; and (6) on 24 January 1979, failed to obey a lawful order of the Chief Mate in that when ordered to appear before the Master to have a log entry read to him, he refused and sent the Chief Mate a note which said, "Drop Dead. the X Bosin."Appeal No. 2222Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/21/19807/21/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2223 - HEWITTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 4 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, suspended Appellant's documents for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while acting under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 May 1979, Appellant wrongfully and fraudulently executed a false application for a raise in grade of his licensed to Master by certifying that he had not made application for a license and been rejected within twelve months. A second specification concerning an unfair practice allegedly occurring on 26 April 1979 in New York was dismissed. The hearing was held at Baltimore on 12 June 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence three documents.Appeal No. 2223Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2224 - HUGHESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1 By order dated 14 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's documents outright for three months, plus three additional months for violation of probation imposed in a prior proceeding, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Pilot on board the M/V CHIGUSA MARU under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 6 July 1979, while said vessel was enroute from San Francisco Bay to Pittsburgh, California, Appellant: (1) failed to maintain control of said vessel, resulting in its grounding; and (2) failed to maintain control of said vessel, resulting in a collision with and destruction of an established U.S. aid to navigation. The hearing was held at San Francisco on 27 September and 3, 4, 5, and 31 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2224Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2225 - LAWRENCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 March 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida , after a hearing at Cleveland, Ohio, on 14 February 1979, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard M/V SAM LAUD, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on or about 14 January 1979, while said vessel was in the port of Cleveland, Ohio, wrongfully fail to give notice of a marine casualty involving his vessel to the nearest Marine Inspection Office of the Coast Guard, to wit, Marine Safety Office, Cleveland, Ohio. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The investigation Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2225Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2226 - DAVISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the SS DELTA NORTE under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 6 August 1979, Appellant wilfully disobeyed a lawful order given him by the Chief Mate; to wit, he failed to complete stripping the vessel's logbook before going ashore. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 3 October 1979, 7 November 1979, and 6 December 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of the Chief Mate of the SS DELTA NORTE and two pieces of documentary evidence: (a) certified extract from Shipping Articles of SS DELTA NORTE (10 ex 2), (b) a copy of logbook entry of SS DELTA NORTE (10 ex 4). In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and a letter from Baker-Lyman Co., Inc. dated 15 October 1979.Appeal No. 2226Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/29/19807/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2227 - MANDLYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United Stated Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for 3 months on 12 months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Chief Officer on board the SS AUSTRAL ENDURANCE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 June 1978, Appellant failed to properly supervise maintenance work being performed on the starboard lifeboat gear and that this failure to supervise led to an injury being suffered by Cadet Edward Coll. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 15 June and 16, 23 and 24 July 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2227Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/30/19807/30/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2228 - DAVISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after a hearing at Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 May and 2 August 1979, revoked the captioned document upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as able seaman aboard SS OVERSEAS ULLA, under authority of the above captioned document, did, on or about 15 May 1979, while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully assault and batter by beating with his fists a member of the crew, Lennie C. Jones; and (2) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did on or about 15 May 1979, wrongfully assault with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a pair of pliers, a member of the crew, Lennie C. Jones. Appellant did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, which was held in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence four documents and one deposition. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge entered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and both specifications as alleged had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation.Appeal No. 2228Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/13/19808/13/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2229 - KELLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 November 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for six months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved allege that while serving as master on board the United States M/V VINCENT TIBBETTS, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 August 1977, Appellant: (1) failed properly to navigate the vessel between Long Island and Portland Harbor, Maine, with a resultant grounding of the vessel on Cow Island; (2) did "fail to notify U.S. Coast Guard Personnel about the grounding on Cow Island on or about 10 August 1977", and (3) failed to maintain a proper-lookout. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine, on 17 August 1977.Appeal No. 2229Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/18/19808/18/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2230 - SOLLINEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Bach, California, suspended Appellant's documents for two months, on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that, while serving as First Assistant Engineer on board the SS KEYSTONE CANYOU under authority of the captioned documents on or about 23 August 1979, Appellant wrongfully engaged in mutual combat with crewmember Clarence Crocker by strikining him with his fists and shoving him, while the vessel was at sea. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 30 August and 13 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence three exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of five witnesses, including his own testimony.Appeal No. 2230Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/18/19808/18/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2231 - AUSTINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Day Maintenanceman aboard SS EXPORT BANNER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 August 1976, while said vessel was in the port of Brooklyn, New York, Appellant wrongfully had in his possession certain narcotics, to wit, marijuana and opium. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 24 July 1979, and in Boston on 14 August and 27-28 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigation Officer introduced in evidence nine documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and the testimony of seven other witnesses. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to him.Appeal No. 2231Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/16/19809/16/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2232 - MILLERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 November 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license outright for a period of six (6) months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The one specification of negligence found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Chief Engineer aboard SS LURLINE, under authority of his license, on or about 22 December 1977, failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the overfilling of fuel oil tanks and subsequent spilling of a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2232Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2233 - WALSHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 20 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Tankerman on board MORANIA 140 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 October 1979, Appellant, as person in charge of cargo loading, negligently allowed a cargo tank to overflow, spilling fuel oil on the deck of the barge and into Arthur Kill, a navigable water of the United States, by not monitoring the level in the tank after it had been secured. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 29 November 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documents, one of which comprised the stipulated testimony of an eyewitness to the event in question.Appeal No. 2233Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2234 - REIMANNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 7 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for two months, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board SS AVILA under authority of the license above captioned, at or about 0830, 19 June 1979, Appellant negligently failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the overfilling of Number 3 starboard tank and subsequent spilling of a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. The hearing was held at Embarcadero Center, Suite 310, San Francisco, California, on 27 July, 16 August, 20 August, 5 September, and 14 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and, in Appellant's absence from the first session, a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf.Appeal No. 2234Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2235 - RABRENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 November 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Pilot on board SS GULF TIGER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 August 1978, Appellant did, while inbound in Tampa Bay, Florida, wrongfully ground said vessel. A second specification, found not proved, alleged that while serving in the above capacity Appellant negligently piloted said vessel at excessive speed, thereby contributing to the grounding. The hearing was held at Tampa, Florida, on 22 November 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2235Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2236 - CLUFFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, suspended Appellant's United States Coast Guard First Class Pilot's License No. 457718 for 3 months on 12 month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot on board M/V MOSEL under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 2 March 1979, while the said vessel in the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, Appellant failed to navigate the vessel with due caution, thereby causing an allision between the raised heavy lift boom of the vessel and the Reedy Point Bridge. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 22 May 1979 and adjourned to 7 September 1979, on which date it was concluded. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2236Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/23/19812/23/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2237 - STRELICThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license number 388 977 and all other valid Coast Guard licenses issued to Appellant for three (3) months on twelve (12) month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board SS AMOCO CONNECTICUT, under authority of the license and document above captioned, on or about 20 December 1978, Appellant negligently failed to ensure that the vessel's position was fixed and plotted on a chart of the area, Narragansett Bay, which is a part of the navigable waters of the United States. The hearings were held at Providence, Rhode Island, on 16 January, 13 March, 22 May and 10 July 1979. At the hearings, Appellant was represented by counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence an Affidavit of Service of the Charge Sheet; Charts of Narragansett Bay (No. 13223), Martha's Vineyard (No. 13218), and Providence River (No. 13224); the testimony of LT William J. Morani; the deposition of Francis J. Smith, Second Mate; and log entries of the AMOCO CONNECTICUT for 19 and 20 December 1978.Appeal No. 2237Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/26/19812/26/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2238 - MONTGOMERYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and Title 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 March 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Electrician on board SS MORMACARGO under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 29 October 1979, Appellant had in his possession a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 20 December 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and four documents.Appeal No. 2238Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/4/19813/4/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2239 - VINCENTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g), and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 August 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months, plus six months on twelve month's probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Fireman/Watertender on board SS AFRICAN DAWN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 8 May 1978, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter with his hand the Third Assistant Engineer. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 22, 23 and 27 June 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of the Third Assistant Engineer and two pieces of documentary evidence: a certified abstract of line 31 of the shipping articles for SS AFRICAN DAWN, and a certified copy of pages 21 and 22 of the vessel's official logbook.Appeal No. 2239Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/23/19813/23/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2179 - COOPERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 December 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after a hearing at New York, New York, on 8 and 26 September and 3 and 18 October 1977, revoked Appellant's document upon finding him guilty of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant was convicted on 22 February 1977, in the criminal court of the City of New York, a court of record, of a violation of the Narcotic Drug Laws of the State of New York, to wit, section 220.03 of the Penal Law of the State of New York. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence four documents. Appellant offered no evidence in defense. On 8 December 1977, the Administrative Law Judge entered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification as alleged had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation.Appeal No. 2179Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19801/3/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2180 - METCALFEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him incompetent for service as a seaman. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS AMERICAN EAGLE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 January 1978, Appellant, while the vessel was in the port of Portland, Maine, suffered from a "seizure". The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 30 January and 11 April 1978. At the hearing, Appellant failed initially to appear but when granted a reopening of the case elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of witnesses and medical records. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of two witnesses. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2180Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/8/19801/8/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2181 - BURKEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 February 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, on various dates between 31 May 1977 and 6 January 1978, revoked the captioned documents upon finding Appellant mentally incompetent. The original specification of mental incompetence found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as second mate aboard SS MISSOURI, on or about 3 November 1973, while the vessel was at sea, was, and presently is, mentally incompetent to perform the duties for which he holds a license and document issued by the Coast Guard. This hearing was conducted pursuant to the order of the National Transportation Safety Board No. EM-51, 2 NTSB 2784(1976). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2181Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/11/19802/11/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2182 - WILLIAMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 48 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 2 August 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after a hearing at Boston, Massachusetts, on 31 May 1977, revoked Appellant's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The four specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant while serving as Pumpman aboard SS AMERICAN EAGLE, under authority of the captioned document, was, on or about 12 and 13 May 1977, under the influence of liquor on board said vessel while at sea; (2) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did on or about 12 and 13 May 1977, disobey a lawful order of the Master of said vessel, to wit, ship's standing order number 7; (3) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did, on or about 12 May 1977, place his hand on the "private parts" of cremember Cadet James Doherty; and (4) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did on or about 12 May 1977, make lewd and obscene comments to a crewmember, Cadet James Doherty. Appellant did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, which was held in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses, and eight documents. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge and all specification as alleged had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation. The decision was served on 28 November 1977. Appeal was timely filed on 8 December 1977.Appeal No. 2182Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19802/22/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2183 - FAIRALLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(G) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 April 1978, and administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of two specification of the charge of misconduct. The two specifications of misconduct found proved allege that Appellant, while serving aboard the SS MAYAGUEZ under authority of the above captioned document, (1) did, on 6 February 1977, wrongfully use foul and abusive language towards a superior officer, the Chief Mate, and (2) did, on 18 February 1977, while said vessel was in the Port of Keelung, Taiwan, wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Mate, by kicking him repeatedly. At the hearing, appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence eight document including the depositions of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered the testimony of three witnesses, including his own. Subsequent to the hearing the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in open hearing in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation.Appeal No. 2183Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/21/19802/21/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2268 - HANKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 September 1980, an Administrative Law judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for two months, and further suspended his documents for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Operator onboard the tug DOMAR CAPTAIN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 21 June 1980, Appellant failed to insure that the barge DOMAR 118 was properly secured for sea, and on or about 21-27 June 1980, failed to adequately check the DOMAR 118 while he had it on a 1500 to 1800 foot tow. The specifications allege that both failures contributed to the sinking of the DOMAR 118 and subsequent oil pollution into the navigable waters of the United States on 27 June 1980. The hearing was held at Tampa, Florida, on 4 August 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2268Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/3/198112/3/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2271 - HAMILTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 February 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved in part alleged that while serving as Chief Cook on board SS TEXACO MARYLAND under authority of the document above captioned, on or about November 24, 1979, Appellant, while said vessel was proceeding to anchorage in New York Harbor, did wrongfully assault and batter with a potentially dangerous weapon, to wit: a stateroom metal trashcan, a member of the crew, Robert M. Jannah (also known as Robert I. Muhammed). The hearing was held at Corpus Christi, Texas, on 20 January 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2271Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/2/19823/2/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2273 - SILVERMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 July, 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's United States Coast Guard Merchant Mariner's Document No. [REDACTED]-D3 for six months outright plus an additional period of six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of two specifications of misconduct, assault and battery and disobedience of a lawful order. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Fireman/Watertender onboard SS JOHN LYKES, under authority of the captioned document Appellant did, on or about 18 February 1980, assault and battery the Second Assistant Engineer, and on or about 11 February 1980 did fail to obey a lawful order of the Second Assistant Engineer by changing fuel oil strainers in the engine room without permission. A second specification of failure to obey an order was found not proved. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, in seven sessions between 5 May 1980 and 3 July 1980.Appeal No. 2273Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/8/19824/8/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2240 - PALMERThis review has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 April 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Able Seaman on board S.S. THOMAS JEFFERSON under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 21 February 1980, Appellant did, while the vessel was in the port of Rotterdam, wrongfully assault and batter with a bottle a shipmate, Erick H. Sorensen, AB, Z-[REDACTED]-DI. The hearing was held at San Francisco on 21 April 1980. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered in his behalf in accordance with 46 CFR 5.20-75, and the hearing proceeded in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2240Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/1/19814/1/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2245 - ROBINSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 February 1980, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after hearings at New York, New York, on 29 November and 18 December 1978, and on 24 January, 14 February, 14 March, 9 May, 4 and 27 June, 9 and 16 July, 17 August, 19 September, and 7, 19 and 26 November 1979, revoked the captioned document upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct proved, alleges that Appellant, while serving as Fireman/Watertender aboard USNS ANDREW MILLER, under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document, did, at or about 2400, 12 March 1975, at Yokosuka, Japan, while said was in the port of Yokosuka, Japan, wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics to wit, heroin. Appellant appeared and was represented by counsel. No formal arraignment was held and no plea appears on the record of any of the hearings. It is clear that the proceedings were conducted as if a "not guilty" plea had been entered. Appellant was fully advised of the charges and specifications against him and of his rights. As in Decision on Appeal No. 867, there was no prejudice to Appellant because the hearing was conducted as though a plea of "not guilty" had been entered.Appeal No. 2245Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/29/19814/29/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2251 - FADLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The one specification found proved alleges that while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 5 August 1970, Appellant was convicted by the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of New York, a court of record, for violation of Section 220.05 of the Penal Law of the State of New York, for criminal possession of a dangerous drug, to wit; Hashish. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 25 July 1980. Appellant did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, which was held in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documents.Appeal No. 2251Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2215 - RILEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 January 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, on 29 November 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of one month on probation for three months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard GULF FLEET NO. 22, under authority of the captioned documents, did, from 10 to 24 November 1978, fail to comply with the manning requirements as set forth in the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, to wit: sailing without a licensed engineer and one able seaman. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of one witness and four documents.Appeal No. 2215Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2186 - ASCIONEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 August 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while serving as Ordinary Seaman on board SS SAN FRANCISCO under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 26 January 1978, Appellant wrongfully failed to join said vessel at the foreign port of Livorno, Italy. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 27 April, 16 May, 19 June, and 10 July 1978. Appellant was not present at the hearing which proceeded in absentia, nor was he represented by counsel. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification on behalf of the Appellant. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four documents: (1) an abstract of line 16 of the shipping articles of the SS SAN FRANCISCO for the voyage beginning on 25 November 1977 certified by CDR P.M. Lebet, USCG at Rotterdam, Holland; (2) an abstract of the same line 16 certified by LTJG J.A. Stamm, USCG supplying the date, place and cause of the Appellant's leaving the vessel; (3) a copy of an entry from the official log book of the SS SAN FRANCISCO certified under the hand and seal of the American Vice Consul at Kobe, Japan; and (4) a photocopy of page 23 of the official log book of the SS SAN FRANCISCO for the same voyage certified by LTJG Stamm which includes the entry certified in the third document. There was no live testimony introduced by the Investigating Officer. The Appellant offered no evidence in his defense.Appeal No. 2186Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19802/22/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2187 - CASTLEBERRYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 13 April 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able seaman on board SS SANTA MARIANA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 8 December 1978, Appellant wrongfully had in his possession at San Francisco, California, a quantity of cocaine. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, from 22 May to 15 June 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and certain documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 14 August 1979. Appeal was timely filed and perfected.Appeal No. 2187Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/25/19802/25/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2188 - GILLIKINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after a hearing at New York, New York, on 16 March and 31 March 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of three (3) months on probation for twelve (12) months upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The one specification of inattention to duty found proved alleged that while serving as master aboard TS PRINCESS BAY, Appellant did, on or about 3 November 1977, while said vessel was transferring gasoline at the Phillips Fuel Company, Hackensack, New Jersey, and while acting as the person in charge of the transfer operation, wrongfully fail to provide flame screens or proper supervision for open cargo tank hatches as required by 46 Code of Federal Regulations 35.30-10. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of one witness, three documents, and a series of four color photographs depicting PRINCESS BAY. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence his own testimony.Appeal No. 2188Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/27/19802/27/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2190 - RITOLAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States code 239(g) and Title 46 code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 February 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license for one month with an additional period of six months' suspension on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The three specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Third Mate on board the United States Army Corps of Engineers Dredge CHESTER HARDING, under the authority of the above captioned license, on or about 12 December 1976, Appellant failed to sound a whistle signal in reply to the whistle signal of M/V DON CARLOS; failed to execute a port passage with DON CARLOS in the absence of an agreement on a starboard passing; and failed to indicate the intent of his vessel while approaching DON CARLOS, the first two specifications further alleging that the failure cited contributed to a collision between the two vessels. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written opinion in which he concluded that the charge and specifications had been proved. He then entered an order suspending Appellant's license for one month with an additional six month period of suspension on twelve months' probation. The entire decision was served on 16 February 1979. Appeal was timely filed and perfected.Appeal No. 2190Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/25/19803/25/198012/21/2017
Page 12 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.