CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2072 - HOPKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 5.31-1. By order dated 21 October 1975 and amended on 7 November 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for a period of twelve months, after hearing held at Baltimore, Maryland, over a period from 8 October 1974 to 21 July 1975. The specifications found proved alleged as follows: FIRST SPECIFICATION: In that you, being the holder of the captioned document did on or about 3 August 1973, at Baltimore, Maryland, knowingly and wrongfully, while occupying the position of Dean of Administration of the Maritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies, provide Captain Thomas F. O'Callaghan with a false document, which document as you well knew, falsely stated that Captain O'Callaghan has successfully completed the course of instruction indicated on the face thereof; to wit, a Maritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies' Certificate of Advanced Training Collision Avoidance Radar, dated 26 January 1973; with knowledge that the said document could be used by Captain O'Callaghan to obtain, from the United States Coast Guard, a radar endorsement to his master's license.Appeal No. 2072Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/15/19769/15/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2073 - SCHUESSLERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1 and 3. By order dated 20 November 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for one month outright plus two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of the charge of "inattention to duty" while acting as a pilot of a steam vessel. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a pilot on board the S.S. SKUKUZA (South Africa) on or about 19 July 1975, Appellant failed to insure that the attending M/V J. HARRIS MASTERSON was clear before maneuvering his vessel ahead in the Houston Ship Channel, thereby causing a collision with the M/V J. HARRIS MASTERSON. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and ten exhibits.Appeal No. 2073Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/15/19769/15/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2074 - LOWENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 August 1975, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked the radar observer endorsement issued to Appellant and suspended his licenses for a period of six months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 August 1973, Appellant did wrongfully and knowingly obtain from the United States Coast Guard, at Coast Guard Marina Inspection Office, Baltimore, Maryland, a renewal of a radar endorsement to his Master's license No. 441494, through the presentation of a false document attesting to his satisfactory completion of the Radar Safety and Navigation Course at the Maritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies, which course he had in truth and in fact not satisfactorily completed; the false document concerned being, Maritime Institute of Technology and Graduate Studies' Certificate of Advanced Training Collision Avoidance Radar, dated 26 January 1973, which document, if valid, would have lawfully entitled him to said endorsement under the authority of 46 CFR 10.02-9(a) (5).Appeal No. 2074Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19769/20/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2075 - BOYLESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United Stated Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 March 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of The United States Coast Guard at Anchorage, Alaska, suspended Appellant's seaman document for one month outright plus two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Tankerman on board the Barge 17, Official No. 268 871 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 4 March 1976, Appellant failed to take adequate precautions to prevent cumulated oil on the deck of the barge from entering the navigable waters of the United States by allowing the oil to drain off the stern of the barge. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of five witnesses, and four exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence testimony of two witnesses, and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2075Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19769/20/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2076 - OGERONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 November 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that while under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 24 August 1972, Appellant was convicted by the Harris County District Court No. 184, Texas, a court of record, for violation of the narcotic drug laws of the State of Texas, to wit, possession of heroin. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits which included certified copies of the indictment by the Harris County Grand Jury charging Appellant with possession of heroin and the judgment finding Appellant guilty of that charge.Appeal No. 2076Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19769/20/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2077 - FARMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 January 1969 a Hearing Examiner, (now Administrative Law Judge) of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a fireman/watertender on board the United States SS YOUNG AMERICA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 11 August 1967, Appellant was wrongfully and unlawfully in possession of marijuana, a legally defined narcotic drug. Appellant did not enter an appearance at the hearing, after due notice of the time and place thereof. The Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification in Appellant's behalf. Appellant was not represented by counsel, but had been notified of his right to such representation.Appeal No. 2077Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/24/19769/24/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2078 - MCCOYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 31 March 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a third assistant engineer on board the United States SS DELTA MAR under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 20 January 1976, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties due to being under the influence of intoxicants. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduce in evidence entries from the.shipping articles and the official log as well as the testimony of the Chief Engineer. In defense, Appellant did not offer any evidence although he did testify concerning his sailing record.Appeal No. 2078Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/23/19769/23/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2079 - SHEPARDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 December 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot on board the M/V FRANK D. MOORES (Brit.) being the holder of the license above captioned, on or about 16 July 1975, Appellant did imprudently navigate said vessel in heavy fog causing the vessel to collide with a fixed object, to wit, the Mount Hope Bridge, Mount Hope Bay, Rhode Island. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduce in evidence the testimony of seven witnesses, and six exhibits.Appeal No. 2079Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/27/19769/27/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2080 - FULTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 18 July 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the SS NOTRE DAME VICTORY under authority of the license and document above captioned, on 30 Jaunuary 1975, Appellant did hazard his vessel by proceeding up the Delaware River in an unsafe manner without assistance of tugboats when the vessel's ship's service generator was inoperable and the portable 500 kw generator was operating in an unreliable manner and there were no immediate backup ship's service generating capabilities. A second charge concerning an improper logging was dismissed. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2080Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/8/197610/8/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2081 - BAILEY.PDFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 21 June 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for six months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) While serving aboard the SEATRAIN MARYLAND as a Fireman/Watertender, (a) on 7 February 1969, wrongfully failed to join his vessel on its departure from Sattahip, Thailand. (2) While serving aboard the SS RAPHAEL SEMMES as a Fireman/Watertender, (a) on 9 April 1969, Appellant wrongfully failed to join his vessel on its departure from Qui Nhon, South Viet Nam; (b) on 9 May 1969, Appellant was wrongfully absent from his vessel and duties; and (c) on 20 June 1969, turned over the last hour of his 2000 to 2400 port watch to another crew member without authority and was thereafter absent from his vessel and duties. Appellant then failed to stand his 0800 to 1200 sea watch on 21 June 1969.Appeal No. 2081Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/27/197610/27/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2082 - JOHNSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 2 June 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an able seaman on board the United States SS PRESIDENT MCKINLEY under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 23 December 1975, Appellant without provocation committed wrongful assault and battery with his fists upon the vessel's Boatswain. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and one specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and one specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision and order was served on 2 June 1676.Appeal No. 2082Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/28/197610/28/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2083 - SYBIAKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 13 February 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Third Mate on board the SS TRENTON under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 20 January 1975, Appellant (1) wrongfully failed to perform his duties by reason of being under the influence of liquor; and (2) wrongfully failed to perform his duties by departing his station to wit: the engine order telegraph which was the duly appointed station. The hearing was held pursuant to the in absentia regulations. A plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification was entered by the Judge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of LCDR Larry J. Balok with respect to what transpired on 24 January 1975 when the charge and specifications were preferred.Appeal No. 2083Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/28/197610/28/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2084 - WARRENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 February 1976 an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 8 months outright plus 4 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Second Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS AMERICAN LEADER under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 21 July 1975, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a fellow crewmember. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence three exhibits and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2084Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197611/9/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2085 - RICHARDSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 March 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the SS VANTAGE HORIZON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 14 December 1975, Appellant, while navigating on Chesapeake Bay, during conditions of fog and restricted visibility did wrongfully fail to obtain or properly use information available to him from radar observations to determine the course and speed of another vessel detected in his vicinity. A second part of the specification found not proved and stricken from the specification prior to Appellant's case in chief was that the error contributed to a collision between his vessel and M/V DAEYANG PROSPERITY. A second specification alleging that Appellant did wrongfully fail to navigate his vessel with caution was found not proved. A third specification alleging that Appellant did wrongfully fail to navigate his vessel at a moderate speed was also found not proved.Appeal No. 2085Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/24/197611/24/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2086 - ERIKSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 April 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license and all other documents for 1 month outright plus 2 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the United States M/V PIONEER under authority of the license above described, on or about 27 January 1976, Appellant "did wrongfully lose control of (the) vessel's tow, the barge `BARGE 412', allowing it to collide with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' survey boat CARLSON moored at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Depot Dock, Hutchinson Island," Savannah, Georgia. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2086Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/3/197612/3/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2087 - MOURIKISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 January 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for one month outright plus one month on three months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Master on board the SS CONNECTICUT under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 15 June 1975, Appellant did neglect to take the necessary precautious required by the ordinary practice of seamen (Article 29, Inland Rules of the Road), to wit: attempt to navigate a light vessel in a restricted channel during unfavorable weather, thereby causing a collision with the (Liberian) M/V ST PANTELEIMON, in the Houston Ship Channel, at Robertson Terminal, Galena Park, Texas. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2087Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/17/197612/17/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2088 - SORIANOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 July 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle Washington suspended Appellant's license no. 442 203 for six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of violation of a statute. The specification found proved alleges that as President of Swiftsure, Inc., owner of M/V MARLIN, O.N. 568 721, an uninspected vessel, on or about 24 January 1976, Appellant specifically directed the master of said vessel to get underway from Seattle, Washington, wrongfully carrying freight for hire in willful violation of 46 U.S.C. 367 and 404. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence with the approval of Appellant and his counsel a stipulation of fact (T-7). See CG Exhibit 1.Appeal No. 2088Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19771/3/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2089 - STEWARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 March 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Washington, North Carolina revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of "conviction for a narcotic drug violation." The specification found proved alleges that while being the holder of the above captioned document, on or about 15 December 1975 Appellant was convicted of a violation of North Carolina General Statue 90-95(a'(3)) in the Superior Court of New Hanover County, State of North Carolina, for violation of a narcotic drug law. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a copy of the Judgement of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation entered in Cause No. 75-CR-14629 in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, County of New Hanover, North Carolina, dated December 15, 1975.Appeal No. 2089Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19771/3/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2090 - LONGINOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 214 and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 January 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for one month outright plus one month on three month's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as a pilot on board the SS CONNECTICUT, being holder of the document and license above captioned, on or about 15 June 1975, Appellant did neglect to take the necessary precautions required by the ordinary practice of seamen (Article 29, Inland Rules of the Road), to wit: attempt to navigate a light vessel in a restricted channel during unfavorable weather, thereby causing a collision with the (LIBERIAN) MV ST PANTELEIMON, in the Houston Ship Channel, at Robertson Terminal, Galena Park, Texas. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2090Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/19/19771/19/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2091 - ERNSERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 24 May 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's license for one month outright plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot on board the United States SS GULFKNIGHT under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 May 1975, Appellant, while navigating said vessel in Carquinez Strait, negligently allowed said vessel to collide with the Ozol pier, a properly charted fixed structure, in Martinez California. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses, as well as fourteen exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2091Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/31/19771/31/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2092 - KOKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 1 July 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Honolulu, Hawaii, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS OGDEN CHALLENGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13-18 August 1975, Appellant did wrongful use foul and disrespectful language and gestures to the Chief Officer, did wrongfully disobey a lawful order of the Chief Officer, did on three occasions wrongfully fail to perform regularly assigned duties, and did wrongfully fail to join his vessel upon her departure from Alexandria, Egypt, on 18 August 1975. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a certified extract from the Shipping Articles of the SS OGDEN CHALLENGER, excerpts of the Official Log Book and the Mate's Log Book, the depositions of the Master and Chief Mate of the vessel, and a copy of a message from the American Embassy of Cairo, Egypt.Appeal No. 2092Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/28/19771/28/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2093 - BOOHERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 April 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Corpus Christi, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman documents. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a wiper on board the United States SS OVERSEAS ANCHORAGE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 December 1975, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a fellow crew member, Donald Gusis, with a deadly weapon, to wit, a pipe, while the vessel was at Novorossiysk, USSR. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of the SS OVERSEAS ANCHORAGE; an injury report concerning Mr. Gusis; sketches of the room occupied by Gusis and Booher; the weapon allegedly used; the testimony of the victim; and sworn statements of three crew members.Appeal No. 2093Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/28/19771/28/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2094 - MILLERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 May, 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as pilot on board the Norwegian SS BAUNE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 18 January 1974, Appellant committed several faults which led to a collision at Mile 6 AHP, Mississippi River, with SS KEY TRADER. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. A voluminous record of testimony, statements and exhibits was complied by the parties.Appeal No. 2094Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/7/19772/7/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2095 - SCOTTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 March 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 18 January 1972, Appellant was convicted by the Common Pleas Court of Auglaiza County, Ohio of possessing or having under his control an hallucinogen, to wit: cannabis, commonly known as marijuana, contrary to Section 3719.41 of the Revised Code of Ohio. Another specification concerning a narcotic drug law violation conviction by the County Court of Hamilton, New York on 18 September 1970 was found not proved because the copy of the conviction introduced in evidence had not been duly certified as required by 46 CFR 5.20-105(a). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. With respect to the Ohio conviction the Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a duly certified copy of the Journal Entry for Case No. 5278 filed 18 January 1972 in the Common Pleas Court of Auglaize County, Ohio. A duly certified copy of the indictment was also introduced.Appeal No. 2095Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/25/19772/25/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2096 - TAYLORThese appeals have been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By orders dated 8 May 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant Taylor's license for three months and Appellant Wood's license for nine months upon findings each guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as master and pilot, respectively, on board SS KEYTRADER under authority of the respective license above captioned, on or about 18 January 1974, Appellants' wrongfully initiated a starboard to starboard passing with SS BAUNE, contributing to a collision with that vessel, and failed to navigate KEYTRADER with caution, after proposing a starboard to starboard passing by whistle and radio, receiving no agreement, and failing to slow down.Appeal No. 2096Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/28/19772/28/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2097 - TODDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 May 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Mobile, Alabama suspended Appellant's seaman document for 6 months outright plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an Oiler on board the United States SS JAMES LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 October 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully failed to obey a lawful order of the vessel's Third Assistant Engineer; (2) wrongfully struck the Third Assistant Engineer; and, (3) wrongfully struck the Chief Engineer. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2097Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/7/19773/7/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2098 - CORDISHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 5 May 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Engineer Cadet on board the United States SS CHRISTOPHER LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 11 February 1976, Appellant wrongfully refused to obey a lawful command of the ship's master. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Judge reserved decision. He subsequently served a written order suspending all documents, issued to Appellant, for a period of 6 months on 12 months' probation. The entire decision and order was served on 10 May 1976.Appeal No. 2098Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/18/19773/18/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2099 - HOLDERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 July 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months outright plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while serving as an "oiler" on board the United States SS MORMACPRIDE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 17-18 October 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully failed to perform his duties from 2000 to 2400 hours due to intoxication while the vessel was in the port of New York, (2) wrongfully failed to properly perform his duties from 0800 to 0830 hours by making false entries in the engine room oiler's log sheet while the vessel was at sea, and (3) wrongfully assaulted and battered a licensed officer, to wit, the Third Assistant Engineer, C. Ferneza, with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a clipboard, while the vessel was at sea. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2099Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2100 - COLEMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 July, 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license for one month outright plus two months on four months's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Engineer on board the United States SS AMERICAN EAGLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 19 February 1976, Appellant was negligent in his duties, which resulted in a spillage of fuel oil into Corpus Christi Harbor, Coastal States Petrochemical Company Dock, Nueces County, Texas, to wit: allowing the starboard settling tank to overflow. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and pertinent documentary materials.Appeal No. 2100Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2101 - KELLOGGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 April 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's licenses for 3 months outright plus 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master on board the United States SS EDGAR M. QUEENY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 31 January 1975, Appellant did not have "a competent person standing by in position to let the anchor go promptly as the vessel was maneuvering in congested waters," and that Appellant did "wrongfully fail to take positive action in sufficient time to prevent a collision with the SS CORINTHOS." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2101Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2102 - GABLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license and Merchant Marine documents for two months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of the charge of "negligence." The specification found proved alleges that while serving as First Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS EAGLE LEADER, under authority of the license and document above captioned, the Appellant "did on or about 18 March 1976 at approximately 1600 negligently energize the feedback circuit breaker on the generator switchboard thereby allowing 440 volts A.C. power from the emergency generator to flow to the main switchboard in the engine room creating a dangerous arc, all the while knowing that the main switchboard was disabled from an electrical casualty the day before and that engineering personnel were working in the vicinity of the main switchboard making a survey of the damage."Appeal No. 2102Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2103 - SNELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 27 October 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found alleges that Appellant, being the holder of the captioned document, was convicted on 8 May 1972 of a violation of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act of the State of Washington in King County Superior Court, a court of record, for possession and sale of a narcotic drug, to wit, heroin. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence various documentary evidence.Appeal No. 2103Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19775/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2104 - BENSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's license for 2 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while serving as a crewmember on board the M/V Thomas C.L. NUGENT while holding license above captioned, on or about 27 August 1976, Appellant wrongfully discharged oily bilge slops into the navigable waters of the United States, to wit, the Ohio River near Mile 572.0, causing a sheen upon the water's surface, a violation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public Law 92-500 (86 Stat. 816). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. No evidence was introduced.Appeal No. 2104Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19775/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2105 - BROWNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 21 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman document for 8 months outright plus 4 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Able Seaman/Quartermaster on board the United States SS GULFQUEEN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 6 March 1976, Appellant wrongfully committed assault and battery upon another member of the crew with his fists and a metal bucket. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by nonprofessional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.Appeal No. 2105Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/7/19776/7/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2106 - CARDWELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's license and other seaman's documents for two months subject to six months probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator and Person-in-Charge on board the M/V THOMAS C.L. NUGENT under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 August 1976, Appellant wrongfully permitted the discharge of oily bilge slops from that vessel in the navigable waters of the United States, to wit, the Ohio River near Mile 572.0, causing a sheen upon the water's surface, a violation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public Law 92-500 (86 Stat. 816). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2106Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/12/19779/12/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2107 - HARRISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Chicago admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS MORMACRIGEL under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 25 May 1976, Appellant "did... wrongfully fail to turn to, while said vessel was undocking from the port of Recife, Brazil." At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence exhibits consisting of a certified extract of the Shipping Articles from the MORMACRIGEL, a certified extract from the ship's official log, certified copy of the relevant page of the log, and the Investigating Officer's comments and conclusions regarding the exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony as to the accuracy of the log entries and as to the circumstances surrounding the incident reported in the log.Appeal No. 2107Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/27/19776/27/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2108 - ROYSEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's operator's license for two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, serving as operator on board the MULTNOMAH under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 4 September 1976, while said vessel was underway on the Columbia River, crossed the upstream sill of the Bonneville Lock and Dam, entering the navigation lock chamber against a red light and without authorization to enter, in violation of 33 CFR 207.718(d)(3) and 207.718(c). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of five witnesses and six exhibits consisting of documentary evidence.Appeal No. 2108Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/29/19776/29/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2109 - SMITHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of possession of a narcotic drug. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Third Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS PRESIDENT JEFFERSON under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 12 August 1976, Appellant was wrongfully in possession of heroin. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of four witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence one exhibit.Appeal No. 2109Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/18/19777/18/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2110 - WRETThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 27 January, 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months plus twelve months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a wiper on board the United States SS BALDBUTTE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 6 December 1976, Appellant assaulted and battered the chief engineer of the vessel with a crescent wrench, at Los Angeles, California. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents, photographs, and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and that of a witness.Appeal No. 2110Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19779/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2111 - JENSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 January 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after hearing held at Port Arthur, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for two months plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as chief mate on board the United States SS TEXACO NORTH DAKOTA under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 2 and 3 October 1973, Appellant wrongfully failed to supervise the tank cleaning operations in progress which produced a combustible gas mixture accumulation in the after pumproom resulting in an explosion and fire while said vessel was underway in the Gulf of Mexico. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2111Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19779/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2112 - HOMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States Tug HUDSON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 23 August 1976, Appellant navigated his tow in a negligent manner such as to cause his tow to come in contact with the Long Island Bridge. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence CG Form 2692 Tug HUDSON, O.N. 249639, C.G. Form 2692 - Crane BARGE NO. 6, and a copy of U. S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey Chart No. 13270 39th Ed., 1 March 1975 of Boston Harbor. LT William MILLER, USCG, the casualty investigation officer, testified for the Investigating Officer.Appeal No. 2112Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/14/197711/14/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2113 - HINDSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's seaman's licenses for 1 month outright plus 2 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master/First Class Pilot on board the United States SS SPARTAN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 12 August 1976, Appellant: (1) wrongfully failed to obtain or properly use information available from radar observations, for the purpose of determining the safe course into Ludington Harbor, Michigan. (2) wrongfully failed to reduce the speed of his vessel during conditions of fog and restricted visibility.Appeal No. 2113Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/28/19782/28/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2114 - HULTZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 31 January 1977, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after hearing at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges in essence that while serving as operator of the tug H.C. JEFFERSON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 15 May 1976, Appellant endangered the lives of persons aboard a 16 foot pleasure craft in East Horseshoe Range, Delaware River, by proceeding at a speed excessive under the conditions, with a wake which caused the pleasure craft to be thrown against buoy #39. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and pleaded not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents and the testimony of two eyewitnesses who has been aboard the pleasure craft.Appeal No. 2114Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/1/19783/1/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2115 - CHRISTENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 August 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a messman on board the SS American Corsair under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 January 1971, Appellant: (1) wrongfully assaulted the saloon pantryman, Charles G. Pace, with intent to do harm by setting fire to his mattress while he was sleeping upon same; (2) wrongfully threatened to blow up the vessel, said vessel being the carrier of a cargo of military explosives; and (3) wrongfully lit matches on the main deck of said vessel with full knowledge that the vessel was carrying military explosives, and further, that said actions were deliberate. A fourth specification that Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties due to intoxication was found not proved. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2115Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/24/19783/24/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2116 - BAGGETTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 8 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a First Class Pilot on board the SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON under authority of the license captioned above, on or about 31 January 1976, Appellant failed to keep clear of overtaken vessels as required by the Inland Rules of the Road, thereby contributing to a collision between SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON, the tug D.T. SHERIDAN, and the barge SEA STAR. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and eighteen documentary exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, the testimony of seven witnesses and seven documentary exhibits.Appeal No. 2116Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19784/11/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2117 - AGUILARThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 March 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months outright plus twelve months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as AB seaman on board SS SANTA CLARA under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) at about 0315, 31 July 1976, at Cartagena, Colombia, wrongful fail to turn to for assigned undocking duties; (2) on 31 July 1976, at sea, wrongfully fail to performdutieson the 0400-0800 watch; (3) on 1 August 1976, at Cristobal, C.Z., wrongfully fail to turn to for undocking duties and to perform on the 1600-2000 watch. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of SANTA CLARA.Appeal No. 2117Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19784/11/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2118 - HEBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 22 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board the tank barge EXXON 267 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 July 1976, Appellant: wrongfully failed to properly supervise the transfer of bunker "C" oil to tank barge EXXON 267 at the Exxon facility at Chalmette, Louisiana, in that as person in charge he wrongfully failed to remain in the immediate vicinity of the transfer operation thereby contributing to the pollution of the Mississippi River, a navigable water of the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and one exhibit. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2118Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19784/11/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2119 - SMITHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 27 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a chief pumpman on board the United States SS AMERICAN EAGLE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 May 1977, Appellant wrongfully had in his possession marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the following documents: (1) Affidavit of Service of the Charges, (2) Copy of Form CG-735T, Master's Report of Seaman shipped or discharged, (3) Copy of Certificate of Discharge for Merchant Seaman to Ronald A. Smith, Sr., (4) Copy of Pay Voucher from American Eagle Tanker Corp., (5) Copies of Pages 37, 38, and 39 from the Official Logbook of the S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (not admitted) (6) Photo-copy of Page 42 of Official Logbook, S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (7) U.S. Customs Laboratory Report, (8) Chain of Custody for substance found on S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (9) Sworn Statement of Francis P. POWERS, Master, S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE, (10) Statement of Edward MALLON, Chief Officer, S.S. AMERICAN EAGLE. The chief engineer on board the SS AMERICAN EAGLE, Mr. James W. ECCLES, testified on behalf of the Investigating Officer.Appeal No. 2119Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/12/19784/12/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2120 - MCLAUGHLINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code, Section 239b, and Title 46, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Tampa, Florida, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that, while being the holder of the above captioned document, on or about 7 June 1974, Appellant was convicted of a violation of Florida Statute 893.13(1)(e) in the Circuit Criminal Justice Court of Hillsborough County, Florida, for violation of a narcotic drug law. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel, and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence a certified copy of the Judgement of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation entered in Case No. 74-445 in the Circuit Criminal Justice Court of Hillsborough County, Florida, dated 7 June 1974. Following the introduction of the court records, Appellant made a statement on his own behalf under oath. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2120Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/19/19784/19/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2121 - GIBBLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as ordinary seaman on board the United States SS ARCO PRESTIGE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 March 1977, Appellant, while the vessel was at sea did wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics, to wit, marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and seven exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and the testimony of one witness. On 11 May 1977 the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and the specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision and order was served on 14 May 1977.Appeal No. 2121Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19775/23/197712/21/2017
Page 12 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.