CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2017 - TROCHEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved allege that while serving as an oiler on board the United States SS ELIZABETHPORT under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 18 May 1973, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a knife, a member of the crew, Pedreu C. Lewis, while said vessel was at sea. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence shipping articles, entries from the official logbook, and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2017Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/11/19753/11/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2018 - GOODWINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, (now 5.30-1). By order dated 17 July 1974, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's license for 3 months outright plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V PIONEER under authority of the license above captioned, did from 28 April 1974 through 26 June 1974 wrongfully operate said vessel on forty-one occasions without a valid Certificate of Inspection. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a copy of the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, an Amendment to the Certificate of Inspection and a Temporary Certificate of Inspection.Appeal No. 2018Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/10/19753/10/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2019 - JONESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 8 February 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months outright plus three months on nine months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS HURRICANE under authority of the document above-captioned, on or about 24 January 1974, Appellant, while the vessel was underway in the Houston Ship Channel, did wrongfully assault and batter a member of the crew, Jimmy Garner. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and certain documentary evidence. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and that of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2019Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/11/19753/11/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2020 - JOYNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 22 July 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Tankerman on board the T/B OCEAN 80 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 25 October 1972, Appellant, while said vessel was moored in Carteret, New Jersey, was negligent in his duties in that, during cargo transfer operations, he left the said vessel unsupervised for a period in excess of 30 minutes. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the sworn testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2020Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/7/19754/7/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2021 - BURKEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 August 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him incompetent. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a second mate on board SS MISSOURI under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 3 November 1973, Appellant was, and at the time of hearing was still, mentally incompetent to perform the duties for which he held the license and documents issued by the Coast Guard. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records, the testimony of witnesses, given both in person and by deposition, and certain medical records.Appeal No. 2021Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/7/19755/7/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2022 - PALMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 6 May 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Third Mate on board the T/B IOS 3301 under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 19 February 1974, Appellant did wrongfully cause an oil spill into the navigable waters of the United States, the Houston Ship Channel, while said vessel was moored at Houston, Texas. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence a vessel inspection report and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2022Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/16/19755/16/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2023 - KOBERGERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1 (now 5.30-1). By order dated 11 January 1974, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman document for four months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Steward on board the United States SS AMERICAN CHIEFTAIN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 15 September 1973, Appellant did assault first Assistant Engineer Joseph Urei, Z-518662-D1, in the Officer' Pantry. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the vessel's log entry concerning the incident and the testimony of four witnesses.Appeal No. 2023Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19756/3/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2024 - KENNEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 8 October 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on 18 month's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the M/V VINEYARD QUEEN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 20 August 1974, Appellant did fail to determine the position of the vessel, thereby contributing to a grounding. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a chart, other documents, and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and affidavits concerning the operation of a foghorn.Appeal No. 2024Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19756/4/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2025 - ARMSTRONGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulation 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 12 September 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for one month on three months' probation and revoked his operator's license outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that, on or about 11 1973, Appellant wrongfully, knowingly, and fraudulently submitted and signed a false application for an original towboat operator's license at the USCG Marine Safety Office, Norfolk, Virginia, to wit: Appellant indicated on said application that he never had been convicted by any court including a military court, for any offense other than a minor traffic violation when in fact he had a past history of several major criminal convictions before different state courts. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2025Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19756/5/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2026 - CLARKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 March 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a bedroom utility (OBR) on board the United States SS PIONEER CONTRACTOR under authority of the document above captioned, between 7 December 1972 and 28 February 1973, Appellant was wrongfully a user of a narcotic drug. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing and after the Administrative Law Judge questioned the Investigating Officer concerning the circumstances surrounding service of charges and notice of the hearing a motion to proceed in absentia was granted. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to all charges and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and a certification of the applicable shipping articles.Appeal No. 2026Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19756/5/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2027 - WALKERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 13 November 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for three months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the M/V GLENDA S under authority of the license above described, on or about 13 August 1974, Appellant did wrongfully fail to navigate with due caution thus contributing to the collision between said vessel and tow and the Borden Chemical Docks at Geismar, Louisiana, Mile 184.8, Lower Mississippi River. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2027Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/26/19756/26/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2028 - CARTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 12 September 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license and seaman documents for 9 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a THIRD MATE on board the SS ST. LOUIS under authority of the document and license above captioned, Appellant did, FIRST on or about 7 November 1973 while said vessel was in the port of Singapore, wrongfully fail to perform his duties due to intoxication; SECOND, on or about 18 November 1973, while said vessel was in the port of Hong Kong, wrongfully fail to perform his duties due to intoxication. THIRD, on or about 19 November 1973, while said vessel was in the port of Hong Kong, wrongfully fail to obey an order of the Master by being under the influence of alcohol while on watch. FOURTH, on or about 19 November 1973, while said vessel was in the port of Hong Kong, wrongfully fail to perform his duties due to intoxication.Appeal No. 2028Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/27/19756/27/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2029 - CHAPMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 13 August 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an Operator on board the M/V ELLENA HICKS, under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did, on or about 30 December 1973, FIRST, wrongfully fail to post a proper lookout during low visibility, thereby contributing to a collision between his tow, the barge THELMA COLLINS, and the M/V NISSAN MARU, and SECOND, wrongfully fail to sound fog signals during low visibility, thereby contributing to a collision between his tow, the barge THELMA COLLINS, and the M/V NISSAN MARU.Appeal No. 2029Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/31/19757/31/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2030 - RIVERAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 30 December 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Pilot on board the SS DELAWARE GETTY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 29 August 1973, Appellant (1) Did imprudently navigate said vessel into Army Terminal Channel, Bahia de San Juan, Puerto Rico, under adverse conditions of trim and wind; and did fail to maintain control of said vessel which resulted in grounding; and (2) Did neglect and fail to navigate said vessel in a prudent manner which resulted in the sinking of Army Terminal Channel Light Buoy No. 6.Appeal No. 2030Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/21/19758/21/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2031 - CANNONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order 23 October 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for two months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the M/V ATCHISON, under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 20 August 1974, Appellant while said vessel was upbound on the Mississippi River in the vicinity of the Luling to Destrehan ferry crossing (1) did wrongfully fail to yield the right of way to the M/V GEORGE PRINCE which was crossing from his starboard side, thereby contributing to a collision with the M/V GEORGE PRINCE; and (2) did wrongfully fail to screen the sidelights on the lead barge of the tow as required by the applicable Rules of the Road. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the sworn testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2031Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/5/19759/5/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2032 - KAYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 31 October 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for two months outright plus four months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Chief Mate on board the United States SS TRANSHURON under authority of the license and document above captioned, on or about 3 February 1974, Appellant wrongfully deserted the said vessel at the port of Honolulu, Hawaii. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence various documents including the vessel's log entry concerning the incident, and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2032Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/15/19759/15/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2033 - NEVESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 19 December 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months outright plus six months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of the charge of violation of a statute (46 U.S.C. 224a). The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the Fishing Vessel CONSTITUTION under authority of the license above captioned, from on or about 29 October 1973, to on or about 4 December 1973, Appellant did willfully employ of engage to perform the duties of mate aboard CONSTITUTION, a fishing vessel of 465.92 gross tons, a person or persons not licensed to perform such duties, in violation of 46 U.S.C. 224a, for a fishing voyage on the high seas that began in Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico, and terminated in San Diego, California.Appeal No. 2033Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/16/19759/16/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2034 - BUFFINGTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 21 November 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as a Master on board the United States S/S SABINE under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 17 August 1973, Appellant: (i) departed Bridgeport, Connecticut, on a foreign voyage to Punta Cardon, Venezuela, without signing Shipping Articles before a U.S. Shipping Commissioner to ship in foreign trade. (ii) while serving as Master on this voyage, from 20-26 August, failed to maintain an official logbook.Appeal No. 2034Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/16/19759/16/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2035 - KROHNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 April 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for two months outright plus three months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the SS MARINE FLORIDIAN under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 20 January 1973, did wrongfully fail to navigate said vessel in compliance with Rule 19 and Rule 22 of the International Rules of the Road, while serving as the officer in charge of navigating said vessel. At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on Appellant's behalf by the Administrative Law Judge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence his own testimony and documentary evidence consisting of sixteen exhibits.Appeal No. 2035Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/19/19759/19/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2036 - SCHMIDTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1 and 3. By order dated 28 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Maine, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the captioned document on or about 16 January 1969, Appellant was convicted of a violation of Chapter 94 Section 205 of the General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the Third District Court of Eastern Middlesex, a Court of Record, for "violation of narcotic drug law (illegal possession of marijuana)."Appeal No. 2036Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/22/19759/22/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2037 - SABOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30, now 5.30. By order dated 8 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an A.B. on board the United States SS FREDERICK LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant; (1) did on or about 24 September 1974, while said vessel was in the port of Malili, Indonesia, wrongfully have intoxicating liquor in his possession; (2) did on or about 7 October 1974, while said vessel was in the Port of Bangkok, Thailand, wrongfully fail to perform his duties;Appeal No. 2037Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/23/19759/23/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2038 - METCALFEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 25 April 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS SAN ANTONIO under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 23 April 1975, Appellant did wrongfully commit assault and battery on a member of the crew, Joseph M. Kelly. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel, with some assistance from the Beaumont-Port Arthur National Maritime Union Port Agent, Joseph Patton, and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of one witness and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2038Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/30/19759/30/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2039 - DIETZEThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 15 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as pilot on board M/V ANCO PRINCESS being the holder of the license above captioned, on or about 24 September 1974, Appellant, while navigating said vessel upbound on the Misissippi River and meeting a downbound vessel and tow at approximately mile 4 AHP, (1) wrongfully failed to execute a port-to-port passing in accordance with Article 18, Inland Rules of the Road, thereby contributing to the collision between said vessel and the tow of the M/V LIBBY BLACK, and (2) wrongfully failed to sound whistle signals in accordance with Article 18, Inland Rules of the Road. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2039Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/8/197510/8/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2040 - RAMIREZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 9 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for six months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an oiler on board the SS HAWAIIAN LEGISLATOR under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 28 October 1974, Appellant did. FIRST, wrongfully Assault and Batter by beating a member of the crew, namely, 3rd Assistant Engineer Gilbert D. Quinn, and. SECOND, wrongfully fail to perform his assigned duties by reason of intoxication. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications.Appeal No. 2040Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/17/197510/17/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2041 - SISKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 May 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for the three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification as found proved alleges that while serving as operator of the towboat M/V JOSEPH M. JONES, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 26 February 1975, Appellant negligently overtook the M/V T.M. NORSWORTHY and tow and negligently attempted at Mile 636, Ohio River to pass it under circumstances involving risk of collision and without the assent or knowledge of the Pilot of the T.M. NORSWORTHY, which was then engaged in a difficult and dangerous flanking maneuver to round a bend under conditions of very high water and strong currents. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specificationAppeal No. 2041Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/29/197510/29/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2042 - KELLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 October 1974, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Chief Engineer on board the SS JOHN B. WATERMAN, while the vessel was at sea, under authority of the document and license above captioned, Appellant did: (1) on 10 February 1974, at about 0800, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the Master in that he failed to report to the Master's office to be logged, (2) on 10 February 1974, at about 0735, use abusive language toward the Master, (3) on 10 February 1974, at about 1300, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the master in that he failed to report to the master's office to be logged, (4) on 4 April 1974, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the master in that he failed to have the engine watchstander's quarters soogeed, and (5) on 4 April 1974, use abusive language toward the master.Appeal No. 2042Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/29/197511/29/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1990 - BOURGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 13 February 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana suspended Appellant's license for three months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the MV FIVE FORKS under authority of the license above captioned on or about 4 February 1972, Appellant did negligently fail to provide for the safety of one of the passengers Robert J. Ricaud, by permitting him to disembark the vessel under hazardous conditions without requiring the use of a lifesaving device, while the vessel was at the Mobil Oil Drilling Rig Central Facility 129, Block 129, Eugene Island area, Gulf of Mexico. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the Certificate of death of Robert J. Ricaud and the testimony of two members of the crew of the FIVE FORKS. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and that od a character witness.Appeal No. 1990Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/27/197312/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1991 - MOOREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 14 June 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana suspended Appellant's license for 3 months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Pilot on board the SS HESS REFINER under authority of the above captioned license, on or about 1 February 1973, Appellant did wrongfully proceed at an immoderate speed in conditions of reduced visibility due to fog in Southwest Pass thereby contributing to a collision between said vessel and the M/V SOCRATES and tow, the T/B ALLIED CHEMICAL No. 44. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 1991Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/26/197310/26/197312/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1992 - COPELANDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 12 October 1972, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Corpus Christi, Texas suspended Appellant's license for one month on two months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the TX 4207 XH under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 19 August 1972, Appellant permitted said vessel to carry in excess of 6 passengers while said vessel did not have on board a valid Certificate of Inspection in violation of 46 U.S.C. 390 et seq. as specified in 46 CFR 176.01-(a). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence some photographs of the vessel, a handwritten list of persons aboard and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 1992Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/20/197311/20/197312/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1993 - FRACCAROAppellant appeals under 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 137.30-1 from three orders entered by an Administrative Law Judge of the U. S. Coast Guard after hearing held at Oswego, New York, on several dates in April 1969. The charges of misconduct all involved service as a Great Lakes pilot aboard three foreign vessels: M/V SAKUMO LAGOON, M/V BENGKALIS, and M/V THERON. On 28 January 1969, Appellant was served with charges of misconduct for hearing to commence on 16 April 1969. The offenses alleged were that while serving under authority of his license as pilot: (1) aboard the Ghanian SAKUMO LAGOON on 25 September 1968, Appellant overtook SS CARSON J. CALLAWAY in the St. Lawrence River without obtaining a whistle signal assenting to an overtaking proposal in violation of 33 CFR 90.8, and (2) aboard the Canadian THERON on 30 November 1968 navigated the vessel on the St. Lawrence River in excess of the prescribed speed.Appeal No. 1993Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/30/197312/30/197312/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1994 - TOMPKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance wit Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 23 December 1972, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 4 months outright plus 2 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an oiler on board the United States SS IBERVILLE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 8,9,10, and 11 November, 1972, Appellant did wrongfully absent himself from the vessel without permission and did wrongfully fail to perform his assigned duties. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certified copies of the Official Logbook entries and an extract of the Shipping Articles of the SS IBERVILLE.Appeal No. 1994Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/4/19742/4/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1995 - NAPIERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 24 September 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana revoked Appellant's seaman document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as second electrician on board the United States SS CARRIER DOVE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 25 July 1973, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter by striking with a beer can the crew pantryman while the vessel was in the port of Durban, Union of South Africa. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. In mitigation, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of the crew pantryman and his own testimony.Appeal No. 1995Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/19/19743/19/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1996 - LEWISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 20 February 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 7 months outright plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Fireman/Watertender on board the SS Elizabethport under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 21 May 1972, Appellant, while the vessel was in the port of Naha, Okinawa, (1) Wrongfully engaged in mutual combat with a fellow crewmember, to wit, Patrick G. Fox, Engine Utility; and (2) Wrongfully failed to obey an order given by the Master to cease fighting with said fellow crewmember. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel. He entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. Upon his failure to attend subsequent sessions, the proceedings were properly continued in absentia.Appeal No. 1996Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/18/19744/18/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1997 - MELANSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 6 August 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license for 2 months outright upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Chief Mate on board the SS EXXON SAN FRANCISCO under authority of the license above described, on or about 24 June 1973 Appellant did cause the spill of approximately 10 gallons of heating oil into Houston Ship Channel, Exxon Docks, Bayton, Texas. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 1997Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/18/19744/18/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1998 - LEBOEUFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 11 September 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas suspended Appellant's seaman document for 3 months outright upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board the United States Tank Barge GEORGE under authority of the document above captioned, on 2 September 1973, Appellant allowed approximately one (1) barrel of decant oil to overflow out of number 5S cargo tank and enter the Calcasieu River at Citgo Docks, Lake Charles, Louisiana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and two exhibits.Appeal No. 1998Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/18/19744/18/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1999 - JOSSYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 14 November 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended individually the license held by each Appellant for a period of 12 months on 18 months' probation upon finding each guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved against Appellant Alt alleges that while serving as operator aboard the DIXIE LEE, under authority of the above-captioned license, on or about 20 August 1973, he wrongfully operated a foreign built boat carrying passengers from a U.S. port and returned to a U.S. port in violation of 19 CFR 4.80(e). The specification found proved against Appellant Jossy is identical to the above except that it alleges serving as operator aboard the JERI-JO III.Appeal No. 1999Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19745/9/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2000 - ELIPEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 9 November 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months outright plus 2 months on 9 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS SANTA BARBARA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 10 August 1973, Appellant did wrongfully engage in mutual combat with a fellow crew member, to wit, Mario Fernandez, Steward Utility, while the vessel was in the port of Kingston, Jamaica. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2000Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19746/5/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2001 - WALLACEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 12 September 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Fireman/Watertender on board the United States SS SAN JUAN authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 December 1972, Appellant wrongfully possessed marijuana and heroin while the vessel was in the port of Kobe, Japan. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence shipping articles for the voyage in question, entries from the official log book and a Japanese Judgment of Conviction and Sentencing.Appeal No. 2001Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/14/19746/14/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2002 - ADAMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 8 August 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's seaman documents for one month outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board the United States Tank Barge LBT-18 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 16 July 1973 Appellant did cause a spill of approximately 120 gallons of crude petroleum condensate upon the waters of Houston Ship Channel at Robertson Terminal. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a diagram of the scene, the testimony of Mr. Marvin Epps, the dockman for Robertson Terminal, and Petty Officer Clark, the Investigator. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and that of Captain Joseph Courtaux, the tug Captain.Appeal No. 2002Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/19/19749/19/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2003 - PEREIRAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 11 July 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months outright plus two months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Second Pumpman on board the United States NS YUKON under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 3 January 1973, Appellant wrongfully deserted the said vessel at Kwajalein Atoll (United States Trust). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records from the USNS YUKON, and the depositions of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2003Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/8/19747/8/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2004 - LORDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 13 September 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license for two months outright plus ten months on eighteen months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master on board SS C. E. DANT under authority of the license above captioned, on 4 September 1972, Appellant while in the Strait of Juan de Fuca negligently allowed his vessel to proceed at immoderate speed in restricted visibility, thereby continuing to a collision between the vessel and MV AEGEAN SEA. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of C. E. DANT, certain photographs, and the testimony of witnesses.Appeal No. 2004Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/22/19748/22/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2005 - BEROUDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 18 March 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that, on 4 September 1973, Appellant was convicted in Delaware County Court, Media, Pennsylvania, a court of record in Delaware County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, for violation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certified copies of the indictments and court conviction. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, that of a character witness and seven letters of character.Appeal No. 2005Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/23/19748/23/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2006 - MCCOYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 12 December 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a day third engineer on board SS DEL ORO under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 26 February 1973, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties while the vessel was at Abidjan, Ivory Coast. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of DEL ORO and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered no evidence. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of twelve months.Appeal No. 2006Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/3/19748/3/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2007 - ARMADThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 9 August 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Radio/Telegraph Operator on board the SS JEFFERSON CITY VICTORY under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 9 December 1972, while the vessel was at sea, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter a fellow crewmember, Third Assistant Engineer J.E. Frazer, and did wrongfully assault and batter him a few days later ashore. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2007Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/5/19749/5/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2008 - GOODWINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 9 January 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months outright plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the MV PIONEER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 19 September 1973, Appellant negligently failed to keep clear of the tankship SANINENA II causing a collision between the two vessels. At the hearing, Appellant initially elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. At a subsequent session, he was represented by professional counsel. At the final session, the proceedings were properly concluded in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the live testimony of three witnesses and various documents.Appeal No. 2008Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/13/19749/13/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2333 - AYALAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1 By order dated 21 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman's document for four months, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS MORMACSAGA under authority of the document above captioned, on 11 October 1979, Appellant assaulted and battered Simon Flax, the Boatswain, by striking him with a "4x4" wooden board. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 27 November, 3 and 14 December 1979, 17 and 20 January and 13 February 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. After the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. The entire decision was served on 31 May 1980. Appeal was timely filed on 13 June 1980 and perfected on 8 October 1980.Appeal No. 2333Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198312/5/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2334 - HARTLAGE.PDFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 3 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, North Carolina suspended Appellant's license for one month upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States SS JACKSONVILLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 October 1982, Appellant wrongfully allowed the vessel to enter the port of Wilmington, North Carolina without propulsion power, which was a hazardous condition, without first notifying the Captain of the Port, Wilmington, North Carolina as is required by 33 CFR 161.15 The hearing was held at Wilmington, North Carolina on 3 and 4 November 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2334Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/6/198312/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2335 - PRIDGENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license and document for four months, upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. The specification of the negligence charge alleges that while serving as pilot of the M/V GREAT LAKES, under authority of the license and document above captioned, on or about 9 October 1979, Appellant navigated that vessel in a negligent manner by allowing it to allide with moored construction barges at the Brightman Street Bridge, Fall River, Massachusetts. The specification of the misconduct charge alleges that while Appellant was serving as pilot he did so without a proper endorsement on his license. The Master of the vessel, Egil K. Pedersen, was also charged with negligence and misconduct. The hearing was held in joinder with that of the Master at Providence, Rhode Island on 12 October 1979, 8 November 1979, 11 December 1979 and 4 January 1980.Appeal No. 2335Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/9/198312/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2336 - SAMPSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 April 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Tampa, Florida revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding him guilty of incompetence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant while serving as Operator on board the United States S/V LA GRINGA, O.N. 530918, under authority of the license above captioned, did during the year 1981, operate said vessel from St. Petersburg Municipal Marina Tampa Bay, Florida, while physically incompetent because of inadequate vision. The hearing was held at Tampa, Florida, on 12 February 1982 and on 13 April 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and single specification thereunder The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits, one of which, Exhibit 1, was a stipulation of fact signed by both the Investigating Officer and the Appellant.Appeal No. 2336Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/9/198312/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2337 - NYBORGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California admonished Appellant. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot on board the United States SS SAN MARCOS and directing the movements of said vessel under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 12 May 1981, Appellant failed to initiate adequate and timely evasive maneuvers to avoid collision with the F/V SANDRA LINN while overtaking said vessel in the vicinity of the Bay Bridge in San Francisco Bay. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 28 July, 11,21,26 and 31 August 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence several documents and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2337Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/6/19841/6/198412/20/2017
Page 14 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.