CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2392 - BUSINELLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 July 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license and document for one month plus an additional two months on six months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master aboard the M/V POINT CHALEUR, under authority of the captioned documents, Appellant did, on or about 4 May 1984, operate the M/V POINT CHALEUR without a licensed chief engineer on board as required by the vessel's Certificate of Inspection. The hearing was held at Corpus Christi, Texas, on 5 June 1984. At the hearing, Appellant elected to represent himself and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence his own testimony and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2392Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/13/19856/13/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2393 - STEWARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-l. By order dated 3 August l982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for two months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as undocking master on board the M/V AL-TAHA, under authority of the captioned license on 19 January 1982, Appellant did navigate the M/V AL-TAHA aground on a charted shoal in Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. The hearing was conducted in Boston, Massachusetts, on 12 and 14 April and 3 May 1982. At the hearing Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and eighteen exhibits.Appeal No. 2393Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/5/19857/5/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2394 - ANTUNEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving aboard the SS LESLIE LYKES, under authority of his document, Appellant did, on or about 21 July 1983, while the ship was moored in Houston, Texas, wrongfully have in his possession marijuana. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas, on 27 July 1983. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge concluded that the charge and specification had been proved and entered an order revoking Appellant's merchant mariner's document. The Decision and Order was served 12 September 1983. Appeal was timely filed and a copy of the transcript requested on 25 August 1983.Appeal No. 2394Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/11/19857/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2395 - LAMBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 November 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida suspended Appellant's license for six months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding prove a charge of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master on board the United State Army Dredge McFARLAND under authority of the license above captioned, on 1 May 1983, Appellant failed to ensure proper supervision of the removal of an electric hydraulic solenoid valve and failed to ensure that proper precautions were taken before allowing hotwork to be performed on the hydraulic system. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, florida, on 10 August 1983 and 23 September 1983. appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits and the testimony of six witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced his own testimony, that of another witness, and three exhibits.Appeal No. 2395Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/11/19857/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2396 - MCDOWELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 October 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while navigating the M/V ANANGEL SPIRIT under the authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 November 1983 while approaching the MacArthur Lock, in the St. Marys River failed to maintain control of the M/V ANANGEL SPIRIT by allowing it to sheer into the path of the M/V INDIANA HARBOR resulting in the M/V ANANGEL SPIRIT colliding with the M/V INDIANA HARBOR. The hearing was held at St. Ignace, Michigan, on 15 December 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2396Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/11/19857/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2397 - GEWANTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 27 March 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman's license and document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, on or about 15 January 1984, on board the M/V GOLDEN MOON wrongfully had in his possession marijuana and, at the same time and place, wrongfully had in his possession a pistol. On 10 April 1985, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary license and document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 12 April 1985.Appeal No. 2397Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/15/19857/15/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2398 - BRAZELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239g and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 March 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's document for four months upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as tankerman aboard T/B TT-7002, did on or about 24 December 1980, fail to adequately supervise cargo loading operations causing a discharge of oil into the navigable waters of the United States, the Neches, River. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 13 February 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seventeen exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses.Appeal No. 2398Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2399 - LANCASTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's license upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V PAT BREEN, under authority of his license, Appellant did, on or about 5 March 1984, while down bound on the Ohio River at approximately mile 860 fail to safely navigate said vessel and its tow resulting in the tow grounding on the left descending bank of the river. The hearing was held at Evansville, Indiana on 24 April 1984. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge concluded that the Charge and specification had been proved and entered an order suspending Appellant's merchant mariner's license. The Decision and Order was served 28 February 1985. Appeal was timely filed and a copy of the transcript requested on 21 March 1985.Appeal No. 2399Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/31/19857/31/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2400 - WIDMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 June 1984, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license for six months and an additional six months on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V MISS HAVASUPAI, Appellant did on 12 May 1984 negligently fail to operate said vessel with due caution by failing to take prompt and clearly recognizable action to avoid a vessel that was dead in the water in the vicinity of London Bridge, Lake Havasu City and did on 3 June 1984 negligently fail to navigate said vessel with due caution by failing to take prompt and clearly recognizable action to avoid vessels restricted in their ability to maneuver in the vicinity of London Bridge, Lake Havasu City. The hearing was held at Lake Havasu City, Arizona, on 11 June 1984, and at Long Beach, California, on 26 June 1984.Appeal No. 2400Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/31/19857/31/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2401- CAVANAUGHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 31 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct and a charge of being a user of a dangerous drug. The specifications supporting these two charges allege that Appellant, while serving under authority of the captioned document on board the SS CONSTITUTION did, on or about 1900 24 February 1984 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully use cocaine and at the same time and place, being holder of the captioned document, was a user of cocaine. On 16 April 1985, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary document. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 19 April 1985.Appeal No. 2401Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2391 - STUMESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 January l984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seamen's license and document for a period of six months upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Radio Electronic Officer aboard the S/S VELMA LYKES under authority of the captioned documents, Appellant did, on or about 2 April 1983, while said vessel was in the port of Alexandria, Egypt, wrongfully assault and batter by hitting with fists the Master of said vessel. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas, on 9 November, 5 and 14 December 1983. At the hearing Appellant, although not present, was represented by professional counsel who entered a plea of not guilty on his behalf.Appeal No. 2391Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/13/19856/13/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2383 - SWIEREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 August 1984 an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a dangerous drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the license and document above captioned, on or about 12 October 1979, Appellant was convicted by the U. S. District court for the Eastern District of Texas of Violating a dangerous drug law of the United States, to wit: marijuana possession. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 31 August 1984. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2383Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19852/22/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2384 - WILLIAMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 21 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as oiler aboard the S/S INGER, under authority of the above captioned document, Appellant did, on or about 29 March 1983 "wrongfully have in [his] possession certain narcotics, to wit: Marijuana." The hearing was held at Houston, Texas, on 23 May 1983. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. Appellant was assisted by his father. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits, and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2384Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/27/19852/27/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2385 - CAINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 June 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved the charge of conviction for a dangerous drug law violation. The specification found proved alleged that while being the holder of the above-captioned document, on or about 3 September 1975, Appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of King County, Washington, a court of record, for the possession of heroin. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington, on 5 June 1984. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel, with the assistance of non-professional counsel, and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits.Appeal No. 2385Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/20/19853/20/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2386 - LOUVIEREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 December 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for one month upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V EDGAR BROWN, JR. under the authority of the captioned license Appellant did, on or about 28 October 1983, negligently navigate said vessel at approximately mile 188 of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway by failing to keep clear of a vessel he as overtaking thereby contributing to a collision between his tow and the tank barge AS 2008. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 17 November 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2386Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/9/19854/9/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2387 - BARRIOSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 February 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for one month plus an additional three months remitted on twelve months probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant while serving as Operator on board the M/V KATIE CHERAMIE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 20 December 1983, while underway in Lake Wimico, Jackson River and Apalachicola River, Florida, did relinquish the actual direction and control of said vessel to a person not licensed by the Coast Guard as an operator or second-class operator of uninspected towing vessels; a violation of 46 CFR 157.30-45. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 1 February 1984. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2387Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/23/19854/23/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2388 - MANLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the document above captioned, on or about 5 June 1981, Appellant was convicted of possession of marijuana by the County Court of Harris County, Texas. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 12 November 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the record of Appellant's conviction on 5 June 1981. In defense, Appellant made several motions related to the admissibility of the court records, the legal effect of the Texas conviction, and the legal adequacy of the Coast Guard proceeding.Appeal No. 2388Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/24/19854/24/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2389 - COLLAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order entered 7 June 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland suspended Appellant's license and document for six months upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate aboard SS CORONADO under authority of the captioned documents, Appellant did on or about 1 April 1983, while said vessel was at anchor, wrongfully fail to perform his duty as Deck Watch Officer by falling asleep on the wheelhouse settee. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 2 May and 7 June 1984. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.Appeal No. 2389Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/6/19855/6/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2390 - PURSERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license and document for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while navigating the M/V SATOCO under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 18 March 1984, Appellant negligently: (1) failed to navigate said vessel at a safe speed adapted to the prevailing circumstances and conditions of fog and restricted visibility, when from radio transmissions, he was aware of the approach of another vessel; and (2) failed to maintain a proper lookout on the M/V SATOCO; both of which contributed to the collision of the M/V INTREPID and the T/B CHROMALLOY I being pushed by the M/V SATOCO. The hearing was held at Mobile, Alabama, on 13 April, 3 May, and 8 June 3 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge andAppeal No. 2390Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/6/19855/6/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2381 - GURGIOLOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 June 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of the charge of conviction for a dangerous drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while holder of the captioned license, was convicted on 2 September 1982 of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 846, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The hearing was held in Miami, Florida on 17 May 1984. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by two non-attorney representatives and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence four documents.Appeal No. 2381Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/20/19852/20/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2382 - NILSENThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 1 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Master of the S/S SAN JUAN, under the authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did on 11 February 1980, while said vessel was departing San Juan, Puerto Rico, fail to navigate the vessel within the confines of the Bar Channel causing said vessel to ground. Two other specifications were dismissed, one on motion of the Investigating Officer, the other on motion of Appellant. The hearing was held at San Juan, Puerto Rico, on 3 February, 4 February, and 31 March 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification.Appeal No. 2382Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19852/22/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2373 - OLDOWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g), and 46 CFR 5930-1. By order dated 25 April 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's license for two months on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V SHAMAN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 22 July 1982, Appellant failed to properly navigate the vessel in the confined waters adjacent to Knights Island, Prince William Sound, Alaska, thereby contributing to the grounding of the vessel. The hearing, was held at Anchorage, Alaska on 4 and 5 January, 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2373Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/16/198410/16/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2374 - JETERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 (b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as fleet chef aboard the SS EXXON SAN FRANCISCO, under the authority of the document above captioned, on or about 24 December 1981, while the vessel was at sea, Appellant did wrongfully rape a crew member of the vessel, namely, Robin Casson. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas 14 December 1982, 22 and 24 January 1983, 9 February 1983 and 13 and 15 April 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses, transcripts of depositions of six additional witnesses, and seven other exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, the testimony of two additional witnesses, transcripts of depositions of four witnesses, and three other exhibits.Appeal No. 2374Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/23/198411/23/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2375 - CLEMENTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1983 an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license and document for two months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct, charged as a violation of statute. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal on 2 November 1983. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the uninspected towed vessel M/V JOAN CENAC, under authority of the above captioned license, on or about 10 April, 1983, Appellant wrongfully absented himself from the wheelhouse for a period of approximately four (4) hours leaving the responsibility for navigation of the vessel and tow to an unlicensed mate, in violation of 46 U.S.C. 405(b)(2). The hearing was held in Port Aurthur, Texas on 10 May 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel.He entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence six exhibits and one witness. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence one document and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2375Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/11/19851/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2376 - FRANKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as utility 3rd on board the S.S. ASHLEY LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 February 1983, while said vessel was in the port of Houston, Texas, Appellant wrongfully possessed certain narcotics, to wit: hashish and marijuana. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 28 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to him.Appeal No. 2376Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/2/19852/2/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2377 - HICKEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 May 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Maine revoked Appellant's seaman's document and license upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a dangerous drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the documents above captioned, on or about 23 March 1984, Appellant was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Maine for conspiring to import large quantities of marijuana into the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence 2 exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence 6 exhibits and his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then entered an order revoking the merchant mariner's license and document issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2377Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/7/19852/7/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2378 - CALICCHIOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 October 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for a period of six months remitted on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant while serving as Master aboard the M/V POLING BROS. NO. 7: ...while transiting out bound the CNJ Railroad Bridge in Newark Bay, NJ, did on or about 0930, 21 July 1983 negligently fail to navigate your vessel with due caution resulting in a collision between your vessel, the M/V POLING BROS. No. 7 and the Great Lakes Drill Barge No. 7 which was anchored in the East Draw of Newark Bay, NJ engaged in demolition operations. The hearing was held in New York, New York, on 13, 16 and 26 September 1983.Appeal No. 2378Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/8/19852/8/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2379 - DRUMThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 November 1983, Administrative Law Judge of the united States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for one month plus an additional two months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V DAVID ESPER under the authority of the above captioned license, Appellant did, on or about 9 May 1983, while pushing twelve loaded coal barges downbound on the Ohio River, fail to navigate his vessel so as to avoid alliding with the Big Four Railroad Bridge at approximately mile 603 on the Ohio River. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on 12 July 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2379Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/8/19852/8/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2380 - HALLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C.7702 (b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 February 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's mariner's license for two months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V LOUIS FRANK, under the authority of the above captioned license, at or about 2330, 25 April 1983, Appellant did cause his tow to allide with the Florence Highway Bridge at Mile 56.0 of the Illinois River. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on 2-3 June 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documentary exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2380Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/8/19852/8/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2371 - MCFATEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Assistant Engineer on board the M/V WARRIOR under authority of the above captioned documents did, on or about 16 September 1980, wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Engineer, Mr. Matthew P. Laving, with a deadly weapon, to wit, a knife, and inflicted severe bodily harm while the vessel was underway in San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 25 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced five documents and the testimony of two witnesses into evidence. In defense, Appellant introduced his own testimony into evidence.Appeal No. 2371Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/27/19849/27/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2372 - COLLAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 CFR 5.30-15(a)(1). The hearing was held on 2 May 1984 and 7 June 1984 at Baltimore, Maryland. By order dated 7 June 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license and seaman's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification alleges that while serving as Second Mate aboard the SS CORONADO, under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 1 April 1983, Appellant did fail to perform his duty as deck watch officer by falling asleep on the wheelhouse settee while the vessel was at anchor. On 28 June 1984, the Appellant requested a temporary license and document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order dated 3 July 1984.Appeal No. 2372Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/5/198410/5/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2361 - ZEMELThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g), 23b and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 July 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Cost Guard at Long Beach, California revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct and the charge of having been a user of a narcotic drug. The specifications found proved allege that while acting under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 May 1979, Appellant made a false or fraudulent statement on CG Form 719B (Rev. 9-72), Seaman's Certificate Application, by declaring that he had used a narcotic drug, which declaration was false; and that while being the holder of the document above captioned, on or about 10 September 1982 and for an unknown period of time before, Appellant was wrongfully a user of a narcotic drug. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 28 May, 27 June, and 18 July 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three documents and the testimony of one witness. Appellant offered no evidence in defense.Appeal No. 2361Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2362 - ARNOLDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 4l United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for ten months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able-bodied seaman on board the SS PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 12 December 1981 through 19 December 1981, Appellant wrongfully saved in the capacity noted his document was in the possession of the Coast Guard in Compliance with a Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge's order. The hearing was held in Seattle, Washington on 9 September, 20 October, and 17 December 1982. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Prior to arraignment, Appellant moved for dismissal. The motion was denied. After denial of the motion to dismiss and upon being arraigned, Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge an specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence sixteen documents. The Appellant offered no defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered and oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and single specification had been proved by plea. He then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issues to Appellant for a period of ten months. The entire decision was served on 12 January 1983. Appeal was timely filed on 22 December 1982, and perfected on 23 March 1983.Appeal No. 2362Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2363 - MANNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S. Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's Seaman's License for three months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the M/V CAPTAIN HORNBLOWER, under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did on 16 and 17 February 1981, while carrying 66 and 48 passengers respectively between the hours of 1900 and 2300 each day, wrongfully operate said vessel, a non-Coast Guard certificated vessel, in violation of the provisions of 46 U.S.C. 390c(a). The hearing was held at san Francisco, California, on 2 March, 2 April, 7 April, 1 May, 7 May, 24 June, and 7 July 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2363Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2364 - CAMPANAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 August 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as wiper on board the United States S.S. PRESIDENT PIERCE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 1600, 21 April 1983, Appellant did wrongfully disobey a lawful order of the First Engineer, Roy A. Carlson, in that he refused to pick up debris. The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 8 August 1983. Appellant did not appear at the hearing and was not represented. The hearing proceeded in absentia. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty on behalf of Appellant. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits.Appeal No. 2364Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/10/19847/10/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2365 - EASTMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 August 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Maine suspended Appellant's license for two months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. The specification found proved under the charge of negligence alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V VIKING SUN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 21 June 1981, Appellant continued the voyage of the M/V VIKING SUN into hazardous waters after the starboard engine stalled. The specifications found proved under the charge of misconduct allege that Appellant wrongfully: (1) failed to provide the passengers with emergency procedures in accordance with 46 CFR 185.25-1 and (2) operated the M/V VIKING SUN while carrying passengers without a valid certificate of inspection. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine on 15, 16, and 17 June 1982.Appeal No. 2365Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/10/19847/10/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2366 - MONAGHANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 December 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's mariner's license for two months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V STEEL PIONEER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 7 May 1983, Appellant navigated his flotilla in such a manner that the port lead barge allided with the guidewall at Markland Lock, Ohio River. The hearing was held at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on 18 August 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2366Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/16/19847/16/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2367 - SPENCERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5. 30-1. By order dated 12 September 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's mariner's license for two months, plus two months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V RUST FLOWERS, under authority of the above captioned license, at or about 1955, 14 April 1983, Appellant did cause his tow to allide with the tank barge CE-64, the crane barge number 2, the freight barge VL-361, and the freight barge PB-142, while they were moored at the National Marine Services repair facility, mile 196.6, upper Mississippi River. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on 4 May 1983, and 1 June 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2367Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/17/19847/17/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2368 - MADJIWITAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 March 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's license for two months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot on board the Panamanian vessel, the M/V PASSAT, under the authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 August 1983, Appellant negligently failed to insure that there was adequate clearance between the vessel's #4 cargo hatch boom and the Tower Drive Bridge, which spans the Fox River at Green Bay, Wisconsin, prior to transiting beneath the bridge, causing the boom to strike the bridge. The hearing was held at Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin on 25 August 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2368Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/14/19848/14/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2369 - ASHLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license for two months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V ELDORADO under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 1400, 22 January 1983, Appellant failed "to maneuver his vessel with caution, placing it in risk of a collision with the SS EXXON GALVESTON, and making it necessary for the SS EXXON GALVESTON, which was to the right in a crossing situation, to make an emergency maneuver." The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 10 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2369Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/22/19848/22/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2370 - LEWISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V EXXON CRYSTAL RIVER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 February 1983, Appellant negligently failed to safely navigate a flotilla consisting of the M/V EXXON CRYSTAL RIVER and EXXON BARGE NUMBER 32, resulting in an allision between the flotilla and the Koch Oil Terminal Pier in Newport News, Virginia. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 17 March 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2370Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/5/19849/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2353 - EDGELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana suspended Appellant's seaman's document for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Qualified Member of the Engine Department (QMED) on board the SS DELTA NORTE, under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 27 December 1982, Appellant did wrongfully engage in mutual combat with a fellow crewmember. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana on 25 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence two exhibits and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2353Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19846/4/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2354 - DITMARSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) 46 CFR 5.30-1 and 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 26 May 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Miami, Florida, revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding proved the charge of convict ion for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the license above captioned, on or about 23 December 1982 Appellant was convicted of knowingly, intentionally, and unlawfully possessing a controlled substance, to wit, marijuana. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida on 26 May 1983. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigation Officer introduced in evidence five documents including a copy of the judgement of conviction of the New Jersey Superior Court, Mercer County, in the case State of New Jersey v. Gary Neal Ditmars, and a true copy of the indictment filed in the same ease.Appeal No. 2354Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2355 - RHULEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 March 1982, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while holder of the captioned license, was convicted on 10 August 1981 of possession of narcotics, to wit, cannabis, by the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit for Broward County, Florida. The hearing was held in Miami, Florida on 12 March 1982. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence two documents. In defense, Appellant introduced various items of documentary evidence and made an unsworn statement in mitigation.Appeal No. 2355Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2356 - FOSTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V CHARGER, under the authority of the above captioned license, on or about 24 and 25 April 1981 Appellant wrongfully: operated the vessel while under the influence of intoxicating beverages while carrying passengers; molested one or more female passengers by using improper an suggestive language and placing his hands on their private parts in a lewd and lascivious manner against the female passengers' will; and used a narcotic drug by smoking a marijuana cigarette. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii on 14 May 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and to each specification.Appeal No. 2356Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2357 - GEESEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for a period of six months, remitted on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. Three specifications were found proved. The first alleges that on 7 February 1982, Appellant, while serving as second mate on board the SS PRESIDENT MADISON under authority of the above captioned documents, failed to perform his duties due to intoxication. The second and third specifications allege failure to obey direct orders of the Master to go below after being relieved of his bridge watch. The hearing was initially convened on board the SS PRESIDENT MADISON at San Francisco, California on 16 August 1982, and continued at Alameda, California on 9 November 1982, 7 February 1983, and 14 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses and several documents.Appeal No. 2357Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19846/8/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2358 - BUISSETThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C,. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 29 October 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specifications found proved under the charge of misconduct allege that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V SHARON B. under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 24 July, while said vessel was pushing the barge JEANNE MARIE in the Tangier Sound, Appellant wrongfully failed to maintain a proper lookout and wrongfully failed to take action to avoid a collision with the 19 foot motorboat, Registration No. MD-9267-P. The specification found proved under the charge of negligence alleges that while serving as aforementioned, on the same date, while said vessel was pushing the barge JEANNE MARIE in the Tangier Sound, Appellant failed to navigate the vessel with due caution, thereby causing a collision with the 19 foot motorboat, Registration No. MD-9267-P.Appeal No. 2358Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19846/8/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2359 - WAINEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order date 15 December 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for four months, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. The specifications found proved under the charge of negligence allege that while serving as Master on board the United States M/V AURIGA, Appellant on or about 10 August 1981, while navigating in conditions of fog and restricted visibility: (1) failed to obtain, or properly use, information available to him from radar observations to determine the course and speed of another vessel in his vicinity, thereby contributing to a collision with the SS NAUSHON; (2) failed to use the bridge-to-bridge radiotelephone to determine the course and speed of another vessel in his vicinity, thereby contributing to a collision; (3) failed to navigate with caution during fog, notwithstanding the fact that information of the proximity and approach of another vessel was available to him from radar observations.Appeal No. 2359Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2360 - WILKINS.PDFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 September 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board M/V FREEDOM under authority of the above captioned license on or about 28 January 1981, Appellant exceeded the scope of his license by navigating the enrolled, coastwise, seagoing barge OCEAN 193, while not on the high seas, without having on board a properly licensed pilot as required. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida on 7 July 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was not present but was represented by professional counsel. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf. A stipulation of facts was entered into between Appellant's counsel and the Investigating Officer. The Investigating Officer also introduced in evidence an additional document and stipulated to Appellant's negative prior record.Appeal No. 2360Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2351 - EINSMANNBy order dated 27 June 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida dismissed without prejudice a charge of negligence supported by two specifications and a charge of misconduct supported by one specification which had been served on Appellant. ISSUE The appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge. Appellant asks that the charges and specifications be dismissed with prejudice. APPEARANCE: Corlett, Killian, Hardeman, McIntosh, & Levi, P.A. by David McIntosh OPINION The first question which must be answered is whether an event has occurred which is subject to appeal. As set forth in detail below, I conclude that it has not.Appeal No. 2351Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/15/19845/15/198412/20/2017
Page 8 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.