CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2120 - MCLAUGHLINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code, Section 239b, and Title 46, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Tampa, Florida, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that, while being the holder of the above captioned document, on or about 7 June 1974, Appellant was convicted of a violation of Florida Statute 893.13(1)(e) in the Circuit Criminal Justice Court of Hillsborough County, Florida, for violation of a narcotic drug law. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel, and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence a certified copy of the Judgement of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation entered in Case No. 74-445 in the Circuit Criminal Justice Court of Hillsborough County, Florida, dated 7 June 1974. Following the introduction of the court records, Appellant made a statement on his own behalf under oath. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2120Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/19/19784/19/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2121 - GIBBLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as ordinary seaman on board the United States SS ARCO PRESTIGE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 March 1977, Appellant, while the vessel was at sea did wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics, to wit, marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and seven exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and the testimony of one witness. On 11 May 1977 the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and the specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision and order was served on 14 May 1977.Appeal No. 2121Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19775/23/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2122 - RODIECKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 24 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seamans's documents for 3 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct after hearing held at Tampa, Florida. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as operator on board M/T ADMIRAL LEFFLER under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 26 November 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully required [sic.] an unlicensed person to relieve him from his wheel watch and control the tug for approximately ten minutes while he left the bridge. (2) wrongfully failed to maintain a proper lookout, this failure contributing to the collision between the towed barge CECO 2501 and the motorboat FL-6138-BU with the loss of three lives. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2122Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/15/19786/15/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2123 - ARNOLDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's license for four months on ten months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the United States towing vessel TECUMSEH, O.N. 258 916 under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 5 August 1976, Appellant allowed the towing bridle between his vessel and the barge SKIPANON to go slack and drag on the bottom of the Coos River in a submarine cable area causing the submarine cable to be broken. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification found proved. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the sworn testimony of Mssrs. Don Dillon, Dennis Reynolds, Homer Blakeney, Steven Johnson, Orville Fuller, and Peter Busick, and the following documents: Affidavit of Service of the Charge; U.S. Army Engineer District, Portland; "Coos Bay, Oregon 35' Channel Modification General Plan"; U.S. Army Engineer District, Portland; "Coos Bay, Oregon 35' Channel Modification Coos Bay and Empire Ranges"; Statement of Steven Phillip Johnson of 28 January 1977.Appeal No. 2123Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/14/19786/14/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2124 - BARROWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 3 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida suspended Appellant's license for 2 months outright plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Master on board the motor tug ESTHER MORAN made fast to the stern of the tank barge NEW YORK under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 January 1977, Appellant did negligently abdicate his position and negligently fail to perform his duties as master by placing himself in such a position that he was unable to take the necessary actions to avert the collision between the T/B NEW YORK and the Tampa Electric Company dock. A second specification alleging that Appellant did negligently cause oil to be spilled in Sparkman Channel, Tampa, Florida as a result of a collision between the T/B NEW YORK and the Tampa Electric Company dock was found not proved.Appeal No. 2124Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/15/19786/15/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2125 - COPLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document and Third Mate's License upon finding him physically incompetent. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Mate aboard the United States F/V ELSINORE under authority of the license above-captioned from 18 September 1976 until 28 October 1976 and on the date of the charge sheet, Appellant was physically incompetent, in that he was not possessed of the normal color sense. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of Honesto S. TAJUNA, First Class Hospital Corpsman, USCG. He also introduced documentary exhibits as follows: Exhibits 1A and 1B (excerpts from Coast Guard Medical Manual, (CG-294) Section 3C, pages 43 and 44); exhibits 3A and 3B (SF FORM 88, Report of Medical Examination for Appellant dated 31 August 1976).Appeal No. 2125Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/20/19786/20/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2126 - RIVERAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with the Title 46 United States Code 239(g) Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1 By order dated 21 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida suspended Appellant's license for 3 months on 12 months' probation with respect to all seaman's documents issued to Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator of the United States M/T CABO ROJO and /or the M/T PUERTO NUEVO under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 18 October 1976, Appellant wrongfully and negligently failed to navigate the Barge MIAMI, with the assistance of the towing vessels PUERTO NUEVO and CABO ROJO, with caution, notwithstanding the proximity of a visible buoy, thereby contributing to a collision between the MIAMI and the Bahia de San Juan lighted buoy 13 (LLNR1291) At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2126Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/3/19787/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2127 - CHAPMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 April 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master on board M/V VIRGINIA CLIPPER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 April 1977, Appellant wrongfully navigated the vessel from Baltimore, Maryland, to Norfolk, Virginia, without having on board one of the licensed engineers required by the certificate of inspection, in violation of 46 U.S.C. 222(R.S. 4436). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel, the president of the company which owns VIRGINIA CLIPPER, and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. Despite the plea of guilty, the Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a copy of the certificate of inspection of the vessel.Appeal No. 2127Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/18/19787/18/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2128 - HOLLINGSWORTHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order rendered on 15 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a third pantryman on board the SS President Fillmore under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 May 1977, appellant did "wrongfully create a disturbance aboard said vessel by yelling and addressing foul and abusive language to a fellow crewmember, J. B. ALLEN." At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and no exhibits. At the end of the hearing, the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order of admonition on Appellant.Appeal No. 2128Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/27/19787/27/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2129 - RENFROThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months outright plus four months on eight months's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as operator of the towboat MISS SYLVIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 July 1976, Appellant: (1) failed to keep out of the way in a crossing situation of the downbound vessel SEA HARMONY at New Orleans in the Mississippi River; (2) negligently entered the Mississippi River with his tow without regard to "existing traffic," "causing a collision between the tow and SEA HARMONY;" and (3) negligently cause a medium "oil pollution spill" and damage to SEA HARMONY At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2129Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/27/19787/27/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2130 - BARTLOWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code Federal Regulation 5.30-1. By order dated 28 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, North Carolina, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a steward utility on board SS AMERICAN RANGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 June 1977, Appellant wrongfully used abusive and profane language toward the vessel's First Assistant Engineer, Joseph Czarnecki. A second specification that Appellant wrongfully assaulted the First Assistant Engineer by brandishing his fist in a threatening manner and offering to inflict bodily harm was found not proved. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence relevant extracts of the ship's log, and the testimony of Joseph Czarnecki and Lawrence J. Grembocki.Appeal No. 2130Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/28/19787/28/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2131 - NUNEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 August 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while acting under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant altered the license by changing the date of issue from 22 February 1972 to 22 February 22 1973. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and documents relative to the issuance of license no. 103934. In defense, Appellant offered an unsworn statement. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 22 August 1977. Appeal was timely filed.Appeal No. 2131Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/4/19788/4/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2132 - KEENANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 January 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct in a hearing held at Corpus Cristi, Texas, on 21 December 1970. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS OVERSEAS PROGRESS under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 18 December 1970, Appellant wrongfully engaged in acts of sexual perversion with two other (named) members of the crew of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and pleaded guilty to the charge and specification. The Administrative Law Judge warned Appellant of the seriousness of the misconduct charged but Appellant, with concurrence of counsel, persisted in the plea. The Investigating Officer made a statement as to the facts as to which evidence was available and Appellant, through counsel, pleaded for leniency on the grounds that he was intoxicated at the time of the occurrences.Appeal No. 2132Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/13/19789/13/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2133 - SANDLINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master of SS LASH ITALIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 March 1976, Appellant neglected and failed to navigate the vessel with due caution which resulted in grounding of said vessel in Fort Sumter Channel, Charleston, South Carolina. A specification of "Misconduct," alleging that Appellant had wrongfully failed to give notice of that grounding in timely fashion was dismissed as not proved. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2133Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/25/19789/25/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2134 - JOHNSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master on board the United States SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 March 1977, Appellant failed to post a proper watch to attend the stern towing line leading from SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON to the tug TONY ST. PHILLIP. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending Appellant's license for a period of three months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 2134Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2135 - FOSSANIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 April 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him to be a user of a narcotic drug. The specification found proved alleges that on or about 8 October 1976, Appellant was, at or about [REDACTED] [REDACTED], New Jersey, wrongfully a user of a narcotic drug. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents and the testimony of several witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and that of his mother. At Appellant's request, the Administrative Law Judge arranged for examination of Appellant at U.S.P.H.S. Hospital, Staten Island, New York, and then himself called the examining physician as a witness. At the end of the hearing, the Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 20 May 1977. Appeal was timely filed, and perfected on 1 December 1977.Appeal No. 2135Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2136 - DILLONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 2 September, 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master of SS COVE COMMUNICATOR under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 1 May 1977, Appellant "wrongfully departed a port of the United States, to wit: New Orleans, Louisiana, to sea with less than 65 per centrum of the deck crew, exclusive of licensed officers, of said vessel holding a rating of able seaman." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and several pertinent voyage records of COVE COMMUNICATOR. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of two months on six months' probation.Appeal No. 2136Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2137 - DESVAUXThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR. 5.30-1. By order dated 8 August 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New, York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for eight months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, after finding her guilty of a charge of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Messman on board SS AUSTRAL ENVOY under of the document above captioned, Appellant did: (1) on or about 11 January 1977 at approximately 0800 while the vessel was at sea wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Steward, William Yang, by spitting in his face; (2) on or about 21 March 1977 at approximately 0945 while the vessel was at the Port Newark, N.J. wrongfully assault and batter the Master, Hector Bravo, by striking him in the face with her hand; (3) on 21 March 1977, at approximately 1250, while the vessel was at Port Newark, N.J., wrongfully assault and batter the Master, Hector Bravo, by striking him in the face with her hands and by kicking him with her feet. Appellant appeared pro se at the hearing and, after an explanation (by the Administrative Law Judge) of her right to counsel and the possible consequences of her plea, waived her right to counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to each of the three specifications.Appeal No. 2137Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/3/197811/3/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2138 - HARDSAWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 13 October 1977, as amended 17 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as OPERATOR on board the TUG COLUMBIA, O/N 516116 under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 15 September 1977, Appellant did negligently fail to correctly ascertain the height of his tow prior to attempting to pass under the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and as a result of that negligence collided with the Bridge causing damage to the Bridge and the tow. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the unsworn statements of the Appellant and one witness, and three items of documentary evidence.Appeal No. 2138Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/8/197811/8/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2139 - DANCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 26 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month on three months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board the United States tank barge BAYOU TECHE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 12 May 1977, Appellant did "transfer asphalt in said barge while not having sufficient capacity with the deck discharge containment." At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses. Appellant testified in his own behalf. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge reserved decision. He later concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of one month on three months' probation.Appeal No. 2139Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2140 - FOMICHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January, 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for ten months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS EAGLE VOYAGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13 July 1976, Appellant assaulted another crewmember with a dangerous weapon; on 19 and 20 July 1976, failed to perform duties aboard the vessel; on 24 July 1976 failed to join the vessel at Iljichevsk, U.S.S.R. At the hearing, Appellant failed to appear, and a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification was entered by the Administrative Law Judge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of EAGLE VOYAGER, the testimony of one Abdulla A. Mohsin, and a deposition of one David H. Regester, Jr., taken pursuant to order. There was no defense.Appeal No. 2140Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2141 - WADDYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 239b, and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.20-1. By order dated 31 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct and of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specifications of misconduct found proved allege that while serving as a pantryman on board the United States SS PRESIDENT MONROE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 15 July 1977, Appellant assaulted and battered with his fists one Keichi Kakuda, a waiter aboard the vessel, and on 20 July 1978, disobeyed a lawful order of the chief steward by entering a passenger area of the vessel outside working hours. The specification under 46 U.S.C. 239b alleged that Appellant had been, on 9 July 1974, convicted in the Municipal Court of Los Angeles County, California, of violation of section 11357 of the Health and Safety Code, involving possession of marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to each charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2141Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2142 - MALCOLMThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after hearing held on 22 July 1977 at Detroit, Michigan, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a tankerman on board HANNAH 2902 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 18 July 1977, Appellant did, "while said barge was transferring Bunker C at Mistersky Power Plant, Detroit, Michigan, wrongfully absent himself from said barge while transferring." At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain documents and the testimony of three witnesses. There was no defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months plus three months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 2142Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2143 - FOSTERThese appeals have been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By orders dated 3 January 1978 (CAMERON) and 6 January 1978 (FOSTER), an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Savannah, Georgia, suspended Appellant CAMERON's and Appellant FOSTER's seaman's documents, respectively, for three months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding each guilty of misconduct. The four specifications found proved allege that CAMERON, while serving as radio Officer, and FOSTER, while serving as Chief Steward, onboard SS EXPORT CHAMPION under the authority of the respective documents above-captioned, did: (First) "on or about 1000, 15 October 1977, while said vessel was anchored at Balboa, Panama Canal Zone, awaiting canal transit, absent himself from said vessel proper authorization;" (Second) "on or about 1454, 15 October 1977, when said vessel departed anchorage area to transit the canal, failed to join said vessel upon its departure;" (Third) "on or about 0900, 20 October 1977, while said vessel was moored at Garden city, Georgia, did use abusive language towards and Investigating Officer, a United States Coast Guard Officer, CWO-4 William C HENDRY and did wrongfully impede him in the performance of his official duties;" and (Fourth) "on or about 1100, 21 October 1977, did use abusive language towards a United States Shipping commissioner and wrongfully impeded a United States coast Guard Officer, Ensign Bruce P. MORELLI in the performance of his official duties."Appeal No. 2143Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/24/197811/24/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2144 - WILHELMYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 15 November 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's License for a period of one month, on probation for one year, after finding him guilty of a charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Master aboard the United States M/V SAM LAUD, Appellant did, on 4 July 1976, fail to accurately ascertain the vessel's position with due care while approaching Buffalo South Entrance Channel, Lake Erie, resulting in the grounding of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The matter came on for hearing on 12 April 1977. The Investigating Officer presented as evidence the testimony of Wilfred J. Short, a mate on watch aboard M/V SAN LAUD at the time of the incident, as well as documentary evidence. After theAppeal No. 2144Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/1/19781/1/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2145 - WALKERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 December 1976, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months plus three months on three months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an AB seaman on board the United States SS SAM HOUSTON under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) on 5 September 1976 wrongfully had intoxicants in his possession aboard the vessel at sea, and failed to perform duties, (2) on 6 September 1976, wrongfully had intoxicants in his possession at sea, and failed to perform duties, and (3) on 1 October 1976, wrongfully failed to perform duties, at Savannah, Georgia. At the hearing, Appellant did not appear, although he had requested a change of venue for his own convenience and had received due notice of the change granted and of the scheduled hearing. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2145Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/8/19791/8/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2146 - AUNEThis decision is entered in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-3 (b). By order dated 12 August 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on nine months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master of the United States SS FRANCIS S. BUSHEY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 December 1976, Appellant did wrongfully sail the vessel from Yorktown, Virginia, to New York, N.Y., in violation of "your" Certificate of Inspection; to wit, sailing without the proper complement of officers and crew. (46 U.S.C. 222). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence several documents and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2146Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/8/19791/8/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2147 - ENNOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 3 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Tampa, Florida, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as First Class Pilot on board M/V ESTHER MORAN and tank barge NEW YORK under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 January 1977, during favorable weather, conditions, Appellant, while in charge of maneuvering said vessels, did (1) negligently allow NEW YORK to be maneuvered into the Tampa Electric Company pier, Tampa, Florida, thus causing a collision between the barge and the pier and damage both to the pier and to NEW YORK, and (2) negligently cause oil to be spilled into Sparkman Channel, Tampa, Florida, as a result of the aforementioned collision between NEW YORK and the Tampa Electric Company pier. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2147Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/8/19791/8/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2148 - LEVYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 December 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Boatswain on board the United States S.S. EAGLE LEADER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 10 October 1977, while said vessel was at sea, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter James McDuff, a member of the crew. The hearing was held at Corpus Christi, Texas, in two sessions: the first on 25 October 1977; and the second on 7 November 1977. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2148Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/30/19791/30/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2149 - ENGLISHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification preferred alleged that while serving as crew pantryman on board the United States SS MANHATTAN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 June 1978, Appellant wrongfully did assault and batter by beating with his fists a member of the crew, one Younis A. Khan. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 7 June 1978. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and Appellant testified in his own behalf. When both sides had rested, the Administrative Law Judge, on his own motion, amended the specification by substituting the words "engage in mutual combat" for the words "assault and batter". At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification, as amended by him, had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of one month plus four months on twelve months' probation. The entire decision was served on 15 June 1978. Appeal was timely filed.Appeal No. 2149Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/8/19793/8/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2150 - THOMASThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 May 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The two specifications found proved allege that while serving as first assistant engineer on board the United States SS BALDBUTTE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 25 and 26 January 1978, while the vessel was shifting berths in Long Beach, Appellant did wrongfully fail to perform his duties as first assistant Engineer by being absent from the vessel without leave. The hearing was held at Long Beach from 22 February 1978 to 8 May 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2150Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/20/19793/20/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2151 - GREENThis appeal had been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 April 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for a period of four months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as able bodied seaman on board the United States SS THOMAS JEFFERSON under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant failed to perform his duties on the 0000-0400 seawatch on 1 March 1978, and again on 16 March 1978, while the vessel was at sea. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts, on 14 April 1978. Appellant was present at the hearing, but was not represented by counsel. The Administrative Law Judge advised him of his right to be so represented, but Appellant elected to proceed without counsel. Upon arraignment, Appellant pleaded guilty to the charge and specifications. Warned by the Administrative Law Judge of the possible consequences of his action, Appellant nevertheless persisted in his plea of guilty. Despite the plea, the Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of THOMAS JEFFERSON, as well as the testimony of Captain Orie F. Graves, Master of the vessel. After being reminded of his right to remain silent, Appellant chose to make a sworn statement in explanation of his guilty plea. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and two specifications had been proved by plea. He then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of four months. The entire written decision was served on 8 May 1978. Appeal was timely filed on 8 May 1978 and perfected on 12 May 1978.Appeal No. 2151Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/3/19794/3/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2152 - MAGIEBy order dated 26 January 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, after a hearing at Tampa, Florida, on 16 August and 7 September 1977, suspended Appellant's license for a period of four(4) months on probation for eight(8) months upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The two specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that while serving as operator aboard M/V ALICE ST. PHILIP while pushing ahead the barge FAUSTINA, under authority of the captioned license, Appellant did, on or about 16 April 1977, while navigating aforesaid vessel in a narrow channel, fail to keep to that side of the fairway or midchannel which lies on the starboard side of the vessel, as required by Article 25 of the Inland Rules of the Road, thereby contributing to a collision between his vessel and SS LOUISIANA BRIMSTONE in Tampa Bay, Florida, and (2) in that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did when approaching SS LOUISIANA BRIMSTONE head and head, or nearly so, fail to pass said vessel properly on the port side, after signaling his intention to do so by one short blast of his whistle for a port-to-port passing as required by Article 18 of the Inland Rules of the Road, thereby contributing to a collision between his vessel and SS LOUISIANA BRIMSTONE in Tampa Bay, Florida. The two specifications of the charge of negligence found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did in a narrow channel, by failing to keep his vessel to that side of the fairway or midchannel which lies on the starboard of his vessel, negligently collide with SS LOUISIANA BRIMSTONE in Tampa Bay, Florida, and (2) in that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did when approaching SS LOUISIANA BRIMSTONE end on or nearly so, by failing to pass said vessel properly on the port side, negligently collide with SS LOUISIANA BRIMSTONE in Tampa Bay, Florida.Appeal No. 2152Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/19/19794/19/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2153 - MCKINNEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 February 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Buffalo, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 9 months upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specifications upon which hearing was held were, after amendments made on the record: "FIRST: In that you, while serving as Master aboard EILEEN C - which was pushing the tank barge NEPCO 140, under authority of the captioned documents -- being the holder of the captioned documents, did -- on or about 23 June 1976 while said vessel was navigating the St. Lawrence River, fail to properly maintain, or to have maintained, the position of the tug, during conditions of reduced visibility due to fog, while approaching an anchorage area, resulting in the grounding of the NEPCO 140 on a shoal near LB - 217, off Mason Point, New York. "SECOND In that you, while serving as Master aboard EILEEN C, under authority of the captioned documents, being the holder of the captioned documents, did on or about 23 June 1976, while said vessel was navigating the St. Lawrence River, fail to post a person assigned the sole duty of lookout, for the purpose of keeping a proper lookout."Appeal No. 2153Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/30/19794/30/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2154 - MCKEEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 6 March 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, after hearing held at Valdez, Alaska, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master of the United States SS AMERICA SUN under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 8 December 1977, Appellant did, while the vessel "was departing the Port of Valdez, Alaska, wrongfully fail to obey an order regarding said vessel's speed issued by competent authority, to wit, the Captain of the Port, Prince William Sound, Alaska, which was issued by verbal direction of the Vessel Traffic Center." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. After hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 2154Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/11/19805/11/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2155 - HORNEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 3 March 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for 1 month on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as master aboard SS ACHILLES, under authority of his license and document, on or about 9 January 1978, wrongfully failed to plot the position of SS ACHILLES while navigating from naval anchorage "A", Narragansett Bay, East Passage, to Mount Hope Bay, Rhode Island; and (2) that Appellant while serving as master of SS ACHILLES, under authority of his license and document, "wrongfully navigated the vessel in violation of the vessel's certificate of inspection from 17 December 1977 to 9 January 1978; to wit; the vessel's tailshaft was due to be drawn no later than 31 October 1977." At the hearing, Appellant was initially represented by professional counsel, who was subsequently disqualified by the Administrative Law Judge on motion of the Coast Guard Investigating Officer. Appellant then entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2155Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/11/19795/11/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2156 - EDWARDSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 July 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after a hearing at Savannah, Georgia, on 3 May, 4 May, and 14 June 1978, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as third assistant engineer aboard the dredge M/V MANHATTAN ISLAND, under authority of the captioned documents, did at or about 1000, 18 April 1978, while the vessel was anchored in the Savannah River, Savannah, Georgia, use abusive and foul language toward the Master of the vessel, Captain Leroy A. PLATT; and(2) that Appellant, while serving as third assistant engineer aboard the dredge M/V MANHATTAN ISLAND, under authority of the captioned documents, did at or about 1210, 18 April 1978, while said vessel was moored in the Savannah River, Savannah, Georgia,wrongfully assault and batter by choking with his hands the Master of the vessel, Captain Leroy A. PLATT. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of six witnesses, three documents, and one photograph. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence the testimony of five witnesses, his own included, and five documents.Appeal No. 2156Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/25/19797/25/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2157 - KINGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 March 1973, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, North Carolina, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as utilityman on board SS JAMES under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 17 November 1972, Appellant, at Apra, Guam, wrongfully had a quantity of marijuana in his possession. The hearing was opened at Wilmington, North Carolina, on 19 December 1972. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced certain evidence and moved for the taking of testimony of two witnesses by deposition on written interrogatories. The motion was granted and the hearing was adjourned sine die. A timely notice of reconvening of the hearing was delivered to Appellant by registered mail, and the hearing was reopened as scheduled on 8 March 1973 at Wilmington. Appellant did not appear nor give notice of any kind. The hearing proceeded in absentia. After the hearing the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The decision was not served on Appellant until 28 November 1978. Notice of Appeal was timely filed on 26 December 1978.Appeal No. 2157Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/31/19797/31/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2158 - MCDONALDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 November 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, after a hearing conducted at Tampa, Florida, on 16 June and 9 August 1977, suspended Appellant's license for a period of one month and further suspended his license for an additional period of four months on probation for twelve months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The one specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant while serving as First Class Pilot aboard SS PHILLIPS WASHINGTON, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 27 March 1977, while the vessel was maneuvering in Tampa Bay, Florida, negligently order full ahead engines while the tug TONY ST. PHILIP was made fast to the stern of PHILLIPS WASHINGTON, thereby resulting in tripping and subsequent sinking of the tug TONY ST. PHILIP. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2158Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/7/19798/7/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2159 - MILICIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.301. By order dated 2 February 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months outright plus four months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an able bodied seaman on board the United States SS TRANSINDIANA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 25 June 1976, Appellant assaulted and battered another member of the crew, one Horace Serrette, also an AB seaman. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records and the testimony of Horace Serrette. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. Later, the testimony of one Morales, taken by deposition on written interrogatories, was entered in evidence by the Investigating Officer. After the hearing, the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of two months outright plus four months on twelve months' probation. The entire decision was served on 14 February 1977. Appeal was timely filed and perfected on 7 November 1977.Appeal No. 2159Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/15/19798/15/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2160 - WELLSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 19 May 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after a hearing at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 14 November, 7 December, and 28 December 1977, and 13 February and 19 April 1978, suspended the captioned documents for a period of four months and further suspended them for a period of four months on twelve month's probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege: (1) that Appellant, while serving as third mate aboard SS OVERSEAS VALDEZ, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on 9 November 1977, while the vessel was anchored in the Delaware Bay off Lewis, Delaware, wrongfully strike with his fist Thurman Young, able seaman, while in the vessel's chart room at approximately 0330 from which a fight was precipitated; and (2) that Appellant while serving as aforesaid on 9 November 1977, did wrongfully fail to obey the lawful order of the Master, Jay D. Bolton, by continuing to fight with Thurman Toung after the Master had ordered him to stop fighting.Appeal No. 2160Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19799/6/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2161 - BRONZOVICHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 March 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida after hearings at Jacksonville, Florida, on 29 November 1977 and 9 January 1978, suspended Appellant's license for two months and further suspended it for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. Six specifications of negligence had been alleged. The two specifications found proved alleged (1) that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the Tug Boat ST2127, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 14 August 1977 fail "to sound the vessel ST2127's general alarm prior to the moment of extremis [sic]," and (2) that Appellant, while serving as above, failed to maintain the vessel ST2127's double bottom fuel tanks and the after ballast tanks in a ballasted condition for optimum stability. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2161Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19799/6/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2162 - ASHFORDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 24 May 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Port Arthur, Texas, on 27 April 1978, suspended Appellant's license outright until 20 December 1978 and Apellant's merchant mariner's document outright until 20 September 1978, and further suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's document until 20 December 1978, on probation unit 20 December 1978, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard M/V GULF WATER III, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on 13 April 1978, wrongfully operate the motor vessel GULF WATER III, an uninspected towing vessel, while the captioned license was deposited in compliance with an order of suspension. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence six documents.Appeal No. 2162Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19799/6/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2163 - WITTICHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 7 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, after a hearing at Jacksonville, Florida, on 30 May 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of 6 months on probation for a period of 12 months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as second assistant engineer aboard CAROLE G. INGRAM, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on or about 25 May 1978, while in the service of CAROLE G. INGRAM and while on board the INGRAM's tow, the barge IOS 3302, which was at anchor in the St. John's River, Jacksonville, Florida, wrongfully assault and batter by paushing down onto the sand locker of said barge, a member of the crew. to wit AB Armando RODRIGUEZ. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and seven documents. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence his own testimony.Appeal No. 2163Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19799/6/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2164 - MURPHYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 February 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, after a hearing at San Francisco, California, on 15 and 30 December 1977, and 24 January 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of two months on probation for six months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The single specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as chief mate aboard SS EXXON PHILADELPHIA, under authority of the captioned documents, did on 1 December 1977, while said vessel was at Richmond Long Wharf, Chevron Oil Dock, Richmond, California, negligently fail to align the ballast transfer valves properly while ballasting the said vessel, thereby wrongfully discharging a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2164Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/7/19799/7/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2165 - BOLDSThese appeals have been taken in accordance with Title 46 United states Code 239(g) and Title 48 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By orders dated 26 October 1977 (BOLDS) and 27 October 1977 (BROOKS), an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked the seamen's documents of both Appellants upon finding each guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that BOLDS, while serving as crew messman, and BROOKS, while serving as bedroom utility, on board SS HESS VOYAGER under the authority of the respective document above captioned, did: "on or about 29 July 1977 wrongfully have in your possession certain narcotics to wit; marijuana." The cases of the Appellants were joined for a single hearing upon motion of the Investigating Officer. The hearing was held at San Juan, Puerto Rico, on 12 and 13 October 1977. The hearings were held in absentia, upon the failure of the Appellants to appear at the time and place specified, after their requests to the Administrative Law Judge for a change of venue were denied on the grounds of insufficient reasons stated in the requests. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty for each Appellant as to the charge and specification against each. Appellants were not represented by counsel in the course of the proceedings leading to the initial decisions in these cases.Appeal No. 2165Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/11/19799/11/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2166 - REGISTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, after a hearing at Jacksonville, Florida, on 25, 27, and 29 April 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of three months on probation for twelve months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The one specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant, "while serving as Pilot aboard M/V PUERTO RICO, under authority of the captioned documents, did on or about 1040, 25 March 1978, while entering the Saint Johns River from seaward, failed[sic] to reduce the speed of the M/V PUERTO RICO sufficiently in that the wake generated by said vessel was excessive and caused damage to personal property on the adjacent shoreline." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2166Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/18/19799/18/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2167 - JONESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239 (g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 May 1978, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, after a hearing at San Francisco, California, on 17 and 27 February and 30 March 1978, suspended Appellant's license and all other valid Coast Guard issued licenses for a period of three months on probation for six months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The one specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard SS SANTA MARIA, under authority of the captioned document, did, on 9 February 1978, fail to take timely action to prevent SS SANTA MARIA from running into water too shallow for her draft, thereby causing the vessel to ground in Carquinez Strait, California, on 9 February 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of four witnesses, one deposition, and four documents.Appeal No. 2167Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/17/197910/17/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2168 - COOPERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239b and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 3 October 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the Untied States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, after a hearing at Charleston, South Carolina, revoked Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document upon finding him guilty of "conviction for a narcotic drug violation." The specification found proved alleges that while the holder of the above-captioned document on 30 April 1971, Appellant was "convicted of possession of narcotics, to wit, marijuana, by the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois." At the hearing, Appellant appeared pro se and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence a certified copy of the "Complaint for Preliminary Examination" and subsequent conviction by the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, dated 20 September 1971. Appellant offered no evidence but elected to make a sworn statement in extenuation and mitigation pursuant to the provisions of 46 CFR 5.20-85(b). At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision and order was served on 6 October 1978. Appeal was timely filed on 6 October 1978, immediately after service.Appeal No. 2168Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/23/197910/23/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2169 - FOSSANIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as "Operator on board MV SUPER CAT under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 5 January 1977, Appellant committed eight assaults or assaults and batteries on, or uttered threats to, four passengers aboard SUPER CAT. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of several witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of certain witnesses and certain documents.Appeal No. 2169Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/5/197911/5/197912/21/2017
Page 13 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.