CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2404 - MCALLISTERThis appeal has ben taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York admonished Appellant upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the Tug MARJORIE B. McALLISTER under the authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 January 1983 while the tug was pushing the loaded T/B McALLISTER 80, negligently failed to navigate with due caution resulting in the grounding of the T/B McALLISTER 80 at Diamond Reef, Hudson River, New York, resulting in a gasoline spill into the Hudson River. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on various dates between May 18, 1983 and August 15, 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2404Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/9/19859/9/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2405 - LEONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 21 May 1985, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by three specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as A.B. on board the S.S. STONEWALL JACKSON, on or about 1 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by being asleep on watch; on or about 3 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by not relieving the watch; and on or about 19 February 1985 had in his possession marijuana. On 18 June 1985, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 21 June 1985.Appeal No. 2405Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19859/6/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2406 - ZOFCHAKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702, 46 CFR 5.30-1, and 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 30 August 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Key West, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the state numbered vessel FL-1263-BH under the authority of the captioned document, Appellant did, on or about 4 March 1984, wrongfully operate said vessel under the influence of alcohol. The hearing was held at Key West, Florida, on 25 and 26 July and 30 August 1984. At the hearing, Appellant elected to represent himself, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence nine exhibits including the depositions of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2406Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/11/19859/11/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2407 - GONSALVESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 6 April 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Honolulu, Hawaii, suspended Appellant's license for six months plus an additional six months remitted on 12 months' probation, upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification originally alleged that Appellant while serving as Chief Engineer aboard the F/V OCEAN PEARL under authority of the captioned license did on or about 21 November 1983 while said vessel was at sea negligently allow oxygen and starting fluid (ether) to be used to start the vessel's main engine which resulted in an explosion which fatally burned the Master and seriously burned six other crewmembers. At sessions of the hearing convened in Honolulu, Hawaii, on 17 and 18 January 1984, Appellant was absent but was represented by professional counsel.Appeal No. 2407Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/17/19859/17/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2408 - BROWNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 April 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's motorboat operator's license upon finding proved the charge of conviction of a dangerous drug law violation. The specification found proved alleged that while being the holder of the above captioned license, on or about 21 December 1981, Appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Monroe County, Florida, a court of record, for possession of marijuana. The Administrative Law Judge also found proved a second charge of misconduct and its supporting specification which alleged that Appellant, while serving under the authority of his license, on or about 19 August 1982, wrongfully made a fraudulent statement in his application for license renewal by answering "no" to the question: "Have you been convicted by any court - including military court - for other than a minor traffic violation?" The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 15 March 1985 and 9 April 1985.Appeal No. 2408Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/2/198510/2/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2409 - PLACZKIEWICZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30. By order dated 14 September 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for ten months and eighteen days upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the uninspected passenger vessel M/V DEEP SPIN, under authority of his license, on or about 26 June 1984, Appellant failed to navigate the vessel with due regard for existing conditions, while approaching a bend in the Toussaint Channel, causing the vessel to ground. The hearing was held at Toledo, Ohio, on 9 August and 12 September 1984. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. He entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2409Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/2/198510/2/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2410 - FERNANDEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 November 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Honolulu, Hawaii, suspended Appellant's license and document for three months outright plus an additional six months on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification originally alleged that while serving as third officer aboard S.S. CONSTITUTION, under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 29 September 1984. Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered by beating with fists and kicking the Chief Engineer. At the conclusion of the evidence, and subsequent to closing arguments, the Administrative Law Judge amended the specification to read that Appellant wrongfully entered into mutual combat with the Chief Engineer. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii, on 15 November 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses.Appeal No. 2410Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/3/198510/3/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2411 - SIMMONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 July 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license for one month outright upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V AMERICAN EAGLE, under the authority of the captioned document, on 20 May 1984, while the vessel was navigating San Francisco Bay in the vicinity of the San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge, appellant failed to take adequate precautions to prevent a collision with the S/V FINE FEATHER resulting in a collision with and the sinking of that vessel. The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 2 July 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2411Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/17/198510/17/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2412 - LOUVIEREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 January 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's license and document for a period of two months plus an additional three months on six months' probation upon finding proved a charge of negligence and a charge of misconduct. The specifications supporting these two charges allege that Appellant, while serving as operator of the M/V EDGAR BROWN, JR., under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 24 November 1983, negligently navigated the vessel at approximately Mile 285 of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, thereby contributing to a collision between his vessel and the T/B AMOCO VIRGINIA; and that, on the same date, he wrongfully failed to arrange a proper meeting situation with the M/V AMOCO ATLANTA at approximately Mile 285 of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 22 December 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered pleas of not guilty to both charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2412Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/18/198510/18/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2413 - KEYSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 December 1984, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as Able-bodied seaman aboard the SS SANTA ROSA, under the authority of the captioned document, on 8 July 1984: (1) failed to turn to for docking operations, and (2) had in his possession marijuana and valium. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on 21 November 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2413Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/18/198510/18/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2414 - HOLLOWELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 December 1984, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as Able-bodied seaman aboard the SS SANTA ROSA, under the authority of the captioned document, on 8 July 1984: (1) failed to turn to for docking operations, and (2) had in his possession marijuana and valium. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on 21 November 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2414Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/27/198511/27/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2415 - MARSHBURNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 13 February l984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for three months on six months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the Tug CHAUNCY [sic], under the authority of the captioned document, on 26 August 1983, while the vessel was navigating the Alligator River - Pungo River Canal, NC, Appellant maneuvered his flotilla - the towing vessel and two nonpropelled barges - resulting in an collision between the lead barge and the Fairfield Swing Bridge. The hearing was held at Wilmington, North Carolina, on 15 September 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2415Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/27/198511/27/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2416 - MOOREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CAR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 30 May 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V THERESA SELEY, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 1 September 1983, did fail to operate the vessel in safe and prudent manner in the area of miles 956-959, Ohio River, to wit, operating said vessel in the above river area when its draft exceeded the channel project depth, resulting in damage to and subsequent pollution from the vessel. The hearing was held at Paducah, Kentucky, on 1 November 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and supporting specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2416Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19861/3/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2417 - YOUNGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 24 January 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct and upon finding him incompetent to serve on board merchant vessels of the United States. The misconduct charge is supported by six specifications which allege that Appellant, while serving as Able-Bodied Seaman aboard the TT BAY RIDGE under the authority of his document, on or about 1 January 1984, did wrongfully: (1) fail to perform his prescribed duties as lookout while the TT BAY RIDGE was underway in the Pacific Ocean; (2) fail to obey a lawful order of the Third Officer who was on the bridge and ordering [sic] him in the capacity of the Bridge Watch Officer to return to his lookout duty; (3) fail to obey the orders of the Master when told to accompany him to his office for logging at 2100 hours: (4) create a disturbance on the bridge of the TT BAY RIDGE by verbally confronting the Bosun while he was performing the duties of Helmsman on the 2000 to 2400 bridge watch;Appeal No. 2417Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19851/3/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2418 - DOUGHERTYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 24 April 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for three months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Operator board the M/V JAMES E. NIVIN, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 8 February 1984, failed to operate his vessel so as to avoid alliding with the mooring cell on the Kentucky side of the Portland Canal in Louisville, Kentucky. The hearing was held at Louisville, Kentucky, on 25 April 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits.Appeal No. 2418Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/11/19862/11/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2419 - MURPHYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 17 May 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for two months outright plus an additional two months on eight months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant,while serving as Operator aboard the M/V JOE BOBZIEN, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 6 January 1985, navigated his tow in such a manner as to cause the tow to collide with the fleeted barges at Mile 808.5, Ohio River, left descending bank. The hearing was held at Evansville, Indiana, on 20 February 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2419Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/3/19863/3/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2420 - LENTZ.This appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 25 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license for twelve months outright plus an additional three months on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Operator aboard the M/V CAPT DARCE, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 25 August 1984, while the vessel was underway in San Pedro Bay with the barge SPARTAN 110 in tow, negligently failed to maintain a proper lookout. A second specification, alleging a failure to navigate the CAPT DARCE with due caution, thereby causing an allision between the barge SPARTAN 110 and the anchored P/C GOOD ID, was found not proved. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 22 October 1984, 20 November 1984 and 6 February 1985.Appeal No. 2420Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/18/19863/18/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2421 - RADERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 April 1985, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license for two months outright upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the TUG WESTERN COMET, under the authority of the captioned document, on 26 April 1984, Appellant failed to maintain a proper lookout, contributing to a collision with a pleasure vessel on the Willamette River at approximately river mile 3.5. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington, on 5 February 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence ten exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2421Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/25/19863/25/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2422 - GIBBONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 4 March 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's document for six months outright plus an additional six months' suspension on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The notice of hearing, charge and specifications set forth two charges of misconduct, each supported by one specification. At the outset of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge amended the charges by substituting in lieu thereof a single charge of misconduct supported by the two specifications. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as Boatswain aboard the M/V COVE SAILOR, under authority of the captioned document, (1) did on or about 27 January 1985, the said vessel being at sea, wrongfully assault and batter an Able Bodied Seaman by striking him in the throat and kicking him in the stomach, head and back, and (2) did on or about 25 January 1985, wrongfully assault the Chief Pumpman by making threatening remarks. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas, on 4 February 1985. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty on Appellant's behalf to the charge and each specification. The hearing was conducted in absentia.Appeal No. 2422Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/2/19866/2/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2423 - WESSELLSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J.). By order dated 13 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license for one month on three months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Chief Engineer aboard USNS CONTENDER T-AGOS-2, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 22 September 1984, while said vessel was moored in Oakland, California, wrongfully fail to perform his duties due to intoxication. The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 9 October 1984 and 13 February 1985. On 9 October 1984, Appellant did not personally attend the hearing but he was represented by professional counsel. Counsel entered a plea of not guilty on Appellant's behalf to the charge and supporting specification. Appellant was present with counsel when the hearing reconvened on 13 February 1985.Appeal No. 2423Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19866/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2424 - CAVANAUGHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct and a charge of being a user of a dangerous drug. The specifications supporting these two charges allege that Appellant, while serving under authority of the captioned document on board the SS CONSTITUTION did, on or about 1900 24 February 1984 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully use cocaine and at the same time and place, being holder of the captioned document, was a user of and did use cocaine. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii, on 10, 23 and 24 March 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence two exhibits, his own testimony, and the testimony of four additional witnesses.Appeal No. 2424Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/6/19866/6/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2425 - BUTTNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 December 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Almadea, California, suspended Appellant's license for three months remitted on nine months' probation upon finding proved the charged of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot aboard the S.S. CORNUCOPIA, under the authority of the captioned document, on 1 June 1984, Appellant navigated the vessel in a negligent manner, resulting in an allision with and the dragging off-station of the San Francisco Bay, Blossom Rock Buoy (LLNR 592). The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 5 and 18 September 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2425Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19866/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2426 - FUTCHERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 24 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by four specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as Pilot/Mate on board the M/V CAPE MAY, on or about 31 July 1985 wrongfully fraternized with a 14-year-old female passenger, wrongfully engaged in undue familiarity with a 14-year-old female passenger, wrongfully engaged in sexual intercourse with a 14-year-old female passenger, and wrongfully failed to exclude a 14-year-old female passenger from the pilot hose and bridge of the vessel, as prohibited by 46 CFR 78.10-1. On 3 April 1986, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 7 April 1986. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the denial of a temporary document.Appellant urges that the administrative Law Judge erred in finding the specifications proved and in revoking Appellant's license and document. Appellant contends further that he should be issued a temporary license because he cannot be presumed to be a hazard to the navigation of any vessel.Appeal No. 2426Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/21/19867/21/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2427 - JEFFRIESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 29 August 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and incompetence. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications. The first alleged that, under the authority of the captioned documents aboard the SS EDGAR M. QUEENY, on or about 1 June 1985, Appellant had in his possession alcoholic beverages, to wit, beer and rum. The second misconduct specification alleged that, at the same place and time, Appellant wrongfully rendered himself unfit to stand his scheduled watch due to intoxication. The incompetence charge was supported by a single specification alleging that, while serving as Third Assistant Engineer aboard the SS EDGAR M. QUEENY under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1 June 1985, Appellant was and presently i incompetent to perform duties as third engineer due to alcoholism. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 23 July and 15 August 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the first misconduct specification, and pleas of not guilty to the second misconduct specification and the incompetence charge and specification.Appeal No. 2427Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/29/19858/29/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2428 - NEATThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 July 1958, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of "narcotics conviction." The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 12 June 1987, Appellant was convicted by the Twenty-fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana, a court of record, for knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: marijuana. A second charge, alleging misconduct, was found not proved. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 23 July 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits.Appeal No. 2428Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/7/19868/7/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2429 - ROBERTSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot aboard the Greek flag M/V VERGO, under the authority of the captioned documents, on 4 September 1984, Appellant piloted the vessel on the Delaware River from Fairless Steel Works, Trenton, New Jersey, to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, an are beyond the scope of his license. Aa second charge, alleging negligence, was found not proved and was dismissed. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 28 March, 18 April, and 8 May 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2429Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/5/19868/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2430 - BARNHARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification supporting the charge alleges that Appellant, while serving as pumpman on board the SS LION OF CALIFORNIA, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 19 April 1985 at Berth 118, Los Angeles Harbor, wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics, to wit: marijuana. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 10 and 24 May 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2430Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/4/19868/4/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2431 - HERNANDEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 28 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's document for one month outright plus an additional two months' suspension on ten months' probation upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and inattention to duty. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as person in charge aboard T/B NMS 1906, under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1655, 27 January 1985, (1) did fail to insure that the cargo tank butterworth covers were securely shut prior to cargo transfer resulting in an oil spill into the Calcasieu River (33 CFR 156.120(e)), and (2) did transfer oil from said barge without the required oil transfer procedures. The inattention to duty specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did fail to insure both of the required fire extinguishers were in serviceable condition prior to cargo oil transfer. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 19 February 1985. At the hearing, Appellant appeared without professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence two exhibits. The Administrative Law Judge rendered a written Decision and Order on 28 February 1985. He concluded that the charge and specifications of misconduct and the charge and specification of inattention to duty had been proved and suspended Appellant's document for one month outright plus an additional two months' suspension on ten months' probation.Appeal No. 2431Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/21/19868/21/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2432 - LEONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.SC. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 18 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by three specifications which alleged that appellant, while serving as A.B. on board the S.S. STONEWALL JACKSON, on or about 1 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by being asleep on watch; on or about 3 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by not timely relieving the watch; and on or about 19 February 1985 had in his possession marijuana. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 19 March, 2 April, 24 April, 15 May, and 21 May 1985. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified on his own behalf, and introduced in evidence one exhibit and the testimony of one additional witness.Appeal No. 2432Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/4/19869/4/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2433 - BARNABYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 3 February 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charges of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation" and "misconduct." The first specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 22 December 1978, Appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois for possession of cannabis, a dangerous drug with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: marijuana. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while making application to the U.S. Coast Guard Regional Examination Center, Toledo, Ohio for renewal of his license, misrepresented the particulars of his prior record by failing to reveal a prior conviction for possession of cannabis.Appeal No. 2433Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/22/19869/22/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2434 - CORVELEYNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 7 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license for six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of Violation of Regulation. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master aboard the S.S. AMERICAN SPITFIRE, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 17 December 1985, Appellant sailed from Midway Island in the Pacific Ocean with incompatible cargo stowage in hold no. 2. The specification further alleges that certain Class X-A explosives were incompatibly stowed with certain Class VII explosives, in that the two were separated by a structure made of wood boards that did not meet the minimum requirements for a partition bulkhead, in violation of 46 CFR 146.29-51(a) and (b), the chart accompanying 46 CFR 146.29-99 and 46 CFR 146.29-100, and the definition of a partition bulkhead at 46 CFR 146.29-11(c)(36). A second specification also alleging a violation of regulation was found not proved and was dismissed by the Administrative Law Judge.Appeal No. 2434Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/1/198610/1/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2435 - BABERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 22 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 12 August 1983, Appellant was convicted by the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida for possession of cocaine, in violation of F.S. 893.03(2)(a)(4) and F.S. 893.13(1)(e). The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 22 January 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits. Appellant introduced in evidence one exhibit and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2435Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198610/14/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2436 - STAFFNEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 1 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month, remitted on three months' probation, upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, between 22 and 27 January 1985, wrongfully operated the vessel ZENOVIA carrying passengers for hire while the vessel was documented exclusively for pleasure, in violation of 46 CFR 67.45-19. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, during the same time period, wrongfully operated the ZENOVIA carrying passengers for hire while liquified petroleum gas was used, in violation of 46 CFR 25.45-1(a), 46 CFR 147.03-11 and 46 CFR 147.05-100 Table S.Appeal No. 2436Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198610/14/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2437 - SMITHThis review has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart K. By order dated 25 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Respondent's license for three months on twelve months probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Respondent, while serving as Operator aboard the M/V STEEL CHALLENGER, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 15 January 1985, failed to maintain adequate control of his vessel and tow thereby allowing the tow to allide with the Greenville Highway Bridge at Mile 531.3, Lower Mississippi River. That order was appealed. On appeal, the Vice Commandant issued an order in which he set aside the finding of the Administrative Law Judge as to the charge of negligence, vacated the order suspending Respondent's license, and remanded the case to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings. Appeal Decision 2437 (SMITH). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge reopened the hearing. The reopened hearing was held at Memphis, Tennessee, on 3 March 1987.Appeal No. 2437Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/25/198711/25/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2438 - TURNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 19 July 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for six months upon finding proved the charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence specifications found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V GULF QUEEN, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 9 March 1985 fail to sound proper whistle signals, while said vessel was at anchor in an area of restricted visibility, at or near 28°55'N and 92°52'W in the Gulf of Mexico. The misconduct specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, on or about 8 March 1985, proceed on a voyage of greater than 12 hours, without the required number of licensed operators on board, at or near 28°55'N and 92°52'W in the Gulf of Mexico. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 15 April 1985. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications.Appeal No. 2438Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/24/198611/24/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2439 - FREDERICKSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 22 September 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V NATIVE SON, on or about 26 April 1986 negligently failed to keep clear while overtaking another vessel, and negligently crossed the bow of another vessel, thus endangering the life, limb and property of the passengers and crew aboard the two vessels. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while in preparation for a trip from St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands to Tortola, British Virgin Islands, on or about 10 May 1986, failed to give a safety orientation prior to getting underway or to have placards posted as required by 46 CFR 185.25-1(d), and while acting in the same capacity on the same date failed to have on board and available for inspection his license as required by 46 CFR 185.10-1.Appeal No. 2439Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198612/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2440 - LYONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 3 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for one year outright, plus an additional three months on eighteen months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Pilot on board the M/V FEDERAL CALUMET, on or about 25 November 1985, wrongfully directed the movement of the vessel while under the influence of an intoxicant. On 13 October 1986, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary license pending approval. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 22 October 1986.Appeal No. 2440Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/198612/10/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2441 - HESTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 September 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 15 December 1983, Appellant was convicted by the State of Mississippi, Circuit Court of Jackson County, of possession of marijuana. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 25 September 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel. The Administrative Law Judge entered on Appellant's behalf an answer of denial to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits.Appeal No. 2441Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/198612/10/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2442 - ALLBRITTENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 6 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month remitted on three months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE, under the authority of the captioned document, while the vessel was towing the barge GULF FLEET 263 and navigating in conditions of fog and restricted visibility on the St. Johns River, failed to navigate the vessel with caution causing the barge to strike the Buckman Bridge. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 2 August; 5, 13 and 20 September; and 2 October 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2442Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/16/198612/16/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2443 - BRUCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 28 April 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license outright for one month, plus an additional six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE, under the authority of the captioned document, failed to properly attain and/or use available weather information prior to proceeding to sea with the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE and the tow GULF FLEET 263, contributing to the failure of the towing connection and grounding of the barge GULF FLEET 263. A second specification under the charge of negligence, alleging a failure to properly examine towing gear, was found not proved and was dismissed. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 21 and 30 January 1986.Appeal No. 2443Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/5/19871/5/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2444 - RABATSKYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 11 July 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the united States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for three months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on or about June 26, 1985, Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V JOHN M. SELVICK, under the authority of the captioned document, operated the vessel and two on Lake Michigan during a period of darkness without ensuring that the tow was equipped with adequate navigational sidelights as required by Rules 22 and 24 of the Inland Navigational Rules. The hearing was held at Chicago, Illinois on 20 March 1986. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence ten exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2444Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/10/19872/10/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2445 - MATHISONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 16 January 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for two months, remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V BELCHER PENSACOLA, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 20 July 1984, after an underwater survey and the unauthorized repair of tank barge Belcher No. 35 at Key West, Florida, wrongfully failed to make known to officials designated to enforce inspection laws, at the earliest opportunity, a marine casualty producing serious injury to said tank barge in violation of 46 USC 3315. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida. on 13 March 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2445Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19873/6/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2446 - WATSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 11 July 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for four months outright plus an additional four months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on or about September 1, 1985, Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V ETTA KELCE, under the authority of the captioned document, failed to post a proper lookout, a violation of Rule 5 of the Inland Rules of the Road, at approximately Mile 44 on the Kanawha River, West Virginia. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri on 15 April 1986. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and denied the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2446Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/19/19873/19/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2447 - HODNETTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 16 January 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for two months, remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by two specifications. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V BELCHER PENSACOLA, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 18 July 1984, wrongfully failed to give notice as soon as possible to the nearest Coast Guard Marine Safety Office of the accidental grounding of tank barge Belcher No. 35, under tow of the BELCHER PENSACOLA, as required by 46 CFR 4.05-1. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while acting in the same capacity, on or about 19 July 1984, after an underwater survey and the unauthorized repair of tank barge Belcher No. 35 at Key West, Florida, wrongfully failed to make known to officials designated to enforce inspection laws, at the earliest opportunity, a marine casualty producing serious injury to said tank barge.Appeal No. 2447Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/10/19874/10/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2448 - POWERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 29 May 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month outright, plus and additional two months remitted on nine months' probation upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and negligence. The specification under the misconduct charge alleges that while serving as Docking Pilot aboard the M/V VERGO, under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1 September 1984, Appellant piloted the vessel in Newbold Channel, Delaware River, an area beyond the scope of his license. The specification under the negligence charge alleges that, while serving in the same capacity on the same date, Appellant caused the vessel to ground in the Delaware River. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 26 March and 16 April 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2448Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19876/8/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2449 - VANRIGHTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 June 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for six months outright, plus an additional six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported buy two specifications, both of which were found proved. The first specification alleged that on or about 17 January 1986, Appellant, while serving as second assistant engineer aboard the SS OVERSEAS ALASKA, under the authority of the captioned documents, while the vessel was at sea and Appellant was on watch, wrongfully failed to obey the direct order of the first assistant engineer in that Appellant failed to leave the engine room area and go to the operating platform. The second specification alleges that Appellant, on the same date and while serving in the same capacity, wrongfully assaulted the first assistant engineer with a hammer, and assaulted and battered the first assistant engineer with his fists, resulting in injury to the first assistant engineer.Appeal No. 2449Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19876/8/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2450 - FREDERICKSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 701. By order dated 22 September 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V NATIVE SON, on or about 26 April 1986 negligently failed to keep clear while overtaking another vessel, and negligently crossed the bow of another vessel, thus endangering the life, limb and property of the passengers and crew aboard the two vessels. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while in preparation for a trip from St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands to Tortola, British Virgin Islands, on or about 10 May 1986, failed to give a safety orientation prior to getting underway or to have placards posted as required by 46 CFR 185.25-1(d), and while acting in the same capacity on the same date failed to have on board and available for inspection his license as required by 46 CFR 185.10-1.Appeal No. 2450Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/11/19876/11/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2402 - POPEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5. 30-1. By order dated 27 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's license for a period of two months plus an additional four months on eighteen month's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while navigating the M/V CITY OF GREENVILLE under the authority of his license on or about 2 April 1983, Appellant failed to maintain proper control of his vessel and tow resulting in an allision with the Poplar Street Bridge at mile 179.2 of the Upper Mississippi River. The hearing was held at Memphis, Tennessee from 6 to 9 December 1983. At the hearing, appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2402Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/2/19858/2/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2392 - BUSINELLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 July 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license and document for one month plus an additional two months on six months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master aboard the M/V POINT CHALEUR, under authority of the captioned documents, Appellant did, on or about 4 May 1984, operate the M/V POINT CHALEUR without a licensed chief engineer on board as required by the vessel's Certificate of Inspection. The hearing was held at Corpus Christi, Texas, on 5 June 1984. At the hearing, Appellant elected to represent himself and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence his own testimony and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2392Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/13/19856/13/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2393 - STEWARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-l. By order dated 3 August l982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for two months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as undocking master on board the M/V AL-TAHA, under authority of the captioned license on 19 January 1982, Appellant did navigate the M/V AL-TAHA aground on a charted shoal in Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. The hearing was conducted in Boston, Massachusetts, on 12 and 14 April and 3 May 1982. At the hearing Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and eighteen exhibits.Appeal No. 2393Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/5/19857/5/198512/7/2017
Page 7 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.