CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2052 - NELSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 December 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three (3) months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. Under the charge of negligence the specifications found proved allege that while serving as pilot aboard the M/V GEORGE PRINCE under the authority of the license above captioned, on 4 February 1974 Appellant wrongfully failed to (1) keep out of the way of a privileged vessel in a crossing situation, (2) timely slacken speed, stop, or reverse to avoid collision with a privileged vessel in a crossing situation, (3) keep a proper lookout, and (4) adequately utilize electronic navigational equipment available to him for the purpose of effecting a safe passage across the Mississippi River at about mile 120.7 above Head of Passes, all of which contributed to a collision between the M/V GEORGE PRINCE and the M/V F. R. BIGELOW and tow. Under the charge of misconduct the specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot aboard the M/V GEORGE PRINCE under the authority of the license above captioned, on 4 February 1974 Appellant wrongfully failed to sound a one whistle signal as required by 33 U.S.C. 344, while in a condition covered by that section. A second specification under the charge of misconduct, alleging that Appellant failed to sound the danger signal as required by 33 U.S.C. 344, was found not proved by the Administrative Law Judge.Appeal No. 2052Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/22/19763/22/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2131 - NUNEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 August 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while acting under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant altered the license by changing the date of issue from 22 February 1972 to 22 February 22 1973. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and documents relative to the issuance of license no. 103934. In defense, Appellant offered an unsworn statement. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 22 August 1977. Appeal was timely filed.Appeal No. 2131Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/4/19788/4/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2115 - CHRISTENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 19 August 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a messman on board the SS American Corsair under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 January 1971, Appellant: (1) wrongfully assaulted the saloon pantryman, Charles G. Pace, with intent to do harm by setting fire to his mattress while he was sleeping upon same; (2) wrongfully threatened to blow up the vessel, said vessel being the carrier of a cargo of military explosives; and (3) wrongfully lit matches on the main deck of said vessel with full knowledge that the vessel was carrying military explosives, and further, that said actions were deliberate. A fourth specification that Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties due to intoxication was found not proved. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2115Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/24/19783/24/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2175 - RIVERAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 18 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Juan, Puerto Rico, suspended Appellant's license for one month and for an additional two months on four months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant while serving as Pilot aboard SS PONCE DE LEON, under authority of his license and document, on 7 December 1976 negligently navigated SS PONCE DE LEON without the use of available tugboats while the vessel was attempting to negotiate the turn from Army Terminal Channel to Puerto Nuevo Channel, Bahia de San Juan, Puerto Rico, thereby contributing to a collision between the PONCE DE LEON and Puerto Nuevo Terminal Dock. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2175Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19801/3/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2080 - FULTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 18 July 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the SS NOTRE DAME VICTORY under authority of the license and document above captioned, on 30 Jaunuary 1975, Appellant did hazard his vessel by proceeding up the Delaware River in an unsafe manner without assistance of tugboats when the vessel's ship's service generator was inoperable and the portable 500 kw generator was operating in an unreliable manner and there were no immediate backup ship's service generating capabilities. A second charge concerning an improper logging was dismissed. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2080Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/8/197610/8/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2215 - RILEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 January 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, on 29 November 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of one month on probation for three months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard GULF FLEET NO. 22, under authority of the captioned documents, did, from 10 to 24 November 1978, fail to comply with the manning requirements as set forth in the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, to wit: sailing without a licensed engineer and one able seaman. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of one witness and four documents.Appeal No. 2215Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/29/19805/29/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2212 - LAWSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months outright, plus a further suspension for six months on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification alleged that while serving as Ordinary Seaman on board SS AMERICAN LIBERTY under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 29 March 1979, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter a member of the crew, Luis A. Lopez, Z-819 077. The lesser included offense of wrongfully engaging in mutual combat with a member of the crew was found proved. The hearing was held at New York, after a change of venue from Savannah, Georgia, on 4, 6, and 25 April 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2212Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19805/23/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2102 - GABLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license and Merchant Marine documents for two months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of the charge of "negligence." The specification found proved alleges that while serving as First Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS EAGLE LEADER, under authority of the license and document above captioned, the Appellant "did on or about 18 March 1976 at approximately 1600 negligently energize the feedback circuit breaker on the generator switchboard thereby allowing 440 volts A.C. power from the emergency generator to flow to the main switchboard in the engine room creating a dangerous arc, all the while knowing that the main switchboard was disabled from an electrical casualty the day before and that engineering personnel were working in the vicinity of the main switchboard making a survey of the damage."Appeal No. 2102Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2183 - FAIRALLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(G) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 April 1978, and administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of two specification of the charge of misconduct. The two specifications of misconduct found proved allege that Appellant, while serving aboard the SS MAYAGUEZ under authority of the above captioned document, (1) did, on 6 February 1977, wrongfully use foul and abusive language towards a superior officer, the Chief Mate, and (2) did, on 18 February 1977, while said vessel was in the Port of Keelung, Taiwan, wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Mate, by kicking him repeatedly. At the hearing, appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence eight document including the depositions of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered the testimony of three witnesses, including his own. Subsequent to the hearing the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in open hearing in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order of revocation.Appeal No. 2183Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/21/19802/21/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2041 - SISKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 May 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for the three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification as found proved alleges that while serving as operator of the towboat M/V JOSEPH M. JONES, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 26 February 1975, Appellant negligently overtook the M/V T.M. NORSWORTHY and tow and negligently attempted at Mile 636, Ohio River to pass it under circumstances involving risk of collision and without the assent or knowledge of the Pilot of the T.M. NORSWORTHY, which was then engaged in a difficult and dangerous flanking maneuver to round a bend under conditions of very high water and strong currents. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specificationAppeal No. 2041Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/29/197510/29/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2225 - LAWRENCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 March 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida , after a hearing at Cleveland, Ohio, on 14 February 1979, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard M/V SAM LAUD, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on or about 14 January 1979, while said vessel was in the port of Cleveland, Ohio, wrongfully fail to give notice of a marine casualty involving his vessel to the nearest Marine Inspection Office of the Coast Guard, to wit, Marine Safety Office, Cleveland, Ohio. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The investigation Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five documents.Appeal No. 2225Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2133 - SANDLINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 June 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master of SS LASH ITALIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 March 1976, Appellant neglected and failed to navigate the vessel with due caution which resulted in grounding of said vessel in Fort Sumter Channel, Charleston, South Carolina. A specification of "Misconduct," alleging that Appellant had wrongfully failed to give notice of that grounding in timely fashion was dismissed as not proved. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2133Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/25/19789/25/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2112 - HOMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 December 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States Tug HUDSON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 23 August 1976, Appellant navigated his tow in a negligent manner such as to cause his tow to come in contact with the Long Island Bridge. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence CG Form 2692 Tug HUDSON, O.N. 249639, C.G. Form 2692 - Crane BARGE NO. 6, and a copy of U. S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey Chart No. 13270 39th Ed., 1 March 1975 of Boston Harbor. LT William MILLER, USCG, the casualty investigation officer, testified for the Investigating Officer.Appeal No. 2112Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/14/197711/14/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2093 - BOOHERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 16 April 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Corpus Christi, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman documents. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a wiper on board the United States SS OVERSEAS ANCHORAGE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 December 1975, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a fellow crew member, Donald Gusis, with a deadly weapon, to wit, a pipe, while the vessel was at Novorossiysk, USSR. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of the SS OVERSEAS ANCHORAGE; an injury report concerning Mr. Gusis; sketches of the room occupied by Gusis and Booher; the weapon allegedly used; the testimony of the victim; and sworn statements of three crew members.Appeal No. 2093Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/28/19771/28/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2144 - WILHELMYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 15 November 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's License for a period of one month, on probation for one year, after finding him guilty of a charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Master aboard the United States M/V SAM LAUD, Appellant did, on 4 July 1976, fail to accurately ascertain the vessel's position with due care while approaching Buffalo South Entrance Channel, Lake Erie, resulting in the grounding of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The matter came on for hearing on 12 April 1977. The Investigating Officer presented as evidence the testimony of Wilfred J. Short, a mate on watch aboard M/V SAN LAUD at the time of the incident, as well as documentary evidence. After theAppeal No. 2144Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/1/19781/1/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2097 - TODDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 May 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Mobile, Alabama suspended Appellant's seaman document for 6 months outright plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an Oiler on board the United States SS JAMES LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 October 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully failed to obey a lawful order of the vessel's Third Assistant Engineer; (2) wrongfully struck the Third Assistant Engineer; and, (3) wrongfully struck the Chief Engineer. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2097Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/7/19773/7/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2111 - JENSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 January 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after hearing held at Port Arthur, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for two months plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as chief mate on board the United States SS TEXACO NORTH DAKOTA under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 2 and 3 October 1973, Appellant wrongfully failed to supervise the tank cleaning operations in progress which produced a combustible gas mixture accumulation in the after pumproom resulting in an explosion and fire while said vessel was underway in the Gulf of Mexico. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2111Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/20/19779/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2190 - RITOLAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States code 239(g) and Title 46 code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 February 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license for one month with an additional period of six months' suspension on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The three specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Third Mate on board the United States Army Corps of Engineers Dredge CHESTER HARDING, under the authority of the above captioned license, on or about 12 December 1976, Appellant failed to sound a whistle signal in reply to the whistle signal of M/V DON CARLOS; failed to execute a port passage with DON CARLOS in the absence of an agreement on a starboard passing; and failed to indicate the intent of his vessel while approaching DON CARLOS, the first two specifications further alleging that the failure cited contributed to a collision between the two vessels. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written opinion in which he concluded that the charge and specifications had been proved. He then entered an order suspending Appellant's license for one month with an additional six month period of suspension on twelve months' probation. The entire decision was served on 16 February 1979. Appeal was timely filed and perfected.Appeal No. 2190Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/25/19803/25/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2181 - BURKEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 February 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, after a hearing at Galveston, Texas, on various dates between 31 May 1977 and 6 January 1978, revoked the captioned documents upon finding Appellant mentally incompetent. The original specification of mental incompetence found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as second mate aboard SS MISSOURI, on or about 3 November 1973, while the vessel was at sea, was, and presently is, mentally incompetent to perform the duties for which he holds a license and document issued by the Coast Guard. This hearing was conducted pursuant to the order of the National Transportation Safety Board No. EM-51, 2 NTSB 2784(1976). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2181Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/11/19802/11/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2220 - LAMBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 14 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, after a hearing at Baltimore, Maryland, on 8, 24, and 25 May 1979, ordered Appellant admonished upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard tug NANTICOKE, under authority of the captioned documents, did, on 15 February 1979, while said vessel was under his command, knowingly transit the Nanticoke River with the barge DEBORAH from Seaford, Delaware, to Nanticoke River Buoy No. 4 (LLP 410), in violation of U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port of Baltimore order NR 05-79, during the hours of darkness, and without sufficient horsepower. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2220Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19806/12/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2138 - HARDSAWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 13 October 1977, as amended 17 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as OPERATOR on board the TUG COLUMBIA, O/N 516116 under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 15 September 1977, Appellant did negligently fail to correctly ascertain the height of his tow prior to attempting to pass under the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and as a result of that negligence collided with the Bridge causing damage to the Bridge and the tow. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the unsworn statements of the Appellant and one witness, and three items of documentary evidence.Appeal No. 2138Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/8/197811/8/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2083 - SYBIAKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 13 February 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Third Mate on board the SS TRENTON under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 20 January 1975, Appellant (1) wrongfully failed to perform his duties by reason of being under the influence of liquor; and (2) wrongfully failed to perform his duties by departing his station to wit: the engine order telegraph which was the duly appointed station. The hearing was held pursuant to the in absentia regulations. A plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification was entered by the Judge. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of LCDR Larry J. Balok with respect to what transpired on 24 January 1975 when the charge and specifications were preferred.Appeal No. 2083Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/28/197610/28/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2187 - CASTLEBERRYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 13 April 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able seaman on board SS SANTA MARIANA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 8 December 1978, Appellant wrongfully had in his possession at San Francisco, California, a quantity of cocaine. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, from 22 May to 15 June 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and certain documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 14 August 1979. Appeal was timely filed and perfected.Appeal No. 2187Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/25/19802/25/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2104 - BENSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 November 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's license for 2 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while serving as a crewmember on board the M/V Thomas C.L. NUGENT while holding license above captioned, on or about 27 August 1976, Appellant wrongfully discharged oily bilge slops into the navigable waters of the United States, to wit, the Ohio River near Mile 572.0, causing a sheen upon the water's surface, a violation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public Law 92-500 (86 Stat. 816). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. No evidence was introduced.Appeal No. 2104Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/20/19775/20/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2085 - RICHARDSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 March 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the SS VANTAGE HORIZON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 14 December 1975, Appellant, while navigating on Chesapeake Bay, during conditions of fog and restricted visibility did wrongfully fail to obtain or properly use information available to him from radar observations to determine the course and speed of another vessel detected in his vicinity. A second part of the specification found not proved and stricken from the specification prior to Appellant's case in chief was that the error contributed to a collision between his vessel and M/V DAEYANG PROSPERITY. A second specification alleging that Appellant did wrongfully fail to navigate his vessel with caution was found not proved. A third specification alleging that Appellant did wrongfully fail to navigate his vessel at a moderate speed was also found not proved.Appeal No. 2085Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/24/197611/24/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2177 - HOMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, after a hearing at Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 April 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of two months and further suspended it for one month on probation for 12 months. The two specifications of the charge of negligence found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard Tug KING PHILIP, under authority of the captioned documents, did on 1 April 1978, attempt to transit Cape Code Canal without assessing properly the effects that the tidal current in the Canal would have on his vessel and its tow, Tank Barge RHODE ISLAND; and (2) in that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did ground the Tank Barge RHODE ISLAND; and on the northern edge of Cape Cod on 1 April 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2177Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19801/3/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2100 - COLEMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 July, 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license for one month outright plus two months on four months's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Engineer on board the United States SS AMERICAN EAGLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 19 February 1976, Appellant was negligent in his duties, which resulted in a spillage of fuel oil into Corpus Christi Harbor, Coastal States Petrochemical Company Dock, Nueces County, Texas, to wit: allowing the starboard settling tank to overflow. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and pertinent documentary materials.Appeal No. 2100Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/26/19774/26/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2087 - MOURIKISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 12 January 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for one month outright plus one month on three months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Master on board the SS CONNECTICUT under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 15 June 1975, Appellant did neglect to take the necessary precautious required by the ordinary practice of seamen (Article 29, Inland Rules of the Road), to wit: attempt to navigate a light vessel in a restricted channel during unfavorable weather, thereby causing a collision with the (Liberian) M/V ST PANTELEIMON, in the Houston Ship Channel, at Robertson Terminal, Galena Park, Texas. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2087Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/17/197612/17/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2129 - RENFROThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four months outright plus four months on eight months's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as operator of the towboat MISS SYLVIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 July 1976, Appellant: (1) failed to keep out of the way in a crossing situation of the downbound vessel SEA HARMONY at New Orleans in the Mississippi River; (2) negligently entered the Mississippi River with his tow without regard to "existing traffic," "causing a collision between the tow and SEA HARMONY;" and (3) negligently cause a medium "oil pollution spill" and damage to SEA HARMONY At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2129Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/27/19787/27/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2132 - KEENANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 January 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct in a hearing held at Corpus Cristi, Texas, on 21 December 1970. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS OVERSEAS PROGRESS under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 18 December 1970, Appellant wrongfully engaged in acts of sexual perversion with two other (named) members of the crew of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and pleaded guilty to the charge and specification. The Administrative Law Judge warned Appellant of the seriousness of the misconduct charged but Appellant, with concurrence of counsel, persisted in the plea. The Investigating Officer made a statement as to the facts as to which evidence was available and Appellant, through counsel, pleaded for leniency on the grounds that he was intoxicated at the time of the occurrences.Appeal No. 2132Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/13/19789/13/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2053 - STEPHENSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 October 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as able bodied seaman on board the M/V PRESQUE ISLE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 26 June 1975, Appellant was wrongfully absent from his vessel and duties, assaulted and battered the master on two separate occasions, and disobeyed a lawful order of the master on two separate occasions. As the hearing was held in absentia, the Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the oral testimony of two witnesses, and affidavit of service, and pertinent extracts form the vessel's logbook and articles of agreement.Appeal No. 2053Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/21/19764/21/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2229 - KELLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 November 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for six months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved allege that while serving as master on board the United States M/V VINCENT TIBBETTS, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 August 1977, Appellant: (1) failed properly to navigate the vessel between Long Island and Portland Harbor, Maine, with a resultant grounding of the vessel on Cow Island; (2) did "fail to notify U.S. Coast Guard Personnel about the grounding on Cow Island on or about 10 August 1977", and (3) failed to maintain a proper-lookout. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine, on 17 August 1977.Appeal No. 2229Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/18/19808/18/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2194 - HARTLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 1 September 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended the above captioned license and document for one month on twelve months' probation upon finding Appellant guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator aboard M/V BUCCANEER under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 0945, 9 August 1978, Appellant did operate BUCCANEER off Boothbay Harbor, Maine, in a manner to endanger life, limb and property in proceeding to pass close aboard at excessive speed the lobster boat SUZIE B, ME 2005A, endangering life, limb and property of Charles Brewer. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine on 24 August 1978. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and three exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered the testimony of one witness and an exhibit which was made a part of the record solely for use in mitigation if the charge were found proved.Appeal No. 2194Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/26/19803/26/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2092 - KOKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 1 July 1976, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Honolulu, Hawaii, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an Able Seaman on board the SS OGDEN CHALLENGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 13-18 August 1975, Appellant did wrongful use foul and disrespectful language and gestures to the Chief Officer, did wrongfully disobey a lawful order of the Chief Officer, did on three occasions wrongfully fail to perform regularly assigned duties, and did wrongfully fail to join his vessel upon her departure from Alexandria, Egypt, on 18 August 1975. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a certified extract from the Shipping Articles of the SS OGDEN CHALLENGER, excerpts of the Official Log Book and the Mate's Log Book, the depositions of the Master and Chief Mate of the vessel, and a copy of a message from the American Embassy of Cairo, Egypt.Appeal No. 2092Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/28/19771/28/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2044 - ZOLEZZIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order and decision dated 27 June 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license and all other merchant mariner's documents for three months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of the charge of "violation of a statute." The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the F/V MARY ANTOINETTE, O/N 523763, a vessel of over 200 gross tons, under authority of the license above captioned, from 15 April 1975 to 16 May 1975, Appellant did willfully employ or engage to perform the duties of mate aboard that vessel, a person or persons not licensed to perform such duties in violation of 46 U.S.C. 224a, for a fishing voyage on the high seas which began in Acajutla, El Salvador on 15 April 1975 and terminated on 16 May 1975 in San Diego, California.Appeal No. 2044Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/22/197512/22/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2224 - HUGHESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1 By order dated 14 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's documents outright for three months, plus three additional months for violation of probation imposed in a prior proceeding, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Pilot on board the M/V CHIGUSA MARU under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 6 July 1979, while said vessel was enroute from San Francisco Bay to Pittsburgh, California, Appellant: (1) failed to maintain control of said vessel, resulting in its grounding; and (2) failed to maintain control of said vessel, resulting in a collision with and destruction of an established U.S. aid to navigation. The hearing was held at San Francisco on 27 September and 3, 4, 5, and 31 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2224Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/24/19807/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2058 - SEARSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1 and 3 By order dated 21 October 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman documents for three months plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an operator on board the uninspected towing vessel MAUREEN MORAN under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 20 September 1975, Appellant: (1) wrongfully absented himself from the wheelhouse for a period of approximately 15 minutes, leaving the responsibilities of navigation of the vessel and its tow to an unlicensed deckhand, thereby contributing to a collision between the tow and a pier, and (2) failed to post a proper lookout, notwithstanding the fact that the vessel was being navigated from the lower wheelhouse and the light barge in tow alongside to port partially obstructed vision from the wheelhouse on the port side, thereby contributing to the collision. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification of misconduct and not guilty to the charge and specification of negligence.Appeal No. 2058Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/10/19765/10/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2037 - SABOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30, now 5.30. By order dated 8 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an A.B. on board the United States SS FREDERICK LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant; (1) did on or about 24 September 1974, while said vessel was in the port of Malili, Indonesia, wrongfully have intoxicating liquor in his possession; (2) did on or about 7 October 1974, while said vessel was in the Port of Bangkok, Thailand, wrongfully fail to perform his duties;Appeal No. 2037Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/23/19759/23/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2025 - ARMSTRONGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulation 137.30-1, now 5.30-1. By order dated 12 September 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for one month on three months' probation and revoked his operator's license outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that, on or about 11 1973, Appellant wrongfully, knowingly, and fraudulently submitted and signed a false application for an original towboat operator's license at the USCG Marine Safety Office, Norfolk, Virginia, to wit: Appellant indicated on said application that he never had been convicted by any court including a military court, for any offense other than a minor traffic violation when in fact he had a past history of several major criminal convictions before different state courts. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2025Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19756/5/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2121 - GIBBLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 11 May 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as ordinary seaman on board the United States SS ARCO PRESTIGE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 March 1977, Appellant, while the vessel was at sea did wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics, to wit, marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and seven exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony and the testimony of one witness. On 11 May 1977 the Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and the specification had been proved. He then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision and order was served on 14 May 1977.Appeal No. 2121Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19775/23/197712/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2130 - BARTLOWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code Federal Regulation 5.30-1. By order dated 28 July 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, North Carolina, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a steward utility on board SS AMERICAN RANGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 June 1977, Appellant wrongfully used abusive and profane language toward the vessel's First Assistant Engineer, Joseph Czarnecki. A second specification that Appellant wrongfully assaulted the First Assistant Engineer by brandishing his fist in a threatening manner and offering to inflict bodily harm was found not proved. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence relevant extracts of the ship's log, and the testimony of Joseph Czarnecki and Lawrence J. Grembocki.Appeal No. 2130Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/28/19787/28/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2265 - CAREYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 April 1980, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's document and all other valid Coast Guard documents for three (3) months on six (6) months' probation, upon finding him guilty of wrongful failure to join his vessel. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able bodied seaman aboard SS BEAVER STATE under authority of the document above captioned, on 24 November 1978, Appellant wrongfully failed to join his vessel off Labuan, Malaysia. The hearings were held at Long Beach, California, on 11 December 1979, and 8 January, 20 March and 11 April 1980. At the hearings on 11 December 1979 and 11 April 1980, Appellant appeared pro se, having been advised of his right to be represented by counsel of his choice and having waived this right at the hearing on 11 December 1979. At the hearing on 8 January 1980, the disposition of John Manning was taken on behalf of Appellant without Appellant or counsel present. At the brief hearing on 20 March 1980, the proceedings were continued, at Appellant's prior request, to 11 April 1980. At the hearing on 11 December 1979, Appellant had entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications.Appeal No. 2265Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/10/19819/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2237 - STRELICThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license number 388 977 and all other valid Coast Guard licenses issued to Appellant for three (3) months on twelve (12) month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board SS AMOCO CONNECTICUT, under authority of the license and document above captioned, on or about 20 December 1978, Appellant negligently failed to ensure that the vessel's position was fixed and plotted on a chart of the area, Narragansett Bay, which is a part of the navigable waters of the United States. The hearings were held at Providence, Rhode Island, on 16 January, 13 March, 22 May and 10 July 1979. At the hearings, Appellant was represented by counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence an Affidavit of Service of the Charge Sheet; Charts of Narragansett Bay (No. 13223), Martha's Vineyard (No. 13218), and Providence River (No. 13224); the testimony of LT William J. Morani; the deposition of Francis J. Smith, Second Mate; and log entries of the AMOCO CONNECTICUT for 19 and 20 December 1978.Appeal No. 2237Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/26/19812/26/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2344 - KOHAJDAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By Order dated October 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved that while serving as ordinary seaman on board the SS PENNY under the authority of the above captioned document, while the vessel was at the Port of Tamatave, Madagascar, Appellant did: (1) On or about 0500 on 11 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty of opening cargo hatches; (2) On or about 0500 on 16 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty of opening cargo hatches; (4) On or about 1300 and 1330 on 18 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty as gangway watch, and was discovered aft of the liverpool house out of sight of the gangway; (5) On or about 0000 to 0050 on 25 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty as gangway watch; (6) On or about 0230 and 0430 on 25 Dec 1981, fail to perform his duty as gangway watch in that he was found asleep in the crew's messroom; (8) On or about 30 Dec 1981, assault and batter with his fists the vessel's Master, and threaten to kill said Master; (9) On or about 30 Dec 1981, assault the Chief Mate by threatening to kill him.Appeal No. 2344Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/28/19843/28/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2255 - BASIRThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated October 10, 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months, plus 4 months on 12 months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Able Seaman on board SS DELTA BOLIVIA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 2 December 1978, Appellant failed to perform his duties because of intoxication; failed to obey direct orders of the Third Mate and of the Chief Mate; wrongfully consumed alcoholic beverages aboard DELTA BOLIVIA, and used foul and abusive language toward the Third Mate. The hearing was held on 15 February, 3 and 5 April, 11, 14, and 29 May, and 11 and 28 June 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer submitted three exhibits and the sworn testimony of four witnesses. In defense, Appellant submitted eight exhibits and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2255Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/918112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2324 - AMATAGAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 June 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as utilityman on board the SS SANTA MARIA under the authority of the captioned document, on 20 October 1981, Appellant wrongfully possessed marijuana. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California on 6 January, 29 January, 4 February, 24 March and 5 April 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four documents and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of one witness. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved and entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The Decision and Order was served on 12 July 1982. Appeal was timely filed on 28 July 1982 and perfected on 7 April 1983.Appeal No. 2324Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/16/19839/16/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2245 - ROBINSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 February 1980, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after hearings at New York, New York, on 29 November and 18 December 1978, and on 24 January, 14 February, 14 March, 9 May, 4 and 27 June, 9 and 16 July, 17 August, 19 September, and 7, 19 and 26 November 1979, revoked the captioned document upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct proved, alleges that Appellant, while serving as Fireman/Watertender aboard USNS ANDREW MILLER, under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document, did, at or about 2400, 12 March 1975, at Yokosuka, Japan, while said was in the port of Yokosuka, Japan, wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics to wit, heroin. Appellant appeared and was represented by counsel. No formal arraignment was held and no plea appears on the record of any of the hearings. It is clear that the proceedings were conducted as if a "not guilty" plea had been entered. Appellant was fully advised of the charges and specifications against him and of his rights. As in Decision on Appeal No. 867, there was no prejudice to Appellant because the hearing was conducted as though a plea of "not guilty" had been entered.Appeal No. 2245Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/29/19814/29/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2141 - WADDYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 239b, and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.20-1. By order dated 31 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct and of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specifications of misconduct found proved allege that while serving as a pantryman on board the United States SS PRESIDENT MONROE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 15 July 1977, Appellant assaulted and battered with his fists one Keichi Kakuda, a waiter aboard the vessel, and on 20 July 1978, disobeyed a lawful order of the chief steward by entering a passenger area of the vessel outside working hours. The specification under 46 U.S.C. 239b alleged that Appellant had been, on 9 July 1974, convicted in the Municipal Court of Los Angeles County, California, of violation of section 11357 of the Health and Safety Code, involving possession of marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to each charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2141Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/9/197811/9/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2113 - HINDSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's seaman's licenses for 1 month outright plus 2 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master/First Class Pilot on board the United States SS SPARTAN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 12 August 1976, Appellant: (1) wrongfully failed to obtain or properly use information available from radar observations, for the purpose of determining the safe course into Ludington Harbor, Michigan. (2) wrongfully failed to reduce the speed of his vessel during conditions of fog and restricted visibility.Appeal No. 2113Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/28/19782/28/197812/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2077 - FARMERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 January 1969 a Hearing Examiner, (now Administrative Law Judge) of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a fireman/watertender on board the United States SS YOUNG AMERICA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 11 August 1967, Appellant was wrongfully and unlawfully in possession of marijuana, a legally defined narcotic drug. Appellant did not enter an appearance at the hearing, after due notice of the time and place thereof. The Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification in Appellant's behalf. Appellant was not represented by counsel, but had been notified of his right to such representation.Appeal No. 2077Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/24/19769/24/197612/21/2017
Page 7 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.