CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2150 - THOMASThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 May 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The two specifications found proved allege that while serving as first assistant engineer on board the United States SS BALDBUTTE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 25 and 26 January 1978, while the vessel was shifting berths in Long Beach, Appellant did wrongfully fail to perform his duties as first assistant Engineer by being absent from the vessel without leave. The hearing was held at Long Beach from 22 February 1978 to 8 May 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2150Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/20/19793/20/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2166 - REGISTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, after a hearing at Jacksonville, Florida, on 25, 27, and 29 April 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of three months on probation for twelve months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The one specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant, "while serving as Pilot aboard M/V PUERTO RICO, under authority of the captioned documents, did on or about 1040, 25 March 1978, while entering the Saint Johns River from seaward, failed[sic] to reduce the speed of the M/V PUERTO RICO sufficiently in that the wake generated by said vessel was excessive and caused damage to personal property on the adjacent shoreline." At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2166Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/18/19799/18/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2364 - CAMPANAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 August 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as wiper on board the United States S.S. PRESIDENT PIERCE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 1600, 21 April 1983, Appellant did wrongfully disobey a lawful order of the First Engineer, Roy A. Carlson, in that he refused to pick up debris. The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 8 August 1983. Appellant did not appear at the hearing and was not represented. The hearing proceeded in absentia. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty on behalf of Appellant. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits.Appeal No. 2364Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/10/19847/10/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2051 - DESVAUXThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 February 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month outright plus four months on fifteen months' probation upon finding her guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as rooms messman and crew messman on board SS YOUNG AMERICA under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant: (1) and (2) on 27 July 1974 wrongfully showed disrespect to the Master of the vessel by means of letters addressed to him; (3) on 31 July 1974 wrongfully addressed the Chief Officer with profane and disrespectful language; (4) on 28 July 1974, acted in a disrespectful manner to the Radio Officer through words and gestures; and (5) on 31 July 1974, assaulted and battered the radio officer by striking him with her hands.Appeal No. 2051Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/19/19763/19/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2149 - ENGLISHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 June 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification preferred alleged that while serving as crew pantryman on board the United States SS MANHATTAN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 June 1978, Appellant wrongfully did assault and batter by beating with his fists a member of the crew, one Younis A. Khan. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 7 June 1978. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and Appellant testified in his own behalf. When both sides had rested, the Administrative Law Judge, on his own motion, amended the specification by substituting the words "engage in mutual combat" for the words "assault and batter". At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification, as amended by him, had been proved. He then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of one month plus four months on twelve months' probation. The entire decision was served on 15 June 1978. Appeal was timely filed.Appeal No. 2149Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/8/19793/8/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2330 - STRUDWICKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that on or about 28 January 1980, Appellant was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in cannabis by the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County Florida. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida on 9 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2330Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/7/198310/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2264 - MCKNIGHTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 December 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's Operator's License for two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Operator on board the Tug Holly under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 March 1980, Appellant negligently absented himself from the wheelhouse of the said vessel, leaving the responsibilities of navigation of the said vessel and its tow to an unlicensed deckhand, Woodard Willis, thereby contributing to the said vessel's collision with the N.C. Highway #58 Bridge across the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at approximately Mile 225.9. The hearing was held at Wilmington, North Carolina, on 28 August 1980. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2264Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/8/19819/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2178 - HALLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 August 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license for two months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator of M/V GRANDE, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 3 July 1978, Appellant negligently allowed passengers to throw trash and debris over the side in violation of the Refuse Act of 1899. At the hearing Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the oral testimony of two witnesses. In defense Appellant introduced the oral testimony of three witnesses, including his own, and three photographs.Appeal No. 2178Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/3/19801/3/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2286 - SPRAGUEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 April 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania issued an order of admonition to Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved, alleges that while serving as CHIEF ENGINEER on board the SS COVE NAVIGATOR under authority of the license above captioned, between 3 January 1981 and 24 February 1981, Appellant failed to notify the Coast Guard, as required by the Certificate of Inspection, that the boiler management system was not operating properly. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on 25 March 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four documents and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2286Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198210/14/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2274 - SMARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1 By order dated 28 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Tankerman on board the Crowley Barge 4 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 16 June 1981, Appellant wrongfully smoked a cigarette on the weather deck of said vessel while not in a gas free condition at Long Beach Berth 233 while bunkering the M/V ORIENTAL EXECUTIVE. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 6 and 16 July 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence one document, and an agreed stipulation of facts. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of two witnesses, including his own, and documentary exhibits.Appeal No. 2274Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/5/19825/5/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2333 - AYALAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1 By order dated 21 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman's document for four months, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able seaman on board the United States SS MORMACSAGA under authority of the document above captioned, on 11 October 1979, Appellant assaulted and battered Simon Flax, the Boatswain, by striking him with a "4x4" wooden board. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 27 November, 3 and 14 December 1979, 17 and 20 January and 13 February 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. After the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. The entire decision was served on 31 May 1980. Appeal was timely filed on 13 June 1980 and perfected on 8 October 1980.Appeal No. 2333Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198312/5/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2354 - DITMARSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) 46 CFR 5.30-1 and 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 26 May 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Miami, Florida, revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding proved the charge of convict ion for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the license above captioned, on or about 23 December 1982 Appellant was convicted of knowingly, intentionally, and unlawfully possessing a controlled substance, to wit, marijuana. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida on 26 May 1983. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigation Officer introduced in evidence five documents including a copy of the judgement of conviction of the New Jersey Superior Court, Mercer County, in the case State of New Jersey v. Gary Neal Ditmars, and a true copy of the indictment filed in the same ease.Appeal No. 2354Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2167 - JONESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239 (g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 May 1978, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, after a hearing at San Francisco, California, on 17 and 27 February and 30 March 1978, suspended Appellant's license and all other valid Coast Guard issued licenses for a period of three months on probation for six months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The one specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard SS SANTA MARIA, under authority of the captioned document, did, on 9 February 1978, fail to take timely action to prevent SS SANTA MARIA from running into water too shallow for her draft, thereby causing the vessel to ground in Carquinez Strait, California, on 9 February 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of four witnesses, one deposition, and four documents.Appeal No. 2167Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/17/197910/17/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2171 - DEIBANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239 (g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 21 December 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after a hearing at New York, suspended Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document for a period of nine months and further suspended his document for and additional period of three months on probation for twelve months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a wiper on board SS MARINE EAGLE, under authority of the above captioned document, Appellant on or about 5 August 1976 wrongfully assaulted and battered Arthur T. Rudder, the Assistant Engineer, and that Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered Arthur T. Rudder with a dangerous weapon. Appellant was represented by professional counsel at the hearing. The proceedings were interpreted form English to Appellant's native language, Arabic, for Appellant's benefit. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the depositions of the victim and another eyewitness to the alleged incident. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence and undated statement of the Chief Officer of MARINE EAGLE which purports to reflect the oral unsworn statement of Appellant with respect to the alleged incidents.Appeal No. 2171Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/6/197911/6/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2603 - HACKSTAFFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7702 and 46 C.F.R. § 5.701. By order dated 8 June 1993, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard at San Diego, California revoked Appellant's License and Merchant Mariner's Document upon finding proved the charge of use of dangerous drugs. The single specification supporting the charge alleged that, on or before 16 March 1993, Appellant used marijuana, based upon a urine specimen collected on that date which subsequently tested positive for the presence of marijuana metabolites. A hearing was held at San Diego, California on 27 May 1993. Appellant appeared with professional counsel by whom he was represented throughout the hearing and this appeal. Appellant denied the charge and specification per 46 C.F.R. § 5.527. The Investigating Officer (IO) introduced into evidence five exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. After the government rested, and after the ALJ denied Appellant's motion to dismiss, Appellant testified in his own behalf and introduced three exhibits. At the end of the hearing, the ALJ rendered an oral decision in which he found that the charge and specification were proved. The ALJ's written decision and order were entered on 8 June 1993 and were served on Appellant on 25 June 1993. Appellant filed notice of appeal on 14 June 1993. Appellant perfected his appeal by filing a brief on 16 November 1993, within the filing requirements of 46 C.F.R. § 5.703. Thus this appeal is properly before me. Appearance: David W. Tiffany, attorney for Appellant, Centerside Tower I, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 1108, San Diego, CA 92108, (619) 528-2335.Appeal No. 2603Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/10/19988/10/199811/28/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2472 - GARDNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. #7702 and 46 CFR #5.701. By order dated on 28 September 1987, an Administrarive Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended, on six months probation, Appellant's Merchant Mariner's License and Document for a period of one month upon finding proved a Charge of Misconduct, supported by one specification. The specification found proved under the Charge of Misconduct alleged that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard the ferry CONE JOHNSON, under the authority of the captioned license and document, did, at or about 2:49 PM local time on 21 June 1987. while overtaking a sailing vessel on Galveston Bay, a navigable waterway of the United States, fail to keep out of the way of the overtaken vessel as required by Rule 13 of the Inland Navigation Rules, to wit: the ferry CONE JOHNSON's passage did cause the operator of the sailing vessel to lose control of his vessel.Appeal No. 2472Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/6/19878/6/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2562 - BEARThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. # 7702 and 46 C.F.R. # 5.701. By an order dated December 5, 1992, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Honolulu, Hawaii, revoked Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document and License upon finding proved a charge of use of dangerous drugs. The single specification supporting the charge alleged that, on or about November 18, 1991, Appellant wrongfully used cocaine as evidenced by a urine specimen collected on that date pursuant to a pre-employment drug test program by his prospective employer, Hawaiian Tug and Barge Corporation. . The hearing was convened in Honolulu, Hawaii, on June 3, 1992, and then reconvened on December 5, 1992, after a continuance requested by Appellant. Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a response denying the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer offered 13 exhibits into evidence, nine of which were admitted. One of these exhibits [I.O. Ex. 13] was a "Litigation Package" from Nichols Institute that contained 11 documents concerning the testing and re-testing of Appellant's urine sample. The Investigating Officer also introduced the testimony of one witness. Appellant introduced 5 exhibits into evidence and introduced the testimony of two witnesses, one of whom testified by a written stipulation entered into between the Investigating Officer and Appellant. In addition, Appellant testified under oath in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2562Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/1/19953/1/199511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2363 - MANNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S. Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's Seaman's License for three months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the M/V CAPTAIN HORNBLOWER, under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did on 16 and 17 February 1981, while carrying 66 and 48 passengers respectively between the hours of 1900 and 2300 each day, wrongfully operate said vessel, a non-Coast Guard certificated vessel, in violation of the provisions of 46 U.S.C. 390c(a). The hearing was held at san Francisco, California, on 2 March, 2 April, 7 April, 1 May, 7 May, 24 June, and 7 July 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2363Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2567 - PEREIRAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S. C. 7702 and 46 C.F.R. 5.701. By order dated August 12, 1993, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia suspended Appellant's document outright for six months, with a further six months' suspension on twelve months probation, upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The sole specification supporting the charge alleged that Appellant, while serving as QMED-Electrician aboard M/V PFC WILLIAM B. BAUGH, O.N. 674269, under authority of his document, on September 2, 1992, while said vessel was at Diego Garcia, British Indian Ocean Territory (B.I.O.T.), wrongfully submitted falsified work reports for fan tests. A hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on July 28, 1993. Appellant did not appear at the hearing, nor was he otherwise represented during the proceedings. After inquiry on the record as to the facts of service of the charge and notice of the hearing, the ALJ permitted the hearing to proceed in absentia, as provided in 46 C.F.R. 5.515.The ALJ denied the charge and specification on behalf of the Appellant as provided in 46 C.F.R. 5.527. The Investigating Officer (IO) introduced into evidence ten exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. A letter from Appellant seeking to change the date and location of the hearing was introduced as an exhibit for Appellant. The ALJ had previously denied Appellant's request by letter. TR at 20, ALJ Ex. I. At the end of the hearing, the ALJ rendered an oral decision in which he found that the charge and specification were proved. Appellant filed notice of appeal on August 27, 1993, apparently based on a telephone call through which he learned of the ALJ's oral decision. The ALJ's written decision and order were entered on September 15, 1993, and were served on Appellant some time prior to September 24, 1993.Appeal No. 2567Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/20/19956/20/199511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2530 - GULLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 7702 and 46 C. F. R. 5.701. By an order dated 8 January 1990, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York revoked Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document upon finding proved the charge of use of dangerous drugs. The single specification supporting the charge alleged that, on or about 9 February 1990, Appellant was tested and found to be a user of a dangerous drug, to wit: cocaine. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 30 October 1990. The Investigating Officer introduced one exhibit into evidence and introduced the testimony of one witness. Appellant appeared prose and testified in his own behalf. Appellant entered a response of "deny" to the charge and specification as provided in 46 C. F. R. 5.527. The Administrative Law Judge's written order revoking Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document was entered on 8 January 1990 (It is noted that this is an administrative error. The date should read "1991"). The decision and order was served on Appellant on 17 January 1991. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on 11 February 1991. Upon request, a transcript of the proceedings was served on Appellant on 8 April 1991. Appellant submitted a brief on 17 June 1991, having received an extension of the filing deadline. Accordingly, this matter is properly before the Commandant for review.Appeal No. 2530Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/8/199111/8/199111/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2369 - ASHLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license for two months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V ELDORADO under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 1400, 22 January 1983, Appellant failed "to maneuver his vessel with caution, placing it in risk of a collision with the SS EXXON GALVESTON, and making it necessary for the SS EXXON GALVESTON, which was to the right in a crossing situation, to make an emergency maneuver." The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 10 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2369Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/22/19848/22/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2370 - LEWISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V EXXON CRYSTAL RIVER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 February 1983, Appellant negligently failed to safely navigate a flotilla consisting of the M/V EXXON CRYSTAL RIVER and EXXON BARGE NUMBER 32, resulting in an allision between the flotilla and the Koch Oil Terminal Pier in Newport News, Virginia. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 17 March 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2370Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/5/19849/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2396 - MCDOWELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 October 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while navigating the M/V ANANGEL SPIRIT under the authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 November 1983 while approaching the MacArthur Lock, in the St. Marys River failed to maintain control of the M/V ANANGEL SPIRIT by allowing it to sheer into the path of the M/V INDIANA HARBOR resulting in the M/V ANANGEL SPIRIT colliding with the M/V INDIANA HARBOR. The hearing was held at St. Ignace, Michigan, on 15 December 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2396Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/11/19857/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2424 - CAVANAUGHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct and a charge of being a user of a dangerous drug. The specifications supporting these two charges allege that Appellant, while serving under authority of the captioned document on board the SS CONSTITUTION did, on or about 1900 24 February 1984 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully use cocaine and at the same time and place, being holder of the captioned document, was a user of and did use cocaine. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii, on 10, 23 and 24 March 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence two exhibits, his own testimony, and the testimony of four additional witnesses.Appeal No. 2424Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/6/19866/6/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2464 - FUTCHERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. 46 CFR SS5.701. By order dated 24 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by four specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as Pilot/Mate on board the M/V CAPE MAY, on or about 31 July 1985 wrongfully fraternized with a 14- year-old female passenger, wrongfully engaged in undue familiarity with a 14-year-old female passenger, wrongfully engaged in sexual intercourse with a 14-year-old female passenger, and wrongfully failed to exclude a 14-year-old female passenger from the pilot house and bridge of the vessel, as prohibited by 46 CFR 78.10-1. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 11 December 1985, 5 February 1986 and 18 February 1986.Appeal No. 2464Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2440 - LYONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 3 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for one year outright, plus an additional three months on eighteen months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Pilot on board the M/V FEDERAL CALUMET, on or about 25 November 1985, wrongfully directed the movement of the vessel while under the influence of an intoxicant. On 13 October 1986, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary license pending approval. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 22 October 1986.Appeal No. 2440Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/198612/10/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2426 - FUTCHERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 24 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by four specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as Pilot/Mate on board the M/V CAPE MAY, on or about 31 July 1985 wrongfully fraternized with a 14-year-old female passenger, wrongfully engaged in undue familiarity with a 14-year-old female passenger, wrongfully engaged in sexual intercourse with a 14-year-old female passenger, and wrongfully failed to exclude a 14-year-old female passenger from the pilot hose and bridge of the vessel, as prohibited by 46 CFR 78.10-1. On 3 April 1986, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 7 April 1986. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the denial of a temporary document.Appellant urges that the administrative Law Judge erred in finding the specifications proved and in revoking Appellant's license and document. Appellant contends further that he should be issued a temporary license because he cannot be presumed to be a hazard to the navigation of any vessel.Appeal No. 2426Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/21/19867/21/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2439 - FREDERICKSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 22 September 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V NATIVE SON, on or about 26 April 1986 negligently failed to keep clear while overtaking another vessel, and negligently crossed the bow of another vessel, thus endangering the life, limb and property of the passengers and crew aboard the two vessels. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while in preparation for a trip from St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands to Tortola, British Virgin Islands, on or about 10 May 1986, failed to give a safety orientation prior to getting underway or to have placards posted as required by 46 CFR 185.25-1(d), and while acting in the same capacity on the same date failed to have on board and available for inspection his license as required by 46 CFR 185.10-1.Appeal No. 2439Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198612/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2318 - STRUDWICKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 9 February 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." Also on 9 February 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 15 February 1983. Decision on Appeal 2311 (STRUDWICK) of 17 May 1983 VACATED the Administrative Law Judge's order of 15 February 1983 and REMANDED the request for a temporary license for a new decision. By his order of 24 May 1983 the Administrative Law Judge again denied Appellant's request for a temporary license. BASIS OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge of 24 May 1983 denying a temporary license. Appellant urges that the denial was based on an erroneous interpretation of 46 CFR 5.30-15(b) and 46 CFR 5.03-5(b) prohibiting the issuance of temporary licenses and documents in cases involving those offenses listed in 46 CFR 5.03-5(b) as being deemed to affect the safety of life and property at sea.Appeal No. 2318Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/31/19838/31/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2329 - FIFER IIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 8 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." On 17 March 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 24 March 1983. Decision on Appeal 2315 (FIFER) of 6 June 1983 VACATED the Administrative Law Judge's order of 24 March 1983 and REMANDED the request for a temporary license for a new decision. By his order of 20 June 1983 the Administrative Law Judge again denied Appellant's request for a temporary license.Appeal No. 2329Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/7/198310/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2401- CAVANAUGHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 31 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct and a charge of being a user of a dangerous drug. The specifications supporting these two charges allege that Appellant, while serving under authority of the captioned document on board the SS CONSTITUTION did, on or about 1900 24 February 1984 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully use cocaine and at the same time and place, being holder of the captioned document, was a user of cocaine. On 16 April 1985, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary document. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 19 April 1985.Appeal No. 2401Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2397 - GEWANTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 27 March 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman's license and document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, on or about 15 January 1984, on board the M/V GOLDEN MOON wrongfully had in his possession marijuana and, at the same time and place, wrongfully had in his possession a pistol. On 10 April 1985, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary license and document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 12 April 1985.Appeal No. 2397Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/15/19857/15/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2405 - LEONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 21 May 1985, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by three specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as A.B. on board the S.S. STONEWALL JACKSON, on or about 1 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by being asleep on watch; on or about 3 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by not relieving the watch; and on or about 19 February 1985 had in his possession marijuana. On 18 June 1985, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 21 June 1985.Appeal No. 2405Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19859/6/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2343 - WILLIAMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 21 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's mariners document upon finding proved the charge of "possession of marijuana aboard the SS INGER." On 31 August 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from then Order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary document. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order dated 16 November 1983. Appellant's delay in filing the notice of appeal was caused by Hurricane Alicia. It will therefore be considered timely. BASIS OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge of 16 November 1983 denying a temporary document. Appellant advances no grounds for his appeal. OPINION The Administrative Law Judge's interpretation of the regulations and my Decisions on Appeal is not correct insofar as he concludes that temporary licenses or documents may not be issued following a finding that one of the offenses listed in 46 CFR 5.03-5(b) has been proved.Appeal No. 2343Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19843/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2315 - FIFERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 18 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." On 17 March 1983 Appellant file a Notice of Appeal from the Order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 24 March 1983. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge denying a temporary license. It is urged that Appellant's service on board a vessel is compatible with the requirements for safety of life and property at sea and Appellant's prior record justifies the issuance of a temporary license. I note that these are the criteria for issuing a temporary license set forth in 46 CFR 5.30-15 and that the Administrative Law Judge did not address them in his denial.Appeal No. 2315Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/6/19836/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2339 - HOOTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.25-15. By order dated 11 December 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license for six months, on twelve months probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as a Licensed Operator aboard the P/C SEA HOOK, under the authority of the license above captioned on or about 19 July 1980, and 8, 19, 21, 23, 27 and 28 September 1981, Appellant transported passengers for hire onboard a foreign-built vessel, between Auke Bay, Alaska, and the vicinity of Point Retreat, Alaska. The hearing was held at Juneau, Alaska, on 17 November 1981. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and presented his evidence which consisted of his oral testimony. He offered neither documentary evidence, not evidence by deposition. He called no witnesses. The Investigating Officer presented the testimony of two witnesses as well as six documents.Appeal No. 2339Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/18/19841/18/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1994 - TOMPKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance wit Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 23 December 1972, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 4 months outright plus 2 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an oiler on board the United States SS IBERVILLE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 8,9,10, and 11 November, 1972, Appellant did wrongfully absent himself from the vessel without permission and did wrongfully fail to perform his assigned duties. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certified copies of the Official Logbook entries and an extract of the Shipping Articles of the SS IBERVILLE.Appeal No. 1994Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/4/19742/4/197412/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2311 - STRUDWICKThis appeal has been take in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 9 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." Also on 9 February 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the Order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 15 February 1983. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge denying a temporary license. It is urged that the denial was erroneously based on a regulation existing in 1957 which no longer exists and a decision based on that regulation instead of on the current regulations.Appeal No. 2311Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/17/19835/17/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2057 - SHIPPThis appeal had been taken is accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 October 1974, as amended by the supplemental order of 2 December 1974, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for two months outright plus three months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as an operator on board the United States M/V J.F. LAMB under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 July 1974, Appellant neglected to take the necessary precautions required by the practice of seamen (Article 29, Inland Rules of the Road), to wit: navigating the tug and its laden tow outside the navigable waters of the Bayport Channel, Galveston Bay, Texas, resulting in a collision with a submerged object and subsequent sinking of the tank barge TM-10, and that Appellant negligently caused a spill of No. 6 fuel oil into the navigable waters of the United States, Bayport Channel, Galveston Bay, Texas.Appeal No. 2057Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/3/19765/3/197612/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2317 - KONTOSThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 January 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked the seaman's document of Appellant, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an ordinary seaman aboard S/S LNG TAURUS under authority of his document above captioned, Appellant did on 20 November 1981 while S/S LNG TAURUS was in the port of Arun, Indonesia: (1) wrongfully fail to perform his duties by reason of intoxication; (2) assault and batter by beating with his fists a member of the crew, the Third Mate, Scott L. Ervin; (3) Assault and batter by biting on the lower leg a member of the crew, the Cargo Control Officer, William G. LANGELY; and (4) wrongfully damage the seawater temperature gauge and a light fixture with a chair in the Cargo Control Room. On 25 November 1981 the charges were served and the hearing was set for 13 January 1982. On 2 December 1981 Appellant telephoned the Administrative Law Judge requesting an earlier hearing sometime before Christmas. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request because the principal witnesses, were to be at sea between Indonesia and Japan until January 1982. Appellant was duly notified of this denial and the reasons for it by the Administrative Law Judge. The hearing was held in absentia at Boston, Massachusetts on 13 January 1982.Appeal No. 2317Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/31/19838/31/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2192 - HEUERThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 7 March 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, after a hearing on various dates between 22 July 1977 and 9 March 1978, suspended Appellant's license for a period of three months on probation for twelve months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The single specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as pilot aboard SS SABINE, under authority of the captioned document, did, on or about 3 June 1977, at or near Chalmette Algiers Ferry Crossing, lower Mississippi River, negligently operate said vessel by overtaking SS SITALA without having received an assenting whistle signal as is required by the ordinary practice of seamen. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of four witnesses and eight documents.Appeal No. 2192Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/24/19803/24/198012/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2267 - ERVASTThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 June 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, revoked Appellant's captioned license upon finding him guilty of negligence and incompetence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Third Mate on board SS PIONEER COMMANDER under authority of the license above captioned Appellant was negligent: (1) on 11 January 1980, during his 0800 1200 watch, by failure to fix the vessel's position, while transiting the San Bernadina Straits, R.P.; (2) on 11 January 1980, during his 2000 to 2400 watch, by failure to fix the vessel's position while transiting the Sibuyan Sea, R.P.; (3) on 24 January 1980, during his 2000 to 2400 watch, by failure to locate the navigation light control panel in order to secure the anchor lights and energize the navigation lights; (4) on 31 January 1980, during his 0800 to 1200 watch, by failure to fix the vessel's position while navigating from Pusan to Chin Hae, Korea; (5) on 31 January 1980, during his 0800 tp 1200 watch, by failure to take anchor bearings to fix the vessel's position after anchoring at Chin Hae, Korea; (6) on 3 February 1980, during his 2000 to 2400 watch, by failure to accurately fix said vessel's position while transiting Osumi Kaykyo (Van Dieman Strait, Japan); (7) on 15 February 1980, by plotting said vessel's position at 1912 about 15 miles from its true position, while said vessel was in Pearl Harbor Channel, and (8) on 15 February 1980 by plotting an incorrect 2400 dead reckoning position for the vessel; and was incompetent by his acts and omissions, while standing deck watches on a foreign voyage, which demonstrated that he did not possess and exercise the professional skills of an ordinary, prudent, licensed third mate from 11 January to 15 February 1980.Appeal No. 2267Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/12/198111/12/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2323 - PHILPOTTThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 January 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's document for six months, plus six months on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Wiper on board the SS KEYSTONER under authority of the captioned document, on or about 8 December 1982, Appellant, at the Port of Houston, Texas had approximately ten grams of marijuana in his possession. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas and Long Beach, California on 17 December 1982 and 13 January 1983. At the hearing in Houston, Appellant was not present, but a motion for change of venue to Long Beach, California was made on his behalf and granted. At the hearing in Long Beach, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2323Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/13/19839/13/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2382 - NILSENThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 1 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Master of the S/S SAN JUAN, under the authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did on 11 February 1980, while said vessel was departing San Juan, Puerto Rico, fail to navigate the vessel within the confines of the Bar Channel causing said vessel to ground. Two other specifications were dismissed, one on motion of the Investigating Officer, the other on motion of Appellant. The hearing was held at San Juan, Puerto Rico, on 3 February, 4 February, and 31 March 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification.Appeal No. 2382Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19852/22/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2039 - DIETZEThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 15 January 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's license for three months outright upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as pilot on board M/V ANCO PRINCESS being the holder of the license above captioned, on or about 24 September 1974, Appellant, while navigating said vessel upbound on the Misissippi River and meeting a downbound vessel and tow at approximately mile 4 AHP, (1) wrongfully failed to execute a port-to-port passing in accordance with Article 18, Inland Rules of the Road, thereby contributing to the collision between said vessel and the tow of the M/V LIBBY BLACK, and (2) wrongfully failed to sound whistle signals in accordance with Article 18, Inland Rules of the Road. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2039Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/8/197510/8/197512/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2275 - ALOUISEThis appeal had been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 May 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Mo. suspended Appellant's license for 2 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the M/V R. E. DOYLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 May 1980, Appellant operated his vessel in a negligent manner creating an excessive wake which caused 15 barges to break loose from their moorings at Cleancoal Terminal Facility, Mile 535.2 L/B Ohio River. A hearing was held at Cincinnati, Ohio on 1 April and rehearing was held on 7 May 1981 to hear the testimony of a defense witness. At the hearings, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2275Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19826/4/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2151 - GREENThis appeal had been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 April 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for a period of four months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as able bodied seaman on board the United States SS THOMAS JEFFERSON under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant failed to perform his duties on the 0000-0400 seawatch on 1 March 1978, and again on 16 March 1978, while the vessel was at sea. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts, on 14 April 1978. Appellant was present at the hearing, but was not represented by counsel. The Administrative Law Judge advised him of his right to be so represented, but Appellant elected to proceed without counsel. Upon arraignment, Appellant pleaded guilty to the charge and specifications. Warned by the Administrative Law Judge of the possible consequences of his action, Appellant nevertheless persisted in his plea of guilty. Despite the plea, the Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of THOMAS JEFFERSON, as well as the testimony of Captain Orie F. Graves, Master of the vessel. After being reminded of his right to remain silent, Appellant chose to make a sworn statement in explanation of his guilty plea. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and two specifications had been proved by plea. He then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of four months. The entire written decision was served on 8 May 1978. Appeal was timely filed on 8 May 1978 and perfected on 12 May 1978.Appeal No. 2151Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/3/19794/3/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2533 - ORTIZThis appeal from the denial of the Administrative Law Judge to reopen the hearing has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 C.F.R. 5.601. By a decision dated 12 February 1991, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document, having found proved the charge of cocaine use. The single specification supporting the finding of proved to the charge of drug use alleged that, on or about 6 July 1990, Appellant, while the holder of the above-captioned document, was tested by urinalysis and found to be a user of the drug cocaine. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 25 January 1991. The Administrative Law Judge received into evidence from the Investigating Officer three exhibits and heard the sworn se and was advised of his rights, including the right to counsel or other representation and of the procedures to be followed at the hearing. Appellant entered a response of "deny" to the charge and specification as provided in 46 C.F.R. 5.527.Appeal No. 2533Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/3/199112/3/199111/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2165 - BOLDSThese appeals have been taken in accordance with Title 46 United states Code 239(g) and Title 48 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By orders dated 26 October 1977 (BOLDS) and 27 October 1977 (BROOKS), an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked the seamen's documents of both Appellants upon finding each guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that BOLDS, while serving as crew messman, and BROOKS, while serving as bedroom utility, on board SS HESS VOYAGER under the authority of the respective document above captioned, did: "on or about 29 July 1977 wrongfully have in your possession certain narcotics to wit; marijuana." The cases of the Appellants were joined for a single hearing upon motion of the Investigating Officer. The hearing was held at San Juan, Puerto Rico, on 12 and 13 October 1977. The hearings were held in absentia, upon the failure of the Appellants to appear at the time and place specified, after their requests to the Administrative Law Judge for a change of venue were denied on the grounds of insufficient reasons stated in the requests. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty for each Appellant as to the charge and specification against each. Appellants were not represented by counsel in the course of the proceedings leading to the initial decisions in these cases.Appeal No. 2165Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/11/19799/11/197912/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2096 - TAYLORThese appeals have been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By orders dated 8 May 1975, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant Taylor's license for three months and Appellant Wood's license for nine months upon findings each guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as master and pilot, respectively, on board SS KEYTRADER under authority of the respective license above captioned, on or about 18 January 1974, Appellants' wrongfully initiated a starboard to starboard passing with SS BAUNE, contributing to a collision with that vessel, and failed to navigate KEYTRADER with caution, after proposing a starboard to starboard passing by whistle and radio, receiving no agreement, and failing to slow down.Appeal No. 2096Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/28/19772/28/197712/21/2017
Page 14 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.