• TJAG Home Page
  • CGCCA Home Page
  • Oral Argument Schedule
  • Appellate Briefs
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Orders
  • CGCCA Rules of Appellate Procedure with JRAP (Mar 2025)
CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V DALY - 69 MJ 549This is a Government appeal under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). On 5 March 2010, the military judge dismissed the single charge under Article 134, UCMJ, and its four specifications. The Government requested reconsideration on17 March 2010, which the military judge summarily denied on 26 March 2010. The Government gave notice of appeal on 29 March 2010. On 17 May 2010, the Government filed with this Court the record of trial, which had been authenticated on 2 May 2010. The Government filed its brief on 7 June 2010.Docket No. 001-62-10Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals6/14/20106/14/201010/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V LAYTON PER CURIAM - 63 MJ 600This is an Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), appeal by the Government of the special court-martial military judge’s dismissal of a charge and specification for failure to state an offense. The charge and specification in question alleged that the accused wrongfully endeavored to impede a Coast Guard adverse administrative proceeding by seeking to substitute another person’s urine sample for his own during a mandatory random urinalysis test for controlled substances, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ.Docket No. 001-62-05Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals2/7/20062/7/200610/24/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V STIREWALT - 58 MJ 552This represents the second occasion for this Court to review this case pursuant to Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and the third time it has been before us. Because of the case’s unusual procedural history, a brief recitation of its background is provided. On 17 June 1997, Appellant was convicted of the following offenses by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members: four specifications of maltreatment by sexual harassment, one specification of rape, one specification of forcible sodomy, three specifications of assault consummated by a battery, four specifications of adultery, and four specifications of indecent assault, in violation of Articles 93, 120, 125, 128, and 134 of the UCMJ, respectively. Prior to sentencing, the original military judge dismissed two specifications of maltreatment, two specifications of assault consummated by a battery, and one specification of adultery as multiplicious. The members sentenced Appellant to reduction to paygrade E-1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for ten years, and a dishonorable discharge. On 29 October 1997, the convening authority approved the findings and sentence and ordered it executed with the exception of the dishonorable discharge. For a detailed recitation of the facts underlying the aforementioned charges, see United States v. Stirewalt, 53 M.J. 582 (C.G. Ct. Crim. App. 2000).Docket No. 1089Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals3/11/20033/11/200310/5/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsTHOMS V TOUSLEY EXT WRIT ORDERTHOMS V TOUSLEY EXT WRIT ORDER Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionMISC. DOCKET N0. 003-12Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals1/27/20121/27/20129/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V CAIN - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V CAIN - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1385Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals8/7/20148/7/20149/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MORALES - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V MORALES - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals - OpinionDocket No. 1349Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 12/30/201112/30/20119/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V RESENDEZ - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V RESENDEZ - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1378Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals8/13/20148/13/20149/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V RIESBECK - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V RIESBECK - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1374Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals8/5/20145/8/20149/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V SUBA - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V SUBA - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1380Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals7/29/20147/29/20149/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V SULLIVAN - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V SULLIVAN - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 001-69-13Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals9/25/20149/25/20149/18/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BEALE - 54 MJ 651UNITED STATES V BEALE - 54 MJ 651 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1136Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals12/11/200012/11/20008/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V ANDERSON - 55 MJ 588UNITED STATES V ANDERSON - 55 MJ 588 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1138Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals4/27/20014/27/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BERNARD - 69 MJ 694UNITED STATES V BERNARD - 69 MJ 694 Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals - Opinion Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of two specifications of wrongful sexual contact, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of assault, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ; and one specification each of indecent assault and indecent language, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. The court sentenced Appellant to restriction for two months, reduction to E-3, and a bad-conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence except for the restriction.Docket No. 1328Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals12/21/201012/21/20109/21/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BOND - 69 MJ 701UNITED STATES V BOND - 69 MJ 701 Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals - Opinion Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of one specification of assault and battery, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); and one specification each of drunk and disorderly conduct and indecent language, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. The court sentenced Appellant to reduction to E-1 and a bad-conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged.Docket No. 1314Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals11/23/201011/23/20109/21/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUnited States V HUGHEY 72 M.J. 809United States V HUGHEY 72 M.J. 809 Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1363Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals8/27/20138/27/20139/18/2017
Page 18 of 34

Oral Arguments

Pursuant to U.S. Department of Defense Standard carrying out Article 140a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [10 U.S.C. s. 940a] (revised, January 2025), an audio recording of an oral argument will typically be made publicly accessible. Audio recordings for oral arguments after the effective date of this new rule (January 2025) are below. As part of this requirement, a military service provides a mechanism by which a written transcript may be made available upon request. Contact HQS-DG-LST-CG-LMJ@uscg.mil with the reason for the request. 

 

Parties Docket Audio File Date
U.S. v. Ray 1498 MP3 2025/05/13
U.S. v. Kelley 1495 MP3 2025/03/26