| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1933 - HERRING | By order dated 26 February 1971, an Administrative Law Judge
of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California,
suspended Appellant's seaman's licenses for three months outright
upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found
proved allege that while serving as pilot on board the Japanese M/V
SUWA MARU #37 under authority of the license above captioned, on or
about 17 July 1969, Appellant:
(1) negligently failed to navigate "said vessel" in a
cautious and prudent manner "notwithstanding the presence
of the M/V KOLO which was also being navigated outbound
ahead of said vessel," and
(2) negligently failed to maintain a proper lookout aboard
SUWA MARU #37.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of two witnesses who were aboard KOLO.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. | Appeal No. 1933 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 6/15/1973 | 6/15/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1932 - KEATING | By order dated 26 October 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while
serving as a Fireman/Watertender on board the United States SS
OVERSEAS EXPLORER under authority of the document above described,
on or about 15 July 1970, Appellant did:
(1) wrongfully fail to perform his assigned duties from 1600
to 2400 hours;
(2) wrongfully absent himself from the vessel without
permission;
(3) wrongfully assault the Chief Officer, Norman
Namenson; and
(4) wrongfully assault and batter with a deadly weapon, to
wit; a piece of steel rod, Radio Officer Billy G.
Crawford, and did injure said officer.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records from the OVERSEAS EXPLORER, a steel rod, and the testimony
of several witnesses.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of a
witness.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and each specification had been proved. The Administrative Law
Judge then entered an order revoking all documents. | Appeal No. 1932 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/23/1973 | 5/23/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1931 - POLLARD | By order dated 10 November 1971, an Administrative Law Judge
of the United States Coast Guard at Portsmouth, Virginia, revoked
Appellant's seaman documents outright upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as a Second Cook on board the United States N. S. MAUMEE
under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20
August 1971, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter another
crewmember with a dangerous weapon; to wit, a knife, resulting in
injury to that crewmember.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence documentary
evidence and the testimony of witnesses. | Appeal No. 1931 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/23/1973 | 5/23/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1930 - CRUZ | By order dated 9 July 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of the
United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months outright upon
finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved
allege that while serving as Second Cook and Baker on board the SS
SANTA CLARA under authority of the document above captioned, on or
about 17 October 1970, while the vessel was in the port of
Buenaventura, Columbia, Appellant
(1) did wrongfully strike the Chief Steward in the face; and
(2) did wrongfully attack the Chief Steward with a knife,
causing him bodily harm and injury.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of six members of the vessel's crew and various documentary
evidence.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony,
that of the former Second Cook and Baker of the vessel, and various
documentary evidence. | Appeal No. 1930 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/22/1977 | 5/22/1977 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1929 - JAVIER | By order dated 18 June 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California,
suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months upon
finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved
allege that while serving as an oiler on board SS FRONTENAC VICTORY
under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 6
August 1968, Appellant, at San Francisco, California:
(1) wrongfully used abusive language to an officer of the
United States Coast Guard, LTJG David B. Weiner, in the
performance of his duties; and
(2) wrongfully assaulted a member of the Coast Guard, Chief
Petty Officer R. J. Collins, in the performance of his
duties.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of FRONTENAC VICTORY and the testimony of three witnesses.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.
After the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specifications had been proved. The Judge then entered an
order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of
three months. | Appeal No. 1929 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/22/1973 | 5/22/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1928 - VIRDEN | By order dated 23 July 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for three months outright upon
finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved
allege that while serving as Chief Engineer on board the SS OBERLIN
VICTORY under authority of the license above described, Appellant:
(1) failed to take appropriate action, during the period
between 6 June and 20 June 1969, to correct excessive
boiler feed water salinity which resulted in tube rupture
in the starboard boiler on or about 20 June 1969; and
(2) failed to take appropriate action, during the period
between 6 June and 27 June 1969, to correct excessive
boiler feed water salinity which resulted in excessive
damage to the vessel's port boiler and other machinery on
or about 27 June 1969. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the vessel's
engineroom log and "Drew Log," a victory ship boiler operation and
maintenance manual, a Drew boiler water treatment chart, lab test
results on the boiler scale, the deposition of the vessel's Second
Assistant Engineer and oral testimony by the First and Third
Assistant Engineers, a Coast Guard Marine Inspector and an American
Bureau of Shipping surveyor. | Appeal No. 1928 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/22/1973 | 5/22/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1927 - SAVAGE | By order dated 15 October 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on nine months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a Galley
Utilityman on board the United States SS HOPE under authority of
the document above captioned, on 7 March 1971, Appellant did, while
said vessel was in Kingston, Jamaica, wrongfully fail to turn to on
time, and did on 9 April 1971, while said vessel was in Kingston,
Jamaica, fail to take his regularly assigned fire and lifeboat
stations.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and
entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence abstracts of
the shipping articles and pertinent Records of Official Logbook Entries, all certified under Consular Seal.
In defense, Appellant offered no evidence.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and
specifications had been proved. The Administrative Law Judge
entered an order suspending all documents, issued to Appellant, for
a period of two months on nine months' probation. | Appeal No. 1927 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/15/1973 | 5/15/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1926 - BENSON | By order dated 5 April 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at Detroit Michigan, suspended
Appellant's license for ten days outright plus twenty days on nine
months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as pilot
under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant
(1) On board the Liberian M/V TROPICAL
PLYWOOD, on or about 11 June 1970, did direct
the navigation of said vessel at a speed in
excess of 10 m.p.h. over the bottom in the St.
Clair River in violation of the speed limit
prescribed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
under the authority of 33 CFR 207.510 (d) (4)
and made effective through publication in
Notice to Mariners NCELO-O dated 13 August
1969 by the District Engineer, Detroit
District; and (2) On board the Norwegian M/V NORSE
TRANSPORTER, on or about 19 June 1970, did
direct the navigation of said vessel at a
speed in excess of 10 m.p.h. over the bottom
in the St. Clair River in violation of the
speed limit prescribed by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers under the authority of 33 CFR
207.510 (d) (4) and made effective through
publication in Notice to Mariners NCELO-O
dated 13 August 1969 by the District Engineer,
Detroit District.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification. | Appeal No. 1926 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/15/1973 | 5/15/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1925 - ABBOTT | By order dated January 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast guard at New York, New York, suspended
Appellant's license for three months outright upon finding him
guilty of two charges of negligence. the first charge of
negligence found proved is supported by two specifications, the
first of which alleges that the Appellant, while serving as Master
aboard the SS PONCE DE LEON on 8 March 1969, while enroute Pier 13,
Staten Island, New York, from sea in the Verrazano Narrows Bridge
wrongfully did fail to navigate with due caution as the burdened
vessel by failing to keep out of the way of the SS HONG KONG
MERCHANT in a crossing situation in violation of Rules 19 and 22 of
the Inland Rules of the Road. The second specification under the
first charge alleges that Appellant on that same date, in that same
location, failed to navigate on the starboard side of the channel
until the channel was clear for a safe crossing, and therefore
contributed to a collision between his vessel and the SS HONG KONG
MERCHANT. The second charge of negligence is supported by a single
specification which alleges that the Appellant on 24 March 1969
while Master of the SS PONCE DE LEON when that vessel was departing
San Juan Harbor failed to determine the ship's position before
making a left turn into the Graving Dock Channel thereby grounding
his vessel in the vicinity of Puerto Neuvo Channel Light 3
(LL-1305). | Appeal No. 1925 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/17/1973 | 5/17/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1924 - MACDONALD | By order dated 26 October 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for nine months upon finding him
guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that
while serving as a fireman/watertender on board the SS TRANSPACIFIC
under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 23,
24, 25, 26 and 27 May 1970, Appellant failed to perform duties by
reason of intoxication at Manila, P.R.
At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Administrative
Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of TRANSPACIFIC and a deposition of a witness.
There was no defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specifications had been proved. The Administrative Law Judge
then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant
for a period of nine months. | Appeal No. 1924 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/3/1973 | 5/3/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1923 - ADAMS | By order dated 14 January 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for six months outright plus six
months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as an oiler on board the United States SS SILVER DOVE under
authority of the document above described, on or about 30 November
1970 and 1, 2 and 4 December 1970 Appellant wrongfully absented
himself from his vessel and duties without permission.
At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Administrative
Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain
voyage records of the SILVER DOVE. Because of Appellant's absence,
nothing was offered in defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and
specification had been proved. The Administrative Law Judge then
entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant, for
a period of six months outright plus six months on 12 months'
probation. | Appeal No. 1923 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/26/1973 | 4/26/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1922 - BEATON | By order dated 28 October 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California,
suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months plus six
months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while
serving as an able seaman on board the SS TRANSERIE under authority
of the document above captioned, Appellant:
(1) on 24 June 1969 wrongfully failed to join the vessel at
Manila, P.R.;
(2) on 3 and 4 July 1969 wrongfully failed to perform duties
at Keelung, Taiwan; and
(3) on 17 August 1969, failed to perform duties both at Da
Nang, RVN, and at sea. At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Administrative
Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of the SS TRANSERIE.
There was no defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specifications had been proved. He then entered an order
suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of six
months plus six months on six months' probation. | Appeal No. 1922 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/27/1973 | 4/27/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1921 - WIGREN | By order dated 15 October 1969, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for 12 months outright upon finding
him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges
that while serving as an Oiler on board the United States SS RAMBAM
under authority of the document above described, on or about 22,
23, 24, 25, 26, and 27 August 1969 while said vessel was at the
port of Inchon, Korea, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his
assigned duties.
At the hearing, Appellant failed to appear. A plea of not
guilty to the charge and specification was entered on behalf of
Appellant.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certified
copies from the ship's logbook and the Shipping Articles.
Since Appellant failed to appear there was no defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specification had been proved. The Administrative Law Judge
then entered an order suspending all documents, issued to
appellant, for a period of 12 months outright. | Appeal No. 1921 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/5/1973 | 4/5/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1920 - CESSFORD | By order dated 9 November 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for eight months outright upon
finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved
allege that while serving as a deck utility on board the SS JEAN
LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant:
(1) on or about 3 July 1969, did wrongfully have intoxicants
in his possession while the vessel was at Baton Rouge,
Louisiana; and
(2) on or about 5 July 1969, did wrongfully fail to perform
his assigned duties while the vessel was at New Orleans,
Louisiana;
and while serving as an Able Bodied Seaman on board the SS EAGLE
TRANSPORTER under authority of his duly issued document, Appellant: (3) on or about 5 September 1968, did wrongfully fail to join
said vessel at Sattahip, Thailand;
(4) on or about 17 September 1968, did wrongfully fail to
perform his assigned duties while the vessel was at
Bahrain; and
(5) on or about 9 October 1968, did wrongfully fail to join
said vessel at Sattahip, Thailand.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence excerpts from
the shipping articles and official logs of the SS JEAN LYKES and
the SS EAGLE TRANSPORTER.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence three letters from
defense counsel and two medical reports.
After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a
written decision in which he concluded that the charge and all five
specifications had been proved. He then served a written order on
Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of
eight months outright. | Appeal No. 1920 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/5/1973 | 4/5/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1919 - ARCHIE | By order dated 3 March 1972, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon findings him guilty of the
charge of "charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law
violation." The specification found proved alleges that while the
holder of U.S. Merchant Mariner's Document above described, on or
about 23 December 1969, Appellant was convicted by the Superior
Court, in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California,
a court of record, for violation of a Narcotic Drug Law, to wit:
Violation of Section 11530 of the Health and Safety Code of the
State of California; to wit: possession of marijuana.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certified
copies of court records from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence certified copies of
the arrest report and the preliminary hearing transcript from the
above court and his own testimony.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and
specification had been proved. The Administrative Law Judge then
served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued
to him. | Appeal No. 1919 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/5/1973 | 4/5/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1918 - STUART | By order dated 26 March 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the
charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The
specification found proved alleges that Appellant, holder of the
document above captioned, was on 19 March 1969 convicted by a court
of record at Balboa, Canal Zone, for violation of a narcotic drug
law of the zone, possession of marijuana.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by Professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence records of
the Magistrate's Court of Balboa, Canal Zone.
In defense, Appellant offered no evidence. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specification had been proved. He then entered an order
revoking all documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1918 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/30/1973 | 3/30/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1917 - RAY | By order dated 4 October 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for four months outright plus four
months on 18 months' probation upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while
serving as an able bodied seaman on board the United States NS
COSSATOT under authority of the document above described, on or
about 28 August 1970, Appellant wrongfully failed to join said
vessel at Naples, Italy.
At the hearing, Appellant failed to appear, therefore the
hearing proceeded in absentia. A plea of not guilty was entered to
the charge and specification on behalf of the Appellant.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the original
signed copy of the "Advice to Person Charged" provided Appellant,
an extract of the shipping articles, and a certified copy of page 36 of the official logbook.
Since Appellant did not appear, there was no defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specification had been proved. The Administrative Law Judge
the entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant,
for a period of four months outright plus four months on 18 months'
probation. | Appeal No. 1917 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/31/1973 | 3/31/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1916 - MCGOWAN | By order dated 28 January 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California,
suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months outright
plus three months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty
of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while
serving as able seaman on board the United States SS GREEN LAKE
under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 17
October 1969, Appellant was wrongfully absent without leave on
numerous occasions, failed to perform on one occasion, and failed
to join vessel; all while in Okinawa.
At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Administrative
Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of the SS GREEN LAKE. There was no defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and
fourteen specifications had been proved. He then served a written
order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a
period of three months outright plus three months on six months'
probation. | Appeal No. 1916 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/30/1973 | 3/30/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1915 - GAINES | By order dated 20 Sept 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for one month on twelve months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification
found proved alleges that while serving as Radio Officer on board
the United States SS DEL ORO under authority of the captioned
documents on or about 9 August 1971, Appellant wrongfully failed to
attend a boat drill.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records and the testimony of the Master and Chief Mate. The Administrative Law Judge introduced in evidence a Station Bill
Card.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and
specification had been proved. He then served a written order on
Appellant suspending all documents, issued to him for a period of
one month on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1915 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/26/1973 | 3/26/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1914 - ESPERANZA | By order dated 1 March 1972, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New York, N. Y., admonished
Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved alleges that while serving as a Second
Pumpman on board the United States SS MARYLAND TRADER under
authority of the document above described, on or about 2 February
1972, Appellant wrongfully refused to obey a lawful command of the
Second Assistant Engineer not to use a torch.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the affidavit
of service and voyage records from the SS MARYLAND TRADER.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and
specification had been proved. He then served a written order on
Appellant admonishing Appellant. | Appeal No. 1914 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/30/1973 | 3/30/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1913 - GOLDING | By order dated 12 May 1972, an Administrative Law Judge of the
United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, after a hearing
held at Miami, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for four
months outright plus four months on eighteen months' probation upon
finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved
alleges that while serving as master on board M/V JUNGLE QUEEN II
under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 21
March 1971, Appellant "wrongfully failed to insure that the vessel
was properly prepared to sail; to wit: That you got the vessel
underway with a mooring line made fast to the pier resulting in
failure of mooring devices causing personal injuries to three of
the passengers on board the vessel."
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification. personal injury and the testimony of four witnesses.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.
Without objection the Administrative Law Judge took a view of
the vessel.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specification had been proved. He then entered an order
suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of four
months outright plus four months on 18 months' probation. | Appeal No. 1913 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/30/1973 | 3/30/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1912 - RICHARD | By order dated 22 July 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California,
suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on six
months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specification found proved alleges that while serving as Third
Assistant Engineer on board the SS U.S. PILOT under authority of
the document and license above captioned, on or about 31 July 1969,
while the vessel was at Stockton, California, Appellant did
wrongfully create a disturbance in the vessel's saloon mess by
directing abusive language towards a fellow crewmember and
physically grabbing and manhandling said crewmember.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence testimony of
the victim, the master, and two other eyewitnesses.
In defense, Appellant offered no evidence.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and
the above specification had been proved. However, he reserved
decision on another specification. He subsequently found this
latter specification unproven and served a written order on
Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of
three months on six months' probation. | Appeal No. 1912 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/21/1973 | 3/21/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1911 - GEESE | By order dated 2 September 1971, an Administrative Law Judge
of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California,
admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specification found proved alleges that while serving as an able
seaman on board the SS AMERCREST under authority of the document
above captioned, on or about 9 June 1970, while the vessel was at
sea Appellant wrongfully addressed the Second Mate with foul and
abusive language.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence extracts from
the official logbook of the vessel and testimony by the Second Mate
and Able Seaman Ruth. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence written statements
and oral testimony by himself and Able Seaman Rogers.
On 2 September 1971, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a
written decision in which he concluded that the charge and the
above specification had been proved and he served a written order
on Appellant admonishing him. | Appeal No. 1911 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/16/1973 | 3/16/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1910 - HINDS | By order dated 9 September 1971, an Administrative Law Judge
of the United States Coast Guard at San Diego, California,
suspended Appellant's license for six months on 12 months'
probation upon finding him guilty of violation of a statute. The
specifications found proved alleges that while serving as a master
on board the United States fishing vessel CRUSADER under authority
of the license above captioned, on or about 2 July 1971 to 25
August 1971, Appellant did wrongfully employ or engage to perform
the duties of mate aboard the CRUSADER, a fishing vessel of 217
gross tons, a person or persons not licensed to perform such duties
in violation of 46 U.S.C. 224a (R.S. 4438a) for a fishing voyage on
the high seas which began at San Diego, California, and terminated
upon sinking of the vessel.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by nonprofessional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence documentary
evidence and testimony of witnesses.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony
and that of other witnesses.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and
specification had been proved. He then entered an order suspending
all licenses, issued to Appellant for a period of six months on 12
months' probation. | Appeal No. 1910 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/16/1973 | 3/16/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1909 - MINSTER | By order dated 21 March 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended
appellant's seaman's documents for six months on 12 months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. the specification
found proved alleges that while serving as a wiper on board the
United States SS GREEN LAKE under authority of the document above
described, on or about 21 January 1971, appellant did wrongfully
embezzle certain stores of the said vessel while said vessel was in
the port of Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certain
documents and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specification had been proved. The Administrative Law Judge
then entered an order suspending all documents, issued to
Appellant, for a period of six months on 12 months' probation. | Appeal No. 1909 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2/27/1973 | 2/27/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1908 - NEILSON | By order dated 15 September 1971, an Administrative Law Judge
of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. the specification found proved alleges that while
serving as a Second Steward on board the SS SANTA MERCEDES under
authority of the document above captioned, on or about 21 November
1970 while the vessel was at sea, Appellant did wrongfully molest
a minor male passenger, by applying an electric vibrator to his
person, while engaging him in conversation about sexual matters.
Appellant failed to appear at the first two sessions of the
hearing. At the third session, Appellant appeared and elected to
act as his own counsel. He entered a plea of not guilty to the
charge and specification. He also appeared at the fourth and fifth
sessions, but not the sixth and the final sessions.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence testimony of another passenger, and a certified extract from the shipping
articles of the vessel.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence a letter from the
National Maritime Union. No formal defense was presented.
Appellant failed to appear at four of the seven sessions of the
hearing.
After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a
written decision in which he concluded that the charge and
specification had been proved. He entered an order revoking all
documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1908 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2/7/1973 | 2/7/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1907 - O'CONNOR | United States Coast Guard at Portsmouth, Va., revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of
negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while
serving as a Third Assistant Engineer on board the United States
SS U.S. ADVENTURER under authority of the document and license
above captioned, on or about 26 January 1968, Appellant:
(1) left his assigned engineroom watch without relief and
retired to his bunk;
(2) while on watch became intoxicated to the extent that he
was unable to perform his assigned duty; and
(3) by absenting himself from his assigned duties
contributed to a casualty to the vessel's port boiler.
At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Administrative
Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records and the testimony of two engineering officers.
There was no defense. | Appeal No. 1907 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/30/1973 | 1/30/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1906 - HERNANDEZ | This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United
States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations
137.30-1.
By order dated 14 June 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while
serving under authority of the captioned documents on or about 12
November 1969, Appellant wrongfully did have in his possession
925.5 grams (approximately 2 lbs.) of hashish (cannabis sativa) on
12 November 1969 at Port Newark, New Jersey.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a certified
extract of shipping articles, a certified copy of a U.S. Customs
Laboratory Report, the testimony of two (2) customs special agents and the testimony of a chemist.
In defense, Appellant offered his own testimony.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specification had been proved. He then entered an order
revoking all documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1906 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/30/1973 | 1/30/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1905 - FOOTE | By order dated 10 June 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Oregon, revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the
charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The
specification found proved alleges that on or about 16 September
1970, Appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of the State of
Oregon of violation of a narcotic drug law of that State.
The Investigating Officer produced, and the Administrative Law
Judge entered into the record a certified record of the Oregon
court.
In defense, Appellant offered no evidence.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specification had been proved by plea. The Administrative Law
Judge then entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant.
The entire decision was served on 15 June 1971. Appeal was
timely filed. | Appeal No. 1905 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/30/1973 | 1/30/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1904 - JOHNSON | By order dated 23 July 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California,
suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months outright
upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found
proved allege that while serving as an Ordinary Seaman on board the
SS HANS ISBRANDTSEN under authority of the document above
captioned, on or about 10 February 1969, Appellant, while the
vessel was in the port of Singapore:
(1) was wrongfully unable to perform his assigned duties by
reason of intoxication;
(2) did wrongfully urinate in the passageway outside the 4-8
Ordinary Seaman's forecastle; and
(3) did wrongfully assault and batter with a dangerous
weapon, to wit, a knife, a member of the crew. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and
first specification and not guilty to the second and third
specifications.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a Consular
Report with attachments and depositions of the victim and six other
crewmembers.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his testimony, his
military record, photographs of his room, a letter from his
attorney to the Singapore Police, two letters written by Appellant
and the receipt for a fine paid to the Singapore Police. | Appeal No. 1904 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/30/1973 | 1/30/1973 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1903 - MCMARRAY | This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United
States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations
137.30-1.
By order dated 20 January 1971, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for six months outright plus six
months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while
serving as A.B., on board SS MORMACRIO under authority of the
document above captioned, Appellant:
(1) on 17 October 1969 did wrongfully assault and batter a
fellow crewmember, while the vessel was at sea;
(2) on 22 October 1969 did wrongfully fail to obey a lawful
order of the Chief Mate, to present the "Medical Report
of Duty Status" form at Baltimore, Maryland; and
(3) on 23 October 1969 did wrongfully desert the vessel at
Baltimore, Maryland, after being ordered to remain aboard by the Chief Mate.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence excerpts from
the vessel's shipping articles and official log and testimony by
the Master and four crewmembers.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony,
notes of the Investigating Officer, the "Medical Report of Duty
Status" form, and a clinical abstract from USPHS Hospital,
Baltimore, Maryland. | Appeal No. 1903 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/29/1972 | 12/29/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1902 - NEWBROUGH | By order dated 3 June 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of the
United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended
Appellant's seaman's documents for six months outright upon finding
him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege
that while serving as First Assistant Radio Officer on board the SS
PRESIDENT CLEVELAND under authority of the document and license
captioned, Appellant, while the vessel was at sea,
(1) due to intoxication, wrongfully failed to stand a watch
on 25 July 1969;
(2) on 25 July 1969 wrongfully telephoned the Master who had
retired for the evening;
(3) on 25 July 1969 wrongfully entered and remained in the
Economy class Passenger Lounge area;
(5) on 25 July 1969 wrongfully refused to obey a lawful order
of the Chief Officer to leave that area;
(6) on 25 July 1969 wrongfully entered and remained on the
Economy class Passenger Promenade Deck;
(7) on 25 July 1969 wrongfully failed to obey a lawful order
of the Chief Officer to leave that area and had to be
forcibly removed;
(8) on 25 July 1969 wrongfully possessed in his room
intoxicating beverages;
(9) on 25 July 1969 wrongfully refused to obey a lawful order
of the Master to leave the passageway outside the
Master's Office and had to be forcibly escorted to his
room;
(10) on 25 July 1969 wrongfully attempted to leave his room
contrary to the Master's direct order;
(11) on 25 July 1969 (Meridian Day) wrongfully disobeyed the
Master's direct order to remain in the ship's hospital;
(12) on 25 july 1969 (Meridian Day) wrongfully entered the
radioroom and grabbed the controls over the Chief Radio
Officer's objection; | Appeal No. 1902 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/29/1972 | 12/29/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1901 - MILLY | By order dated 11 May 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of the
United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of
misconduct.The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as a deck steward on board SS MARIPOSA under authority of
the document above captioned, on or about 22 May 1970; at Suva,
Fiji, wrongfully engaged in an unnatural sex act with a male of
minor age.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of MARIPOSA, a judgment of conviction in a Fiji court, and
the testimony of a witness. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.
Although the Administrative Law Judge's decision states that
Appellant testified in his own behalf, the record shows that
Appellant was permitted to testify on the limited issue of "due
process" in the Fiji court and that cross-examination on the merits
was not permitted.
At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specification had been proved. He then entered an order
revoking all documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1901 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/26/1972 | 12/26/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1900 - ORKWISZEWSKI | By order dated 11 June 1970, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
suspended Appellant,' seaman's documents for two months out-right
plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him
guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that
while serving as a wiper on board SS COMMANDER under authority of
the document above captioned, on or about 17 May 1968, Appellant,
while the vessel was at the Foreign Port of Amsterdam,
1) wrongfully created a disturbance in the crew's messroom;
2) wrongfully assaulted and battered the Chief Engineer; and
3) wrongfully used threatening words to a fellow crewmember,
Able Seaman Edwin Davis. On the first day of the hearing, Appellant appeared, but his
attorney did not. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of
not guilty to the charge and each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence testimony by
the Chief Engineer and Able Seaman Edwin Davis with the stipulation
that Appellant's attorney would be furnished a transcript of this
testimony and an opportunity to cross-examine at a later date.
In defense, Appellant offered no evidence. The Administrative
Law Judge adjourned the hearing instructing him to maintain contact
with his attorney and the Investigating Officer. He did not do so
and approximately one year later, a registered letter to his last
known address having returned marked "addressee unknown", the
hearing continued in absentia at the Investigating Officer's
urging. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the
returned registered letter, a letter from Appellant's attorney
stating that he no longer represented Appellant, and a certified
extract from the official log book of COMMANDER. | Appeal No. 1900 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/14/1972 | 12/14/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1899 - GARCIA | By order dated 2 March 1972, an Administrative Law Judge of
the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., revoked
Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as a wiper on board SS EXPORT AIDE under authority of the
document above captioned, on 15 October 1971, Appellant wrongfully
had in his possession a narcotic, to wit: hashish.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a record of
conviction in the Criminal Court, Kings County, City of New York
for possession of drugs.
In defense, Appellant made an unsworn statement. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge
rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge
and specification had been proved by plea. He then entered an
order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. | Appeal No. 1899 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/5/1972 | 12/5/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1885 - WHITE | By order dated 8 April 1969, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for
three months on twelve month's probation upon finding him guilty of
negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as pilot on board SS MEADOWBROOK under authority of the
license above captioned, on or about 4 May 1968, Appellant
wrongfully failed to navigate said vessel with due caution while in
restricted waters, to wit: Houston Ship Channel.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence
the testimony of three witnesses.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of a
witness and several documents.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending
Appellant's license for a period of three months on twelve month's
probation.
The entire decision was served on 17 April 1969. Appeal was
timely filed on 9 May 1969, and was perfected on 19 October 1970. | Appeal No. 1885 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 8/7/1972 | 8/7/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1868 - FRANK | By order dated 26 February 1971, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for three months plus three months on twelve
months' probation upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a third
officer on board SS SANTA MAGDALENA under authority of the document
and license above captioned, on 3 November 1970, Appellant, when
the vessel was at Guayaquil, Ecuador,
(1) committed an assualt and battery on the Chief Officer,
one John T. Russell, by offering to strike him with his
fist, by grabbing his shirt lapel, and by kicking him
about the body, and
(2) wrongfully threatened the Chief Officer.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of three witnesses and voyage records of SANTA MAGDALENA.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony,
voyage records of SANTA MAGDALENA, and medical records from the
U.S. Public Health Service.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months plus
three months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1868 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 2/3/1972 | 2/3/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1867 - ROLFES | By order dated 4 June 1970, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for four months plus four months on twelve months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification
found proved alleges that while serving as a deck engine mechanic
on board SS DOLLY TURMAN under authority of the document above
captioned, on or about 8 April 1970, Appellant failed to join the
vessel at Saigon, RVN.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of DOLLY TURMAN.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of four months plus four
months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1867 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/17/1972 | 1/17/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1866 - DUBOIS | By order dated 14 April 1970 and amended on 17 April 1970, an
Examiner of the United states Coast Guard at New York, N.y.,
suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on nine
months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as second
mate on board SS AMES VICTORY under authority of the document and
license above captioned, on or about 17 October 1969, Appellant, at
Subic Bay, P.R.,
(1) failed to perform his duties from 0400 to 0800;
(2) failed to perform his duties from 1600 to 2000; and
(3) failed to join the vessel at 2000.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented twice by
professional counsel, both of whom withdrew from the case.
Appellant then proceeded as his own counsel. Appellant entered a
plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of AMES VICTORY and the testimony of the master of the
vessel.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered an oral
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
has been proved. The Examiner then entered and order suspending
all documents for a period of two months on nine months' probation.
(Linking of this order to an earlier order will be discussed below
in the OPINION.) | Appeal No. 1866 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/13/1972 | 1/13/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1865 - RAZZI | By order dated 26 May 1970, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at New York, N.Y., suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for four months outright plus two months on twelve
months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a third
assistant engineer on board SS BIENVILLE under authority of the
document and license above described, on or about 9 April 1970,
Appellant wrongfully absented himself from the engine room and his
duties from about 2000 to 2400 when the vessel was at Genoa, Italy,
and that he wrongfully failed to join the vessel on 10 April 1970
at Genoa, Italy.
At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Examiner
entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduce in evidence voyage records
of BIENVILLE. There was no defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of four months outright
plus two months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1865 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/13/1972 | 1/13/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1864 - MOORE | By order dated 6 May 1970, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's
seaman's document for three months on 12 month's probation upon
finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved
allege that while serving as an AB seaman on board SS AMERICAN
SCOUT under authority of the document above captioned Appellant:
(1) on 2 and 3 April 1970, when the vessel was at Cat Lai,
RVN, wrongfully failed to perform assigned duties;
(2) on 3 April 1970, wrongfully failed to join the vessel at
Cat Lai, RVN;
(3) on 6 April 1970, at Vung Tau, RVN, failed to perform
duties because of intoxication; and (4) on 13 April 1970, at sea, failed to perform duties
because of intoxication.
At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Examiner
entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of AMERICAN SCOUT.
There was no defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months on 12
months' probation. | Appeal No. 1864 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1/10/1972 | 1/10/1972 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1863 - WOLTERS | By order dated 12 February 1971, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Detroit, Michigan, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for thirty days upon finding him guilty of
negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while
serving as master on board SS SYLVANIA under authority of the
license above captioned, on or about 21 November 1970, Appellant
failed to render assistance to two persons in danger of being lost
in the waters of Amherstburg Channel, Detroit River.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of several witnesses.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of certain witnesses and his own testimony.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of thirty days. | Appeal No. 1863 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 12/6/1971 | 12/6/1971 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1862 - GOLDEN | By order dated 13 November 1970, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended
Appellant's license for one month outright plus five months on
twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct.
The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a
junior chief mate on board SS ACHILLES under authority of the
license above captioned, Appellant:
(1) On or about 4 April 1970, at Drift River, Alaska,...
disobeyed a lawful order of the master by not providing
a hog and sag report;
(2) on or about 6 April 1970, at sea continued to disobey the
lawful order of the master by refusing to turn to and
perform his assigned duties; and
(3) on or about 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 April 1970 failed to perform his assigned duties.
At the hearing Appellant was respresented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of ACHILLES and the testimony of one witness.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence voyage records of
ACHILLES and the testimony of two witnesses.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
licenses issued to Appellant for a period of one month plus five
months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1862 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 11/3/1971 | 11/3/1971 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1861 - WASKASKI | By order dated 28 January 1969, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for four months outright plus four months' on
twelve months'probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved allege that while serving as a
fireman/watertender on board SS RUTGERS VICTORY under authority of
the document above captioned, Appellant:
(1) on 13 July 1968, at Subic Bay, P.R., failed to obey an
order of the chief engineer to go below and stand his
watch;
(2) on 19 July 1968, at "Jung Taw, R.V.N." [sic] failed to
stand his assigned watch from 1600 to 2400; and
(3) on 15 July 1968, at sea, failed to stand his assigned
watch from 0400 to 0800. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of RUTGERS VICTORY and the deposition of a witness.
Appellant offered no evidence in defense since he did not appear
after the first session of the hearing although given adequate
notice.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of four months outright
plus four months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1861 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 10/12/1971 | 10/12/1971 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1860 - MCGARRY | By order dated 28 February 1969, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for eight months upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while
serving as an oiler on board SS METAPAN under authority of the
document above captioned, Appellant:
(1) on 13 and 14 December 1968, failed to perform duties at
Yokohoma, Japan, and at sea;
(2) on 14 December 1968, at sea, did "wrongfully turn in
approximately 30 mins. past midnight on your 12-4 A.M.
watch at sea"; and
(3) on 14 December 1968, at sea, wrongfully had in his
possession a 40 oz. bottle containing 8 oz. of whiskey.
Appellant did not appear at the hearing. The Examiner entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of METAPAN and the testimony of one witness.
There was no defense.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. the Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of eight months. | Appeal No. 1860 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 10/8/1971 | 10/8/1971 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1839 - BRENNAN | By order dated 29 March 1970, an Examiner of the United States
Coast Guard at Corpus Chisti, Texas suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for two months on twelve months' probation upon finding
him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege
that while serving as person in charge of the tank barge ALAMO 1200
under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 19 May
1969, Appellant:
(1) wrongfully failed to insure that a person holding a valid
license as master, mate, pilot, or engineer or a
certificate tankerman was on duty to perform transfer
operations, thereby contributing to a marine casualty,
and
(2) wrongfully allowed tank hatches to remain open without
flame screens when not under the supervision of the senior crew members of the crew on duty when ALAMO 1200
was not in a gas free condition, thereby contributing to
a marine casualty.
At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional
counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduce the testimony of five
witnesses.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony
and a letter dated 13 November 1967 signed by the Commander, Eight
Coast Guard District. | Appeal No. 1839 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 5/20/1971 | 5/20/1971 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1838 - FORSYTH | By order dated 12 September 1969, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., revoked Appellant's
seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of addiction to the use
of narcotics and incompetence. The specifications found proved
allege that Appellant:
(1) being the holder of the document above captioned was on
30 January 1969 addicted to the use of a narcotic drug
(Charge One), and
(2) while serving as engine maintenance aboard SS CRISTOBAL
on 2 September 1969, under authority of the above
captioned document, incompetent to perform his assigned
duties.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and each specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony
of a doctor of the United States Public Health Service.
In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charges and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order revoking all
documents issued to Appellant.
The entire decision was served on 17 September 1969. | Appeal No. 1838 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/23/1971 | 4/23/1971 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1837 - ARNOLD | By order dated 10 March 1970, an Examiner of the United States
Coast guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's seaman's
documents for three months plus six months on twelve months'
probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification
found proved alleges that while serving as an able seaman on board
SS MARYLAND TRADER under authority of the document above captioned,
Appellant on 3 March 1970, failed to join MARYLAND TRADER at Ponce,
Puerto Rico.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
The Examiner entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and
specification.
The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage
records of MARYLAND TRADER.
In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all
documents issued to Appellant for a period of three months plus six
months on twelve months' probation. | Appeal No. 1837 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 4/16/1971 | 4/16/1971 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1836 - CLOUTIER | By order dated 31 October 1969, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, suspended Appellant's
seaman's documents for twelve months upon finding him guilty of
misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while
serving as a fireman/watertender on board SS GREEN BAY under
authority of the document above captioned, Appellant:
(1) on 20 September 1969, at Saigon, RVN, failed to perform
his duties from 0000 to 0800;
(2) on 21 September 1969, at Saigon, RVN, failed to perform
his duties from 0000-0800;
(3) on 22 September 1969, at Saigon, RVN, failed to perform
his duties from 0000 to 0800;
(4) on 23 September 1969, at Saigon, RVN, failed to perform
his duties from 0000 to 0400;
(5) on 23 September 1969, at Saigon, RVN, failed to perform
his duties from 1200-1600;
(6) on 23 September 1969, failed to join the vessel at
Saigon, RVN; and
(7) on 24, 25, and 26 September 1969, failed to perform
duties while the vessel was at sea.
At the hearing, Appellant did not appear. The Examiner
entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. | Appeal No. 1836 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/29/1971 | 3/29/1971 | | 12/27/2017 |
| Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 1835 - MURRAY | By order dated 17 October 1968, an Examiner of the United
States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Md., revoked Appellant's seaman's
documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The
specifications found proved, some thirty in number, need not be set
forth here in view of the action to be taken in this case.
At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel.
The pleas and the evidence need not be discussed.
At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written
decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications
had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order revoking all
documents issued to Appellant.
The entire decision was served on 18 October 1968. Appeal was
timely filed on 15 November 1968. | Appeal No. 1835 | Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority | 3/26/1971 | 3/26/1971 | | 12/27/2017 |