CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2283 - FUEHRThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the United States M/V W.W. HOLLOWAY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 September 1979, Appellant wrongfully departed the port of Milwaukee, WI, for Chicago, IL, and traversed Lake Michigan without the required endorsement on his license to wit: first class pilot upon the waters of Lake Michigan. The hearing was held at Chicago, IL on 18 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and three documents.Appeal No. 2283Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/24/19828/24/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2282 - LITTLEFIELDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Maine, suspended Appellant's license for 1 month on 12 months probation. The specification of the negligence charge found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator of M/V CAPTAIN LARRY, under authority of the captioned license, did at about 1315 on 6 August 1979, fail to adequately take into account the fall of the tide, causing said vessel to ground in the vicinity of Brewer's Boatyard Docks, Great Chebeague Island, Maine. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of four witnesses, and thirteen documents. In defense Appellant introduced his own testimony and three documents.Appeal No. 2282Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/24/19828/24/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2281 - BROMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States M/V W.W. HOLLOWAY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 September 1979, Appellant departed the port of Milwaukee, WI, for Chicago, IL, and traversed Lake Michigan without the required licensed personnel aboard as required by the vessel's certificate of inspection, to wit: the vessel sailed without the second mate having the proper endorsement to be a first class pilot upon Lake Michigan. The hearing was held at Chicago, IL on 18 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and three documents. The Appellant did not testify, call witnesses or introduce any documents.Appeal No. 2281Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/16/19828/16/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2280 - ARNOLDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 September 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct and physical incompetence. The specifications found proved alleged that Appellant while serving as crew messman aboard the SS AUSTRAL LIGHTING, under authority of the captioned document, (1) did on or about 6 June 1981 fail to perform his assigned duties, by not serving breakfast; (2) did on or about 10 June 1981 while the vessel was in Sydney, Australia, fail to perform his duties, by not serving supper; (3) did on or about 10 June 1981 while the vessel was in Sydney, Australia fail to join for the continued voyage to Melbourne, Australia; (4) did on or about 20 June 1981, fail to perform his duties for reasons of intoxication; (5) did on or about 21 June 1981, fail to perform his duties for reasons of intoxication; (6) did on or about 22 June 1981 while vessel was in Brisbane, Australia, fail to join for the continued voyage to San Francisco, California; (7) was on or about 21 June 1981 while the vessel was in port at Brisbane, Australia, and at the time of the hearing was, physically incompetent to perform the duties of an American merchant seaman due to diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, and alcohol abuse.Appeal No. 2280Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/22/19827/22/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2279 - LEWISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated February 11, 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The amended specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Wiper on board the SS DELTA SUD under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 February 1981, Appellant wrongfully possessed a narcotic drug aboard the vessel, to wit: marijuana and did wrongfully engage in disorderly conduct by using foul and abusive language to both the officers of the DELTA SUD and Coast Guard marine inspectors. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 11 February 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five exhibits. In defense Appellant testified on his own behalf. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and both specifications had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2279Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/16/19827/16/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2278 - BELTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 November 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for two months plus six months on eight months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board United States M/V CROCHET No. 2 under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 7 June 1981, Appellant negligently navigated said vessel causing a barge the vessel was towing to allide with the grounded S/V TALOFA LEE, damaging the pleasure craft. A hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 15 October 1981 and continued on 19 October 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and four exhibits.Appeal No. 2278Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/14/19827/14/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2277 - BANASHAKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's documents for two months on four months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as operator on board M/V GULF HAWK under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 24 February 1980, Appellant: 1)failed to navigate his vessel with due caution by directing the movement of the vessel and tow to port in a close quarters situation, thereby contributing to a collision between SS TEXAS SUN and GULF HAWK's tow; and, 2)failed properly to utilize the radar while visibility was restricted. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 19 March 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of one witness. Appellant offered no evidence in defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge reserved decision. He subsequently entered findings that the charge and two specifications had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of two months on four months' probation. The entire decision was served on 29 May 1980. Appeal was timely filed on 23 June 1980 and perfected on 7 November 1980.Appeal No. 2277Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/29/19826/29/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2276 - LUDLUMThis review has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for one month on twelve months' probation upon finding hin guilty of neglignece after a hearing held at Wilmington, North Carolina. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot of M/V TORRENT under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 23 August 1976, Appellant wrongfully failed to sound a danger signal upon meeting SS EASTERN SUN near buoy 50, on the Cape Fear River, thereby contributing to a collision between his vessel and SS EASTERN SUN. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses, the deposition of another witness, and several documents.Appeal No. 2276Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/1/19826/1/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2275 - ALOUISEThis appeal had been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 May 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Mo. suspended Appellant's license for 2 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the M/V R. E. DOYLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 May 1980, Appellant operated his vessel in a negligent manner creating an excessive wake which caused 15 barges to break loose from their moorings at Cleancoal Terminal Facility, Mile 535.2 L/B Ohio River. A hearing was held at Cincinnati, Ohio on 1 April and rehearing was held on 7 May 1981 to hear the testimony of a defense witness. At the hearings, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2275Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19826/4/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2274 - SMARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1 By order dated 28 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Tankerman on board the Crowley Barge 4 under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 16 June 1981, Appellant wrongfully smoked a cigarette on the weather deck of said vessel while not in a gas free condition at Long Beach Berth 233 while bunkering the M/V ORIENTAL EXECUTIVE. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 6 and 16 July 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence one document, and an agreed stipulation of facts. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of two witnesses, including his own, and documentary exhibits.Appeal No. 2274Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/5/19825/5/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2273 - SILVERMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 July, 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's United States Coast Guard Merchant Mariner's Document No. [REDACTED]-D3 for six months outright plus an additional period of six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of two specifications of misconduct, assault and battery and disobedience of a lawful order. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Fireman/Watertender onboard SS JOHN LYKES, under authority of the captioned document Appellant did, on or about 18 February 1980, assault and battery the Second Assistant Engineer, and on or about 11 February 1980 did fail to obey a lawful order of the Second Assistant Engineer by changing fuel oil strainers in the engine room without permission. A second specification of failure to obey an order was found not proved. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, in seven sessions between 5 May 1980 and 3 July 1980.Appeal No. 2273Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/8/19824/8/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2272 - PITTSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 March 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month, plus three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of one charge of negligence and one charge of misconduct. The respective supporting specifications found proved alleged: that while serving as Operator on board the M/V MORANIA #16 and Tow Barge MORANIA #400 under authority of the license above captioned on 19 February 1980, Appellant's flotilla collided with berth 2 of South Carolina State Ports Authority Columbia Street Terminal in Charleston, South Carolina; and that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, wrongfully exceeded the scope of his license by navigating from the high seas into inland waters to wit: Charleston Harbor, S.C., without having aboard a properly licensed pilot as required by 46 U.S.C. 364. A third charge, sounding in "Violation of Law," was found not proved. The hearing was held at Charleston, South Carolina on May 22, 1980.Appeal No. 2272Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/30/19823/30/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2271 - HAMILTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 February 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved in part alleged that while serving as Chief Cook on board SS TEXACO MARYLAND under authority of the document above captioned, on or about November 24, 1979, Appellant, while said vessel was proceeding to anchorage in New York Harbor, did wrongfully assault and batter with a potentially dangerous weapon, to wit: a stateroom metal trashcan, a member of the crew, Robert M. Jannah (also known as Robert I. Muhammed). The hearing was held at Corpus Christi, Texas, on 20 January 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2271Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/2/19823/2/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2270 - HEBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order date 12 February 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months, plus two months on four months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that (1) while serving as operator on board the United States M/V CAPT. JOHN under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 1900 hours 10 December, 1979, Appellant failed to navigate said vessel with caution by not providing an adequate lookout when his vessel's visibility was restricted by the barge it was pushing, contributing to a collision, (2) while serving as aforesaid, fail to navigate said vessel with caution by not keeping to that side of the midchannel which was on the starboard side of said vessel, contributing to a collision, and (3) while serving as aforesaid fail to sound the appropriate whistle signals, all while navigating on the Neches River, Texas, in the general vicinity of Port Neches Park and Jefferson Chemical Company Docks. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 7 October 1980, 29 October 1980, 13 November 1980 and 26 November 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to each charge and specification.Appeal No. 2270Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/19/19821/19/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2269 - WIJNGAARDEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 January 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of misconduct. The two specifications found proved alleged that "while serving as electrician on board the AUSTRAL ENVOY, on 10 December 1979, while the vessel was in the port of Melbourne, Australia, he wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties between the hours of 1045-1200, and 1300-1700." The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 4 December 1980. The Appellant was present at the hearing and was represented by professional counsel. He entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documents. Appellant introduced in evidence his own testimony. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge entered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and two specifications had been proved. He then entered an order of suspension for one month and an additional five months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 2269Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/16/198112/16/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2268 - HANKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 September 1980, an Administrative Law judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for two months, and further suspended his documents for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Operator onboard the tug DOMAR CAPTAIN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 21 June 1980, Appellant failed to insure that the barge DOMAR 118 was properly secured for sea, and on or about 21-27 June 1980, failed to adequately check the DOMAR 118 while he had it on a 1500 to 1800 foot tow. The specifications allege that both failures contributed to the sinking of the DOMAR 118 and subsequent oil pollution into the navigable waters of the United States on 27 June 1980. The hearing was held at Tampa, Florida, on 4 August 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2268Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/3/198112/3/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2267 - ERVASTThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 June 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, revoked Appellant's captioned license upon finding him guilty of negligence and incompetence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Third Mate on board SS PIONEER COMMANDER under authority of the license above captioned Appellant was negligent: (1) on 11 January 1980, during his 0800 1200 watch, by failure to fix the vessel's position, while transiting the San Bernadina Straits, R.P.; (2) on 11 January 1980, during his 2000 to 2400 watch, by failure to fix the vessel's position while transiting the Sibuyan Sea, R.P.; (3) on 24 January 1980, during his 2000 to 2400 watch, by failure to locate the navigation light control panel in order to secure the anchor lights and energize the navigation lights; (4) on 31 January 1980, during his 0800 to 1200 watch, by failure to fix the vessel's position while navigating from Pusan to Chin Hae, Korea; (5) on 31 January 1980, during his 0800 tp 1200 watch, by failure to take anchor bearings to fix the vessel's position after anchoring at Chin Hae, Korea; (6) on 3 February 1980, during his 2000 to 2400 watch, by failure to accurately fix said vessel's position while transiting Osumi Kaykyo (Van Dieman Strait, Japan); (7) on 15 February 1980, by plotting said vessel's position at 1912 about 15 miles from its true position, while said vessel was in Pearl Harbor Channel, and (8) on 15 February 1980 by plotting an incorrect 2400 dead reckoning position for the vessel; and was incompetent by his acts and omissions, while standing deck watches on a foreign voyage, which demonstrated that he did not possess and exercise the professional skills of an ordinary, prudent, licensed third mate from 11 January to 15 February 1980.Appeal No. 2267Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/12/198111/12/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2266 - BRENNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 January 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's License for a period of one month and further suspended it for two months on probation for two months, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Operator aboard the Tug FORT McHENRY, under the authority of the captioned document, did at about 0625 on or about 5 December 1980, in the James River in the state of Virginia, at or near the city of Richmond, fail to safely navigate said vessel in such a manner as to preclude the barge she was pushing from grounding on the edge of the channel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of five witnesses and four documents, one being a video tape recording of the vessels during the period in question.Appeal No. 2266Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/13/198110/13/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2265 - CAREYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 April 1980, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's document and all other valid Coast Guard documents for three (3) months on six (6) months' probation, upon finding him guilty of wrongful failure to join his vessel. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able bodied seaman aboard SS BEAVER STATE under authority of the document above captioned, on 24 November 1978, Appellant wrongfully failed to join his vessel off Labuan, Malaysia. The hearings were held at Long Beach, California, on 11 December 1979, and 8 January, 20 March and 11 April 1980. At the hearings on 11 December 1979 and 11 April 1980, Appellant appeared pro se, having been advised of his right to be represented by counsel of his choice and having waived this right at the hearing on 11 December 1979. At the hearing on 8 January 1980, the disposition of John Manning was taken on behalf of Appellant without Appellant or counsel present. At the brief hearing on 20 March 1980, the proceedings were continued, at Appellant's prior request, to 11 April 1980. At the hearing on 11 December 1979, Appellant had entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications.Appeal No. 2265Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/10/19819/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2264 - MCKNIGHTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 December 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's Operator's License for two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Operator on board the Tug Holly under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 March 1980, Appellant negligently absented himself from the wheelhouse of the said vessel, leaving the responsibilities of navigation of the said vessel and its tow to an unlicensed deckhand, Woodard Willis, thereby contributing to the said vessel's collision with the N.C. Highway #58 Bridge across the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at approximately Mile 225.9. The hearing was held at Wilmington, North Carolina, on 28 August 1980. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2264Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/8/19819/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2263 - HESTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and Title 46, Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 31 October 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for nine months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. four specifications were alleged to support the amended charge: First Specification: In that [Appellant], while serving as able Bodied Seaman aboard SS TRANSCOLORADO under authority of the captioned document, did not or about the 25th of February 1978, while said vessel was in the port of Liverpool, England, wrongfully assault and batter a fellow crewmember, Mr. Gerald R. Drayney. Second Specification: In that [Appellant], while serving as Able Seaman aboard the SS SANTA MARIA, under authority of the captioned document did on or about 4 November 1978, while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully fail to perform his duties properly due to intoxication. Third Specification: In that [Appellant], while serving on the SS SANTA MARIA, did on or about 4 November 1978, fail to obey a lawful order of the Master.Appeal No. 2263Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/8/19819/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2262 - SHERMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and Title 46, Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 June 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license and document for two months, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States M/V OCEAN PRINCE, O.N. 276461, under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 1545, on 10 March 1980, Appellant wrongfully failed to notify the nearest Marine Inspection Office as soon as possible of the collision of the Tank Barge HYGRADE 42, O.N. 515005 with the fender system of the Brightman Street Bridge in the Taunton River, causing damage in excess of fifteen hundred ($1500) dollars, as required by 46 CFR 4.05-1. The hearing was held at Providence, Rhode Island, on 25 March and 14 April 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2262Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/31/19818/31/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2261 - SAVOIEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 19 June 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for two months upon finding him guilty of the charges of misconduct and negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Master on board SS FORT WORTH, O.N. 247276, under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 21 February 1979, Appellant while navigating the vessel in the Taunton River, Fall River, Massachusetts, negligently failed to insure that the vessel's position was fixed and plotted on the chart of the area as required by 33 CFR 164.11, thereby contributing to the grounding of the vessel; and that while engaged as aforeside Appellant wrongfully failed to notify the nearest Marine Inspection Officer as soon as possible of the grounding of the vessel in the Taunton, Fall River, Massachusetts, as required by 46 CFR 4.05-1. The hearing was held at Providence, Rhode Island, on 12 March and 17-18 April 1979.Appeal No. 2261Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/12/19818/12/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2260 - BOGGANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 December 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Mobile, Alabama, suspended Appellant's documents outright for two months, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as First Assistant Engineer on board SS INTREPID under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 11 September 1979, Appellant wrongfully deserted the vessel at a foreign port, to wit: Guam, Mariana Islands. The hearing was held at Mobile, Alabama, on 16 November 1979. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2260Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/30/19817/30/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2259 - ROGERSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 December 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for one month on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator on board M/V CITY OF PITTSBURGH under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 1 October 1980, Appellant failed to maintain a proper watch on river conditions, which contributed to the grounding of tank barge AO-98 due to falling river conditions. The hearing was held at Louisville, Kentucky, on 19 November 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and seven documents.Appeal No. 2259Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/29/19817/19/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2258 - HOPKINSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Second Mate on board SS MONTPELIER VICTORY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 January 1979, Appellant: -negligently navigated the said vessel by failing to ascertain the said vessel's position between approximately 1600 and 1650; -did negligently plot upon the chart the 1610 fix incorrectly; -did negligently alter the vessel's course from 287° gyro to 300° without first properly fixing the vessel's position, contributing to the grounding of the said vessel; and -did negligently turn over the deck watch to the Third Officer, Walter S. BENECKY, without properly advising him of the vessel's position, thereby contributing to the grounding of the said vessel. The Administrative Law Judge found that the latter two specifications were proved as matters in aggravation with respect to the first two specifications found proved, and not as independent offenses.Appeal No. 2258Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2257 - MALANAPHYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months on eight months' probation, upon finding him guilty of the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Mate on board the M/V WALLA WALLA, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 May 1980, Appellant failed to respond promptly to a passenger's timely summons for help, thereby being unavailable to avert an assault which subsequently occurred, resulting in injury to a crew member. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington, on 30 June and 1 July 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and nine documents. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of three person, including his own, and one document.Appeal No. 2257Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2256 - MONTANEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.25-15. By order dated 25 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The three specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Ordinary Seaman on board SS BANNER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 10, 13 and 14 November 1979, Appellant failed to perform his duties as bow lookout. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts, on 29 November 1979 and 15 January 1980. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification on Appellant's behalf, and the hearing proceeded in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and four exhibits. No evidence was offered in defense.Appeal No. 2256Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2255 - BASIRThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated October 10, 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months, plus 4 months on 12 months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Able Seaman on board SS DELTA BOLIVIA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 2 December 1978, Appellant failed to perform his duties because of intoxication; failed to obey direct orders of the Third Mate and of the Chief Mate; wrongfully consumed alcoholic beverages aboard DELTA BOLIVIA, and used foul and abusive language toward the Third Mate. The hearing was held on 15 February, 3 and 5 April, 11, 14, and 29 May, and 11 and 28 June 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer submitted three exhibits and the sworn testimony of four witnesses. In defense, Appellant submitted eight exhibits and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2255Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/918112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2254 - YOUNGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 6 March 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as fireman-watertender on board SS AFRICAN NEPTUNE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 20 October 1977, Appellant had in his possession 1909.2 grams of marijuana, a controlled substance. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on December 13, 1978 and continued through February 7, 1979. At the initial hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The counsel representing Appellant at the hearing before the Administrative Law Judge failed to appear on several occasions, despite agreed dates. On 8 January 1979, the hearing proceeded without the presence of Appellant's counsel. At a subsequent session counsel did appear, and was afforded the opportunity of recalling the principal witness presented by the Investigating Officer. Appellant is now represented by substitute counsel.Appeal No. 2254Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/22/19817/22/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2253 - KIELYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 April 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve month's probation upon finding him guilty of inattention to duty. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Mate on board SS WORTH under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 2 June 1978, at Texaco Eagle Point Westville, New Jersey, on the Delaware River, Appellant failed to adequately supervise a ballast loading operation on his vessel, causing pollution of the navigable waters of the United States. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 15 October and 7 December 1979, 17 and 29 January 1980, and 30 April 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to each charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence statements of the Second Mate, Mr. William T. Smith; an affidavit of service on Appellant of 5 October 1979 by the Investigating Officer; and a Master's Report of Seaman Shipped or Discharged (CG-735(T)) dated 17 October 1979 for SS WORTH.Appeal No. 2253Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2252 - BOYCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 October 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Able Bodied Seaman on board SS AMERICAN CHARGER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 16 October 1978, Appellant, while said vessel was in the port of San Diego, California, wrongfully had in his possession narcotics. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 3 January and continued through 9 August 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness, a deposition, and three documentary exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered no evidence, but did submit a Memorandum of Law. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on 15 October 1979. Appeal was timely filed on 9 November 1979 and perfected on 7 February 1980.Appeal No. 2252Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2251 - FADLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The one specification found proved alleges that while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 5 August 1970, Appellant was convicted by the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of New York, a court of record, for violation of Section 220.05 of the Penal Law of the State of New York, for criminal possession of a dangerous drug, to wit; Hashish. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 25 July 1980. Appellant did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, which was held in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documents.Appeal No. 2251Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2250 - HADWARIThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 April 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after a hearing on several dates between 21 March and 6 April 1978, suspended. Appellant's document for a period of three months on probation of twelve months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The two specifications of the charge of misconduct found proved allege (1) that Appellant, while serving as ordinary seaman aboard SS AMERICAN AQUARIUS, under authority of the captioned document, did, on or about 22 January 1978, while said vessel was in the foreign port of Yokohoma, Japan, wrongfully fails to obey a lawful order of the Third Officer, to wit, go below; (2) that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did, on or about 22 January 1978, while said vessel was leaving the foreign port of Yokohoma, Japan, wrongfully direct obscene and abusive language at the Chief Officer. At the hearings Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2250Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19816/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2249 - DURANDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 November 1979, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for three months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The amended specification found proved alleged that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V PILOT, O.N. 580326, under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 22 September 1977, Appellant operated said vessel in the Southwest lane, in contravention of the Strait of Dover Traffic Separation Scheme promulgated under authority of IMCO Resolution A. 284 (VIII), 20 November 1973. A second amended specification, that Appellant did ship and discharge seaman without filing a report as required by 46 U.S.C. 643(1), was found not proved. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 23 April, 23 July, 28 September, and 4 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence thirteen documentary exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2249Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19816/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2248 - FREEMANThis review has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 19 June 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as operator/person-in-charge on board M/V IKE D and tow, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 January 1980, Appellant, while navigating the Mississippi River near New Orleans, La., above the Huey P. Long Bridge, in darkness between the hours of sunset and sunrise, wrongfully failed to show the required navigation lights on his towing vessel and the barge in tow. The hearing was held at New Orleans, La., on 21 February, 11 and 25 March, 1 and 29 April, 8 May, 16 June, and 2 July 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2248Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19816/8/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2247 - LUKOWSKIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 24 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's documents for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Ship's Utilityman on board the United States SS B.T. SAN DIEGO under authority of the document above captioned, on or above 4 April 1979, while the vessel was moored in Port Angeles, Washington, Appellant assaulted Boatswain Theodore Levy. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 3 and 29 August and 24 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2247Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19816/3/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2246 - CONWAYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 March 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Tankerman on board the TANK BARGE E 21, under authority of the document above captioned, at or about 20 July 1979, while the barge was moored in Perth Amboy, New Jersey, Appellant wrongfully caused the opening of the manifold valve before the hose connections were complete, thus permitting a harmful quantity of oil to spill into the Raritan River, a navigable water of the United States. The hearing was held at New York at various time from 16 August 1979, to 14 March of 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence three written statements, two documents, his own testimony, and that of a witness.Appeal No. 2246Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19816/3/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2245 - ROBINSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 February 1980, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, after hearings at New York, New York, on 29 November and 18 December 1978, and on 24 January, 14 February, 14 March, 9 May, 4 and 27 June, 9 and 16 July, 17 August, 19 September, and 7, 19 and 26 November 1979, revoked the captioned document upon finding Appellant guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct proved, alleges that Appellant, while serving as Fireman/Watertender aboard USNS ANDREW MILLER, under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document, did, at or about 2400, 12 March 1975, at Yokosuka, Japan, while said was in the port of Yokosuka, Japan, wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics to wit, heroin. Appellant appeared and was represented by counsel. No formal arraignment was held and no plea appears on the record of any of the hearings. It is clear that the proceedings were conducted as if a "not guilty" plea had been entered. Appellant was fully advised of the charges and specifications against him and of his rights. As in Decision on Appeal No. 867, there was no prejudice to Appellant because the hearing was conducted as though a plea of "not guilty" had been entered.Appeal No. 2245Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/29/19814/29/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2244 - JAHNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Pilot on board SS CORNUCOPIA under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 December 1979, while said vessel was enroute from San Francisco to Stockton, Appellant failed to properly maintain control of said vessel, resulting in CORNUCOPIA's colliding with and damaging Beacon #11 (LLNR891) an established U.S. aid to navigation; and that while serving as aforesaid, did fail to properly maintain control of said vessel resulting in its grounding. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 6 and 28 February and 7 and 14 March 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2244Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/28/19814/28/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2243 - TRIGGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of the charge of "inattention to duty." The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Assistant Engineer on board SS AMERICAN ARGOSY under authority of the document and license above described, on or about 24 May 1979, while the vessel was in Baltimore, Appellant negligently failed to adequately conduct oil transfer between No. 7 starboard fuel oil tank and No. 2 starboard settling tank, causing overflow of the settling tank into Baltimore Harbor and pollution of navigable waters of the United States (about 2 barrels). The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 20 June, 20 July, 16 August and 20 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer's evidence consisted of the testimony of one witness, the engine log, and documents concerning tank loading. In defense, Appellant offered his own testimony. Appellant also offered one document which was not admitted.Appeal No. 2243Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/2/19814/2/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2242 - JACKSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 August 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellants' seaman's documents upon finding them guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved in each case alleges that while serving on board SS DELTA PARAGUAY under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 7 July 1978, Appellants, at or about the steering engine room on board DELTA PARAGUAY did wrongfully have in their possession certain narcotics, to wit, marijuana. The hearing was held in joinder at Houston, Texas, on 20 and 31 July 1978. At the hearing, Appellants elected to act as their own counsel and entered pleas of not guilty to the charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2242Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/2/19814/2/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2241 - NIEDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 20 December 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, after a hearing at Long Beach, California, on 29 November 1978, suspended Appellant's documents for a period of three months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The single specification of the charge of negligence found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as pilot aboard M/T LION OF CALIFORNIA, under authority of his captioned documents, did on or about 19 September 1978, at 1759, navigate the vessel in a negligent manner so as to cause an allision between the vessel and M/V GLOMAR EXPLORER in Slip 240, Los Angeles Harbor. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer offered into evidence, without objection from Appellant, numerous copies of documents. It was stipulated between the parties that Appellant was serving as Pilot on board the LION OF CALIFORNIA at all times material and pertinent to the issue at hand, and that he had given all engine and rudder commands. The Investigating Officer introduced no further evidence.Appeal No. 2241Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/2/19814/2/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2240 - PALMERThis review has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 April 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Able Seaman on board S.S. THOMAS JEFFERSON under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 21 February 1980, Appellant did, while the vessel was in the port of Rotterdam, wrongfully assault and batter with a bottle a shipmate, Erick H. Sorensen, AB, Z-[REDACTED]-DI. The hearing was held at San Francisco on 21 April 1980. Appellant failed to appear at the hearing. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered in his behalf in accordance with 46 CFR 5.20-75, and the hearing proceeded in absentia. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2240Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/1/19814/1/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2239 - VINCENTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g), and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 August 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months, plus six months on twelve month's probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Fireman/Watertender on board SS AFRICAN DAWN under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 8 May 1978, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter with his hand the Third Assistant Engineer. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 22, 23 and 27 June 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of the Third Assistant Engineer and two pieces of documentary evidence: a certified abstract of line 31 of the shipping articles for SS AFRICAN DAWN, and a certified copy of pages 21 and 22 of the vessel's official logbook.Appeal No. 2239Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/23/19813/23/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2238 - MONTGOMERYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and Title 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 March 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Electrician on board SS MORMACARGO under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 29 October 1979, Appellant had in his possession a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 20 December 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and four documents.Appeal No. 2238Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/4/19813/4/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2237 - STRELICThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 17 September 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license number 388 977 and all other valid Coast Guard licenses issued to Appellant for three (3) months on twelve (12) month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board SS AMOCO CONNECTICUT, under authority of the license and document above captioned, on or about 20 December 1978, Appellant negligently failed to ensure that the vessel's position was fixed and plotted on a chart of the area, Narragansett Bay, which is a part of the navigable waters of the United States. The hearings were held at Providence, Rhode Island, on 16 January, 13 March, 22 May and 10 July 1979. At the hearings, Appellant was represented by counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence an Affidavit of Service of the Charge Sheet; Charts of Narragansett Bay (No. 13223), Martha's Vineyard (No. 13218), and Providence River (No. 13224); the testimony of LT William J. Morani; the deposition of Francis J. Smith, Second Mate; and log entries of the AMOCO CONNECTICUT for 19 and 20 December 1978.Appeal No. 2237Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/26/19812/26/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2236 - CLUFFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 25 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland, suspended Appellant's United States Coast Guard First Class Pilot's License No. 457718 for 3 months on 12 month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot on board M/V MOSEL under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 2 March 1979, while the said vessel in the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, Appellant failed to navigate the vessel with due caution, thereby causing an allision between the raised heavy lift boom of the vessel and the Reedy Point Bridge. The hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on 22 May 1979 and adjourned to 7 September 1979, on which date it was concluded. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2236Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/23/19812/23/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2235 - RABRENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 November 1978, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Pilot on board SS GULF TIGER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 13 August 1978, Appellant did, while inbound in Tampa Bay, Florida, wrongfully ground said vessel. A second specification, found not proved, alleged that while serving in the above capacity Appellant negligently piloted said vessel at excessive speed, thereby contributing to the grounding. The hearing was held at Tampa, Florida, on 22 November 1978. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2235Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2234 - REIMANNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 7 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, suspended Appellant's license for two months, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board SS AVILA under authority of the license above captioned, at or about 0830, 19 June 1979, Appellant negligently failed to take adequate precautions to prevent the overfilling of Number 3 starboard tank and subsequent spilling of a harmful quantity of oil into the navigable waters of the United States. The hearing was held at Embarcadero Center, Suite 310, San Francisco, California, on 27 July, 16 August, 20 August, 5 September, and 14 September 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and, in Appellant's absence from the first session, a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf.Appeal No. 2234Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/9/19812/9/198112/21/2017
Page 10 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.