• TJAG Home Page
  • CGCCA Home Page
  • Oral Argument Schedule
  • Appellate Briefs
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Orders
  • CGCCA Rules of Appellate Procedure with JRAP (Mar 2025)
CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V DECKER WITH DISSENT - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V DECKER WITH DISSENT - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1436Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 7/13/20177/13/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MOLINARY - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V MOLINARY - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1440Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 7/12/20177/12/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V KENDZIORSKI - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V KENDZIORSKI - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1439Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 6/12/20176/12/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsORDER PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF COOPER V FAYPetitioner is an accused at a general court-martial convened by Commander, Atlantic Area. He has filed a Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, and requests a stay of further proceedings while this Court considers the matter. He seeks an order directed to the military judge, ordering him “to respect the orders of the Courts of the States of Washington and Idaho.” Charges against Petitioner were preferred on 27 September 2016, charging him with false official statement in a specification alleging that he falsely signed an official record that was false in that CC was not his spouse; and with larceny of services in a specification alleging that he falsely pretended that CC was eligible for medical benefits. He asserts that the State of Washington, by order dated November 18, 2016, recognizes a marriage between him and CC from October 11, 2000. Petitioner’s grievance lies in the military judge’s order of 18 April 2017, denying Petitioner’s motion for a ruling that, as a matter of law, Petitioner and CC have been married continuously from October 11, 2000 to present without interruption.MISC. DOCKET NO. 002-17Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals6/4/20176/4/201710/7/2019
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V WILSON - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V WILSON - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1435Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 5/1/20175/1/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V HEXIMER - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V HEXIMER - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1434Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 4/17/20174/17/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V HAMILTON - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V HAMILTON - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1432Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 4/12/20174/12/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V KIRBY - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V KIRBY - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1433Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 3/20/20173/20/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BURKE - UNPLUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V BURKE - UNPLUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1431Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 2/16/20172/16/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MAKSIN - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V MAKSIN - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1430Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 1/30/20171/30/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BUSH - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V BUSH - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsDocket No. 1397Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals1/28/20171/28/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V HINOJOSA - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V HINOJOSA - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1429Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 1/23/20171/23/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V HENDERSON - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V HENDERSON - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1426Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 1/5/20171/5/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BAILEY - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V BAILEY - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals OpinionDocket No. 1428Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 1/4/20171/4/20179/1/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V STEMMERMAN - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V STEMMERMAN - UNPUBLISHED Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsDocket No. 1427Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals12/7/201612/7/20169/1/2017
Page 6 of 34

Oral Arguments

Pursuant to U.S. Department of Defense Standard carrying out Article 140a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [10 U.S.C. s. 940a] (revised, January 2025), an audio recording of an oral argument will typically be made publicly accessible. Audio recordings for oral arguments after the effective date of this new rule (January 2025) are below. As part of this requirement, a military service provides a mechanism by which a written transcript may be made available upon request. Contact HQS-DG-LST-CG-LMJ@uscg.mil with the reason for the request. 

 

Parties Docket Audio File Date
U.S. v. Ray 1498 MP3 2025/05/13
U.S. v. Kelley 1495 MP3 2025/03/26