CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V DIRE - 46 MJ 804UNITED STATES V DIRE Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1077Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals6/12/19976/12/19978/25/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MADIGAR - 46 MJ 802UNITED STATES V MADIGAR - Court of Criminal Appeal DecisionDocket No. 1056Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals6/5/19976/5/19978/25/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V CRAWFORD - 46 MJ 771UNITED STATES V CRAWFORD - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1052Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals5/27/19975/27/19978/25/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V RYDER - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V RYDER- Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 947Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals4/23/19974/23/19978/25/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BECKERMAN - 48 MJ 898UNITED STATES V BECKERMAN - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 954Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals3/18/19973/18/19978/25/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V TOWNSEND - 46 MJ 517UNITED STATES V TOWNSEND - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 981Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals3/12/19973/12/19978/25/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BALL - 45 MJ 620UNITED STATES V BALL - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1049Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals1/29/19971/29/19978/25/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V THOMAS (MERITS)Per curiam: Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of three specifications of indecent conduct, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The court sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for five months. The Convening Authority approved the sentence, and suspended confinement in excess of 120 days in accordance with the pretrial agreement. Judgment was entered accordingly. Before this Court, without admitting that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, Appellant has submitted this case on its merits as to any and all errors.Docket No. 1476Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals12/10/202112/13/2021
Page 34 of 34

Oral Arguments


Pursuant to U.S. Department of Defense Standard carrying out Article 140a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [10 U.S.C. s. 940a] (revised, January 2025), an audio recording of an oral argument will typically be made publicly accessible. Audio recordings for oral arguments after the effective date of this new rule (January 2025) are below. As part of this requirement, a military service provides a mechanism by which a written transcript may be made available upon request. Contact HQS-DG-LST-CG-LMJ@uscg.mil with the reason for the request. 

 

Parties Docket Audio File Date
U.S. v. Ray 1498 MP3 2025/05/13
U.S. v. Kelley 1495 MP3 2025/03/26