| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BALL - 45 MJ 620 | UNITED STATES V BALL - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 1049 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 1/29/1997 | 1/29/1997 | | 8/25/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V JENNINGS - 49 MJ 549 | UNITED STATES V JENNINGS - Court of Criminal Appeal Decision | Docket No. 1043 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 9/4/1998 | 9/4/1998 | | 8/29/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V. CORREA (MERITS) | Appellant was tried by general court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of three specifications of failing to obey a lawful order by wrongfully possessing drug paraphernalia in government housing, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); two specifications of false official statements, in violation of Article 107, UCMJ; five specifications of distribution, possession with intent to distribute, introduction, and use of a controlled substance, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ; and one specification of conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for twelve months, reduction to E-1, and a bad-conduct discharge. The Convening Authority approved the sentence. The pretrial agreement did not affect the sentence. | Docket No. 0368 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 5/15/2019 | 5/15/2019 | | 5/21/2019 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MILLER - 61 MJ 827 | Appellant was tried by special court-martial military judge alone on 21 November 2003. After conviction of various drug offenses pursuant to pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was sentenced by the judge to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-1, which the Convening Authority approved on 18 June 2004. | DOCKET NO. 005-69-01 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/19/2005 | 10/19/2005 | | 10/24/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V RANDOLPH - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V RANDOLPH - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 003-62-16 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 5/9/2016 | 5/9/2016 | | 9/1/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V TEVELEIN RECONSIDERATION ENBANC - 75 MJ 708 | UNITED STATES V TEVELEIN RECONSIDERATION ENBANC - 75 MJ 708
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 002-69-13 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 6/29/2016 | 6/29/2016 | | 9/1/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | United States V TEVELEIN (UNPUBLISHED) | United States V TEVELEIN (UNPUBLISHED)
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Opinion | Docket No. 002-69-13 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 9/6/2013 | 9/6/2013 | | 9/18/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V MEADOR - 75 MJ 682 | UNITED STATES V MEADOR - 75 MJ 682
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 002-62-16 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 4/19/2016 | 4/19/2016 | | 9/1/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | United States V BISEL (UNPUBLISHED) | United States V BISEL (UNPUBLISHED)
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Opinion | Docket No. 002-62-13 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/16/2013 | 10/16/2013 | | 9/18/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V SAPP (2023 WL 5440570) | Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officers. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of one specification of assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); and one specification of conduct unbecoming an officer by providing false information on an application for a concealed handgun permit, in violation of Article 133, UCMJ. The court sentenced Appellant to forfeiture of $3,920 per month for three months, 60 days restriction, and a punitive letter of reprimand. Judgment was entered accordingly.
Before this Court, Appellant has assigned the following errors:
I. The evidence is legally insufficient to prove that Appellant knowingly provided false information when his incomplete concealed handgun permit application was improperly filed by the Arlington County Circuit Court before he had signed it or attested that the information in the application was correct and complete under the penalty of perjury.
2
II. The military judge abused his discretion when he permitted Ms. JB to provide an unsworn victim impact statement during presentencing proceedings in violation of R.C.M. 1001(c) when she was not the victim of an offense of which appellant was found guilty.
We determine that the findings and sentence are correct in law and, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved. Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence, as approved below, are affirmed. | Docket No. 001-69-23 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 8/23/2023 | 8/23/2023 | | 8/23/2023 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BROWN (82 M.J. 702) | A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of three specifications of disrespect toward a petty officer and one specification of violation of a lawful general order prohibiting sexual harassment, in violation of Articles 91 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The court sentenced Appellant to reduction to E-4, a reprimand, and restriction for thirty days. The convening authority approved the sentence. Judgment was entered accordingly. Approving Appellant’s timely application, the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Coast Guard, sent the case to this Court pursuant to Article 69(d), UCMJ.
The findings of guilty to Specification 2 of Charge II and to Charge II are set aside. Specification 2 of Charge II and Charge II are dismissed with prejudice. Only so much of the sentence as provides for reduction to E-6, a reprimand, and restriction for thirty days is approved. The current reprimand, which references the sexual harassment conviction, is set aside. A revised reprimand shall be substituted. We determine that the remaining findings and the reassessed sentence are correct in law and, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved. Accordingly, the remaining findings of guilty and the sentence, as reassessed, are affirmed. | Docket No. 001-69-21 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 6/6/2022 | 6/6/2022 | | 6/8/2022 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BROWN (2ND) OPINION (UNPUBLISHED) | A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of three specifications of disrespect toward a petty officer and one specification of violation of a lawful general order prohibiting sexual harassment, in violation of Articles 91 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The court sentenced Appellant to reduction to E-4, a reprimand, and restriction for thirty days. The convening authority approved the sentence. Judgment was entered accordingly. Approving Appellant’s timely application, the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Coast Guard, sent the case to this Court pursuant to Article 69(d), UCMJ.
Decision
Only so much of the sentence as provides for a reprimand and restriction for thirty days is approved. The current reprimand, which references the sexual harassment conviction, is set aside. A revised reprimand shall be substituted. We determine that the remaining findings and the newly reassessed sentence are correct in law and, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved. Accordingly, the remaining findings of guilty and the sentence, as reassessed, are affirmed. | Docket No. 001-69-21 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 7/19/2024 | 7/19/2024 | | 7/22/2024 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V SULLIVAN - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V SULLIVAN - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Opinion | Docket No. 001-69-13 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 9/25/2014 | 9/25/2014 | | 9/18/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V JOHANSON 71 MJ 688 | UNITED STATES V JOHANSON 71 MJ 688
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 001-69-12 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/2012 | 11/21/2012 | | 9/18/2017 |
| Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V DATZ - 59 MJ 510 | Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas of not guilty, he was convicted of the following offenses: one specification of striking a Petty Officer and one specification of treating a Petty Officer with contempt in violation of Article 91, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); three specifications of dereliction of duty and one specification of violating a lawful general regulation in violation of Article 92, UCMJ; one specification of rape in violation of Article 120, UCMJ; and one specification of unlawful entry in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. The members sentenced Appellant to reduction to pay grade E-3 and confinement for three months. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged, and the Acting Judge Advocate General of the Coast Guard referred the record to this Court pursuant to Article 69(d), UCMJ. | Docket No. 001-69-01 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 8/6/2003 | 8/6/2003 | | 10/5/2017 |