Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BERNARD 71 MJ 685 | UNITED STATES V BERNARD 71 MJ 685
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals - Opinion | Docket No. 1328 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/2/2012 | 11/2/2012 | | 9/18/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BENTLEY PER CURIAM | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of wrongful use of marijuana, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); and seven specifications of larceny of military property of the United States Coast Guard, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for eight months, and reduction to E-2. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged. The pretrial agreement had no effect on the sentence. | Docket No. 1234 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 7/8/2005 | 7/8/2005 | | 10/24/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BENNETT PER CURIAM | Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of the following offenses: two specifications of wrongfully using marijuana, two specifications of wrongfully using cocaine, and one specification of wrongfully distributing cocaine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The military judge sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 150 days, and reduction to E-1. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged, but suspended confinement in excess of ninety days for twelve months. The pretrial agreement had no effect on the sentence. | Docket No. 1238 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 8/17/2005 | 8/17/2005 | | 10/24/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BENEDICT - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V BENEDICT - UNPUBLISHED - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeal Decision | Docket No. 1083 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 4/21/2000 | 4/21/2000 | | 8/30/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BENEDICT - 59 MJ 563 | UNITED STATES V BENEDICT - 59 MJ 563
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 1083 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 8/16/2002 | 8/16/2002 | | 9/15/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BEGIN - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V BEGIN - UNPUBLISHED - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 1150 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 8/29/2001 | 8/29/2001 | | 8/31/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BEFFORD - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V BEFFORD - UNPUBLISHED - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 1144 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 4/23/2001 | 4/23/2001 | | 8/31/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BECKERMAN - 48 MJ 898 | UNITED STATES V BECKERMAN - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 954 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 3/18/1997 | 3/18/1997 | | 8/25/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BEALE - 54 MJ 651 | UNITED STATES V BEALE - 54 MJ 651 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 1136 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/11/2000 | 12/11/2000 | | 8/30/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BAYLE - 56 MJ 762 | UNITED STATES V BAYLE - 56 MJ 762
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 1152 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 2/21/2002 | 2/21/2002 | | 8/31/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BARKER - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V BARKER - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals - Opinion | Docket No. 1340 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/17/2011 | 11/17/2011 | | 9/18/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BANKS - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V BANKS - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 1411 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 7/1/2016 | 7/1/2016 | | 9/1/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BALL - 45 MJ 620 | UNITED STATES V BALL - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals Decision | Docket No. 1049 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 1/29/1997 | 1/29/1997 | | 8/25/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BAKER - UNPUBLISHED | UNITED STATES V BAKER - UNPUBLISHED
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | Docket No. 1419 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 9/12/2016 | 9/12/2016 | | 9/1/2017 |
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | UNITED STATES V BAILEY (UNPUBLISHED) | Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of members with enlisted representation. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of three specifications of sexual assault and one specification of abusive sexual contact, all in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The members sentenced Appellant to confinement for eighteen months, reduction to E-1, a dishonorable discharge, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. The Convening Authority approved the sentence as adjudged.
This is our second review of this case. In our first review, we affirmed the findings and the sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) granted a petition for review and affirmed our decision as to findings but reversed as to sentence. United States v. Bailey, 71 M.J. 11, 16 (C.A.A.F. 2017). CAAF noted that although we had affirmed the sentence as approved—which included forfeiture of all pay and allowances—we failed to reference the forfeitures when reciting the sentence in our opening paragraph. CAAF concluded that our opinion was thus ambiguous and ordered the record remanded for clarification. Id. at 15–16.
Our omission of reference to forfeiture of pay and allowances was a scrivener's error. We now clarify by affirming the entire approved sentence, including forfeiture of all pay and allowances. | Docket No. 1428 | Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals | 2/5/2018 | 2/5/2018 | | 2/6/2018 |