• TJAG Home Page
  • CGCCA Home Page
  • Oral Argument Schedule
  • Appellate Briefs
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Orders
  • CGCCA Rules of Appellate Procedure with JRAP (Mar 2025)
CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V WEST - 56 MJ 626UNITED STATES V WEST - 56 MJ 626 Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1145Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals10/28/200110/28/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BEFFORD - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V BEFFORD - UNPUBLISHED - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1144Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals4/23/20014/23/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V MOORE - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V MOORE - UNPUBLISHED - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1143Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals3/12/20013/12/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V COCKROFT - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V COCKROFT - UNPUBLISHED - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1142Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals3/14/20013/14/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V TARDIF - 55 MJ 666UNITED STATES V TARDIF - 55 MJ 666 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1141Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals3/26/20013/26/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V TARDIF (RECONSIDERATION) - 55 MJ 670UNITED STATES V TARDIF (RECONSIDERATION) - 55 MJ 670 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1141Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals4/25/20014/25/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V TARDIF - 58 MJ 714On 26 March 2001, when we first reviewed this case, this Court set aside a twelve day unauthorized absence conviction and dismissed that charge and specification,. We affirmed the remaining findings of guilty of assaulting a child under 16 years of age and the approved sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for two years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to paygrade E-1. On 25 April 2001, this Court reconsidered and reaffirmed that decision, and, in addition, ordered confinement credit pursuant to United States v. Allen, 17 M.J. 126 (C.A.A.F. 1984) for twelve days of incarceration by civil authorities, which had formed the basis for the earlier unauthorized absence charge. In separate opinions to both of those decisions, I concurred with all but the affirming of two years confinement. Following United States v. Collazo, 53 M.J. 721 (A. Ct. Crim. App. 2000), I would have reduced the confinement to 21 months based on a delay of 115 days in forwarding the record for review by this Court after the convening authority had acted.Docket No. 1141Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals5/14/20035/14/200310/5/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V WILLIAMS - JR - 54 MJ 757UNITED STATES V WILLIAMS - JR - 54 MJ 757- Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1140Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals2/7/20012/7/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V LABEAN 56 MJ 587UNITED STATES V LABEAN 56 MJ 587 Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1139Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals10/7/200110/7/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V ANDERSON - 55 MJ 588UNITED STATES V ANDERSON - 55 MJ 588 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1138Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals4/27/20014/27/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V GREENING - 54 MJ 831UNITED STATES VV GREENING - 54 MJ 831 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1137Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals3/28/20013/28/20018/31/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V BEALE - 54 MJ 651UNITED STATES V BEALE - 54 MJ 651 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1136Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals12/11/200012/11/20008/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V GUNDERSON - 54 MJ 593UNITED STATES V GUNDERSON - 54 MJ 593 - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1135Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals11/30/200011/30/20008/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V DITTY - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V DITTY - UNPUBLISHED - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals DecisionDocket No. 1134Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals11/1/200011/1/20008/30/2017
Coast Guard Court of Criminal AppealsUNITED STATES V SHERMAN - UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES V SHERMAN - UNPUBLISHED - Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeal DecisionDocket No. 1133Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals9/26/20009/26/20008/30/2017
Page 27 of 34

Oral Arguments

Pursuant to U.S. Department of Defense Standard carrying out Article 140a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [10 U.S.C. s. 940a] (revised, January 2025), an audio recording of an oral argument will typically be made publicly accessible. Audio recordings for oral arguments after the effective date of this new rule (January 2025) are below. As part of this requirement, a military service provides a mechanism by which a written transcript may be made available upon request. Contact HQS-DG-LST-CG-LMJ@uscg.mil with the reason for the request. 

 

Parties Docket Audio File Date
U.S. v. Ray 1498 MP3 2025/05/13
U.S. v. Kelley 1495 MP3 2025/03/26