CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2384 - WILLIAMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 21 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as oiler aboard the S/S INGER, under authority of the above captioned document, Appellant did, on or about 29 March 1983 "wrongfully have in [his] possession certain narcotics, to wit: Marijuana." The hearing was held at Houston, Texas, on 23 May 1983. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. Appellant was assisted by his father. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits, and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2384Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/27/19852/27/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2383 - SWIEREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 August 1984 an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a dangerous drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the license and document above captioned, on or about 12 October 1979, Appellant was convicted by the U. S. District court for the Eastern District of Texas of Violating a dangerous drug law of the United States, to wit: marijuana possession. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 31 August 1984. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2383Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19852/22/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2382 - NILSENThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 1 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as Master of the S/S SAN JUAN, under the authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did on 11 February 1980, while said vessel was departing San Juan, Puerto Rico, fail to navigate the vessel within the confines of the Bar Channel causing said vessel to ground. Two other specifications were dismissed, one on motion of the Investigating Officer, the other on motion of Appellant. The hearing was held at San Juan, Puerto Rico, on 3 February, 4 February, and 31 March 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification.Appeal No. 2382Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/22/19852/22/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2381 - GURGIOLOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 June 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of the charge of conviction for a dangerous drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while holder of the captioned license, was convicted on 2 September 1982 of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 846, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The hearing was held in Miami, Florida on 17 May 1984. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by two non-attorney representatives and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence four documents.Appeal No. 2381Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/20/19852/20/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2380 - HALLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C.7702 (b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 February 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's mariner's license for two months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V LOUIS FRANK, under the authority of the above captioned license, at or about 2330, 25 April 1983, Appellant did cause his tow to allide with the Florence Highway Bridge at Mile 56.0 of the Illinois River. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on 2-3 June 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documentary exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2380Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/8/19852/8/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2379 - DRUMThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 November 1983, Administrative Law Judge of the united States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for one month plus an additional two months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V DAVID ESPER under the authority of the above captioned license, Appellant did, on or about 9 May 1983, while pushing twelve loaded coal barges downbound on the Ohio River, fail to navigate his vessel so as to avoid alliding with the Big Four Railroad Bridge at approximately mile 603 on the Ohio River. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on 12 July 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2379Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/8/19852/8/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2378 - CALICCHIOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 October 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for a period of six months remitted on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant while serving as Master aboard the M/V POLING BROS. NO. 7: ...while transiting out bound the CNJ Railroad Bridge in Newark Bay, NJ, did on or about 0930, 21 July 1983 negligently fail to navigate your vessel with due caution resulting in a collision between your vessel, the M/V POLING BROS. No. 7 and the Great Lakes Drill Barge No. 7 which was anchored in the East Draw of Newark Bay, NJ engaged in demolition operations. The hearing was held in New York, New York, on 13, 16 and 26 September 1983.Appeal No. 2378Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/8/19852/8/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2377 - HICKEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 May 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Maine revoked Appellant's seaman's document and license upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a dangerous drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the documents above captioned, on or about 23 March 1984, Appellant was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Maine for conspiring to import large quantities of marijuana into the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence 2 exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence 6 exhibits and his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then entered an order revoking the merchant mariner's license and document issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2377Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/7/19852/7/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2376 - FRANKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as utility 3rd on board the S.S. ASHLEY LYKES under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 February 1983, while said vessel was in the port of Houston, Texas, Appellant wrongfully possessed certain narcotics, to wit: hashish and marijuana. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 28 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to him.Appeal No. 2376Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/2/19852/2/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2375 - CLEMENTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1983 an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license and document for two months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct, charged as a violation of statute. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal on 2 November 1983. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the uninspected towed vessel M/V JOAN CENAC, under authority of the above captioned license, on or about 10 April, 1983, Appellant wrongfully absented himself from the wheelhouse for a period of approximately four (4) hours leaving the responsibility for navigation of the vessel and tow to an unlicensed mate, in violation of 46 U.S.C. 405(b)(2). The hearing was held in Port Aurthur, Texas on 10 May 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel.He entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence six exhibits and one witness. In defense, Appellant introduced into evidence one document and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2375Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/11/19851/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2374 - JETERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 (b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as fleet chef aboard the SS EXXON SAN FRANCISCO, under the authority of the document above captioned, on or about 24 December 1981, while the vessel was at sea, Appellant did wrongfully rape a crew member of the vessel, namely, Robin Casson. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas 14 December 1982, 22 and 24 January 1983, 9 February 1983 and 13 and 15 April 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses, transcripts of depositions of six additional witnesses, and seven other exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, the testimony of two additional witnesses, transcripts of depositions of four witnesses, and three other exhibits.Appeal No. 2374Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/23/198411/23/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2373 - OLDOWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g), and 46 CFR 5930-1. By order dated 25 April 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's license for two months on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V SHAMAN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 22 July 1982, Appellant failed to properly navigate the vessel in the confined waters adjacent to Knights Island, Prince William Sound, Alaska, thereby contributing to the grounding of the vessel. The hearing, was held at Anchorage, Alaska on 4 and 5 January, 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2373Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/16/198410/16/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2372 - COLLAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 CFR 5.30-15(a)(1). The hearing was held on 2 May 1984 and 7 June 1984 at Baltimore, Maryland. By order dated 7 June 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license and seaman's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification alleges that while serving as Second Mate aboard the SS CORONADO, under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 1 April 1983, Appellant did fail to perform his duty as deck watch officer by falling asleep on the wheelhouse settee while the vessel was at anchor. On 28 June 1984, the Appellant requested a temporary license and document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order dated 3 July 1984.Appeal No. 2372Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/5/198410/5/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2371 - MCFATEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Assistant Engineer on board the M/V WARRIOR under authority of the above captioned documents did, on or about 16 September 1980, wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Engineer, Mr. Matthew P. Laving, with a deadly weapon, to wit, a knife, and inflicted severe bodily harm while the vessel was underway in San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 25 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced five documents and the testimony of two witnesses into evidence. In defense, Appellant introduced his own testimony into evidence.Appeal No. 2371Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/27/19849/27/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2370 - LEWISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V EXXON CRYSTAL RIVER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 10 February 1983, Appellant negligently failed to safely navigate a flotilla consisting of the M/V EXXON CRYSTAL RIVER and EXXON BARGE NUMBER 32, resulting in an allision between the flotilla and the Koch Oil Terminal Pier in Newport News, Virginia. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 17 March 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2370Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/5/19849/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2369 - ASHLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license for two months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V ELDORADO under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 1400, 22 January 1983, Appellant failed "to maneuver his vessel with caution, placing it in risk of a collision with the SS EXXON GALVESTON, and making it necessary for the SS EXXON GALVESTON, which was to the right in a crossing situation, to make an emergency maneuver." The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 10 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2369Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/22/19848/22/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2368 - MADJIWITAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 March 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's license for two months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot on board the Panamanian vessel, the M/V PASSAT, under the authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 August 1983, Appellant negligently failed to insure that there was adequate clearance between the vessel's #4 cargo hatch boom and the Tower Drive Bridge, which spans the Fox River at Green Bay, Wisconsin, prior to transiting beneath the bridge, causing the boom to strike the bridge. The hearing was held at Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin on 25 August 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2368Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/14/19848/14/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2367 - SPENCERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5. 30-1. By order dated 12 September 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's mariner's license for two months, plus two months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V RUST FLOWERS, under authority of the above captioned license, at or about 1955, 14 April 1983, Appellant did cause his tow to allide with the tank barge CE-64, the crane barge number 2, the freight barge VL-361, and the freight barge PB-142, while they were moored at the National Marine Services repair facility, mile 196.6, upper Mississippi River. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on 4 May 1983, and 1 June 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2367Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/17/19847/17/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2366 - MONAGHANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 December 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri suspended Appellant's mariner's license for two months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V STEEL PIONEER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 7 May 1983, Appellant navigated his flotilla in such a manner that the port lead barge allided with the guidewall at Markland Lock, Ohio River. The hearing was held at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on 18 August 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2366Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/16/19847/16/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2365 - EASTMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 August 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Maine suspended Appellant's license for two months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. The specification found proved under the charge of negligence alleges that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V VIKING SUN under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 21 June 1981, Appellant continued the voyage of the M/V VIKING SUN into hazardous waters after the starboard engine stalled. The specifications found proved under the charge of misconduct allege that Appellant wrongfully: (1) failed to provide the passengers with emergency procedures in accordance with 46 CFR 185.25-1 and (2) operated the M/V VIKING SUN while carrying passengers without a valid certificate of inspection. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine on 15, 16, and 17 June 1982.Appeal No. 2365Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/10/19847/10/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2364 - CAMPANAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 August 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as wiper on board the United States S.S. PRESIDENT PIERCE under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 1600, 21 April 1983, Appellant did wrongfully disobey a lawful order of the First Engineer, Roy A. Carlson, in that he refused to pick up debris. The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 8 August 1983. Appellant did not appear at the hearing and was not represented. The hearing proceeded in absentia. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty on behalf of Appellant. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits.Appeal No. 2364Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/10/19847/10/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2363 - MANNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S. Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's Seaman's License for three months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the M/V CAPTAIN HORNBLOWER, under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did on 16 and 17 February 1981, while carrying 66 and 48 passengers respectively between the hours of 1900 and 2300 each day, wrongfully operate said vessel, a non-Coast Guard certificated vessel, in violation of the provisions of 46 U.S.C. 390c(a). The hearing was held at san Francisco, California, on 2 March, 2 April, 7 April, 1 May, 7 May, 24 June, and 7 July 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2363Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2362 - ARNOLDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 4l United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for ten months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as able-bodied seaman on board the SS PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 12 December 1981 through 19 December 1981, Appellant wrongfully saved in the capacity noted his document was in the possession of the Coast Guard in Compliance with a Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge's order. The hearing was held in Seattle, Washington on 9 September, 20 October, and 17 December 1982. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Prior to arraignment, Appellant moved for dismissal. The motion was denied. After denial of the motion to dismiss and upon being arraigned, Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge an specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence sixteen documents. The Appellant offered no defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered and oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and single specification had been proved by plea. He then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issues to Appellant for a period of ten months. The entire decision was served on 12 January 1983. Appeal was timely filed on 22 December 1982, and perfected on 23 March 1983.Appeal No. 2362Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2361 - ZEMELThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g), 23b and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 July 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Cost Guard at Long Beach, California revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct and the charge of having been a user of a narcotic drug. The specifications found proved allege that while acting under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 14 May 1979, Appellant made a false or fraudulent statement on CG Form 719B (Rev. 9-72), Seaman's Certificate Application, by declaring that he had used a narcotic drug, which declaration was false; and that while being the holder of the document above captioned, on or about 10 September 1982 and for an unknown period of time before, Appellant was wrongfully a user of a narcotic drug. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 28 May, 27 June, and 18 July 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three documents and the testimony of one witness. Appellant offered no evidence in defense.Appeal No. 2361Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2360 - WILKINS.PDFThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 September 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board M/V FREEDOM under authority of the above captioned license on or about 28 January 1981, Appellant exceeded the scope of his license by navigating the enrolled, coastwise, seagoing barge OCEAN 193, while not on the high seas, without having on board a properly licensed pilot as required. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida on 7 July 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was not present but was represented by professional counsel. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf. A stipulation of facts was entered into between Appellant's counsel and the Investigating Officer. The Investigating Officer also introduced in evidence an additional document and stipulated to Appellant's negative prior record.Appeal No. 2360Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2359 - WAINEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order date 15 December 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for four months, plus four months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. The specifications found proved under the charge of negligence allege that while serving as Master on board the United States M/V AURIGA, Appellant on or about 10 August 1981, while navigating in conditions of fog and restricted visibility: (1) failed to obtain, or properly use, information available to him from radar observations to determine the course and speed of another vessel in his vicinity, thereby contributing to a collision with the SS NAUSHON; (2) failed to use the bridge-to-bridge radiotelephone to determine the course and speed of another vessel in his vicinity, thereby contributing to a collision; (3) failed to navigate with caution during fog, notwithstanding the fact that information of the proximity and approach of another vessel was available to him from radar observations.Appeal No. 2359Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/12/19846/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2358 - BUISSETThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C,. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 29 October 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia suspended Appellant's license for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specifications found proved under the charge of misconduct allege that while serving as Operator on board the United States M/V SHARON B. under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 24 July, while said vessel was pushing the barge JEANNE MARIE in the Tangier Sound, Appellant wrongfully failed to maintain a proper lookout and wrongfully failed to take action to avoid a collision with the 19 foot motorboat, Registration No. MD-9267-P. The specification found proved under the charge of negligence alleges that while serving as aforementioned, on the same date, while said vessel was pushing the barge JEANNE MARIE in the Tangier Sound, Appellant failed to navigate the vessel with due caution, thereby causing a collision with the 19 foot motorboat, Registration No. MD-9267-P.Appeal No. 2358Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19846/8/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2357 - GEESEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 11 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for a period of six months, remitted on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. Three specifications were found proved. The first alleges that on 7 February 1982, Appellant, while serving as second mate on board the SS PRESIDENT MADISON under authority of the above captioned documents, failed to perform his duties due to intoxication. The second and third specifications allege failure to obey direct orders of the Master to go below after being relieved of his bridge watch. The hearing was initially convened on board the SS PRESIDENT MADISON at San Francisco, California on 16 August 1982, and continued at Alameda, California on 9 November 1982, 7 February 1983, and 14 February 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses and several documents.Appeal No. 2357Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19846/8/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2356 - FOSTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V CHARGER, under the authority of the above captioned license, on or about 24 and 25 April 1981 Appellant wrongfully: operated the vessel while under the influence of intoxicating beverages while carrying passengers; molested one or more female passengers by using improper an suggestive language and placing his hands on their private parts in a lewd and lascivious manner against the female passengers' will; and used a narcotic drug by smoking a marijuana cigarette. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii on 14 May 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and to each specification.Appeal No. 2356Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2355 - RHULEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 March 1982, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while holder of the captioned license, was convicted on 10 August 1981 of possession of narcotics, to wit, cannabis, by the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit for Broward County, Florida. The hearing was held in Miami, Florida on 12 March 1982. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence two documents. In defense, Appellant introduced various items of documentary evidence and made an unsworn statement in mitigation.Appeal No. 2355Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2354 - DITMARSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) 46 CFR 5.30-1 and 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 26 May 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard, at Miami, Florida, revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding proved the charge of convict ion for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the license above captioned, on or about 23 December 1982 Appellant was convicted of knowingly, intentionally, and unlawfully possessing a controlled substance, to wit, marijuana. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida on 26 May 1983. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigation Officer introduced in evidence five documents including a copy of the judgement of conviction of the New Jersey Superior Court, Mercer County, in the case State of New Jersey v. Gary Neal Ditmars, and a true copy of the indictment filed in the same ease.Appeal No. 2354Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/5/19846/5/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2353 - EDGELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana suspended Appellant's seaman's document for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Qualified Member of the Engine Department (QMED) on board the SS DELTA NORTE, under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 27 December 1982, Appellant did wrongfully engage in mutual combat with a fellow crewmember. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana on 25 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence two exhibits and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2353Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19846/4/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2352 - IAUKEAThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 August 1982, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's seaman's license for six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of "inattention to duty". The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Chief Mate on board the United States M/V CATHLAMET under authority of the license above captioned, Appellant did on or about 0545, 21 April 1982 while said vessel was at the Mukilteo Ferry Terminal, Mukilteo, Washington, wrongfully fail to perform assigned duties on the vessel's car deck during unloading operations. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington on 22 June 23, June, 29, June, 30 June, 1 July and 2 July 1982. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2352Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/22/19845/22/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2351 - EINSMANNBy order dated 27 June 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida dismissed without prejudice a charge of negligence supported by two specifications and a charge of misconduct supported by one specification which had been served on Appellant. ISSUE The appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge. Appellant asks that the charges and specifications be dismissed with prejudice. APPEARANCE: Corlett, Killian, Hardeman, McIntosh, & Levi, P.A. by David McIntosh OPINION The first question which must be answered is whether an event has occurred which is subject to appeal. As set forth in detail below, I conclude that it has not.Appeal No. 2351Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/15/19845/15/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2350 - HINCHCLIFFEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 April 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of “conviction for a narcotic drug law violation.” The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while holder of the above captioned license, was convicted on 11 January 1983 by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland of conspiracy to import marijuana. The hearing was held at Key West, Florida, on 28 April 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence a certified copy of the Judgment of the Court, a copy of the Indictment, and an Affidavit of Service of the charge sheet. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, the testimony of two additional witnesses, and several documents. At the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. The Decision and Order revoking Appellant's license was served on 14 May 1983. Notice of Appeal was timely filed on 24 May 1983 and perfected on 1 August 1983.Appeal No. 2350Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19845/9/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2349 - CANADAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 June 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas, suspended Appellant's Ocean Operator's license and Merchant Mariner's document for one month on three months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Operator on board the M/V WANDA LOUISE under authority of the above captioned licenses and document on or about 3 April 1981, Appellant failed to properly supervise the transfer of oil within the vessel which failure resulted in the discharge of about 1,000 gallons of oil into the Calcasieu River, a navigable waterway of the United States. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas on 12 May 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced four exhibits and the testimony of one witness into evidence. In defense, Appellant offered his own testimony, the testimony of one witness and four exhibits.Appeal No. 2349Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/11/19845/11/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2348 - MANLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at HOUSTON, TEXAS revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the document above captioned, on or about 5 June 1981, Appellant was convicted of possession of marijuana by the County Court of Harris County, Texas. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 12 November 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the record of Appellant's conviction. In defense, Appellant made several motions related to the admissibility of the court records, the legal effect of the Texas conviction, and the legal adequacy of the Coast Guard proceeding.Appeal No. 2348Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/12/19841/12/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2347 - WILLIAMS, A. DThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 January 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, NY suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Qualified Member of the Engine Department (QMED) on board the SS CHESTNUT HILL under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 9 December 1982, Appellant uttered abusive language toward the Third Assistant Engineer and on or about 29 November 1982 failed to stand his assigned watch. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, PA on 12 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification alleging failure to stand his watch and not guilty to uttering abusive language to the Third Assistant Engineer. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and three exhibits. Appellant offered no evidence in defense.Appeal No. 2347Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19844/11/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2346 - WILLIAMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 May 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 12 February 1982, Appellant wrongfully and fraudulently presented to the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office, Portland, Oregon, his Merchant Mariner's Document wrongfully altered in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2197 by the addition of a "Demac" endorsement, in an attempt to obtain a duplicate document with an endorsement to which he was not entitled. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington on 11 May 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and eleven documentary exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and the specification has been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2346Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/30/19843/30/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2345 - CRAWFORDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 November 1982, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N.Y.suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 12 months, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Third Assistant Engineer on board the S.S. SANTA BARBARA under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 29 August 1982, Appellant assaulted and battered a fellow crewmember, James W. PARRISH, with a dangerous weapon, a wheel wrench. The hearing was held at New York, N.Y. on 27 October 1982. At the hearing, Appellant neither appeared nor was he represented by counsel. The Investigating Officer testified to jurisdictional facts concerning service of charges on Appellant and notice to Appellant of the date of the hearing. A plea of not guilty to the charge and specification was entered on his behalf by the Administrative Law Judge and the hearing proceeded in absentia.Appeal No. 2345Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/27/19843/27/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2344 - KOHAJDAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By Order dated October 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved that while serving as ordinary seaman on board the SS PENNY under the authority of the above captioned document, while the vessel was at the Port of Tamatave, Madagascar, Appellant did: (1) On or about 0500 on 11 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty of opening cargo hatches; (2) On or about 0500 on 16 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty of opening cargo hatches; (4) On or about 1300 and 1330 on 18 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty as gangway watch, and was discovered aft of the liverpool house out of sight of the gangway; (5) On or about 0000 to 0050 on 25 Dec 1981, fail to perform his assigned duty as gangway watch; (6) On or about 0230 and 0430 on 25 Dec 1981, fail to perform his duty as gangway watch in that he was found asleep in the crew's messroom; (8) On or about 30 Dec 1981, assault and batter with his fists the vessel's Master, and threaten to kill said Master; (9) On or about 30 Dec 1981, assault the Chief Mate by threatening to kill him.Appeal No. 2344Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/28/19843/28/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2343 - WILLIAMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 21 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's mariners document upon finding proved the charge of "possession of marijuana aboard the SS INGER." On 31 August 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from then Order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary document. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order dated 16 November 1983. Appellant's delay in filing the notice of appeal was caused by Hurricane Alicia. It will therefore be considered timely. BASIS OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge of 16 November 1983 denying a temporary document. Appellant advances no grounds for his appeal. OPINION The Administrative Law Judge's interpretation of the regulations and my Decisions on Appeal is not correct insofar as he concludes that temporary licenses or documents may not be issued following a finding that one of the offenses listed in 46 CFR 5.03-5(b) has been proved.Appeal No. 2343Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19843/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2342 - MAKRINOSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 August 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for one month, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved, alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States S/S OASIS HAWAII, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 11 March 1981, Appellant allowed his vessel to depart the port of Texas City, Texas with its load line submerged. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts, on 2 and 30 April, 28 and 29 May, 4 June, and 16 July 1981. At the hearing, appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence 14 exhibits and called four witnesses.Appeal No. 2342Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19843/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2341 - SCHUILINGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Wilmington, N.C. admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Chief Engineer on board the United States vessel SS JACKSONVILLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 8 October 1982, Appellant failed to notify the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, Baltimore, Maryland, that the main propulsion motor of the vessel was flooded, that on 8 October 1982 he allowed repairs to be made to the main motor without the cognizance of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, and that on or about 13 October 1982, Appellant failed to immediately notify the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, Wilmington, N.C., of the failure at sea of the vessel's main motor. The hearing was held at Wilmington, N.C., on 4 November 1982.Appeal No. 2341Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/6/19842/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2340 - JAFFEEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 31 January 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Almeda, California suspended Appellant's license for six months, plus six months on twelve month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator on board the United States motor vessel PILLAR POINT 3 under authority of the license above captioned, on 7 November 1982, Appellant knowingly carried passengers for hire on the PILLAR POINT 3 on a sport fishing voyage off the coast of California from Pillar Point Harbor and back to Pillar Point Harbor with the starboard engine inoperative, the starboard engine-driven bilge pump inoperative, and the starboard shaft disconnected from the reduction gear in an unsafe manner. The hearing was held at Alameda, California on 1 December 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2340Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/20/19841/20/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2339 - HOOTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.25-15. By order dated 11 December 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license for six months, on twelve months probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as a Licensed Operator aboard the P/C SEA HOOK, under the authority of the license above captioned on or about 19 July 1980, and 8, 19, 21, 23, 27 and 28 September 1981, Appellant transported passengers for hire onboard a foreign-built vessel, between Auke Bay, Alaska, and the vicinity of Point Retreat, Alaska. The hearing was held at Juneau, Alaska, on 17 November 1981. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and presented his evidence which consisted of his oral testimony. He offered neither documentary evidence, not evidence by deposition. He called no witnesses. The Investigating Officer presented the testimony of two witnesses as well as six documents.Appeal No. 2339Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/18/19841/18/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2338 - FIFER IIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 March 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that on or about 1 March 1982, Appellant was convicted of possession of cannabis (over 100 pounds) by the Circuit Court, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida on 9 December 1982 and on 20 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits. At the end of the hearing on 9 December 1982 the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea. The hearing was then continued to 20 January 1983. On that day Appellant testified, called three witnesses and introduced into evidence two exhibits all directed toward mitigation and extenuation. The Administrative Law Judge's decision and order revoking all licenses and documents issued to Appellant, dated 8 March 1983, was served on 14 March 1983. Appeal was timely filed on 17 March 1983 and perfected on 4 May 1983.Appeal No. 2338Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/6/19841/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2337 - NYBORGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California admonished Appellant. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Pilot on board the United States SS SAN MARCOS and directing the movements of said vessel under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 12 May 1981, Appellant failed to initiate adequate and timely evasive maneuvers to avoid collision with the F/V SANDRA LINN while overtaking said vessel in the vicinity of the Bay Bridge in San Francisco Bay. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California, on 28 July, 11,21,26 and 31 August 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence several documents and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2337Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/6/19841/6/198412/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2336 - SAMPSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 April 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Tampa, Florida revoked Appellant's seaman's license upon finding him guilty of incompetence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant while serving as Operator on board the United States S/V LA GRINGA, O.N. 530918, under authority of the license above captioned, did during the year 1981, operate said vessel from St. Petersburg Municipal Marina Tampa Bay, Florida, while physically incompetent because of inadequate vision. The hearing was held at Tampa, Florida, on 12 February 1982 and on 13 April 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and single specification thereunder The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits, one of which, Exhibit 1, was a stipulation of fact signed by both the Investigating Officer and the Appellant.Appeal No. 2336Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/9/198312/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2335 - PRIDGENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license and document for four months, upon finding him guilty of negligence and misconduct. The specification of the negligence charge alleges that while serving as pilot of the M/V GREAT LAKES, under authority of the license and document above captioned, on or about 9 October 1979, Appellant navigated that vessel in a negligent manner by allowing it to allide with moored construction barges at the Brightman Street Bridge, Fall River, Massachusetts. The specification of the misconduct charge alleges that while Appellant was serving as pilot he did so without a proper endorsement on his license. The Master of the vessel, Egil K. Pedersen, was also charged with negligence and misconduct. The hearing was held in joinder with that of the Master at Providence, Rhode Island on 12 October 1979, 8 November 1979, 11 December 1979 and 4 January 1980.Appeal No. 2335Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/9/198312/9/198312/20/2017
Page 8 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.