CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1577 - PORTERBy order dated 23 February 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as second assistant engineer on board the United States SS NORBERTO CAPAY under authority of the document and license above described, on or about 11 January 1966, at Manila Philippine Republic, Appellant (1) wrongfully assaulted and battered the chief mate of the vessel, (2) wrongfully assaulted and battered another crewmember, Wilder Wallace; and (3) wrongfully failed to join the vessel. At the hearing , Appellant elected to act as his own counsel, with the assistance of his wife. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and to all specifications except that alleging assault and battery upon Wilder Wallace. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence documentary evidence from the ship's articles and official log book, and the testimony of the two alleged assault victims and of the first assistant engineer of the vessel. In defense, Appellant offered unsworn statements by his wife and himself. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and all specifications had been proved. The Examiner later entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months outright plus six months on twelve months' probation, and the entire decision was served on 28 February 1966. Appeal was timely filed on 28 March 1966. Appeal was perfected by filing of a brief on 10 June 1966.Appeal No. 1577Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/18/19668/18/196612/28/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1576 - ASTRAUSKASBy order dated 22 April 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for one month outright plus two months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Carpenter on board the United States SS CANADA BEAR under authority of the license above described, on or about 20 April 1966, Appellant engaged in mutual combat with another crewmember, while under the influence of alcohol, while the vessel was at San Francisco, California. The hearing was held in joinder with that of the other crewmember, William L. Rodrigues. The single specification alleged against Rodrigues was identical with that served upon Appellant except for the substituted names. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by non-professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. Rodrigues, who was not represented by counsel, pleaded guilty. The Investigating Officer introduced on evidence extracts from the shipping articles of CANADA BEAR, and testimony of the master of the vessel. The Investigation Officer then rested, but immediately thereafter called Rodrigues as witness. Rodrigues testified and the Investigating Officer rested again. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of one month outright plus two months on twelve months' probation.Appeal No. 1576Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/12/19668/12/196612/28/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1575 - HILLIKERBy order dated 26 January 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Oregon, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 4 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Second Assistant Engineer on board the United States SS ROBIN KIRK under authority of the document and license above described, on or about 15 and 16 December 1965, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties, at Inchon, Korea, by reason of intoxication. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence entries in the Official Log Book of ROBIN KIRK. In defense, appellant made an unsworn statement. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and both specifications had been proved. The Examiner then entered an order suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of four months outright.Appeal No. 1575Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/3/19668/3/196612/28/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1574 - STEPKINSBy order dated 28 March 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at San Diego, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months on six months' probation upon finding him guilty of violation of a statute. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as master on board the United States MV AMERICAN BOY under authority of the documents above described, on or about 19 January 1966, Appellant wrongfully sailed from San Diego, California, on a fishing voyage without a licensed mate aboard the vessel as required by Title 46 U. S. Code 224a. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer entered in evidence stipulations made with Appellant and his counsel as to facts in the voyage of AMERICAN BOY. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. The Examiner then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of three months' probation.Appeal No. 1574Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/20/19667/20/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1573 - ARBOLEDABy order dated 18 February 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoke Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a Chef's Utility board the United States SS MARIPOSA under authority of the document above described, on or about 26 April 1965, Appellant assaulted and battered with a dangerous weapon on John Scribner, a crewmember, and assaulted and battered with his hands on James Potts, a passenger, and one Loraine Alaimo, another crewmember, in the port of Papeete, Tahiti. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the Official Log Book of MARIPOSA and the testimony of Scribner and Alaimo. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of another crewmember and a copy of a sworn statement he had made to a U. S. consul.Appeal No. 1573Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/26/19667/26/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1572 - BENGERTBy order dated 21 April 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months outright plus 4 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a wiper on board the United States SS DEL MUNDO under authority of the document above described, Appellant, on nine different dates between 9 March and 29 March 1961, sometimes at sea and sometimes in port, wrongfully failed to perform his duties. On three of these dates, one time at sea, it is alleged that the failure was due to intoxication. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel. appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced no evidence.Appeal No. 1572Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/26/19667/26/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1571 - CONKLINGBy order dated 26 November 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 6 months outright plus 6 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a boatswain on board the United States SS GREEN POINT under authority of the document above described, on or about 23 July 1965, Appellant wrongfully made threats against, and assaulted and battered, a fellow crewmember, one Carlos V. Contreras. This hearing was held in joinder with one involving Carlos V. Contreras, the alleged victim of Appellant's assault and battery. Contreras was also charged with assault and battery upon Appellant. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 1571Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/19/19667/19/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1570 - CANNELL & SINDABy orders dated 27 May 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, suspended Appellant Cannell's license for two months on six months' probation, and entered an admonition against Appellant Sinda upon finding them guilty of negligence and inattention to duty respectively. The specifications found proved against Appellant Cannell allege that while serving as pilot on board the United States SS TEXACO WISCONSIN under authority of the license above described, on or about 7 August 1964, Appellant negligently failed to sound a danger signal when his first two blast signal was not responded to by the approaching SS STEEL MAKER, thereby contributing to a collision with that vessel, and maneuvered the vessel for a port to port passing in a situation which dictated a starboard to starboard passing.Appeal No. 1570Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/19/19667/19/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1569 - BUNNPursuant to the order of the court, U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 20 August 1968, the Order in the captioned case is RESCINDED. The finding and order of the Examiner, dated at New York, N. Y., on 9 December 1965, are VACATED, and the charges are DISMISSED.Appeal No. 1569Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/12/19667/12/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1568 - GALLEGOSBy order dated 22 September 1965 an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Able Seaman on board the United States SS DEL VALLE under authority of the document above described, during the period from 1 July 1965 to 9 September 1965, Appellant wrongfully absented himself from his duties on or about 21 July 1965 and on or about 11 August 1965, while the vessel was in a foreign port; that on or about 22 july 1965 while the vessel was in a foreign port Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties by reason of intoxication; that on or about 8 august 1965, while the vessel was underway in a foreign harbor, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform duty as a watchstander on wheel and lookout watches. At the hearing, Appellant did not appear and was not represented by counsel. A plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification was entered. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence certified copies of log entries as to each offense charged. No evidence was offered on behalf of the Appellant.Appeal No. 1568Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/7/19667/7/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1567 - CASTROBy order dated 31 January 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for six months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a deck maintenance man on board the United States SS SANTA LUISA under authority of the document above described, on or about 22 September 1965, Appellant wrongfully had intoxicating liquor (nine bottles) in his possession at sea. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and introduced six documents.Appeal No. 1567Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/1/19667/1/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1566 - WHITEBy order dated 21 February 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, ordered Appellant's seaman documents revoked upon finding him guilty of the charge "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that while holder of the document above described, on or about 11 January 1962, Appellant was convicted in the United States District Court for the district of Oregon of violation of narcotic drug laws of the United States. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a certified copy of the judgement and commitment in the District Court proceedings. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimonyAppeal No. 1566Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1565 - JEREMICBy order dated 8 November 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, La., suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months outright finding him guilty of negligence.The specifications found proved allege that while serving as master on board the United States SS MANHATTAN under authority of the license above described, on or about 16, 18, and 19 April 1964, Appellant allowed his vessel to be navigated with draft "exceeding the maximum safe loading draft indicated by the latest verbal and charted notices of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers," thereby contributing to grounding of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence charts and other documents, and the testimony of five witnesses.Appeal No. 1565Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/23/19666/23/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1564 - KEARNEYBy order dated 13 October 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 3 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a third refrigeration engineer on board the United States SS PRESIDENT MADISON under authority, of the document above described, Appellant, during a voyage from 14 April 1965 to 13 August 1965, on 28 May 1965 wrongfully threatened the chief engineer with bodily harm; that Appellant on 25 June 1965 wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties during part of his watch; that Appellant on 11 July 1965 operated a distillery for alcoholic beverages in the reefer machine shop on board said vessel; that on 12 August 1965 Appellant wrongfully assaulted the chief officer; and that on 13 August 1965 Appellant wrongfully assaulted the chief refrigeration engineer. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professionalAppeal No. 1564Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/23/19666/23/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1563 - RONDONBy order dated 25 January 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N. Y. revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a crew messman on board the USNS TWINN FALLS under authority of the document above described, on or about 6 March 1965, Appellant assaulted and battered another crew member, Asuncion Quinones, by cutting him with a knife. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of Quinones and two other witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimonyAppeal No. 1563Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/15/19666/15/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1562 - FAULKNERBy order dated 18 February 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for three months outright plus six months on eighteen months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a third assistant engineer on board the United States SS IBERVILLE under authority of the document and license above described, Appellant 1. wrongfully failed to perform assigned duties on 25 and 26 December 1965, at Qui Nhon, Vietnam; 2. wrongfully failed to perform assigned duties on 28 January 1966, at Kunsan, Korea; and 3. on 25 December 1965, wrongfully threatened another officer of the vessel, a third assistant engineer.Appeal No. 1562Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/13/19666/13/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1561 - CONKLINBy order dated 13 December 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N. Y. revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Third Mate on board the United States SS HARBOR HILLS under authority of the documents above described, on or about 25 September 1965, Appellant: (1) wrongfully engaged in acts of sexual perversion with a member of the crew when the vessel was at Westport, Oregon, and (2) at the same time and place, used foul and abusive language to the master of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, and two letters of recommendation.Appeal No. 1561Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/7/19666/7/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1560 - BROUSSARDBy order dated 17 February 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, N. Y. suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an able bodied seaman on board the United States SS MORMACGULF under authority of the document above described, or about 29 August 1964, Appellant wrongfully sailed for a foreign port without registering as a person who had been convicted of a violation of the narcotic drug laws of the State of Texas; that on or about 26 October 1965 Appellant wrongfully entered the United States at Jacksonville, Florida, from Brazil without registering as a person who had been convicted of a violation of the narcotic drug laws of the State of Texas; that on 24 August 1964, while entitled to hold Merchant Mariner's Document Z-364980 "R" Appellant fraudently did apply for a duplicate merchant mariner's document in that he did falsely deny that he had been convicted of a violation of a narcotic drug law of the United States; and that on 17 September 1965, while entitled to hold Merchant Mariner's Document Z-364980 "R", Appellant fraudulently did apply for a duplicate merchant mariner's document in that he did falsely deny that he had been convicted of a violation of a narcotic drug law of the United States.Appeal No. 1560Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/19666/3/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1559 - BETANCOURTBy order dated 25 October 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for three months outright on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleges that while serving as a deck maintenance man on board the United States SS AFRICAN METEOR, under authority of the document above described, on or about 6 July 1965, Appellant wrongfully assaulted a fellow crewmember, Alberto V. Papa, with a knife--two other specifications of wrongful assault were found not proved. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of Alberto V. Papa, and Peter Estabrooks, the second assistantAppeal No. 1559Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/2/19666/2/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1558 - SORRENTINO.PDFBy order dated 21 February 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as third mate on board the United States SS NORBERTO CAPAY under authority of the documents above described, on or about 16 September 1965, Appellant wrongfully failed to join the vessel at Qui Nhon, Vitenam. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four documents.Appeal No. 1558Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/2/19666/2/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1557 - PEREZBy order dated 21 January 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for two months outright plus four months on eight months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a refrigeration oiler on board the United States SS CONSTITUTION under authority of the document above described, on or about 20 November 1965, Appellant assaulted and battered, by pushing, the second assistant engineer and shortly thereafter also assaulted the same person by shaking his fist at him in a threatening manner and offering to inflict bodily harm. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 1557Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/27/19665/27/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1555 - WEBBBy order dated 8 October 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 24 months' outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as an A.B. on board the United States SS FLYING GULL under authority of the document above described, on or about 12 July 1965, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter a fellow crewmember, Andrew Menice, Boatswain, by striking him about the right side and inflicting a puncture wound. Another specification alleging wrongful possession of charez (a form of marijuana) was found not proved. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 1555Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19665/23/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1554 - MCMURCHIEBy order dated 15 October 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a deck utilityman on board the United States SS SANTA LUISA under authority of the document above described, on or about 15 and 16 March 1965, Appellant, at Kingston, St. Vincent, 1) wrongfully failed to perform duties at unmooring the vessel by reason of intoxication; 2) wrongfully destroyed ship's property by throwing mooring lines overboard; 3) wrongfully assaulted and battered the master of the vessel; and 4) wrongfully used foul and abusive language to the master of the vessel. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 1554Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/16/19665/16/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1553 - BARTONBy order dated 26 October 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 3 months outright plus 3 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as and A.B. seaman on board the United States SS GIBBES LYKES under authority of the document above described, Appellant (1)wrongfully failed to perform dutiess on 26 August 1965, from 1600 to 1900; (2) wrongfully failed to join the vessel at 1900 on 26 August 1965, remaining so absent until 31 August 1965; (3) wrongfully absented himself from the vessel from 1500 on 10 September to 1815 on 11 September, 1965;Appeal No. 1553Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/18/19665/18/19663/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1525 - BRENANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 10 May 1965 at Seattle, Washington, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard, after conducting a hearing at Portland, Oregon, revoked Appellant's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The offenses alleged were proved by evidence that while serving as a fireman-watertender on board the United States SS OCEANIC SPRAY under authority of the document above described, Appellant wrongfully failed to stand his watches on 24 and 25 December 1964 as well as on 21, 24 and 25 February 1965, and 9 March 1965, while the ship was at sea or in a foreign port. Each offense is supported by a properly prepared entry in the ship's official logbook. No other evidence was introduced by the Investigating Officer and there was no evidence in defense since Appellant was not present at the hearing. On 15 April 1965, the foreign voyage was completed at Portland. On the morning of this date, Appellant was served with the charge and specification and ordered to appear for a hearing on 16 April. At this time, he voluntarily deposited his document with the Investigating Officer. Appellant was not present or represented when the hearing was convened on 16 April and nothing had been heard from him. The Examiner continued the case subject to call.Appeal No. 1525Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/12/196511/12/19653/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1524 - PAULBy order dated 7 July 1965, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's seaman documents for two months on nine months' probation upon finding her guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as a stewardess on board the United States SS ARGENTINA under authority of the document above described, on 13 May 1965, Appellant wrongfully created a disturbance. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of several eyewitnesses to the incident. The only defense witness was not present when the alleged offense occurred. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. The Examiner entered the order of suspension mentioned above.Appeal No. 1524Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/4/196511/4/19653/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1523 - MICHAELSBy order dated 23 June 1965 at Seattle, Washington, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard, after conducting a hearing at Portland, Oregon, revoked Appellant's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The charge was proved by evidence that, on 16 September 1964, Appellant was convicted by the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah, a court of record, for violating a narcotic drug law of the State of Oregon (illegal sale of marijuana). At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification at the beginnings of the hearing on 17 July 1964. The Investigating Officer introduced evidence of an indictment against Appellant for the unlawful sale of marijuana, and a jury verdict finding Appellant guilty as charged in the indictment. The Investigating Officer then rested. Counsel for Appellant moved to dismiss the charges on the ground that there was no evidence of a conviction since the court had not yet rendered judgement in the case. The Examiner agreed that the proceedings were premature but denied the motion and adjourned the hearing until after the court acted.Appeal No. 1523Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/23/19656/23/19653/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1486 - KNUTSONBy order dated 26 May 1964, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Oregon, revoked Appellant's seaman documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The five specifications found proved allege that while serving as an able seaman on the United States SS WILDERNESS under authority of the document above described, on 23 February 1964, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties as helmsman and wrongfully had possession of alcoholic beverages on the ship; from 30 March through 3 April 1964, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his assigned duties on 16 April 1964, Appellant created a disturbance on board and deserted the ship. At the original hearing, Appellant was not present or represented by counsel. The hearing was conducted in absentia after the Examiner entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and each specification on behalf of Appellant.Appeal No. 1468Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/7/19651/7/19653/1/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0350 - DARCYIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. A-25811 Issued to: CLEMENCE LEO DARCY DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 350 CLEMENCE LEO DARCY This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 19 April, 1949, and 22 April, 1949, Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, to answer a charge of misconduct based upon four specifications. These specifications allege that Appellant did, while serving as deck maintenance man on the American SS STEPHEN W. KEARNY under authority of his duly issued Certificate of Service No. A-25811: 1. On or about 2 February, 1949, while said vessel was at a foreign port, fail to return on board in reasonable time after having been released from doctor as fit for duty. 2. On or about 3 and 4 February, 1949, while serving as above, fail to perform his duties without reasonable cause. 3. On 2, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 March, 1949, while serving as above, fail to turn to at 0800 and perform his duties between the hours of 0800 and 1700 by reason of being under the influence of intoxicants all in violation of good order and discipline.Appeal No. 0350Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/30/19496/30/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0349 - VIRNETIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-20966 Issued to: ANIBAL VIRNET DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 349 ANIBAL VIRNET In The Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-20966 Issued to: ANIBAL VIRNET Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-669069 Issued to: CLARENCE DEANE MILLER Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-630431-D1 Issued to: JOHN HENRY WHEATLEY Certificate of Service No. E-61599 Issued to: MANCEL S. HAWKINS DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 349 This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 30 and 31 March, 1949, each of the above-named Appellants appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, to answer a charge of "misconduct" supported by the following specification: "In that you, while serving (in the stated individual capacity) on board a merchant vessel of the United States, the MV LUCIDOR, under authority of your duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document (or Certificate, as applicable) did, on or about 25 January, 1949, unlawfully delay the sailing of said vessel from a domestic port by reason of failure to report aboard in accordance with posted sailing orders, such being contrary to 46 U.S.C. 701."Appeal No. 0349Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/29/19499/29/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0348 - RHONEIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-757800 Issued to: RICHARD RHONE DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 348 RICHARD RHONE This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 17 May, 1949, the Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Galveston, Texas, on a charge of misconduct supported by two specifications. The first specification alleges that while Appellant was serving as utilityman on board the American SS GENERAL R. E. CALLAN under authority of his Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-757800, he had in his possession four marijuana cigarettes on or about 18 June, 1947, while in the port of New York. The second specification alleges that Appellant while serving as above, and on the same date, gave aid and comfort to a member of the crew in assisting him to land marijuana in the United States.Appeal No. 0348Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/22/19496/22/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0347 - BARIIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. E-560773 Issued to: SANTIAGO M. BARI DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 347 SANTIAGO M. BARI This appeal has been taken in conformance with 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 5 May, 1949, the Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on a charge of misconduct supported by two specifications. The first specification alleges that while Appellant was serving as galleyman on board the American SS GULFBRAND, under authority of a duly issued Certificate of Service (E-560773), he aided and assisted Manuel De Jesus Rocha, on about 12 September, 1948, in stowing away on board the vessel without the consent of the master. The second specification alleges that while still serving in the above capacity, the Appellant aided and assisted the alien Rocha, on or about 18 September, 1948, in illegally entering the United States, contrary to 8 United States Code 144.Appeal No. 0347Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/14/19496/14/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0346 - MCKINZEYIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. 521617 Issued to: JAMES McKINZEY DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 346 JAMES McKINZEY This appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 4 April, 1949, Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Mobile, Alabama, on a charge of misconduct supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as pantryman on board the American SS JOSEPH N. DINAND, under authority of his duly issued Certificate of Service No. E-521617, he assaulted a crew member, Manuel Herrera, with a dangerous weapon on or about 25 June, 1946.Appeal No. 0346Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/23/19496/23/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0345 - RAYIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-439836 Issued to: CICERO JAMES RAY DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 345 CICERO JAMES RAY This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 14 April, 1949 an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas entered an order revoking Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document Z-439836 and all other documents, certificates and/or licenses issued to him, upon finding him guilty of "misconduct" based upon two specifications alleging, first, assault and striking his superior officer on 16 August, 1947 while serving as fireman-watertender on the SS JOHN G. WHITTIER and; second, importing and bringing into the United States 270 grains of bulk marihuana on 14 July, 1948 while serving as oiler on the American SS ALMERIA LYKES.Appeal No. 0345Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/28/19496/28/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0344 - CROFTIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's License No. A-2008 Issued to: ROBERT M. MAGNUSON DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 344 ROBERT M. MAGNUSON This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 14 February, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Detroit, Michigan, entered an order suspending License No. A-2008 for a period of three months upon finding Appellant guilty of the charge of "negligence" while he was serving as Master on board the American SS HARRY W. CROFT under authority of his duly issued license. The charge is based on a specification alleging that Appellant failed to navigate the SS HARRY W. CROFT at a moderate speed during a period of low visibility, on or about 30 October, 1948, while on a voyage from Toledo, Ohio, to Indiana Harbor, Indiana, carrying approximately nine thousand tons of coal. This is a violation of Rule 15 of the laws relating to the navigation of vessels, Title 33, United States Code 272. At the hearing, the regulatory requirements with respect to Appellant's rights were complied with and Appellant was represented by counsel of his own choice. Appellant pleaded "not guilty" to the specification but at the conclusion of the hearing, the Examiner found the specification and charge "proved." After his license had been suspended, the Appellant was issued a temporary license pending determination of this appeal.Appeal No. 0344Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/8/19497/8/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0343 - JACKSONIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. BK-308991 Issued to: JOHNNIE LEE JACKSON DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 343 JOHNNIE LEE JACKSON This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. Appellant was charged with misconduct before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, based upon specifications alleging that while serving as a messman on the American SS TOWANDA VICTORY, under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document No. BK-308991, he did (1.) On or about 22 March, 1949, while said vessel was in the port of Cherbourg, France, unlawfully have in his possession, and concealed in his clothing, a bread knife with an eight inch blade which was a deadly weapon. (2.) On or about 22 March, 1949, while said vessel was in Cherbourg, France, attempt to assault the Second Officer of said vessel with a deadly weapon while under the influence of liquor. (3.) Fail, without justifiable cause, to respond to a summons served upon him by an authorized officer of the United States Coast Guard.Appeal No. 0343Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/23/19496/23/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0342 - JESUSIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-62646 Issued to: OTILIO DE JESUS DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 342 OTILLIO DE JESUS This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 6 April, 1949 Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, charged with "misconduct" for that while serving as an Able Seaman on the SS AGWISTAR under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document Z-62646, on 27 January, 1949 he unlawfully had in his possession a certain quantity of Marihuana - to wit, approximately 1 pound. Appellant was represented by counsel who also served as interpreter for Appellant and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. After hearing the report of the Investigating Officer and the argument by counsel for Appellant, the Examiner entered an ordered revoking appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document aforesaid together with all other documents or certificates now held by the Appellant.Appeal No. 0342Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/6/19496/6/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0341 - BACHILLERIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. E-654982 Issued to: RAFAEL L. BACHILLER DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 341 RAFAEL L. BACHILLER This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 21 April, 1949, Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York City on a charge of misconduct supported by two specifications. The first specification alleges that while Appellant was serving as utilityman on board the American SS AGWISTAR, under authority of his duly issued Certificate of Service No. E-654982, he unlawfully, and knowingly, combined and conspired with certain named persons, on or about 15 October, 1948, and continuously thereafter up to on or about 3 February, 1949, to violate 26 United States Code 2591(a) and 26 United States Code 2593(a). The second specification alleges that, while serving as above, Appellant, on or about 27 January, 1949, unlawfully acquired approximately one pound of marijuana without having paid the transfer tax imposed by 26 United States Code 2590(a) and thus violated 26 United States Code 2593(a). Appellant was represented at the hearing by counsel and the latter, in behalf of Appellant and with his authorization, entered a plea of "not guilty" to the first specification and a plea of "guilty" to the second specification. The Examiner received testimony from both parties in connection with the first specification. The Examiner then, having found the first specification "proved in part" and the second specification "proved by plea," entered an order revoking Certificate of Service No. E-654982 and all other valid licenses, documents and certificates held by Appellant which had been issued to him by the Coast Guard or the predecessor authority.Appeal No. 0341Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/17/19496/17/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0340 - NORMANIn The Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-531800-D2 Issued to: PHILLIP NORMAN DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 340 PHILLIP NORMAN This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 26 April, 1949 Appellant was charged before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, with "misconduct" for that while serving as "galley utility" on board a merchant vessel of the United States, the SS PHILIP BARBOUR under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document Z-531800-D2, he failed to join said vessel without reasonable cause on or about 7 April, 1949. Voluntarily waiving his right to counsel, Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge, although he admitted that he had not sailed with the vessel at the time of its departure from New Orleans. There was received in evidence an excerpt from the Shipping Articles from the SS PHILIP BARBOUR showing Appellant's name, rating and wages. Appellant explained that his reason for failing to report to his vessel was due to the fact that on the evening of the 5th of April, he had gone ashore with permission, and had a number of drinks at a nightclub; that he was returning to the ship when the New Orleans police arrested and charged him with disorderly conduct. Before the Municipal Court at New Orleans, he was sentenced to serve 20 days and to pay a fine of $20.00 on each of two charges and his incarceration prevented him from returning to the vessel.Appeal No. 0340Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/19/19496/19/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0339 - LUCIENIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. E-521498 Issued to: JAMES HARRY LUCIEN, JR. DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 339 JAMES HARRY LUCIEN, JR. This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 22 March, 1949, the Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, on a charge of misconduct supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as messman on board the American SS SULPHUR MINES, under authority of Certificate of Service No. E-521498, he unlawfully had in his possession on or about 16 February, 1949, certain narcotics known as marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant was given a full explanation of the nature of the proceedings and the possible consequences. He voluntarily waived his right to representation by counsel and pleaded "guilty" to the charge and specification. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner entered an order revoking Certificate of Service No. E-521498 and all other valid certificates of service held by the Appellant. In his appeal, Appellant states that this is his first offense of any nature and that he did not intend to sell the marijuana to others but had planned to use it himself. Appellant is twenty-one years of age.Appeal No. 0339Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/9/19496/9/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0338 - NASSERIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-35960 Issued to: JOSEPH NASSER DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 338 JOSEPH NASSER This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 17 March, 1949, the Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York on a charge of "misconduct" supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as utilityman on board the American SS PONTUS H. ROSS, under authority of a duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document (Z-35960), he unlawfully possessed and concealed, and facilitated the transportation and concealment at New York on or about 7 March, 1948, of a certain narcotic drug commonly known as heroin which weighed approximately seventeen ounces. At the hearing, the Appellant was given a full explanation of the nature of the proceedings and the possible consequences, and he was represented by counsel of his own selection. Appellant entered a plea of "guilty" to the specification. Upon completion of the hearing, the Examiner entered an order revoking said Merchant Mariner's Document and all other licenses, certificates or documents issued by the United States Coast Guard to Appellant.Appeal No. 0338Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/5/19497/5/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0337 - SULLIVANIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-413451 Issued to: WILLIAM THOMAS SULLIVAN, JR. DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 337 WILLIAM THOMAS SULLIVAN, JR. This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 4 April, 1949, the Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York on a charge of misconduct supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as ordinary seaman on board the American SS MARINE MARLIN, under authority of a duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document (Z-413451), he had in his possession, contrary to law, on or about 24 March, 1949, approximately 32 grains of a narcotic known as marijuana. Appellant voluntarily waived his right to representation by counsel and entered a plea of "guilty" to the specification. After the hearing, the Examiner found both the specification and the charge proved, and he thereupon entered an order revoking said Merchant Mariner's Document Z-413451 and all other valid licenses and certificates issued to the Appellant by the United States Coast Guard or any predecessor authority.Appeal No. 0337Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/9/19496/9/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0336 - HOLTIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-169409 Issued to: ARNOLD HOLT DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 336 ARNOLD HOLT This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 1 March, 1949, the Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York on a charge of misconduct supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as fireman-watertender on board the American SS ROCK SPRING VICTORY, under authority of a duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document (Z-169409), he had in his possession, contrary to law, on or about 12 January, 1948, a quantity of narcotics; to wit, marijuana. Appellant voluntarily waived his right to representation by counsel and entered a plea of "guilty" to the charge and specification. After the hearing, the Examiner entered an order revoking said Merchant Mariner's Document and all other valid licenses, certificates and documents held by the Appellant. Appellant indicates in his appeal that he feels his documents should not be revoked in view of the lesser punishment meted out to one George Griffith for a similar type offense. Both Appellant and George Griffith received probationary suspensions from U. S. District courts. Griffith also had his documents suspended outright for two months and was placed on probation for two years.Appeal No. 0336Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/2/19496/2/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0335 - DIPMOREIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-294959-D1 Issued to: IVORY IVY DIPMORE DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 335 IVORY IVY DIPMORE This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 21 March, 1949, Appellant was charged before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York with misconduct, for that while serving as 3rd cook on the American SS MARINE TIGER under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document Z-294959-D1, he did on or about 2 March, 1949, while said vessel was in the port of New York, unlawfully have in his possession narcotics, to wit, eleven grains of marijuana and nine grains of marijuana seed. Voluntarily waiving his right to representation by counsel, Appellant entered a plea of "guilty with an explanation" to this charge. At a hearing on 22 March, 1949, the unsworn statement of Appellant was received wherein he admitted his possession of narcotics but claimed they had been given him by a "friend" following their mutual indulgence in several drinks. The Examiner found Appellant was guilty by virtue of the plea and entered an order revoking the documents identified above and all other documents or certificates held by this Appellant.Appeal No. 0335Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/13/19496/13/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0334 - TERCEROIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-456458 Issued to: FRED EUGENE TERCERO DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT 334 FRED EUGENE TERCERO This appeal comes before me by virtue of 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 3 March, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Merchant Mariner's Document Z-456458 issued to Fred Eugene Tercero upon finding him guilty of a charge of misconduct based upon two specifications alleging that on 17 March, 1948, he unlawfully imported a quantity of marijuana without having registered and paid the tax required by law, and that he unlawfully acquired this marijuana without paying the transfer tax required by law. At the hearing, Appellant was given a full explanation of the nature of the proceedings and the possible consequences. He was advised that he was entitled to counsel, but Appellant chose to act as his own counsel. Appellant entered a plea of "not guilty" to the first specification and a plea of "guilty" to the second specification. The Investigating Officer made an opening statement concerning his investigation of the case, and took the witness stand for the purpose of identifying a certified copy of a commitment order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, dated 15 April, 1948, in the case of United States versus Fred E. Tercero.Appeal No. 0334Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/11/19495/11/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0333 - PARKERIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-433886-D1 Issued to: MORRIS PARKER DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 333 MORRIS PARKER This appeal comes before me by virtue of 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 4 April, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard entered an order revoking Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-433886-D1 and all other valid licenses and certificates issued by the Coast Guard held by Morris Parker, upon a plea of guilty to a charge of misconduct, supported by a specification alleging possession of about 12 grains of marijuana contrary to law, while serving under the authority of the document as a messman aboard the American SS AFRICAN SUN on 23 March, 1949, while that vessel was moored at Brooklyn, New York. Appellant was advised of the nature of the hearing, his right to have counsel, and of his other rights at the beginning of the hearing. Appellant, appearing as his own counsel, entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer described the results of his investigation. Appellant did not testify under oath, but stated that he had been smoking marijuana cigarettes for about two years. He made various other statements including one regarding the manner in which he obtained the marijuana which was found in his possession. No witnesses appeared. The Examiner found the charge and specification proved by plea and entered the order of revocation.Appeal No. 0333Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19495/9/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0332 - TIMASIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. A-14082 Issued to: ANTHONY L. TIMAS DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 332 ANTHONY L. TIMAS This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 3 March, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard entered an order revoking Certificate of Service No. A-14082 and all other documents issued to Anthony L. Timas upon a plea of "guilty" to a charge of misconduct, supported by a specification alleging that Anthony L. Timas unlawfully possessed, received, and facilitated transportation and concealment of approximately 212 grains of heroin while serving as an able seaman aboard the SS MARINE FALCON on 23 July, 1947, in New York, New York. At the hearing, Appellant was advised of his rights and was represented by counsel. No witnesses appeared. The Investigating Officer described the results of his investigation of the case. Counsel for Appellant made a statement in the nature of a plea that Appellant be given another chance to go to sea based on counsel's personal knowledge of Appellant's previous history and on circumstances surrounding the case. The Examiner found the charge and specification proved by the Appellant's plea and entered the order of revocation.Appeal No. 0332Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/5/19495/5/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0331 - DUKEIn the Matter of MERCHANT MARINER'S DOCUMENT Z-31679-D3 Issued to: KEOWN DUKE DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 331 KEOWN DUKE This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On March 18, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard entered an order revoking Merchant Mariner's Document Z31679-D3 and all other merchant mariner's documents issued to Keown Duke upon a plea of guilty to a charge of misconduct, supported by seven specifications alleging unfitness for duty by reason of intoxication on seventeen occasions while employed as able seaman aboard the SS WILLIAM FLOYD from September through November, 1947, while the vessel was in divers foreign ports. Appellant, acting as his own counsel, pleaded guilty to the charge of misconduct and to the seven specifications alleging his unfitness for duty by reason of intoxication. Appellant did not take the witness stand nor did he have any other witnesses appear on his behalf. The Investigating Officer described the result of his investigation of the complaint. After receiving this evidence, the Examiner found the charge and specification proved by the Appellant's plea. However, he deferred further action in order to afford the Appellant an opportunity to adduce either witnesses as to his previous good conduct or letters of recommendation attesting to the same. When he was advised that, after the passage of three days, the Appellant was unable to secure either character witnesses or letters of recommendation, the Examiner entered the order of revocation.Appeal No. 0331Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/22/19494/22/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0320 - ZEVERINOIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-521514 Issued to: NICOLO ZEVERINO DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 320 NICOLO ZEVERINO This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 4 February, 1949, this Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York on a charge of misconduct supported by a specification alleging that while he was serving as Second Electrician on board the American SS ROBIN HOOD under authority of a duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document (Z-521514) he had in his possession, contrary to law, on or about 21 January, 1949, a quantity of narcotics, to wit, 134 grains net of marijuana.Appeal No. 0320Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/11/19494/11/19499/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0319 - GRIFFINIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. E-410983 Issued to: ERNEST GRIFFIN DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 319 ERNEST GRIFFIN This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1, on appeal from an order dated 20 December, 1948, by an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, revoking the Certificate of Service No. E-410983 held by Ernest Griffin upon a plea of "guilty" to a charge of misconduct supported by one specification alleging that while Griffin was serving as a utilityman on board the American SS SANTA PAULA under authority of said certificate, he did, on or about 17 November, 1948, when said vessel was in a domestic port, unlawfully have in his possession eight marijuana cigarettes containing a total of fifty-three grains of marijuana.Appeal No. 0319Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/4/19494/4/19499/20/2017
Page 23 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.