CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2378 - CALICCHIOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 October 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for a period of six months remitted on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant while serving as Master aboard the M/V POLING BROS. NO. 7: ...while transiting out bound the CNJ Railroad Bridge in Newark Bay, NJ, did on or about 0930, 21 July 1983 negligently fail to navigate your vessel with due caution resulting in a collision between your vessel, the M/V POLING BROS. No. 7 and the Great Lakes Drill Barge No. 7 which was anchored in the East Draw of Newark Bay, NJ engaged in demolition operations. The hearing was held in New York, New York, on 13, 16 and 26 September 1983.Appeal No. 2378Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/8/19852/8/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2379 - DRUMThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 November 1983, Administrative Law Judge of the united States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for one month plus an additional two months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V DAVID ESPER under the authority of the above captioned license, Appellant did, on or about 9 May 1983, while pushing twelve loaded coal barges downbound on the Ohio River, fail to navigate his vessel so as to avoid alliding with the Big Four Railroad Bridge at approximately mile 603 on the Ohio River. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on 12 July 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2379Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/8/19852/8/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2380 - HALLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C.7702 (b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 February 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's mariner's license for two months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V LOUIS FRANK, under the authority of the above captioned license, at or about 2330, 25 April 1983, Appellant did cause his tow to allide with the Florence Highway Bridge at Mile 56.0 of the Illinois River. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on 2-3 June 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two documentary exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2380Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/8/19852/8/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2371 - MCFATEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 4 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as Assistant Engineer on board the M/V WARRIOR under authority of the above captioned documents did, on or about 16 September 1980, wrongfully assault and batter the Chief Engineer, Mr. Matthew P. Laving, with a deadly weapon, to wit, a knife, and inflicted severe bodily harm while the vessel was underway in San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 25 January 1983. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced five documents and the testimony of two witnesses into evidence. In defense, Appellant introduced his own testimony into evidence.Appeal No. 2371Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/27/19849/27/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2372 - COLLAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 CFR 5.30-15(a)(1). The hearing was held on 2 May 1984 and 7 June 1984 at Baltimore, Maryland. By order dated 7 June 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license and seaman's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification alleges that while serving as Second Mate aboard the SS CORONADO, under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 1 April 1983, Appellant did fail to perform his duty as deck watch officer by falling asleep on the wheelhouse settee while the vessel was at anchor. On 28 June 1984, the Appellant requested a temporary license and document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order dated 3 July 1984.Appeal No. 2372Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/5/198410/5/198412/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2392 - BUSINELLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 July 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license and document for one month plus an additional two months on six months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master aboard the M/V POINT CHALEUR, under authority of the captioned documents, Appellant did, on or about 4 May 1984, operate the M/V POINT CHALEUR without a licensed chief engineer on board as required by the vessel's Certificate of Inspection. The hearing was held at Corpus Christi, Texas, on 5 June 1984. At the hearing, Appellant elected to represent himself and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence his own testimony and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2392Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/13/19856/13/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2393 - STEWARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-l. By order dated 3 August l982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for two months upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as undocking master on board the M/V AL-TAHA, under authority of the captioned license on 19 January 1982, Appellant did navigate the M/V AL-TAHA aground on a charted shoal in Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. The hearing was conducted in Boston, Massachusetts, on 12 and 14 April and 3 May 1982. At the hearing Appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and eighteen exhibits.Appeal No. 2393Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/5/19857/5/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2394 - ANTUNEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 27 July 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving aboard the SS LESLIE LYKES, under authority of his document, Appellant did, on or about 21 July 1983, while the ship was moored in Houston, Texas, wrongfully have in his possession marijuana. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas, on 27 July 1983. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge concluded that the charge and specification had been proved and entered an order revoking Appellant's merchant mariner's document. The Decision and Order was served 12 September 1983. Appeal was timely filed and a copy of the transcript requested on 25 August 1983.Appeal No. 2394Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/11/19857/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2395 - LAMBERTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 8 November 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida suspended Appellant's license for six months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding prove a charge of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master on board the United State Army Dredge McFARLAND under authority of the license above captioned, on 1 May 1983, Appellant failed to ensure proper supervision of the removal of an electric hydraulic solenoid valve and failed to ensure that proper precautions were taken before allowing hotwork to be performed on the hydraulic system. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, florida, on 10 August 1983 and 23 September 1983. appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence eight exhibits and the testimony of six witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced his own testimony, that of another witness, and three exhibits.Appeal No. 2395Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/11/19857/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2396 - MCDOWELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U. S. C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 October 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's license for three months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while navigating the M/V ANANGEL SPIRIT under the authority of the license above captioned, on or about 27 November 1983 while approaching the MacArthur Lock, in the St. Marys River failed to maintain control of the M/V ANANGEL SPIRIT by allowing it to sheer into the path of the M/V INDIANA HARBOR resulting in the M/V ANANGEL SPIRIT colliding with the M/V INDIANA HARBOR. The hearing was held at St. Ignace, Michigan, on 15 December 1983. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2396Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/11/19857/11/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2397 - GEWANTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 27 March 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman's license and document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, on or about 15 January 1984, on board the M/V GOLDEN MOON wrongfully had in his possession marijuana and, at the same time and place, wrongfully had in his possession a pistol. On 10 April 1985, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary license and document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 12 April 1985.Appeal No. 2397Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/15/19857/15/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2398 - BRAZELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239g and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 March 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's document for four months upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as tankerman aboard T/B TT-7002, did on or about 24 December 1980, fail to adequately supervise cargo loading operations causing a discharge of oil into the navigable waters of the United States, the Neches, River. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 13 February 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seventeen exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses.Appeal No. 2398Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2399 - LANCASTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's license upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V PAT BREEN, under authority of his license, Appellant did, on or about 5 March 1984, while down bound on the Ohio River at approximately mile 860 fail to safely navigate said vessel and its tow resulting in the tow grounding on the left descending bank of the river. The hearing was held at Evansville, Indiana on 24 April 1984. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge concluded that the Charge and specification had been proved and entered an order suspending Appellant's merchant mariner's license. The Decision and Order was served 28 February 1985. Appeal was timely filed and a copy of the transcript requested on 21 March 1985.Appeal No. 2399Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/31/19857/31/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2400 - WIDMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 June 1984, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's license for six months and an additional six months on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V MISS HAVASUPAI, Appellant did on 12 May 1984 negligently fail to operate said vessel with due caution by failing to take prompt and clearly recognizable action to avoid a vessel that was dead in the water in the vicinity of London Bridge, Lake Havasu City and did on 3 June 1984 negligently fail to navigate said vessel with due caution by failing to take prompt and clearly recognizable action to avoid vessels restricted in their ability to maneuver in the vicinity of London Bridge, Lake Havasu City. The hearing was held at Lake Havasu City, Arizona, on 11 June 1984, and at Long Beach, California, on 26 June 1984.Appeal No. 2400Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/31/19857/31/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2401- CAVANAUGHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 31 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct and a charge of being a user of a dangerous drug. The specifications supporting these two charges allege that Appellant, while serving under authority of the captioned document on board the SS CONSTITUTION did, on or about 1900 24 February 1984 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully use cocaine and at the same time and place, being holder of the captioned document, was a user of cocaine. On 16 April 1985, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary document. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 19 April 1985.Appeal No. 2401Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2391 - STUMESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 January l984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seamen's license and document for a period of six months upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Radio Electronic Officer aboard the S/S VELMA LYKES under authority of the captioned documents, Appellant did, on or about 2 April 1983, while said vessel was in the port of Alexandria, Egypt, wrongfully assault and batter by hitting with fists the Master of said vessel. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas, on 9 November, 5 and 14 December 1983. At the hearing Appellant, although not present, was represented by professional counsel who entered a plea of not guilty on his behalf.Appeal No. 2391Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/13/19856/13/198512/7/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2427 - JEFFRIESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 29 August 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and incompetence. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications. The first alleged that, under the authority of the captioned documents aboard the SS EDGAR M. QUEENY, on or about 1 June 1985, Appellant had in his possession alcoholic beverages, to wit, beer and rum. The second misconduct specification alleged that, at the same place and time, Appellant wrongfully rendered himself unfit to stand his scheduled watch due to intoxication. The incompetence charge was supported by a single specification alleging that, while serving as Third Assistant Engineer aboard the SS EDGAR M. QUEENY under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1 June 1985, Appellant was and presently i incompetent to perform duties as third engineer due to alcoholism. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 23 July and 15 August 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the first misconduct specification, and pleas of not guilty to the second misconduct specification and the incompetence charge and specification.Appeal No. 2427Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/29/19858/29/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2428 - NEATThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 July 1958, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of "narcotics conviction." The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 12 June 1987, Appellant was convicted by the Twenty-fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana, a court of record, for knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: marijuana. A second charge, alleging misconduct, was found not proved. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 23 July 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits.Appeal No. 2428Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/7/19868/7/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2429 - ROBERTSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot aboard the Greek flag M/V VERGO, under the authority of the captioned documents, on 4 September 1984, Appellant piloted the vessel on the Delaware River from Fairless Steel Works, Trenton, New Jersey, to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, an are beyond the scope of his license. Aa second charge, alleging negligence, was found not proved and was dismissed. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 28 March, 18 April, and 8 May 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2429Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/5/19868/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2430 - BARNHARTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 12 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification supporting the charge alleges that Appellant, while serving as pumpman on board the SS LION OF CALIFORNIA, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 19 April 1985 at Berth 118, Los Angeles Harbor, wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics, to wit: marijuana. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 10 and 24 May 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence three exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2430Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/4/19868/4/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2431 - HERNANDEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 28 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's document for one month outright plus an additional two months' suspension on ten months' probation upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and inattention to duty. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as person in charge aboard T/B NMS 1906, under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1655, 27 January 1985, (1) did fail to insure that the cargo tank butterworth covers were securely shut prior to cargo transfer resulting in an oil spill into the Calcasieu River (33 CFR 156.120(e)), and (2) did transfer oil from said barge without the required oil transfer procedures. The inattention to duty specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did fail to insure both of the required fire extinguishers were in serviceable condition prior to cargo oil transfer. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 19 February 1985. At the hearing, Appellant appeared without professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence two exhibits. The Administrative Law Judge rendered a written Decision and Order on 28 February 1985. He concluded that the charge and specifications of misconduct and the charge and specification of inattention to duty had been proved and suspended Appellant's document for one month outright plus an additional two months' suspension on ten months' probation.Appeal No. 2431Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/21/19868/21/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2432 - LEONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.SC. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 18 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by three specifications which alleged that appellant, while serving as A.B. on board the S.S. STONEWALL JACKSON, on or about 1 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by being asleep on watch; on or about 3 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by not timely relieving the watch; and on or about 19 February 1985 had in his possession marijuana. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 19 March, 2 April, 24 April, 15 May, and 21 May 1985. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified on his own behalf, and introduced in evidence one exhibit and the testimony of one additional witness.Appeal No. 2432Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/4/19869/4/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2433 - BARNABYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 3 February 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charges of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation" and "misconduct." The first specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 22 December 1978, Appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois for possession of cannabis, a dangerous drug with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: marijuana. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while making application to the U.S. Coast Guard Regional Examination Center, Toledo, Ohio for renewal of his license, misrepresented the particulars of his prior record by failing to reveal a prior conviction for possession of cannabis.Appeal No. 2433Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/22/19869/22/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2434 - CORVELEYNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 7 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license for six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of Violation of Regulation. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master aboard the S.S. AMERICAN SPITFIRE, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 17 December 1985, Appellant sailed from Midway Island in the Pacific Ocean with incompatible cargo stowage in hold no. 2. The specification further alleges that certain Class X-A explosives were incompatibly stowed with certain Class VII explosives, in that the two were separated by a structure made of wood boards that did not meet the minimum requirements for a partition bulkhead, in violation of 46 CFR 146.29-51(a) and (b), the chart accompanying 46 CFR 146.29-99 and 46 CFR 146.29-100, and the definition of a partition bulkhead at 46 CFR 146.29-11(c)(36). A second specification also alleging a violation of regulation was found not proved and was dismissed by the Administrative Law Judge.Appeal No. 2434Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/1/198610/1/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2435 - BABERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 22 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 12 August 1983, Appellant was convicted by the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida for possession of cocaine, in violation of F.S. 893.03(2)(a)(4) and F.S. 893.13(1)(e). The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 22 January 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits. Appellant introduced in evidence one exhibit and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2435Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198610/14/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2436 - STAFFNEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 1 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month, remitted on three months' probation, upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, between 22 and 27 January 1985, wrongfully operated the vessel ZENOVIA carrying passengers for hire while the vessel was documented exclusively for pleasure, in violation of 46 CFR 67.45-19. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, during the same time period, wrongfully operated the ZENOVIA carrying passengers for hire while liquified petroleum gas was used, in violation of 46 CFR 25.45-1(a), 46 CFR 147.03-11 and 46 CFR 147.05-100 Table S.Appeal No. 2436Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198610/14/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2437 - SMITHThis review has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart K. By order dated 25 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Respondent's license for three months on twelve months probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Respondent, while serving as Operator aboard the M/V STEEL CHALLENGER, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 15 January 1985, failed to maintain adequate control of his vessel and tow thereby allowing the tow to allide with the Greenville Highway Bridge at Mile 531.3, Lower Mississippi River. That order was appealed. On appeal, the Vice Commandant issued an order in which he set aside the finding of the Administrative Law Judge as to the charge of negligence, vacated the order suspending Respondent's license, and remanded the case to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings. Appeal Decision 2437 (SMITH). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge reopened the hearing. The reopened hearing was held at Memphis, Tennessee, on 3 March 1987.Appeal No. 2437Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/25/198711/25/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2438 - TURNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 19 July 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for six months upon finding proved the charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence specifications found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V GULF QUEEN, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 9 March 1985 fail to sound proper whistle signals, while said vessel was at anchor in an area of restricted visibility, at or near 28°55'N and 92°52'W in the Gulf of Mexico. The misconduct specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, on or about 8 March 1985, proceed on a voyage of greater than 12 hours, without the required number of licensed operators on board, at or near 28°55'N and 92°52'W in the Gulf of Mexico. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 15 April 1985. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications.Appeal No. 2438Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/24/198611/24/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2439 - FREDERICKSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 22 September 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V NATIVE SON, on or about 26 April 1986 negligently failed to keep clear while overtaking another vessel, and negligently crossed the bow of another vessel, thus endangering the life, limb and property of the passengers and crew aboard the two vessels. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while in preparation for a trip from St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands to Tortola, British Virgin Islands, on or about 10 May 1986, failed to give a safety orientation prior to getting underway or to have placards posted as required by 46 CFR 185.25-1(d), and while acting in the same capacity on the same date failed to have on board and available for inspection his license as required by 46 CFR 185.10-1.Appeal No. 2439Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198612/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2440 - LYONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 3 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for one year outright, plus an additional three months on eighteen months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Pilot on board the M/V FEDERAL CALUMET, on or about 25 November 1985, wrongfully directed the movement of the vessel while under the influence of an intoxicant. On 13 October 1986, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary license pending approval. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 22 October 1986.Appeal No. 2440Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/198612/10/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2441 - HESTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 September 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 15 December 1983, Appellant was convicted by the State of Mississippi, Circuit Court of Jackson County, of possession of marijuana. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 25 September 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel. The Administrative Law Judge entered on Appellant's behalf an answer of denial to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits.Appeal No. 2441Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/198612/10/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2442 - ALLBRITTENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 6 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month remitted on three months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE, under the authority of the captioned document, while the vessel was towing the barge GULF FLEET 263 and navigating in conditions of fog and restricted visibility on the St. Johns River, failed to navigate the vessel with caution causing the barge to strike the Buckman Bridge. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 2 August; 5, 13 and 20 September; and 2 October 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2442Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/16/198612/16/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2443 - BRUCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 28 April 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license outright for one month, plus an additional six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE, under the authority of the captioned document, failed to properly attain and/or use available weather information prior to proceeding to sea with the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE and the tow GULF FLEET 263, contributing to the failure of the towing connection and grounding of the barge GULF FLEET 263. A second specification under the charge of negligence, alleging a failure to properly examine towing gear, was found not proved and was dismissed. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 21 and 30 January 1986.Appeal No. 2443Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/5/19871/5/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2444 - RABATSKYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 11 July 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the united States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for three months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on or about June 26, 1985, Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V JOHN M. SELVICK, under the authority of the captioned document, operated the vessel and two on Lake Michigan during a period of darkness without ensuring that the tow was equipped with adequate navigational sidelights as required by Rules 22 and 24 of the Inland Navigational Rules. The hearing was held at Chicago, Illinois on 20 March 1986. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence ten exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2444Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/10/19872/10/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2445 - MATHISONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 16 January 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for two months, remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V BELCHER PENSACOLA, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 20 July 1984, after an underwater survey and the unauthorized repair of tank barge Belcher No. 35 at Key West, Florida, wrongfully failed to make known to officials designated to enforce inspection laws, at the earliest opportunity, a marine casualty producing serious injury to said tank barge in violation of 46 USC 3315. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida. on 13 March 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2445Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19873/6/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2446 - WATSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 11 July 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for four months outright plus an additional four months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on or about September 1, 1985, Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V ETTA KELCE, under the authority of the captioned document, failed to post a proper lookout, a violation of Rule 5 of the Inland Rules of the Road, at approximately Mile 44 on the Kanawha River, West Virginia. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri on 15 April 1986. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and denied the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2446Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/19/19873/19/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2447 - HODNETTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 16 January 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for two months, remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by two specifications. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V BELCHER PENSACOLA, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 18 July 1984, wrongfully failed to give notice as soon as possible to the nearest Coast Guard Marine Safety Office of the accidental grounding of tank barge Belcher No. 35, under tow of the BELCHER PENSACOLA, as required by 46 CFR 4.05-1. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while acting in the same capacity, on or about 19 July 1984, after an underwater survey and the unauthorized repair of tank barge Belcher No. 35 at Key West, Florida, wrongfully failed to make known to officials designated to enforce inspection laws, at the earliest opportunity, a marine casualty producing serious injury to said tank barge.Appeal No. 2447Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/10/19874/10/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2448 - POWERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 29 May 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month outright, plus and additional two months remitted on nine months' probation upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and negligence. The specification under the misconduct charge alleges that while serving as Docking Pilot aboard the M/V VERGO, under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1 September 1984, Appellant piloted the vessel in Newbold Channel, Delaware River, an area beyond the scope of his license. The specification under the negligence charge alleges that, while serving in the same capacity on the same date, Appellant caused the vessel to ground in the Delaware River. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 26 March and 16 April 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2448Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19876/8/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2449 - VANRIGHTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 June 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for six months outright, plus an additional six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported buy two specifications, both of which were found proved. The first specification alleged that on or about 17 January 1986, Appellant, while serving as second assistant engineer aboard the SS OVERSEAS ALASKA, under the authority of the captioned documents, while the vessel was at sea and Appellant was on watch, wrongfully failed to obey the direct order of the first assistant engineer in that Appellant failed to leave the engine room area and go to the operating platform. The second specification alleges that Appellant, on the same date and while serving in the same capacity, wrongfully assaulted the first assistant engineer with a hammer, and assaulted and battered the first assistant engineer with his fists, resulting in injury to the first assistant engineer.Appeal No. 2449Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19876/8/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2450 - FREDERICKSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 701. By order dated 22 September 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V NATIVE SON, on or about 26 April 1986 negligently failed to keep clear while overtaking another vessel, and negligently crossed the bow of another vessel, thus endangering the life, limb and property of the passengers and crew aboard the two vessels. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while in preparation for a trip from St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands to Tortola, British Virgin Islands, on or about 10 May 1986, failed to give a safety orientation prior to getting underway or to have placards posted as required by 46 CFR 185.25-1(d), and while acting in the same capacity on the same date failed to have on board and available for inspection his license as required by 46 CFR 185.10-1.Appeal No. 2450Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/11/19876/11/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2402 - POPEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5. 30-1. By order dated 27 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's license for a period of two months plus an additional four months on eighteen month's probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while navigating the M/V CITY OF GREENVILLE under the authority of his license on or about 2 April 1983, Appellant failed to maintain proper control of his vessel and tow resulting in an allision with the Poplar Street Bridge at mile 179.2 of the Upper Mississippi River. The hearing was held at Memphis, Tennessee from 6 to 9 December 1983. At the hearing, appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2402Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/2/19858/2/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2403 - BERGERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 April 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, suspended Appellant's merchant mariner's document for one month upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Ordinary Seaman aboard the SS TYSON LYKES, on or about 22 March 1984, while said vessel was departing the port of Honolulu, Hawaii, Appellant deserted said vessel and on the same date Appellant wrongfully created a disturbance on said vessel's bridge thereby interfering with the safe navigation and undocking of the vessel while in restricted waters. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 19 April 1984. At the hearing, Appellant elected to represent himself and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence nine exhibits. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2403Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/7/19858/7/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2404 - MCALLISTERThis appeal has ben taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 17 August 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York admonished Appellant upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the Tug MARJORIE B. McALLISTER under the authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 January 1983 while the tug was pushing the loaded T/B McALLISTER 80, negligently failed to navigate with due caution resulting in the grounding of the T/B McALLISTER 80 at Diamond Reef, Hudson River, New York, resulting in a gasoline spill into the Hudson River. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on various dates between May 18, 1983 and August 15, 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2404Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/9/19859/9/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2405 - LEONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 21 May 1985, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by three specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as A.B. on board the S.S. STONEWALL JACKSON, on or about 1 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by being asleep on watch; on or about 3 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by not relieving the watch; and on or about 19 February 1985 had in his possession marijuana. On 18 June 1985, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 21 June 1985.Appeal No. 2405Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19859/6/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2406 - ZOFCHAKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702, 46 CFR 5.30-1, and 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 30 August 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Key West, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the state numbered vessel FL-1263-BH under the authority of the captioned document, Appellant did, on or about 4 March 1984, wrongfully operate said vessel under the influence of alcohol. The hearing was held at Key West, Florida, on 25 and 26 July and 30 August 1984. At the hearing, Appellant elected to represent himself, and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence nine exhibits including the depositions of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2406Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/11/19859/11/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2407 - GONSALVESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 6 April 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Honolulu, Hawaii, suspended Appellant's license for six months plus an additional six months remitted on 12 months' probation, upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification originally alleged that Appellant while serving as Chief Engineer aboard the F/V OCEAN PEARL under authority of the captioned license did on or about 21 November 1983 while said vessel was at sea negligently allow oxygen and starting fluid (ether) to be used to start the vessel's main engine which resulted in an explosion which fatally burned the Master and seriously burned six other crewmembers. At sessions of the hearing convened in Honolulu, Hawaii, on 17 and 18 January 1984, Appellant was absent but was represented by professional counsel.Appeal No. 2407Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/17/19859/17/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2408 - BROWNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 April 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's motorboat operator's license upon finding proved the charge of conviction of a dangerous drug law violation. The specification found proved alleged that while being the holder of the above captioned license, on or about 21 December 1981, Appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Monroe County, Florida, a court of record, for possession of marijuana. The Administrative Law Judge also found proved a second charge of misconduct and its supporting specification which alleged that Appellant, while serving under the authority of his license, on or about 19 August 1982, wrongfully made a fraudulent statement in his application for license renewal by answering "no" to the question: "Have you been convicted by any court - including military court - for other than a minor traffic violation?" The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 15 March 1985 and 9 April 1985.Appeal No. 2408Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/2/198510/2/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2409 - PLACZKIEWICZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702(b) and 46 CFR 5.30. By order dated 14 September 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for ten months and eighteen days upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the uninspected passenger vessel M/V DEEP SPIN, under authority of his license, on or about 26 June 1984, Appellant failed to navigate the vessel with due regard for existing conditions, while approaching a bend in the Toussaint Channel, causing the vessel to ground. The hearing was held at Toledo, Ohio, on 9 August and 12 September 1984. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. He entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2409Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/2/198510/2/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2410 - FERNANDEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 November 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Honolulu, Hawaii, suspended Appellant's license and document for three months outright plus an additional six months on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification originally alleged that while serving as third officer aboard S.S. CONSTITUTION, under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 29 September 1984. Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered by beating with fists and kicking the Chief Engineer. At the conclusion of the evidence, and subsequent to closing arguments, the Administrative Law Judge amended the specification to read that Appellant wrongfully entered into mutual combat with the Chief Engineer. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii, on 15 November 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of five witnesses.Appeal No. 2410Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/3/198510/3/198511/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2411 - SIMMONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 2 July 1984, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license for one month outright upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard the M/V AMERICAN EAGLE, under the authority of the captioned document, on 20 May 1984, while the vessel was navigating San Francisco Bay in the vicinity of the San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge, appellant failed to take adequate precautions to prevent a collision with the S/V FINE FEATHER resulting in a collision with and the sinking of that vessel. The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 2 July 1984. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses.Appeal No. 2411Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/17/198510/17/198511/30/2017
Page 17 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.