CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2255 - BASIRThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated October 10, 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months, plus 4 months on 12 months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Able Seaman on board SS DELTA BOLIVIA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 2 December 1978, Appellant failed to perform his duties because of intoxication; failed to obey direct orders of the Third Mate and of the Chief Mate; wrongfully consumed alcoholic beverages aboard DELTA BOLIVIA, and used foul and abusive language toward the Third Mate. The hearing was held on 15 February, 3 and 5 April, 11, 14, and 29 May, and 11 and 28 June 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer submitted three exhibits and the sworn testimony of four witnesses. In defense, Appellant submitted eight exhibits and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2255Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/10/19816/10/918112/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2737 - STINZIANOOn April 20, 2022, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued a Decision and Order (D&O), finding proved three charges of misconduct against the Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) of Respondent Mark Steven Stinziano. The ALJ ordered Respondent's credential suspended for four months outright, with a further suspension of eight months suspended on twelve months probation. CONCLUSION Concerning Charges 1, 2, and 6 and the allegations in Charge 5 relating to the Second Mate, the ALJ' s findings and rulings were lawful and consistent with law and precedent. He exercised his lawful discretion in assessing the credibility of the evidence presented. In view of uncertainties with respect to the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 2246(3), the case will be remanded. ORDER The ALJ's Order dated April 20, 2022, is set aside and the case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.Appeal No. 2737Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/6/20231/6/20233/14/2023
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2736 FREMENOn May 5, 2021, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued an Order of Default (OD) for Respondent Derrick Thomas Fremen's failure to attend prehearing conferences, finding proved the Coast Guard's Amended Complaint filed on February 18, 2021 (Amended Complaint) against the Merchant Mariner Credential of Respondent, and ordering the revocation of Respondent's credential. CONCLUSION The ALJ's decision to issue an Order of Default was not an abuse of discretion. The order imposed by the ALJ, revoking Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential, was not excessive. There is no reason to disturb the AU's Order.Appeal No. 2736Appeal No. 272311/22/202111/22/202112/1/2021
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2735 - ROBBFACTS At all times relevant to these proceedings, Respondent was the holder of a Merchant Mariner Credential issued to him by the United States Coast Guard. [D&O at 4, 24.] On August 31, 2018, Respondent was a crewmember of the SLNC PAX, which had been selected for random drug testing. [D&O at 4.] On August 31, 2018, Respondent provided a urine sample to a certified specimen collector. [Id.] He signed the Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form (CCF), and initialed the seals that are intended to be placed on the specimen bottles while the seals were still attached to the CCF. [Id. at 5.] The collector poured Respondent's sample into two specimen bottles and sealed the bottles in Respondent's presence. [Id.] Respondent's specimen was tested by a laboratory accredited to perform drug testing comporting with Department of Transportation (DOT) standards. The laboratory determined that Respondent's sample was positive for amphetamines at a level of 552 ng/mL and for methamphetamines at a level of 9057 ng/mL, exceeding the cut-off levels for positive tests found in DOT regulations. [D&O at 6, 25.] BASES OF APPEAL Respondent raises the following issues on appeal: I The ALJ's Ultimate Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Nos. 5 and 8 are not supported by substantial evidence. II. The ALI abused his discretion by relying upon inherently incredible testimony.Appeal No. 2735Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/17/20218/17/20218/30/2021
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2733 - SCHWIEMANOn Septernber 13, 2019, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued a Decision & Order (D&O), finding proved against Respondent Daniel Walter Schwieman one charge of violation of regulation, for carriage of more than six passengers for hire on an uninspected vessel of less than 100 gross tons, in violation of 46 CFR $ 176.100(a). The ALJ ordered Respondent's Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) suspended for one month outright, on six months probation. The Coast Guard appeals. The vessel ALLORA is a vessel of 20 gross tons and is owned by Offshore,LLC ("Offshore"). [D&O at 5; CG Ex. 5, 6.] On June 16, 20T8, the vessel ALLORA did not have a Certificate of Inspection (COf. [D&O at5,Tr. at69.] Ms. M. Nichols ("the charterer") entered into a charter agreement with Offshore, for use of the ALLORA on June 16,2018. [D&O at 5; CG Ex. 3 at 52-55; Tr. at 159-161.] The charter agreement required the charterer to only use a "qualified operator and crew," and included a "weather policy'' that reserved Offshore's right to cancel or delay the charter in the event of dangerous weather conditions, "even if you and the captain believe they are safe." [CG Ex. 5 at 52-53.1 The charterer paid $ 1,200 for use of the vessel. [D&O at 5; Tr. at 66, 16l.] On June 16,2018, Respondent operated the ALLORA, as master, on the waters of Lake Michigan, with the charterer and eleven passengers on board. [D&O at 5; Tr. at65-69,160; CG Ex. 3 at 49-57.1 Lake Michigan is a navigable water of the United States. [D&O at 5.] CONCLUSION The ALJ's ultimate findings and conclusions were neither erroneous nor an abuse of discretion. His decision complies with 33 CFR $ 20902, and he exercised his lawful discretion in assessing the credibility of the evidence presented.Appeal No. 2733Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/20/202011/20/202011/24/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2732 - CAMPOn April 16, 2019, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard dismissed the Coast Guard's complaint against Respondent Christopher Joseph Camp, in a bench ruling. The complaint alleged two counts of misconduct, for refusing to submit to a drug test required by 46 CFR Part 16 and required by company policy. The Coast Guard appeals. On June 29, 2018, the Coast Guard filed a Complaint charging Respondent with two counts of misconduct. The first count charged Respondent with refusing to submit to a drug test required by 46 CFR Part 16 by failing to remain at the collection site until the testing process was complete. The second count charged Respondent with violation of his employer's company policy, requiring compliance with drug testing procedures, by failing to remain at the collection site until the testing process was complete. Both charges were based on an April 24, 2018, random drug test in Morgan City, Louisiana.Appeal No. 2732Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/10/202011/10/202011/17/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2731 - MCLINCommandant Decision on Appeal, denying the Coast Guard's appeal, and affirming the ALJ's decision and order finding proved charges of misconduct and dangerous drug use, and revoking Respondent's MMC.Appeal No. 2731Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/23/20207/23/20208/7/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2730 - BLAKECommandant Decision on Appeal, denying the Coast Guard's appeal, and affirming the ALJ's decision and order finding proved both charges, for violation of law and misconduct, for possession of a handgun onboard a documented vessel, with order of 12-month outright suspensionAppeal No. 2730Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/17/20207/17/20208/7/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2729 - COOKThe Coast Guard complaint charged Respondent with use of a dangerous drug, based upon a positive result in a government-mandated random drug test. The D&O found the charge proved and revocation appropriate, and directed Respondent to surrender his credential. However, because Respondent had already made substantial progress toward cure, the D&O provided for a future hearing to evaluate Respondent's evidence of cure. Respondent filed a notice of appeal from the D&O. On April 17, 2019, the ALJ issued a Cure Order, finding Respondent had demonstrated cure from the use of a dangerous drug by completion of a drug rehabilitation program and demonstration of twelve months of non-association. The Cure Order directed the return of Respondent's credential, and converted the period of revocation served to a period of outright suspension. The Coast Guard appealed. Both Respondent's appeal from the D&O and the Coast Guard's appeal from the Cure Order are now ripe for decision. The ALJ's findings and decision were lawful, based on correct interpretation of the law, and supported by the evidence. The Decision and Order's finding of proved as to a charge of drug use against Respondent was consistent with applicable law and public policy, and the mandatory sanction of revocation was properly ordered. The Cure Order's finding of cure, and conversion of the order of revocation into one of outright suspension was justified. No further action against Respondent's credential is warranted in these circumstances.Appeal No. 2729Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/6/20207/6/20207/17/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2727 - BOUDREAUX IIOn October 18, 2018, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued findings and conclusions from the bench, finding the Coast Guard's Complaint against the Merchant Mariner Credential of Respondent Robert Ryan Boudreaux proved, and ordering the suspension of Respondent's credential for 90 days, with a further suspension of six months suspended on nine months probation. That Coast Guard Complaint alleged misconduct in that Respondent served aboard a vessel under the authority of his credential from October 25 to November 13 , 2017, in violation of an ALJ order suspending that credential. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY At all times relevant to these proceedings, Respondent was the holder of a Merchant Mariner Credential issued by the United States Coast Guard (MMC). On October 18,2016, the Coast Guard filed a Complaint against Respondent's MMC alleging that Respondent had committed an act of misconduct by failing to comply with his marine employer's drug and alcohol policy. See Appeal Decision 2723 (BOUDREAUX Ð (2019) at 3, 2019 WL 8137712 at 2. That Complaint was assigned Coast Guard ALJ docket number 2016-0332. The hearing in that matter was convened by ALJ Bruce T. Smith on July 11,2017. At the conclusion of the hearing, the ALJ retuned Respondent's MMC to his possession, with the understanding that this allowed Respondent to continue working under the authority of his credential, pending decision in his case. [Respondent Ex. 3 (CG-ALJ 2016-0332Tr. Vol. II at 226-28).1Appeal No. 2727Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/28/20204/28/20205/20/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2726 - BADUABy an Order dated October 17,2A19, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard denied as untimely what he construed to be Respondent Mr. Jeffrey John Badua, Jr.'s request for a hearing on the Coast Guard's Notice of Failure to Complete Settlement Agreement (Respondent's request was captioned "Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement"). Respondent appeals. At all relevant times, Respondent held a Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) issued by the United States Coast Guard. On February 27,2018, Respondent took a required preemployment drug test, pursuant to 46 CFR Part 16. The urine sample provided by Respondent tested positive for hydromorphone. Respondent maintains that the positive result was the result of a one-time, inadvertent use of another person's prescription medication. The Coast Guard issued its Complaint against Respondent's MMC on April 13, 2018, for use of a dangerous drug, in violation of 46 USC § 7704(c). On April 30,2018, the Coast Guard and Respondent entered into a Settlement Agreement. By signing the Settlement Agreement, Respondent admitted the jurisdictional and factual allegations of the Coast Guard Complaint. The Settlement Agreement provided that Respondent's MMC was revoked, but that the revocation would be stayed in order to allow Respondent to complete the elements of "cure" from use or addiction to use of a dangerous drug. See 46 U.S.C. § 7704;33 CFR § 20.502;46 CFR § 5.901(d); Appeal Decision 2535 (SWEENEY), 1992 WL I 2008768.Appeal No. 2726Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/27/20204/27/20205/20/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2728 - DILLONOn September 6, 2018, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued findings and conclusions from the bench, finding the Coast Guard's Complaint against the Merchant Mariner Credential of Respondent Michael John Dillon proved, and ordering the revocation of Respondent's credential. The Coast Guard complaint charged Respondent with use of a dangerous drug, based upon a positive result in a government-mandated periodic drug test. Respondent appeals. FACTS At all times relevant to these proceedings, Respondent was the holder of a Merchant Mariner Credential issued to him by the United States Coast Guard. [CG Ex. 1]. On January 29,2018, Respondent submitted to a government -mandated periodic urine drug test, pursuant to an application for raise-in-grade of his credential. [Tr. Vol. II at 144.] Pursuant to regulation, the sample provided by Respondent was a "split sample": the urine sample was divided by the collector into two separate specimen containers-the primary specimen and the split specimen. [Tr. Vol. I at34-35,86-90.] Respondent signed a Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form (DTCCF) for provision of his urine specimen. [Tr. Vol II at 144.1 Respondent's primary urine specimen was tested on January 30 by Alere Toxicology. That test retuned a positive result for marijuana metabolites. [Tr. Vol. II at 144.) Results of the test were forwarded to a medical review officer (MRO). [id.]Appeal No. 2728Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/8/20204/8/20206/2/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2725 - JORYOn December 5, 2008, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued a Decision and Order (D&O) revoking the Merchant Mariner credentials of Respondent Jack Anthony Jory upon finding that Respondent posed a security risk and a threat to the safety of a marine vessel, a basis for suspension or revocation of a credential under 46 U.S.C. $ 7703(5). The factual allegation supporting the Coast Guard's Complaint alleged that on November 3,2008, Respondent threatened the life of the Master of the MA/ SEA FOX (O.N 551454). Respondent appealed the D&O. Respondent's appeal was rejected and the D&O was affirmed via Commandant Decision on Appeal dated December 22,2010 (Appeal Decision 2691 (JORY), 2010 WL s79033s). On June 30,2015, Respondent mailed a "Petition to Reopen," which was received at the Docketing Center on July 9,2015. On July 16,2015, the ALJ issued an Order Denying Respondent's Motion to Reopen. On July 28,2015, Respondent filed a Motion to Reconsider. The ALJ denied this request via an Order dated July 31,2015. Respondent now appeals the denial of his petition to reopen. In brief, Respondent, while serving aboard M/V SEA FOX on November 3, 2008, told the Master of M/V SEA FOX, "I will kill you." In events leading up to the statement, Respondent lunged at the Master while trying to grab a paper out of the Master's hand and struck the Master's hand, knocking a pen to the floor. In his findings, the ALJ characterized that action as an assault. On appeal, Respondent contended that no assault occurred, and also that it was improper to find an assault since he was not charged with assault. The appeal decision rejected both contentions. Respondent also contended that the ALJ erred in failing to grant a subpoena at issue on appeal had been made more than a month after the record was closed and the D&O was issued. Accordingly, the contention concerning the subpoena, too, was rejected.Appeal No. 2725Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/8/20203/8/20204/30/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2724 - EDENSTROMThe Coast Guard complaint charged Respondent with two allegations of misconduct. First, the complaint alleged that Respondent failed to disclose a number of medical conditions on the Form CG-719K he submitted to the Coast Guard, in support of an application for renewal of his credential. Second, the complaint alleged that Respondent committed misconduct by failing to appear for a mandated random drug test on October 8, 2015. Respondent appeals. FACTS On April 2I,2015, Respondent submitted Form CG-719K, Merchant Mariner Medical Evaluation Report, dated March 27,2015, to the National Maritime Center (NMC), in support of his application for renewal of his merchant mariner credential. [CG Exs. 6 &,7; D&O at 3.] Section I of the Form CG-719K requires the applicant mariner to attest, subject to prosecution under 18 U.S.C. $ 1001, that the information provided is truthful and complete, without knowing omission. Respondent signed, and so attested. [CG Ex. 7 at3.] Section IV of the Form CG-719K, Certification of Medical Conditions, lists 88 medical conditions. As the form states at the top of Section IV, it "must be completed by applicant, and reviewed by verifying medical practitioner." The instructions to that section provide, "Applicants must report their relevant medical conditions to the best of their knowledge, and the verifying medical practitioner must verify the medical conditions, using the table below." Respondent's March 2015 Form CG-719K indicates that Respondent did not report any diagnosis or treatment of any of the 88 listed medical conditions. ICG Ex. 7 at 5; D&O at 3.] The NMC issued Respondent's renewed credential, which is the credential at issue in this proceeding, on May 8,2015. [CG Ex. l; D&O at 3.]Appeal No. 2724Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/18/20202/18/20204/30/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2723 - BOUDREAUXThe Coast Guard Complaint charged Respondent with one allegation of misconduct. The complaint alleged that Respondent committed misconduct by violating the drug and alcohol policy of his maritime employer, in refusing to submit to company-mandated random alcohol testing on April 9, 2016. The D&O added, by amendment to conform to proof, violation of a Master's lawful order as an additional element of the charged misconduct, and found the charge proved, as to violation of both a company policy and a Master's order. The ordered sanction was a sixty-day suspension of Respondent's credential. Respondent appeals. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY At all times relevant to these proceedings, Respondent was the holder of a Merchant Mariner Credential issued to him by the United States Coast Guard and was employed as an able seaman by OSG Ship Management (OSG), aboard the MN OVERSEAS LONG BEACH. [D&O at 3.] Respondent's service on the OVERSEAS LONG BEACH was under the authority of his credential.Appeal No. 2723Organization: Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/30/201912/30/20192/18/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2722 - BADUAFACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY At all relevant times, Respondent held a Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) issued by the United States Coast Guard. On February 27,2018, Respondent took a required preemployment drug test, pursuant to 46 CFR Part 16. The urine sample provided by Respondent tested positive for hydromorphone. Respondent maintains that the positive result was the result of a one-time, inadvertent use of another person's prescription medication. The Coast Guard issued its Complaint against Respondent's MMC on April 13, 2018. On April 30, 2018, the Coast Guard and Respondent entered into a Settlement Agreement, and on May 7 , the Coast Guard filed a motion for approval of that agreement. On May 8, 2018, a Coast Guard ALJ issued a Consent Order approving the terms of the Settlement Agreement.Appeal No. 2722Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/21/201910/21/201911/5/2019
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2721 TOWNSENDOn May 21,2018, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard issued an Order of Dismissal rü/ith Prejudice, Order Denying Motion for Continuance, Order Disapproving Settlement Agreement (ALJ Orders), finding that the Coast Guard lacked jurisdiction to maintain its suspension and revocation action against the Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) of Respondent James Townsend after the National Maritime Center denied his request to renew his MMC, imposing a one-year assessment period from the date of Respondent's conviction for battery, and following the subsequent expiration of Respondent's MMC. The Coast Guard appeals. I will grant the appeal because the ALJ erred in finding a lack ofjurisdiction. BACKGROUND Respondent was the holder of an MMC issued to him by the United States Coast Guard, which had been renewed on April 18,2012. [ALJ Orders at 4r] Typically, an MMC is issued for five years, and Respondent's MMC would have been expired on April 19,2017. [Tr. at l0-11] In this case, Respondent's MMC expired on September 30,2017, because of a nation-wide automatic extension applicable to all credentials expiring after December 1,2016. lld. at l0; Tr. at l9; Coast Guard ComplaintAppeal No. 2721Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/27/201812/27/20182/6/2019
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2720 ARGASTOn July 7,2016, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard issued a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") finding proved the Coast Guard's Complaint against the Merchant Mariner Credential of Respondent, Mr. Daniel James Argast, and ordering the revocation of his Merchant Mariner Credential. The Coast Guard Complaint charged use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs, specifically alleging that Respondent submitted to a drug test, and that the specimen he provided tested positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites. Respondent appeals. FACTS At all times relevant to these proceedings, Respondent was the holder of a Merchant Mariner Credential issued to him by the United States Coast Guard. [D&O at 6] Respondent has been employed as a "Civilian Mariner" employee of Military Sealift Command (hereinafter "MSC"), an agency of the United States Navy, since August3,20l2. lD&O at 6] MSC has a Memorandum of Agreement with the United States Coast Guard whereby the Coast Guard recognizes that Civilian Mariners are subject to the Navy's Drug Free V/orþlace Program. [Id.] The chemical drug testing procedures used by MSC differ from the requirements of 46 C.F.R. Part 16 and the procedures set forth at 49 C.F.R.Part 40, which apply to civilian merchant mariners in general. [1d.] Under the Memorandum of Agreement, MSC is authorized to use alternative testing procedures. lld.l Consistent with this agreement, MSC conducts its drug testing program under the technical guidelines for drug testing provided by the Department of Health and Human Services (hereinafter "HHS"). [1d.]Appeal No. 2720Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/5/201811/5/20182/6/2019
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2719 - VOELCKERSBy a Decision and Order (D&O) dated August 29,2016, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the United States Coast Guard suspended the Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) of Mr. Neil Alan Voelckers, Respondent, for thirty days upon finding proved à single allegation of misconduct. The allegation found proved alleges that on multiple occasions from May 2013 to September 2015, while holding an MMC endorsed for service as a Master of Steam, Motor or Auxiliary Sail Vessels of not more than I00 gross registered tons, Respondent served as Master of the 198-gross-ton SEA RANGER, including when the SEA RANGER was moored in the Bay of Pillars carrying passengers for hire, in violation of 46 C.F.R. $ i 5.905(b).Appeal No. 2719Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/13/20188/13/201811/7/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2718 LEWISOn April 11, 2016, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard revoked Merchant Mariner Credential of Respondent, Mr. Kevin Gerod Lewis, upon finding proved a charge of use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs. The ALJ' s bench decision was followed by the issuance of a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated April 14, 2016. The Coast Guard Complaint alleged that Respondent submitted to a non-DOT drug test on June 26, 2015, and that the specimen he provided subsequently tested positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites. Respondent appeals.Appeal No. 2718Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/6/20184/6/20184/16/2018
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2717 - CHESBROUGH IIIBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated July 26, 2016, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard revoked the Merchant Mariner Credential of Mr. Richard Albert Chesbrough, the Respondent, upon finding proved two specifications of misconduct and one specification of conviction of an offense that would preclude issuance of a Coast Guard MMC. The misconduct allegations found proved were those set forth in Allegation Number Two (making a false statement in a casualty investigation) and Allegation Number Three (attempting to induce a witness to testify falsely in connection with a marine casualty) of the Complaint. Allegation Number Six of the Complaint (conviction of an offense that would prevent the issuance or renewal ofa MMC) was also found proved. FACTS At all relevant times, Respondent was the holder of a Merchant Mariner Credential issued to him by the United States Coast Guard. The MN WILLAMETTE QUEEN is a fiberglass-hulled stemwheeler constructed in 1990. [D&O at 3; Tr. Vol. Ip. 22] WILLAMETTE QUEEN's length is 87 feet overall; its hull and engine comprise 65 feet of that distance while the stemwheel and its protective girder make up the remainder. [D&O at 3; Tr. Vol. I at 22, 30]. The vessel has a draft of three feet. [D&O at 3; Tr. Vol. I at 25]Appeal No. 2717Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/27/201712/27/201712/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2716 - CHESBROUGH temp, licenseAPPEARANCES For the Government: LCDR Benjamin M. Robinson Coast Guard Sector Columbia River Respondent: Mr. Richard Albert Chesbrough, pro se Administrative Law Judge: George J. Jordan This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. On July 26, 2016, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard issued a Decision and Order revoking the Merchant Mariner Credentials of Mr. Richard A. Chesbrough (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved two specifications of misconduct, and one specification of conviction of an offense that would preclude issuance of : " a Coast Guard MMC. On July 22, 2016, Respondent filed a Notice of Appeal in the matter. He perfected his appeal by filing an Appellate Brief on August 30, 2016. In a letter dated August 3 0, 2016, Respondent requested issuance of a Temporary Mariner Credential as appellate action commenced in his case. The ALJ considered Respondent's request and, on October 13, 2016, issued a Decision and Order denying issuance of a temporary credential to Respondent. Via letter dated October 29, 2016, Respondent attacks the ALJ's denial of a temporary credential, among other things, and requests that his credential be returned to him while he waits for the outcome of his case. I am treating this as an appeal of the ALJ's denial of his request for a temporary credential. The ALJ's decision on the temporary credential refers to all tlu·ee of the allegations found proved: Allegations Two (misconduct: making a false statement in a casualty investigation), Three (misconduct: attempting to induce a witness to testify falsely in a marine casualty investigation), and Six (conviction of an offense that would prevent the issuance or renewal of a MMC).Appeal No. 2716Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/23/20173/23/201710/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2715 - SOLOMONAPPEARANCES For the Government: CWO Dan Sammons, USCG LT John D. Nee, USCG Senior Investigating Officer Mark Gibbs For Respondent: Graham W. Syfert, Esq. Administrative Law Judge: Dean C. Metry This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated May 15, 2013, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard (hereinafter "ALJ") suspended the Merchant Mariner Document of Ms. Simone Joyce Solomon (hereinafter "Respondent") for fourteen months upon finding proved one charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that on July 2, 2012, Respondent, while serving as a crewmember aboard the vessel ALLIANCE CHARLESTON, refused a chemical test, in violation of 49 C.F.R. § 40.191(b), by submitting what according to 49 C.F.R. § 40.93(b) was a substituted urine specimen. Respondent subsequently appealed the D&O to the Commandant, United States Coast Guard, who affirmed the D&O. Respondent then appealed to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). In Zukunft v. Solomon, NTSB Order No. EM-213 (March 24, 2016), the NTSB remanded the matter for further examination of salient issues. The parties now advise that they have reached a tentative settlement agreement, and request that the matter be remanded to the ALJ to allow the agreement to be effected.Appeal No. 2715Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/3/201610/3/201610/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2714 - EAJA DAVISAPPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES FROM THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD APPEARANCES For the Government: Mr. Brian C. Crockett, Esq. Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Applicant: Mr. Brian McEwing, Esq. Reeves McEwing, LLP Administrative Law Judge: Walter J. Brudzinski This appeal is taken in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 504 and 49 C.F.R. Part 6. By order dated June 5, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard denied the application for attorney's fees and expenses of Clint Walker Davis, Jr. ("Applicant"), incurred as a result of defending himself at a Suspension and Revocationproceeding ("S&R proceeding") against a charge of use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs brought by the Coast Guard against his merchant mariner credential. In its Complaint, the Coast Guard alleged that Applicant, an active-duty Coast Guard member, also the holder of a Coast Guard-issued merchant mariner credential, submitted to a Coast Guard-mandated random drug test on January 11, 2012. The urine sample allegedly provided by Applicant subsequently tested positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites.Appeal No. 2714Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/26/20162/26/201610/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2712 - MORRISAPPEARANCES For the Government: LCDR Maureen D. Johnson, USCG Mr. John J. Hulslander Coast Guard Sector Buffalo For Respondent: Mrs. Ana Magdalena Morris, as Representative Administrative Law Judge: Michael J. Devine This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated March 7, 2013, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard dismissed the Complaint against the Merchant Mariner Document of Mr. Kwame Rey Morris (hereinafter "Respondent"). The Coast Guard Complaint charged use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs, specifically alleging that Respondent submitted to a random drug test, and that the specimen he provided tested positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites. Upon determining that the Coast Guard failed to provide substantial evidence that Respondent's positive drug test met all the elements of a prima facie case, the ALJ found the charge not proved and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.Appeal No. 2712Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/5/20161/5/201610/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2713 - SCOTOAPPEARANCES For the Government: Mr. Gary F. Ball, Esq. Mr. James P. Fink Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Respondent: Mr. Terrence S. Cox, Esq. Courtney M. Crawford, Esq. Cox, Wooten, Griffen, Hanson & Poulos, LLP Administrative Law Judge: Parlen L. McKenna This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and 33 C.F .R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated November 7, 2011, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard ordered the suspension of Respondent's Coast Guard-issued Merchant Mariner License for one month upon finding proved one allegation of misconduct. The Coast Guard properly appealed. I have learned that Respondent passed away following the filing of the Coast Guard's appeal. Past Commandant's Decisions on Appeal have held that when a Respondent dies during the pendency of his appeal, the ALJ's order should be vacated and the Coast Guard's Complaint against his mariner credential should be dismissed. Appeal Decision 2684 (SCARBOUGH) (2009);Appeal Decision 2134 (JOHNSON) (1978) (citing Melrose Distillers, Inc. v. United States, 359 U.S. 271, 272 (1959)). This result mirrors the custom in Federal practice to abate the proceeding ab initio when the defendant dies. "The only fair and reasonable disposition [of the pending litigation when a Respondent dies] is to wipe the slate clean" by dismissing the matter. JOHNSON at 3. This case is distinguishable from the two precedents cited in that the Government rather than the Respondent has lodged the appeal. The result should, nonetheless, remain the same. See DiOrio v. Nicholson, 216 Fed.Appx. 974 (2007) (when the Government appealed a veteran's benefit decision and the veteran died during the pendency of that appeal, the decision was vacated).Appeal No. 2713Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/5/20161/5/201610/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2711 - TROSCLAIRAPPEARANCES For the Government: Bruce L. Davies, Esq. CWO James R. Mints, USCG Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur For the Respondent: Christopher H. Riviere, Esq. William N. Abel, Esq. Law Office of Christopher H. Riviere Administrative Law Judge: Bruce Tucker Smith This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated April 23, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard revoked the Merchant Mariner Credential of Mr. Byron Anthony Trosclair (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved two specifications of negligence and one specification of misconduct. The first negligence specification alleges that Respondent, while acting under the authority of his Coast Guard-issued license as Master of the STARFLEET PATRIOT, was negligent in that he failed to ensure that the STARFLEET PA TRI OT was positioned close enough to the platform that was the destination of his passengers to ensure the safe swing rope transfers of the passengers, and intentionally made the swing rope transfers more difficult than necessary in order to provide "training" for the passengers that were transferring from the ST ARFLEET PATRIOT to the platform. The second negligence specification alleges that Respondent, while in the same capacity, was negligent in that he failed to have the vessel's rescue ladder/platform in a ready position during passenger transfers from the ST ARFLEET PA TRI OT to the work platform, and failed to provide any rescue assistance to a passenger who had fallen overboard while attempting to swing from the vessel to the platform. The misconduct specification alleges that Respondent, while in the same capacity, violated 46 U.S.C. § 2303 by wrongfully failing to render assistance to an overboard passenger after a marine casualty.Appeal No. 2711Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/1/201512/1/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2710 - HOPPERAPPEARANCES For the Government: Gary F. Ball, Esq. LT Takila S. Powell, USCG For Respondent: William B. Hidalgo, Esq. Administrative Law Judge: Bruce Tucker Smith This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter “D&O”) dated September 10, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter “ALJ”) of the United States Coast Guard dismissed with prejudice the Coast Guard’s Complaint seeking revocation of the Merchant Mariner Credential of Mr. Nelson Greg Hopper (hereinafter “Respondent”). The Complaint charged Respondent with use of, or addiction to the use of, dangerous drugs. The Complaint alleged that Respondent participated in a random drug test and his samples tested positive for cocaine metabolites. The ALJ found that the Coast Guard had failed to establish a prima facie case because it did not prove that Respondent had been ordered to test in accordance with 46 C.F.R. Part 16. Although the record shows that the service agent for Respondent’s employer used a computer-based random number generator to produce a list of vessels for drug testing, which included the vessel in which Respondent served, the ALJ found that the Coast Guard had failed to prove that the selection was random because it did not establish that the selection was made by a scientifically valid method.Appeal No. 2710Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/13/201510/13/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2709 - COFFYAPPEARANCES For the Government: LT Gregory J. Knoll, USCG LT Jessica L. Bohn, USCG LT Eric L. Sumpter, USCG Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads Respondent: Mr. William Tee Coffy, pro se Administrative Law Judge: Michael J. Devine This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated January 7, 2013, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard revoked the Merchant Mariner Credential of Mr. William Tee Coffy (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved one specification of use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs. The specification found proved alleges that Respondent submitted to a random drug test on May 3, 2012, and that the specimen that he provided subsequently tested positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites.Appeal No. 2709Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/20156/3/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2708 - SOLOMONAPPEARANCES For the Government: CWO Dan Sammons, USCG LT John D. Nee, USCG Senior Investigating Officer Mark Gibbs For Respondent: Graham W. Syfert, Esq. Administrative Law Judge: Dean C. Metry This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated May 15, 20 ~ 3, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") of the United States Coast Guard suspended the Merchant Mariner Document of Ms. Simone Joyce Solomon (hereinafter "Respondent") for fourteen months upon finding proved one charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on July 2, 2012, Respondent, while serving as a crewmember aboard the vessel ALLIANCE CHARLESTON, refused a chemical test, in violation of 49 C.F .R. § 40.191 (b ), by submitting what according to 49 C.F.R. § 40.93(b) was a substituted specimen.Appeal No. 2708Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/18/20155/18/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2706 - CHESBROUGHAPPEARANCES For the Government: LT Kimberly D. Rule, USCG Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Portland Respondent Pro se Administrative Law Judge: George J. Jordan This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated July 25, 2012, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") of the United States Coast Guard suspended the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Richard Albert Chesbrough (hereinafter "Respondent") for two months outright and ordered a further two months suspension on eighteen months probation upon finding proved one specification of misconduct and one specification of negligence. The misconduct specification alleges that on April 12, 2011, Respondent, while acting under the authority of his Coast Guard-issued mariner license, committed misconduct by navigating the vessel WILLAMETTE QUEEN from the Willamette Slough into the Willamette River in violation of the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, which limited operation of the vessel to the Willamette Slough when the river gauge at Salem reads 11 feet or more, as it did on the relevant date. The negligence specification alleges the same facts and further alleges that Respondent acted negligently by failing to check the river gauge at Salem to ascertain the river's stage, by operating the vessel outside the conditions of its Certificate of Inspection, and by grounding the vessel at Mile 85 on the Willamette River.Appeal No. 2706Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/23/20151/23/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2707 - CHESBROUGH IIAPPEARANCES For the Government: LT Kimberly D. Rule, USCG CWO John Nay, USCG Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Portland For the Respondent: Mr. Richard Albert Chesbrough Co-Representative: Mr. Scott Clifford Vancouver, Washington Administrative Law Judge: George J. Jordan This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated September 18, 2013, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard suspended the Merchant Mariner Credential of Mr. Richard Albert Chesbrough (hereinafter "Respondent") for two months upon finding proved one specification of misconduct. The misconduct specification alleges that on May 9, 2012, Respondent, while acting under the authority of his Coast Guard-issued mariner license, committed misconduct by navigating the vessel WILLAMETTE QUEEN from the Willamette Slough into the Willamette River in violation of the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, which limited operation of the vessel to the Willamette Slough when the river gauge at Salem reads 11 ft or more, as it did on the relevant date.Appeal No. 2707Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/23/20151/23/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2705 - PLENDERAPPEARANCES For the Government: Mr. Gary F. Ball VICE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL NO. • 27 0 5 Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Respondent: William Hewig III, Esq. Kopelman and Paige, P.C. Administrative Law Judge: Walter J. Brudzinski This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701, et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F .R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated September 17, 2012, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard revoked the Merchant Mariner Credentials issued to Mr. Kirk C. Plender (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved one charge of incompetence. The specification found proved alleges the following. Respondent submitted a completed Merchant Mariner Physical Examination Report (Form CG-719K) to the Coast Guard on February 18, 2010. His Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (hereinafter "ICD") and underlying cardiac conditions documented in the Form CG-719K rendered him physically incompetent and unfit for merchant mariner duties. The Coast Guard National Maritime Center (hereinafter ''NMC"), on March 22, 2010, informed Respondent that he was not medically fit for merchant mariner duties due to the heart condition and ICD. Thereafter, on multiple occasions between March 22, 2010, and November 21, 2011, Respondent served onboard American President Lines (hereinafter "APL") vessels as Chief Mate, a safety-sensitive position required by the vessels' Certificates of Inspection. Finally, the specification alleges that by so serving while not medically fit to do so, Respondent committed an act of incompetence.Appeal No. 2705Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/1/201410/1/201410/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2704 - FRANKSAPPEARANCES For the Government: CWO Christian Menefee, USCG LT Christopher Jones, USCG Coast Guard Sector Houston/Galveston Mr. Brian C. Crockett Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Respondent: Michael Aaron Franks, pro se Administrative Law Judge: Dean C. Metry This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter “D&O”) dated November 16, 2011, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter “ALJ”) of the United States Coast Guard dismissed the Coast Guard’s Complaint against Mr. Michael Aaron Franks (hereinafter “Respondent”). The Complaint alleged that Respondent was a user of or was addicted to the use of dangerous drugs. While the ALJ found that Respondent tested positive for cocaine metabolites during a drug test, because the ALJ determined that Respondent’s drug test was not conducted in accordance with the regulatory requirements of 46 C.F.R. Part 16 (the Coast Guard’s chemical testing requirements), the ALJ found the Coast Guard’s Complaint Not Proved and dismissed the matter with prejudice.Appeal No. 2704Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/30/20147/30/201410/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2703 - WEBERAPPEARANCES For the Government: LT Jeff A. Fry, USCG James P. Fink, USCG For Respondent: Terry D. Weber, prose Administrative Law Judge: Walter J. Brudzinski This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.P.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated September 22, 2011, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") of the United States Coast Guard revoked the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Terry D. Weber (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved a charge of use of dangerous drugs in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 7704(c) and 46 C.F.R. § 5.35. The specification found proved alleged that on January 31, 2011, Respondent submitted to a random drug test and provided a urine sample that tested positive for the presence of marijuana metabolites.Appeal No. 2703Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/4/201311/4/201310/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2702 - CARROLLAPPEARANCES For the Government: CWO Christian Menefee, USCG L T Christopher L. Jones, USCG Coast Guard Sector Houston/Galveston Mr. Gary F. Ball Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Respondent: Vuk S. Vujasinovic, Esq. Kenneth B. Fenelon, Jr., Esq. Vujasinovic & Beckcom, PLLC Administrative Law Judge: Dean C. Metry This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.P.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "0&0,.) dated January 20, 2012, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard suspended the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Shean Mason Carroll (hereinafter "Respondent") for twenty-four months upon finding proved two charges of misconduct in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 7703(1 )(b) and 46 C.F.R. § 5.27, by refusing a drug test. The specifications found proved alleged that on February 5, 2010, Respondent refused a drug test, following a determination that the temperature of his urine sample was outside the acceptable range, by failing to raise and lower his clothing to permit the observer to determine that he did not have a prosthetic device, and by possessing or wearing a prosthetic device that could be used to interfere with the sample collection process. The Coast Guard appeals.Appeal No. 2702Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/10/201310/10/201310/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2701 - CHRISTIANDECISION OF THE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL FROM DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES FROM THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD This appeal is taken in accordance with S U.S.C. § S04 and 49 C.F.R. Part 6. By order dated July 21,2011, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") of the United States Coast Guard denied Aaron Louis Christian's (hereinafter "Respondent's") application for attorney's fees and expenses incurred as a result of defending himself against a charge of misconduct brought by the Coast Guard against his merchant mariner credentials. Through its original Complaint, the Coast Guard alleged that Respondent committed misconduct and violation of law or regulation by manifesting a blood alcohol content level in excess of the Department of Transportation's Breath Alcohol standards. The Coast Guard subsequently amended its Complaint to remove the "violation of law or regulation" allegation. The allegation of misconduct remained and was a pending charge throughout all stages of the proceeding against Respondent's merchant mariner credentials. The misconduct allegation alleged that Respondent violated a company policy which prohibits employees from reporting to work under the influence of alcohol.Appeal No. 2701Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/22/20137/22/201310/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2700 -THOMASBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated June 2, 2011, Walter J. Brudzinski, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ'') of the United States Coast Guard, revoked the Merchant Mariner credential of Mr. Corinthis Emile Thomas (hereinafter "Respondent") upon a finding of default in a proceeding that alleged, as the basis for revocation, two counts of incompetence and one count of misconduct. PROCEDURAL HISTORY NO. ·27 0 0 i This case progressed as follows: • January 28, 2011-Coast Guard files Complaint against Respondent's Merchant Mariner credential alleging two counts of incompetence and one count of misconduct. • February 17, 2011-Complaint received at Respondent's address ofrecord and signed for by Respondent. • February 18, 2011-Respondent files his answer in the matter wherein he denies all jurisdictional and factual allegations and agrees with the proposed hearing dates of April 19, 20, or 21 , 2011, and the proposed hearing location at the Alexander Hamilton Customs House in New York, New York. • March 28, 2011-ALJ issues Scheduling Order in the case setting the hearing of April 20, 2011, at the Alexander Hamilton Customs House in New York, New York. • April 13, 2011-Coast Guard files a Motion for a Pre-Hearing Conference to be conducted via telephone. • April 14, 2011-ALJ issues Scheduling Order- Pre-Hearing Conference granting the Coast Guard's Motion for a Pre Hearing Conference and setting a teleconference for April 18, 2011 at 3 :00 p.m. EST. • April 18, 2011-Pre-Hearing Conference held, Respondent does not attend; Coast Guard moves orally for default due to Respondent's failure to appear. ALJ takes motion under advisement, providing Respondent the opportunity to appear at the hearing. [Memorandum and Order of Pre-Hearing Teleconference at 1) • April 20, 2011-Hearing held; Respondent does not attend and Coast Guard again moves orally for a default in the matter. [Order to Show Cause at 1-2]Appeal No. 2700Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/13/20127/13/201211/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2699 - MAXWELLOn September 23, 2010, the Coast Guard filed an original Complaint against Respondent, which was later amended. [D&O at 1] On November 30, 2010, after receiving an extension of time, Respondent filed an Answer to the original Complaint wherein he admitted all jurisdictional allegations but denied all factual allegations. [Id.] The Coast Guard filed its first Amended Complaint in the matter on December 20, 2010. [D&O at 1] On January 7, 2011, the Coast Guard filed a second Amended Complaint. [D&O at 2] The factual allegations of the second Amended Complaint alleged as follows: 1. On 07/29/2010, the Respondent, Earl W. Maxwell . . . was convicted of Use/Possession of Drug Paraphernalia by the District Court of Mobile County, Alabama. 2. Use/Possession of Drug Paraphernalia is a misdemeanor under the Code of the State of Alabama, Title 13A; Criminal Code Section 13A-12-260. 3. Code of the State of Alabama, Title 13A; Criminal Code Section 13A-12-260 is a Dangerous Drug Law of the State of Alabama. 4. The Respondent, Earl W. Maxwell was convicted within the last 10 years of violating a Dangerous Drug Law of a State, as described by Title 46 U.S. Code SectionAppeal No. 2699Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/13/20127/13/20128/24/2020
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2698 - HOCKINGBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter “D&O”) dated January 4, 2011, Michael J. Devine, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter “ALJ”) of the United States Coast Guard, ordered the revocation of the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. James Bruce Hocking (hereinafter “Respondent”) upon finding proved one charge of incompetence. The specification found proved alleged that, after Respondent submitted a completed Merchant Mariner Physical Examination Report (Form CG-719K) to the Coast Guard on December 4, 2008, the National Maritime Center (hereinafter “NMC”), on April 2, 2009, informed Respondent that he was not medically fit for merchant mariner duties due to a heart condition and the placement of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (hereinafter “ICD”). Thereafter, on multiple occasions between May 18, 2009, and May 31, 2009, Respondent served as Master of the M/V NANTUCKET, a Coast Guard-inspected passenger ferry, upon the waters of Nantucket Sound. The specification alleges that by so operating the vessel while not medically fit to do so, Respondent committed an act of incompetence.Appeal No. 2698Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/25/20124/25/201211/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2697 - GREENThis appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7703,46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated January 4,2011, Bruce T. Smith, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard at Paducah, Kentucky, ordered the revocation of the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Randy Joe Green (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved one charge of use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs. The specification found proved alleged that Respondent submitted to a random drug test on July 15,2010, and that the specimen that he provided subsequently tested positive for the presence of marijuana metabolites.Appeal No. 2697Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/14/201111/14/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2696 - CORSEThis appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.c. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Default Order dated October 15,2010, Bruce T. Smith, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard, revoked the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Brandon Scott Corse (hereinafter "Respondent") upon a finding of default in a proceeding that alleged, as the basis for revocation, use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs. The Complaint alleged that on January 23,2010, Respondent submitted to a reasonable suspicion drug test and provided a urine sample that tested positive for the presence of marijuana metabolites.Appeal No. 2696Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/18/20117/18/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2695 - AILSWORTHThis appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a decision and order (hereinafter "D&O") dated August 31, 2009, Michael J. Devine, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard, at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked the merchant mariner license of Mr. William Dea Ailsworth (hereinafter "Respondent"), upon finding proved one charge of negligence and two charges of violation of law or regulation. The first specification found proved alleged that on January 11 , 2009, Respondent, the master of a towing vessel, grounded a listing barge, the SL-119, and then caused it to sink on January 12, 2009, by negligently removing it from its beached position on the shore before remedying the cause of the list. The second specification found proved alleged that Respondent violated 46 C.F.R. § 4.05-10 by failing to submit a marine casualty report to the Coast Guard within five days of the sinking. The third specification found proved alleged that Respondent violated 46 C.F.R. § 4.05-1 by failing to notify the Coast Guard immediately of an occurrence materially affecting a vessel's seaworthiness when he failed to immediately notify the Coast Guard of the list that caused him to ground the SL-119. The ALJ dismissed a fourth specification alleging that Respondent wrongfully failed to comply with a subpoena to appear. APPEARANCES: Michael L. Donner, Sr., Esq., Hubbard, Terry & Britt, P.C. 293 Steamboat Road, Irvington, VA, 22480, for Respondent. The Coast Guard was represented by LT Candice Casavant, LT Aidan Van Cleef, and LT Maria Wiener, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads, 200 Granby Street, Suite 700, Norfolk VA, 23518.Appeal No. 2695Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/14/20116/14/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2694 - LANGLEYBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") delivered from the bench on February 26, 2010, and memorialized via written D&O dated March 2, 2010 (hereinafter "D&O II"), Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") Michael J. Devine of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked the Merchant Mariner Document of Mr. Harold Langley (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved one charge of misconduct. The misconduct charge found proved alleged that, while serving as a crew member aboard the USNS REGULUS, Respondent submitted a substituted urine sample during a random drug test conducted on June 29, 2009. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY At all times relevant herein, Respondent was the holder of a Coast Guard-issued Merchant Mariner Document. [D&O II at 3] On June 29, 2009, Respondent was employed by Maersk Line as a crew member aboard the USNS REGULUS and was working under the authority of his Coast Guard-issued Merchant Mariner Document.Appeal No. 2694Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/25/20115/25/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2693 - CONTRERASBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated March 17,2009, Walter Brudzinski, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard, at San Diego, CA, revoked the Merchant Mariner Document of Mr. Rocky Mel Contreras (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved five counts of misconduct. The misconduct charges were that: Respondent refused to stand his lookout watch in the manner ordered by the Chief Mate on the MN LIBERTY EAGLE; that Respondent, on three separate occasions, failed to obey the orders of the Master of the MN LIBERTY EAGLE to report for master's logging and dismissal procedures; and, that Respondent failed to reveal a 2003 conviction for vandalism on an April 2005 official Coast Guard application (Form CG-7l9B). Through the same D&O, Judge Brudzinski found one additional count of misconduct not proved and dismissed, without prejudice, two counts alleging violation a/law or regulation. At all times during the proceeding Respondent appeared pro se and appeals pro se.Appeal No. 2693Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/4/20114/4/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2692 - CHRISTIANBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated November 13, 2009, Bruce T. Smith, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, granted a Motion to Dismiss filed by Mr. Aaron Christian (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding that the Coast Guard had failed to prove the misconduct charge alleged in the Coast Guard's Amended Complaint. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Respondent was employed by Higman Marine Services and holds a merchant mariner's license and a merchant mariner's document issued by the U.S. Coast Guard. [D&O at 2] According to the Coast Guard's Complaint, on November 14, 2008, Respondent took and failed an alcohol test, providing a breath sample that indicated a blood alcohol content in excess both of federal limits and those permitted by his employer. [Id.l The Coast Guard filed its original Complaint against Respondent's Coast Guard-issued mariner credentials on May 6, 2009, alleging that Respondent committed misconduct and violation of law or regulation by manifesting a blood alcohol content level in excess of the Department of Transportation's Breath Alcohol Test standards. [D&O at 2} On August 5, 2009, the Coast Guard amended its Complaint to remove the "violation of law or regulation" allegation. [Id.} The Coast Guard did not remove the allegation of misconduct1 , and it remained a pending charge at all stages of the proceeding. [Id.} The misconduct allegation alleged that Respondent violated a company policy which prohibits employees from reporting to work under the influence of alcohol.Appeal No. 2692Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/28/20112/28/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2691 - JORYThis appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O) dated December 5, 2008, Judge Bruce T. Smith, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard at Mobile, Alabama, revoked the Merchant Mariner Credentials of Mr. Jack Anthony Jory (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding that the Coast Guard proved, by substantial evidence, that Respondent was a security risk that posed a threat to the safety or security of a vessel. The factual allegations supporting the Coast Guard's charge allege that "[o]n November 3, 2008, the Respondent did threaten the life of Jeff Cunningham, Master of the MN SEA FOX .. .in violation of 46 USCA 7703(5)." FACTS AND PROCEDURE At all times relevant herein, Respondent was the holder of the Coast Guard issued Merchant Mariner Credentials at issue here. [D&O at 3; Coast Guard Exhibit 1]Appeal No. 2691Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/22/201012/22/201011/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2690 - THOMASUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES COAST GUARD vs. MERCHANT MARINER LICENSE & MERCHANT MARINER DOCUMENT Issued to: MICHAEL J. THOMAS DECISION OF THE VICE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL NO·2690 This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "0&0") dated October 2,2009, Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") Bruce T. Smith revoked the Merchant Mariner Credentials of Mr. Michael J. Thomas (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding the Coast Guard's Complaint alleging misconduct proved. The Complaint alleged that Respondent committed an act of misconduct by refusing to submit to a post casualty drug test ordered by Respondent's marine employer.Appeal No. 2690Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/13/201012/13/201011/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2689 - SHINEUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTME T OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES COAST GUARD vs. MERCHANT MARINER LICENSE Issued to: ERIC NOR.\4A SHINE DECISION OF THE VICE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL NO. 2689 This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § nOI el seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. Bya Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated November 13,2008, Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") Walter J. Brudzinski revoked the merchant mariner license afEric Norman Shine (hereinafter "Respondent) upon finding proved the charge of incompetence. In finding the alleged violation proven, the AU made 53 findings of fact, including several findings related to Respondent's actions aboard two merchant vessels and others regarding Respondent's medical treatment history. Respondent appeals. APPEARANCE: Prior to filing his first appeal, Respondent was represented by Forgie, Jacobs & Leonard (Peter S. Forgie, Esq.), 4165 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 355, Westlake Village, CA 91362. From the time of his first appeal, Respondent has appeared pro se. The Coast Guard was represented by LCDR Chris Tribolet of U.S. Coast Guard Maintenance and Logistics Command Pacific, Alameda, California.Appeal No. 2689Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/30/201010/30/201011/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2688 - HENSLEYUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES COAST GUARD vs. MERCHANT MARINER LICENSE Issued to: GARY L. HENSLEY DECISION OF THE VICE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL NO. 2688 This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 ef seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated August 14, 2008, Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") Bruce T. Smith dismissed the Coast Guard's Complaint alleging use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs (for failure of a pre-employment drug test) against Gary L. Hensley (hereinafter "Respondent"). The AU dismissed the Coast Guard's Complaint upon finding that "[t]he Coast Guard did not prove Respondent failed a pre-employment drug test conducted in accordance with 46 C.F.R. Part 16 and 49 C.F.R. Part 40." [D&O at 17] The Coast Guard appeals.Appeal No. 2688Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/14/20106/14/201011/27/2017
Page 1 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.