CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2324 - AMATAGAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 June 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as utilityman on board the SS SANTA MARIA under the authority of the captioned document, on 20 October 1981, Appellant wrongfully possessed marijuana. The hearing was held at San Francisco, California on 6 January, 29 January, 4 February, 24 March and 5 April 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four documents and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence the testimony of one witness. After the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved and entered an order revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The Decision and Order was served on 12 July 1982. Appeal was timely filed on 28 July 1982 and perfected on 7 April 1983.Appeal No. 2324Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/16/19839/16/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2323 - PHILPOTTThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 13 January 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's document for six months, plus six months on twelve months probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Wiper on board the SS KEYSTONER under authority of the captioned document, on or about 8 December 1982, Appellant, at the Port of Houston, Texas had approximately ten grams of marijuana in his possession. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas and Long Beach, California on 17 December 1982 and 13 January 1983. At the hearing in Houston, Appellant was not present, but a motion for change of venue to Long Beach, California was made on his behalf and granted. At the hearing in Long Beach, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2323Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/13/19839/13/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2320 - MINTZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 30 September 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's seaman's document for three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that, while serving as Steward Utility on board the SS PRESIDENT POLK under authority of the above captioned document Appellant: (1) on or about 2 December 1979 failed to obey the order of the Chief Steward to mop and buff passenger deck passageways and to clean the passenger lounge and card room; (2) on or about 2 December 1979 created a disturbance in the Purser's foyer by using loud exclamations and profanity to the Chief Steward; (3) on 7 December 1979 failed to obey the order of the Chief Steward to clean the garbage room; and (4) on 8 December 1979 failed to obey the order of the Chief Steward to clean the garbage room. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 5 February, 14 and 17 April, 20 May, 10 and 12 June and 17 September.Appeal No. 2320Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/7/19839/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2321 - HARRISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. B239) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dates 8 February 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license for two months, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as master aboard SS COVE EXPLORER under authority of the above captioned license, between 21 November 1981 and 1 December 1981, Appellant, while responsible for the material condition of the vessel, operated the vessel in an unseaworthy condition, to wit, fractured and wasted frames, longitudinal and side plating in the bow section of the vessel. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts on 7 January 1982, January 1982 and 15 January 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel. Appellant pled not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2321Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/7/19839/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2322 - SHAWThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order rendered 16 February 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleged that, while holder of the document above captioned, on or about 17 August 1981, Appellant was convicted by the Twenty-Third Judicial District Court of St. James Parish, Louisiana, a court of record, for violation of Sections 967(A) and (C) of 40 Louisiana Revised Statutes, a narcotic drug law violation. The hearing was held at New York, New York, on 8 December 1981, 12 January 1982 and 27 January 1982, At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits.Appeal No. 2322Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/7/19839/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2319 - PAVELECThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 21 January 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's license for one month, plus two months on nine months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator on board the M/V CANDY STORE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 5 November 1981, Appellant failed to maintain a proper lookout which contributed to the collision between the M/V CANDY STORE and the F/V MISS LAVON. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas on 8 December 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by profesional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2319Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/6/19839/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2316 - MCNAUGHTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 15 January 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that while serving as master on board S.S. BAY STATE under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 29 July 1980, Appellant allowed said vessel to sail with insufficient metacentric height to meet the requirements set forth in the vessel's Trim and Stability Booklet. The Hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts on 21 October, 13 November, and 8 December 1980, and 6 January 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence 8 exhibits and the testimony of 2 witnesses including an expert on the calculation of metacentric height. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence 4 exhibits, his own testimony, and the testimony of one other witness.Appeal No. 2316Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/31/19838/31/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2317 - KONTOSThis appeal had been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C.239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 January 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked the seaman's document of Appellant, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an ordinary seaman aboard S/S LNG TAURUS under authority of his document above captioned, Appellant did on 20 November 1981 while S/S LNG TAURUS was in the port of Arun, Indonesia: (1) wrongfully fail to perform his duties by reason of intoxication; (2) assault and batter by beating with his fists a member of the crew, the Third Mate, Scott L. Ervin; (3) Assault and batter by biting on the lower leg a member of the crew, the Cargo Control Officer, William G. LANGELY; and (4) wrongfully damage the seawater temperature gauge and a light fixture with a chair in the Cargo Control Room. On 25 November 1981 the charges were served and the hearing was set for 13 January 1982. On 2 December 1981 Appellant telephoned the Administrative Law Judge requesting an earlier hearing sometime before Christmas. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request because the principal witnesses, were to be at sea between Indonesia and Japan until January 1982. Appellant was duly notified of this denial and the reasons for it by the Administrative Law Judge. The hearing was held in absentia at Boston, Massachusetts on 13 January 1982.Appeal No. 2317Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/31/19838/31/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2318 - STRUDWICKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 9 February 1983, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." Also on 9 February 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 15 February 1983. Decision on Appeal 2311 (STRUDWICK) of 17 May 1983 VACATED the Administrative Law Judge's order of 15 February 1983 and REMANDED the request for a temporary license for a new decision. By his order of 24 May 1983 the Administrative Law Judge again denied Appellant's request for a temporary license. BASIS OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge of 24 May 1983 denying a temporary license. Appellant urges that the denial was based on an erroneous interpretation of 46 CFR 5.30-15(b) and 46 CFR 5.03-5(b) prohibiting the issuance of temporary licenses and documents in cases involving those offenses listed in 46 CFR 5.03-5(b) as being deemed to affect the safety of life and property at sea.Appeal No. 2318Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/31/19838/31/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2315 - FIFERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 18 March 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." On 17 March 1983 Appellant file a Notice of Appeal from the Order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 24 March 1983. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge denying a temporary license. It is urged that Appellant's service on board a vessel is compatible with the requirements for safety of life and property at sea and Appellant's prior record justifies the issuance of a temporary license. I note that these are the criteria for issuing a temporary license set forth in 46 CFR 5.30-15 and that the Administrative Law Judge did not address them in his denial.Appeal No. 2315Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/6/19836/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2314 - CREWSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 April 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's document, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. One specification found proved alleged that while serving as Bosun on board the SS SANTA LUCIA under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 2 November 1980, Appellant wrongfully assaulted and battered a fellow crewmember by striking him in the face with his fist. A second specification found proved alleged a simple assault on 3 November 1980 on another crewmember. Additionally found proved are four specifications of either wrongful absence or wrongful failure to perform duties, none of which exceeds one day in duration, between 23 October 1980 and 2 January 1981. The hearing, in four sessions, was held at New York, New York on 12 January and 16 January 1981 and at Jacksonville, Florida on 30 January and 15 April 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and to specifications one through five and of guilty to specification six alleging a wrongful failure to report for duty at 0800 and 1300, 2 January 1981 while the SS SANTA LUCIA was at anchor at Callao, Peru.Appeal No. 2314Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/23/19835/23/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2312 - HITT IIIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 504 and 49 CFR Part 6. By order dated 21 July 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia denied Appellant's application for attorney's fees and expenses incurred as a result of defending himself against a charge of misconduct brought by the Coast Guard against his Operator's license. One specification supported the charge of misconduct. It was alleged that, while serving as Operator aboard tug LARK, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 0650 on 11 April 1982, while transiting the Nanticoke River Entrance, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties by leaving the tug bridge without proper relief. Appellant pled guilty to a concurrently filed negligence charge. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 11 May 1982. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an order in which he dismissed the misconduct charge and specification.Appeal No. 2312Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/22/19835/22/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2313 - STAPLESThis appeal has ben taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 3 December 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that, while serving as Second Pumpman on board the SS GULF OIL, O.N. 283424, under authority of the above captioned Merchant Mariner's Document, on or about 12 October 1981, Appellant did wrongfully assault and batter by beating with fists, a member of the crew, the Chief Engineer, Richard J. Driscoll; and, that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did wrongfully assault the Third Assistant Engineer, David W. Thunell by brandishing a fire axe and a pocketknife in a threatening manner and offering to inflict bodily harm. The hearing was held at Boston, Massachusetts on 3 December 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and both specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced two documents and the testimony of two witnesses into evidence. In defense, Appellant introduced seven documents and his own testimony into evidence.Appeal No. 2313Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/22/19835/22/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2310 - MANLEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 30 December 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." On 4 February 1983 Appellant requested a temporary document pending appeal. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by letter on 7 February 1983. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the denial of a temporary document by the Administrative Law Judge. It is urged that Appellant should have been issued a temporary document. OPINION The decision of the Administrative Law Judge states only that the request for the temporary document was received and is denied. This is not sufficient. The Administrative Procedure Act requires that an agency rejection of an application "be accompanied by a brief statement of the grounds for denial." See 5 USC 555e. The grounds must, ofAppeal No. 2310Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/17/19835/17/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2311 - STRUDWICKThis appeal has been take in accordance with 46 CFR 5.30-15. By order dated 9 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's mariner's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." Also on 9 February 1983 Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the Order of the Administrative Law Judge and a request for a temporary license. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by his order of 15 February 1983. BASES OF APPEAL This appeal has been taken from the order of the Administrative Law Judge denying a temporary license. It is urged that the denial was erroneously based on a regulation existing in 1957 which no longer exists and a decision based on that regulation instead of on the current regulations.Appeal No. 2311Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/17/19835/17/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2309 - CONENThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 7 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's seaman's document for three months, plus three months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved alleged that: (1) while serving as Electrician on board the SS MORMACSEA under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant did on or about 1700-1800, 10 December 1980, while the said vessel was in the port of East London, South Africa, wrongfully disobey a lawful order of the Chief Engineer by absenting himself from the vessel when instructed to remain on board; and (2) while serving as aforesaid did on or about 0900-1830, 14 December 1980, while the vessel was in Cape Town, South Africa, wrongfully fail to perform assigned duties. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 3,10,20 and 27 February 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and four exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence nine exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2309Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/12/19835/12/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2304 - HABECKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order date II June 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York suspended Appellant's mariner's license for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleged that, while serving as Master on board the United States SS CHARLESTON under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 4 April 1980, Appellant failed to properly supervise the vessel's bridge watch, which contributed to the grounding of the vessel. Appellant was also charged with failure to verify the vessel's position. However, this specification was dismissed at the end of the Investigating Officer's case upon motion by Counsel. The hearing was held at New York, New York on 22 and 27 August; 9 and 30 September; 7, 14 and 25 November; and 5 December 1980; 26 Jan; 6 and 25 February; 6 and 24 March; 2 April; and 19 and 20 May 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence one exhibit and testified in his own behalf.Appeal No. 2304Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19835/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2305 - SINGHThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 July, 1880, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license and seaman's document for 1 month on 12 months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Chief Engineer on board the United States T/V ALLEGIANCE, O.N.27866 under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 19 December 1979, Appellant: (1) Wrongfully failed to report a repair to a cargo pump, and (2) was negligent in maintaining and repairing the vessel's machinery and equipment. The hearing was held at Melville, Rhode Island and Boston, Massachusetts on 28 January, II and 26 February, II March, 16 April and II June 1980. The hearing was held in joinder with those of John D. Gaboury, Master of the vessel, and Timothy Fales, the Chief Mate. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2305Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19835/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2306 - FALESThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46 Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 25 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license for one month on twelve month's probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege: (1) That while serving as Chief Mate on board the United States T/V ALLEGIANCE, O.N. 271866 under authority of the license above captioned, between 12 October 1979 and 19 December 1979, Appellant had responsibility for all cargo equipment and failed to maintain that equipment in safe operating condition such that: 1. No. 10 cargo pump in aft pumproom was leaking from both shafts; 2. No. 11 cargo pump in aft pumproom was leaking excessively from packing gland; 3. Port bulkhead stop valve on suction line in aft pumproom was leaking through the packing gland; 4. No. 5 cargo pump suction line was holed and leaking in amidships pumproom; 5. No. 5 cargo line riser valve in amidships pumproom was leaking; 6. No 12 cargo pump discharge riser in aft pumproom was repaired with a cement patch. (2) That while so serving Appellant allowed an excessive amount of product to accumulate and remain in the amidships pumproom bilge creating a hazardous condition aboard the vessel.Appeal No. 2306Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19835/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2307 - GABOURYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license for one month, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States T/V ALLEGIANCE under authority of the license above captioned, on 19 December 1979, Appellant operated or allowed the said vessel to be operated in an unsafe condition in that the following hazardous conditions existed: 1. Excessive cargo product accumulation in the bilges of the amidships pumproom; 2. No. 10 cargo pump in aft pumproom leaking from both shafts; 3. No. 11 cargo pump in aft pumproom leaking excessively from packing gland; 4. No. 5 cargo pump suction line holed and leaking in amidships pumproom; 5. No. 5 cargo line riser valve in amidships pumproom leaking; 6. No. 12 cargo pump discharge riser in aft pumproom repaired with a cement patch; 7. Port bulkhead stop valve on suction line in aft pumproom leaking through packing gland. The hearing was held at Melville, Rhode Island and Boston, Massachusetts on 28 January, 11 and 26 February, 11 March, 16 April and 12 June 1980.Appeal No. 2307Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19835/9/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2308 - GRAYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 20 September 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California suspended Appellant's License for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Ocean Operator aboard the United States vessel C. DOMINATOR under authority of the license above captioned, on various dates between 12 May and 6 July 1982, Appellant wrongfully operated said vessel, a passenger vessel, without having on board an unexpired Certificate of Inspection. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 20 September 1982. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2308Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/5/19835/5/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2303 - HODGMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 3 February 1983, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding proved the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that being the holder of the document above captioned, on or about "20 May 1977 [Appellant was] convicted of conspiracy to violate Section 841(a)(I) of Title 21, United States Code (by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia) in that [he] did knowingly and intentionally possess with intent to distribute a quantity of marijuana." The hearing was held at Miami, Florida on 8 December 1982. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a certified copy of the Judgment of the Court, a copy of the Indictment, and the Affidavit of Service of the charge sheet. In defense, Appellant offered in evidence his own testimony, the testimony of one additional witness and five exhibits.Appeal No. 2303Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/22/19834/22/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2302 - FRAPPIERThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 January 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license for one month, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specification found proved under the charge of misconduct alleges that, while serving as Master on board the United States M/V BERT REINAUER II, O. N. 236989, under authority of the license above captioned, on or abut 18 May 1981, Appellant did wrongfully fail to report a marine casualty to the nearest Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection as required by 46 USC 239 and 46 CFR 4.05-10. The specification found proved under the charge of negligence alleges that Appellant, while so serving as Master on board the M/V BERT REINAUER II, O. N. 236989, did, on or about 18 May 1981, fail to navigate said vessel with due caution, causing said vessel to ground in the Penobscot River, Maine. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine and Boston, Massachusetts on 28 October 1981 and 9 November 1981.Appeal No. 2302Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/20/19834/20/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2301 - SIEMSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 14 April 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while the holder of the captioned document, was convicted on II December 1980, of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Kitsap County. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington on 17 March and 14 April 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced four documents into evidence including a certified copy of the order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Kitsap County which deferred sentence and granted probation. Appellant offered nothing in his own defense. At the end of the hearing, on 14 April 1981, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The order was served on Appellant in an open hearing on 14 April 1981. The complete decision and order was served on counsel on 30 April 1981. Appeal was timely filed on 20 April 1981 and perfected on 28 July 1981.Appeal No. 2301Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/13/19834/13/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2300 - STROHECKERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 504 and 49 CFR Part 6. By order dated 30 June 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia denied Appellant's application for attorney's fees and expenses incurred as a result of defending himself against a charge of negligence brought by the Coast Guard against his Operator's license. Three specifications supporting the charge were raised by the Coast Guard. They alleged that, while serving as Operator aboard Tug MARIE SWANN, O.N. 253463 under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 0550, 30 March 1982, in the James River at or near the City of Newport News in the State of Virginia, Appellant: (1) negligently failed to navigate said vessel in such a manner as to preclude the barge said vessel was towing, tank barge SWANN NO. 17, from alliding with M/V CENTAURO, thereby damaging said tank barge; (2) negligently navigated said vessel in such a manner as to endanger the life, limb or property of other persons, to wit, failing to maintain adequate communications with said vessel's line handlers, thereby contributing to the loss of control over the barge said vessel was towing, tank barge SWANN NO. 17, and the allision of said barge with M/V CENTAURO; (3) negligently navigated said vessel in such a manner as to endanger the life, limb or property of other persons, to wit; failing to connect the towing hawser before releasing the breast lines, thereby contributing to the barge said vessel was towing, SWANN NO. 17, being set adrift and alliding with the M/V CENTAURO. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 20 April 1982. After the presentation of Appellant's defense, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an order in which he dismissed the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2300Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/12/19834/12/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2299 - BLACKWELL IIIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 20 February 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct, Four specifications under a charge of misconduct, Charge II, were found proved. They allege that while serving on board the M/V CAN'T MISS, O.N. 294101, under authority of the Ocean Operator's license above captioned, on or about 12 April 1980, Appellant wrongfully operated the vessel while carrying passengers: 1. By operating beyond the scope of the route authorized on the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, to wit: over 20 miles from shore, in violation of 46 U.S. Code 390(b); 2. By using a portable gasoline stove for cooking in violation of 46 U.S.Code 170 and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 184.05-1; 3. By operating with unserviceable life preservers in violation of 46 U.S. Code 390(b) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 180.25; and 4. By operating with improperly secured life saving equipment, to wit: water light attached to buoyant apparatus was tied to the vessel in such a manner as to preclude being readily launched, in violation of 46 U.S. Code 390(b) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 180.15-1 and 180.20-1.Appeal No. 2299Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/7/19834/7/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2297 - FOEDISCHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.3-1. By order dated 13 July 1981, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for six months, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Ordinary Seaman on board the SS JOHN LYKES, O.N. 282772 under authority of the captioned document, on or about 9 May 1980, Appellant wrongfully possessed approximately 12.5 grams of marijuana, a narcotic. The hearing was held at Seattle, Washington on 8 December 1980, 5 February 1981 and 22 June 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six documents and a deposition. In defense, Appellant testified in his own behalf and offered eight documents in evidence. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to Appellant for a period of six months. The entire decision was served on 14 July 1981. Appeal was timely filed on 27 July 1981 and perfected on 26 October 1981.Appeal No. 2297Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/6/19834/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2298 - GRAVESThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239b and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 July 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleged that while holding the document and license above captioned, on or about 12 December 1979, Appellant was convicted in the 180th District Court of Harris County, Texas, a court of record, for the possession of marijuana in a quantity of more than four ounces. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 15 July 1980. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of guilty, which was later changed to not guilty, to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits.Appeal No. 2298Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/6/19834/6/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2295 - AMOURYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 March 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as Engine Utilityman on board the SS TRAVELER under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 3 March 1981 Appellant wrongfully possessed hashish while the vessel was in the port of Navlakhi, India. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California, on 17 March 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence a certification of the shipping articles and a certified copy of the official log of the vessel. In defense, Appellant offered the testimony of a shipmate and his own testimony. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant. The entire decision was served on Appellant on 30 March 1981. Appeal was timely filed on 6 April 1981 and perfected on 22 July 1981.Appeal No. 2295Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/30/19833/30/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2294 - TITTONISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for twelve months, and awarded an additional suspension of twelve months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Master on board SS LASH ATLANTICO under authority of the captioned license on or about 6 May 1981, Appellant negligently failed to navigate at a safe speed, negligently failed to use all available means to determine if a risk of collision existed or a close quarters situation was developing, and negligently made a succession of small course alterations thereby contributing to the collision of SS LASH ATLANTICO and M/V HELLENIC CARRIER. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 27, 28, and 29 May and 29 June 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses, two photographs, a chart, and two other documents. He also requested the Administrative Law Judge to take judicial notice of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, Title 33 U.S.C. foll.1602 (hereafter cited COLREGS, 1972, Rule ).Appeal No. 2294Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/29/19833/29/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2293 - RUBYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By orders dated 31 March and 8 April 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Baltimore, Maryland admonished Appellants, Peter S. Smith and Alexander Ruby, Jr., who were Master and Chief Engineer of the SS JACKSONVILLE, respectively. The specification of the misconduct charge alleges that while serving as Master and Chief Engineer of the vessel under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 21 January 1981, Appellants did not fail to notify the nearest Coast Guard Marine Safety Office of repairs affecting the safety of the vessel, namely, boiler tube plugging repairs. The hearing was held in joinder at Baltimore, Maryland on 30 January 1981. At the hearing, Appellants were represented by the same counsel. Both Appellants entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of four witnesses and one document. In defense, the Appellants offered in evidence the testimony of one witness and three documents. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification against Appellants were proved. He then served written orders of admonition on Appellants.Appeal No. 2293Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/21/19833/21/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2296 - SABOWSKIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 September 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license No. 500466 for three months, on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Master on board the United States SS EXXON CHESTER under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 18 June 1979, Appellant wrongfully failed: (1) to navigate said vessel at a safe speed adapted to the prevailing conditions of visibility; (2) to take avoiding action in ample time to avoid collision; and, (3) to reduce the speed of said vessel to the minimum at which she would be kept on course, upon having heard the fog signal of another vessel apparently forward of the beam. The hearing was held at New York City on 19 March, and continued on 20 March, 10 April, and 15 April 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each pecification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence 25 exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2296Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/20/19833/20/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2292 - COLEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 22 July 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida suspended Appellant's captioned license for two months, plus six months on twelve months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specifications of Charge 1 (misconduct), found proved, alleged that while serving as operator/person in charge on board the United States M/V GREEN COVE O.N. 587880, under authority of the license above captioned, from 16 March 1981 to 24 March 1981, Appellant wrongfully undertook a voyage in excess of 12 hours with one licensed operator and did wrongfully absent himself from the wheelhouse for a period of approximately 1-1/2 hours on 23 March 1981, leaving the responsibility of navigation of the vessel and tow to an unlicensed deckhand. The specification of Charge II (negligence), found proved, alleged that while serving as above on 23 March 1981, Appellant failed to post a proper watch in said vessel's pilot house thereby contributing to the collision between its tow and M/B FL 8158 BN, with loss of life.Appeal No. 2292Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/4/19833/4/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2291 - JOSEPHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 7 October 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas revoked Appellant's license upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Operator aboard M/V LADY ALICE, under authority of the captioned document, on 19 July 1981, Appellant assaulted and battered by cutting with a broken coffee cup, a member of the crew, James Burnham, while said vessel was underway on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas on 10 September 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and one exhibit.Appeal No. 2291Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/1/19833/1/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2289 - ROGERSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 September 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas revoked the seaman's document of Appellant, upon finding her guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that, while serving as a Steward/Utility on board USNS MAUMEE under authority of the document above captioned, Appellant (1) did on 18 January 1981 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully assault with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a pair of scissors, a member of the crew, John M. Wilson; and (2) did on 12, 13, 14, and 15 January 1981 while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully refuse to perform her duties by "not turning to." Appellant did not appear at the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence nine documents including certified copies of official log entries of the USNS MAUMEE.Appeal No. 2289Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/27/19832/27/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2290 - DUGGINSThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 9 March 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York issued an order of 12 months suspension outright of the above captioned document, and all other valid licenses, documents, certificates, and endorsements issued to the Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Boatswain on board the USNS SEALIFT CHINA SEA under the authority of the above captioned document, on or about 11 February 1980, while said vessel was at sea, the Appellant wrongfully assaulted First assistant Engineer, John K. Brown, by brandishing a fire hose nozzle in a threatening manner and offering to inflict bodily harm. The hearing was held in New York on 11 March, 17 April, 19 May, 3 June, 2 July, 2,15,30 September, 24 October, and 12, 24 November 1980.Appeal No. 2290Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/27/19832/27/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2288 - GAYNEAUXThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 10 February 1982, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Galveston, Texas suspended Appellant's license and Merchant Mariner's Document for one month plus an additional two months on twelve months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that, while serving as operator of the M/V OSASGE, under authority of the documents above captioned, on or about 17 October 1981, the Appellant failed to properly navigate said vessel within the confines of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, resulting in damage to an aid to navigation, at or near North Deer Island, near mile 360 and the Galveston Freeport Intracoastal Waterway Range F, front light. By separate order of 17 February 1982, the Administrative Law Judge authorized a temporary license and document pending disposition of the appeal. Issuance pursuant to this order was effected by the Marine Inspection Office, U.S. Coast Guard, Port Arthur, Texas on 17 February 1982.Appeal No. 2288Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/24/19832/24/198312/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2287 - RICKERThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g)dated 28 January 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts suspended Appellant's license no. 526748 for one month, on six month, on six months' probation, upon finding him guilty of misconduct and negligence. The specification of misconduct found proved alleges that, while serving as person in charge on board the United States T/V VINCENT TIBBETTS under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 29 September 1981, Appellant wrongfully failed to sign the declaration of inspection while in charge of loading operations aboard the vessel as required by 33 CFR 156.150(a). The specification of negligence found proved alleges that, at the same time and place he negligently failed to ensure that the #4 port cargo tank loading valve was closed upon completion of the loading of that tank allowing the tank to overflow and discharge oil in a hazardous amount into the Fore River, a navigable water of the United States. The hearing was held at Portland, Maine on 20 October 1981 from 1000 to 1512 and on 18 November 1981 from 1002 to 1258. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2287Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/15/198212/15/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2286 - SPRAGUEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 April 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania issued an order of admonition to Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved, alleges that while serving as CHIEF ENGINEER on board the SS COVE NAVIGATOR under authority of the license above captioned, between 3 January 1981 and 24 February 1981, Appellant failed to notify the Coast Guard, as required by the Certificate of Inspection, that the boiler management system was not operating properly. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on 25 March 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four documents and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2286Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198210/14/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2284 - BRAHNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 19 September 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of negligence. The two specifications found proved allege that while serving as operator on board M/V KELLEY, O.N. 299658, under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 18 August 1980, Appellant while transiting the intracoastal waterway, North Landing River, failed to maintain control of his tow, the Barge LOVELAND 6, resulting in two allisions, one at 0150 with the Pungo Ferry Bridge and the other at 0545 with the Great Bridge Bridge in the Albermarle-Chesapeake Canal. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia on 3 September 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification.Appeal No. 2284Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/8/198210/8/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2285 - PAQUINThis appeal was taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 29 April 1982, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Ignace, Michigan revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of the charge of "conviction for a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleged that while holding the document above captioned, on or about 23 March 1982, Appellant was convicted by the 92nd District Court, State of Michigan, a court of record, at the Mackinac County Court House, St. Ignace, Michigan, for possession of marijuana. The hearing was held at St. Ignace, Michigan on 29 April 1982. At the hearing elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and to the specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the Affidavit of Service of the charge sheet, the Judgement of Sentence signed by District Judge Robert A. Wood, 92nd District Court, State of Michigan, dated March 23, 1982, and a letter which indicated that, according to Coast Guard files, Appellant had no prior disciplinary record.Appeal No. 2285Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/8/198210/8/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2283 - FUEHRThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Second Mate on board the United States M/V W.W. HOLLOWAY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 September 1979, Appellant wrongfully departed the port of Milwaukee, WI, for Chicago, IL, and traversed Lake Michigan without the required endorsement on his license to wit: first class pilot upon the waters of Lake Michigan. The hearing was held at Chicago, IL on 18 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and three documents.Appeal No. 2283Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/24/19828/24/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2282 - LITTLEFIELDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 23 November 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Portland, Maine, suspended Appellant's license for 1 month on 12 months probation. The specification of the negligence charge found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator of M/V CAPTAIN LARRY, under authority of the captioned license, did at about 1315 on 6 August 1979, fail to adequately take into account the fall of the tide, causing said vessel to ground in the vicinity of Brewer's Boatyard Docks, Great Chebeague Island, Maine. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of four witnesses, and thirteen documents. In defense Appellant introduced his own testimony and three documents.Appeal No. 2282Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/24/19828/24/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2281 - BROMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 January 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, admonished Appellant upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States M/V W.W. HOLLOWAY under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 17 September 1979, Appellant departed the port of Milwaukee, WI, for Chicago, IL, and traversed Lake Michigan without the required licensed personnel aboard as required by the vessel's certificate of inspection, to wit: the vessel sailed without the second mate having the proper endorsement to be a first class pilot upon Lake Michigan. The hearing was held at Chicago, IL on 18 October 1979. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of one witness and three documents. The Appellant did not testify, call witnesses or introduce any documents.Appeal No. 2281Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/16/19828/16/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2280 - ARNOLDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 September 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's seaman's documents upon finding him guilty of misconduct and physical incompetence. The specifications found proved alleged that Appellant while serving as crew messman aboard the SS AUSTRAL LIGHTING, under authority of the captioned document, (1) did on or about 6 June 1981 fail to perform his assigned duties, by not serving breakfast; (2) did on or about 10 June 1981 while the vessel was in Sydney, Australia, fail to perform his duties, by not serving supper; (3) did on or about 10 June 1981 while the vessel was in Sydney, Australia fail to join for the continued voyage to Melbourne, Australia; (4) did on or about 20 June 1981, fail to perform his duties for reasons of intoxication; (5) did on or about 21 June 1981, fail to perform his duties for reasons of intoxication; (6) did on or about 22 June 1981 while vessel was in Brisbane, Australia, fail to join for the continued voyage to San Francisco, California; (7) was on or about 21 June 1981 while the vessel was in port at Brisbane, Australia, and at the time of the hearing was, physically incompetent to perform the duties of an American merchant seaman due to diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, and alcohol abuse.Appeal No. 2280Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/22/19827/22/198212/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2279 - LEWISThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated February 11, 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's seaman's document upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The amended specifications found proved alleged that while serving as Wiper on board the SS DELTA SUD under authority of the document above captioned, on or about 5 February 1981, Appellant wrongfully possessed a narcotic drug aboard the vessel, to wit: marijuana and did wrongfully engage in disorderly conduct by using foul and abusive language to both the officers of the DELTA SUD and Coast Guard marine inspectors. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 11 February 1981. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses and five exhibits. In defense Appellant testified on his own behalf. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge rendered an oral decision in which he concluded that the charge and both specifications had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant revoking all documents issued to Appellant.Appeal No. 2279Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/16/19827/16/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2278 - BELTONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 16 November 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for two months plus six months on eight months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board United States M/V CROCHET No. 2 under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 7 June 1981, Appellant negligently navigated said vessel causing a barge the vessel was towing to allide with the grounded S/V TALOFA LEE, damaging the pleasure craft. A hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 15 October 1981 and continued on 19 October 1981. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of four witnesses and four exhibits.Appeal No. 2278Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/14/19827/14/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2277 - BANASHAKThis appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 U. S. C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 28 May 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's documents for two months on four months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as operator on board M/V GULF HAWK under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 24 February 1980, Appellant: 1)failed to navigate his vessel with due caution by directing the movement of the vessel and tow to port in a close quarters situation, thereby contributing to a collision between SS TEXAS SUN and GULF HAWK's tow; and, 2)failed properly to utilize the radar while visibility was restricted. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 19 March 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits and the testimony of one witness. Appellant offered no evidence in defense. At the end of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge reserved decision. He subsequently entered findings that the charge and two specifications had been proved. He then served a written order on Appellant suspending all documents issued to him for a period of two months on four months' probation. The entire decision was served on 29 May 1980. Appeal was timely filed on 23 June 1980 and perfected on 7 November 1980.Appeal No. 2277Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/29/19826/29/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2275 - ALOUISEThis appeal had been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 239(g) and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 18 May 1981, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Mo. suspended Appellant's license for 2 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as operator on board the M/V R. E. DOYLE under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 9 May 1980, Appellant operated his vessel in a negligent manner creating an excessive wake which caused 15 barges to break loose from their moorings at Cleancoal Terminal Facility, Mile 535.2 L/B Ohio River. A hearing was held at Cincinnati, Ohio on 1 April and rehearing was held on 7 May 1981 to hear the testimony of a defense witness. At the hearings, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2275Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/4/19826/4/198212/21/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2276 - LUDLUMThis review has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 4 October 1977, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license for one month on twelve months' probation upon finding hin guilty of neglignece after a hearing held at Wilmington, North Carolina. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot of M/V TORRENT under authority of the license above captioned, on or about 23 August 1976, Appellant wrongfully failed to sound a danger signal upon meeting SS EASTERN SUN near buoy 50, on the Cape Fear River, thereby contributing to a collision between his vessel and SS EASTERN SUN. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of two witnesses, the deposition of another witness, and several documents.Appeal No. 2276Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/1/19826/1/198212/21/2017
Page 9 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.