CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2480 - LETTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By order dated 17b February 1988, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, admonished Appellant. This order was issued upon finding proved a charge of Violation of Law supported by two specifications. The first specification found proved that Appellant, while serving as Master of the M/V ALASKAN HERO, under the authority of the captioned license, did, from on or about 27 July 1987 through 24 September 1987, operate said vessel on the high seas while engaging or employing an unlicensed individual to serve as mate in violation of 46 U.S.C. SS8304. The second specification found proved that Appellant, while serving as Master of the M/V ALASKAN HERO, under the authority of the captioned license, did, from on or about 27 July 1987 through 24 September 1987, on the high seas, allow a non- U.S. citizen to serve as an officer in charge of a deck watch on a documented vessel in violation of 46 U.S.C. SS8103.Appeal No. 2480Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/21/19891/21/198911/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2493 - KAAUAThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By order dated 9 May 1988, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Honolulu, Hawaii, revoked Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document. This order was issued upon finding proved a charge of misconduct supported by two specifications. The specifications found proved were that Appellant, while serving as an Ordinary Seaman/Waitress aboard the SS INDEPENDENCE, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 11 March 1988, while said vessel was at sea, did wrongfully have in her possession certain narcotic drugs, to wit, marijuana, and did wrongfully have in her possession certain drug paraphernalia, to wit, a pipe and rolling papers. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii, on 9 May 1988. The Appellant was represented by professional counsel at the hearing and entered an answer of deny to the charge and to each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced a total of six exhibits which were admitted into evidence, and called two witnesses, one of whom testified in person, and one whom testified via a conference telephone connection from the Naval Investigative Service Forensic Science Laboratory at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The Appellant introduced eight exhibits which were admitted into evidence, and called one witness who testified in person. Appellant also voluntarily testified in her own defense.Appeal No. 2493Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/11/19891/11/198911/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2479 - BRANCHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By order dated 8 February 1988, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, suspended Appellant's Merchant Mariner's License for three months remitted on conditions of probation for twelve months. This order was issued upon finding proved a charge of negligence supported by a single specification. The specification found proved that Appellant, while serving as a towboat operator aboard the M/V BILL FROREICH, under the authority of the captioned license, did, on or about 5 October 1987, negligently navigate said vessel by failing to arrange a proper meeting situation with the M/V JANET DICHARRY, thereby contributing to a collision in the vicinity of mile marker 179 on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana on 20 January 1988. Appellant appeared at the hearing with counsel, and entered, in accordance with 46 CFR SS5.527(a), an answer of deny to the charge of negligence and the supporting specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and called three witnesses. Following the conclusion of the Coast Guard's case, Appellant moved to dismiss the charge and specification for failure of proof. The Administrative Law Judge took the motion under advisement, and Appellant elected not to present any evidence or call any witnesses in his own behalf. After the hearing the Administrative Law Judge rendered a decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been found proved, and entered a written order suspending all licenses and/or documents issued to Appellant as specified above.Appeal No. 2479Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/5/19891/5/198911/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2477 - TOMBARIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 C.F.R. 5.701. By his order dated 14 December 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's License for twelve months plus on additional twelve months remitted on twelve months probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification thereunder found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving in the capacity of Chief Engineer under the authority of the captioned license, on board the R/V ENDEAVOR, did fail to insure that certain safety precautions were taken regarding the shifting of the electrical load from ship's power to shore power, resulting in the death of an Assistant Engineering Officer on or about 11 August, 1986. The hearing was held at Providence, Rhode Island on 9, 10 and 11 December 1986, and on 30 September 1987. To clarify any confusion regarding this case, it must be noted that the Administrative Law Judge who initially presided over the hearings in December, 1986, died on 14 August 1987. Before his death, he had completed his findings and conclusion of law, but had not rendered a final Decision and Order. The case was reassigned to another Administrative Law Judge on 1 September 1987, who subsequently completed the hearing on 30 September 1987, and issued the final Decision and Order on 4 November 1987.Appeal No. 2477Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/28/198812/28/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2476 - BLAKEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 16 December 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States coast Guard at Alameda, California, revoked Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document. This order was issued upon finding proved a charge of misconduct supported by a single specification. The specification found proved that Appellant, while serving as an Able- Bodied Seaman aboard the G/T CHEVRON OREGON, under the authority of the captioned document, did, on or about 26 December 1986, while said vessel was at the loading/unloading facility offshore of El Segundo, California, wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotic drugs, to wit, marijuana. The hearing was held at Alameda, California, on 22 July 1987. The Appellant was represented by professional counsel at the hearing and entered an answer of deny to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced a total of six exhibits which were admitted into evidence, and called three witnesses, two of whom testified in person, and one who testified via a conference telephone connection from Long Beach Coast Guard Marine Safety Office. Appellant introduced no evidence and called no witnesses on his own behalf. The Decision and Order was served on Appellant on 18 December 1987. A notice of appeal was received by the Administrative Law Judge on 13 January 1988.Appeal No. 2476Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/30/198811/30/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2474 - CARMIENKEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By order dated 4 September 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended outright Appellant's Merchant Mariner's License and Document for one month, and further suspended them for an additional two months under probationary terms for six months following the termination of the outright suspension. This order was issued upon finding proved a charge of misconduct and a charge of negligence. Each charge was supported by one specification. The misconduct charge was initially supported by two specifications. The first specification was withdrawn at the hearing. The misconduct charge and specification found proved that Appellant, while serving as the operator of the tug ORION, under the authority of the captioned license and document, on or about 27 February 1987, failed to maintain a proper lookout by sight and hearing as required by Rule 5 of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREGS '72), 33 U.S.C. foll. 1602, which contributed to the collision of the barge USL-501, while under the tow of the tug ORION, with the M/V UNITED PEACE in the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of the Sabine Pass Sea Buoy. The negligence charge and specification found proved that Appellant, while acting as the operator on board the tug ORION, under the authority of the captioned license and document, on or about 27 February 1987, failed to take early and substantial action to avoid a collision with the M/V UNITED PEACE, as required by Rule 8(a) and 8(c) of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREGS '72), 33 U.S.C. foll. 1602.Appeal No. 2474Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/10/198811/10/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2473 - MARTUCCIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By his order dated 23 December 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, revoked Appellant's Document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification thereunder found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving under the authority of the captioned document, on board the USNS CAPELLA, did wrongfully have in his possession certain narcotics, to wit: hashish. The charge was brought by the Government under the provisions of 46 U.S.C. 7704. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas on 19 October 1987. On 18 October 1987, Appellant had requested a change of venue to Hawaii, where he was residing, however, that request was denied, hearing on 19 October 1987 was held without the presence of the Appellant and under the in absentia provisions of 46 C.F.R. 5.515. In accordance with 46 C.F.R. 5.527 the Administrative Law Judge entered an answer of deny on behalf of the Appellant to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2473Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/7/198811/7/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2475 - BOURDOThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 4 November 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Licenses for a period of seventeen months. The licenses were suspended outright for the first five months of this suspension period. Appellant would serve the following twelve months of the suspension on probation provided that no charge under 46 U.S.C. 7703 or 7704, or any other navigation or vessel inspection law, was proved of outright suspension or acts committed within twelve months form the date of termination of the foregoing outright suspension. This order was issued upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and violation of regulation. Each charge was supported by thirty-one specifications. A charge of negligence supported by nine specifications was withdrawn by the Investigating Officer prior to Appellant's answer being entered.Appeal No. 2475Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/7/198811/7/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2471 - BARTLETTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By his order dated 16 June 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Los Angeles/Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's License and Document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The three specifications thereunder found proved allege that Appellant, while serving under the authority ofthe captioned document and license, on bard the SS PRESIDENT F.D. ROOSEVELT: (1) on 11 August 1986, wrongfully had in his possession Valium (Diazepam); (2) on 11 August 1986, wrongfully attempted to enter the room of a crewmember; and (3) on 18 August 1986, wrongfully falsified a government document by giving false information regarding his prior record when seeking to upgrade his license. The hearing was held at Long Beach, California on 16 December 1986, 8 and 29 January 1987, and on 18 February 1987. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered an answer of deny to the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2471Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/6/198810/6/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2470 - GIACHETTIThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order of 13 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document, upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant did, while serving as master aboard the SS MORMACSTAR, under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 9 October 1984, fail to obey the orders of the Military Sealift Command Preparedness Group One to get the vessel underway for convoy exercises and a surveillance run; and that Appellant did, while serving as stated, on the same date, commit an act of barratry by instituting an illegal job action by wrongfully refusing to sail the vessel as ordered by its owner and the Department of the Navy, thereby causing the vessel to be placed off hire from its charter, an act which was to the injury of the owner. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 21 May and 12 June 1985. Appellant was present at the hearing, and was represented by professional counsel. He denied the charge and specifications.Appeal No. 2470Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/23/19888/23/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2469 - VETTERThis request for issuance of a temporary license has been accepted and reviewed in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7701 and 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 22 March 1988, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, revoked Appellant's license and document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The misconduct charge was supported by four specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as Third Assistant Engineer aboard the S/S OVERSEAS CHICAGO on or about 3 February 1988, (1) wrongfully returned from shore leave approximately one half hour prior to his scheduled watch in an intoxicated condition; (2) wrongfully assaulted and battered the Master, Cecil Smith by striking him with his fist and kicking him; (3) wrongfully created a disturbance by using foul and abusive language toward the Master, Cecil Smith; and (4) wrongfully assaulted and battered the Chief Mate, William Miller by kicking him. On 20 April 1988, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested that the Order of the Administrative Law Judge be stayed pending appeal or that a temporary license pending appeal be issued. On 21 April 1988, the Administrative Law Judge denied Appellant's request for a temporary license. On 23 May 1988, Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the denial of his request for a stay in this matter or the issuance of a temporary license. Appellant has not filed a brief in support of his notice of appeal.Appeal No. 2469Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/2/19888/2/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2467 - TOMBARIThis request for issuance of a temporary license has been accepted and reviewed in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7701 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By order dated 4 November 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended outright Appellant's license for twelve months and for a further twelve months on probation upon finding proved a charge of negligence. The negligence charge was supported by a single specification which alleged that Appellant, while serving as Chief Engineer aboard the R/V ENDEAVOR on or about 11 August 1986, negligently failed to ensure that safety precautions, such as (1) that the connections were in fact completed at the connection box aboard the vessel; (2) that shore power was available as indicated at the distribution panel; (3) that the connections at the shore side connection box were properly completed; (4) that communications between the [Appellant] and his subordinates verified that the ship was ready to receive shore power; (5) that the subordinate engineers aboard the vessel were aware that the evolution was about to take place; the evolution specifically being the shifting of ship's power to shore power, were taken prior to directing the shifting of the electrical load from the ship's power to shore power, which resulted in the death of Miss Alison Rollins, who was serving as an engineer aboard the R/V ENDEAVOR on the day in question.Appeal No. 2467Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/12/19887/12/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2468 - LEWINThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 30 June 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended outright Appellant's Merchant Mariner's License with endorsements for a period of two months upon finding proved a Charge of Misconduct, supported by four specifications and a Charge of Negligence, supported by one specification. The first specification found proved under the Charge of Misconduct alleged that Appellant, while acting under the authority of the captioned license as pilot aboard the T/V CHEVRON COLORADO, on or about 14 August 1986, while said vessel was underway on the Columbia River, wrongfully failed to comply with 33 U.S.C. 2006, Inland Navigation Rule 6, by failing to travel at a moderated speed in fog and restricted visibility, contributing to the collision with the barge T/B FOSS 121. The second specification found proved under the Charge of Misconduct alleged that Appellant, while acting under the authority of the captioned license a pilot aboard the T/V CHEVRON COLORADO, on or about 14 August 1986, while said vessel was underway on the Columbia River, wrongfully failed to comply with 33 U.S.C. 2007, Inland Navigation Rule 7, by failing to properly determine the risk of collision between the T/V CHEVRON COLORADO and the barge T/B FOSS 121, contributing to the collision of these vessels.Appeal No. 2468Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/12/19887/12/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2466 - SMITHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 3 November 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for two months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence and misconduct. The single specification supporting the negligence charge found proved alleges that on or about 13 August 1987, Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V M. T. SCHEU, under the authority of the captioned license, at approximately Mile 198.1, Arkansas River, negligently allowed an unlicensed individual to operate an uninspected towing vessel and assume direct control of the operation of that vessel. The single specification supporting the misconduct charge found proved alleges that on or about 13 August 1987, Appellant did , while serving as operator aboard the M/V M.T. SCHEU, under the authority of the captioned license, at approximately Mile 198.1, Arkansas River, wrongfully permit said vessel to be operated in violation of the manning requirements of 46 U.S.C. 8904.Appeal No. 2466Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/28/19886/28/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2465 - O'CONNELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order of 11 February 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Tampa, Florida, suspended Appellant's license outright for four months, plus nine months remitted on twelve months probation, upon finding proved the charge of negligence. He also suspended Appellant's license outright for an additional two months for violating a previous order of suspension on probation. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, while serving as pilot aboard the M/V SEAFARER under the authority of the captioned license, on or about 19 August 1985, while the vessel was assisting the T/B OCEAN 255 inbound in Tampa Bay, fail to perform his duty to direct and control the vessel as required, in that he failed adequately or prudently to navigate the vessel resulting in the grounding of the tank barge OCEAN 255 in the vicinity of Buoy 11J, Tampa Bay, Florida.Appeal No. 2465Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/10/19885/10/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2478 - DUPREThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By his order dated 30 September 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's Merchant Mariner's license and document for a period of one month upon finding proved the charges of negligence, misconduct, and violation of law. The specification supporting the charge of negligence alleged that Appellant, while serving under the authority of his above-captioned license and document, aboard the towing vessel ADMIRAL LEE, did, on 15 February 1987, tow the unmanned freight barge CMS-754 in an unsafe and hazardous manner, to wit: operating with a load in excess of the vessel's stability letter. The specification supporting the charge of misconduct alleged that Appellant, acting under the authority of his license and document aboard the ADMIRAL LEE, on 15 February 1987, failed to insure that the CMS-754 was loaded in compliance with the vessel's stability letter issued by the U.S. Coast Guard. The specification supporting the charge of violation of law alleged that Appellant, under the authority of his license and document, violated 46 U.S.C. SS2302, however, the Coast Guard withdrew this charge and its specification at the commencement of the hearing. The hearing was held at Houston, Texas on 5 August 1987. The Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered an answer of denial to the charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2478Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/4/19882/4/198811/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2461 - KITTRELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. SS7702 and 46 CFR SS5.701. By order dated 22 January 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri admonished Appellant upon finding proved the charge of Violation of Regulation. The charge was initially supported by three specifications. However, the Administrative Law Judge found one specification involving 46 CRF SS35.35-1(c) not proved and dismissed this count. One specification found proved alleged that Appellant, serving as person-in-charge aboard Tank Barge T-7953, under the authority of his merchant mariner's document, on or about 25 April 1986, while transferring oil to Tank Barge T-7953 from Packer River Terminal at Mile 857.0, Upper Mississippi River, wrongfully absented himself from the barge in violation of 33 CFR 156.120(s). The remaining specification found proved alleged that Appellant, serving as person-in-charge aboard Tank Barge T-7953, under the authority of his merchant mariner's document, on or about 25 April 1986, while transferring oil to Tank Barge T-7953 from Packer River Terminal at Mile 857.0, Upper Mississippi River, wrongfully failed to provide a flame screen or proper supervision for the open No. One ullage hole in violation of 46 CFR 35.30-10.Appeal No. 2461Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/7/198712/7/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2437 - SMITHThis review has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart K. By order dated 25 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Respondent's license for three months on twelve months probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Respondent, while serving as Operator aboard the M/V STEEL CHALLENGER, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 15 January 1985, failed to maintain adequate control of his vessel and tow thereby allowing the tow to allide with the Greenville Highway Bridge at Mile 531.3, Lower Mississippi River. That order was appealed. On appeal, the Vice Commandant issued an order in which he set aside the finding of the Administrative Law Judge as to the charge of negligence, vacated the order suspending Respondent's license, and remanded the case to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings. Appeal Decision 2437 (SMITH). On remand, the Administrative Law Judge reopened the hearing. The reopened hearing was held at Memphis, Tennessee, on 3 March 1987.Appeal No. 2437Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/25/198711/25/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2460 - REEDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order of 24 November 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding him incompetent to serve on board merchant vessels of the United States. the incompetence charge is supported by three specifications which allege that Appellant, while serving under the authority of his Merchant Mariner's document as an Able-bodied Seaman aboard the SS PRESIDENT FILLMORE, while the ship was at sea, did: (1) At or about 1300 hours, 8 June 1986, fail to obey an order, to wit: After specifically being told not to use water about any electrical equipment, he washed down the anchor windlass hydraulic unit and associated electrical equipment with salt water; (2) Between the hours of 0000 and 0400 on 19 March 1986, improperly disrupt engine room operations, to wit: he was observed to be talkingAppeal No. 2460Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/5/198711/5/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2459 - LORMANDThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 13 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license and Merchant Mariner's Document upon finding proved the charge of conviction for narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned license and document, on or about 27 June 1983, Appellant was convicted by the 16th Judicial District Court of St. Martin's Parish, Louisiana for attempted possession of marijuana, barbiturates, and cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of the Revised Statutes of Louisiana. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 5 and 13 November 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and admitted that he had been convicted as set forth in the specification in issue.Appeal No. 2459Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/19/198710/19/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2458 - GERMANThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 12 March 1987, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Charleston, South Carolina, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by two specifications, both of which were found proved. The first specification alleged that at or about 1515 on December 6, 1986, while serving aborad the USNS SIRIUS, moored at the Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia, the Appellant, acting under the authority of the captioned document, wrongfully had in his possession a dangerous drug, namely marijuana. The second specification alleges that Appellant, at the same time and date and while serving in the same capacity, wrongfully had in his possession an alcoholic beverage, namely beer, in violation of a ship's standing order. The hearing was held at Charleston, South Carolina on 12 March 1987. At the hearing Appellant represented himself and answered admit to the first specification and no contest to the second specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and no witnesses were called to testify.Appeal No. 2458Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198710/14/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2472 - GARDNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. #7702 and 46 CFR #5.701. By order dated on 28 September 1987, an Administrarive Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended, on six months probation, Appellant's Merchant Mariner's License and Document for a period of one month upon finding proved a Charge of Misconduct, supported by one specification. The specification found proved under the Charge of Misconduct alleged that Appellant, while serving as Master aboard the ferry CONE JOHNSON, under the authority of the captioned license and document, did, at or about 2:49 PM local time on 21 June 1987. while overtaking a sailing vessel on Galveston Bay, a navigable waterway of the United States, fail to keep out of the way of the overtaken vessel as required by Rule 13 of the Inland Navigation Rules, to wit: the ferry CONE JOHNSON's passage did cause the operator of the sailing vessel to lose control of his vessel.Appeal No. 2472Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/6/19878/6/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2457 - YOUNGThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order of 23 June 1986, and Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for four months, remitted on twelve months probation, upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MARJORIE B. MCALLISTER, on or about 15 November 1985, failed safely to navigate the M/V MARJORIE B. MCALLISTER, its tow, the T/B CIBRO SAVANNAH, and the assist tug M/V WALTON, within the Chelsea River, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, contributing to the allision of the T/B CIBRO SAVANNAH with the fending system of the Chelsea Street Bridge resulting in damage to the fending system. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as stated above, failed safely to navigate the M/V MAJORIE B. MCALLISTER, contributing to the allision of the T/B CIBRO SAVANNAH with the moored tug LEIGH ANN REINAUER. Three other specifications alleging negligence were found not proved. They alleged that Appellant failed safely to navigate the flotilla described, contributing to the allision with and damage to Chelsea River Lighted Buoy No. 2 by the tank barge and the assist tug, that Appellant failed safely to navigate the assist tug, and that Appellant failed safely to navigate the flotilla, contributing to theAppeal No. 2457Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/5/19878/5/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2456 - BURKEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR P art 5, Subpart J. By order of 7 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document outright for three months, plus six months remitted on probation for twelve months, upon fining proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, while acting under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 3 March 1986, at the Regional Examination Center, Boston, Massachusetts, wrongfully submit an application for a raise of grade, form CG-866, with invalid information on the sea service form, claiming ocean service onboard the SS LAKE CHARLES when the vessel was in a "lay-up " status. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 7 October 1986. Appellant was present at the hearing, and was represented by professional counsel. He denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of five witnesses, and also introduced three exhibits.Appeal No. 2456Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/23/19877/23/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2455 - WARDELLThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part e, Subpart J. By order of 5 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast guard at Seattle, Washington, suspended Appellant's license outright for three months upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, under the authority of the captioned license, while serving as pilot aboard the SS GREAT LAND, at or about 1:05 to 1:23 a.m. on 17 March 1985, during the vessel's approach on Cook Inlet and Knik Arm to Terminal 3. Port of Anchorage City Dock, wrongfully fail to properly navigate the vessel thereby causing an allision of the vessel with Terminal 3. Port of Anchorage City Dock. The hearing was held at Anchorage, Alaska, on 4,5,6, and 7 November 1985. Appellant was present at the hearing, and was represented by professional counsel. He denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of eight witnesses, and also introduced thirty-four exhibits.Appeal No. 2455Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/20/19877/20/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2454 - LYONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order of 3 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document outright for one year, plus an additional three months remitted on eighteen months probation, upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved allege that Appellant did, under the authority of the captioned license, while serving as pilot aboard the M/V FEDERAL CALUMET, at or about 8:00 p.m. on 25 November 1985, wrongfully direct the movement of the vessel in St. Louis Bay, Superior, Wisconsin, while under the influence of an intoxicant. The hearing was held at Duluth, Minnesota, on 21 May 1986. Appellant was present at the hearing, and was represented by professional counsel. He denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence the testimony of three witnesses, and also introduced five exhibits.Appeal No. 2454Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/26/19876/26/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2452 - MORGANDEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 4 November 1986, as Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California suspended Appellant's document for a period of 18 months, plus an additional twelve months suspension on 24 months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge found proved was supported by six specifications. The first specification alleged that Appellant, while serving as Able Bodied Seaman aboard S/S Mason LYKES, under authority of the captioned document, did, on or about 1650, 6 June 1983 while the vessel was in Apra Harbor, Guam, wrongfully disobey a lawful command of the Third Mate, in that he refused to go to the bow as directed. The second specification alleged that Appellant, while serving in the same capacity on or about 1230, 9 July 1983, while the vessel was at the Port of Oakland, California, wrongfully assaulted and battered the Chief Mate, by poking Appellant's finger into the Chief Mate's chest. The third specification alleged that Appellant, while serving in the same capacity, on or about 1230 9 July 1983, while the vessel was at the Port of Oakland, California, wrongfully assaulted and battered the Master by grabbing his arm. The fourth specification alleged that Appellant, while serving in the same capacity, on or about 9 July 1983, while the vessel was at the Port of Oakland, California, wrongfully interfered with the Master, in his official duty to protect a member of the crew, by refusing to obey the Master's order to leave the ship. The fifth specification alleged that Appellant, while serving as Able Bodied Seaman aboard S/S SANTA JUANA, under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1030, 17 August 1985 while the vessel was at sea, wrongfully assaulted and battered a member of the crew by striking him.Appeal No. 2452Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/24/19876/24/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2453 - WEDGEWORTHThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J. By order dated 3 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for four months remitted on twelve months probation upon finding proved a charge of negligence. The negligence charge was supported by a specification which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V TAMERA PICKETT, under authority of the captioned document, on or about 26 August 1985, failed to maintain adequate control of said vessel and tow resulting in an allision with the stationary DREDGE II at approximately Mile 283 on the Arkansas River. The hearing was held at Memphis, Tennessee, on 28 May 1986. Appellant was represented by professional counsel at the hearing, and denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence seven exhibits and the testimony of three witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence four exhibits, his own testimony,Appeal No. 2453Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/22/19876/22/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2451 - PAULSENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 21 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California revoked Appellant's document upon finding proved the charges of Misconduct and Use of Narcotics. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications. The first alleged that Appellant, while serving as Fireman/Watertender aboard SS Constitutional, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 22 February 1984 while the vessel was at sea enroute to Nawiliwili, Kauai, wrongfully use narcotics, to wit: Cocaine. The second misconduct specification alleged that while serving as in the same capacity at the same time and place Appellant wrongfully distributed cocaine to a member of the crew. The specification under the charge of Use of Narcotics alleged that Appellant, while serving as Fireman/Watertender aboard SS Constitution, being the holder of captioned document, was on or about 22 Feb 1984 while the vessel was en route to Nawiliwili, Kauai, a user of narcotics and did use certain narcotics, to wit: cocaine. The hearing was held at Honolulu, Hawaii, on 10, 22, 23, and 24 March 1984. The hearing in this case was consolidated with four other cases arising from incidents aboard the Constitution.Appeal No. 2451Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/11/19876/11/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2450 - FREDERICKSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 701. By order dated 22 September 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V NATIVE SON, on or about 26 April 1986 negligently failed to keep clear while overtaking another vessel, and negligently crossed the bow of another vessel, thus endangering the life, limb and property of the passengers and crew aboard the two vessels. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while in preparation for a trip from St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands to Tortola, British Virgin Islands, on or about 10 May 1986, failed to give a safety orientation prior to getting underway or to have placards posted as required by 46 CFR 185.25-1(d), and while acting in the same capacity on the same date failed to have on board and available for inspection his license as required by 46 CFR 185.10-1.Appeal No. 2450Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/11/19876/11/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2448 - POWERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 29 May 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, suspended Appellant's license for one month outright, plus and additional two months remitted on nine months' probation upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and negligence. The specification under the misconduct charge alleges that while serving as Docking Pilot aboard the M/V VERGO, under the authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1 September 1984, Appellant piloted the vessel in Newbold Channel, Delaware River, an area beyond the scope of his license. The specification under the negligence charge alleges that, while serving in the same capacity on the same date, Appellant caused the vessel to ground in the Delaware River. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 26 March and 16 April 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and specifications.Appeal No. 2448Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19876/8/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2449 - VANRIGHTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 5 June 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for six months outright, plus an additional six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported buy two specifications, both of which were found proved. The first specification alleged that on or about 17 January 1986, Appellant, while serving as second assistant engineer aboard the SS OVERSEAS ALASKA, under the authority of the captioned documents, while the vessel was at sea and Appellant was on watch, wrongfully failed to obey the direct order of the first assistant engineer in that Appellant failed to leave the engine room area and go to the operating platform. The second specification alleges that Appellant, on the same date and while serving in the same capacity, wrongfully assaulted the first assistant engineer with a hammer, and assaulted and battered the first assistant engineer with his fists, resulting in injury to the first assistant engineer.Appeal No. 2449Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/8/19876/8/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2447 - HODNETTThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 16 January 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for two months, remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by two specifications. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V BELCHER PENSACOLA, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 18 July 1984, wrongfully failed to give notice as soon as possible to the nearest Coast Guard Marine Safety Office of the accidental grounding of tank barge Belcher No. 35, under tow of the BELCHER PENSACOLA, as required by 46 CFR 4.05-1. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while acting in the same capacity, on or about 19 July 1984, after an underwater survey and the unauthorized repair of tank barge Belcher No. 35 at Key West, Florida, wrongfully failed to make known to officials designated to enforce inspection laws, at the earliest opportunity, a marine casualty producing serious injury to said tank barge.Appeal No. 2447Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/10/19874/10/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2446 - WATSONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 11 July 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for four months outright plus an additional four months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on or about September 1, 1985, Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V ETTA KELCE, under the authority of the captioned document, failed to post a proper lookout, a violation of Rule 5 of the Inland Rules of the Road, at approximately Mile 44 on the Kanawha River, West Virginia. The hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri on 15 April 1986. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and denied the charge and specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence four exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses.Appeal No. 2446Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/19/19873/19/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2445 - MATHISONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 16 January 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for two months, remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V BELCHER PENSACOLA, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 20 July 1984, after an underwater survey and the unauthorized repair of tank barge Belcher No. 35 at Key West, Florida, wrongfully failed to make known to officials designated to enforce inspection laws, at the earliest opportunity, a marine casualty producing serious injury to said tank barge in violation of 46 USC 3315. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida. on 13 March 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2445Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/6/19873/6/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2444 - RABATSKYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 11 July 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the united States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license for three months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on or about June 26, 1985, Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V JOHN M. SELVICK, under the authority of the captioned document, operated the vessel and two on Lake Michigan during a period of darkness without ensuring that the tow was equipped with adequate navigational sidelights as required by Rules 22 and 24 of the Inland Navigational Rules. The hearing was held at Chicago, Illinois on 20 March 1986. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and denied the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence ten exhibits and the testimony of one witness.Appeal No. 2444Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/10/19872/10/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2443 - BRUCEThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 28 April 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license outright for one month, plus an additional six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE, under the authority of the captioned document, failed to properly attain and/or use available weather information prior to proceeding to sea with the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE and the tow GULF FLEET 263, contributing to the failure of the towing connection and grounding of the barge GULF FLEET 263. A second specification under the charge of negligence, alleging a failure to properly examine towing gear, was found not proved and was dismissed. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 21 and 30 January 1986.Appeal No. 2443Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/5/19871/5/198711/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2442 - ALLBRITTENThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 6 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month remitted on three months' probation upon finding proved the charge of negligence. The specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V MIRIAM M. DEFELICE, under the authority of the captioned document, while the vessel was towing the barge GULF FLEET 263 and navigating in conditions of fog and restricted visibility on the St. Johns River, failed to navigate the vessel with caution causing the barge to strike the Buckman Bridge. The hearing was held at Jacksonville, Florida, on 2 August; 5, 13 and 20 September; and 2 October 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2442Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/16/198612/16/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2440 - LYONSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 3 October 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, suspended Appellant's license and merchant mariner's document for one year outright, plus an additional three months on eighteen months' probation upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that Appellant, while serving as Pilot on board the M/V FEDERAL CALUMET, on or about 25 November 1985, wrongfully directed the movement of the vessel while under the influence of an intoxicant. On 13 October 1986, Appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested a temporary license pending approval. The Administrative Law Judge denied the request by order dated 22 October 1986.Appeal No. 2440Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/198612/10/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2441 - HESTERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 26 September 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation." The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 15 December 1983, Appellant was convicted by the State of Mississippi, Circuit Court of Jackson County, of possession of marijuana. The hearing was held at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 25 September 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel. The Administrative Law Judge entered on Appellant's behalf an answer of denial to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits.Appeal No. 2441Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/10/198612/10/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2439 - FREDERICKSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 CFR 5.707. By order dated 22 September 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while serving as operator on board the M/V NATIVE SON, on or about 26 April 1986 negligently failed to keep clear while overtaking another vessel, and negligently crossed the bow of another vessel, thus endangering the life, limb and property of the passengers and crew aboard the two vessels. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications which alleged that Appellant, while in preparation for a trip from St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands to Tortola, British Virgin Islands, on or about 10 May 1986, failed to give a safety orientation prior to getting underway or to have placards posted as required by 46 CFR 185.25-1(d), and while acting in the same capacity on the same date failed to have on board and available for inspection his license as required by 46 CFR 185.10-1.Appeal No. 2439Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/5/198612/5/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2438 - TURNERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 19 July 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's license for six months upon finding proved the charges of negligence and misconduct. The negligence specifications found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as operator aboard the M/V GULF QUEEN, under authority of the captioned document, did on or about 9 March 1985 fail to sound proper whistle signals, while said vessel was at anchor in an area of restricted visibility, at or near 28°55'N and 92°52'W in the Gulf of Mexico. The misconduct specification found proved alleges that Appellant did, on or about 8 March 1985, proceed on a voyage of greater than 12 hours, without the required number of licensed operators on board, at or near 28°55'N and 92°52'W in the Gulf of Mexico. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 15 April 1985. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications.Appeal No. 2438Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/24/198611/24/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2435 - BABERThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 22 January 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Miami, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of conviction for a narcotic drug law violation. The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 12 August 1983, Appellant was convicted by the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida for possession of cocaine, in violation of F.S. 893.03(2)(a)(4) and F.S. 893.13(1)(e). The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 22 January 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits. Appellant introduced in evidence one exhibit and his own testimony.Appeal No. 2435Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198610/14/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2436 - STAFFNEYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 USC 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 1 November 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, suspended Appellant's license for one month, remitted on three months' probation, upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The first specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, between 22 and 27 January 1985, wrongfully operated the vessel ZENOVIA carrying passengers for hire while the vessel was documented exclusively for pleasure, in violation of 46 CFR 67.45-19. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, under the authority of the captioned license, during the same time period, wrongfully operated the ZENOVIA carrying passengers for hire while liquified petroleum gas was used, in violation of 46 CFR 25.45-1(a), 46 CFR 147.03-11 and 46 CFR 147.05-100 Table S.Appeal No. 2436Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/14/198610/14/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2434 - CORVELEYNThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 7 March 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Alameda, California, suspended Appellant's license for six months remitted on twelve months' probation upon finding proved the charge of Violation of Regulation. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master aboard the S.S. AMERICAN SPITFIRE, under the authority of the captioned document, on or about 17 December 1985, Appellant sailed from Midway Island in the Pacific Ocean with incompatible cargo stowage in hold no. 2. The specification further alleges that certain Class X-A explosives were incompatibly stowed with certain Class VII explosives, in that the two were separated by a structure made of wood boards that did not meet the minimum requirements for a partition bulkhead, in violation of 46 CFR 146.29-51(a) and (b), the chart accompanying 46 CFR 146.29-99 and 46 CFR 146.29-100, and the definition of a partition bulkhead at 46 CFR 146.29-11(c)(36). A second specification also alleging a violation of regulation was found not proved and was dismissed by the Administrative Law Judge.Appeal No. 2434Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/1/198610/1/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2433 - BARNABYThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.701. By order dated 3 February 1986, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at St. Louis, Missouri, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charges of "conviction of a narcotic drug law violation" and "misconduct." The first specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 22 December 1978, Appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois for possession of cannabis, a dangerous drug with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: marijuana. The second specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while making application to the U.S. Coast Guard Regional Examination Center, Toledo, Ohio for renewal of his license, misrepresented the particulars of his prior record by failing to reveal a prior conviction for possession of cannabis.Appeal No. 2433Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/22/19869/22/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2432 - LEONThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.SC. 7702 and former 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 18 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked Appellant's merchant mariner's document upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The charge was supported by three specifications which alleged that appellant, while serving as A.B. on board the S.S. STONEWALL JACKSON, on or about 1 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by being asleep on watch; on or about 3 February 1985 wrongfully failed to perform his duty as lookout by not timely relieving the watch; and on or about 19 February 1985 had in his possession marijuana. The hearing was held at Norfolk, Virginia, on 19 March, 2 April, 24 April, 15 May, and 21 May 1985. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence five exhibits and the testimony of one witness. In defense, Appellant testified on his own behalf, and introduced in evidence one exhibit and the testimony of one additional witness.Appeal No. 2432Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/4/19869/4/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2431 - HERNANDEZThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1 (currently 46 CFR Part 5, Subpart J). By order dated 28 February 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's document for one month outright plus an additional two months' suspension on ten months' probation upon finding proved the charges of misconduct and inattention to duty. The misconduct charge was supported by two specifications. The specifications found proved allege that Appellant, while serving as person in charge aboard T/B NMS 1906, under authority of the captioned documents, on or about 1655, 27 January 1985, (1) did fail to insure that the cargo tank butterworth covers were securely shut prior to cargo transfer resulting in an oil spill into the Calcasieu River (33 CFR 156.120(e)), and (2) did transfer oil from said barge without the required oil transfer procedures. The inattention to duty specification found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as aforesaid, did fail to insure both of the required fire extinguishers were in serviceable condition prior to cargo oil transfer. The hearing was held at Port Arthur, Texas, on 19 February 1985. At the hearing, Appellant appeared without professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charges and supporting specifications. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence six exhibits and the testimony of two witnesses. In defense, Appellant introduced in evidence two exhibits. The Administrative Law Judge rendered a written Decision and Order on 28 February 1985. He concluded that the charge and specifications of misconduct and the charge and specification of inattention to duty had been proved and suspended Appellant's document for one month outright plus an additional two months' suspension on ten months' probation.Appeal No. 2431Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/21/19868/21/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2428 - NEATThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 23 July 1958, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Jacksonville, Florida, revoked Appellant's license upon finding proved the charge of "narcotics conviction." The specification found proved alleges that, being the holder of the captioned document, on or about 12 June 1987, Appellant was convicted by the Twenty-fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana, a court of record, for knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: marijuana. A second charge, alleging misconduct, was found not proved. The hearing was held at Miami, Florida, on 23 July 1985. Appellant appeared at the hearing without counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence two exhibits.Appeal No. 2428Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/7/19868/7/198611/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2429 - ROBERTSThis appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 7702 and 46 CFR 5.30-1. By order dated 10 June 1985, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, admonished Appellant upon finding proved the charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that while serving as pilot aboard the Greek flag M/V VERGO, under the authority of the captioned documents, on 4 September 1984, Appellant piloted the vessel on the Delaware River from Fairless Steel Works, Trenton, New Jersey, to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, an are beyond the scope of his license. Aa second charge, alleging negligence, was found not proved and was dismissed. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 28 March, 18 April, and 8 May 1985. At the hearing Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification.Appeal No. 2429Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority8/5/19868/5/198611/30/2017
Page 6 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.