CreatorTitleDescriptionPublication NumberOrganizationPublication DateEffective DateExpiration DateUploaded On
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2682 - REEVESUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : DECISION OF THE : UNITED STATES COAST GUARD : COMMANDANT : vs. : ON APPEAL : MERCHANT MARINER DOCUMENT : NO. 2682 : : : Issued to: ARLAN T. REEVES : This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By an “Order Granting Coast Guard’s Motion for Default and Order of Revocation” (hereinafter “Default Order”) dated April 5, 2007, Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter “ALJ”) Anthony B. Canorro, revoked the Merchant Mariner Document (hereinafter “MMD”) of Mr. Arlan T. Reeves (hereinafter “Respondent”) upon a finding of default in a proceeding that alleged use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs. The Complaint from which the Default Order resulted alleged that on October 19, 2006, Respondent submitted to a post accident drug test and provided a urine sample that tested positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites.Appeal No. 2682Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/8/20085/8/200811/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2683 - DESIMONEUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES COAST GUARD VS. MERCHANT MARINER LICENSE Issued to: MICHAEL G. DESIMONE DECISION OF THE VICE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL N026S3 This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.c. § 7701 el seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order dated July 8, 2005 (hereinafter "D&O"), Judge Walter J. Brodzinski, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "All") of the United States Coast Guard at New York, New York, revoked the merchant mariner license of Mr. Michael G. DeSimone (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved a charge of misconduct. The specification alleged that Respondent was convicted of violating a dangerous drug law of the State ofNew York within 10 years of the initiation of the Coast Guard suspension and revocation proceedings.Appeal No. 2683Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/6/200911/6/200911/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2684 - SCARBOUGHUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES COAST GUARD vs. DECISION OF THE VICE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL MERCHANT MARINER LICENSE Issued to: JAMES C. SCARBOUGH NO. 1 2.684 This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By an Order Approving Settlement Agreement and Denying Respondent's Request to Set Aside Settlement Agreement dated October 25, 2007, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALl") of the United States Coast Guard approved a Settlement Agreement between the Respondent and the Coast Guard in which Respondent's Merchant Mariner License was suspended for one month following his admission of all jurisdictional and factual allegations in the Complaint alleging violation of law or regulation. Respondent subsequently perfected an appeal of the Settlement Agreement on December 21, 2007, claiming he was coerced to enter into the Settlement Agreement. I have learned that subsequent to the filing of his appeal, based on information from Coast Guard Sector Guam and Respondent's counsel of record, that Respondent is deceased.Appeal No. 2684Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/6/200912/6/200911/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2691 - JORYThis appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O) dated December 5, 2008, Judge Bruce T. Smith, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard at Mobile, Alabama, revoked the Merchant Mariner Credentials of Mr. Jack Anthony Jory (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding that the Coast Guard proved, by substantial evidence, that Respondent was a security risk that posed a threat to the safety or security of a vessel. The factual allegations supporting the Coast Guard's charge allege that "[o]n November 3, 2008, the Respondent did threaten the life of Jeff Cunningham, Master of the MN SEA FOX .. .in violation of 46 USCA 7703(5)." FACTS AND PROCEDURE At all times relevant herein, Respondent was the holder of the Coast Guard issued Merchant Mariner Credentials at issue here. [D&O at 3; Coast Guard Exhibit 1]Appeal No. 2691Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/22/201012/22/201011/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2692 - CHRISTIANBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated November 13, 2009, Bruce T. Smith, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, granted a Motion to Dismiss filed by Mr. Aaron Christian (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding that the Coast Guard had failed to prove the misconduct charge alleged in the Coast Guard's Amended Complaint. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Respondent was employed by Higman Marine Services and holds a merchant mariner's license and a merchant mariner's document issued by the U.S. Coast Guard. [D&O at 2] According to the Coast Guard's Complaint, on November 14, 2008, Respondent took and failed an alcohol test, providing a breath sample that indicated a blood alcohol content in excess both of federal limits and those permitted by his employer. [Id.l The Coast Guard filed its original Complaint against Respondent's Coast Guard-issued mariner credentials on May 6, 2009, alleging that Respondent committed misconduct and violation of law or regulation by manifesting a blood alcohol content level in excess of the Department of Transportation's Breath Alcohol Test standards. [D&O at 2} On August 5, 2009, the Coast Guard amended its Complaint to remove the "violation of law or regulation" allegation. [Id.} The Coast Guard did not remove the allegation of misconduct1 , and it remained a pending charge at all stages of the proceeding. [Id.} The misconduct allegation alleged that Respondent violated a company policy which prohibits employees from reporting to work under the influence of alcohol.Appeal No. 2692Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/28/20112/28/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2693 - CONTRERASBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated March 17,2009, Walter Brudzinski, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard, at San Diego, CA, revoked the Merchant Mariner Document of Mr. Rocky Mel Contreras (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved five counts of misconduct. The misconduct charges were that: Respondent refused to stand his lookout watch in the manner ordered by the Chief Mate on the MN LIBERTY EAGLE; that Respondent, on three separate occasions, failed to obey the orders of the Master of the MN LIBERTY EAGLE to report for master's logging and dismissal procedures; and, that Respondent failed to reveal a 2003 conviction for vandalism on an April 2005 official Coast Guard application (Form CG-7l9B). Through the same D&O, Judge Brudzinski found one additional count of misconduct not proved and dismissed, without prejudice, two counts alleging violation a/law or regulation. At all times during the proceeding Respondent appeared pro se and appeals pro se.Appeal No. 2693Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/4/20114/4/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2694 - LANGLEYBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") delivered from the bench on February 26, 2010, and memorialized via written D&O dated March 2, 2010 (hereinafter "D&O II"), Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") Michael J. Devine of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked the Merchant Mariner Document of Mr. Harold Langley (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved one charge of misconduct. The misconduct charge found proved alleged that, while serving as a crew member aboard the USNS REGULUS, Respondent submitted a substituted urine sample during a random drug test conducted on June 29, 2009. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY At all times relevant herein, Respondent was the holder of a Coast Guard-issued Merchant Mariner Document. [D&O II at 3] On June 29, 2009, Respondent was employed by Maersk Line as a crew member aboard the USNS REGULUS and was working under the authority of his Coast Guard-issued Merchant Mariner Document.Appeal No. 2694Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/25/20115/25/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2695 - AILSWORTHThis appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a decision and order (hereinafter "D&O") dated August 31, 2009, Michael J. Devine, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard, at Norfolk, Virginia, revoked the merchant mariner license of Mr. William Dea Ailsworth (hereinafter "Respondent"), upon finding proved one charge of negligence and two charges of violation of law or regulation. The first specification found proved alleged that on January 11 , 2009, Respondent, the master of a towing vessel, grounded a listing barge, the SL-119, and then caused it to sink on January 12, 2009, by negligently removing it from its beached position on the shore before remedying the cause of the list. The second specification found proved alleged that Respondent violated 46 C.F.R. § 4.05-10 by failing to submit a marine casualty report to the Coast Guard within five days of the sinking. The third specification found proved alleged that Respondent violated 46 C.F.R. § 4.05-1 by failing to notify the Coast Guard immediately of an occurrence materially affecting a vessel's seaworthiness when he failed to immediately notify the Coast Guard of the list that caused him to ground the SL-119. The ALJ dismissed a fourth specification alleging that Respondent wrongfully failed to comply with a subpoena to appear. APPEARANCES: Michael L. Donner, Sr., Esq., Hubbard, Terry & Britt, P.C. 293 Steamboat Road, Irvington, VA, 22480, for Respondent. The Coast Guard was represented by LT Candice Casavant, LT Aidan Van Cleef, and LT Maria Wiener, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads, 200 Granby Street, Suite 700, Norfolk VA, 23518.Appeal No. 2695Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/14/20116/14/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2696 - CORSEThis appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.c. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Default Order dated October 15,2010, Bruce T. Smith, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard, revoked the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Brandon Scott Corse (hereinafter "Respondent") upon a finding of default in a proceeding that alleged, as the basis for revocation, use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs. The Complaint alleged that on January 23,2010, Respondent submitted to a reasonable suspicion drug test and provided a urine sample that tested positive for the presence of marijuana metabolites.Appeal No. 2696Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/18/20117/18/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2697 - GREENThis appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7703,46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures set forth in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated January 4,2011, Bruce T. Smith, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard at Paducah, Kentucky, ordered the revocation of the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Randy Joe Green (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved one charge of use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs. The specification found proved alleged that Respondent submitted to a random drug test on July 15,2010, and that the specimen that he provided subsequently tested positive for the presence of marijuana metabolites.Appeal No. 2697Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/14/201111/14/201111/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2698 - HOCKINGBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter “D&O”) dated January 4, 2011, Michael J. Devine, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter “ALJ”) of the United States Coast Guard, ordered the revocation of the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. James Bruce Hocking (hereinafter “Respondent”) upon finding proved one charge of incompetence. The specification found proved alleged that, after Respondent submitted a completed Merchant Mariner Physical Examination Report (Form CG-719K) to the Coast Guard on December 4, 2008, the National Maritime Center (hereinafter “NMC”), on April 2, 2009, informed Respondent that he was not medically fit for merchant mariner duties due to a heart condition and the placement of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (hereinafter “ICD”). Thereafter, on multiple occasions between May 18, 2009, and May 31, 2009, Respondent served as Master of the M/V NANTUCKET, a Coast Guard-inspected passenger ferry, upon the waters of Nantucket Sound. The specification alleges that by so operating the vessel while not medically fit to do so, Respondent committed an act of incompetence.Appeal No. 2698Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/25/20124/25/201211/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2700 -THOMASBy a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated June 2, 2011, Walter J. Brudzinski, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ'') of the United States Coast Guard, revoked the Merchant Mariner credential of Mr. Corinthis Emile Thomas (hereinafter "Respondent") upon a finding of default in a proceeding that alleged, as the basis for revocation, two counts of incompetence and one count of misconduct. PROCEDURAL HISTORY NO. ·27 0 0 i This case progressed as follows: • January 28, 2011-Coast Guard files Complaint against Respondent's Merchant Mariner credential alleging two counts of incompetence and one count of misconduct. • February 17, 2011-Complaint received at Respondent's address ofrecord and signed for by Respondent. • February 18, 2011-Respondent files his answer in the matter wherein he denies all jurisdictional and factual allegations and agrees with the proposed hearing dates of April 19, 20, or 21 , 2011, and the proposed hearing location at the Alexander Hamilton Customs House in New York, New York. • March 28, 2011-ALJ issues Scheduling Order in the case setting the hearing of April 20, 2011, at the Alexander Hamilton Customs House in New York, New York. • April 13, 2011-Coast Guard files a Motion for a Pre-Hearing Conference to be conducted via telephone. • April 14, 2011-ALJ issues Scheduling Order- Pre-Hearing Conference granting the Coast Guard's Motion for a Pre Hearing Conference and setting a teleconference for April 18, 2011 at 3 :00 p.m. EST. • April 18, 2011-Pre-Hearing Conference held, Respondent does not attend; Coast Guard moves orally for default due to Respondent's failure to appear. ALJ takes motion under advisement, providing Respondent the opportunity to appear at the hearing. [Memorandum and Order of Pre-Hearing Teleconference at 1) • April 20, 2011-Hearing held; Respondent does not attend and Coast Guard again moves orally for a default in the matter. [Order to Show Cause at 1-2]Appeal No. 2700Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/13/20127/13/201211/27/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2708 - SOLOMONAPPEARANCES For the Government: CWO Dan Sammons, USCG LT John D. Nee, USCG Senior Investigating Officer Mark Gibbs For Respondent: Graham W. Syfert, Esq. Administrative Law Judge: Dean C. Metry This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated May 15, 20 ~ 3, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") of the United States Coast Guard suspended the Merchant Mariner Document of Ms. Simone Joyce Solomon (hereinafter "Respondent") for fourteen months upon finding proved one charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleges that on July 2, 2012, Respondent, while serving as a crewmember aboard the vessel ALLIANCE CHARLESTON, refused a chemical test, in violation of 49 C.F .R. § 40.191 (b ), by submitting what according to 49 C.F.R. § 40.93(b) was a substituted specimen.Appeal No. 2708Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/18/20155/18/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2709 - COFFYAPPEARANCES For the Government: LT Gregory J. Knoll, USCG LT Jessica L. Bohn, USCG LT Eric L. Sumpter, USCG Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads Respondent: Mr. William Tee Coffy, pro se Administrative Law Judge: Michael J. Devine This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated January 7, 2013, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard revoked the Merchant Mariner Credential of Mr. William Tee Coffy (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved one specification of use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs. The specification found proved alleges that Respondent submitted to a random drug test on May 3, 2012, and that the specimen that he provided subsequently tested positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites.Appeal No. 2709Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/3/20156/3/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2710 - HOPPERAPPEARANCES For the Government: Gary F. Ball, Esq. LT Takila S. Powell, USCG For Respondent: William B. Hidalgo, Esq. Administrative Law Judge: Bruce Tucker Smith This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter “D&O”) dated September 10, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter “ALJ”) of the United States Coast Guard dismissed with prejudice the Coast Guard’s Complaint seeking revocation of the Merchant Mariner Credential of Mr. Nelson Greg Hopper (hereinafter “Respondent”). The Complaint charged Respondent with use of, or addiction to the use of, dangerous drugs. The Complaint alleged that Respondent participated in a random drug test and his samples tested positive for cocaine metabolites. The ALJ found that the Coast Guard had failed to establish a prima facie case because it did not prove that Respondent had been ordered to test in accordance with 46 C.F.R. Part 16. Although the record shows that the service agent for Respondent’s employer used a computer-based random number generator to produce a list of vessels for drug testing, which included the vessel in which Respondent served, the ALJ found that the Coast Guard had failed to prove that the selection was random because it did not establish that the selection was made by a scientifically valid method.Appeal No. 2710Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/13/201510/13/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2711 - TROSCLAIRAPPEARANCES For the Government: Bruce L. Davies, Esq. CWO James R. Mints, USCG Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur For the Respondent: Christopher H. Riviere, Esq. William N. Abel, Esq. Law Office of Christopher H. Riviere Administrative Law Judge: Bruce Tucker Smith This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated April 23, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard revoked the Merchant Mariner Credential of Mr. Byron Anthony Trosclair (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved two specifications of negligence and one specification of misconduct. The first negligence specification alleges that Respondent, while acting under the authority of his Coast Guard-issued license as Master of the STARFLEET PATRIOT, was negligent in that he failed to ensure that the STARFLEET PA TRI OT was positioned close enough to the platform that was the destination of his passengers to ensure the safe swing rope transfers of the passengers, and intentionally made the swing rope transfers more difficult than necessary in order to provide "training" for the passengers that were transferring from the ST ARFLEET PATRIOT to the platform. The second negligence specification alleges that Respondent, while in the same capacity, was negligent in that he failed to have the vessel's rescue ladder/platform in a ready position during passenger transfers from the ST ARFLEET PA TRI OT to the work platform, and failed to provide any rescue assistance to a passenger who had fallen overboard while attempting to swing from the vessel to the platform. The misconduct specification alleges that Respondent, while in the same capacity, violated 46 U.S.C. § 2303 by wrongfully failing to render assistance to an overboard passenger after a marine casualty.Appeal No. 2711Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority12/1/201512/1/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2712 - MORRISAPPEARANCES For the Government: LCDR Maureen D. Johnson, USCG Mr. John J. Hulslander Coast Guard Sector Buffalo For Respondent: Mrs. Ana Magdalena Morris, as Representative Administrative Law Judge: Michael J. Devine This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated March 7, 2013, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard dismissed the Complaint against the Merchant Mariner Document of Mr. Kwame Rey Morris (hereinafter "Respondent"). The Coast Guard Complaint charged use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs, specifically alleging that Respondent submitted to a random drug test, and that the specimen he provided tested positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites. Upon determining that the Coast Guard failed to provide substantial evidence that Respondent's positive drug test met all the elements of a prima facie case, the ALJ found the charge not proved and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.Appeal No. 2712Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/5/20161/5/201610/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2713 - SCOTOAPPEARANCES For the Government: Mr. Gary F. Ball, Esq. Mr. James P. Fink Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Respondent: Mr. Terrence S. Cox, Esq. Courtney M. Crawford, Esq. Cox, Wooten, Griffen, Hanson & Poulos, LLP Administrative Law Judge: Parlen L. McKenna This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and 33 C.F .R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated November 7, 2011, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard ordered the suspension of Respondent's Coast Guard-issued Merchant Mariner License for one month upon finding proved one allegation of misconduct. The Coast Guard properly appealed. I have learned that Respondent passed away following the filing of the Coast Guard's appeal. Past Commandant's Decisions on Appeal have held that when a Respondent dies during the pendency of his appeal, the ALJ's order should be vacated and the Coast Guard's Complaint against his mariner credential should be dismissed. Appeal Decision 2684 (SCARBOUGH) (2009);Appeal Decision 2134 (JOHNSON) (1978) (citing Melrose Distillers, Inc. v. United States, 359 U.S. 271, 272 (1959)). This result mirrors the custom in Federal practice to abate the proceeding ab initio when the defendant dies. "The only fair and reasonable disposition [of the pending litigation when a Respondent dies] is to wipe the slate clean" by dismissing the matter. JOHNSON at 3. This case is distinguishable from the two precedents cited in that the Government rather than the Respondent has lodged the appeal. The result should, nonetheless, remain the same. See DiOrio v. Nicholson, 216 Fed.Appx. 974 (2007) (when the Government appealed a veteran's benefit decision and the veteran died during the pendency of that appeal, the decision was vacated).Appeal No. 2713Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/5/20161/5/201610/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2714 - EAJA DAVISAPPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES FROM THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD APPEARANCES For the Government: Mr. Brian C. Crockett, Esq. Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Applicant: Mr. Brian McEwing, Esq. Reeves McEwing, LLP Administrative Law Judge: Walter J. Brudzinski This appeal is taken in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 504 and 49 C.F.R. Part 6. By order dated June 5, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard denied the application for attorney's fees and expenses of Clint Walker Davis, Jr. ("Applicant"), incurred as a result of defending himself at a Suspension and Revocationproceeding ("S&R proceeding") against a charge of use of or addiction to the use of dangerous drugs brought by the Coast Guard against his merchant mariner credential. In its Complaint, the Coast Guard alleged that Applicant, an active-duty Coast Guard member, also the holder of a Coast Guard-issued merchant mariner credential, submitted to a Coast Guard-mandated random drug test on January 11, 2012. The urine sample allegedly provided by Applicant subsequently tested positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites.Appeal No. 2714Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2/26/20162/26/201610/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2715 - SOLOMONAPPEARANCES For the Government: CWO Dan Sammons, USCG LT John D. Nee, USCG Senior Investigating Officer Mark Gibbs For Respondent: Graham W. Syfert, Esq. Administrative Law Judge: Dean C. Metry This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated May 15, 2013, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard (hereinafter "ALJ") suspended the Merchant Mariner Document of Ms. Simone Joyce Solomon (hereinafter "Respondent") for fourteen months upon finding proved one charge of misconduct. The specification found proved alleged that on July 2, 2012, Respondent, while serving as a crewmember aboard the vessel ALLIANCE CHARLESTON, refused a chemical test, in violation of 49 C.F.R. § 40.191(b), by submitting what according to 49 C.F.R. § 40.93(b) was a substituted urine specimen. Respondent subsequently appealed the D&O to the Commandant, United States Coast Guard, who affirmed the D&O. Respondent then appealed to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). In Zukunft v. Solomon, NTSB Order No. EM-213 (March 24, 2016), the NTSB remanded the matter for further examination of salient issues. The parties now advise that they have reached a tentative settlement agreement, and request that the matter be remanded to the ALJ to allow the agreement to be effected.Appeal No. 2715Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/3/201610/3/201610/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2716 - CHESBROUGH temp, licenseAPPEARANCES For the Government: LCDR Benjamin M. Robinson Coast Guard Sector Columbia River Respondent: Mr. Richard Albert Chesbrough, pro se Administrative Law Judge: George J. Jordan This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. On July 26, 2016, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard issued a Decision and Order revoking the Merchant Mariner Credentials of Mr. Richard A. Chesbrough (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved two specifications of misconduct, and one specification of conviction of an offense that would preclude issuance of : " a Coast Guard MMC. On July 22, 2016, Respondent filed a Notice of Appeal in the matter. He perfected his appeal by filing an Appellate Brief on August 30, 2016. In a letter dated August 3 0, 2016, Respondent requested issuance of a Temporary Mariner Credential as appellate action commenced in his case. The ALJ considered Respondent's request and, on October 13, 2016, issued a Decision and Order denying issuance of a temporary credential to Respondent. Via letter dated October 29, 2016, Respondent attacks the ALJ's denial of a temporary credential, among other things, and requests that his credential be returned to him while he waits for the outcome of his case. I am treating this as an appeal of the ALJ's denial of his request for a temporary credential. The ALJ's decision on the temporary credential refers to all tlu·ee of the allegations found proved: Allegations Two (misconduct: making a false statement in a casualty investigation), Three (misconduct: attempting to induce a witness to testify falsely in a marine casualty investigation), and Six (conviction of an offense that would prevent the issuance or renewal of a MMC).Appeal No. 2716Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/23/20173/23/201710/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2701 - CHRISTIANDECISION OF THE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL FROM DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES FROM THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD This appeal is taken in accordance with S U.S.C. § S04 and 49 C.F.R. Part 6. By order dated July 21,2011, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") of the United States Coast Guard denied Aaron Louis Christian's (hereinafter "Respondent's") application for attorney's fees and expenses incurred as a result of defending himself against a charge of misconduct brought by the Coast Guard against his merchant mariner credentials. Through its original Complaint, the Coast Guard alleged that Respondent committed misconduct and violation of law or regulation by manifesting a blood alcohol content level in excess of the Department of Transportation's Breath Alcohol standards. The Coast Guard subsequently amended its Complaint to remove the "violation of law or regulation" allegation. The allegation of misconduct remained and was a pending charge throughout all stages of the proceeding against Respondent's merchant mariner credentials. The misconduct allegation alleged that Respondent violated a company policy which prohibits employees from reporting to work under the influence of alcohol.Appeal No. 2701Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/22/20137/22/201310/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2702 - CARROLLAPPEARANCES For the Government: CWO Christian Menefee, USCG L T Christopher L. Jones, USCG Coast Guard Sector Houston/Galveston Mr. Gary F. Ball Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Respondent: Vuk S. Vujasinovic, Esq. Kenneth B. Fenelon, Jr., Esq. Vujasinovic & Beckcom, PLLC Administrative Law Judge: Dean C. Metry This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.P.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "0&0,.) dated January 20, 2012, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard suspended the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Shean Mason Carroll (hereinafter "Respondent") for twenty-four months upon finding proved two charges of misconduct in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 7703(1 )(b) and 46 C.F.R. § 5.27, by refusing a drug test. The specifications found proved alleged that on February 5, 2010, Respondent refused a drug test, following a determination that the temperature of his urine sample was outside the acceptable range, by failing to raise and lower his clothing to permit the observer to determine that he did not have a prosthetic device, and by possessing or wearing a prosthetic device that could be used to interfere with the sample collection process. The Coast Guard appeals.Appeal No. 2702Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/10/201310/10/201310/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2703 - WEBERAPPEARANCES For the Government: LT Jeff A. Fry, USCG James P. Fink, USCG For Respondent: Terry D. Weber, prose Administrative Law Judge: Walter J. Brudzinski This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.P.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated September 22, 2011, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") of the United States Coast Guard revoked the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Terry D. Weber (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved a charge of use of dangerous drugs in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 7704(c) and 46 C.F.R. § 5.35. The specification found proved alleged that on January 31, 2011, Respondent submitted to a random drug test and provided a urine sample that tested positive for the presence of marijuana metabolites.Appeal No. 2703Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority11/4/201311/4/201310/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2704 - FRANKSAPPEARANCES For the Government: CWO Christian Menefee, USCG LT Christopher Jones, USCG Coast Guard Sector Houston/Galveston Mr. Brian C. Crockett Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Respondent: Michael Aaron Franks, pro se Administrative Law Judge: Dean C. Metry This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701 et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter “D&O”) dated November 16, 2011, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter “ALJ”) of the United States Coast Guard dismissed the Coast Guard’s Complaint against Mr. Michael Aaron Franks (hereinafter “Respondent”). The Complaint alleged that Respondent was a user of or was addicted to the use of dangerous drugs. While the ALJ found that Respondent tested positive for cocaine metabolites during a drug test, because the ALJ determined that Respondent’s drug test was not conducted in accordance with the regulatory requirements of 46 C.F.R. Part 16 (the Coast Guard’s chemical testing requirements), the ALJ found the Coast Guard’s Complaint Not Proved and dismissed the matter with prejudice.Appeal No. 2704Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/30/20147/30/201410/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2705 - PLENDERAPPEARANCES For the Government: Mr. Gary F. Ball VICE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL NO. • 27 0 5 Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise For Respondent: William Hewig III, Esq. Kopelman and Paige, P.C. Administrative Law Judge: Walter J. Brudzinski This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. § 7701, et seq., 46 C.F.R. Part 5, and the procedures in 33 C.F .R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated September 17, 2012, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard revoked the Merchant Mariner Credentials issued to Mr. Kirk C. Plender (hereinafter "Respondent") upon finding proved one charge of incompetence. The specification found proved alleges the following. Respondent submitted a completed Merchant Mariner Physical Examination Report (Form CG-719K) to the Coast Guard on February 18, 2010. His Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (hereinafter "ICD") and underlying cardiac conditions documented in the Form CG-719K rendered him physically incompetent and unfit for merchant mariner duties. The Coast Guard National Maritime Center (hereinafter ''NMC"), on March 22, 2010, informed Respondent that he was not medically fit for merchant mariner duties due to the heart condition and ICD. Thereafter, on multiple occasions between March 22, 2010, and November 21, 2011, Respondent served onboard American President Lines (hereinafter "APL") vessels as Chief Mate, a safety-sensitive position required by the vessels' Certificates of Inspection. Finally, the specification alleges that by so serving while not medically fit to do so, Respondent committed an act of incompetence.Appeal No. 2705Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority10/1/201410/1/201410/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2706 - CHESBROUGHAPPEARANCES For the Government: LT Kimberly D. Rule, USCG Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Portland Respondent Pro se Administrative Law Judge: George J. Jordan This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated July 25, 2012, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "AU") of the United States Coast Guard suspended the Merchant Mariner License of Mr. Richard Albert Chesbrough (hereinafter "Respondent") for two months outright and ordered a further two months suspension on eighteen months probation upon finding proved one specification of misconduct and one specification of negligence. The misconduct specification alleges that on April 12, 2011, Respondent, while acting under the authority of his Coast Guard-issued mariner license, committed misconduct by navigating the vessel WILLAMETTE QUEEN from the Willamette Slough into the Willamette River in violation of the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, which limited operation of the vessel to the Willamette Slough when the river gauge at Salem reads 11 feet or more, as it did on the relevant date. The negligence specification alleges the same facts and further alleges that Respondent acted negligently by failing to check the river gauge at Salem to ascertain the river's stage, by operating the vessel outside the conditions of its Certificate of Inspection, and by grounding the vessel at Mile 85 on the Willamette River.Appeal No. 2706Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/23/20151/23/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority2707 - CHESBROUGH IIAPPEARANCES For the Government: LT Kimberly D. Rule, USCG CWO John Nay, USCG Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Portland For the Respondent: Mr. Richard Albert Chesbrough Co-Representative: Mr. Scott Clifford Vancouver, Washington Administrative Law Judge: George J. Jordan This appeal is taken in accordance with 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77, 46 C.F.R. Part 5 and 33 C.F.R. Part 20. By a Decision and Order (hereinafter "D&O") dated September 18, 2013, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter "ALJ") of the United States Coast Guard suspended the Merchant Mariner Credential of Mr. Richard Albert Chesbrough (hereinafter "Respondent") for two months upon finding proved one specification of misconduct. The misconduct specification alleges that on May 9, 2012, Respondent, while acting under the authority of his Coast Guard-issued mariner license, committed misconduct by navigating the vessel WILLAMETTE QUEEN from the Willamette Slough into the Willamette River in violation of the vessel's Certificate of Inspection, which limited operation of the vessel to the Willamette Slough when the river gauge at Salem reads 11 ft or more, as it did on the relevant date.Appeal No. 2707Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority1/23/20151/23/201510/31/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0345 - RAYIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-439836 Issued to: CICERO JAMES RAY DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 345 CICERO JAMES RAY This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 14 April, 1949 an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Port Arthur, Texas entered an order revoking Appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document Z-439836 and all other documents, certificates and/or licenses issued to him, upon finding him guilty of "misconduct" based upon two specifications alleging, first, assault and striking his superior officer on 16 August, 1947 while serving as fireman-watertender on the SS JOHN G. WHITTIER and; second, importing and bringing into the United States 270 grains of bulk marihuana on 14 July, 1948 while serving as oiler on the American SS ALMERIA LYKES.Appeal No. 0345Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/28/19496/28/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0346 - MCKINZEYIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. 521617 Issued to: JAMES McKINZEY DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 346 JAMES McKINZEY This appeal has been taken in accordance with 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 4 April, 1949, Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Mobile, Alabama, on a charge of misconduct supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as pantryman on board the American SS JOSEPH N. DINAND, under authority of his duly issued Certificate of Service No. E-521617, he assaulted a crew member, Manuel Herrera, with a dangerous weapon on or about 25 June, 1946.Appeal No. 0346Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/23/19496/23/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0347 - BARIIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. E-560773 Issued to: SANTIAGO M. BARI DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 347 SANTIAGO M. BARI This appeal has been taken in conformance with 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 5 May, 1949, the Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on a charge of misconduct supported by two specifications. The first specification alleges that while Appellant was serving as galleyman on board the American SS GULFBRAND, under authority of a duly issued Certificate of Service (E-560773), he aided and assisted Manuel De Jesus Rocha, on about 12 September, 1948, in stowing away on board the vessel without the consent of the master. The second specification alleges that while still serving in the above capacity, the Appellant aided and assisted the alien Rocha, on or about 18 September, 1948, in illegally entering the United States, contrary to 8 United States Code 144.Appeal No. 0347Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/14/19496/14/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0348 - RHONEIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-757800 Issued to: RICHARD RHONE DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 348 RICHARD RHONE This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 17 May, 1949, the Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Galveston, Texas, on a charge of misconduct supported by two specifications. The first specification alleges that while Appellant was serving as utilityman on board the American SS GENERAL R. E. CALLAN under authority of his Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-757800, he had in his possession four marijuana cigarettes on or about 18 June, 1947, while in the port of New York. The second specification alleges that Appellant while serving as above, and on the same date, gave aid and comfort to a member of the crew in assisting him to land marijuana in the United States.Appeal No. 0348Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/22/19496/22/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0349 - VIRNETIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-20966 Issued to: ANIBAL VIRNET DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 349 ANIBAL VIRNET In The Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-20966 Issued to: ANIBAL VIRNET Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-669069 Issued to: CLARENCE DEANE MILLER Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-630431-D1 Issued to: JOHN HENRY WHEATLEY Certificate of Service No. E-61599 Issued to: MANCEL S. HAWKINS DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 349 This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 30 and 31 March, 1949, each of the above-named Appellants appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, to answer a charge of "misconduct" supported by the following specification: "In that you, while serving (in the stated individual capacity) on board a merchant vessel of the United States, the MV LUCIDOR, under authority of your duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document (or Certificate, as applicable) did, on or about 25 January, 1949, unlawfully delay the sailing of said vessel from a domestic port by reason of failure to report aboard in accordance with posted sailing orders, such being contrary to 46 U.S.C. 701."Appeal No. 0349Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority9/29/19499/29/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0350 - DARCYIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. A-25811 Issued to: CLEMENCE LEO DARCY DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 350 CLEMENCE LEO DARCY This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 19 April, 1949, and 22 April, 1949, Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Seattle, Washington, to answer a charge of misconduct based upon four specifications. These specifications allege that Appellant did, while serving as deck maintenance man on the American SS STEPHEN W. KEARNY under authority of his duly issued Certificate of Service No. A-25811: 1. On or about 2 February, 1949, while said vessel was at a foreign port, fail to return on board in reasonable time after having been released from doctor as fit for duty. 2. On or about 3 and 4 February, 1949, while serving as above, fail to perform his duties without reasonable cause. 3. On 2, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 March, 1949, while serving as above, fail to turn to at 0800 and perform his duties between the hours of 0800 and 1700 by reason of being under the influence of intoxicants all in violation of good order and discipline.Appeal No. 0350Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/30/19496/30/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0331 - DUKEIn the Matter of MERCHANT MARINER'S DOCUMENT Z-31679-D3 Issued to: KEOWN DUKE DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 331 KEOWN DUKE This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On March 18, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard entered an order revoking Merchant Mariner's Document Z31679-D3 and all other merchant mariner's documents issued to Keown Duke upon a plea of guilty to a charge of misconduct, supported by seven specifications alleging unfitness for duty by reason of intoxication on seventeen occasions while employed as able seaman aboard the SS WILLIAM FLOYD from September through November, 1947, while the vessel was in divers foreign ports. Appellant, acting as his own counsel, pleaded guilty to the charge of misconduct and to the seven specifications alleging his unfitness for duty by reason of intoxication. Appellant did not take the witness stand nor did he have any other witnesses appear on his behalf. The Investigating Officer described the result of his investigation of the complaint. After receiving this evidence, the Examiner found the charge and specification proved by the Appellant's plea. However, he deferred further action in order to afford the Appellant an opportunity to adduce either witnesses as to his previous good conduct or letters of recommendation attesting to the same. When he was advised that, after the passage of three days, the Appellant was unable to secure either character witnesses or letters of recommendation, the Examiner entered the order of revocation.Appeal No. 0331Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/22/19494/22/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0332 - TIMASIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. A-14082 Issued to: ANTHONY L. TIMAS DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 332 ANTHONY L. TIMAS This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 3 March, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard entered an order revoking Certificate of Service No. A-14082 and all other documents issued to Anthony L. Timas upon a plea of "guilty" to a charge of misconduct, supported by a specification alleging that Anthony L. Timas unlawfully possessed, received, and facilitated transportation and concealment of approximately 212 grains of heroin while serving as an able seaman aboard the SS MARINE FALCON on 23 July, 1947, in New York, New York. At the hearing, Appellant was advised of his rights and was represented by counsel. No witnesses appeared. The Investigating Officer described the results of his investigation of the case. Counsel for Appellant made a statement in the nature of a plea that Appellant be given another chance to go to sea based on counsel's personal knowledge of Appellant's previous history and on circumstances surrounding the case. The Examiner found the charge and specification proved by the Appellant's plea and entered the order of revocation.Appeal No. 0332Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/5/19495/5/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0333 - PARKERIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-433886-D1 Issued to: MORRIS PARKER DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 333 MORRIS PARKER This appeal comes before me by virtue of 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 4 April, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard entered an order revoking Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-433886-D1 and all other valid licenses and certificates issued by the Coast Guard held by Morris Parker, upon a plea of guilty to a charge of misconduct, supported by a specification alleging possession of about 12 grains of marijuana contrary to law, while serving under the authority of the document as a messman aboard the American SS AFRICAN SUN on 23 March, 1949, while that vessel was moored at Brooklyn, New York. Appellant was advised of the nature of the hearing, his right to have counsel, and of his other rights at the beginning of the hearing. Appellant, appearing as his own counsel, entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer described the results of his investigation. Appellant did not testify under oath, but stated that he had been smoking marijuana cigarettes for about two years. He made various other statements including one regarding the manner in which he obtained the marijuana which was found in his possession. No witnesses appeared. The Examiner found the charge and specification proved by plea and entered the order of revocation.Appeal No. 0333Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/9/19495/9/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0334 - TERCEROIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-456458 Issued to: FRED EUGENE TERCERO DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT 334 FRED EUGENE TERCERO This appeal comes before me by virtue of 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 3 March, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at San Francisco, California, revoked Merchant Mariner's Document Z-456458 issued to Fred Eugene Tercero upon finding him guilty of a charge of misconduct based upon two specifications alleging that on 17 March, 1948, he unlawfully imported a quantity of marijuana without having registered and paid the tax required by law, and that he unlawfully acquired this marijuana without paying the transfer tax required by law. At the hearing, Appellant was given a full explanation of the nature of the proceedings and the possible consequences. He was advised that he was entitled to counsel, but Appellant chose to act as his own counsel. Appellant entered a plea of "not guilty" to the first specification and a plea of "guilty" to the second specification. The Investigating Officer made an opening statement concerning his investigation of the case, and took the witness stand for the purpose of identifying a certified copy of a commitment order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, dated 15 April, 1948, in the case of United States versus Fred E. Tercero.Appeal No. 0334Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority5/11/19495/11/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0335 - DIPMOREIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-294959-D1 Issued to: IVORY IVY DIPMORE DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 335 IVORY IVY DIPMORE This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 21 March, 1949, Appellant was charged before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York with misconduct, for that while serving as 3rd cook on the American SS MARINE TIGER under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document Z-294959-D1, he did on or about 2 March, 1949, while said vessel was in the port of New York, unlawfully have in his possession narcotics, to wit, eleven grains of marijuana and nine grains of marijuana seed. Voluntarily waiving his right to representation by counsel, Appellant entered a plea of "guilty with an explanation" to this charge. At a hearing on 22 March, 1949, the unsworn statement of Appellant was received wherein he admitted his possession of narcotics but claimed they had been given him by a "friend" following their mutual indulgence in several drinks. The Examiner found Appellant was guilty by virtue of the plea and entered an order revoking the documents identified above and all other documents or certificates held by this Appellant.Appeal No. 0335Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/13/19496/13/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0336 - HOLTIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-169409 Issued to: ARNOLD HOLT DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 336 ARNOLD HOLT This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 1 March, 1949, the Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York on a charge of misconduct supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as fireman-watertender on board the American SS ROCK SPRING VICTORY, under authority of a duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document (Z-169409), he had in his possession, contrary to law, on or about 12 January, 1948, a quantity of narcotics; to wit, marijuana. Appellant voluntarily waived his right to representation by counsel and entered a plea of "guilty" to the charge and specification. After the hearing, the Examiner entered an order revoking said Merchant Mariner's Document and all other valid licenses, certificates and documents held by the Appellant. Appellant indicates in his appeal that he feels his documents should not be revoked in view of the lesser punishment meted out to one George Griffith for a similar type offense. Both Appellant and George Griffith received probationary suspensions from U. S. District courts. Griffith also had his documents suspended outright for two months and was placed on probation for two years.Appeal No. 0336Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/2/19496/2/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0337 - SULLIVANIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-413451 Issued to: WILLIAM THOMAS SULLIVAN, JR. DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 337 WILLIAM THOMAS SULLIVAN, JR. This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 4 April, 1949, the Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York on a charge of misconduct supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as ordinary seaman on board the American SS MARINE MARLIN, under authority of a duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document (Z-413451), he had in his possession, contrary to law, on or about 24 March, 1949, approximately 32 grains of a narcotic known as marijuana. Appellant voluntarily waived his right to representation by counsel and entered a plea of "guilty" to the specification. After the hearing, the Examiner found both the specification and the charge proved, and he thereupon entered an order revoking said Merchant Mariner's Document Z-413451 and all other valid licenses and certificates issued to the Appellant by the United States Coast Guard or any predecessor authority.Appeal No. 0337Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/9/19496/9/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0338 - NASSERIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-35960 Issued to: JOSEPH NASSER DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 338 JOSEPH NASSER This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 17 March, 1949, the Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York on a charge of "misconduct" supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as utilityman on board the American SS PONTUS H. ROSS, under authority of a duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document (Z-35960), he unlawfully possessed and concealed, and facilitated the transportation and concealment at New York on or about 7 March, 1948, of a certain narcotic drug commonly known as heroin which weighed approximately seventeen ounces. At the hearing, the Appellant was given a full explanation of the nature of the proceedings and the possible consequences, and he was represented by counsel of his own selection. Appellant entered a plea of "guilty" to the specification. Upon completion of the hearing, the Examiner entered an order revoking said Merchant Mariner's Document and all other licenses, certificates or documents issued by the United States Coast Guard to Appellant.Appeal No. 0338Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/5/19497/5/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0339 - LUCIENIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. E-521498 Issued to: JAMES HARRY LUCIEN, JR. DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 339 JAMES HARRY LUCIEN, JR. This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 22 March, 1949, the Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, on a charge of misconduct supported by a specification alleging that while Appellant was serving as messman on board the American SS SULPHUR MINES, under authority of Certificate of Service No. E-521498, he unlawfully had in his possession on or about 16 February, 1949, certain narcotics known as marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant was given a full explanation of the nature of the proceedings and the possible consequences. He voluntarily waived his right to representation by counsel and pleaded "guilty" to the charge and specification. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner entered an order revoking Certificate of Service No. E-521498 and all other valid certificates of service held by the Appellant. In his appeal, Appellant states that this is his first offense of any nature and that he did not intend to sell the marijuana to others but had planned to use it himself. Appellant is twenty-one years of age.Appeal No. 0339Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/9/19496/9/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0340 - NORMANIn The Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. Z-531800-D2 Issued to: PHILLIP NORMAN DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 340 PHILLIP NORMAN This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 26 April, 1949 Appellant was charged before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, with "misconduct" for that while serving as "galley utility" on board a merchant vessel of the United States, the SS PHILIP BARBOUR under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document Z-531800-D2, he failed to join said vessel without reasonable cause on or about 7 April, 1949. Voluntarily waiving his right to counsel, Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge, although he admitted that he had not sailed with the vessel at the time of its departure from New Orleans. There was received in evidence an excerpt from the Shipping Articles from the SS PHILIP BARBOUR showing Appellant's name, rating and wages. Appellant explained that his reason for failing to report to his vessel was due to the fact that on the evening of the 5th of April, he had gone ashore with permission, and had a number of drinks at a nightclub; that he was returning to the ship when the New Orleans police arrested and charged him with disorderly conduct. Before the Municipal Court at New Orleans, he was sentenced to serve 20 days and to pay a fine of $20.00 on each of two charges and his incarceration prevented him from returning to the vessel.Appeal No. 0340Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/19/19496/19/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0341 - BACHILLERIn the Matter of Certificate of Service No. E-654982 Issued to: RAFAEL L. BACHILLER DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 341 RAFAEL L. BACHILLER This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 21 April, 1949, Appellant was tried before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York City on a charge of misconduct supported by two specifications. The first specification alleges that while Appellant was serving as utilityman on board the American SS AGWISTAR, under authority of his duly issued Certificate of Service No. E-654982, he unlawfully, and knowingly, combined and conspired with certain named persons, on or about 15 October, 1948, and continuously thereafter up to on or about 3 February, 1949, to violate 26 United States Code 2591(a) and 26 United States Code 2593(a). The second specification alleges that, while serving as above, Appellant, on or about 27 January, 1949, unlawfully acquired approximately one pound of marijuana without having paid the transfer tax imposed by 26 United States Code 2590(a) and thus violated 26 United States Code 2593(a). Appellant was represented at the hearing by counsel and the latter, in behalf of Appellant and with his authorization, entered a plea of "not guilty" to the first specification and a plea of "guilty" to the second specification. The Examiner received testimony from both parties in connection with the first specification. The Examiner then, having found the first specification "proved in part" and the second specification "proved by plea," entered an order revoking Certificate of Service No. E-654982 and all other valid licenses, documents and certificates held by Appellant which had been issued to him by the Coast Guard or the predecessor authority.Appeal No. 0341Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/17/19496/17/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0342 - JESUSIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document Z-62646 Issued to: OTILIO DE JESUS DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 342 OTILLIO DE JESUS This case comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239 (g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 6 April, 1949 Appellant appeared before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York, charged with "misconduct" for that while serving as an Able Seaman on the SS AGWISTAR under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document Z-62646, on 27 January, 1949 he unlawfully had in his possession a certain quantity of Marihuana - to wit, approximately 1 pound. Appellant was represented by counsel who also served as interpreter for Appellant and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. After hearing the report of the Investigating Officer and the argument by counsel for Appellant, the Examiner entered an ordered revoking appellant's Merchant Mariner's Document aforesaid together with all other documents or certificates now held by the Appellant.Appeal No. 0342Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/6/19496/6/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0343 - JACKSONIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's Document No. BK-308991 Issued to: JOHNNIE LEE JACKSON DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 343 JOHNNIE LEE JACKSON This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. Appellant was charged with misconduct before an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Norfolk, Virginia, based upon specifications alleging that while serving as a messman on the American SS TOWANDA VICTORY, under authority of his duly issued Merchant Mariner's Document No. BK-308991, he did (1.) On or about 22 March, 1949, while said vessel was in the port of Cherbourg, France, unlawfully have in his possession, and concealed in his clothing, a bread knife with an eight inch blade which was a deadly weapon. (2.) On or about 22 March, 1949, while said vessel was in Cherbourg, France, attempt to assault the Second Officer of said vessel with a deadly weapon while under the influence of liquor. (3.) Fail, without justifiable cause, to respond to a summons served upon him by an authorized officer of the United States Coast Guard.Appeal No. 0343Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority6/23/19496/23/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0344 - CROFTIn the Matter of Merchant Mariner's License No. A-2008 Issued to: ROBERT M. MAGNUSON DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 344 ROBERT M. MAGNUSON This appeal comes before me by virtue of Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 14 February, 1949, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Detroit, Michigan, entered an order suspending License No. A-2008 for a period of three months upon finding Appellant guilty of the charge of "negligence" while he was serving as Master on board the American SS HARRY W. CROFT under authority of his duly issued license. The charge is based on a specification alleging that Appellant failed to navigate the SS HARRY W. CROFT at a moderate speed during a period of low visibility, on or about 30 October, 1948, while on a voyage from Toledo, Ohio, to Indiana Harbor, Indiana, carrying approximately nine thousand tons of coal. This is a violation of Rule 15 of the laws relating to the navigation of vessels, Title 33, United States Code 272. At the hearing, the regulatory requirements with respect to Appellant's rights were complied with and Appellant was represented by counsel of his own choice. Appellant pleaded "not guilty" to the specification but at the conclusion of the hearing, the Examiner found the specification and charge "proved." After his license had been suspended, the Appellant was issued a temporary license pending determination of this appeal.Appeal No. 0344Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority7/8/19497/8/194910/30/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0312 - GAIERIn the Matter of License No. A-16363 Issued to: JOSEPH B. GAIER DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 312 JOSEPH B. GAIER This appeal comes before me by virtue of 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On December 22, 1948, a hearing was held before an Examiner, United States Coast Guard, New York, New York, on a charge of misconduct, supported by three specifications, preferred against Joseph B. Gaier, Z-15807 (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), formerly Chief Mate of the SS SIMEON G. REED. The appellant was represented by counsel and entered a plea of "not guilty" to the charge of misconduct, as well as to the three specifications alleging (1) breaking in of the stateroom door of the 3rd Assistant Engineer; (2) incapacity for proper performance of duty by reason of intoxication; and, (3) use of abusive and threatening language to the master.Appeal No. 0312Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority4/29/19494/29/19499/20/2017
Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority0313 - LUHRNINGIn the Matter of Certificate E-311299 Issued to: HIRAM R. LUHRNING DECISION AND FINAL ORDER OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 313 HIRAM R. LUHRNING This appeal comes before me by virtue of 46 United States Code 239(g) and 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.11-1. On 23 December, 1948, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at New York revoked Certificate of Service No. E-311299 and all other valid certificates or documents issued to Hiram Luhrning upon finding him guilty of misconduct based upon evidence to support a specification alleging that while serving as crew messman on the American SS COURSER, on or about 10 May, 1948, while said vessel was at sea, he unlawfully had in his possession 2 ounces, 243 grains of marijuana. At the hearing, Appellant was given a full explanation of the nature of the proceedings and the possible consequences; he voluntarily waived his right to representation by counsel, and entered a plea of guilty to the charge and specification. Whereupon the Examiner entered the order above mentioned.Appeal No. 0313Suspension and Revocation Appeals Authority3/2/19493/2/19499/20/2017
Page 23 of 24

The U.S. Department of Defense is committed to making its electronic and information technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended in 1998. DoD websites use the WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standard.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on a particular website, please use the form DoD Section 508 Form.  In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question. If your issue involves log in access, password recovery, or other technical issues, contact the administrator for the website in question, or your local helpdesk.