Fixed
Fire Extinguishing Systems for
Small Passenger Vessels (T-Boats)
This site provides information on the types of fixed fire extinguishing
systems that can be installed onboard a Small Passenger Vessel
inspected under Title 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations (46 CFR)
Subchapter T, as well as information on choosing a fixed fire
extinguishing system and main engine shut down options.
Page Index:
- Types of fixed firefighting systems.
- Choice of extinguishing system.
- Engine shutdown options.
1. Types of Fixed Firefighting Systems
Custom engineered systems
These are type approved systems originally intended for manned spaces
on large vessels, but include scaled-down system configurations
suitable for installation in unmanned spaces such as engine
compartments on Subchapter T vessels. They include carbon dioxide
systems (approval category 162.038), new clean fire extinguishing
agents such as FM200 (approval category 162.161), and halon (approval
category 162.035). There are no new halon systems because halon is no
longer manufactured due to environmental concerns.
These systems are type approved after initial testing by an independent
testing lab (Underwriters Laboratories) and are described in the
manufacturer's approved design, installation, operation and maintenance
manual. They are called "engineered" or "custom engineered" because
they are specifically designed for each vessel's engine room by amount
of agent, pipe lengths, pipe sizes, nozzle size, number of nozzles,
etc. The system manufacturer's distributor (not the vessel operator)
designs these systems by entering a vessel's engine room dimensions
into the manufacturer's computer program, which calculates the amount
of agent, number of agent cylinders, pipe sizes, and number and size of
nozzles, etc., needed to protect the specific engine room. The system
components must be selected from the manufacturer's approved manual.
Manufacturers of custom engineered systems are issued certificates of
approval, which can be found on-line at
CGMIX.
The review of these systems is conducted primarily by the
Coast
Guard Marine Safety Center.
Pre-engineered systems
These are type approved systems originally designed for pleasure craft
engine compartments as automatic systems, but many models are suitable
for many Subchapter T applications because they are equipped with
manual backup actuators and provisions for ventilation and engine
shutdowns. They are called "pre-engineered" because they are tested by
an independent testing lab (UL or FM) to extinguish a fire in a
simulated engine compartment of the maximum volume which they are
intended to protect. Unlike custom engineered systems, a pre-engineered
system can be installed in any unmanned engine room of equal or lesser
gross volume in accordance with the limitations described in its
owner's manual.
The systems are intended to be an "off the shelf" item suitable for
installation by either a fire equipment distributor or the vessel's
operator. The systems currently type approved are simple, consisting of
a single agent cylinder with attached valve, and are attached to a
bulkhead inside the engine compartment. Currently approved systems have
no discharge piping, the agent being discharged directly from the
cylinder valve through the attached sprinkler head when the heat from a
fire causes the sprinkler head to actuate. The agents include clean
agents FM200 and FE241 (all under approval category 162.029), and
carbon dioxide (although no systems are currently being marketed). The
systems must be installed and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer's approved owner's manual.
Manufacturers of pre-engineered systems are issued certificates of
approval, which can be found on-line at
CGMIX.
These system installations are reviewed and approved by the Coast Guard
Officer in Charge Marine Inspection (OCMI) on a vessel-by-vessel basis.
Alternatives
If the machinery space of the Subchapter T vessel can be protected by
the contents of one portable or semi-portable fire extinguisher, such
an extinguisher may be used as a fixed gas fire extinguishing system
subject to the requirements found in 46 CFR 181.400(b)(5). However,
portable and semi-portable extinguishers may not be converted
into fixed systems by replacing components such as valves, hoses and
nozzles with miscellaneous valves, piping, etc., for the following
reasons:
1. Such modifications void laboratory (Underwriters Laboratories (UL)
or Factory Mutual (FM)) listings and Coast Guard type approvals. Also,
manufacturers will deny responsibility when injuries occur or the
modified equipment does not extinguish a fire.
2. There is no guarantee that the modified equipment will work. Fire
extinguishers obtain their UL or FM Listings and CG type approval after
undergoing extensive tests and quality control inspections. They're
approved as a unit (as they leave the factory). Field modifications do
not have the benefit of having undergone such tests.
3. Modifying fire extinguishers is inherently dangerous to the persons
doing the modifications because it involves high pressure cylinders
(the pressure inside a CO2 extinguisher is 850 psi at 70 degrees F
(5900 kPa at 21 degrees C)). That's why DOT requires organizations
servicing high pressure cylinders to be DOT certified.
It is possible to use portable and semi-portable extinguishers to flood
engine compartments in lieu of using a fixed system by following these
guidelines:
A portable extinguisher attached to the outside of the engine
compartment can be discharged through a closeable discharge port into
the protected compartment. The method of attachment should permit the
nozzle to be inserted into the discharge port during a fire. The
discharge port must be sized to accommodate the extinguisher nozzle.
This procedure is also used on pleasure craft as an (second best)
alternative to fixed systems protecting small volumes (
American Boat and
Yacht Council
(ABYC) Standards, Chapter A-4), where a portable fire extinguisher is
attached by its bracket next to the discharge port. This concept has
been shown to be a viable concept for small engine compartments through
tests by ABYC committee members and Coast Guard R&D Report No.
CG-D-31-76.
The situation with semi-portable extinguishers (46 CFR 162.039 defines
them as extinguishers exceeding 55 pounds (25 kg) in gross weight) is
more complex in view of the greater amount of CO2 used (currently up to
100 pounds (45 kg)), and the larger spaces this amount of CO2 can
protect. They are permitted where they can supply the amount of
CO2 needed for
total flooding as determined by the OCMI. However, to work properly,
the nozzles must distribute the agent uniformly throughout the space.
For the engineered CO2 systems they are intended to replace, the reach
of CO2 from a single nozzle is about 10 feet (3 m). Nozzles for
engineered systems are spaced uniformly throughout the space in order
to achieve a uniform extinguishing agent concentration. As a result the
use of semi-portables (which have only one
nozzle) should be limited to situations where a one-nozzle system would
suffice, i.e. the
distance from the nozzle to the compartment end should not exceed 10
feet (3 m). The volume of the space so protected should therefore be
not more than 1000 cubic feet (28 cu m). It is also not acceptable to
hang the hose into the protected compartment and rig the spring-loaded
valve at the end of the hose to stay open. The rubber hoses and plastic
nozzles have not been subjected to any relevant testing and are not
expected to withstand a fire exposure.
The semi-portables must not be modified, by replacing valves, hoses and
nozzles which are supplied as an integral part of each semi-portable
with different valves, fixed pipe, and different nozzles. Any
semi-portable systems that have been so modified are to be considered
custom-engineered systems and must be specifically approved by the
Coast Guard in accordance with 46 CFR 181.410.
In view of the great variety of engine compartment designs and fire
protection equipment available it will not be possible to provide
specific guidance applicable to all situations encountered in the
field. The above may be used as general guidance to be applied to the
extent local conditions permit. Unusual situations must be addressed on
a vessel-by-vessel basis. For example, where the large and irregular
shape of the protected space does not permit the above mentioned nozzle
coverage, or where the space has a significant amount of uncloseable
openings, additional CO2 may be supplied as compensation to ensure that
the CO2 in the space can reach extinguishing concentrations.
2. Choice of Extinguishing Systems
An operator of a subchapter T vessel that is required to install a
fixed gas fire extinguishing system has several alternatives.
* The operator may choose a system that will alert
him or her to a fire through a fire detection system prior to the
operator discharging a manual fixed system
-or-
* The operator may install a completely automatic
system that discharges the fixed system upon detection of a fire
without any interaction from the operator.
While automatic mechanical ventilation shut-off is required on all
custom and pre-engineered fixed gas fire extinguishing systems, an
automatic engine shutdown is not. The automatic shutdown of propulsion
machinery is only required when the fixed gas fire extinguishing system
is activated and when the machinery draws its intake air from within
the protected space. However, a dedicated intake air duct to all
propulsion machinery from outside the protected space eliminates the
need for an automatic engine shut-off switch. The requirement for
automatic shut-off switches stems from two facts: that propulsion
machinery or mechanical ventilation of the protected space may deplete
the extinguishing agent before it is able to perform its function; and
that most engine room fires are caused and/or fed by fuel or
lubricating oil. An automatic shut-off may also prevent damage to the
propulsion machinery from intake of an extinguishing agent and allow an
expeditious restart of the propulsion machinery after extinguishing the
fire.
3. Engine Shutdown Options
The various engine shut-down options available are explained below:
1. If the machinery space of the
subchapter T vessel can be protected by the contents of one portable or
semi-portable fire extinguisher, such an extinguisher may be used as a
fixed gas fire extinguishing system subject to the requirements found
in 46 CFR 181.400(b)(5). When installing a fixed system such as this, a
fire detecting system per the requirements of 46 CFR 181.400(c) is also
needed. This allows for complete manual control of the fixed gas fire
extinguishing system by the operator of the vessel. Marking
instructions required by 46 CFR 185.612 direct the operator to secure
ventilation and machinery prior to the discharge of the fixed system.
2. A custom-engineered fixed gas fire extinguishing system may be
installed in a subchapter T vessel in accordance with 46 CFR 181.410.
It is installed as a manual system activated by the operator following
the indication of a fire from a fire detection system in the protected
space. If the propulsion machinery draws intake air from within the
protected space, mechanical ventilation is automatically shut off
following the fixed system's activation by the operator.
3. A subchapter T vessel operator may install an "off the shelf"
pre-engineered system in accordance with 46 CFR 181.420. This system
will automatically shutdown propulsion machinery (that draws air from
the protected space), and mechanical ventilation without any
interaction from the operator. Some manufacturers provide a spring
activated manual override switch that permits the operator to maneuver
his vessel out of danger before initiating the shutdowns and
subsequent discharge of the fixed gas fire extinguishing system.
4. Subchapter T was written assuming that Clean Agents would be the
preferred extinguishing agents for these vessels since less of these
agents, as opposed to CO2 , is needed to accomplish the same task. The
thinking was that most small passenger vessels lacked sufficient space
to accommodate CO2 cylinders. Since Clean Agents may be consumed by
the engines, depleting the concentration to a point that it would not
extinguish a fire, the requirement for an automatic shut down of the
engines was included in the regulations. CO2, when ingested by an
engine, will shut down the engine effectively serving as a shut down
device. Therefore, operators who choose CO2 as the extinguishing agent
may forgo the installation of a separate device to shut the engines
down. This action may be taken under 46 CFR 175.540 as an equivalency.