|
|
|
|
|
ITOS – Most cost effective alternative, but also lowest oil spillage averted. |
||
|
|
||
|
Background Based on a White House Action Plan issued to the Department of Transportation (DOT), an assessment of the marine safety system in Puget Sound-area waters was conducted to determine whether any additional casualty prevention measures were warranted. In November 1998, Secretary Slater determined that the many existing elements of the region’s marine transportation system comprise a safe system. He went on to indicate that improvements can always be made and among other things that the DOT would fund and manage an analysis of the costs and additional risk reduction benefits that would be afforded by tug escorts or by stationing a rescue tug in the region. The Regulatory Assessment addressed these measures. Why do the Assessment? In November 1998, the Coast Guard issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on potential rules that would improve marine safety in Puget Sound-area waters. Prior to any federal rulemaking a cost to benefit analysis must be performed; this assessment fills that role. Eight alternatives evaluated:
Assessment Approach
|
Assessment Approach (cont.)
Findings
Other Sources The complete Regulatory Assessment can be found on Internet at http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/pscb.pdf. |
|
|
|
||
The Thirteenth Coast Guard District Public Affairs Office (dep) created this page on December 27, 1998 and last modified it June 26, 2002. This page may be reproduced locally. If any changes are needed please notify D13 (dep) at 206.220.7237. More Coast Guard information can be accessed at http://www.uscg.mil and a complete listing of these fact sheets can be found at http://www.uscg.mil/d13. |
||